< Back to Current Version

Appropriations for the Bureau of Prisons (BOP): In Brief

Changes from March 4, 2014 to May 19, 2016

This page shows textual changes in the document between the two versions indicated in the dates above. Textual matter removed in the later version is indicated with red strikethrough and textual matter added in the later version is indicated with blue.



Contents

Summary

The Bureau of Prisons (BOP) was established in 1930 to house federal inmates, professionalize the prison service, and ensure consistent and centralized administration of the federal prison system. The BOP is the largest correctional agency in the country,BOP, by Decision Unit, FY1999-FY2015

  • Table B-1. Per Capita Cost of Incarceration in the Federal Prison System, FY2000-FY2015
  • Summary

    The Bureau of Prisons (BOP) is the largest correctional agency in the country in terms of the number of prisoners under its jurisdiction. The BOP must confine any offender convicted and sentenced to a term of imprisonment in a federal court.

    All BOP correctional facilities are classified according to one of five different security levels: minimum, low, medium, high, or administrative. An inmate's designation to a particular institution is based primarily on the level of security and supervision the inmate requires; the level of security and staff supervision the institution is able to provide; and the inmate's program needs. All inmates undergo a comprehensive intake screening when they are admitted to a BOP facility. The BOP provides health care for all inmates either through each prison's ambulatory care clinics or by contracting for services through local hospitals. The BOP also provides mental health treatment to inmates who demonstrate a need for it through staff psychologists. The BOP has an established inmate disciplinary system, whereby sanctions are imposed on inmates for committing prohibited acts. An inmate is allowed to request a review of his or her conditions of confinement through the BOP's Administrative Remedy Program. Inmates have access to a variety of rehabilitational programs including education programs, substance abuse treatment, vocational education, and work opportunities. In order to help aid an inmate's transition back into the community, inmates can be placed in a Residential Reentry Center (i.e., a halfway house) for a period of time before their sentence expires.

    Changes in federal criminal justice policy since the early 1980s have resulted in a continued increase in the federal prison population. The number of inmates under the BOP's jurisdiction has increased nearly eight-fold (790%) from approximately 24,600 inmates in FY1980 to nearly 219,300 inmates in FY2013. Since FY1980, the federal prison population has increased, on average, by approximately 5,900 inmates each year.

    The burgeoning federal prison population has led Congress to increase appropriations for the BOP's operations and infrastructure. In FY1980, Congress appropriated $330.0 million for the BOP. By FY2014, the total appropriation for the BOP reached $6.859 billion. The additional funding for the BOP was necessary to cover the costs of providing services to a growing prison population, expanding prison capacity, and hiring additional staff to manage the expanding federal prison system.

    The annual growth in the federal prison population has outstripped the BOP's prison capacity, resulting in overcrowding in the federal prison system. Congress could choose to mitigate some of the issues related to federal prison population growth by appropriating more funding so the BOP could hire additional staff and expand prison capacity to alleviate overcrowding. On the other hand, Congress could also consider ways to reduce the number of inmates held in federal prison by considering alternatives to incarceration, such as increasing good time credit for inmates who participate in certain rehabilitative programs, placing more low-level offenders on community supervision in lieu of incarceration, or reducing mandatory minimum penalties for some offenses.


    The Bureau of Prisons (BOP): Operations and Budget

    Introduction

    The Bureau of Prisons (BOP) is the largest correctional agency in the country, in terms of the number of prisoners under its jurisdiction.1 The

    Changes in federal criminal justice policy since the early 1980s spurred growth in the federal prison population. The total number of inmates under BOP's jurisdiction increased from approximately 25,000 in FY1980 to over 205,000 in FY2015. The sustained growth in the federal prison population has necessitated an increase in appropriations for BOP's operations and infrastructure.

    BOP's appropriations increased by nearly $7.149 billion from FY1980 ($330 million) to FY2016 ($7.479 billion). Between FY1980 and FY2016, the average annual increase in BOP's appropriations was approximately $199 million. The nearly continuous increase in BOP's appropriations is in large part driven by an unbroken year-by-year increase in BOP's Salaries and Expenses (S&E) account. A significant share of BOP's S&E funding has been dedicated to providing for the care and security of inmates housed in BOP facilities, though an increasing share of S&E funding has been dedicated to contracting for additional bedspace in private prisons and Residential Reentry Centers (i.e., halfway houses).

    A comparison of requested and enacted funding for BOP's S&E and Buildings and Facilities (B&F) accounts shows that Congress has been somewhat more likely to fund the Administration's request for prison construction and less likely to fully fund the Administration's request for the upkeep and care of the prison population. In the 37 fiscal years between FY1980 and FY2016, appropriations were lower than the Administration's request for the B&F account 16 times. Appropriations were lower than the request for the S&E account 23 times.

    The overall nominal per capita cost of incarcerating an inmate in the federal system has steadily increased from FY2000 to FY2015, from approximately $22,000 per inmate to nearly $32,000 per inmate. However, after adjusting for inflation, the overall cost of incarceration has been relatively flat since FY2000. This suggests that increases in BOP's appropriations are, in part, attributable to the growing number of inmates BOP has to incarcerate rather than increasing costs per inmate.

    One concern among some policymakers is that BOP's expanding budget is starting to consume a larger share of the Department of Justice's (DOJ) overall annual appropriations. A review of funding for DOJ and BOP show that since FY1980 both BOP's total budget and the S&E account have, in general, encompassed a growing share of DOJ's annual appropriations.

    Appropriations for the Bureau of Prisons (BOP): In Brief
    The Bureau of Prisons (BOP) is the largest correctional agency in the country in terms of the number of prisoners under its jurisdiction.1 BOP was established in 1930 to house federal inmates, professionalize the prison service, and ensure consistent and centralized administration of the federal prison system.2 BOP must confine any offender convicted and sentenced to a term of imprisonment in a federal court.

    Changes in federal criminal justice policy since the early 1980s—enforcing a growing number of federal crimes, replacing indeterminate sentencing with a determinate sentencing structure through sentencing guidelines, and increasing the number of federal offenses subject to mandatory minimum sentences—have led to continued rapid growth in the federal prison population. The total number of inmates under the BOP's jurisdiction has increased from approximately 24,600 inmates in FY1980 to nearly 219,300 inmates in FY2013. Since FY198025,000 in FY1980 to over 205,000 in FY2015.3 Between FY1980 and FY2013, the federal prison population has increased, on average, by approximately 5,900 inmates each year.

    The burgeoning federal prison population has led Congress to increase appropriations for the annually. However, the number of inmates in the federal prison system has decreased in each of the past two fiscal years. The annual growth in the federal prison population has necessitated an increase in appropriations for BOP's operations and infrastructure. In FY1980, Congress appropriated $330.0 million for the BOP; by FY2014FY2016, the total appropriation for the BOP reached $6.859 billion (see Figure 1). Even after adjusting for inflation, the BOP's budget increased by nearly $173.2 million per year between FY1980 and FY2014.2

    The annual growth in the federal prison population has outstripped the BOP's current capacity, resulting in overcrowding in the federal prison system. The BOP reports that at the end of FY2013, the federal prison system was operating at 36% over rated capacity.3 Congress could choose to mitigate some issues related to federal prison population growth by appropriating more funding so the BOP could hire additional staff and expand prison capacity to alleviate overcrowding. On the other hand, Congress could also consider ways to reduce the number of inmates held in federal prison by considering alternatives to incarceration, such as increasing good time credit for inmates who participate in certain rehabilitative programs, placing more low-level offenders on community supervision in lieu of incarceration, or reducing mandatory minimum penalties for some offenses.

    This report provides an overview of how the BOP manages the growing federal prison population and examines the BOP's appropriations since FY1980.

    Figure 1. Nominal and Inflation-Adjusted Appropriations for the Bureau of Prisons, FY1980-FY2014

    BOP reached $7.479 billion.

    This report provides an overview of BOP's appropriations since FY1980. Specifically, this report examines trends in BOP's total appropriations, changes in funding for BOP's appropriations account, and trends in funding for the decision units under BOP's appropriations accounts. The report provides a brief analysis of how the Administration's requested funding for BOP compares to enacted appropriations. It also discusses changes in the per capita cost of incarceration and how appropriations for BOP have changed relative to those for the Department of Justice, both issues that have been of interest to policymakers.

    Appropriations for BOP Trends in BOP's Total Appropriations As shown in Figure 1, BOP's appropriations increased by nearly $7.149 billion from FY1980 to FY2016. Between FY1980 and FY2016, the average annual increase in BOP's appropriations was approximately $199 million. The increasing appropriations for BOP coincided with the steady increase in the number of inmates under BOP's jurisdiction. Figure 1 also shows that BOP's appropriations have increased at a rate that is significantly greater than inflation. In inflation-adjusted dollars, BOP's appropriations increased 783% between FY1980 and FY2016.

    It has been argued that even though appropriations for BOP are discretionary, they are effectively mandatory because "[b]y law, the BOP must accept and provide for all [f]ederal inmates, including but not limited to inmate care, custodial staff, contract beds, food, and medical costs. BOP cannot control the number of inmates sentenced to prison, and unlike other [f]ederal agencies, cannot limit assigned workloads and thereby control operating costs."4

    Figure 1. Nominal and Adjusted Appropriations for the Bureau of Prisons, FY1980-FY2016

    Appropriations in billions of dollars

    Source: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons.

    Notes: Nominal appropriations were adjusted for inflation using data from the Consumer Price Index for All
    Urban Consumers (CPI-U). Inflation-adjusted amounts are presented in FY2014 dollars. The Consumer Price
    Index for FY2014 was based on the Congressional Budget Office's projected increase in inflation (taken from
    Table G-2 in The Budget and Economic Outlook: Fiscal Years 2014 to 2024). The spike in the the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) Chained Price Index presented in Table 10.1 of the FY2017 Budget of the U.S. Government. Inflation-adjusted amounts are presented in FY2016 dollars. The spike in BOP's funding for
    FY1990 was the result of Congress appropriating $1.512 billion for the B&F account (see Table A-1). The FY2013
    enacted amount includesreflects the amount sequestered per the Budget Control Act of 2011(P.L. 112-25).

    BOP Operations

    The BOP was established in 1930 to house federal inmates, professionalize the prison service, and ensure consistent and centralized administration of the federal prison system.4 Congress has continued to modify the responsibilities of the BOP since its founding. Currently, the BOP has several congressionally mandated obligations, including

    • managing and regulating all federal correctional institutions;
    • providing suitable quarters and for the safekeeping, care, and subsistence of all persons charged with or convicted of federal crimes, or held as witnesses;
    • providing for the protection, instruction, and discipline of all persons charged with or convicted of federal crimes; and
    • preparing inmates for reentry after serving a term of incarceration.5

    The sections below provide an overview of how the BOP operates the federal prison system in order to meet its responsibilities.

    Managing Federal Correctional Facilities

    All BOP correctional facilities are classified according to one of five different security levels: minimum, low, medium, high, or administrative. In general, high security facilities are referred to as U.S. Penitentiaries (USP),6 medium and low security facilities are called Federal Correctional Institutions (FCIs), and minimum security facilities are known as Federal Prison Camps (FPC).7 Federal Correctional Complexes (FCC) house more than one type of institution on the same grounds.8 Administrative facilities are facilities with specialized missions (i.e., pretrial detention centers, which hold inmates who are on or awaiting trial; and medical referral centers, which hold inmates who need specialized medical care) and are capable of confining inmates at all security levels.9 A facility's security level is based on the facility's features, which include the presence of external patrols, towers, security barriers, or detection devices; the type of housing within the institution; internal security features; and the staff-to-inmate ratio.10

    After an offender is sentenced and remanded to the custody of the BOP by the U.S. courts to serve a period of incarceration, the BOP assigns the new inmate to one of its facilities. All assignments are conducted by the Designation and Sentence Computation Center (DSCC). All federal inmates are assigned both a security and medical classification and then assigned to an institution with a commensurate security level (i.e., minimum, low, medium, high, or administrative) and medical care level (i.e., Care Level I through IV, see below). An inmate's assignment to a particular institution is based primarily on

    • the level of security and supervision the inmate requires;
    • the level of security and staff supervision the institution is able to provide; and
    • the inmate's program needs (i.e., sex offender, substance abuse treatment, educational/vocational training, individual counseling, group counseling, or medical/mental health treatment).11

    Other factors that might influence the initial designation for an inmate include

    • the inmate's release residence;12
    • the level of overcrowding at an institution;
    • any security, location, or program recommendations made by the sentencing court; and
    • any additional security measures to ensure the protection of victims or witnesses and the public in general.13

    Inmates can be reclassified and reassigned to a new facility based on a review by the DSCC at the request of the staff at the institution where the inmate is incarcerated. Inmates are also assigned custody levels (i.e., community, out, in, or maximum) in addition to their security classifications.14 Each custody level dictates the amount of staff supervision the inmate requires.15 An inmate's custody classification is based on the inmate's criminal history, current offense, and institutional adjustment.16 An inmate's custody level is routinely reviewed and often changes during the period of incarceration.

    The BOP considers proper management of the housing units in each facility to be one of the hallmarks of its inmate management philosophy.17 Unit staff (e.g., the unit manager, case manager, and correctional counselor) have offices in inmate living units. This management structure facilitates regular contact between staff and inmates and allows BOP employees to identify inmate concerns and potential problems.18 Unit staff are responsible for involving the inmates housed in their units in programs designed to meet their needs (see below). Unit staff meet with inmates on a regular basis to develop, review, and discuss their work assignments, program opportunities, and progress, as well as to address any other concerns the inmate might have.19

    Providing for the Safekeeping, Care, and Subsistence of Inmates

    All inmates undergo a comprehensive intake screening when they are admitted to a BOP facility. The intake screening includes

    • conducting a social screening;
    • administering a physical examination;
    • screening for tuberculosis and other contagious diseases;
    • assessing suicide risk and mental health;
    • recording a history of current and prior medical conditions;
    • performing a dental screening;
    • dispensing appropriate and necessary medications;
    • ordering appropriate tests;
    • collecting DNA for inclusion in the National DNA database; and
    • developing a medical treatment plan, if needed.20

    After intake, newly admitted inmates complete an Admission and Orientation (A&O) program.21 Each institution's A&O program provides inmates with information on

    • the inmate's rights and responsibilities;
    • the institution's programs; and
    • the institution's disciplinary system.22

    The program also provides institutional staff with an opportunity to identify and assist inmates who may be experiencing difficulty with adjusting to being incarcerated.23

    Each inmate is assigned a "Care Level" based on the level of health care the inmate requires. Care Levels range from Care Level I, which is assigned to inmates with no health care needs or needs that are easily managed, to Care Level IV, which is assigned to inmates with complicated medical needs that may require hospitalization. BOP then ensures that inmates are assigned to a facility that is able to care for an inmate's specific health care needs or is in close proximity to a community hospital that may provide the appropriate health care.

    All BOP facilities operate outpatient ambulatory care clinics.24 In instances where inmates have an emergency medical situation that cannot be treated at the facility, they are transported to the nearest community hospital emergency department.25 The BOP contracts with local hospitals to provide care to inmates who cannot be cared for in the facility's clinic. Each BOP facility solicits medical contracts that cover health care facility and physician services. Institutions may solicit comprehensive contracts in which costs are based on the prevailing Operating Federal Medicare rate for the applicable area for inpatient facility services, and the prevailing Medicare fee schedule amounts for the geographic area for outpatient and physician services.26 In cases where comprehensive medical contracts are not available, institutions may use blanket purchase agreements for a negotiated rate, but the rate may not be benchmarked to prevailing Medicare rates.27 The BOP operates six medical referral centers that provide care to inmates with a variety of chronic and sub-acute medical and psychiatric conditions.28

    The BOP also provides a variety of mental health services through staff psychologists and psychiatrists, including formal counseling and treatment on an individual or group basis.29 The BOP's policies dictate that all inmates receive an initial mental health screening (which consists of psychological interviews, social history reviews, and behavioral observation) upon admission to a BOP facility.30 The purpose of the interview is to

    • identify inmates who need referral for mental health, sex offender, or substance abuse treatment services;
    • collect information that can be used in future crisis counseling situations;
    • identify strengths as well as potential adjustment problems to incarceration; and
    • discuss possible programmatic needs with inmates.31

    Inmates with acute mental illness may receive psychiatric services within one of the BOP's medical referral centers, but most mental health treatment is provided in regular BOP facilities.32

    Providing for the Protection, Instruction, and Discipline of Inmates

    The BOP has an established inmate disciplinary system whereby sanctions are imposed on inmates for committing prohibited acts. Prohibited acts are divided into four categories based on severity: greatest, high, moderate, and low.33 Penalties for committing a prohibited act include losing good time credit,34 placement in disciplinary segregation, fines, or the loss of privileges.35 The severity of the penalty is based on the severity of the offense the inmate committed.36 Incidents are resolved by either a Unit Disciplinary Committee (UDC) or a Disciplinary Hearing Officer (DHO). Allegations of misconduct are initially reviewed by a UDC. If the UDC determines that the inmate committed the prohibited act(s), the committee can impose any authorized sanction other than the loss of good time credit, disciplinary segregation, or fines. Inmates are allowed to appear before the UDC (unless it would jeopardize institutional security), where they can make a statement and present documentary evidence on their behalves.

    The DHO is an independent officer who holds hearings and imposes sanctions for incidents of misconduct. The DHO can only hold hearings on cases referred by the UDC. All inmates charged with the two highest levels of prohibited acts (i.e., "greatest" or "high") or who are facing the loss of good time credit as a mandatory sanction have their cases forwarded to a DHO. In addition, the UDC, at its discretion, can forward a case to the DHO based on the seriousness of the charges. Accused inmates are allowed to appear at a DHO hearing (unless it would jeopardize institutional security) and they are permitted to have a staff representative to assist them at the hearing. Like a hearing before the UDC, inmates are allowed to make a statement and present documentary evidence on their behalves; however, the DHO can call and question witnesses, and inmates can request that witnesses appear at the hearing to testify on their behalves. If the DHO determines that the inmate committed the prohibited act(s), the DHO can impose any authorized sanction. Misconduct that rises to the level of criminal behavior is referred to the United States Attorneys for prosecution.

    At times, inmates might be placed in the institution's Special Housing Unit (SHU) in order to ensure the safe, secure, and orderly operation of the facility.37 Inmates placed in the SHU are separated from the general population. Inmates in the SHU are either on administrative detention status, which is non-punitive and includes inmates placed in segregation to protect them from other inmates, or disciplinary segregation status, which is punitive and is a sanction for violating regulations concerning inmate behavior. An inmate's status is reviewed regularly by BOP while he or she is housed in the SHU.

    In some instances, inmates who demonstrate that they are unable or unwilling to comply with institutional rules and who engage in repeated acts of serious misconduct are transferred to Special Management Units (SMUs). Currently, five BOP facilities have SMUs.38 Transfer to a SMU is non-punitive and is meant to help inmates habituate so that they can be returned to the general population without posing a threat to the safe, secure, and orderly operations of BOP correctional facilities and the public.39 Candidates for transfer to a SMU are inmates who

    • participated or had a leadership role in a disruptive group or gang;
    • have a history of serious and/or disruptive disciplinary infractions;
    • committed a serious institutional violation while a member of a disruptive group or gang;
    • participated in, organized, or facilitated any group misconduct that adversely affected the operations of a correctional facility; or
    • otherwise participated in or was associated with activity such that the inmate requires a higher level of supervision to ensure the safety, security, and orderly operation of BOP facilities, or protection of the public.40

    Inmates are expected to complete the four-level SMU program in 18-24 months, though inmates who continue to demonstrate disruptive conduct can be held in a SMU beyond 24 months.41 When inmates complete the program they are returned to the general population at another facility that is appropriate for their security and supervision level. Inmates housed in SMUs are separated from the general inmate population in the facility, and their movements and interaction with other inmates are more controlled and restricted than they would be if they were housed in the general population, but they are granted more freedom of movement as they progress through the levels of the program.42 Inmates also have access to rehabilitative programming while in a SMU, albeit with some restrictions.43

    In addition to SMUs, the BOP also operates Communications Management Units (CMUs) at two facilities.44 Inmates housed in CMUs are subject to increased monitoring of their communications with persons in the community.45 Like SMUs, inmates housed in CMUs are separated from the general inmate population, but inmates' movements are not as restricted and controlled as they would be in a SMU.46 Examples of inmates who might be housed in a CMU include inmates who

    • have a history of or a nexus to international or domestic terrorism;
    • repeatedly attempt to contact their victims;
    • attempt to coordinate illegal activities via approved communication methods (e.g., mail, telephone calls, or meetings with visitors) while incarcerated; or
    • have received disciplinary actions due to their continued abuse of approved communication methods.47

    An inmate is allowed to request a review of his or her conditions of confinement through the BOP's Administrative Remedy Program. Before an inmate can submit a formal request for an administrative remedy, the inmate is ordinarily required to present the issue informally to staff, and staff must attempt to remedy the issue.48 Formal requests for administrative remedies are first reviewed and investigated at the institutional level. Wardens can also waive the requirement for inmates to first attempt to resolve the issue informally if the warden determines that the sensitivity of the issue makes informal resolution inappropriate.49 If an inmate is not satisfied with the warden's response, he or she can appeal the claim to the regional office; and if the inmate is not satisfied with the regional office's response, he or she can appeal to the central office.50 Inmates can appeal rejections of claims through the same process. Inmates may file appeals of disciplinary actions (e.g., confinement in a SHU) directly with the regional office. Inmates can submit a formal request for an administrative remedy directly to the regional office if the inmate reasonably believes the issue is sensitive and his or her safety would be in jeopardy if someone in the institution was aware that the inmate was pursuing a claim.51

    Preparing Inmates for Reentry

    The BOP offers a variety of rehabilitative programs to federal inmates, including

    • mental health, sex offender, and substance abuse treatment;
    • educational programming;
    • vocational education;
    • work opportunities through prison work assignments and the Federal Prison Industries (FPI);52
    • parenting programs;
    • cognitive-behavioral interventions that focus on promoting pro-social behavior; and
    • religious programs.53

    The BOP has developed a coordinated prisoner reentry strategy. The strategy involves assessing each inmate's strengths and weaknesses as they relate to the inmate's readiness for release, using the assessment to develop a skill development plan, and linking inmates with certain deficiencies to programs to address those needs.54 The BOP also collaborates with other agencies to ensure that inmates with certain needs are provided targeted services.55

    In addition to the rehabilitative programming offered to federal inmates, the BOP has a release preparation program for inmates who are within 18 months of release. The program includes classes on résumé writing and job search and retention skills.56 The BOP's Inmate Transition Branch (ITB) provides inmates with pre-release employment assistance. The ITB holds mock job fairs in BOP facilities to provide inmates with an opportunity to test their job interview skills and to put inmates in touch with potential post-release employers.57 The ITB also helps inmates prepare release folders that contain a résumé, education certificates, diplomas, transcripts, and other documentation that might be required during a job interview.58

    The BOP contracts for Residential Reentry Centers (RRCs, i.e., halfway houses) to provide assistance to inmates nearing release.59 RRCs provide inmates with a structured and supervised environment along with employment counseling, job placement services, financial management assistance, and other community-based social services and programs.60 RRCs facilitate inmates' efforts at reestablishing ties to the community while allowing staff at the RRC to supervise inmates' activities. Pre-release inmates placed in a RRC remain under the jurisdiction of BOP until their sentences are completed. Inmates are expected to be employed in a full-time job within 15 days of arriving at a RRC and 25% of their gross income (not to exceed the negotiated per diem rate under the contract the BOP signed with the RRC) goes to a subsistence fee paid directly to the RRC contractor to contribute toward the cost of their confinement.61 RRC staff can assist inmates with obtaining employment or locating post-release housing.62 While housed in RRCs, inmates are eligible to receive mental health, sex offender, and substance abuse treatment services. Inmates who completed a residential substance abuse treatment program while incarcerated are required to participate in a transitional drug abuse treatment program while placed at a RRC.63

    BOP Appropriations

    Nearly all of the BOP's operations are funded through annual appropriations provided by Congress.64 The BOP's annual budget is divided between two major accounts: Salaries and Expenses (S&E) and Buildings and Facilities (B&F). The S&E account (i.e., the operating budget) provides for the custody and care of federal inmates and for the daily maintenance and operations of correctional facilities, regional offices, and the BOP's central office in Washington, DC. It also provides funding for the incarceration of federal inmates in state, local, and private facilities. The B&F account (i.e., the capital budget) provides funding for the construction of new facilities and the modernization, repair, and expansion of existing facilities.65 Appropriations for both accounts are presented in Table 1.

    Table 1. Appropriations for the Bureau of Prisons, FY1980-FY2014

    Appropriations in thousands of dollars

    Per Capita Cost of Incarceration While it is not surprising that BOP's annual appropriations would increase along with the prison population—after all, more inmates require more care and supervision, which requires additional funding—the per capita cost of housing inmates has not fluctuated too much since FY2000 when adjusting for inflation. The overall nominal per capita cost of incarcerating an inmate in the federal system has steadily increased from FY2000 to FY2015 (see Figure 4). Over this time period, the cost of incarceration rose from approximately $22,000 per inmate to nearly $32,000 per inmate, an increase of 48%.

    The increasing per capita cost of confinement is largely due to inflationary pressures, such as the increasing cost of health care, food, clothing, and utilities and the cost of hiring additional personnel to properly manage the inmate population.

    Figure 4. Per Capita Cost of Incarceration, FY2000-FY2015

    When adjusted for inflation, the per capita cost of incarceration has been relatively flat since FY2000. As discussed above, BOP's appropriations have increased significantly since FY2000, slightly more than doubling since then. However, the inflation-adjusted per capita cost of incarceration has increased 10% over that same time period. The fact that BOP's nominal appropriations continued to increase while per capita costs remained relatively flat in real terms suggests that increases in BOP's appropriations are, in part, attributable to the growing number of inmates BOP has to incarcerate rather than increasing per-inmate costs.

    Appropriations for BOP Relative to Those for the Department of Justice One concern among some policymakers is that BOP's expanding budget is starting to consume a larger share of the Department of Justice's (DOJ) overall annual appropriations. Figure 5 shows what proportion of DOJ's annual discretionary budget was dedicated to BOP. BOP's overall budget is more susceptible to fluctuations due to changes in year-to-year appropriations for BOP's B&F account. The trend lines show that since FY1980, both BOP's total budget and the S&E account have, in general, encompassed a growing share of DOJ's annual appropriations, though the trend lines also indicate that BOP's share of DOJ's annual appropriations has not increased markedly. The noticeable spike in BOP's share of DOJ's annual appropriations in FY1990 was the result of Congress appropriating more than $1 billion for the B&F account. In addition, the decrease in BOP's share of DOJ's appropriations observed in FY2009, a break in a general upward trend that started in FY2000, was the result of Congress appropriating an additional $4 billion for DOJ under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (P.L. 111-5).

    Figure 5. BOP's Appropriation as a Share of DOJ's Discretionary Budget Authority, FY1980-FY2016 Appendix A. BOP Appropriations: Total and by Decision Unit Table A-1. Requested and Enacted Appropriations for the Bureau of Prisons, FY1980-FY2016

    Appropriations in thousands of dollars

     

    535,070

    412,133

    536,932

    561,480

    767,454

    772,013

    962,016

    1,138,778

    1,363,645

    1,649,121

    1,793,470

    1,962,605

    2,319,722

    2,977,645

    2,748,427b

    2,847,777c

    3,446,491

    3,750,719

    3,469,739

    3,805,118

    4,605,068

    4,865,114

    4,571,385

    4,830,160

    5,104,161

    5,346,740

    5,600,792

    6,076,575

    6,282,410

    6,824,200

    6,919,406

    Fiscal Year

    Salaries and Expenses

    Buildings and Facilities

    Total

    1980

    $323,884

    $5,960

    $329,844

    1981

    351,759

    10,020

    361,779

    1982

    378,016

    56,481

    434,497

    1983

    Trends in BOP Appropriations by Account

    Nearly all of BOP's operations are funded through annual appropriations provided by Congress.5 BOP's annual budget is divided between two major accounts: Salaries and Expenses (S&E) and Buildings and Facilities (B&F). The S&E account (i.e., the operating budget) provides for the custody and care of federal inmates and for the daily maintenance and operations of correctional facilities, regional offices, and BOP's central office in Washington, DC. It also provides funding for the incarceration of federal inmates in state, local, and private facilities. The B&F account (i.e., the capital budget) provides funding for the construction of new facilities and the modernization, repair, and expansion of existing facilities.6

    Figure 2. Appropriations for BOP, FY1980-FY2016

    Appropriations in billions of nominal dollars

    Source: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons.

    Notes: Amounts in Figure 2 include all supplemental appropriations and any rescissions of enacted budgetauthority, but they do not include rescissions of unobligated balances. From FY1980 to FY1995, funding for theNational Institute of Corrections (NIC) was included in a separate account. Since FY1996, funding for the NIChas been included in the S&E account. In Figure 2, funding for the NIC for FY1980-FY1995 was added to theS&E account to make funding for the S&E account comparable across fiscal years. The FY2013-enacted amountreflects the amount sequestered per the Budget Control Act of 2011(P.L. 112-25). Two trends emerge from a review of BOP's appropriations from FY1980 through FY2016. First, while there has been a nearly continuous increase in the overall appropriations for BOP, it is in large part driven by an unbroken year-by-year increase in appropriations for BOP's Salaries and Expenses (S&E) account since FY1980 (see Figure 2). The one exception to this trend is the appropriation for FY2013, which is lower than the FY2012 appropriation for the S&E account due to the sequestration ordered pursuant to the Budget Control Act of 2011 (P.L. 112-25). It is not surprising that Congress would appropriate increasing amounts for the S&E account in light of the steadily growing federal prison population. Appropriations for the S&E account pay the salaries and benefits of both correctional officers and other institutional employees. BOP has had to hire more officers and other employees as it opens more prisons and supervises more inmates.

    Second, funding for the Buildings and Facilities (B&F) account is more irregular, with Congress appropriating more in some fiscal years and less in others. There are noticeable peaks and valleys in B&F funding, which are likely the result of the cyclical nature of the expansion of BOP's prison capacity. Congress would appropriate funding to help boost bedspace in the federal prison system; BOP would use that funding to plan and construct new prisons. BOP's capacity would expand to an acceptable point, but it would need to expand again in later years as the prison population grew, and the cycle would begin anew.

    Trends in BOP's Funding by Decision Unit

    Each of BOP's two appropriations accounts are divided into specific decision units, each of which fund more specific BOP operations. Examination of funding for the decision units provides more insight into how BOP allocates its annual appropriation in light of the challenges it has faced as it confined more inmates between FY1980 and FY2016. The S&E account is divided into four decision units:

    • Inmate Care and Programs: This decision unit covers the cost of inmate food, medical supplies, institutional and release clothing, welfare services, transportation, gratuities, staff salaries, and operational costs of functions directly related to providing inmate care. It provides funding for inmate programs, including education and vocational training, psychological services, religious programs, and drug treatment. This decision unit also covers costs associated with regional and central office administration and support related to providing inmate care.
    • Institution Security and Administration: This decision unit funds institution maintenance, motor pool operations, powerhouse operations, institution security, and other administrative functions. It also covers costs associated with regional and central office administrative and management support functions such as research and evaluation, systems support, financial management, budget functions, safety, and legal counsel.
    • Contract Confinement: This decision unit provides for the costs associated with the confinement of federal inmates in contract facilities, which include private prisons, Residential Reentry Centers (RRC), state and local facilities, and home confinement. It provides funding for the management and oversight of contract confinement functions. This decision unit also provides funding for the National Institute of Corrections (NIC).
    • Management and Administration: This decision unit provides funding for costs associated with general administration and provides funding for BOP's central office, regional offices, and staff training centers.

    Since FY1999, approximately 80% of BOP's S&E funding has gone to combined appropriations for the Inmate Care and Programs and the Institution Security and Administration decision units. Funding for these two decision units has increased at about the same rate as funding for the S&E account overall. Between FY1999 and FY2015, funding for the Inmate Care and Programs decision unit increased 137% and funding for the Institution Security and Administration decision unit increased 114%. In comparison, funding for the S&E account increased 136% over the same time period.

    Funding for the Contract Confinement decision unit increased 297% between FY1999 and FY2015. The steeper increase in funding for the Contract Confinement decision unit comes as BOP has relied on confining more inmates in contract facilities, along with growing demand for RRC bedspace (a byproduct of more inmates being released after serving a period of incarceration).

    While funding for the Contract Confinement decision unit outpaced the growth of funding for the S&E account overall, funding for the Management and Administration decision unit grew at a rate below that of the S&E account. Between FY1999 and FY2015, funding for the Management and Administration decision unit increased 49%.

    The B&F account is divided into two decision units:

    • New Construction: This decision unit covers lease payments for the Oklahoma Transfer Center, the salaries and administrative costs of staff involved in new prison construction, construction of inmate work program areas and expansion and conversion projects (i.e., additional special housing unit space).
    • Modernization and Repair: This decision unit provides resources to undertake essential rehabilitation, modernization, and renovation of correctional facilities and their grounds. This includes modifications to facilities to accommodate correctional programs, repair or replace utilities systems and other critical infrastructure, repair projects at existing institutions, and maintain all systems and structures in a good state of repair.

    Since FY1999, a majority of the funding for the B&F account has been dedicated for new prison construction, though the amount dedicated for this purpose has decreased significantly (in FY2001, BOP allocated $710.8 million to new construction; in FY2015, it was $25.0 million). The decrease in the amount dedicated for new prison construction has been a function of BOP slowly scaling back on building new prisons.

    Requested Versus Enacted Funding for BOP A comparison of BOP's annual appropriations for its S&E and B&F accounts to the Administration's request for both accounts shows that Congress has been more likely to fund the Administration's request for prison construction and less likely to fully fund the Administration's request for the upkeep and care of the prison population (see Figure 3). The requested appropriation indicates what BOP believed it would need to properly manage the growing prison population each fiscal year. The data suggest that in many fiscal years BOP operated with a budget below what it felt was adequate given the growing number of inmates under its jurisdiction. The data presented in Figure 3 show that between FY1980 and FY2016, Congress appropriated less than the Administration's request for the B&F account 16 times. Over the same time period Congress appropriated less than the Administration's request for the S&E account 23 times. In contrast to this general trend, however, the amount appropriated for the S&E account between FY2007 and FY2010 actually exceeded the Administration's request. The additional amounts, as noted by the House Committee on Appropriations, were to compensate for underfunding BOP, which resulted in inadequate staffing levels and shortfalls in inmate programs.7 Both the House and the Senate appropriations committees reported that they felt the Administration's requests for BOP were inadequate for several years, which did not allow the bureau to meet its basic operational needs.8 However, appropriations for the S&E account have been below the Administration's request for five of the past six fiscal years, by an average of $242.6 million.

    Figure 3. Difference Between Appropriations and the Administration's Request for BOP's S&E and B&F Accounts

    Amounts in millions of dollars

    Source: Appropriated amounts were provided by the U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons. The Administration's requested amounts were taken from the appendix to the Budget of the United States Government, for FY1980-FY2016.

    Notes: Between FY1980 and FY1995, appropriations for the National Institute of Corrections (NIC) were provided in a separate account. After FY1995, the operating expenses for NIC are paid out of BOP's S&E account. Therefore, to make appropriations for the S&E account as comparable as possible, appropriations for the NIC for FY1980-FY1995 were added to appropriations for the S&E account. Between FY1996 and FY2000, BOP received an amount from the Violent Crime Reduction Trust Fund, which, according to BOP, was used for substance abuse treatment. As such, these amounts were also added to the S&E account.

    Source: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons.

    Notes: Nominal appropriations were adjusted for inflation using the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) Chained Price Index presented in Table 10.1 of the FY2017 Budget of the U.S. Government. Inflation-adjusted amounts are presented in FY2015 dollars.

    Source: BOP's annual appropriations data were provided by the U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons. Annual discretionary budget authority data for the Department of Justice for FY1980-FY2016 were taken from Table 5.4 from the FY2017 Budget of the United States Government.

    Request

    Appropriated

    Fiscal Year

    Salaries and Expenses

    Buildings and Facilities

    Total

    Salaries and Expenses

    Buildings and Facilities

    Total

    1980

    $338,051

    $5,960

    $344,011

    $323,884

    $5,960

    $329,844

    1981

    355,258

    10,466

    365,724

    351,759

    10,020

    361,779

    1982

    377,267

    14,731

    391,998

    378,016

    56,481

    434,497

    1983

    387,587

    6,667

    394,254

    412,133

    66,667

    478,800

    1984

    437,928

    97,142

    66,667

    478,800

    1984

    464,850

    47,711

    512,561

    1985

    497,662

    82,556

    580,218

    86,043

    622,975

    1986

    560,004

    46,063

    606,067

    44,082

    605,562

    1987

    608,302

    159,152

    656,941

    219,249

    876,190

    1988

    771,360

    210,334

    981,694

    297,076

    1,069,089

    1989

    943,530

    436,554

    1,380,084

    612,914

    1,574,930

    1990

    1,162,666

    401,332

    1,563,998

    1,511,953

    2,650,731

    1991

    1,381,889

    374,358

    1,756,247

    374,358

    1,738,003

    1992

    1,748,056

    411,593

    2,159,649

    462,090

    2,111,211

    1993

    1,906,806

    339,225

    2,246,031

    339,225

    2,132,695

    1994

    1,895,214

    276,850

    2,172,064

    269,543

    2,232,148

    1995

    2,417,096

    191,021

    2,608,117

    276,301

    2,596,023

    1996

    2,640,417

    337,228

    2,546,893a

    334,728

    2,881,621

    1997

    2,888,316

    320,924

    3,209,240

    435,200

    3,183,627

    1998

    2,965,642

    278,057

    3,243,699

    255,133

    3,102,910

    1999

    3,032,494

    413,997

    2,888,853d

    410,997

    3,299,850

    2000

    3,191,928

    558,791

    3,111,073e

    556,780

    3,667,853

    2001

    3,545,769

    835,660

    4,381,429

    833,822

    4,303,561

    2002

    3,829,437

    833,273

    4,662,710

    807,808

    4,612,926

    2003

    4,208,459

    396,609

    4,044,788

    396,632

    4,441,420

    2004

    4,677,214

    187,900

    4,414,313

    393,515

    4,807,828

    2005

    4,706,232

    397,700

    5,103,932

    205,076

    4,776,461

    2006

    4,859,649

    170,112

    5,029,761

    99,961

    4,930,121

    2007

    4,987,059

    117,102

    5,012,433

    432,425

    5,444,858

    2008

    5,151,440

    210,003

    5,361,443

    372,720

    5,719,460

    2009

    5,435,754

    95,807

    5,531,561

    575,807

    6,176,599

    2010

    5,979,831

    96,744

    6,106,231

    99,155

    6,205,386

    2011

    6,533,779

    269,733

    6,803,512

    98,957

    6,381,367

    2012

    6,724,266

    99,934

    6,551,281

    90,000

    6,641,281

    2013f

    6,820,217

    99,189

    6,349,248

    95,356

    6,444,604

    2014

    6,769,000

    90,000

    6,859,000

    Source: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons.

    Notes: Amounts in Table 1 include all supplemental appropriations and any rescissions of enacted budget authority, but they do not include rescissions of unobligated balances. From FY1980 to FY1995, funding for the National Institute of Corrections (NIC) was included in a separate account. Since FY1996, funding for the NIC has been included in the S&E account. In Table 1, funding for the NIC for FY1980-FY1995 was added to the S&E account to make funding for the S&E account comparable across fiscal years.

    a. Includes $13.5 million appropriated from the Violent Crime Reduction Trust Fund (VCRTF).

    b. Includes $25.2 million appropriated from the VCRTF.

    c. Includes $26.1 million appropriated from the VCRTF.

    d. Includes $26.5 million appropriated from the VCRTF.

    e. Includes $22.5 million appropriated from the VCRTF.

    f. The FY2013-enacted amount includes the amount sequestered per the Budget Control Act of 2011(P.L. 112-25).

    Source: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons.

    Notes: Amounts in Table A-1include all supplemental appropriations and any rescissions of enacted budget
    authority, but they do not include rescissions of unobligated balances. From FY1980 to FY1995, funding for the
    National Institute of Corrections (NIC) was included in a separate account. Since FY1996, funding for the NIC
    has been included in the S&E account. In Figure 2Table A-1, funding for the NIC for FY1980-FY1995 was added to the
    S&E account to make funding for the S&E account comparable across fiscal years. The FY2013-enacted amount
    includes reflects the amount sequestered per the Budget Control Act of 2011(P.L. 112-25). a. Includes $13.5 million appropriated from the Violent Crime Reduction Trust Fund (VCRTF). b. Includes $25.2 million appropriated from the VCRTF. c. Includes $26.1 million appropriated from the VCRTF. d. Includes $26.5 million appropriated from the VCRTF. e. Includes $22.5 million appropriated from the VCRTF. Table A-2. Appropriations for BOP, by Decision Unit, FY1999-FY2015 the amount sequestered per the Budget Control Act of 2011(P.L. 112-25).

    Figure 2. Appropriations for the BOP, FY1980-FY2014

    Appropriations in billions of nominal dollars

    Source: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons.

    Notes: Amounts in Figure 2 831,150

    105,244

    6,936,394

    6,769,000

    90,000

    6,859,000

    2015

    6,804,000

    90,000

    6,894,000

    6,815,000

    106,000

    6,921,000

    2016

    7,204,158

    140,564

    7,344,722

    6,948,500

    530,000

    7,478,500

    A review of the appropriations presented in Table 1 shows two trends in the BOP's appropriations. First, while there has been a nearly continuous increase in the overall appropriations for the BOP, it is in large part driven by an unbroken year-by-year increase in appropriations for the BOP's Salaries and Expenses (S&E) account since FY1980 (see Figure 2). The one exception to this trend is the appropriation for FY2013, which is lower than the FY2012 appropriation for the S&E account due to the sequestration ordered pursuant to the Budget Control Act of 2011 (P.L. 112-25). It is not surprising that Congress would appropriate increasing amounts for the S&E account in light of the steadily growing federal prison population. Appropriations for the S&E account pay the salaries and benefits of both correctional officers and other institutional employees. The BOP has had to hire more officers and other employees as it opens more prisons and supervises more inmates. In addition, not only has the cost of operating the federal prison system increased because the BOP is responsible for confining more inmates, but the per capita cost of incarceration has also increased over the years. In FY2000, the nominal per capita cost for all inmates was $21,603; by FY2013, the nominal per capita cost of incarceration had increased to $29,291.66 The increasing per capita cost of confinement is largely due to inflationary pressures, such as the increasing cost of health care, food, clothing, and utilities and the cost of hiring additional personnel to properly manage the inmate population.

    Second, funding for the Buildings and Facilities (B&F) account is more irregular, with Congress appropriating more in some fiscal years and less in others. Congress appropriated more funding in fiscal years where the BOP expanded its prison capacity in an effort to relieve overcrowding. Also, there is a lag between when Congress appropriates funding for construction of a new prison and when the prison is operational because the BOP must first plan the prison's construction, acquire the land, and then contract for the construction of the facility. It can take several years after construction begins before a prison is ready to accept inmates. For example, there was a noticeable spike in appropriations for the B&F account in FY1990, followed by three fiscal years of above-average funding for the account.67 Between FY1990 and FY1997, the BOP opened 27 new prisons. There was another increase in funding for the B&F account between FY1999 and FY2004. Appropriations for the B&F account during this time period averaged approximately $567.0 million per fiscal year. Between FY1999 and FY2005, the BOP opened 22 new prisons.

    Each of the BOP's two appropriations accounts are divided into specific decision units, each of which fund more specific BOP operations. An examination of funding for the decision units under the S&E and B&F accounts provides more insight into how the BOP allocates its annual appropriation in light of the challenges it faces as it becomes responsible for confining more inmates. The S&E account is divided into four decision units, which are as follows:

    • Inmate Care and Programs: This decision unit covers the cost of inmate food, medical supplies, institutional and release clothing, welfare services, transportation, gratuities, staff salaries, and operational costs of functions directly related to providing inmate care. It provides funding for inmate programs, including education and vocational training, psychological services, religious programs, and drug treatment. All of the drug treatment programs discussed above are funded from this decision unit. This decision unit also covers costs associated with regional and central office administration and support related to providing inmate care.
    • Institution Security and Administration: This decision unit covers costs associated with the maintenance of facilities and institution security. It funds institution maintenance, motor pool operations, powerhouse operations, institution security, and other administrative functions. This decision unit also covers costs associated with regional and central office administrative and management support functions such as research and evaluation, systems support, financial management, budget functions, safety, and legal counsel.
    • Contract Confinement: This decision unit provides for the costs associated with the confinement of federal inmates in contract facilities, which include private prisons, Residential Reentry Centers, state and local facilities, and home confinement. It provides funding for the management and oversight of contract confinement functions. This decision unit also provides funding for the National Institute of Corrections (NIC).
    • Management and Administration: This decision unit provides funding for costs associated with general administration and provides funding for the central office, regional offices, and staff training centers.

    The B&F account is divided into two decision units:

    • New Construction: This decision unit covers lease payments for the Oklahoma Transfer Center, the salaries and administrative costs of staff involved in new prison construction, construction of inmate work program areas and expansion and conversion projects (i.e., additional special housing unit space).
    • Modernization and Repair: This decision unit provides resources to undertake essential rehabilitation, modernization, and renovation of correctional facilities and their grounds. This includes modifications to facilities to accommodate correctional programs, repair or replace utilities systems and other critical infrastructure, repair projects at existing institutions, and maintain all systems and structures in a good state of repair.

    Table 2. Appropriations for the BOP, by Decision Unit, FY1999-FY2014

    Appropriations in thousands of dollars

    81,000

     

    Salaries and Expenses

    Buildings and Facilities

    Fiscal Year

    Inmate Care and Programs

    Institution Security and Administration

    Contract Confinement

    Management and Administration

    New Construction

    Modernization and Repair

    1999

    $1,090,148

    $1,401,349

    $255,062

    $142,249

    $322,963

    $88,034

    2000

    1,123,856

    1,494,809

    344,773

    147,635

    441,003

    115,777

    2001

    1,208,480

    1,601,518

    511,579

    148,162

    710,816

    123,006

    2002

    1,311,335

    1,722,567

    620,145

    151,071

    675,040

    132,768

    2003

    1,454,481

    1,868,538

    567,365

    154,404

    262,956

    133,676

    2004

    1,624,308

    2,050,417

    574,473

    165,115

    177,620

    164,000

    2005

    1,682,656

    2,094,917

    627,135

    166,677

    25,372

    179,704

    2006

    1,740,011

    2,227,223

    683,031

    179,895

    48,115

    51,846

    2007

    1,774,048

    2,297,055

    757,851

    183,479

    368,875

    63,550

    2008

    1,942,077

    2,409,112

    814,529

    181,022

    302,720

    70,000

    2009

    2,070,002

    2,495,196

    840,933

    194,661

    465,180

    110,627

    2010

    2,215,992

    2,708,651

    981,112

    200,476

    25,386

    73,769

    2011

    2,294,174

    2,783,664

    996,772

    207,800

    25,335

    73,622

    2012

    2,421,272

    2,880,290

    1,040,213

    209,506

    23,035

    66,695

    2013a

    2,424,620

    2,717,938

    1,017,297

    189,393

    23,649

    71,707

    2014

    2,525,039

    2,966,364

    1,074,808

    202,789

    22,852

    67,148

    2015

    2,587,936

    3,002,827

    1,011,505

    211,347

    25,000

    Source: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons.

    Notes: Amounts in Table 2 include all supplemental appropriations and any rescissions of enacted budget authority, but they do not include rescissions of unobligated balances.

    a. The FY2013-enacted amount includesreflects the amount sequestered per the Budget Control Act of 2011(P.L. 112-25).).

    As shown in Table 2, since FY1999 approximately 80% of the BOP's S&E funding has gone to combined appropriations for the Inmate Care and Programs and the Institution Security and Administration decision units. Funding for the Inmate Care and Programs and the Institution Security and Administration decision units have increased at about the same rate as funding for the S&E account overall. Between FY1999 and FY2014, funding for the Inmate Care and Programs decision unit increased 128.6% and funding for the Institution Security and Administration decision unit increased 110.6%. In comparison, funding for the S&E account increased 134.3% over the same time period. Funding for the Contract Confinement decision unit increased 337.0% between FY1999 and FY2014. The steeper increase in funding for the Contract Confinement decision unit comes as the BOP has relied on confining more inmates in contract facilities. For example, in FY1990 about 6,900 inmates under the BOP's jurisdiction were held in contract facilities; by FY2013, approximately 42,400 inmates were placed in contract facilities. Funding from the Contract Confinement decision unit covers the cost of contracts that the BOP signs with RRCs, and since the growing prison population also means that there will be more inmates released from federal prison each year, there has been a growing demand for RRC bedspace. While funding for the Contract Confinement decision unit outpaced the growth of funding for the S&E account overall, funding for the Management and Administration decision unit grew at a rate below that of the S&E account. Between FY1999 and FY2014, funding for the Management and Administration decision unit increased 48.3%.

    The data presented in Table 2 also show that in most fiscal years since FY1999 a majority of the funding for the B&F account has been dedicated for new prison construction, which is probably not surprising given the BOP's need to expand prison capacity to handle an ever growing prison population. The BOP has, and continues to, face problems with prison overcrowding. Between FY1999 and FY2013, the BOP increased its capacity by more than 40,100 beds.68 Even though the BOP has expanded prison capacity, crowding in the federal prison system increased from 31% over rated capacity to 36% over rated capacity between FY1999 and FY2013,69 and even with the planned addition of nearly 7,000 beds by FY2018, the BOP expects prison crowding to increase one percentage point to 41% over rated capacity.70

    As shown in Table 2, in most fiscal years between FY1999 and FY2014, a majority of the appropriation for the B&F account was for new prison construction rather than maintenance of existing facilities. Over this time period, the average appropriation for the New Construction decision unit was $248.3 million while the average appropriation for the Modernization and Repair decision unit was $99.1 million. However, funding for the Modernization and Repair decision unit has exceeded that of the New Construction decision unit in the five most recent fiscal years, but this was not the result of increased funding for modernization and repair projects. Rather, it was the result of Congress appropriating less funding for the B&F account overall. The total appropriation for the B&F account was less than $100.0 million between FY2010 and FY2014, which is approximately 75% less than the average appropriation for the B&F account between FY1999 and FY2009. The lack of funding for maintenance projects could place as much strain on the BOP's future budget as prison overcrowding. The BOP reports that about one-third of its current facilities are over 50 years old.71 Moreover, failure to perform adequate maintenance on existing facilities could result in larger capital investment in future years as prisons and utility systems deteriorate and, according to the BOP, could cause direct and/or indirect security problems.72 It is possible that the demand for maintenance funding would increase in the future as greater demands are placed on an aging infrastructure by prison overcrowding, unless Congress provides funding for a large-scale expansion of new prisons, which could potentially allow the BOP to close some older facilities.

    Congress could choose to mitigate some of the issues related to federal prison population growth by appropriating more funding so the BOP could expand prison capacity to alleviate overcrowding, but this would only continue the upward climb in the BOP's appropriations. There is a concern that the rate of growth in the BOP's appropriations is not sustainable in light of efforts to reduce discretionary spending in order to reduce the federal budget deficit.73

    Congress could also consider ways to reduce the number of inmates held in federal prison through methods such as increasing good time credit for inmates who participate in certain rehabilitative programs, placing more low-level offenders on community supervision in lieu of incarceration, or reducing mandatory minimum penalties for some offenses. Reducing the federal prison population could help bring down the cost of the federal prison system since the BOP would be housing and caring for fewer inmates. A smaller prison population would help alleviate prison crowding and it could improve staff-to-inmate ratios. Shrinking the size of the federal prison population could possibly help the BOP deal with its aging infrastructure, assuming that the prison population decreased enough to allow the BOP to close some of its older facilities. If nothing else, fewer inmates would allow the BOP to shift funding from building prisons to properly maintaining the bureau's current facilities.

    Footnotes

      Federal Correctional Complexesa 30,621

    Source: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons.

    Notes: Per capita costs include support costs. The per capita cost of incarceration for all of BOP includes direct costs for federal detention centers, administrative security facilities, medical referral centers, privately operated institutions, residential reentry centers, and contracts with state and local institutions. It also includes support costs for federal detention centers, administrative security facilities, and medical referral centers.

    a. Federal correctional complexes (FCC) contain two or more facilities with different security levels on the same grounds. For example, FCC Allenwood (PA) contains high-, medium-, and low-security facilities.

    Author Contact Information

    [author name scrubbed], Analyst in Crime Policy ([email address scrubbed], [phone number scrubbed])

    Footnotes

    5. Ibid. See also, U.S. Congress, House Committee on Appropriations, Departments of Transportation and Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2010, Conference Report to Accompany H.R. 3288, 111th Cong., 1st sess., December 8, 2009, H.Rept. 111-366 (Washington: GPO, 2009), p. 671; U.S. Congress, Senate Committee on Appropriations, Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies, Departments of Commerce and Justice, and Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations Bill, 2013, report to accompany S. 2323, 112th Cong., 2nd sess., April 19, 2012, S.Rept. 112-158 (Washington: GPO, 2012), p. 65.
    1.

    E. Ann Carson and Daniela Golinelli, Prisoners in 2012: Trends in Admissions and Releases, 1991-2012, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics, NCJ 243920, Washington, DC, December 2013, p. 39.

    2.

    Based on a CRS analysis of the BOP's annual appropriation for FY1980-FY2014 (see Table 1). Annual appropriations were adjusted using the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U).

    3.

    Data provided by the U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons.

    4.

    U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons, About the Bureau of Prisons, p. 1; hereinafter, About the Bureau of Prisons.

    5.

    18 U.S.C. §4042(a).

    6.

    In some cases, USPs can be designated to house medium security inmates. For example, USP Marion, USP Leavenworth, and USP Atlanta house medium security inmates.

    7.

    U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons, About Our Facilities, Federal Prisons, http://www.bop.gov/about/facilities/federal_prisons.jsp.

    8.

    Ibid.

    9.

    Ibid.

    10.

    Ibid.

    11.

    U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons, Inmate Security Designation and Custody Classification, Program Statement 5100.08, p. 1, http://www.bop.gov/policy/progstat/5100_008.pdf; hereinafter, Security Designation.

    12.

    It is the BOP's policy to try to incarcerate an inmate in a facility that is within 500 miles of the inmate's release residence. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons, Custody & Care, Designations, http://www.bop.gov/inmates/custody_and_care/designations.jsp.

    13.

    Security Designation, pp. 1-2.

    14.

    An inmate's custody level (i.e., community, out, in, or maximum) refers to the level of staff supervision the inmate requires. For example, an inmate with a "community" custody level may be eligible for the least secure housing, including any that is outside the institution's perimeter; may work on outside details with minimal supervision; and may participate in community-based program activities if other eligibility requirements are satisfied. However, an inmate with an "in" custody level is assigned to regular quarters and is eligible for all regular work assignments and activities under a normal level of supervision, but these inmates are not eligible for work details or programs outside the institution's secure perimeter.

    15.

    Security Designation, p. 2.

    16.

    Ibid.

    17.

    Traditionally, each BOP facility is divided into multiple housing units to which inmates are assigned. About the Federal Bureau of Prisons, p. 4.

    18.

    Ibid.

    19.

    Ibid.

    20.

    U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons, FY2014 Performance Budget, Congressional Submission, Salaries and Expenses, p. 20; hereinafter, BOP's FY2014 S&E Budget Justification.

    21.

    Pretrial and holdover (e.g., inmates who are temporarily held in the institution while awaiting transfer to another institution) inmates are not required to complete the Admission and Orientation program. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons, Admission and Orientation Program, Program Statement 5290.14, p. 1, http://www.bop.gov/policy/progstat/5290_014.pdf.

    22.

    Ibid.

    23.

    Ibid.

    24.

    BOP's FY2014 S&E Budget Justification, p. 20.

    25.

    Ibid.

    26.

    Ibid., p. 21.

    27.

    Ibid.

    28.

    Ibid.

    29.

    U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons, Custody & Care, Mental Health, http://www.bop.gov/inmates/custody_and_care/mental_health.jsp.

    30.

    BOP's FY2014 S&E Budget Justification, p. 28.

    31.

    Ibid.

    32.

    Ibid.

    33.

    U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons, Inmate Discipline Program, Program Statement 5270.09, p. 9, http://www.bop.gov/policy/progstat/5270_009.pdf; hereinafter, "Inmate Discipline Program."

    34.

    Each prisoner serving a term of imprisonment of more than one year, but not prisoners serving a life sentence, can receive a good time credit of up to 54 days per year to count toward serving the sentence. The amount of the credit is subject to the determination of BOP. 18 U.S.C. §3624(b).

    35.

    Inmate Discipline Program, pp. 44-54.

    36.

    Inmates sentenced for a federal offense after September 13, 1994, but before April 26, 1996, and who committed a crime of violence (as defined by the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, P.L. 103-322), inmates who were sentenced for a federal offense after April 26, 1996, and inmates who were sentenced for a District of Columbia Code offense after August 5, 2000, all lose some amount of good time credit as a mandatory sanction for committing a prohibited act. Ibid., p. 11.

    37.

    U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons, Special Housing Units, Program Statement 5270.10, http://www.bop.gov/policy/progstat/5270_010.pdf.

    38.

    Facilities with SMUs are USP Allenwood, USP Lewisburg, FCI Talladega, FCC Florence, and FCC Oakdale.

    39.

    U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons, Special Management Units, Program Statement 5217.01, pp. 1-2, http://www.bop.gov/policy/progstat/5217_001.pdf.

    40.

    Ibid., p. 2.

    41.

    Ibid.

    42.

    Ibid., p. 5.

    43.

    Ibid., pp. 7-10.

    44.

    Facilities with CMUs are FCC Terre Haute and USP Marion.

    45.

    U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons, State of the Bureau 2009, p. 37, http://www.bop.gov/resources/pdfs/sob09.pdf.

    46.

    Ibid.

    47.

    Ibid.

    48.

    U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons, Administrative Remedy Program, Program Statement 1330.13, p. 4, http://www.bop.gov/policy/progstat/1330_013.pdf.

    49.

    Ibid.

    50.

    Ibid., p. 7.

    51.

    Ibid.

    52.

    The FPI is a government-owned corporation that employs federal inmates. For more information on the FPI, see CRS Report RL32380, Federal Prison Industries: Overview and Legislative History, by [author name scrubbed].

    53.

    U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons, State of the Bureau 2008, pp. 2-3, http://www.bop.gov/resources/pdfs/sob08.pdf.

    54.

    BOP's FY2014 S&E Budget Submission, pp. 35-36.

    55.

    Ibid.

    56.

    U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons, Custody & Care, Reentry Programs, http://www.bop.gov/inmates/custody_and_care/reentry.jsp.

    57.

    Ibid.

    58.

    Ibid.

    59.

    U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons, About Our Facilities, Reentry Centers, http://www.bop.gov/about/facilities/residential_reentry_management_centers.jsp.

    60.

    Ibid.

    61.

    Ibid.

    62.

    Ibid.

    63.

    Ibid.

    64 Appendix B. BOP Per Capita Costs Table B-1. Per Capita Cost of Incarceration in the Federal Prison System, FY2000-FY2015    

    Security Level

    Fiscal Year

    All of BOP

    High

    Medium

    Low

    Minimum

    2000

    $21,603

    $26,518

    $21,417

    $18,407

    $17,452

    $21,360

    2001

    22,175

    26,135

    21,806

    18,846

    17,788

    20,543

    2002

    22,518

    27,456

    21,473

    19,228

    18,770

    21,538

    2003

    23,180

    26,461

    21,946

    19,480

    18,136

    21,948

    2004

    23,267

    26,951

    21,896

    19,242

    17,647

    21,764

    2005

    23,431

    26,377

    21,718

    19,193

    17,478

    22,458

    2006

    24,439

    25,398

    23,648

    20,834

    17,291

    23,152

    2007

    24,923

    26,109

    23,492

    21,922

    17,812

    22,804

    2008

    25,895

    27,924

    24,065

    23,373

    19,635

    23,958

    2009

    27,251

    32,119

    25,442

    24,087

    20,772

    25,750

    2010

    28,282

    33,858

    26,248

    25,377

    21,005

    27,267

    2011

    28,894

    34,629

    26,852

    26,853

    21,286

    27,516

    2012

    29,027

    34,046

    26,686

    27,166

    21,694

    27,683

    2013

    29,291

    33,887

    27,278

    27,386

    21,960

    28,330

    2014

    35,718

    28,536

    28,425

    23,232

    29,617

    2015

    31,976

    36,690

    29,475

    29,273

    24,149

    31,528

    1.

    E. Ann Carson, Prisoners in 2014, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics, NCJ 248955, Washington, DC, September 2015, p. 3.

    2.

    U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons, About the Bureau of Prisons, p. 1.

    3.

    Data on the federal prison population are provided by BOP at https://www.bop.gov/about/statistics/population_statistics.jsp.

    4.

    U.S. Congress, Senate Committee on Appropriations, Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies, Departments of Commerce and Justice, and Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations Bill, 2013, report to accompany S. 2323, 112th Cong., 2nd sess., April 19, 2012, S.Rept. 112-158 (Washington: GPO, 2012), p. 64.

    The operations of the Federal Prison Industries (FPI) are supported by revenue generated through the sale of prisoner-made goods to federal agencies. In addition, some programs, goods, and services (such as compensation for inmates participating in non-FPI jobs) are paid for by funds generated through the sale of goods to inmates through the prison commissary.

    656.

    In addition to appropriations for the S&E and B&F accounts, Congress usually places a cap on the amount of revenue generated by the FPIFederal Prison Industries that can be used for administrative expenses in the annual Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies appropriations act. Although Congress does not appropriate funding for the administrative expenses of FPI, the administrative expenses cap is scored as enacted budget authority.

    667.

    U.S. Congress, House Committee on Appropriations, Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009, committee print, 111th Cong., 1st sess., March 2009 (Washington: GPO, 2009), p. 274.

    8.

    Data provided by the U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons.

    67.

    Between FY1980 and FY2012, the average appropriation for the B&F account was approximately $299.0 million per fiscal year. This average excludes FY1990 funding for the B&F account because it was an outlier and including it would skew the average upwards (if FY1990 funding for the B&F account is included, the average appropriation for the account was approximately $336.0 million per fiscal year).

    68.

    Data provided by the U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons.

    69.

    Data provided by the U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons.

    70.

    BOP's FY2014 S&E Budget Submission, p. 3.

    71.

    U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons, FY2014 Performance Budget, Congressional Submission, Buildings and Facilities, p. 13.

    72.

    Ibid.

    73.

    In the conference report for the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2012 (i.e., the "minibus," P.L. 112-55), the conferees expressed concern that "the current upward trend in the prison inmate population is unsustainable and, if left unchecked, will eventually engulf the [Department of Justice's] budgetary resources." U.S. Congress, House of Representatives, Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and the Related Agencies Programs for the Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2012, and for Other Purposes, Conference Report to Accompany H.R. 2112, 112th Cong., 1st sess., November 14, 2011, H.Rept. 112-284 (Washington, DC: GPO, 2011), p. 241.