< Back to Current Version

The Congressional Review Act (CRA): A Brief Overview

Changes from December 11, 2014 to December 18, 2018

This page shows textual changes in the document between the two versions indicated in the dates above. Textual matter removed in the later version is indicated with red strikethrough and textual matter added in the later version is indicated with blue.


Updated December 11, 201418, 2018 The Congressional Review Act (CRA) Overview What is the CRA? The CRA (codified at 5 U.S.C. §§ 801808) is an oversighta tool Congress can use to overturn certain federal agency actions. The CRA was enacted as part of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act in 1996. The CRA requires agencies to report the issuance of “rules” to Congress and provides Congress with special procedures under which to consider legislation to overturn rules, in the form of a joint resolution of disapproval. The CRA was enacted as part of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA) in 1996. If a CRA joint resolution of disapproval is approved by both houses and signed by the President, or if Congress with special procedures, in the form of a joint resolution of disapproval, under which to consider legislation to overturn rules. If a CRA joint resolution of disapproval is approved by both houses of Congress and signed by the President, or if Congress successfully overrides a presidential veto, the rule at issue cannot go into effect or continue in effect. What is a rule under the CRA? The CRA adopts the broadest definition of a “rule” contained in the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), with three exceptions. Definition of a “Rule” underUnder the CRA The APA definition of a rule (5 U.S.C. §551) is “the whole or a part of an agency statement of general or particular applicability and and future effect designed to implement, interpret, or prescribe law or policy ... .” The CRA excludes three kindstypes of actions from from this definition of a rule: • • • rules(5 U.S.C. §804(3)): 1. Rules of particular applicability; any rule2. Rules relating to agency management and or personnel; and any rule3. Rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice that does do not substantially affect the rights and obligations of non-agency parties. 5 U.S.C. § 804(3); see 5 U.S.C. § 551 parties. The CRA applies to majorfinal rules, non-including major rules, final nonmajor rules, and interim final rules. Additionally, the definition is sufficiently broad that it may define as “rules” agency agency actions that are not subject to traditional notice and comment-andcomment rulemaking, such as guidance documents and policy memoranda. How many rules have been overturned using the CRA? The CRA has been used to overturn a total of 17 rules: 1 in the 107th Congress (2001-2002) and 16 in the 115th Congress (2017-2018). Submission of Rules to Congress What submission is required? Under the CRA, rules must be submittedThe CRA requires agencies to submit their rules to both houses of Congress and the Government Accountability Office (GAO) before they may take effect. The CRA does not specify when an agency must submit a rule. However, since a rule cannot become effective until after it is submittedIn practice, agencies generally submit rules around the time the rule is they are published. How do I know if a rule was submitted? Notice of each chambers’chamber’s receipt of a rule submitted under the CRA is published in the “Executive Communications” section of the Congressional Record. GAO also maintains a database, the “Federal Rules Database,” tracking submission of rules. What happens if an agency does not submit a rule? An agency may decline to submit an action to Congress and GAO if it does not consider the action to be a rule under the CRA. However, the agency may not have the last word on the applicability of the CRA. In the past, when Members of Congress have thought an agency action is a rule under the CRA, they have asked GAO for a formal opinion as to whether the action satisfies the CRA definition of a rule such that the agency would be required to comply with the CRA submission procedures. GAO has issued 11 opinions of this type at the request of Members of Congress. Although the CRA states that a joint resolution of disapproval can only be introduced after a rule is submitted and received by Congress, Members have had varying degrees of success in getting resolutions recognized as privileged under the CRA even if the agency never submitted the rule to Congress. It appears in the past that the Senate has considered the publication in the Congressional Record of the official GAO opinions discussed above as the trigger date for the initiation period to introduce a disapproval resolution and deemed such resolutions to qualify for the expedited Senate procedures. CRA Joint Resolution of Disapproval the Congressional Record. The Congress.gov website hosts databases of these executive communications that can be electronically searched. GAO also maintains on its website a database of rules it has received under the CRA. What happens if an agency does not submit a rule? In some cases, an agency has failed to submit an action to Congress, generally because the agency has not considered the action to be a rule under the CRA. On occasion when this has occurred, Members of Congress have asked GAO for a formal opinion as to whether an un-submitted action satisfies the CRA definition of a rule such that the agency would be required to comply with the CRA submission procedures. GAO has issued several opinions of this type at the request of Members. These opinions are available on GAO’s website. Although the CRA states that a joint resolution of disapproval can be introduced only after a rule is received by Congress, Members have sometimes had success in getting resolutions recognized as eligible for the CRA’s special procedures, even if the agency never submitted the rule to Congress. Specifically, the Senate has developed a practice in which the publication in the Congressional Record of a GAO opinion classifying an agency action as a rule can trigger the CRA’s special procedures for a joint resolution of disapproval. CRA Joint Resolution of Disapproval Procedures What does a joint resolution of disapproval look like? The CRA stipulates the text for a joint resolution of disapproval. Each CRA joint resolution of disapproval can be used only to invalidate one final rule in its entirety. Required Text of a CRA Joint Resolution of of Disapproval “That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the [agency] relating to [name of the rule], and such rule shall have no force or effect.” A CRA joint resolution of disapproval can only be used to invalidate one final rule in its entirety. or effect.” How is a joint resolution of disapproval filed? A CRA joint resolution of disapproval is introduced in largely the same the same way as any other bill. However, the joint resolution must be introduced within a specific time frame: during a 60-days-of 60-daysof-continuous-session period beginning on the day the rule is received by Congress. As discussed above, if the rule is not submitted, the Senate may consider the date a GAO GAO opinion finding the action to be a rule is published in the the Congressional Record as the beginning of the period. Days-of Daysof-continuous-session periods count every calendar day, including weekends and holidays, and only exclude www.crs.gov | 7-5700 The Congressional Review Act (CRA) daysexclude only days that either chamber (or both) is gone for more than three days, that is, pursuant to an adjournment resolution. https://crsreports.congress.gov The Congressional Review Act (CRA) Are there expedited procedures for a CRA joint resolution of disapproval in the House? There are no expedited procedures for initial House consideration. The joint resolution would likely be considered in the House under the terms of a closed special rule reported by the Rules Committee. A motion to recommit the joint resolution would be in order in the House, although drafting a motion that complies with the chamber’s germaneness requirement for such motions may be difficult. periods to introduce and act on a disapproval resolution described above reoccur in their entirety in the next session of Congress, beginning in each chamber on the 15th day of session. This “lookback” provision is intended to ensure that Congress will have the full periods contemplated by the act to disapprove a rule regardless of when it is received. The lookback provision may hold particular import in years in which there is a change in party control of the presidency. Are there expedited procedures for a CRA joint resolution of disapproval in the Senate? Yes. When a CRA joint disapproval resolution meets certain criteria, it cannot be filibustered in the Senate. To be eligible for these “fast track” procedures, the Senate must act on a disapproval resolution during a 60-days of Senate -of-Senate-session period, which begins on the date the rule has been submitted submitted to Congress and published in the Federal Register (if applicable). Effect of a CRA Resolution of Disapproval Committee Consideration. When introduced, a CRA disapproval resolution is referred to committee like other legislation. A committee may choose to report a CRA disapproval resolution, but it may not amend it. Any time after the After the expiration of a 20-calendar -day period beginning after the rule has been submitted to Congress and published in the Federal Register (if applicable), a Senate committee can be discharged of the further consideration of a resolution joint resolution disapproving the rule. This discharge occurs when a discharge petition is filed on the Senate floorsigned by at least 30 Senators is submitted on the floor. Senate Floor Consideration. Once a CRA joint resolution of disapproval is reported or discharged from Senate committeethe relevant Senate committee discharged, a non-debatable motion to proceed to consider the joint disapproval resolution can then be made by any Senator. If called up, the measure would be subject to up to ten10 hours of debate, before being voted upon. No amendments are permitted. All votes under the CRA are simple majority votes. Does a CRA joint resolution of disapproval have to be filed in each chamber? No. The CRA does not require that “companion” jointdisapproval resolutions of disapproval be introduced in both the House and the Senate. In some parliamentary circumstances, however, having a companion measure might be advantageous. Having a measure submitted in both the House and the Senate would enable either chamber to act first. Additionally, if the Senate passed a CRA joint resolution of disapproval, the measure would be transmitted to the House and held at the desk there. Because the Senate measure is not referred to House committee, there is no way for House supporters to force consideration of the resolution through a discharge petition. If there is a House companion, on the other hand, a discharge petition could be filed on it, which, if successful, would ultimately result in the Senate legislation being sent to the PresidentSenate. However, if the House acts first on a House sponsored CRA joint resolution of disapproval, the Senate can only consider the House measure under the “fast track” procedures described above if it first takes up its own resolution of disapproval. If there is no Senate companion bill, reaching the House received measure would effectively require unanimous consent. Therefore, House sponsors that want the chance to have their resolution be considered by the Senate under the expedited CRA procedures should ensure that a companion Senate disapproval resolution is introduced during the 60day introduction period. What happens if Congress adjourns before the CRA introduction or action periods end? If, within 60 session (Senate) or legislative (House) days of session after a rule is submitted, Congress adjourns its session sine die, the periods to introduce and act on a disapproval resolution described above “reset” in their entirety in the next session of Congress, beginning in each chamber on the 15th day of session after Congress reconvenes. This “carryover” provision is intended to ensure that Congress will have the full periods contemplated by the act to disapprove a rule regardless of when it is received. Effect of a CRA Resolution of Disapproval What happens when a CRA joint resolution of disapproval is enacted? A rule that is the subject of an enacted CRA joint resolution of disapproval “shall be treated as though such rule had never taken effect.” Can the agency promulgate the same rule again? In most circumstances, the agency may not promulgate the same rule again. A rule subject to an enacted CRA joint resolution of disapproval “may not be reissued in substantially the same form, and a new rule that is substantially the same... may not be issued, unless the reissued or new rule is specifically authorized by a law enacted after the date of the joint resolution.” However, the CRA does not define the scope of “substantially the same,” what criteria should be considered, or who should make such a determination. Is judicial review available? The CRA states that “[n]o What happens when a CRA joint resolution of disapproval is enacted? A rule that is the subject of an enacted CRA joint resolution of disapproval goes out of effect immediately if the rule had already taken effect when the resolution of disapproval is enacted and “shall be treated as though such rule had never taken effect.” If the rule has not yet gone into effect by the time the resolution of disapproval is enacted, it will not take effect. In addition, a rule subject to an enacted joint resolution of disapproval “may not be reissued in substantially the same form, and a new rule that is substantially the same ... may not be issued, unless the reissued or new rule is specifically authorized by a law enacted after the date of the joint resolution.” The CRA does not define the scope of “substantially the same” or state who should make such a determination. Is judicial review available? The CRA states that “no determination, finding, action, or omission under this chapter shall be subject to judicial review.” Two federal appeals courts and several federal district A number of courts have examined this sectionprovision. The majority view, adopted by most of these courts, including some federal appeals courts, interprets the provision as unambiguously prohibiting judicial review of any question arising under the CRA. Under this view, courts do not have the power to void may not void rules based on an agency’s noncompliance with the CRA. The minority view, adopted by one district court, interprets the provision more narrowly, concluding that it prevents review of The minority view concludes that the provision prevents review of Congress’s determinations, findings, actions, or omissions omissions made under the CRA. Under this minority view, a reviewing court has—but does not preclude review of agency actions. At least one district court held that it had the power to determine if an agency rule should have been submitted to Congress under the CRA. Previous Uses of the CRA How many rules have been overturned using the CRA? The CRA have been used to overturn a rule one time. In November 2000, the Clinton Administration’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) issued a rule on ergonomics standards. The full 60-day congressional consideration period did not elapse before the second session of the 106th Congress adjourned, and therefore the initiation and action periods reset in the new Congress. On March 20, 2001, President George W. Bush signed into law P.L. 107-5 to overturn the rule. Alissa M. Dolan, adolan@crs.loc.gov, 7-8433 (legal issues) Maeve P. Carey, mcarey@crs.loc.gov, 7-7775 (history and agency compliance) Christopher M. Davis, cmdavis@crs.loc.gov, 7-0656 (congressional procedures and day counts) www.crs.gov | 7-5700 IF10023 submitted to Congress under the CRA. CRS Products CRS Report R43992, The Congressional Review Act (CRA): Frequently Asked Questions, by Maeve P. Carey and Christopher M. Davis CRS Report R45248, The Congressional Review Act: Determining Which “Rules” Must Be Submitted to Congress, by Valerie C. Brannon and Maeve P. Carey Maeve P. Carey, Specialist in Government Organization and Management Christopher M. Davis, Analyst on Congress and the Legislative Process https://crsreports.congress.gov IF10023 The Congressional Review Act (CRA) Disclaimer This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF10023 · VERSION 7 · UPDATED