< Back to Current Version

European Security and Islamist Terrorism

Changes from March 16, 2015 to September 15, 2015

This page shows textual changes in the document between the two versions indicated in the dates above. Textual matter removed in the later version is indicated with red strikethrough and textual matter added in the later version is indicated with blue.


CRS Insights INSIGHT European Security, Islamist Terrorism, and Returning Fighters Fighters September 15, 2015 (IN10209) | | Kristin Archick, Specialist in European Affairs (karchick@crs.loc.gov, 7-2668) Paul Belkin, Analyst in European Affairs (pbelkin@crs.loc.gov, 7-0220) March 16, 2015 (IN10209) Terrorist Attacks in Europe and Mounting Security Concerns European concerns about Islamist terrorism have been heightened considerably by recent attacks in France and Denmark. In early January 2015, gunmen killed 17 people over several days in three related incidents that targeted the Paris headquarters of French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo, police officers, and a kosher supermarket. The perpetrators of the attacks were French-born Muslims, with possible ties to Al Qaeda in Yemen or the Islamic State terrorist organization. In mid-February 2015, a Danish-born citizen of Palestinian descent murdered two individuals—one at a Copenhagen cafe that had been hosting a free speech debate, another at a synagogue—and wounded five police officers. These incidents—along with the May 2014 killing of four people at the Jewish Museum in Brussels, Belgium, reportedly by a French Muslim who had spent a year with Islamist fighters in Syria—have reinforced growing unease throughout Europe about the possible threats posed by European Muslims fighting with extremist groups, especially in Syria and Iraq. Security services warn about the potential danger such trained militants might pose if and when they return to Europe, and worry about those, like the suspected Danish gunman, who may be inspired by Islamist extremist propaganda to commit several attacks over the last year and the growing number of European citizens training and fighting with extremist groups in foreign conflicts (especially in Syria and Iraq). Most recently, on August 21, a Moroccan man—who may have traveled to Syria—was arrested in France after attempting an alleged terrorist attack on a train traveling from Amsterdam to Paris (six passengers, including three Americans, stopped the attack). In late June, a man was beheaded during an attempt to blow up a U.S.owned chemical factory near Lyon, France; the suspect is a French citizen of Muslim background. Other incidents include the following: The May 2014 killing of four people at the Jewish Museum in Brussels, Belgium; a French Muslim who reportedly spent a year with Islamist fighters in Syria has been charged. The January 2015 attacks in Paris in which gunmen killed 17 people in three related incidents that targeted the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo, police officers, and a kosher supermarket. The perpetrators of the attacks were French-born Muslims, with possible ties to Al Qaeda in Yemen or the Islamic State terrorist organization. The February 2015 shootings in Copenhagen, Denmark, in which a Danish-born citizen of Palestinian descent murdered two individuals—one at a cafe that had been hosting a free speech debate, another at a synagogue—and wounded five police officers. Security services warn not only about the potential dangers posed by those who may have trained and fought abroad, but also about individuals like the Danish gunman or the Lyon suspect who appear to have been inspired by Islamist extremist propaganda to commit "lone wolf" attacks at home without ever traveling abroad. Although it is difficult to assess the precise number of Muslims from Europe who have joined extremist groups in Syria and Iraq, European officials believe that their ranks have increased significantly over the past two years. Recent estimates from Estimates from Europol, the European Union's (EU's) joint criminal intelligence body, suggest that at least 3,000 and upward of 5,000 EU citizens have left to fight in Syria, Iraq, or other conflict zones. A January 2015 study by the London-based International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation indicates that up to 4,000 individuals from Western Europe have become foreign fighters in Syria and Iraq. Key countries of origin reportedly include Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. The conflict in Syria and Iraq has has also attracted fighters from the Western Balkans (especially Bosnia, Kosovo, and Albania) and Russia. European Policy Responses European governments have employed a range of measures, including increasing surveillance and prohibiting travel, to combat the potential foreign fighter threat. Individuals suspected of planning travel to Syria or Iraq—or recruiting others to do so—have been arrested in several countries (including Belgium, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, and the United Kingdom) on terrorism charges. France, Germany, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom have enforced rules that permit the confiscation of passports or travel identification documents. Other European governments are considering new legislation to permit prosecuting those who travel or attempt to travel abroad for terrorist purposes, as required by U.N. Security Council Resolution 2178. European officials are also seeking to more aggressively counter radicalization and extremist propaganda, especially via the Internet and social media. Some have called on U.S. technology companies to assist these efforts by (For more information, see CRS Report R44003, European Fighters in Syria and Iraq: Assessments, Responses, and Issues for the United States). European Policy Responses European governments have employed a range of measures to combat the foreign fighter threat, including increasing surveillance, prohibiting travel, detaining returning fighters, and bolstering counterterrorism laws. Individuals suspected of having traveled to fight in Syria or Iraq, planning such travel, or recruiting others have been arrested in Belgium, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, and the United Kingdom (among other countries). Several European governments have enacted or are considering new legislation to ensure that their laws permit prosecuting those who travel or attempt to travel abroad for terrorist purposes, as required by U.N. Security Council Resolution 2178 of September 2014. European officials are also seeking to more aggressively counter radicalization and extremist propaganda, especially via the Internet and social media. Some have called on U.S. technology companies to assist these efforts by preemptively removing terrorist content from their sites. France, which is home to Europe's largest Muslim population (about 5-6 million) and the source of the largest number of European fighters in Syria and Iraq (about 1,400), has been at the forefront of European efforts to counter the threat posed by Islamist militants and returning fighters. In 2014, the . Over the past year, the government tookhas taken steps to strengthen counterterrorism policies already considered some of the most stringent in Europe. These have included imposing travel bans on individuals suspected of seeking terrorist training abroad and blocking websites that encourage terrorism. After the Paris attacks, French authorities announced additional significant measures, such as hiring 2,500 new law enforcement officials and boosting counter-radicalization programs, especially in French prisons, blocking websites and prohibiting speech that encourage terrorism, and significantly enhancing the state's surveillance authorities. Nevertheless, stemming the flow of European fighters to Syria and Iraq and keeping track of those who go and return remains challenging. Prosecuting individuals preemptively is difficult in many European countries because most existing laws require a high level of proof that a suspect has actually engaged in terrorism abroad or has returned to commit a terrorist act. Furthermore, as the attacks in France demonstrate, even those governments with far-reaching legal authority to detain terrorist suspects even governments with far-reaching legal authorities have been challenged to identify and monitor a growing number of potential assailants. Given assailants amid budgetary and personnel resource constraints, experts assert that it may be unrealistic to expect governments to effectively monitor every individual identified as a possible security threat. Analysts assert that more steps must also be taken. The suspects in the Brussels, Paris, and Lyon attacks had all been previously questioned by French authorities, but surveillance was lifted in each case. Analysts assert that more must be done at the EU level to better combat the potential foreign fighter threat given the EU'sSchengen system of largely open internal borders (which permit individuals to travel without passport checks among most European countries). In February 2015, EU leaders reiterated the need for enhancing information-sharing among national and EU authorities, strengthening external border controls, and improving existing counter-radicalization efforts, particularly online. However, The thwarted train attacker and the alleged Brussels gunman had each reportedly traveled between several European countries prior to the attacks. The EU has been seeking to enhance information-sharing among national and EU authorities, strengthen external border controls, and improve existing counter-radicalization efforts, particularly online. However, implementation of some of these initiatives and other possible EU-wide measures—such as harmonizing criminal laws against "jihadi travel" among the EU's 28 member states—could be impeded has been slowed by national sovereignty concerns, long-standing law enforcement barriers to sharing sensitive information, and civil liberty protections. Pressure has also increased to approve an EU-wide system for the collection of airline Passenger Name Record (PNR) data, which has been stalled in the European Parliament—a key EU institution—since in 2013 because of data privacy and protection concerns. In mid-February 2015, the European Parliament passed a resolution on anti-terrorism measures and pledged to work toward finalizing the EU-wide PNR proposal by the end of the year. A revised PNR proposal was presented in the Parliament on February 26, but observers caution that some Parliamentarians still worry that it could infringe too much on data privacy rights and may seek to link approval to progress on broader EU data protection reformsJuly 2015, the Parliament's civil liberties committee endorsed a revised PNR proposal, but it must still be approved by the full Parliament and the EU member states. Critics contend that the envisioned EU PNR system infringes too much on data privacy rights and does not go far enough in ensuring that PNR data is meaningfully shared among member states. In the wake of the aborted train attack, the EU is also expected to consider ways to strengthen rail security. U.S. Interests U.S. officials, including some Members of Congress, have expressed particular worries about the growing number ofworry that Europeans fighting with Islamist extremist groups abroad becausecould enter the United States under the U.S. Visa Waiver Program (VWP, see CRS Report RL32221, Visa Waiver Program) allows short-term, visa-free travel between the United States and most European countries. In the 113 th Congress, several pieces of legislation were introduced on the VWP, ranging from proposals to limit or suspend the program to those that sought to enhance the VWP's security controls further (one proposal, H.R. 158, has been reintroduced in the 114 th Congress). U.S. policymakers contend that the foreign fighter phenomenon underscores the importance of Waiver Program (VWP), which allows short-term, visa-free travel for citizens of most European countries (see CRS Report RL32221, Visa Waiver Program). In the 114th Congress, H.R. 158 and S. 542 largely aim to strengthen the VWP's security components to better guard against terrorist threats. U.S. policymakers assert that the foreign fighter phenomenon underscores the importance of maintaining close U.S.-EU counterterrorism cooperation (see CRS Report RS22030, U.S.-EU Cooperation Against Terrorism) and existing U.S.-EU information-sharing agreements, despite increased scrutiny from the EU following the unauthorized disclosures of classified U.S. surveillance activities since June 2013. U.S. officials Terrorism); they have also encouraged the EU to establish its own PNR system and to make greater use of existing EU-wide databases andEUwide information-sharing tools.