.
Federal Public Transportation Program:
In Brief
William J. Mallett
Specialist in Transportation Policy
October 1, 2014
Congressional Research Service
7-5700
www.crs.gov
R42706
c11173008
Federal Public Transportation Program: In Brief
.
Contents
Introduction...................................................................................................................................... 1
What Is Public Transportation?........................................................................................................ 1
Funding the Federal Transportation Program .................................................................................. 2
How Are Federal Dollars Spent? ..................................................................................................... 3
Program Structure ............................................................................................................................ 4
Urbanized Area Formula Program (49 U.S.C. §5307) .............................................................. 4
State of Good Repair Grant Program (49 U.S.C. §5337) .......................................................... 5
New Starts Program (49 U.S.C. §5309) .................................................................................... 6
Rural Area Formula Program (49 U.S.C. §5311) ...................................................................... 6
Bus and Bus Facilities Formula Program (49 U.S.C. §5339).................................................... 6
Federal Public Transportation Program: In Brief
December 28, 2015
(R42706)
Contents
Introduction
What Is Public Transportation?
Funding the Federal Transportation Program
How Are Federal Dollars Spent?
Program Structure
Urbanized Area Formula Program (49 U.S.C. §5307)
State of Good Repair Grant Program (49 U.S.C. §5337)
New Starts Program (49 U.S.C. §5309)
Rural Area Formula Program (49 U.S.C. §5311)
Bus and Bus Facilities Grant Program (49 U.S.C. §5339)
Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program (49 U.S.C.
§5310)..................................................................................................................................... 7
Public Transportation Safety Program (49 U.S.C. §5329) ........................................................ 7
Figures
Figure 1. Federal Public Transportation Program Funding ............................................................. 3
Figure 2. Federal Public Transportation Program Funding Shares .................................................. 5
Tables
§5310)
Public Transportation Safety Program (49 U.S.C. §5329)
Tables
Table 1. Sources of Funding for Operating and Capital Expenditures in Public
Transportation Provision, 2012..................................................................................................... 4
Appendixes
Appendix. Public Transportation Funding Authorized by MAP-21 ................................................ 8
Contacts
Author Contact Information............................................................................................................. 9
c11173008
Congressional Research Service
Federal Public Transportation Program: In Brief
.
Introduction
Transportation Provision, 2013
Introduction
Federal assistance to public transportation is provided primarily through the public transportation
program administered by the Department of Transportation
’'s Federal Transit Administration
(FTA). The federal public transportation program was authorized
through FY2014 as part of the
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21; P.L. 112-141) and extended
through May 31, 2015, as part of the Highway and Transportation Funding Act of 2014 (P.L. 113159). MAP-21 made significant modifications to the public transportation program. This report
from FY2016 through FY2020 as part of the Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act (P.L. 114-94). This report provides an introduction to the program as authorized by
MAP-21.
the FAST Act.
Major federal involvement in public transportation dates to the Urban Mass Transportation Act of
1964 (P.L. 88-365). Prior to the mid-1960s there was very little public funding of public
transportation. With much lower ridership than existed at the end of World War II and mounting
debts, however, many private transit companies were reorganized as public entities. Federal
funding was initially used to recapitalize transit systems. Today, the focus of the federal program
is still on the capital side, but the program has evolved to support operational expenses in some
circumstances, as well as safety oversight, planning, and research.
What Is Public Transportation?
Public transportation (also known as public transit, mass transit, and mass transportation) is
defined in federal law (49 U.S.C. §5302) as
"regular, continuing shared-ride surface transportation services that are open to the general
public or open to a segment of the general public defined by age, disability, or low income;
and … does not include—(i) intercity passenger rail transportation …; (ii) intercity bus
service; (iii) charter bus service; (iv) school bus service; (v) sightseeing service; (vi) courtesy
shuttle service for patrons of one or more specific establishments; or (vii) intra-terminal or
intra-facility shuttle services.
"
The main forms of public transportation are bus, heavy rail (subway and elevated), commuter rail,
light rail, paratransit (also known as demand response), and ferryboat. About
5150% of public
transportation trips are made by bus,
3536% by heavy rail, 5% by commuter rail, and 5% by light
rail (including streetcars). Paratransit accounts for about 2% of all public transportation trips, and
ferries less than 1%.
1
1
Since the end of the Second World War providers of public transportation have struggled to
maintain ridership due to a number of interrelated factors, particularly rising incomes, growing
automobile availability and use, and residential and employment decentralization. Despite the
long-term trend, ridership has risen over the past two decades from a low in 1995 of 7.8 billion
trips to 10.
6 billion trips in 2012.2
1
American Public Transportation Association, Public Transportation Fact Book 2014: Appendix A (Washington, DC,
2014), table 2, http://www.apta.com/resources/statistics/Pages/transitstats.aspx.
2
Ibid., table 1.
c11173008
Congressional Research Service
1
Federal Public Transportation Program: In Brief
.
7 billion trips in 2013.2
Public transportation accounts for about 2% of all daily trips and about 5% of commute trips.
3
3 Ridership is heavily concentrated in a few large cities and their
accompanyingsurrounding suburbs. About
75 74% of all public transportation trips are made in 10 large urbanized areas: New York, Los
Angeles, Chicago, Washington, San Francisco, Boston, Philadelphia, Seattle, Miami, and
Atlanta.
San Diego. The New York City urbanized area alone, an area that includes parts of New Jersey and
Connecticut, accounts for about 4 of every 10 public transportation trips nationally.
4
Funding the Federal Transportation Program
MAP-21 authorized $10.68 billion for the federal public transportation program in FY2013 and
$10.70 billion in FY2014. Funding made available for those years in appropriations bills was
slightly higher, $10.60 billion in FY2013 and $10.75 billion in FY2014. The Highway and
Transportation Funding Act of 2014 extends the FY2014 authorized funding level though May
31, 2015. Excluding funding provided in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA;
P.L. 111-5) and4
Funding the Federal Transportation Program
Excluding funding provided in the Disaster Relief Appropriations Act, 2013 (DRAA; P.L. 113-2), public
transportation program funding
has been between $10 billion and $11 billion since 2009 (Figure
1). ARRA provided an extra $8.4 billion in FY2009. DRAA provided $10.9 billion in FY2013 for
FTA’s Public Transportation Emergency Relief Program in response to Hurricane Sandy,
particularly to repair the damage to the public transportation systems of New York and New
Jersey. About 5% of the $10.9 billion, approximately $545 million, was subject to sequestration,
leaving about $10.3 billion for emergency reliefwas between $10 billion and $11 billion in the period FY2010 through FY2015 (Figure 1).5 The FAST Act authorized $11.8 billion in FY2016, an amount rising to $12.6 billion in FY2020. Typically about 80% of federal public
transportation program funding comes from the mass transit account of the highway trust fund
and 20% comes from the general fund of the U.S. Treasury.
ARRA and DRAA funding for public
transportation came exclusively from the general fund.
In addition to the federal public transportation program, federal funding is also available from
several surface transportation programs that allow highway money to be spent on public
transportation projects, and from non-transportation programs in areas such as health, education,
and veterans affairs. Between FY1992 and
FY2012FY2013, about $1
.1 billion a year on average was
transferred (or
“flexed”"flexed") from highway programs to public transportation.
56 The Government
Accountability Office (GAO) has identified 73 federal non-transportation programs in which
transportation is an eligible expense.
67 Although GAO could not estimate the transportation
spending in all of these programs, in 21 programs for which data were available transportation
funding amounted to $2.3 billion in FY2010.
7 The Transportation Investment Generating
3
U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Summary of Travel Trends: 2009 National
Household Travel Survey (Washington, DC, 20011), tables 9 and 25, http://nhts.ornl.gov/2009/pub/stt.pdf.
4
CRS calculation based on U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration,
Bureau of Transportation Statistics, State Transportation Statistics 2013 (Washington, DC, 2013), table 4-3,
http://www.rita.dot.gov/bts/sites/rita.dot.gov.bts/files/publications/state_transportation_statistics/
state_transportation_statistics_2013/index.html.
5
American Public Transportation Association, APTA Primer on Transit Funding, Washington, DC, August 2013, p.
66, http://www.apta.com/gap/policyresearch/Documents/APTA-Primer-Map-21-Funding.pdf.
6
U.S. Government Accountability Office, Transportation-Disadvantaged Populations: Federal Coordination Efforts
Could Be Further Strengthened, GAO-12-647, Washington, DC, 2012, http://www.gao.gov/assets/600/591707.pdf.
7
Ibid., pp. 8-10.
c11173008
Congressional Research Service
2
Federal Public Transportation Program: In Brief
.
8 The Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) program has been another source of federal funding for public
transportation over the past few years.
8
9
Figure 1. Federal Public Transportation Program Funding
12.0
10.0
Federal Public Transportation Program
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
Emergency Relief Program
Billions of Dollars
8.0
6.0
4.0
2.0
0.0
FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014
FY2010-FY2020
Source:
Senate Appropriations Reports; Federal Transit Administration; Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016 (P.L. 113-114).
How Are Federal Dollars Spent?
Senate Appropriations Reports; CRS Report R43582, Transportation, Housing and Urban Development,
and Related Agencies (THUD): FY2015 Appropriations, by Libby Perl and David Randall Peterman; CRS Report
R43156, Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies (THUD): FY2014 Appropriations, by
Libby Perl, David Randall Peterman, and Maggie McCarty.
How Are Federal Dollars Spent?
The costs of providing public transportation service fall into two main categories, operating
expenses and capital expenses. Operating expenses include vehicle operation and maintenance,
maintenance of stations and other facilities, general administration, and purchase of transportation
from private operators. Capital expenses are related to the purchase of equipment, such as buses,
rail lines, and rail stations. In general, federal public transportation programs allow an 80%
maximum matching share for capital projects and a 50% maximum share for operating expenses.
Operating costs account for about two-thirds of all costs for public transportation and capital
expenditures for about one-third. Fares and other operating revenues cover only one-quarter of
the total cost, with the remainder provided by federal, state, and local governments. The federal
8
c11173008
See http://www.dot.gov/tiger.
Congressional Research Service
3
Federal Public Transportation Program: In Brief
.
government supports less than 10% of operating expenditures, but more than 40% of capital
expenditures (Table 1
).
).
Table 1. Sources of Funding for Operating and Capital Expenditures
in Public Transportation Provision, 2012
Operating
Percent
Millions
of Dollars
Capital
Percent
Total
Millions
of Dollars
Percent
Millions
of Dollars
Fares and Other Income
37.2
$16,205
0.0
$0
26.4
$16,205
Local Government
28.4
$12,371
43.7
$7,770
32.8
$20,141
State Government
25.6
$11,139
11.9
$2,123
21.6
$13,262
8.9
$3,863
44.4
$7,907
19.2
$11,770
100.0
$43,577
100.0
$17,800
100.0
$61,377
Federal Government
Total
Source: American Public Transportation Association, 2014 Public Transportation Fact Book: Appendix A,
Washington, DC, 2014, Table 93, in Public Transportation Provision, 2013
Operating
|
Capital
|
Total
|
Percent
|
Millions of Dollars
|
Percent
|
Millions of Dollars
|
Percent
|
Millions of Dollars
|
|
Fares and Other Income
|
36.3
|
$16,734
|
0.0
|
$0
|
26.3
|
$16,734
|
|
Local Government
|
28.6
|
$13,164
|
42.0
|
$7,439
|
32.3
|
$20,603
|
|
State Government
|
26.1
|
$12,038
|
16.3
|
$2,877
|
23.4
|
$14,914
|
|
Federal Government
|
8.9
|
$4,112
|
41.7
|
$7,375
|
18.0
|
$11,487
|
|
Total
|
100.0
|
$46,048
|
100.0
|
$17,690
|
100.0
|
$63,738
|
Source: American Public Transportation Association, 2015 Public Transportation Fact Book: Appendix A, Washington, DC, 2015, Table 94, http://www.apta.com/resources/statistics/Pages/transitstats.aspx
.
.
Note: Local government outlays include funds from local taxes, toll transfers, and bond proceeds.
Program Structure
Program Structure
There are six major programs administered by FTA: (1) Urbanized Area Formula; (2) State of
Good Repair (SGR); (3) New Starts; (4) Rural Area Formula; (5) Bus and Bus Facilities
; Formula;
and (6) Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities. These are discussed in
more detail below. Funding for all of these programs, except New Starts, comes from the mass
transit account of the
highway trust fundHighway Trust Fund. New Starts funding comes from the general fund. There
are also a number of other much smaller programs (see the
Appendix Appendix for a full listing).
By far the largest program is the Urbanized Area Formula Program, accounting for
4239% of the
funding authorized (Figure 2
). About 5% ). About 5% ($519 million in FY2013 and $526 million in FY2014)
of the public transportation program funding is authorized for the Growing States and High
Density States Formula. This is not a program per se, but provides additional money to some
places and is distributed through the Urbanized and Rural Area Formula Programs. The Growing
States apportionment is based on forecasted state population growth, and the High Density
apportionment is to states with a population density greater than 370 persons per square mile.
Urbanized Area Formula Program (49 U.S.C. §5307)
The Urbanized Area Formula Grants Program provides funding for public transportation in
urbanized areas, places designated by the Census Bureau
to have a populationas having populations of 50,000 or more.
Funding was authorized at $4.
398 billion in FY2013 and $4.459 billion in FY2014. Funding
made available was $4.389 billion in FY2013 and $4.459 billion in FY2014. Growing States and
High Density States Formula funding distributed through the Urbanized Area Formula totaled
$443 million and $451 million in FY2013 and FY2014, respectively.9 Funding can be spent on
9
Federal Transit Administration, “FY2013 Apportionment Tables,” Table 1, http://www.fta.dot.gov/
(continued...)
c11173008
Congressional Research Service
4
Federal Public Transportation Program: In Brief
.
5 billion in FY2016, an amount rising to $4.9 billion in FY2020. Funding can be spent on capital, planning, job access and reverse commute projects, and, in some circumstances, operating
expenses. For urbanized areas under 200,000 the distribution of funds is based on population,
population density, and the number of low-income individuals. In addition to these factors, in
urbanized areas over 200,000 the formula is also based on bus revenue vehicle miles, bus
passenger miles, fixed guideway revenue miles, and fixed guideway route miles.
Figure 2. Federal Public Transportation Program Funding Shares
Funding Authorized, FY2013-FY2014
State of Good
Repair
20%
Urbanized Area
Formula
42%
Rural Area Formula
6%
Growing States and
High Density States
Formula
5%
Bus and Bus
Facilities Formula
4%
Elderly and Disabled
2%
Other General
Funded
2%
New Starts
18%
Other Trust Funded
1%
Funding Authorized, FY2016-FY2020
Source: Federal Transit Administration
, MAP-21 Fact Sheet: Funding Summary, http://www.fta.dot.gov/documents/
FTA_Funding_Summary_Fact_Sheet.pdf.
.
State of Good Repair Grant Program (49 U.S.C. §5337)
The State of Good Repair (SGR)
Program was created by MAP-21 to replace the Fixed
Guideway Modernization Program. The SGR Program provides funding primarily for repairing
and upgrading rail transit systems, but also other fixed-guideway systems (such as passenger
ferries and bus rapid transit) and bus systems that use high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes.
Funding for the SGR Program is
$2.136 billion in FY2013 and $2.166authorized at $2.5 billion in
FY2014, a good
deal more than the $1.667 billion allotted to the Fixed Guideway Modernization Program in
FY2012. Funding made available in FY2013 was $2.132 billion and $2.166 billion in FY2014.
(...continued)
12853_14875.html; Federal Transit Administration, “FTA Fiscal Year (FY) 2014 Apportionments, Allocations, and
Program Information,” 79 Federal Register 13462-13489, March 10, 2014.
c11173008
Congressional Research Service
5
Federal Public Transportation Program: In Brief
.
FY2016, an amount rising to $2.7 billion in FY2020.
The State of Good Repair program has two components:
•
The High Intensity Fixed Guideway SGR Program distributes 97.15% of the
funding for maintaining fixed guideway transit systems in a state of good repair.
The new formula for distributing these funds uses fixed guideway vehicle miles
and route miles for facilities that have been operating for at least seven years.
•
The High Intensity Motorbus SGR program distributes the remaining 2.85% of
the funds for bus service provided on a high occupancy vehicle (HOV) facility.
Funding is distributed by a formula that uses high-intensity bus vehicle miles and
route miles for revenue services that have been operating for at least seven years.
New Starts Program (49 U.S.C. §5309)
The New Starts Program provides funding to support construction of new rail, bus rapid transit,
and ferry systems and to expand existing systems. Funding comes from the general fund and is
authorized at $
1.907 billion for both FY2013 and FY2014, a slight reduction from the $1.955
billion authorized in FY2012. Funding appropriated was $1.855 billion in FY2013 and $1.943
billion in FY2014. Most2.3 billion for each year FY2016 through FY2020. New Starts funding is available on a competitive basis in which project
sponsors undertake a multistep process to become eligible for funding. A New Starts project must
go through three distinct stages: project development, engineering, and construction. For Small
Starts projects
,—generally those requesting $
75100 million or less in federal assistance and costing in total $
250
300 million or less
, —there are just two phases
,: project development and construction.
Rural Area Formula Program (49 U.S.C. §5311)
The Rural Area Formula Program provides funding to states and Indian tribes for public
transportation outside of urbanized areas. Capital, operating, and planning are all eligible
expenses. Funding
wasis authorized at $
600 million in FY2013 and $608 million in FY2014.
Funding made available was $598 million in FY2013 and $608 million in FY2014. Growing
States Formula funding distributed through the Rural Formula Program was $74 million in
FY2013 and $75 million in FY2014620 million in FY2016, an amount rising to $673 million in FY2020. The formula used to apportion Rural Area program funds
includes rural land area, population, vehicle revenue miles, and the number of low-income
individuals. Funds from the program are set aside for the Rural Transit Assistance Program, the
Public Transportation on Indian Reservations Program, and the Appalachian Development Public
Transportation Assistance Program.
Bus and Bus Facilities
FormulaGrant Program (49 U.S.C. §5339)
The Bus and Bus Facilities
Grant Program provides funding for capital expenses to purchase and
rehabilitate buses and to construct bus-related facilities, such as maintenance depots.
Funding for
the program was authorized at $422 million in FY2013 and $428 million in FY2014. Funding
made available was $421 million in FY2013 and $428 million in FY2014. Formerly a heavily
earmarked discretionary program, funding is now distributed by formula. After each state and
territory receives a minimum allocation ($1.25 million to states and $0.5 million to territories),
the remaining funds are distributed according to population and service levels.
c11173008
Congressional Research Service
6
Federal Public Transportation Program: In Brief
.
Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities
Program (49 U.S.C. §5310)
The FAST Act added a new competitive discretionary component to the existing formula program, increasing program funding by about $300 million per year. In FY2016, the Bus Program is authorized at $696 million in FY2016, with $428 million (61%) for formula grants and $268 million (39%) for discretionary grants. Bus Program funding increases to $809 million in FY2020, with $465 million (57%) for formula grants and $344 million (43%) for discretionary grants. The formula portion of the grant program provides each state and territory a minimum allocation ($1.75 million to states and $0.5 million to territories), with the remaining funds distributed according to population and service levels.
Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program (49 U.S.C. §5310)
The Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program provides funding to
support specialized public transportation for these population groups.
10 This program was
authorized at $
255 million in FY2013 and $258 million in FY2014. Funding made available was
$254 million in FY2013 and $258 million in FY2014263 million in FY2016, an amount that increases to $286 million in FY2020. Under the law, 60% of the funds are
apportioned to large urbanized areas, 20% to small urbanized areas, and 20% to rural areas.
Within these categories, funds are distributed to specific areas based on the relative size of their
elderly and disabled population. The program requires that projects come from a locally
developed, coordinated human services transportation plan.
The FAST Act also creates a new pilot program for innovative projects to improve the mobility of seniors and individuals with disabilities. This new program is authorized at $2 million in FY2016, an amount increasing to $3.5 million in FY2020.
Public Transportation Safety Program (49 U.S.C. §5329)
FTA had a limited
FTA's role in public transportation safety
prior to MAP-21, but several provisions in
the authorization expanded and strengthened that rolewas expanded significantly in 2012. FTA is required to develop a national
public transportation safety plan, with safety performance criteria for all modes of public
transportation and minimum performance standards for public transportation vehicles (except
commuter rail vehicles, which are regulated by the Federal Railroad Administration, or FRA).
FTA is also required to establish a certification training program for federal, state, and local
employees who conduct safety audits or are responsible for safety oversight. Recipients of
urbanized and rural formula funds may use up to 0.5% of their apportionment, with an 80%
federal share, to pay for the training program. Each public transportation agency and state is
required to establish a comprehensive safety plan. Additionally, each state with a rail system not
regulated by FRA must have a state safety oversight (SSO) program. Formula funding for the
SSO program is set aside from the Urbanized Area Formula Program and is provided with an
80% maximum federal share. FTA has authority to inspect and audit the equipment and
operations of transit agencies and may issue directives, require more frequent agency oversight,
and require that federal funding be spent to correct safety deficiencies.
10
This program combines the Elderly Individuals and Individuals with Disabilities Program and the New Freedom
Program that existed under the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users
(SAFETEA; P.L. 109-59).
c11173008
Congressional Research Service
7
Federal Public Transportation Program: In Brief
.
Appendix. Public Transportation Funding
Authorized by MAP-21
(Thousands of Dollars)
Program
Total
FY2013
FY2014
10,578,000
10,695,000
8,478,000
8,595,000
4,397,950
4,458,650
Passenger Ferry Boat Program (discretionary)
30,000
30,000
Operational Support of State Safety Oversight
21,990
22,293
2,136,300
2,165,900
2,075,415
2,104,172
High Intensity Motorbus
60,885
61,728
Rural Area Formula Program
599,500
607,800
Public Transportation on Indian Reservations
30,000
30,000
Appalachian Development Public Transportation
20,000
20,000
Rural Transportation Assistance Program (RTAP)
11,990
12,156
1,799
1,823
Growing States and High Density States Formula
518,700
525,900
Bus and Bus Facilities Formula
422,000
427,800
Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities
254,800
258,300
Planning
126,900
128,800
10,000
10,000
National Transit Institute
5,000
5,000
National Transit Database
3,850
3,850
Bus Testing Facility
3,000
3,000
2,100,000
2,100,000
1,907,000
1,907,000
104,000
104,000
70,000
70,000
45,500
45,500
7,000
7,000
Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP)
7,000
7,000
Technical Assistance and Standards Development
7,000
7,000
Human Resources and Training
5,000
5,000
Trust Funded Programs
Urbanized Area Formula Program
State of Good Repair
High Intensity Fixed Guideway
Projects of National Scope
Pilot Program for Transit Oriented Development
General Funded Programs
New Starts
FTA Administration
Research, Development, Demonstration, Deployment
Low and no emissions buses
Low/no emissions bus facilities and equipment
Emergency Relief Program
such sums as are necessary
Source: Federal Transit Administration, MAP-21 Fact Sheet: Funding Summary, http://www.fta.dot.gov/documents/
FTA_Funding_Summary_Fact_Sheet.pdf.
c11173008
Congressional Research Service
8
Federal Public Transportation Program: In Brief
.
Author Contact Information
William J. Mallett
Specialist in Transportation Policy
wmallett@crs.loc.gov, 7-2216
c11173008
Congressional Research Service
9
The FAST Act clarified that FTA has the authority to temporarily administer a SSO program if it considers a state-run program inadequate. The FAST Act also authorized $199 million in FY2017 for costs associated with the installation of positive train control by public transportation agencies. Positive train control, a safety system, is mandated to be installed on all commuter rail lines by the end of 2018.
Public Transportation Funding Authorized by the FAST Act
FY2016
|
FY2017
|
FY2018
|
FY2019
|
FY2020
|
Total
|
|
Trust Funded Programs
|
9,347,604,639
|
9,733,706,043
|
9,733,353,407
|
9,939,380,030
|
10,150,348,462
|
|
Urbanized Area Formula Grants
|
4,538,905,700
|
4,629,683,814
|
4,726,907,174
|
4,827,117,606
|
4,929,452,499
|
|
Operational Support of State Safety Oversight
|
22,694,529
|
23,148,419
|
23,634,536
|
24,135,588
|
24,647,262
|
Passenger Ferry Boat Program
|
30,000,000
|
30,000,000
|
30,000,000
|
30,000,000
|
State of Good Repair Grants
|
2,549,670,000
|
2,593,703,558
|
2,638,366,859
|
2,683,798,369
|
High Intensity Fixed Guideway Formula
|
2,477,004,405
|
2,519,783,006
|
2,563,173,403
|
2,607,310,115
|
|
High Intensity Motorbus State of Good Repair
|
71,449,500
|
72,665,595
|
73,920,551
|
75,193,455
|
76,488,254
|
|
Bus and Bus Facilities Grants
|
695,800,000
|
719,956,000
|
747,033,476
|
777,024,469
|
808,653,915
|
|
Bus and Bus Facilities Formula Grants
|
427,800,000
|
436,356,000
|
445,519,476
|
454,964,489
|
464,609,736
|
|
Competitive Grants
|
268,000,000
|
283,600,000
|
301,514,000
|
322,059,980
|
344,044,179
|
|
Formula Grants for Rural Areas
|
619,956,000
|
632,355,120
|
645,634,578
|
659,322,031
|
673,299,658
|
|
Public Transportation on Indian Reservations Formula
|
30,000,000
|
30,000,000
|
30,000,000
|
30,000,000
|
30,000,000
|
|
Public Transportation on Indian Reservations Competitive
|
5,000,000
|
5,000,000
|
5,000,000
|
5,000,000
|
5,000,000
|
Appalachian Development Public Transportation Assistance Program
20,000,000
|
20,000,000
|
20,000,000
|
20,000,000
|
20,000,000
|
|
Projects of National Scope
|
1,859,868
|
1,897,065
|
1,936,904
|
1,977,966
|
2,019,899
|
|
Rural Transportation Assistance Program
|
12,399,120
|
12,647,102
|
12,912,692
|
13,186,441
|
13,465,993
|
|
Growing States and High Density States Formula
|
536,261,539
|
544,433,788
|
552,783,547
|
561,315,120
|
570,032,917
|
|
Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities
|
262,949,400
|
268,208,388
|
273,840,764
|
279,646,188
|
285,574,688
|
|
Planning Programs
|
130,732,000
|
133,398,933
|
136,200,310
|
139,087,757
|
142,036,417
|
|
Public Transportation Innovation
|
28,000,000
|
28,000,000
|
28,000,000
|
28,000,000
|
28,000,000
|
|
Pilot Program for Transit Oriented Development Planning
|
10,000,000
|
10,000,000
|
10,000,000
|
10,000,000
|
10,000,000
|
|
Technical Assistance and Workforce Development
|
9,000,000
|
9,000,000
|
9,000,000
|
9,000,000
|
9,000,000
|
|
National Transit Institute
|
5,000,000
|
5,000,000
|
5,000,000
|
5,000,000
|
5,000,000
|
|
National Transit Database
|
4,000,000
|
4,000,000
|
4,000,000
|
4,000,000
|
4,000,000
|
|
Bus Testing Facility
|
3,000,000
|
3,000,000
|
3,000,000
|
3,000,000
|
3,000,000
|
|
Pilot Program for Enhanced Mobility
|
2,000,000
|
3,000,000
|
3,250,000
|
3,500,000
|
3,500,000
|
|
Positive Train Control
|
0
|
199,000,000
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
General Funded Programs
|
2,441,802,303
|
2,441,802,303
|
2,441,802,303
|
2,441,802,303
|
2,441,802,303
|
|
Capital Investment Grants
|
2,301,785,760
|
2,301,785,760
|
2,301,785,760
|
2,301,785,760
|
2,301,785,760
|
|
Administrative Expenses
|
115,016,543
|
115,016,543
|
115,016,543
|
115,016,543
|
115,016,543
|
|
Safety Oversight
|
5,000,000
|
5,000,000
|
5,000,000
|
5,000,000
|
5,000,000
|
|
Transit Asset Management
|
2,000,000
|
2,000,000
|
2,000,000
|
2,000,000
|
2,000,000
|
|
Research, Development, Demonstration, and Deployment Program
|
20,000,000
|
20,000,000
|
20,000,000
|
20,000,000
|
20,000,000
|
|
Technical Assistance and Training
|
5,000,000
|
5,000,000
|
5,000,000
|
5,000,000
|
5,000,000
|
|
Emergency Relief
|
such sums as are necessary
|
Source: Federal Transit Administration.
Author Contact Information
[author name scrubbed], Specialist in Transportation Policy
([email address scrubbed], [phone number scrubbed])
Footnotes
| 1.
|
American Public Transportation Association, Public Transportation Fact Book 2015: Appendix A (Washington, DC, 2015), table 2, http://www.apta.com/resources/statistics/Pages/transitstats.aspx.
|
| 2.
|
Ibid., table 1.
|
| 3.
|
U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Summary of Travel Trends: 2009 National Household Travel Survey (Washington, DC, 20011), tables 9 and 25, http://nhts.ornl.gov/2009/pub/stt.pdf.
|
| 4.
|
CRS calculation based on U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, State Transportation Statistics 2015 (Washington, DC, 2015), table 4-3, http://www.rita.dot.gov/bts/sites/rita.dot.gov.bts/files/publications/state_transportation_statistics/state_transportation_statistics_2015/index.html.
|
| 5.
|
DRAA provided $10.9 billion in FY2013 for FTA's Public Transportation Emergency Relief Program in response to Hurricane Sandy, particularly to repair the damage to the public transportation systems of New York and New Jersey. About 5% of the $10.9 billion—approximately $545 million—was subject to sequestration, leaving about $10.3 billion for emergency relief.
|
| 6.
|
American Public Transportation Association, APTA Primer on Transit Funding, Washington, DC, September 2015, p. 77, http://www.apta.com/gap/legissues/authorization/Pages/default.aspx..
|
| 7.
|
U.S. Government Accountability Office, Transportation-Disadvantaged Populations: Federal Coordination Efforts Could Be Further Strengthened, GAO-12-647, Washington, DC, 2012, http://www.gao.gov/assets/600/591707.pdf.
|
| 8.
|
Ibid., pp. 8-10.
|
| 9.
|
See http://www.dot.gov/tiger.
|