< Back to Current Version

Mexico: Organized Crime and Drug Trafficking Organizations

Changes from April 15, 2013 to July 22, 2015

This page shows textual changes in the document between the two versions indicated in the dates above. Textual matter removed in the later version is indicated with red strikethrough and textual matter added in the later version is indicated with blue.


Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence June S. Beittel Analyst in Latin American Affairs April 15, 2013 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R41576 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence Summary Violence is an inherent feature of the trade in illicit drugs, but the violence generated by Mexico’s drug trafficking organizations (DTOs) in recent years has been unprecedented and remarkably brutal. The tactics—including mass killings, the use of torture and dismemberment, and the phenomena of car bombs—have led some analysts to speculate whether the violence has been transformed into something new, perhaps requiring a different set of policy responses. Most analysts estimate there have been at least 60,000 homicides related to organized crime since 2006. Some analysts see evidence that the number of organized crime-style homicides in Mexico may have reached a plateau in 2012, while other observers maintain there was a decline in the number of killings. It is widely believed that the steep increase in organized crime-related homicides during the six-year administration of Mexican President Felipe Calderón (2006-2012) is likely to trend down far more slowly than it rose. Former President Calderón made an aggressive campaign against the DTOs a key policy of his government, which the DTOs violently resisted. Of the seven most significant DTOs operating during the first five years of the Calderón administration, the government successfully removed key leaders from each of the organizations through arrests or by death in arrest efforts. However, these efforts to eliminate drug kingpins sparked change—consolidation or fragmentation, succession struggles, and new competition—leading to instability among the groups and continuing violence. Between 2006 and 2012, fragments of some of the DTOs formed new criminal organizations, while two DTOs became dominant. These two are now polarized rivals— the Sinaloa DTO in the western part of the country and Los Zetas in the east. They remain the largest drug trafficking organizations in Mexico and both have moved aggressively into Central America. Many DTOs and criminal gangs operating in Mexico have diversified into other illegal activities such as extortion, kidnapping, and oil theft, and now pose a multi-faceted organized criminal challenge to governance in Mexico. Similar to the last Congress, the 113th Congress remains concerned about the security crisis in Mexico. The new government of President Enrique Peña Nieto which took office in December 2012 has proposed a new security strategy that builds on the programs that the Calderón government initiated. These include close U.S.-Mexico security coordination under the Mérida Initiative with police training and judicial reform, and use of the Mexican military to prosecute the campaign against the DTOs in the near term. In his first three months in office, President Peña Nieto has proposed some new approaches—such as establishing a 10,000 strong militarized police force or gendarmarie within a year, revising and expanding crime prevention programs, and refocusing the strategy on lowering violent crime such as homicide and kidnapping. But President Peña Nieto has also tried to shift the national conversation to a more positive message about economic growth rather than remaining focused on organized crime groups and the violence and mayhem that they cause. Congressional Research Service Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence This report provides background on drug trafficking in Mexico: it identifies the major DTOs; examines how the organized crime “landscape” has been altered by fragmentation; and analyzes the context, scope, and scale of the violence. It examines current trends of the violence, analyzes prospects for curbing violence in the future, and compares it with violence in Colombia. For more background, see CRS Report R41349, U.S.-Mexican Security Cooperation: The Mérida Initiative and Beyond; CRS Report R41075, Southwest Border Violence: Issues in Identifying and Measuring Spillover Violence; and CRS Report R42917, Mexico’s New Administration: Priorities and Key Issues in U.S.-Mexican Relations. Congressional Research Service Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence Contents Introduction...................................................................................................................................... 1 Mexico’s Evolving Strategy ...................................................................................................... 3 Congressional Concerns ............................................................................................................ 5 Background on Drug Trafficking in Mexico ................................................................................... 6 Mexico’s Major Drug Trafficking Organizations ............................................................................ 9 DTO Fragmentation, Competition, and Diversification .......................................................... 18 Character and Scope of the Increased Violence ............................................................................. 22 Casualty Estimates for Special Populations ............................................................................ 27 Locations of the Violence and Its Impact on Tourism and Business ....................................... 28 Mexico’s Antidrug Strategy and Reaction ..................................................................................... 33 Public Response....................................................................................................................... 35 Trends and Outlook........................................................................................................................ 37 Figures Figure 1. Map of DTO Areas of Dominant Influence in Mexico by DEA .................................... 14 Figure 2. Organized Crime-Related Killings (2007-2011) ............................................................ 25 Figure 3. Organized Crime-Related Killings in Mexico in 2011 by State ..................................... 26 Tables Table 1. Drug Trafficking Organizations Typology ....................................................................... 21 Appendixes Appendix. Comparing Mexico and Colombia ............................................................................... 44 Contacts Author Contact Information........................................................................................................... 46 Congressional Research Service Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence Introduction Mexico’s brutal drug trafficking-related violence has been dramatically punctuated by more than 1,300 beheadings, public hanging of corpses, killing of innocent bystanders, car bombs, torture, and assassination of numerous journalists and government officials. Beyond the litany of these brazen crimes, the violence has spread deep into Mexico’s interior. Organized crime groups have fragmented and diversified their crime activities, turning to extortion, kidnapping, auto theft, human smuggling, resource theft, and other illicit enterprises. In March 2012, the head of the U.S. Northern Command, General Charles Jacoby, testified to the Senate Armed Services Committee that Mexico had at that time succeeded in capturing or killing 22 out of 37 of the Mexican government’s most wanted drug traffickers. General Jacoby noted that their removal had not had “any appreciable positive effect” in reducing the violence, which continued to climb in 2011.1 With the end of President Calderón’s term in late 2012, several observers maintained that between 47,000 to 65,000 organized crime-related killings had occurred during his tenure depending on the source cited, roughly 10,000 such murders a year. Some analysts, such as those at the TransBorder Institute (TBI) at the University of San Diego have also begun to report total intentional homicides. Drawing on data from Mexican government agencies, the TBI has reported that between 120,000 to 125,000 people were killed (all homicides) during the Calderón administration. Addressing the question if violence leveled off or declined in 2012, TBI estimated that total homicides in Mexico fell in 2012 by 8.5%.2 Because casualty estimates are reported differently by the Mexican government from the media

Mexico: Organized Crime and Drug Trafficking Organizations

July 22, 2015 (R41576)

Summary

Reversing a fairly robust record of capturing and imprisoning leaders of Mexico's drug trafficking organizations (DTOs), the escape of notorious cartel leader Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán on July 11, 2015, was a huge setback for the Mexican government already beleaguered by charges of corruption and low approval ratings. Mexico's efforts to combat drug traffickers have touched all of the major organizations that once dominated the illicit drug trade: for example, the February 2014 capture of Guzmán who leads Sinaloa, Mexico's largest drug franchise; top leaders of Los Zetas in 2013 and March 2015; the October 2014 arrests of Hector Beltrán Leyva of the Beltrán Leyva Organization and, later, of Vicente Carrillo Fuentes of the once-dominant Juárez cartel.

The DTOs have been in constant flux in recent years. By some accounts, in December 2006 there were four dominant DTOs: the Tijuana/Arellano Felix organization (AFO), the Sinaloa cartel, the Juárez/Vicente Carillo Fuentes organization (CFO), and the Gulf cartel. Since then, the more stable large organizations have fractured into many more groups. In recent years, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) identified the following organizations as dominant: Sinaloa, Los Zetas, Tijuana/AFO, Juárez/CFO, Beltrán Leyva, Gulf, and La Familia Michoacana. In some sense, these might be viewed as the "traditional" DTOs. However, many analysts suggest that those 7 seem to have now fragmented to 9 or as many as 20 major organizations.

Several analysts estimate there have been at least 80,000 homicides linked to organized crime since 2006. Few dispute that the annual tally of organized crime-related homicides in Mexico has declined since 2011, although there is disagreement about the rate of decline. It appears that the steep increase in organized crime-related homicides during the six-year administration of Mexican President Felipe Calderón (2006-2012) is likely to trend down far more slowly than it rose. The Mexican government no longer publishes data on organized crime-related homicides. However, the government reported the rate of all homicides in Mexico has declined by 30% since 2012 (roughly 15% in 2013, and another 15% in 2014). Although murder rates have diminished, the incidence of other violent crimes targeting Mexican citizens, such as kidnapping and extortion, has increased through 2013 and stayed elevated. Notably, questions about the accuracy of the government's crime statistics persist.

Former President Calderón made his aggressive campaign against the DTOs a defining policy of his government, which the DTOs violently resisted. Operations to eliminate DTO leaders sparked organizational change that led to significantly greater instability among the groups and continued violence. Since his inauguration in December 2012, Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto has faced an increasingly complex crime situation. The major DTOs have fragmented, and new crime groups have emerged. Meanwhile, the DTOs and other criminal gangs furthered their expansion into other illegal activities, such as extortion, kidnapping, and oil theft, and the organizations now pose a multi-faceted organized criminal challenge to governance in Mexico no less threatening to the rule of law than the challenge that faced Peña Nieto's predecessor. According to the Peña Nieto Administration, 93 of the 122 top criminal targets that their government has identified have been arrested or otherwise "neutralized" (killed in arrest efforts) as of May 2015, although Guzmán's escape confounds that achievement.

Congress remains concerned about security conditions inside Mexico and the illicit drug trade. The Mexican DTOs are the major wholesalers of illegal drugs in the United States and are increasingly gaining control of U.S. retail-level distribution through alliances with U.S. gangs. This report provides background on drug trafficking and organized crime inside Mexico: it identifies the major DTOs, and it examines how the organized crime "landscape" has been significantly altered by fragmentation. For more background, see CRS Report R42917, Mexico: Background and U.S. Relations, CRS Report IF10160, The Rule of Law in Mexico and the Mérida Initiative, and CRS Report R41349, U.S.-Mexican Security Cooperation: The Mérida Initiative and Beyond.

Mexico: Organized Crime and Drug Trafficking Organizations

Introduction

Mexico's brutal drug trafficking-related violence has been dramatically punctuated by beheadings, public hanging of corpses, killing of innocent bystanders, car bombs, torture, and assassination of numerous journalists and government officials. Beyond the litany of these brazen crimes, the violence has spread from the border to Mexico's interior—for example, flaring in the Pacific states of Michoacán and Guerrero. In 2014, new hot spots emerged, including the state of Jalisco, where Mexico's second-largest city, Guadalajara, is located, and the central state of Mexico, while the border state of Tamaulipas stayed violent. Organized crime groups have splintered and diversified their crime activities, turning to extortion, kidnapping, auto theft, human smuggling, resource theft, retail drug sales, and other illicit enterprises. These crimes are often described as more "parasitic" for local populations and more costly.

At the end of President Calderón's term in late 2012, several observers maintained that some 60,000 organized crime-related killings had occurred during his tenure, depending on the source cited. Some analysts, such as those at the Justice in Mexico Project at the University of San Diego, also began to report total intentional homicides in part because the government stopped reporting its estimates of organized crime-related killings. Drawing on data from Mexican government agencies, the Justice in Mexico Project maintained that between 120,000 to 125,000 people were killed (all homicides) during the Calderón Administration, with a gradual decline beginning after 2011.

Addressing the question of whether violence (as measured by the number of intentional homicides) has continued to decline, Justice in Mexico reports that total homicides in Mexico fell by close to 14% in 2014 from the level in 2013, which also had fallen by "approximately 15%" from the prior year, according to data collected by the Mexican National Security System (SNSP).1 The authors praise the apparent decline, but cite the worsening perception of insecurity in Mexico, concern over key cases involving Mexican military and police, and the still elevated rates of violence and crime.

Because casualty estimates are reported differently by the Mexican government from the media outlets that track the violence, there is some debate on exactly how many have perished.2 This report conveys government data, but it has
outlets that track the violence, there is some debate on exactly how many have perished. This report favors government data, but they have not usually been reported promptly or completely. For example, the Calderón government released counts of “tallies of "organized-crime related" homicides through September 2011. The Peña Nieto government has resumed issuing such estimates. The Mexican news organizations, Reforma and Milenio, also keep a tally of “narco-executions.” Reforma reported that in 2012 there were 9,577 organized crime style homicides (an approximate 21% decrease over their tally for 2011), while Milenio reported there were 12,390 for the year (a slight increase over their 2011 tally)briefly resumed issuing such estimates, but did not in 2014. Although precise tallies divergediverged, the trend during President Calderón’ Calderón's tenure was a significantsharp increase in the number of homicides related to organized crime through 2011, and a still high level through 2012. In the first three months of 2013, reportedly homicides related to drug trafficking and organized crime remained stubbornly high at slightly under 1,000 killings per month, indicating little change from the recent monthly tallies under the prior administration.3 1 General Charles Jacoby Jr., Commander of U.S. Northern Command, Senate Armed Services Committee, Hearing on the Proposed Fiscal 2013 Defense Authorization as it Relates to the U.S. Southern and Northern Commands (transcript), March 13, 2012. 2 Cory Molzahn, Octavio Rodriguez Ferreira, and David A. Shirk, Drug Violence in Mexico: Data and Analysis Through 2012, Trans-Border Institute (TBI), February 2013. 3 For tallies in 2013, see “EPN Backed by 50% of Mexicans,” LatinNews Daily Report, April 2, 2013. Most analysts contend that violence levels will not change rapidly, and note that the Peña Nieto government has only been in place a short time. See, Aaron M. Nelsen, “Cartel Violence Continues Unabated Across the Border,” My San Antonio, April 1, 2013 at http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/local_news/article/Cartel-violence-continues-unabated-across-the4401322.php Congressional Research Service 1 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence crime through 2011, when it started a slight decline. Nevertheless, several analysts estimate from 2006 through 2015 that more than 80,000 organized crime-related killings have taken place in Mexico. Violence is an intrinsic feature of the trade in illicit drugs. As in other criminal endeavors, violenceViolence is used by traffickers to settle disputes, and a credible threat of violence maintains employee discipline and a semblance of order with suppliers, creditors, and buyers.43 This type of drug trafficking-related violence has occurred routinely and intermittently in U.S. cities since the early 1980s. The violence now associated with drug trafficking organizations in Mexico is of an entirely different scale. In Mexico, the bloodletting is not only associated with resolving disputes or maintaining discipline, but it ishas been directed toward the government, political candidates, and the news media. Some observers note that the excesses of thissome of Mexico's violence might even be considered exceptional by criminal market standards.5 Following national elections held in both Mexico and the United States in 2012, a new Mexican President, Enrique Peña Nieto, will be coordinating bilaterally to combat organized crime with the second-term Obama administration. Mexico’s new government, which took office in December 2012, has indicated that many of their security programs will build on efforts initiated by President Calderón including collaboration with the United States under the Mérida Initiative, a bilateral and anti-crime assistance package that began in 2008. (For more, see “Mexico’s Evolving Strategy” below). The nearly $2 billion Mérida Initiative, which initially focused on providing Mexico with hardware such as planes, scanners, and other equipment to combat the DTOs, shifted in later years to focus on police and judicial reform efforts, including training at the local and state level. During President Calderón’s six-year term, the brutal violence carried out by the DTOs and other criminal gangs included widely reported attacks on drug rehabilitation centers; attacks on parties of young people; the firebombing of a Monterrey casino in August 2011, killing 52 patrons and employees; and scores of targeted killings of Mexican journalists and media workers. In September 2010, the leading newspaper in Ciudad Juárez, the former epicenter of DTO violence, published an editorial to seek a truce with the DTOs it identified as the “de facto authorities” in the border city when yet another one of their reporters was killed.6 In 2012, TBI’s Justice in Mexico Project reported there were 10 journalists and “media-support” workers killed. The tally killed for the entire period of 2006 – 2012, according to TBI’s Justice in Mexico Project, was 74 journalists and media-support workers. As with many statistics regarding the violence in Mexico, the number of journalists and media workers killed varies depending on which murders the source counts. 7 The imprecision of all the numbers associated with the drug trafficking-related violence in Mexico is further blurred by the grim fact that the DTOs have veered between publicizing their 4 Robert J. MacCoun and Peter Reuter, Drug War Heresies: Learning from Other Times, Vices and Places (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001); Kevin Jack Riley, Snow Job? The War Against International Cocaine Trafficking (New Brunswick: Transactional Publishers, 1996). 5 See, for example, Vanda Felbab-Brown, Peña Nieto’s Piñata: The Promise and Pitfalls of Mexico’s New Security Policy against Organized Crime, The Brookings Institution, February 2013. 6 Following the murder of a second journalist on the staff at El Diario newspaper in Ciudad Juárez, the editor published a plea to the DTOs to consider a truce after asking openly “what do you want of us?” in an editorial September 19, 2010. The Mexican government condemned the idea of a truce, although the editorial was published because the paper said that the authorities could not guarantee the safety of their colleagues. 7 Cory Molzahn, Octavio Rodriguez Ferreira, and David A. Shirk, Drug Violence in Mexico: Data and Analysis Through 2012, Trans-Border Institute (TBI), February 2013. A revised tally is presented in this edition of TBI’s annual report on drug violence. According to the authors, “this tally included journalists and media-support workers employed with a recognized news organization at the time of their deaths, as well as independent, free-lance, and former journalists and media-support workers.” Congressional Research Service 2 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence brutal killings (sometimes by intimidating or manipulating media providers), and covering up the murders they commit. Some shootouts are simply not reported perhaps as a result of media selfcensorship or because the bodies disappear.8 To publicize their handiwork, the DTOs sometimes display corpses in town centers or on roadsides as in Monterrey in May 2012 when 49 bodies were dumped near a major roadway. Sometimes victims are hung from bridges as in Nuevo Laredo in May 2012. Other times bodies are dissolved in acid or, more commonly, disposed of in anonymous mass graves. In 2011, large mass grave sites were uncovered in Tamaulipas and Durango. In late August 2010 in the border state of Tamaulipas, the bodies were found of 72 Central and South American migrants who had been recently massacred. According to a survivor, Los Zetas, possibly Mexico’s most violent DTO, attempted to recruit the migrants to assist in moving drugs and killed them when they refused. (The Zetas are reported to be significantly involved in human smuggling.)9 There is also the fate of those who “disappear” or who have been reported missing. According to a tally reported by the Peña Nieto administration in February 2013, 26,121 Mexicans were reported missing over the course of the Calderón administration. The registry had been compiled under the Calderón government, but was never published. The new government said it will seek to verify all those registered.10 Mexico’s Evolving Strategy After winning the election by a very slim margin and coming to office in December 2006, President Calderón made an aggressive campaign against the DTOs the centerpiece of his administration’s policy. He called the increased drug trafficking violence a threat to the Mexican state and sent thousands of military troops and federal police to combat the DTOs in drug trafficking “hot spots” throughout the country. The federal crackdown on the DTOs led by the well-regarded Mexican military was met with violent resistance from the trafficking organizations. During the Calderón administration, the government had dramatic successes in capturing and arresting drug leaders, with the pace of removing mid- and high-level DTO leaders up sharply from prior administrations. Of the 37 most wanted cartel leaders that Mexico’s government identified in 2009, 25 were either captured or killed during the course of President Calderón’s term in office. However, of the dozen DTO leaders or kingpins captured by the Mexican government, reportedly none were effectively prosecuted in Mexico using police-gathered evidence or witness testimony.11 Nevertheless, in a sign of increasingly close collaboration between Mexico and the United States, between 2007 and 2012 Mexico extradited to the United States a reported 587 suspects wanted on charges in the United States, a majority of them for drug trafficking and related crimes.12 8 Christopher Sherman, “Drug War Death Tolls a Guess Without Bodies,” Associated Press, March 26, 2013. Sofia Miselem, “Migrant Massacre Challenges Mexico Anti-Crime Strategy,” Agence France Presse, August 31, 2010; “Drug Cartel Suspected in 72 Migrants’ Deaths,” NPR: Morning Edition, August 26, 2010; Tim Johnson, “Violent Mexican Drug Gang, Zetas, Taking Control of Migrant Smuggling,” Miami Herald, August, 12, 2011. 10 International Crisis Group, Peña Nieto’s Challenge: Criminal Cartels and Rule of Law in Mexico, Latin America Report, Number 48, March 19, 2013. 11 Nick Miroff and William Booth, “Calderon Leaving his Drug War at a Stalemate,” Washington Post, November 28, 2012. 12 Extraditions had increased under President Vicente Fox, Calderón’s predecessor, whose government extradited 223 (continued...) 9 Congressional Research Service 3 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence Many observers have noted the so-called “kingpin strategy,” of taking down top DTO leaders, which worked to fragment and help destroy the Cali and Medellin organizations in Colombia in the 1990s, has not been replicated as successfully in Mexico. They maintain that the implementation of the kingpin strategy in Mexico has created more instability and, at least in the near term, more violence.13 These analysts maintain that intense but unfocused enforcement efforts against the DTOs increased fragmentation and upset whatever equilibrium the organizations were attempting to establish by their displays of violent power.14 As a result, the violence in Mexico grew more extensive, more volatile, and less predictable. Over the course of the Calderón administration, federal forces went into 12-13 states and large federal deployments became a hallmark of the government’s strategy.15 Communities that were overcome by drug trafficking-related violence, such as Monterrey, Nuevo León, successfully called for troops of the Mexican army and marines to be sent in to protect them. Despite government efforts, however, the militarized strategy was criticized for not reducing the violence, while sharply increasing human rights violations by the military, which was largely untrained in domestic policing.16 Although the degree of change in the security policies of the new Peña Nieto administration from its predecessor’s policies remains unclear,17 some continuity is apparent. Close U.S.-Mexico security coordination under the Mérida Initiative in programs such as police training and judicial reform appears to be continuing and some crime prevention programs focused on youth employment and community development are being expanded. Furthermore, use of the Mexican military to combat the DTOs in the near term is another apparent continuity with the Calderón strategy. At the beginning of his term, President Peña Nieto also announced some new policies— such as establishing a militarized police force or gendarmarie to combat the DTOs and focusing on violent crime reduction rather than taking down kingpins or interdicting drug shipments. Exactly how these programs and others will operate and be implemented remains to be seen. (...continued) people to the United States during his administration. However, that number more than doubled under President Calderón in tandem with closer cooperation structured under the Mérida Initiative. See, Tamara Audi and Nicholas Casey, “A Test of Drug War Teamwork—U.S. Awaits Mexican Response to Request for Extraditions of Major Cartel Suspect,” Wall Street Journal, April 2, 2013. 13 See, for example, Shannon K. O’Neil, “Drug Cartel Fragmentation and Violence,” Council on Foreign Relations Blog, August 9, 2011. 14 Some studies have shown that violence tends to escalate after a government launches a major law enforcement initiative against a DTO or other organized crime group. See, for example, International Centre for Science in Drug Policy, Effect of Drug Law Enforcement on Drug-Related Violence: Evidence from a Scientific Review, 2010. 15 Alejandro Hope, Peace Now? Mexican Security Policy after Felipe Calderón, Inter-American Dialogue, Latin America Working Group, Working Paper, January 2013. According to this analyst, the Calderón government sent federal troops into 12 states. International Crisis Group (ICG), Peña Nieto’s Challenge: Criminal Cartels and Rule of Law in Mexico. The ICG maintains there were more state deployments: “However, Calderón took the offensive to a much higher level, dispatching far more troops to fight cartels in all six border states and more than seven other states in the interior.” 16 See, for example, Human Rights Watch, Neither Rights nor Security: Killings, Torture, and Disappearances in Mexico’s “War on Drugs,” November 2011; Catherine Daly, Kimberly Heinle, and David A. Shirk, Armed with Impunity: Curbing Military Human Rights Abuses in Mexico, Trans-Border Institute, Special Report, July 2012. 17 For more background on the new Peña Nieto government’s security strategy, see CRS Report R42917, Mexico’s New Administration: Priorities and Key Issues in U.S.-Mexican Relations, by Clare Ribando Seelke. Congressional Research Service 4 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence As violence continues at a high level and to reach more of Mexico’s territory, some observers and policy analysts are continuing to raise concerns about the Mexican state’s stability. The Calderón government strongly objected to the so-called “failed state” thesis that was put forward by some analysts in 2008 and 2009, which suggested that the Mexican government was no longer exercising sovereignty in all areas of the country.18 However, in early August 2010, when former President Calderón initiated a series of public meetings to discuss his counterdrug strategy, he described the violence perpetrated by the DTOs as “a challenge to the state, an attempt to replace the state.”19 While some observers consider parts of Mexico lost to DTO control, this is definitely not the case for most of the country.20 In September 2010, then-U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, in remarks to the Council on Foreign Relations, said that the violence by the DTOs in Mexico may be “morphing into or making common cause with what we would call an insurgency.”21 This characterization was quickly rejected by the Mexican government and revised by then-Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs Arturo Valenzuela, the Director of the White House’s Office of National Drug Control Policy Gil Kerlikowske, and later reportedly by President Barack Obama.22 It became clear that the Obama administration generally rejects the term “insurgency” to describe the violence of drug traffickers in Mexico and their objectives. However, many U.S. government officials and policy makers have concerns about the Mexican government’s capacity to lower the violence in Mexico and control insurgent-like or terrorist tactics being employed by the DTOs. Congressional Concerns Mexico’s stability is of critical importance to the United States and the nature and the intensity of the violence has been of particular concern to the U.S. Congress. Mexico shares a nearly 2,000mile border with the United States and has close trade and demographic ties. In addition to U.S. concern about this strategic partner and close neighbor, policy makers have been concerned that the violence in Mexico could “spill over” into U.S. border states (or further inland) despite beefed up security measures. According to the 2011 National Drug Threat Assessment prepared by the 18 The potential for a rapid and sudden decline in Mexico because of the undermining influence of criminal gangs and DTOs was widely debated. See, for example, United States Joint Forces Command, “The Joint Operating Environment 2008: Challenges and Implications for the Future Joint Force,” December 2008. 19 President Calderón’s full statement at the security conference was, “This criminal behavior is what has changed, and become a challenge to the state, an attempt to replace the state.” See Tracy Wilkinson and Ken Ellingwood, “Cartels Thrive Despite Calderón’s Crackdown; Drug Gangs Have Expanded Their Power and Reach in both Mexico and the United States,” Los Angeles Times, August 8, 2010. 20 William Finnegan, “Silver or Lead,” The New Yorker, May 31, 2010. Mexican crime expert, Edgardo Buscaglia, argues that about one-third of Mexican municipalities are controlled by organized crime. See, “Point Person: Our Q & A with Edgardo Buscaglia,” Dallas Morning News, April 9, 2010. 21 “A Conversation with U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton,” Council on Foreign Relations, September 8, 2010. Transcript available at http://www.cfr.org/publication/22896/ conversation_with_us_secretary_of_state_hillary_rodham_clinton.html. 22 Assistant Secretary of State Valenzuela and Director of the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy Kerlikowske made remarks at the annual Conference on the Americas qualifying what Secretary of State Clinton had said earlier in the day, September 8, 2010. President Obama was reported to have negated the comparison of Mexico to Colombia 20 years ago in comments he made to the Spanish language newspaper La Opinion. The White House did not provide a transcript of the President’s remarks which were translated into Spanish by La Opinion. See “Mexico Drug War Not Comparable to Colombia: Obama,” Reuters, September 10, 2010, at http://www.reuters.com/article/ idUSTRE6885TH20100910 Congressional Research Service 5 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence U.S. Department of Justice, the potential harm of Mexico’s criminal groups is formidable. Mexican DTOs and their affiliates “dominate the supply and wholesale distribution of most illicit drugs in the United States” and are present in more than 1,000 U.S. cities.23 During the 111th and 112th Congresses, dozens of hearings were held dealing with the violence in Mexico, U.S. foreign assistance, and border security issues. Congressional concern heightened after the March 2010 killing of three individuals connected to the U.S. consulate in Ciudad Juárez, Mexico, and the murder of Jaime Zapata, a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent, in February 2011, the first murder of a U.S. agent in Mexico in decades. Concern spiked again when two U.S. law enforcement agents and a Mexican Navy captain came under fire by Mexican Federal Police in late August 2012 with both U.S. officials injured in the ambush.24 The 2012 incident raised questions about the training and vetting of Mexico’s Federal Police, a major focus of U.S. support under the Mérida Initiative. Following a July 2010 car bombing allegedly set by a drug trafficking organization in Ciudad Juárez (killing four), additional car bombs have been exploded in border states and elsewhere. Occasional use of car bombs, grenades, and rocket launchers has raised significant concern that some Mexican drug traffickers may be adopting insurgent or terrorist techniques. Congress has expressed its concern over the escalating violence by enacting resolutions and considering legislation.25 Members of the 113th Congress who are following events in Mexico are seeking to learn more about how the new Peña Nieto government will implement policies to address illicit drug trafficking and the heightened related violence in Mexico, and the implications for the United States. Background on Drug Trafficking in Mexico Drug trafficking organizations have operated in Mexico for more than a century. The DTOs can be described as global businesses with forward and backward linkages for managing supply and distribution in many countries. As businesses, they are concerned with bringing their product to market in the most efficient way in order to maximize their profits. The Mexican DTOs are the major wholesalers of illegal drugs in the United States and are increasingly gaining control of U.S. retail level distribution through alliances with U.S. gangs. Their operations, however, are markedly less violent in the United States than in Mexico despite their reported presence in more than 1,000 U.S. cities.26 The DTOs use the tools of bribery and violence, which are complementary. Violence is used to discipline employees, enforce transactions, limit the entry of 23 U.S. Department of Justice, National Drug Intelligence Center, National Drug Threat Assessment: 2011, August 2011, http://www.justice.gov/ndic/pubs44/44849/44849p.pdf, hereinafter referred to as the NDTA. The NDTA 2011 estimated that the Mexican DTOs maintain drug distribution networks in 1,000 U.S. cities. 24 Richard Faussett, “Mexico Under Siege; Mexico May be Losing War on Dirty Cops; President Calderon Vowed to Create a Trustworthy Federal Police. Now Citizens Scoff at the Notion,” Los Angeles Times, August 30, 2012; Randal C Archibold and Karla Zabludovsky, “Mexico Detains 12 Officers in Attack on Americans in Embassy Vehicle,” New York Times, August 28, 2012; Michael Weissenstein and Olga R. Rodriguez, “Mexican Cops Detained in Shooting of US Government Employees that Highlights Police Problems,” Associated Press, August 27, 2012. 25 For more information on congressional action related to violence and terrorism-related concerns in Mexico, see CRS Report RS21049, Latin America: Terrorism Issues, by Mark P. Sullivan and June S. Beittel. 26 The NDTA, 2010, February 2010, states “Direct violence similar to the violence occurring among major DTOs in Mexico is rare in the United States.” For a discussion of why the violence has not spread into the United States, see CRS Report R41075, Southwest Border Violence: Issues in Identifying and Measuring Spillover Violence, by Kristin M. Finklea. Congressional Research Service 6 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence competitors, and coerce. Bribery and corruption help neutralize government action against the DTOs, ensure impunity, and facilitate smooth operations. The proceeds of drug sales (either laundered or as cash smuggled back to Mexico) are used in part to corrupt U.S. and Mexican border officials27 and Mexican law enforcement, security forces, and public officials to either ignore DTO activities or to actively support and protect them. Mexican DTOs advance their operations through widespread corruption; when corruption fails to achieve cooperation and acquiescence, violence is the ready alternative. Police corruption has been so extensive that law enforcement officials corrupted by the DTOs sometimes carry out their violent assignments. Purges of municipal, state, and federal police have not contained the problem. Recent examples of suspected corruption in Mexico’s Federal Police, (which were expanded from a force of 6,500 to 37,000 under the Calderón government and received training under the Mérida Initiative), includes two incidents in 2012. In June 2012 federal police officers shot and killed three of their colleagues at Mexico City’s international airport. Reportedly, the officers had carried out the murders of their fellow officers at the bidding of a DTO. Following the ambush of two U.S. law enforcement officers and a colleague from the Mexican Navy in late August 2012, twelve Mexican Federal Police officers were arrested and charged with attempted murder.28 Arrests of public officials accused of cooperating with the DTOs have not been followed by convictions. For example, in May 2009, federal authorities arrested 10 Mexican mayors and 18 other state and local officials in President Calderón’s home state of Michoacán for alleged ties to drug trafficking organizations. All but one individual were subsequently released because their cases did not hold up in court.29 In 2011, the former mayor of the resort city Cancún, Gregorio “Greg” Sanchez, was released 14 months after his arrest on drug trafficking and money laundering charges when his case collapsed in federal court.30 Similarly, the former mayor of Tijuana, Jorge Hank Rhon, was released less than two weeks after his arrest in June 2011 on weapons and murder charges due to mistakes made in the arrest procedures.31 The corruption has taken place in states and localities governed by each of the three major political parties in Mexico, indicating that no party is immune.32 The relationship of Mexico’s drug traffickers to the government and to one another is now a rapidly evolving picture and any current snapshot (such as the one provided in this report) must be continually adjusted. In the early 20th century, Mexico was a source of marijuana and heroin to 27 For further discussion of corruption of U.S. and Mexican officials charged with securing the border, see CRS Report R41349, U.S.-Mexican Security Cooperation: The Mérida Initiative and Beyond , by Clare Ribando Seelke and Kristin M. Finklea. 28 For a discussion of both incidents see: Peña Nieto’s Challenge: Criminal Cartels and Rule of Law in Mexico. In addition, see Katherine Corcoran and Armando Montano, “Mexico City Airport Shooting Highlights Ongoing Problems with Drug Trafficking, Corruption,” Associated Press, June 26, 2012 and Michael Weissenstein and Olga R. Rodriguez, “Mexican Cops Detained in Shooting of U.S. Government Employees that Highlights Police Problems,” Associated Press, August 27, 2012. 29 David Luhnow, “Questions Over Tape Face Mexico Politician,” Wall Street Journal, October 16, 2010. In the U.S. Department of State’s 2011 International Narcotics Control Strategy Report it identifies the arrest of 38 officials and police in Michoacán in 2009, 37 of whom were released for lack of evidence. 30 Tracy Wilkinson, “Ex-Mayor of Cancun Released as Case Appears to Collapse,” Los Angeles Times, July 21, 2011. 31 Trans-Border Institute (TBI), Justice in Mexico, June 2011 News Report. 32 Luis Astorga and David A. Shirk, Drug Trafficking Organizations and Counter-Drug Strategies in the U.S.-Mexican Context, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars Mexico Institute, Working Paper Series on U.S.-Mexico Security Cooperation, April 2010, p. 11. Congressional Research Service 7 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence the United States, and by the 1940s, Mexican drug smugglers were notorious in the United States.33 The growth and entrenchment of Mexico’s drug trafficking networks occurred during a period of one-party rule in Mexico by the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI), which governed for 71 years.34 During that period, the government was centralized and hierarchical, and, to a large degree, it tolerated and protected some drug production and trafficking in certain regions of the country, even though the PRI government did not generally tolerate crime.35 According to numerous accounts, for many years the Mexican government pursued an overall policy of accommodation. Under this system, arrests and eradication of drug crops took place, but due to the effects of widespread corruption the system was “characterized by a working relationship between Mexican authorities and drug lords” through the 1990s.36 The stability of the system began to fray in the 1990s as Mexican political power decentralized and the push toward democratic pluralism began first at the local level and then nationally with the election of the National Action Party (PAN) candidate Vicente Fox as president in 2000.37 The process of democratization upended the equilibrium that had developed between state actors (such as the Federal Security Directorate that oversaw domestic security from 1947 to 1985) and organized crime. No longer were certain officials able to ensure the impunity of drug traffickers to the same degree and to regulate competition among Mexican DTOs for drug trafficking routes, or plazas. To a large extent, DTO violence directed at the government appears to be an attempt to re-establish impunity while the inter-cartel violence seems to be attempts to re-establish dominance over specific drug trafficking plazas. The intra-DTO violence (or violence inside the organizations) reflects reaction to suspected betrayals and the competition to succeed killed or arrested leaders. Before this political development, an important transition in the role of Mexico in the international drug trade took place during the 1980s and early 1990s. As Colombian DTOs were forcibly broken up, the highly profitable traffic in cocaine to the United States was gradually taken over by Mexican traffickers. The traditional trafficking route used by the Colombians through the Caribbean was shut down by intense enforcement efforts of the U.S. government. As Colombian DTOs lost this route, they increasingly subcontracted the trafficking of cocaine produced in the Andean region to the Mexican DTOs, who they paid in cocaine rather than cash. These already strong organizations gradually took over the cocaine trafficking business, evolving from being mere couriers for the Colombians to being the wholesalers they are today. As Mexico’s drug trafficking organizations rose to dominate the U.S. drug markets in the 1990s, the business became even more lucrative. This “raised the stakes,” which encouraged the use of violence in Mexico to protect and promote market share. The violent struggle between DTOs over strategic routes and warehouses where drugs are consolidated before entering the United States reflects these higher stakes. Today the major Mexican DTOs are polydrug, handling more than one type of drug although they may specialize in the production or trafficking of specific products. Mexico is a major producer 33 Ibid. p. 4. For more on the political history of Mexico, see CRS Report RL32724, Mexico and the 112th Congress, by Clare Ribando Seelke. 35 Astorga and Shirk, Drug Trafficking Organizations and Counter-Drug Strategies, p. 5. 36 Francisco E. Gonzalez, “Mexico’s Drug Wars Get Brutal,” Current History, February 2009. 37 Shannon O'Neil, “The Real War in Mexico: How Democracy Can Defeat the Drug Cartels,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 88, no. 4 (July/August 2009). 34 Congressional Research Service 8 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence and supplier to the U.S. market of heroin, methamphetamine, and marijuana and the principal transit country for cocaine sold in the United States.38 The west coast state of Sinaloa (see map in Figure 1), which has a long coastline and difficult-to-access areas favorable for drug cultivation, is the heartland of Mexico’s drug trade. Marijuana and poppy cultivation has flourished in this state for decades.39 It has been the source of Mexico’s most notorious and successful drug traffickers. According to the U.S State Department’s 2013 International Narcotics Control Strategy Report (INCSR), more than 90% of the cocaine that is seized in the United States has transited the Central America/Mexico corridor. In the United States, the availability of cocaine began to decline in 2009, which some authorities have attributed in part to an increase in law enforcement efforts in both Mexico and the United States. Coca production in Colombia has also declined, and there has been an increasing flow of Colombian cocaine to other regions such as West Africa and Europe. In 2011-2012, Mexico seized less than 2% of the cocaine that is estimated to traverse the country according to the 2013 INCSR. For 2012, the amount seized was roughly three metric tons. Cultivation of opium poppy (from which heroin is derived) and marijuana doubled in Mexico between 2006 and 2011.40 The U.S. government estimates that Mexico provides about 7% of the world’s supply of heroin, with most of its supply going to the United States although domestic consumption of heroin inside Mexico has increased. Production of methamphetamine is also believed to be climbing, as suggested by the high number of meth laboratories that are destroyed each year by Mexican forces. According to the 2013 INCSR, Mexican authorities seized 267 meth laboratories in 2012 up from 227 in 2011.41 Mexico’s Major Drug Trafficking Organizations The DTOs have been in constant flux in recent years.42 By some accounts, when President Calderón came to office in December 2006, there were four dominant DTOs: the Tijuana/Arellano Felix organization (AFO), the Sinaloa cartel, the Juárez/Vicente Carillo Fuentes organization (CFO), and the Gulf cartel. Since then, the more stable organizations that existed in the earlier years of the Calderón administration have fractured into many more groups. For a time, according to the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), seven organizations were dominant. Those included Sinaloa, Los Zetas, Tijuana/AFO, Juárez/CFO, Beltrán Leyva, Gulf, and La Familia Michoacana. 38 U.S. Department of State, 2011 International Narcotics Control Strategy Report (INCSR), March 2011. The region where Sinaloa comes together with the states of Chihuahua and Durango is a drug-growing area sometimes called Mexico’s “Golden Triangle” after the productive area of Southeast Asia by the same name. In this region, a third of the population is estimated to make their living from the illicit drug trade. See Tim Johnson, “For Mexican Cartels, Marijuana is Still Gold,” San Jose Mercury News, September 5, 2010. 40 IHS Jane's, Jane’s Sentinel Security Assessment–Security, Mexico, February 6, 2012. The report notes that one reason the illicit crops have increased in Mexico is that eradication by Mexican military has decreased over recent years because those forces have been deployed to combat organized crime. 41 U.S. Department of State, 2013 International Narcotics Control Strategy Report (INCSR), March 2013. The total amount of methamphetamine seized by Mexico’s authorities in 2012 was 30 metric tons. 42 See Patrick Corcoran, “How Mexico’s Underworld Became Violent,” In Sight Crime: Organized Crime in the Americas, April 2, 2013. The article maintains that “...the activities and organization of the criminal groups operating in the clandestine industry have been in a state of constant flux. That flux, which continues today, lies at the heart of Mexico’s violence.” 39 Congressional Research Service 9 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence However, many analysts suggest that those seven now seem to have fragmented to between 9 and as many as 20 major organizations. Today, two large “national” DTOs—Sinaloa and Los Zetas— appear to be preeminent. But the diversification into other crime, the ephemeral prominence of some new gangs and DTOs, and shifting alliances make it difficult to portray the DTO landscape. For instance in December 2012, Mexico’s new Attorney General, Jesus Murillo Karam, said that Mexico faced challenges from some 60 to 80 crime groups operating in the country whose proliferation he attributed to implementation of the kingpin strategy by the Calderón government.43 Some major reconfigurations of the DTO line up have taken place. The Gulf cartel, based in northeastern Mexico, had a long history of dominance in terms of power and profits with the zenith of its power in the early 2000s. However, the Gulf cartel’s enforcers—Los Zetas, who were organized around Mexican military deserters—split to form a separate DTO and turned against their former employers. The well-established Sinaloa DTO, with roots in western Mexico, has fought brutally for increased control of routes through Chihuahua and Baja California with the goal of becoming the dominant DTO in the country. Sinaloa has a more decentralized structure of loosely linked smaller organizations, which has been susceptible to conflict when units break away. Nevertheless, the decentralized structure has enabled it to be quite adaptable in the highly competitive and unstable environment that now prevails.44 Finally, La Familia Michoacana—a DTO based in the Pacific southwestern state of Michoácan and influential in surrounding states— split apart in early 2011 and has fought a bitter turf battle with its violent offshoot, the Knights Templar, that is expected to continue. From open source research, there is more available information about the seven “traditional” DTOs (and their successors). Current information about the array of new regional and local crime groups is more difficult to assess. The seven organizations and their successors are still operating, both in conflict with one another and at times working in collaboration. A brief sketch of each of these groups, portrayed in Figure 1 (the U.S. DEA map from January 2012), follows: Tijuana/Arellano Felix Organization (AFO). One of the founders of modern Mexican DTOs, Miguel Angel Felix Gallardo, a former police officer from Sinaloa, created a network that included the Arellano Felix family, and numerous other DTO leaders such as Rafael Caro Quintero, Amado Carrillo Fuentes, and current fugitive Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán. The seven “Arellano Felix” brothers and four sisters inherited the drug fiefdom (AFO) from their uncle, Miguel Angel Felix Gallardo, after his arrest in 1989 for the murder of DEA Special Agent Enrique “Kiki” Camarena.45 By the late 1990s and the early 2000s, this DTO, based in Tijuana, was one of the two dominant organizations in Mexico in competition with the more powerful Juárez organization. The AFO structure began to dissolve after several of its leaders were arrested. Of the Arellano Felix 43 Patrick Corcoran, “Mexico Has 80 Drug Cartels: Attorney General,” In Sight Crime: Organized Crime in the Americas, December 20, 2012. 44 Oscar Becerra, “Traffic Report–Battling Mexico’s Sinaloa Cartel,” Jane’s Information Group, May 7, 2010. The author describes the networked structure: “The Sinaloa Cartel is not a strictly vertical and hierarchical structure, but instead is a complex organization containing a number of semi-autonomous groups.” 45 Special Agent Camarena was an undercover DEA agent working in Mexico who was kidnapped, tortured, and killed in 1985. The Felix Gallardo network broke up in the wake of the investigation of its role in the murder. The famous case and ensuing investigation is chronicled on a DEA website honoring Agent Camarena at http://www.justice.gov/ dea/ongoing/red_ribbon/redribbon_history.html. Congressional Research Service 10 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence brothers, in 2002 Ramón was killed and Benjamin was later arrested. In October 2008, Eduardo Arellano, the last of the five brothers involved in the drug business, was apprehended in Tijuana. A bloody battle for control broke out in 2008 when the AFO organization split into two factions. In the vacuum left by the arrests of the AFO’s key players, other DTOs in the region attempted to assert control over the profitable Tijuana/Baja California-San Diego/California border plaza. The AFO suffered another blow when Eduardo Teodoro “El Teo” Garcia Simental, a former AFO lieutenant, aligned himself with the Sinaloa cartel, which led to a surge of violence in Tijuana.46 Since the January 2010 arrest of Garcia Simental, violence in Tijuana has markedly decreased.47 Some observers have claimed the decrease in violence is an important law enforcement success, while others suggest competing DTOs may have come to an agreement on the use of the drug trafficking route.48 Fernando Sanchez Arellano (alias “El Ingeniero”) is a nephew of the founding Arellano Felix brothers. According to several sources, he maintains leadership of the diminished AFO (also known as the Tijuana DTO). STRATFOR reports that he has worked out a deal with the dominant Sinaloa organization to pay a fee for the right to use the lucrative plaza once under the AFO’s control.49 Other analysts suggest the Tijuana leader is purposefully maintaining a low profile to reduce attention from the media and Mexican government while maintaining a steady business moving drugs North into California.50 Sinaloa DTO. This organization retains the Sinaloa core that has descended from the Felix Gallardo network. Headed by the fugitive prison escapee and billionaire Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán, the Sinaloa DTO emerged as an effective leader in moving cocaine from South America to the United States. Early in 2008, a federation dominated by the Sinaloa cartel (which included the Beltrán Leyva organization and the Juárez cartel) broke apart. Sinaloa, still composed of a network of smaller organizations, has grown to be the dominant DTO operating in Mexico today, controlling by one estimate 45% of the drug trade in Mexico.51 In addition to Guzmán, top leadership of the DTO includes Ismael “El Mayo” Zambada García.52 Examining arrest data of 46 This turf battle resulted in more than 400 deaths in the final quarter of 2008. See Viridian Rios and Gabriel Aguilera, “Keys to Reducing Violence in Mexico: Targeted Policing and Civic Engagement,” ReVista, vol. XI, no. 2 (Winter 2012). 47 Sandra Dibble, “Tijuana Violence Slows, Drops from Spotlight,” San Diego Union Tribune, April 26, 2010. Following the January 12, 2010 arrest of Teodoro “El Teo” Garcia Simental, on February 8, 2010 his brother, Manuel, and their chief lieutenant Raydel Lopez Uriarte, were arrested. For more information, see testimony of Anthony P. Placido, Assistant Administrator for Intelligence, Drug Enforcement Administration and Kevin L. Perkins, Assistant Director, Criminal Investigative Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation, before the Senate Caucus on International Narcotics Control, May 5, 2010. 48 Interview with David Shirk, Director of the Trans-Border Institute, University of San Diego, May 13, 2010. For more background on the role of Tijuana authorities in the reduction of violence, see Rios and Aguilera, “Keys to Reducing Violence in Mexico.” 49 STRATFOR, “Mexican Drug Wars Update: Targeting the Most Violent Cartels,” July 21, 2011. 50 Patrick Corcoran, “A Survey of Mexico’s Trafficking Networks,” In Sigh Crimet: Organized Crime in the Americas, June 27, 2011. 51 “Outsmarted by Sinaloa: Why the Biggest Drug Gang Has Been Least Hit,” Economist, January 7, 2010. 52 The son (Jesús Vicente Zambada) and brother (Jesús Zambada García) of Zambada García are in U.S. custody. The son (Jesús Vicente Zambada) of the Sinaloa cartel leader was arrested in March 2009 and extradited to the United States in 2010, and has alleged in U.S. federal court that he was ineligible for narcotics trafficking charges because of immunity he earned by being an informant for the DEA (a claim rejected by a Chicago Federal Judge in April 2012 in advance of his trial that was slated to begin in October 2012). The brother, Jesús Zambada Garcia, who was arrested in Mexico in 2008, was extradited to the United States on April 3, 2012, and faces eight charges of drug trafficking and (continued...) Congressional Research Service 11 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence the Calderón antidrug effort, some analysts believe they detected a pattern of arrests demonstrating favor toward the Sinaloa DTO, whose members were not being arrested at the same rates as competing DTOs. Former President Calderón strongly denied every accusation of favoritism toward Sinaloa.53 The Mexican military’s July 2010 killing of Ignacio Coronel Villarreal (alias “El Nacho”), reportedly the third-highest leader overseeing Sinaloa operations in central Mexico, has given credence to the argument that Sinaloa has taken hits as serious as the others. Sinaloa reportedly has a substantial presence in some 50 countries, including throughout the Americas, Europe, West Africa, and Southeast Asia.54 Often described as the most powerful mafia organization in the Western Hemisphere, Sinaloa is also reported to be the most cohesive. In 2011, it expanded operations into Mexico City, and into Durango, Guerrero, and Michoacán states while continuing its push into territories in both Baja California and Chihuahua once controlled by the Tijuana and Juárez DTOs. A focus on the capture of Sinaloa leader Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán was an increasing priority for both the U.S. government and the Calderón administration in its last months in office. The Sinaloa leader ranked number one on the Mexican authorities’ list of 37 top narco-traffickers (of whom 25 were captured or killed by December 2012). Nevertheless, Mexican security forces continued to have near-misses in capturing Guzmán, such as the attempt in the resort area of Los Cabos in the Baja California peninsula in March 2012. Efforts to tighten the noose around members of his family have also been unsuccessful. In early June 2012, U.S. authorities sanctioned Guzmán’s ex-wife and his son, Jesús Alfredo Guzmán Salazar, under the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act for their material support and involvement with the operations of the Sinaloa DTO. However, in an embarrassing case of mistaken identity, on June 23, 2012, Mexican authorities announced they had arrested El Chapo’s son, a rising leader within the cartel, only to have it later revealed that their captive was not the son but another person entirely. The lawyers for the person being held in custody, Felix Beltrán León, claimed he was innocent and had no ties to the Sinaloa DTO.55 Juárez/Vicente Carrillo Fuentes Organization. This DTO is led by Vicente Carrillo Fuentes, who took over from his brother Amado, founder of the DTO, who died in 1997. Vicente oversaw the operations when the Juárez DTO was part of the Sinaloa federation, from which it split in 2008.56 The Juárez DTO and its enforcement arm, La Línea, have ferociously fought their former Sinaloa ally to maintain their core territory, the Ciudad Juárez corridor abutting El Paso, TX. (...continued) one of involvement in organized crime. Edward Fox, “Mexican Drug Lord Fails to Prove He Was Informant,” In Sight Crime: Organized Crime in the Americas, April 6, 2012; “Top Member of Sinaloa Cartel, “El Rey” Zambada, Extradited to United States,” TBI, Justice in Mexico, April 2012 News Report. 53 Ibid. See also John Burnett and Marisa Peñaloza, “Mexico’s Drug War: A Rigged Fight,” NPR, All Things Considered, May 18, 2010. 54 Geoffrey Ramsey, “Colombian Officials Arrest Money Launderer for ‘Chapo’ Guzman,” In Sight Crime: Organized Crime in the Americas, August 11, 2011. 55 TBI, Justice in Mexico, June 2012 News Report. 56 Some analysts trace the origins of the split to a personal feud between “El Chapo” Guzmán of the Sinaloa DTO and former ally Vicente Carillo Fuentes. In 2004, Guzmán allegedly ordered the killing of Rodolfo Carrillo Fuentes, another of Vicente’s brothers. Guzmán’s son, Edgar, was killed in May 2008 allegedly on orders from Carrillo Fuentes. See Alfredo Corchado, “Juárez Drug Violence Not Likely To Go Away Soon, Authorities Say,” Dallas Morning News, May 17, 2010. Congressional Research Service 12 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence Since 2008, this inter-DTO battle has raged, resulting in thousands of deaths in Ciudad Juárez, making the surrounding Mexican state of Chihuahua the deadliest in the country.57 The Juárez DTO has reportedly been worn down by the conflict and resorted to other lucrative activities to finance its battle, including domestic drug sales in Ciudad Juárez (where rates of abuse are among the highest in Mexico). The Juárez DTO has battled for control of local drug markets with proxy street gangs. Los Aztecas, one of the larger gangs, is fighting for the Juárez organization against two gangs, the Artistas Asesinos and the Mexicales, representing the Sinaloa DTO.58 The degree of decline this organization has suffered is contested. Some analysts believe it is a “spent force,” while others have identified a tenacity to hold on to parts of Ciudad Juárez and other cities in Chihuahua.59 The DTO’s enforcement arm, the La Linea gang, suffered a major loss when leader José Antonio Acosta Hernández (alias “El Diego”) was arrested in late July 2011. He confessed to ordering more than 1,500 murders and was convicted of the March 2010 murder of the three people connected to the U.S. consulate in Juárez. After his extradition to the United States, he was convicted in U.S. federal court on charges of murder and drug trafficking and sentenced to four consecutive life sentences in April 2012. The case represents increasingly close cooperation between Mexican and U.S. authorities on bringing hyper-violent offenders to justice.60 57 Molly Molloy, research librarian at New Mexico State University, keeps a tally of homicides as reported in the Juárez media and the official reports from the Chihuahua Attorney General. She and others have reported more than 3,000 deaths in Ciudad Juárez in 2010, and more than 10,000 deaths in the beleaguered city since January 2008. See Frontera List, at http://groups.google.com/group/frontera-list and more information about the list at http://fronteralist.org/. 58 STRATFOR, “Mexican Drug Cartels: Two Wars and a Look Southward,” December 17, 2009. 59 Patrick Corcoran, “A Survey of Mexico’s Trafficking Networks,” In Sight Crime: Organized Crime in the Americas, June 27, 2011; STRATFOR, “Mexican Drug Wars Update: Targeting the Most Violent Cartels,” July 21, 2011. 60 “Leader of La Linea Sentenced in Texas court for 2010 U.S. Consulate Murders in Ciudad Juárez,” TBI, Justice in Mexico, April 2012 News Report. Congressional Research Service 13 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Rising Violence Figure 1. Map of DTO Areas of Dominant Influence in Mexico by DEA Source: DEA, January 2012 Notes: The DEA uses the term “cartel” in place of DTO. Also, the DTO identified as the Knights Templar in the report text is labeled in the map key by its Spanish name, “Los Caballeros Templarios.” CRS-14 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence Gulf DTO. The Gulf DTO is based in the border city of Matamoros in the northeastern Mexican state of Tamaulipas. It arose in the bootlegging era of the 1920s. In the 1980s, its leader, Juan García Abrego, developed ties to Colombia’s Cali cartel as well as to the Mexican Federal Police. His violent successor, Osiel Cárdenas Guillén, successfully corrupted elite Mexican military forces sent to capture him. Those corrupted military personnel became known as Los Zetas and fused with the Gulf cartel. At the beginning of the 21st century, Gulf was considered one of the most powerful Mexican DTOs. Cárdenas was arrested by Mexican authorities in 2003, but he successfully ran his drug enterprise from prison.61 The violent struggle to succeed him did not begin until his extradition to the United States in early 2007. (In February 2010, Cárdenas was sentenced to serve 25 years in a U.S. prison.) Despite a difficult internal succession battle and successful law enforcement operations against it, the Gulf organization continues to successfully move drugs. On November 5, 2010, Osiel’s brother, Antonio Ezequiél Cárdenas Guillén (alias Tony Tormenta), was killed in Matamoros in a gun battle with Mexican marines. He had risen to a top position in the Gulf DTO following his brother’s extradition. His death set off renewed violence as the weakened Gulf DTO attempted to fight off the continued assault by its former allies, Los Zetas.62 In 2011, Gulf continued its battle with the Zetas for control over its former strongholds in Tamaulipas, Nuevo León, and Veracruz.63 Although identified by some observers as a “national” cartel, its area of influence has become quite diminished (see Figure 1). In September 2012, Gulf leader Eduardo Costilla (alias “El Coss”) was arrested in Tampico, Tamaulipas. Factions of the Gulf DTO have fought to take over the entire organization to re-unify its disparate “clans” under a single leadership.64 Los Zetas. This group was originally composed of former elite airborne special force members of the Mexican Army who defected to the Gulf cartel and became their hired assassins.65 In 2008, Los Zetas began to contract their services to other DTOs operating throughout the country, notably the Beltrán Leyva organization and the Juárez DTO.66 Los Zetas split with the Gulf cartel in the period of late 2008 to 2010 (analysts disagree on the exact timing) to become an independent DTO. Since February 2010, Los Zetas and the Gulf cartel have been battling in Tamaulipas, Nuevo León, and other Gulf territory for control of drug smuggling corridors. What is especially significant is that in order to fight Los Zetas, the Gulf cartel has allied itself with two former enemies—La Familia Michoacana (LFM) and the Sinaloa cartel—creating an environment of urban warfare with commando-style raids on state prisons, abduction of journalists, murder of police, and attacks on military posts. They have organized elaborate road 61 George W. Grayson, Mexico: Narco-Violence and a Failed State? (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 2010), pp. 72-73. 62 Nacha Cattan, “Killing of Top Mexico Drug Lord ‘Tony Tormenta’ May Boost Rival Zetas Cartel,” Christian Science Monitor, November 8, 2010. 63 Patrick Corcoran, “A Survey of Mexico’s Trafficking Networks,” In Sight Crime: Organized Crime in the Americas, June 27, 2011. 64 For more on the recent evolution of the Gulf DTO, see STRATFOR, “Mexican Cartels: The Gulf Cartel,” April 2, 2013; “Gulf Cartel,” In Sight Crime: Organized Crime in the Americas, at http://www.insightcrime.org/groupsmexico/gulf-cartel 65 Most reports indicate that Los Zetas were created by a group of 30 lieutenants and sub-lieutenants who deserted from the Mexican military’s Special Mobile Force Group (Grupos Aeromóviles de Fuerzas Especiales, GAFES) to join the Gulf Cartel in the late 1990s. See CRS Report RL34215, Mexico’s Drug Cartels, by Colleen W. Cook. 66 Scott Stewart and Alex Posey, “Mexico: The War with the Cartels in 2009,” STRATFOR, December 9, 2009; DEA maintains the split between Los Zetas and the Gulf DTO began in March 2008 at the same time there was growing evidence that Los Zetas had aligned themselves with the BLO. CRS consultation with the Drug Enforcement Administration, December 20, 2010. Congressional Research Service 15 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence blockades during their violent operations to prevent legitimate police from responding.67 In 2010, the battle for territory between the Zetas and the Gulf-Sinaloa-La Familia alliance (a temporary alliance of convenience) increased casualties among the government’s security forces.68 Some observers argue that this killing does not suggest a tactic by the DTOs to target government officials, but rather an increase in inter-cartel rivalry.69 Los Zetas gained power under the leadership of Heriberto Lazcano Lazcano.70 The Zetas have expanded their operations to Central America to collaborate with their Guatemalan equivalent, Los Kaibiles, and with Central American gangs in an effort to take control of cocaine shipments from Guatemala to Mexico.71 In 2011, Los Zetas appeared to have the largest area of geographic influence in Mexico and to be growing stronger in Guatemala. However, the Zetas were targeted by both the Mexican and U.S. governments for increased enforcement in 2011 and 2012, and a number of important Zeta operatives were captured or killed. In October 2012, Mexican marines shot and killed Zeta leader Lazcano in the northern state of Coahuila, although his body was quickly stolen from a local funeral home. This blow to the organization was preceded by rumors of growing friction between Lazcano and another powerful Zeta, Miguel Angel Treviño Morales (also known as Z-40). Treviño reportedly leads the organization now although he may not command the loyalty of all Zeta cells.72 The Zetas are also believed to have achieved the most diversification into other criminal activities. (See section “DTO Fragmentation, Competition, and Diversification.”) While they have been aggressively expansionist, some analysts have questioned if this DTO is responsible for the largest portion of the violent conflict in Mexico.73 Beltrán Leyva Organization (BLO). Until 2008, this syndicate was a part of the Sinaloa federation and controlled access to the U.S. border in Sonora state. The January 2008 arrest of Alfredo Beltrán Leyva, brother of the syndicate’s leader, Arturo, and a leading lieutenant in the organization, is believed to have been abetted by “El Chapo” Guzmán, the top leader of the Sinaloa DTO. The loss of Alfredo assured the animosity between the two organizations. Despite resistance from the Sinaloa federation, the BLO successfully secured drug transport routes in the states of Sinaloa, Durango, Sonora, Jalisco, Michoacán, Guerrero, and Morelos. In addition, the BLO, like other dominant Mexican DTOs, is believed to have infiltrated the upper levels of the Mexican government to help maintain its strong presence and control.74 The BLO has executed 67 William Booth, “Drug War Violence Appears in Mexico’s Northeast, Near Texas Border,” Washington Post, April 21, 2010. 68 “The War Is Mainly Between the Drug Cartels,” Latin American Security and Strategic Review, April 2010. 69 Ibid. 70 According to one account, Los Zetas are active throughout the Gulf Coast with centers of operation in Veracruz, the southern states of Tabasco, Yucatán, Quintana Roo, and Chiapas, and in the Pacific Coast states of Guerrero and Oaxaca, as well as Aguascalientes and Zacatecas. They are also gaining dominance in Mexico State and Hidalgo, which they are using to gain entree to Mexico City. See chapter “Emerging and New Narco Sects—Los Zetas and La Familia,” in George W. Grayson, Mexico: Narco-Violence and a Failed State? (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 2010.) 71 Steven S. Dudley, “Drug Trafficking Organizations in Central America: Transportistas, Mexican Cartels and Maras,” in Shared Responsibility: U.S.-Mexico Options for Confronting Organized Crime, ed. Eric L. Olson, David A. Shirk, and Andrew Selee (Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars and the University of San Diego, 2010). 72 For analysis of the possible restructuring of Los Zetas following Lazcano’s death, see Samuel Logan, “The Zetas After Lazcano: Branded Barbarism,” In Sight Crime: Organized Crime in the Americas, October 30, 2012. 73 See, Geoffrey Ramsey, “Have the Zetas Replaced Sinaloa as Mexico’s Most Powerful Cartel?,” In Sight Crime: Organized Crime in the Americas, January 3, 2012. 74 James C. McKinley, Jr. “Keeping Resident Close, and Maybe a Cartel Closer, Mexican Mayor’s First Months in (continued...) Congressional Research Service 16 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence uncooperative officials, and is believed to be responsible for the May 2008 assassination of acting federal police director Edgar Millan Gomez.75 The organization has shown a high level of sophistication in its operations, forming a strategic alliance with Los Zetas to fight for important drug territory against the Gulf, Sinaloa, and La Familia DTOs. The BLO had long-standing links to Colombian sources, and control over multiple and varied routes into Mexico. Along with the Sinaloa DTO, it had also enjoyed a significant presence in southern Mexico. The organization suffered a series of setbacks at the hands of the Mexican security forces beginning with the December 2009 killing of Arturo Beltrán Leyva during a raid conducted by Mexican marines, and the arrest of Carlos Beltrán Leyva in January 2010. Some experts believe that the remaining Beltrán Leyva brother, Hector, is the acting head of the organization now that the three others have been arrested or killed. Gerardo Alvarez-Vazquez, who was arrested in April 2010, had been fighting Hector Beltrán Leyva for control of the DTO along with Edgar Valdez Villarreal (alias “La Barbie”), who was arrested in August 2010.76 Valdez’s arrest was a major victory for the Mexican authorities and for then President Calderón’s drug strategy.77 He reportedly was one of the rare Mexican-Americans who was a top leader of a Mexican DTO.78 The power vacuum left by the death of Arturo Beltrán Leyva had led to major fighting among members of the BLO and contributed significantly to violence in the central region of the country such as the state of Morelos in early and mid-2010.79 Following the killing of Arturo Beltrán Leyva, two new organizations have emerged: the South Pacific Cartel, reportedly led by Arturo’s brother Hector, and the Independent Cartel of Acapulco, which contains remnants of the old BLO that were loyal to Valdez (“La Barbie”). The capture of Valdez (who had a $2 million reward for his arrest in both the United States and Mexico) may decrease the BLO’s importance, continue the internal power struggle, or tempt other DTOs to take control of the BLO routes. La Familia Michoacana (LFM)/Knights Templar. This DTO, first known as LFM, acquired notoriety for its hyper-violent crimes in 2006, although it traces its roots back to the 1980s. Ironically, it started as a vigilante group to eradicate drug use in Mexico and particularly in Michoacán, where it is based. But as a DTO it has specialized in methamphetamine production and smuggling (reportedly for sale in the United States only) and is also a vigorous trafficker of marijuana, cocaine, and heroin.80 LFM was known for its use of extreme, symbolic violence and a (...continued) Office Marked by Scandal, Twists,” Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, April 25, 2010. 75 STRATFOR, “Mexico: The Cartel Turf War Intensifies,” May 9, 2008. 76 Ivan Moreno, “Mexico City Area Shootout Leads to Arrest of Major Alleged Drug Trafficker,” Associated Press, April 23, 2010. 77 The Mexican government’s strategy to remove high-value targets or kingpins has been especially productive since the end of 2009 when Arturo Beltrán Leyva was killed. That event was followed in 2010 by the arrest or attempted arrest and killing of several other key leaders or top lieutenants vying for leadership such as Edgar Valdez. At the close of 2010, the pace of the strategy to take out top leaders seemed to be increasing. 78 Edgar Valdez is an American-born drug smuggler from Laredo, Texas and allegedly started his career in the United States dealing marijuana. His nickname is “La Barbie” because of his fair hair and eyes. Nicholas Casey and Jose de Cordoba, “Alleged Drug Kingpin Is Arrested in Mexico,” Wall Street Journal, August 31, 2010. 79 “15 Suspected Drug Cartel Enforcers Captured in Mexico,” EFE News Service, April 24, 2010; Trans-Border Institute, Justice in Mexico, February and March 2010 News Reports. 80 Finnegan, “Silver or Lead.” With regard to heroin, LFM has allowed independent traffickers to cultivate opium poppies and to produce heroin for a “tax” in Michoacán, according to a source at the U.S. Embassy in Mexico City. Congressional Research Service 17 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence pseudo-ideological or religious justification for its existence. According to one study, the LFM represented “a hybrid fusion of criminal drug enterprise entity and Christian evangelical beliefs” combining social, criminal, and religious elements in one movement.81 LFM was known for leaving signs (“narcomantas”) on corpses and at crime scenes, and describing their actions as “divine justice.”82 LFM members have reportedly made donations of food, medical care, and schools to benefit the poor in order to project a “Robin Hood” image.83 Once affiliated with Los Zetas (when the Gulf and Zetas DTOs were merged), the LFM turned to oppose Los Zetas. Declared Mexico’s most violent DTO in 2009 by Mexico’s then-attorney general, LFM used some of the ruthless techniques learned from the paramilitary Zetas.84 In 2010, however, LFM played a less prominent role, and in November 2010, the LFM reportedly called for a truce with the Mexican government and announced it would disband.85 In a December 10, 2010, gun battle with the Mexican Federal Police, the LFM’s spiritual leader Nazario Moreno González (alias “El Más Loco”) was killed, according to Mexican authorities.86 In June 2011, LFM leader José de Jesús Méndez Vargas was arrested. A new organization that emerged in early 2011 calling itself the Knights Templar claims to be a successor or offshoot of LFM, and is led by charismatic former lieutenant, Servando Gomez (alias “La Tuta”). The Knights Templar may replace the older organization with which it is now locked in competition. Like LFM, it claims to have a code of conduct and has published a 22-page booklet laying out its ethics.87 The Knights Templar has emulated LFM’s supposed commitment to “social justice” and reportedly LFM’s penchant for diversification into crime such as extortion. According to some analysts, the Knights Templar engaged in combat with the remnants of the LFM throughout 2011, including clashes in the states of Michoacán, Mexico, Morelos, and Guerrero, and have been used as a proxy by the Sinaloa DTO in its battles with Los Zetas and affiliated gangs.88 DTO Fragmentation, Competition, and Diversification As stated earlier, the DTOs today are more fragmented, more violent, and more competitive than the larger and more stable organizations that President Calderón faced at the beginning of his administration.89 Analysts disagree about the extent of this fragmentation and its importance, and whether the group of smaller organizations will be easier to dismantle. There is more agreement 81 Robert J. Bunker and John P. Sullivan, “Cartel Evolution Revisited: Third Phase Cartel Potentials and Alternative Futures in Mexico,” Small Wars & Insurgencies, vol. 21, no. 1 (March 2010), p. 45. 82 Finnegan, “Silver or Lead.” 83 Samuel Logan and John P. Sullivan, Mexico’s Divine Justice, ISN Security Watch, August 17, 2009. 84 Sidney Weintraub and Duncan Wood, Cooperative Mexican-U.S. Antinarcotics Efforts, Center for Strategic and International Studies, November 2010. 85 STRATFOR, “Mexican Drug Wars: Bloodiest Year to Date,” December 20, 2010. 86 Ibid. 87 “Patterned After the Knights Templar, Drug Cartel Issues ‘Code of Conduct,’” Fox News Latino, July 20, 2011. 88 STRATFOR, “Mexican Drug War Update: Indistinct Battle Lines,” April 16, 2012. 89 Patrick Corcoran, “A Survey of Mexico’s Trafficking Networks,” In Sight Crime: Organized Crime in the Americas, June 27, 2011. Congressional Research Service 18 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence that the environment is growing more violent and that the “violent free for all” is a relatively new development in Mexico.90 Fragmentation that began in 2010 and accelerated in 2011 has redefined the “battlefield” and brought new actors, such as Los Zetas and the Knights Templar, to the fore. An array of smaller organizations are now active, including the Resistance and the Jalisco Cartel-New Generation, who have reportedly competed for territory in the coastal states of Nayarit, Colima, and Jalisco.91 Recently some analysts have identified Jalisco Cartel-New Generation as a “major” cartel. Although this group split off from a wing of the Sinaloa DTO (it had been loyal to “El Nacho” Coronel who was killed by Mexican authorities in July 2010), Jalisco Cartel-New Generation now opposes some former allies of Sinaloa such as the Knights Templar as well as fighting against its enemy, Los Zetas.92 Contrary to the experience in Colombia with the sequential dismantling of the enormous Medellin and Cali cartels,93 fragmentation in Mexico has been associated with escalating violence.94 A “kingpin strategy” implemented by the Mexican government has “taken down” numerous topand mid-level leaders in all the major DTOs, either through arrests or deaths in operations to detain them. However, this strategy with political decentralization has contributed to violent succession struggles, shifting alliances among the DTOs, a proliferation of new gangs and small DTOs, and the replacement of existing leaders and criminal groups by ones who are even more violent.95 Analysts disagree about the extent of this fragmentation and its importance. Several analysts have observed that as the Mexican DTOs have fragmented and multiplied, violence has escalated to an all-time high.96 Others analysts caution not to overstate the level of fragmentation. Many of these organizations and smaller gangs are new and it is premature to predict how they will fare or whether the resulting highly competitive group of smaller organizations will be easier to dismantle. The Calderón government, on the other hand, asserted that the removal of DTO leadership through government enforcement operations has not caused violence to spike.97 90 Patrick Corcoran, “Mexico: Upstart Gangs Eat into Cartel Hegemony,” In Sight Crime: Organized Crime in the Americas, August 4, 2011. 91 Patrick Corcoran, “Mexico: Upstart Gangs Eat into Cartel Hegemony,” In Sight Crime: Organized Crime in the Americas, August 4, 2011. 92 See, Peña Nieto’s Challenge: Criminal Cartels and Rule of Law in Mexico, especially Appendix D: Main Cartels in Mexico. See also, STRATFOR, “Mexico Security Memo: The Death of a Cartel de Jalisco Nueva Generacion Ally,” February 27, 2013; STRATFOR, “Mexican Cartels: Cartel de Jalisco Nueva Generacion,” April 4, 2013; Patrick Corcoran, “Jalisco Cartel Promises Mexico Govt It Will Take Down Rival Gang,” In Sight Crime: Organized Crime in the Americas, March 23, 2013. 93 In Colombia’s case, successfully targeting the huge and wealthy Medellín and Cali cartels and dismantling them meant that a number of smaller drug trafficking organizations replaced them (“cartelitos”). The smaller organizations have not been as violent and thus the government was seen to have reduced violence in the drug trade. Critical, however, were factors in Colombia that were not present in Mexico, such as the presence of guerilla insurgents and paramilitaries who became deeply involved in the illegal drug business. Some have argued that the Colombian cartels of the 1980s and 1990s were structured and managed very differently than their contemporary counterparts in Mexico. (See Appendix). 94 O’Neil, “Drug Fragmentation and Violence.” 95 STRATFOR, “Mexico’s Drug Wars: Bloodiest Year to Date,” December 20, 2010; STRATFOR, “Mexican Drug Wars Update: Targeting the Most Violent Cartels,” July 21, 2011. 96 O’Neil, “Drug Cartel Fragmentation and Violence;” Eduardo Guerrero Guitiérez, “La Raiz de La Violencia,” Nexos en Línea, June 1, 2011. Guerrero also argues that eliminating leaders has dispersed the violence. 97 See Alejandro Poiré and Maria Teresa Martinez, “La Caida de los Capos No Muliplica la Violencia: El Caso de Nacho Coronel,” Nexos en Linea, May 1, 2011. (Alejandro Poiré and Maria Teresa Martinez were officials from the (continued...) Congressional Research Service 19 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence Another emerging factor has been the criminal diversification of the DTOs. In addition to selling illegal drugs, they have branched into other profitable crimes such as kidnapping, assassination for hire, auto theft, controlling prostitution, extortion, money-laundering, software piracy, resource theft, and human smuggling. The surge in violence due to inter- and intra-cartel conflict over lucrative drug smuggling routes has been accompanied by an increase in kidnapping for ransom and other crimes. According to recent estimates, kidnappings in Mexico have increased by 188% since 2007, armed robbery by 47%, and extortion by 101%.98 Some believe diversification may be evidence of organizational vitality and growth. Others contend that diversification signals that U.S. and Mexican drug enforcement measures are cutting into profits from drug trafficking, or constitutes a response to shifting U.S. drug consumption patterns.99 The growing public condemnation of the DTOs may also be stimulated by their diversification into street crime, which causes more harm to average Mexican civilians than intra- and inter-DTO violence related to conflicts over drug trafficking. Because the DTOs have diversified, many analysts now refer to them as transnational criminal organizations (TCOs), as organized crime groups, or as mafias.100 Others maintain that much of their non-drug criminal activity is in service of the central drug trafficking business.101 Whatever the label, no one has an accurate way to assess how much of the DTOs’ income is earned from their non-drug activities. Los Zetas are one of the most diversified DTOs. Their satellite businesses include the theft of petroleum from the state-owned oil company PEMEX, product piracy, and human smuggling, as well as extortion, money laundering, and robbery.102 In July 2011, the Obama Administration released a Strategy to Combat Transnational Organized Crime, citing the Mexican DTOs as some of its target subjects.103 On July 25, the White House issued an executive order that named four groups around the world that presented transnational organized crime threats to U.S. national security. Not surprisingly, Los Zetas were identified for their diverse criminal activities and their propensity to commit mass murder. Some analysts have questioned why Los Zetas were singled out, when Sinaloa and other Mexican DTOs are also known to be significantly involved in other forms of crime.104 (...continued) National Public Security Council at the time the article was written. Poiré was subsequently appointed Mexico’s Minister of Interior in November 2011). 98 Mária de la Luz González, “Delitos Aumentan en el País, Alertan,” El Universal, August 23, 2011. This article cites data from México Evalua that is available in Spanish at http://www.mexicoevalua.org/. 99 Morris Panner, “Latin American Organized Crime’s New Business Model,” ReVista, vol. XI, no. 2 (Winter 2012). The author comments: “... the business is moving away from monolithic cartels toward a series of mercury-like minicartels. Whether diversification is a growth strategy or a survival strategy in the face of shifting narcotics consumption patterns, it is clear that organized crime is pursuing a larger, more extensive agenda.” 100 See for example, Eric L. Olson and Miguel R. Salazar, A Profile of Mexico’s Major Organized Crime Groups, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, February 17, 2011. 101 Often kidnapping and extortion are a mechanism to collect payment for drug deliveries, for example. Weapons trafficking and money laundering are obviously closely tied to drug trafficking. DEA officials suggested in an interview that about 80% of the DTOs income may come from drugs, and they continue to use “DTO” or “cartel” to identify the organizations. CRS interview with DEA officials on August 5, 2011. 102 William Booth, “Drug War Violence Appears in Mexico’s Northeast, Near Texas Border,” Washington Post, April 21, 2010; Ioan Grillo, “Special Report: Mexico’s Zetas Rewrite Drug War in Blood,” Reuters, May 23, 2012. 103 President of the United States, Strategy to Combat Transnational Organized Crime, July 19, 2011 at http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/Strategy_to_Combat_Transnational_Organized_Crime_July_2011.pdf. 104 Tim Johnson, “Do U.S., Mexican Officials Favor One Cartel Over Another?,” Miami Herald, August 24, 2011. Congressional Research Service 20 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence The current crime organization landscape is exceptionally fluid, yet several analysts are attempting to define it. For example, in Southern Pulse’s publication Beyond 2012, Sam Logan and James Bosworth describe the increasing multiplication of groups: The tendency for criminal groups in Mexico is toward small and local ... as the number of well-armed criminal groups jumps from the six significant groups we counted in 2006 ... to over 10 in 2012 with a steady growth of new groups to bring the total to possibly over 20 by the end of 2014.105 Analyst Eric Olson of the Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars believes the DTOs are more accurately described as “organized crime groups” and notes that these groups are extremely local in character while engaged in diverse criminal activity. (Many of the actors have diversified beyond the transnational drug trade, as noted above.) Mexican political scientist Eduardo Guerrero-Gutiérrez also describes fragmentation and has provided a very useful typology of different DTOs (see Table 1). He defines four types: National Cartels, Toll-taker Cartels, Regional Cartels, and Local Mafias. Guerrero identifies as many as 64 organizations across the country in the final category. Some of these groups do not participate in drug trafficking-related violence, but are only engaged in what he terms “mafia-ridden” violence. Guerrero attributes the proliferation of new criminal groups to a “non-selective arrest policy” by the Calderón government that has taken out kingpins and leaders and produced violent competition to replace those who have been arrested or killed.106 Table 1. Drug Trafficking Organizations Typology CATEGORY DESCRIPTION ORGANIZATIONS National Cartels Cartels control or maintain presence along routes of several drugs. They also operate important international routes to and from Mexico. These DTOs keep control of drug points of entry and exit in the country. However, they are interested in expanding their control of new points of exit along the northern border, and this is why they currently sustain disputes with other cartels to control these border localities. These DTOs are present in broad areas of the country and have sought to build upon the profits they receive from drug trafficking through diversifying their illegal activities towards human smuggling and oil and fuel theft. Sinaloa, Los Zetas, and Gulf cartels (although Gulf has a significantly less important role than the other two). “Toll Collector” Cartels These are the cartels whose main income comes from toll fees received from the cartels and regional cartels that send drug shipments through their controlled municipalities along the northern border. Given that these cartels are largely confined to some border municipalities, they cannot diversify their illegal activities as actively as the national cartels. If these cartels eventually lose control of their respective border areas they will either intensify their diversification efforts to other business (such as extortion or kidnapping) or they will disappear. Tijuana and Juárez cartels 105 Samuel Logan and James Bosworth, Beyond 2012, Southern Pulse, 2012, http://www.southernpulse.com. Eduardo Guerrero-Gutiérrez, Security, Drugs, and Violence in Mexico: A Survey, 7th North American Forum, Washington, DC, October 2011 at http://iis-db.stanford.edu/evnts/6716/NAF_2011_EG_(Final).pdf. 106 Congressional Research Service 21 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence CATEGORY DESCRIPTION ORGANIZATIONS Regional Cartels These DTOs keep limited control over segments of drug trafficking routes that pass through their territory. Like the toll collector cartels, the regional cartels play a secondary role in the drug trading business and receive small profits from it and have limited capabilities to diversify to other criminal businesses like human smuggling or oil and fuel theft. The Knights Templar and South Pacific cartels Local Mafias The mafias are disbanded cells from fragmented national or regional cartels. These are locally based and their range can extend from a few contiguous localities to several states. Their business activities are mainly focused in drug distribution and dealing within their controlled municipalities, and they have extended their illegal business towards extortion, kidnapping and vehicle theft. The Resistance; Jalisco Cartel–New Generationa; Cártel del Charro; The Hands with Eyes; Los Incorriegibles; La Empresa; Independent Cartel of Acapulco; and others. Source: Eduardo Guerrero-Gutiérrez, Security, Drugs, and Violence in Mexico: A Survey, 7th North American Forum, Washington, DC, 2011. Notes: Text modified in consultation with the author on May 21, 2012. a. As mentioned earlier in the text, some analysts have begun to identify Jalisco Cartel-New Generation as a major cartel and no longer a local mafia or crime group. See, Peña Nieto’s Challenge: Criminal Cartels and Rule of Law in Mexico, especially Appendix D: Main Cartels in Mexico. A couple of generalizations can be made about the current DTO landscape. First, there is more competition and more violence. Second, few large actors remain except for the two dominant ones, Sinaloa and Los Zetas, which have become polarized rivals in their battle for supremacy. Sinaloa, based in the western part of the country, was present in some 17 states as of August 2011 according to one analysis. Los Zetas, which cover the eastern portion of the country, had operations in 21 states as of August 2011, giving them greater geographic presence.107 The Zetas had the reputation for being the most violent, but the Sinaloa cartel, trying to deliver a devastating blow to their rivals, has emulated the newer DTO’s most violent tactics. Both Sinaloa and Los Zetas have made grisly incursions into the home turf of their opponent, either directly or through proxies (smaller organizations which have affiliated with one side or the other at least temporarily).108 Character and Scope of the Increased Violence As the DTOs have fractured and more organizations vie for control of trafficking routes, the level of inter- and intra-cartel violence has spiked. Inter-DTO violence is used when the cartels fight one another to dominate trafficking routes. Besides inter-DTO violence (between the different organizations), there has been widespread violence within the organizations, as factions battle in succession struggles to replace fallen or arrested leaders. The succession battles are hastened by 107 Eduardo Guerrero-Guitiérrez, Security, Drugs, and Violence in Mexico: A Survey. Olga Rodriguez, “Mexico Drug War’s Latest Toll: 49 Headless Bodies,” Washington Times, May 14, 2012; Tracy Wilkinson, “Mexico Under Siege: Dozens of Bodies Found Dumped; Authorities Suspect a Drug Cartel, and Say Most of Victims Had Been Decapitated,” Los Angeles Times, May 14, 2012; Jo Tuckman, “Mexican Drug Cartel Massacres have Method in Their Brutal Madness,” Guardian, May 14, 2012. 108 Congressional Research Service 22 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence the drug war victories by the Mexican government. In describing the violence resulting from the elimination of a leader, one observer refers to “internal vacancy chains” that result when an organization is squeezed by the government and there is great uncertainty about how the leader will be replaced (either through internal succession or external replacement). In some cases, a weakened DTO will be attacked by other DTOs in a “feeding frenzy” until the uncertainty of succession is resolved.109 Thus highly charged violence may result from asymmetric weakening of competitive organizations.110 Intra-DTO violence is used to assert leadership inside the cartel or to impose organizational discipline and loyalty. The violent response of the DTOs to the government’s aggressive security strategy is a third key element leading to escalation. Gun battles between government forces and the DTOs are regular occurrences. And with the expansion of democratic pluralism, DTOs are fighting the state to reassert their impunity from the justice system. Drug trafficking-related violence in Mexico has been brutal, and, in an apparent contradiction, both widespread and relatively concentrated. However, since 2010 the violence has dispersed considerably to new areas and involved more municipalities. The violence, while still concentrated along drug trafficking routes and in a small percentage of Mexican municipalities, has spread to every state and flared in the northern border states. In 2011, the violence moved towards Mexico’s interior, exploding in such states as Veracruz (a Gulf state) and in Guerrero on Mexico’s southern Pacific coast. According to analysis by University of San Diego’s TransBorder Institute (TBI), at the end of 2011 84% of Mexico’s municipalities have been affected in some way by organized crime violence (with only 16% violence free) and over time violence has spread to a larger number of municipalities.111 There remains a debate about exactly how many have perished in the violence. The Calderón government released data on homicides in Mexico linked to organized crime in January 2011 and January 2012.112 In these two releases, the government reported that between December 2006 and September 2011 more than 47,500 killings were organized crime-related homicides. These official figures are about 15% to 25% higher than the tallies provided in some media reporting, such as that of the Mexican media outlet Grupo Reforma, which have been used by TBI to track violence in Mexico because the Reforma data has been released more consistently. The Reforma data are reported weekly and collected by a national network of newspaper correspondents spread across the country.113 While casualty estimates from the government and media sources have not been identical, they have reflected similar trends. All reports have shown the violence rising sharply since early 2007 and spreading to new parts of Mexico. This report gives preference to officially reported data. According to government data, in 2007 (the first full year of the Calderón government), there 109 Phil Williams, “El Crimen Organizada y la Violencia en Mexico: Una Perspectiva Comparativa,” ISTOR: Revista de Historia International, 11th Year, Number 42, Fall 2010. Professor Williams argues that the leaders of the DTOs act like medieval barons, “engaged in constant power struggles and fluid alliances,” even as their businesses have fully exploited the opportunities of 21st century globalization. 110 Ibid. 111 Cory Molzahn, Viridiana Rios, and David A. Shirk, Drug Violence in Mexico: Data and Analysis Through 2011, Trans-Border Institute, University of San Diego, March 2012. 112 Mexican government data for 2007-2010 is available at http://www.presidencia.gob.mx/base-de-datos-defallecimientos/ and data for January through September 2011 is available at http://www.pgr.gob.mx/ temas%20relevantes/estadistica/estadisticas.asp. 113 Molzahn, Rios, and Shirk, Drug Violence in Mexico: Data and Analysis Through 2011. Congressional Research Service 23 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence were more than 2,800 organized crime-related homicides, which more than doubled in 2008. Between 2008 and 2009, the rate of increase was about 40%. Between 2009 and 2010, organized crime-related homicides grew by almost 60%. Finally the rate of increase started to come down between 2010 and 2011 (see Figure 2). The government’s second data release in January 2012, only included data for the first three quarters of 2011 (January–September 2011), reporting a total of 12,903 homicides. Consequently, when measured against the same nine-month period in 2010, the number of organized crime killings grew by only 11% in 2011. The Trans-Border Institute (TBI) has observed that Mexican government information has neither been easy to access nor reported regularly or consistently. To track the violence, TBI and others have turned to Mexican media reporting. Newspapers and other media organizations keep daily tallies of the killings that are considered a close approximation of the overall situation. TBI’s Justice in Mexico project has used the data collected by the national Mexican newspaper Reforma to tabulate Mexico’s drug trafficking violence over the past decade. TBI has found that Reforma is generally more conservative and cautious about classifying a death as drug trafficking-related than are official sources and other media outlets.114 Reforma’s classification of a homicide attributed to the drug trafficking organizations is based on criminal justice protocols and the presence at the crime scene of characteristics traditionally used by DTOs, such as high-caliber weapons, decapitations, or “narco” messages.115 The possibility that other criminals could carry out murders in a manner to make them appear to be those of the DTOs is one cause to question the accuracy of the figures. Further concerns are that authorities often fail to identify and fully investigate drug trafficking-related homicides, some DTOs attempt to eliminate all evidence of murders, and some leave confusing messages either accepting blame or trying to shift it to a rival. According to the Reforma data, there were 11,583 drug traffickingrelated homicides in 2010, and according to the government database the total murders attributed to organized crime exceeded 15,270. The higher government figure may be due to a definition of organized crime which is broader than drug trafficking. But the trends in the data produced by Reforma closely correlate with those trends in the data released by the government.116 The two releases of aggregate data by the Mexican government task force in January 2011 and January 2012 had slightly different definitions. For the first release of data (January 2007– December 2010), the Mexican government labeled the information as “homicides allegedly linked to organized crime.” The second release of data (January 2011–September 2011) was defined as “homicides allegedly caused by criminal rivalry.”117 Like the Reforma data, there are a number of characteristics utilized by the government to identify such homicides. These homicides generally have not been fully investigated, so accuracy is always an issue. TBI has found that the government count was consistently about 24% greater than the Reforma count and that the media 114 TBI, Drug Violence in Mexico: Data and Analysis from 2001-2009, January 2010. Angelica Duran-Martinez, Gayle Hazard, and Viridiana Rios, 2010 Mid-Year Report on Drug Violence in Mexico, Trans-Border Institute, August 2010. 116 For a discussion of how the two sources compare, see Ríos and Shirk, Drug Violence in Mexico: Data and Analysis Through 2010, Trans-Border Institute, University of San Diego, February 2011; Molzahn, Rios, and Shirk, Drug Violence in Mexico: Data and Analysis Through 2011. 117 The January 2012 data release is further broken down in four categories: organized crime homicides (79%); Organized Crime-Government Clashes (2%); Organized Crime Direct Attack on Officials (6%); and Organized Crime Clashes (1.3%). For more details on what distinguishes these categories, see Molzahn, Rios, and Shirk, Drug Violence in Mexico: Data and Analysis Through 2011. 115 Congressional Research Service 24 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence company consistently underestimates organized crime homicides, but this has the advantage of reducing the frequency of “false positives.” Because the Mexican government released data for only three quarters of 2011, there is no “official tally” for 2011. As shown in Figure 2, the government reported nearly 13,000 organizedcrime related homicides for the first three quarters of the year. TBI has calculated the killings in the last three months of 2011, basing its projections on Reforma’s data for the last quarter of the year expanded by 24%. This estimate incorporates a decline in the level of homicides in the last quarter of 2011 observed in the Reforma data trends and therefore “provides what is probably a more precise estimate of the government’s final tally for 2011.”118 As shown in Figure 3, the TBI estimate for the entire year is slightly more than 16,400 organized crime-related homicides. The TBI data have been mapped and a geographic explanation of the violence will be addressed below. As noted above, violence did continue to rise in 2011, but far less sharply. TBI’s annual report for 2011 on the violence summarized the pace of organized crime related killings in 2011 as follows: “On average, for every day of 2011, 47 people were killed, three of whom were tortured, one of whom was decapitated, two of whom were women, and ten of whom were young people whose lives ended in organized-crime-related violence.”119 Figure 2. Organized Crime-Related Killings (2007-2011) (Reported by the Mexican Government) Source: Mexican government data for 2007-2010 is available at http://www.presidencia.gob.mx/base-de-datosde-fallecimientos/ and data for January through September 2011 is available at http://www.pgr.gob.mx/ temas%20relevantes/estadistica/estadisticas.asp. Note: The Mexican government’s Attorney General’s office (PGR) released data only for the first three quarters of 2011 (January–September). 118 119 Molzahn, Rios, and Shirk, Drug Violence in Mexico: Data and Analysis Through 2011. Ibid. Congressional Research Service 25 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence Figure 3. Organized Crime-Related Killings in Mexico in 2011 by State Source: Map created by CRS using data from the Trans-Border Institute (TBI), University of San Diego. Notes: Mexican government and TBI data drawn from presentation in Cory Molzahn, Viridiana Ríos, and David A. Shirk, Drug Violence in Mexico: Data and Analysis Through 2011, Trans-Border Institute, March 2012. There is some disagreement if the killings related to organized crime or drug trafficking in Mexico plateaued or began to decline in 2012.120 One media outlet, Milenio, even recorded a slight increase in organized crime-related killings during the year over its estimate for 2011.121 After in-depth analysis of available data from multiple sources, TBI concludes that most sources recorded a decline in such killings in 2012. Reforma, for example, recorded 9,577 organizedcrime-style homicides in 2012, (an approximate 21% decrease over their tally for 2011). The 120 The Mexican government announced in early August 2012 that there had been a 7% decline in all homicides in Mexico in the first half of 2012, and an almost 15% decline in organized-crime related homicides. However, the government did not release any data to back these claims. See “Calderon Calls for Mexico to Stay the Course,” LatinNews Daily Report, August 3, 2012; “Calderón Afirma Que Homicidios Cayeron 7% en México en Primera Mitad de 2012,” Univision, August 2, 2012. 121 Molzahn, Rodriguez Ferreira, and Shirk, Drug Violence in Mexico: Data and Analysis Through 2012. See Figure 5: Comparison of All Homicide and Organized Crime Homicide Tallies, 1990 through 2012, which reflects data from Milenio and several other sources. Congressional Research Service 26 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence Mexican government did not release organized crime-related homicide data for 2012 with the Mexican National Security System refusing to release new monthly tallies after September of 2011.122 However, the Mexican National Security System did release a figure for total intentional homicides for 2012, and it was 8.5% lower than its estimate for 2011. TBI asserts that “organized-crime-style killings represented a major share of all homicides in Mexico,” after an analysis of several sources.123 Furthermore, many analysts have projected that a decline in organized-crime-style killings in 2013 is likely to occur more slowly than the rapid rise in such killings between December 2006 and December 2011. Despite President Peña Nieto’s call for reducing homicides related to organized crime by as much as 50%, such a sharp decline is unlikely to take place in the immediate future. This is borne out by data from the first three months of 2013 which reflected monthly tallies of approximately 1,000 organized-crime-style homicides, close to monthly averages in recent years.124 Casualty Estimates for Special Populations The Trans-Border Institute has tracked violent crimes against journalists, mayors, and other special groups. Violent crimes targeting journalists, and high levels of impunity for perpetrators of those crimes, have caused Mexico to be ranked among the most dangerous places in the world to work as a journalist in recent years. In the first half of 2012, at least six journalists were slain in Mexico, several in the troubled state of Veracruz. As previously noted, according to TBI’s Justice in Mexico tally, ten journalists and “media support” workers were killed in 2012, and a total of 74 journalists and media support workers were killed in organized-crime-style homicides between 2006 and 2012. 125 Crime against journalists runs from harassment to murder, and often causes journalists to self-censor their work and news outlets to stop publishing or broadcasting stories on violent crime. In response to the spike in journalist murders and criticism that the Mexican judiciary was not resolving such cases, the Calderón government took some steps in 2011 to improve security measures for journalists at risk of being victimized (frequently those include reporters who cover crime or government corruption beats). In April 2012, a law to enhance protection for journalists and human rights defenders passed both houses of the Mexican Congress. Nevertheless, media groups and other observers have expressed support for beleaguered Mexican media that are being pressured by the DTOs to not cover the violence. They have also criticized the Mexican government for not extending adequate protection. Organized crime is also reported to be targeting citizens who use social media to report on the violence. In some cities, social media such as Twitter have become an important news source because traditional news outlets have 122 Ibid. TBI notes that the Mexican National Security System (Sistema Nacional de Seguridad Pública (SNSP) in Spanish) “refused to release its data on organized-crime-style homicides beyond September 2011.” 123 Ibid., p. 16. 124 For tallies in 2013, see “EPN Backed by 50% of Mexicans,” LatinNews Daily Report, April 2, 2013. See also, Tracy Wilkinson and Cecilia Sanchez, “Mexico Government Downplays Deadly Violence: The Mexico Propaganda Campaing Has Some Success as Think Tanks and Newspapers Ignore Facts on the Ground and Promote Discussion of the Economy over Violence,” Los Angeles Times, April 11, 2013. Most analysts contend that violence levels will not change rapidly, and note that the Peña Nieto government has only been in place a short time. 125 TBI’s Justice in Mexico tally published in its 2012 annual report on drug violence in Mexico broadened its criteria from data previously published in this report. The new TBI criteria includes “...journalists and media support workers employed with a recognized news organization at the time of their deaths, as well as independent, free-lance, and former journalists and media-support workers.” See TBI, Drug Violence in Mexico: Data and Analysis Through 2012. Congressional Research Service 27 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence been silenced by threats from reporting on violent crime. However, in 2011 and 2012 several social media providers including widely read bloggers were threatened and some were killed.126 Pressure from organized crime is often greatest at the local level. According to TBI’s tally, a total of 45 mayors and former mayors were victims of organized- crime-style homicides between 2006 and 2012. The number of mayors assassinated spiked in 2010, but was still high in 2012 with eight mayors and ex-mayors killed. In President Peña Nieto’s first month in office (December 2012), a former mayor from the state of San Luis Potosí was killed becoming the first such killing in the new administration.127 Another population hard hit by the violence is young people between 15 and 29 years of age. The Mexican newspaper El Universal reported that drug trafficking-related violence had become the leading cause of death for young people in recent years, growing 10-fold between 2007 and 2010.128 Not all victims are known because of the widespread problem of disappearances. In February 2013, the Peña Nieto administration announced that more than 26,000 people had been reported missing during the Calderón administration. The register had been compiled by the Calderón government but not released publicly. The Peña Nieto administration announced it would seek to verify all those listed. The numbers reported even exceeded the more than 16,000 disappearances that had been counted by Mexico’s National Human Rights Commission during the first five and half years of the Calderón government.129 Locations of the Violence and Its Impact on Tourism and Business As the violence in Mexico has sharply increased over the past several years, it has also shifted locations. Drug trafficking-related violence once highly concentrated near Mexico’s northern border with the United States shifted geographically in 2011 and 2012 moving from northwestern and north-central Mexico to northeastern and central Mexico.130 As it has spread to new locations, the fear of violence has closed businesses and had an impact on tourism. American investors in Mexico have grown concerned about the violence and businesses have sent home dependents or closed operations altogether in some cities. Small and medium-sized businesses have been particularly hard hit, without the resources to hire private security firms and provide for employee safety as have the larger businesses and multinational corporations.131 In 2011, the Mexican government published a report indicating that foreign direct investment (FDI) has continued to pour into some of the most violent states at levels exceeding the investment prior to 2006, but others argue that job-creating investment was moving into safer cities where drug traffickingrelated violence was lower.132 126 Larisa Epatko, “Mexican Drug Cartels’ New Target: Bloggers,” PBS Newshour, October 13, 2011; Melissa Del Bosque, “Tweeting the Disappeared,” The Texas Observer, April 2012. 127 Molzahn, Rodriguez Ferreira, and Shirk, Drug Violence in Mexico: Data and Analysis Through 2012. 128 Molzahn, Rios, and Shirk, Drug Violence in Mexico: Data and Analysis Through 2011. 129 International Crisis Group, Peña Nieto’s Challenge: Criminal Cartels and Rule of Law in Mexico. 130 Molzahn, Rodriguez Ferreira, and Shirk, Drug Violence in Mexico: Data and Analysis Through 2012. 131 Dora Beszterczey and Shannon O'Neil, “Breaking the Cycle,” Americas Quarterly, Winter 2011. This source notes that as many as 10,000 businesses have closed down in Ciudad Juárez alone, while the city’s unemployment rate soared from “virtually zero” to 20% in the last three years. 132 Nacha Cattan, “Is Violence in Mexico Affecting Foreign Investment? No, Say Recent Reports,” Christian Science Monitor, August 8, 2011; Secretaría de Economia, Subsecretaria de la Inversión Extrajera Directa (IED) a Nivel Nacional y Subnacional: Seguridad y Otros Factores, July 27, 2011. Congressional Research Service 28 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence In 2008, drug trafficking-related violence was concentrated in a few cities and states. About 60% of the killings took place in three cities: Tijuana (Baja California), Culiacán (Sinaloa), and highly contested Ciudad Juárez (Chihuahua). By far, the largest number of drug trafficking-related deaths took place in Ciudad Juárez, a city of approximately 1.3 million inhabitants across the border from El Paso, TX. The Mexican border city is where the conflict between the Sinaloa and Juárez DTOs is most focused. (Mexico’s National Public Security Council estimates that 36% of the drug trafficking-related deaths in Mexico’s drug war from December 2006 through July 2010 could be attributed to the conflict centered in Ciudad Juárez.)133 According to the U.S. State Department and media reports, some 3,100 people were killed in Ciudad Juárez in 2010 alone, making it one of the most violent cities in the world.134 However, in 2011 total homicides in Ciudad Juárez declined to 1,933, still the most violent city in Mexico, but behind San Pedro Sula, Honduras, now estimated to be the city with the highest homicide rate in the world.135 (This shift suggests the epicenter of drug trafficking-related violence may be moving into Central America. For more background, see CRS Report R41731, Central America Regional Security Initiative: Background and Policy Issues for Congress.) Starting in 2009, the violence spread to new areas throughout the country for the usual reasons: changing alliances and competition between and within the DTOs, the succession struggles when leaders are taken down or eliminated, and expanding DTO efforts to corrupt and intimidate officials to permit the trade.136 The intense government crackdown using army and navy forces and the Mexican Federal Police has provoked a violent response from the DTOs to communicate their lack of fear of the government. Meanwhile, Mexico’s law enforcement and courts have been ineffective in investigating and prosecuting the perpetrators of violence, leaving the DTOs to continue their attacks free of legal consequences. Violence spread from near the border in northern Mexico south to the states of Durango and Guerrero in 2009, with homicides doubling in both states.137 As in 2009, violence in 2010 continued along the U.S./Mexico border, including the states of Chihuahua, Nuevo León, and Tamaulipas (the latter two states being the locus of the 2010 conflict between the Zetas and the Gulf DTOs), and with notable increases in Sinaloa, Guerrero, Durango, and the state of Mexico.138 In 2010, some of the Central Pacific states experienced a large increase in violent activity, including Jalisco and Nayarit. Violence in the Central Pacific states (including the state 133 Mexican Federal Government, “Información Sobre el Fenómeno Delictivo en México,” August 2010; David Shirk, “Mexican Government Reveals Distribution of Drug Violence,” Justice in Mexico blog, Trans-Border Institute, http://justiceinmexico.org/2010/08/28/. 134 U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Consular Affairs, Travel Warning: Mexico, April 22, 2011, http://travel.state.gov/travel/cis_pa_tw/tw/tw_5440.html; Andrew Rice, “The End of America: Why Mexico’s Pain is El Paso’s Gain,” New York Times, July 31, 2011. 135 U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Consular Affairs, Travel Warning: Mexico, February 8, 2012, at http://travel.state.gov/travel/cis_pa_tw/tw/tw_5665.html; Seguridad, Justicia, y Paz, “San Pedro Sula La Ciudad Más Violenta del Mundo; Juárez, La Segunda,” January 11, 2012, at http://www.seguridadjusticiaypaz.org.mx/sala-deprensa/541-san-pedro-sula-la-ciudad-mas-violenta-del-mundo-juarez-la-segunda. According to this Mexican NGO, the most violent city in the world was San Pedro Sula, Honduras, in 2011, with Ciudad Juárez second (although still the most violent in Mexico). 136 The choice of “silver or lead” (either a bribe or a bullet) is forced on many government officials by Mexico’s drug traffickers. See Finnegan, “Silver or Lead.” 137 TBI, Justice in Mexico, January 2010 News Report. 138 Duran-Martinez, Hazard, and Rios, 2010 Mid-Year Report on Drug Violence in Mexico. Congressional Research Service 29 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence of Mexico, Guerrero, Morelos, Jalisco, and Nayarit) has been attributed to the conflict between factions of the Beltrán Leyva organization, La Familia Michoacana, and the Sinaloa DTO.139 The violence is highly concentrated along key drug routes and within a relatively few cities and towns. In August 2010, a Mexican government report on 28,000 homicides linked to organized crime (from December 2006 through July 2010), revealed that 80% of drug trafficking-related homicides occurred in 162 of Mexico’s 2,456 municipalities (less than 7%).140 Through additional analysis of municipal-level data in late 2010, analyst Eduardo Guerrero identified six clusters of the most violent municipalities.141 The 36 municipalities he classified as the most violent were located in five states (there were two high-violence zones in the border state of Chihuahua). Guerrero argued that if an effective anti-violence strategy targeted those zones, the drug trafficking-related violence could be reduced.142 According to recent analysis by the Trans-Border Institute, the worst violence in Mexico has continued to be located in less than 10% of Mexico’s municipalities.143 In 2011, the violence continued to grow and spread. While violence in Baja California and Chihuahua declined somewhat, it spiked in Tamaulipas, Coahuila, and Nuevo León, the northeastern border states (see Figure 3). The Gulf DTO struggled to dislodge the Zetas from Monterrey, Nuevo León, the major industrial and financial hub 140 miles from the Texas border, producing a near-paralyzing conflict that frightened business owners and destroyed the city’s reputation as one of Mexico’s safest cities.144 The six border states with the United States continued to experience a majority of the violence. According to government data, Mexico’s northern border states accounted for 44% of the homicides in 2011, down from 50% in 2010. Reductions in Tijuana and Juárez were offset by increases in Monterrey and elsewhere,145 and violence dispersed south toward Mexico’s interior—the populace center of the country. In other words, violence remained high in crucial transit regions near the border and along the coasts, but it dispersed to a greater number of cities and states. In 2011, violence in the coastal state of Sinaloa declined in comparison with the prior year, but increased in Guerrero and Michoácan further south. Jalisco, home to Mexico’s second-largest city, Guadalajara, saw violence flare, and, in the latter half of 2011, Veracruz became a hot spot with incursions against Los Zetas in territory they had dominated. The discoveries of mass graves in Durango and Tamaulipas in the middle of the year added to the drug trafficking death tolls in those states.146 While drug trafficking-related killings remain concentrated in a relatively few cities, the violence is spreading to more populated and economically important urban centers. Killings, kidnappings, and other violence have dramatically increased in Monterrey, Mexico’s third-largest city. The resort city of Acapulco, a seaport in Guerrero state, experienced a sharp increase in violence and 139 TBI, Justice in Mexico, November 2010 News Report. Mexican Federal Government, “Información Sobre el Fenómeno Delictivo en México,” August 2010; David Shirk, “Mexican Government Reveals Distribution of Drug Violence,” Justice in Mexico blog, Trans-Border Institute, http://justiceinmexico.org/2010/08/28/. 141 Eduardo Guerrero Gutiérrez, “Cómo Reducir La Violencia en México,” Nexos en Línea,” November 3, 2010. 142 Ibid. 143 TBI, Drug Violence in Mexico: Data and Analysis Through 2012. 144 Nik Steinberg, “The Monster and Monterrey: The Politics and Cartels of Mexico’s Drug War,” The Nation, May 25, 2011; David Luhnow, “Expats Flee Drug War in Mexico’s No. 3 City,” Wall Street Journal, September 11, 2010. 145 Molzahn, Ríos, and Shirk, Drug Violence in Mexico: Data and Analysis Through 2011. 146 TBI, Justice in Mexico: June 2011 News Report. 140 Congressional Research Service 30 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence was the second-most violent city in Mexico in 2011 and the most violent in 2012 (with a homicide rate of 148 per 100,000). Guadalajara, Mexico’s second-largest city, saw increasing violence in 2011 and continued to experience incidents in 2012.147 Finally, Nuevo Laredo in Tamaulipas state has again been immersed in conflict as Los Zetas defend their important stronghold in one of the busiest land ports handling U.S.-Mexico trade.148 In 2012, the Trans-Border Institute maintained, after examining several sources, that violence either plateaued or declined. Similar to other years, TBI notes that violence diminished in some states (including Baja California, Sonora, and Chihuahua) while increasing in others, including those states located in the central and eastern border region and the Central Pacific coast. One interesting conclusion in TBI’s analysis is that the geographic dispersion of the violence (defined as the number of cartel- or DTO-related deaths) may have diminished or narrowed from 2011 to 2012.149 According to some estimates, the violence costs the country roughly one percentage point of annual economic growth.150 However, Mexico’s economy grew by 3.9% in 2011 and 2012151 and the government has argued that overall growth and foreign investment have not been harmed. In April 2012, the government vigorously denied the claim of an important national employers’ federation (Coparmex) that violence and threats of violence caused 160,000 businesses to leave Mexico in 2011.152 Similarly, with regard to tourism the record is mixed. While the U.S. government has issued increasingly foreboding travel warnings and tourism has declined in the border region, more than 22 million tourists visited Mexico in 2011, breaking records set in 2008.153 Some of this increase can be attributed to policies adopted by the Calderón government to make tourism more attractive to foreign visitors. The government touted the decline in violence in Ciudad Juárez in 2011 as evidence that their law enforcement efforts and social reforms had worked. But another possible cause is that the rival Sinaloa DTO and Carillo Fuentes/Juárez DTO have come to some accommodation on use of the drug corridor. According to many assessments, the Sinaloa DTO has emerged as the most powerful DTO in Mexico.154 It has successfully pushed into Baja California and Chihuahua, which were once controlled by the Tijuana and Juárez DTOs. Some analysts have speculated that Sinaloa’s dominance may be the reason for a decline in violence in both border cities.155 Recently, some analysts have identified Tijuana as an example of a qualified success in its reduction of violence. They maintain that Tijuana’s significantly lower number of homicides resulted from an effective government strategy of building trust and communication between civil society and enforcement authorities, which was aided by a respected policing role for the military. 147 For a vivid description of increasing violence in Guadalajara, see William Finnegan, “The Kingpins,” The New Yorker, July 2, 2012. 148 STRATFOR, “Mexico Security Memo: The Value of Nuevo Laredo,” March 7, 2012. 149 TBI, Drug Violence in Mexico: Data and Analysis Through 2012. 150 David Luhnow, “Mexico Economy Withstands Drug War,” Wall Street Journal, November 22, 2011. 151 Economist Intelligence Unit, Country Report: Mexico, March 2013. 152 “Mexico Denies that Firms Are Leaving Over Security,” LatinNews Daily, April 5, 2012. 153 Kenan Christiansen, “Tourism Up, Mexico Aims for Non-U.S. Visitors,” New York Times, March 4, 2012. 154 See, for example, STRATFOR, “The Evolution of Mexican Drug Cartels’ Areas of Influence,” April 28, 2011; STRATFOR, “Mexican Drug Wars Update: Targeting the Most Violent Cartels,” July 21, 2011. 155 Ibid; Guy Taylor, “Life Stirs Anew in ‘Murder Capital’ Juarez,” Washington Times, May 27, 2012. Congressional Research Service 31 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence Furthermore, the DTOs operating in Tijuana were broken up but retained sufficient organizational coherence to order a reduction in violence in response to a well-executed and targeted “hot spot” policing effort.156 Major tourist destinations, such as Acapulco, Cancún, Cuernavaca, Mazatlan, and Taxco, have been hit by violence, and the economically vital tourist industry has been affected. As noted above, tourism along the U.S.-Mexico border has also suffered a dramatic decline because of fears of violence. According to the U.S. State Department, foreign tourists have not been a DTO target. But there have been several incidents of Mexican tourists becoming victims. The State Department’s travel warning updated in February 2012 reported that the number of Americans murdered in Mexico rose from 35 in 2007 to 120 in 2011.157 One consequence of the intense violence in many municipalities is the displacement of residents fleeing for safety. The Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre estimated in December 2010 that 230,000 persons were displaced, roughly half of whom fled to the United States. The other estimated 115,000 were internally displaced persons inside Mexico.158 According to the Monitoring Centre’s annual report covering 2011, about 140,000 people have been displaced by drug-cartel violence since 2007. The report criticizes the Mexican government for not initiating a program to recognize or assist this population.159 However, in contrast to this finding, the United Nations has identified only 1,570 people as a “population of concern” inside Mexico as of January 2011.160 In addition, many Mexican nationals fearing that they could be victims of the violence (including journalists and law enforcement officers) have sought asylum in the United States.161 According to the U.S. Department of Justice, there were 6,133 requests for asylum from Mexico in FY2011, about double the number of requests made in the prior year, and only 104 requests (1.7%) were granted.162 156 Rios and Aguilera, “Keys to Reducing Violence in Mexico: Targeted Policing and Civic Engagement.” The State Department does not identify which murders may be attributed to the drug trafficking-related violence or organized crime, although the recent travel warnings do describe the heightened risk caused by transnational criminal organizations (TCOs) in different parts of the country. U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Consular Affairs, Travel Warning: Mexico, February 8, 2012, at http://travel.state.gov/travel/cis_pa_tw/tw/tw_5665.html 158 Norwegian Refugee Council—Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre, “Briefing Paper on Forced Displacement in Mexico due to Drug Cartel Violence,” December 2010. 159 Norwegian Refugee Council—Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre, Global Overview 2011: People Internally Displaced by Conflict and Violence, April 2012, at http://www.unhcr.org/IDMC/IDMC-report.pdf 160 For further information, see profile of Mexico on the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) website at http://www.unhcr.org/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/page?page=49e492706&submit=GO 161 Patricia Giovine, “More Mexicans Fleeing the Drug War Seek U.S. Asylum,” Chicago Tribune, July 14, 2011. 162 U.S. Department of Justice, Executive Office for Immigration Review, Office of Planning, Analysis, and Technology, Immigration Courts, FY2011 Asylum Statistics, at http://www.justice.gov/eoir/efoia/FY11AsyStatsCurrent.pdf 157 Congressional Research Service 32 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence Mexico’s Antidrug Strategy and Reaction163 President Calderón’s military-led crackdown on the drug trafficking organizations was at the center of his domestic policy, having launched his aggressive approach almost immediately after coming to office in December 2006. In the course of his campaign, he deployed 50,000 Mexican military forces—at its height in 2011 reportedly 96,000 troops were engaged—and thousands of federal police around the country to combat the DTOs.164 A leading element of the strategy was to confront and dismantle the drug trafficking organizations by going after the high-value targets: the leadership of the major DTOs. The DTOs fought back vigorously, refusing to allow law enforcement actions to take place and making an all-out effort to neutralize repressive measures. The DTOs also demonstrated an unanticipated resilience as their leadership was arrested or killed. Mexico’s former Secretary of Public Security, Genaro Garcia Luna, and others acknowledged that removing the high-value targets or kingpins at the top of the organizations did not succeed in paralyzing the DTOs because in most cases the organizations simply transferred power to new and sometimes more violent leaders.165 An additional complexity was that the drug organizations were adapting and transforming themselves from hierarchical and vertical organizations to become more multi-nodal and horizontal in their structure. Some of the DTOs adopted a more decentralized and networked model with independent cell-like structures that made it harder for law enforcement to dismantle.166 As the Mexican military shifted resources to pursue leaders of the DTOs, the military appeared to have fewer resources to devote to older missions such as eradication efforts. This may have contributed to increases in the cultivation of opium and marijuana, and production of heroin and methamphetamine, which, unfortunately, increased the income for the DTOs. 163 For a fuller discussion of the Calderón government’s strategy see CRS Report RL32724, Mexico and the 112th Congress, by Clare Ribando Seelke. The report identifies a broad-based strategy that included (1) carrying out joint police-military operations to support local authorities and citizens; (2) increasing the operational and technical capacities of the state; (3) initiating legal and institutional reforms; (4) strengthening crime prevention and social programs; and (5) strengthening international cooperation (such as the Mérida Initiative and Beyond Mérida). 164 Ken Ellingwood, “An Agony of Its Own; Some See a Colombian Parallel to Mexico’s Drug Violence. But as the U.S. Considers Its Options, It’s the Differences that Will Count,” Los Angeles Times, September 26, 2010; Randal C. Archibold, “Adding to Unease of a Drug War Alliance,” New York Times, May 30, 2012; Claire O’Neill McCleskey, “Mexican Generals Charged with Drug Trafficking,” In Sight Crime: Organized Crime in the Americas, August 1, 2012. The last article notes that the 50,000 troops deployed by President Calderón since 2006 were sent to 14 of Mexico’s 32 states. See also, International Crisis Group, Peña Nieto’s Challenge: Criminal Cartels and Rule of Law in Mexico. In this 2013 report, the authors state that in 2011 96,000 Mexican troops were engaged, roughly 40% of all active personnel. 165 One former drug operative in Mexico described the dilemma in an interview. “Trying to stop the gangsters ‘is like mowing the grass….You can cut it down. But it always grows back.’” See “Under the Volcano,” Economist, October 16, 2010. See also Daniel Kurtz-Phelan, “The Long War of Genaro Garcia Luna,” New York Times, July 13, 2008. 166 The evolution is described by Luis Astorga and David Shirk as a move from centralized, hierarchical structures to “an increasingly multi-polar constellation of trafficking organizations with varying specializations and capacities in the late 1990s and 2000s.” Luis Astorga and David A. Shirk, Drug Trafficking Organizations and Counter-Drug Strategies in the U.S.-Mexican Context, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars Mexico Institute, Working Paper Series on U.S.-Mexico Security Cooperation, May 2010, p. 25. See also Juan Carlos Garzón, Mafia & Co.: The Criminal Networks in Mexico, Brazil, and Colombia, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, June 2008. This evolution in the structure of criminal groups to new models is also described in CRS Report R41547, Organized Crime: An Evolving Challenge for U.S. Law Enforcement, by Jerome P. Bjelopera and Kristin M. Finklea. Congressional Research Service 33 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence In carrying out his antidrug strategy, President Calderón demonstrated an unprecedented willingness to collaborate with the United States, and the United States responded with new trust and respect for its Mexican partners. U.S.-Mexican security cooperation was structured upon the Mérida Initiative, a bilateral counterdrug and security effort first funded in 2008.167 The initiative, as it was originally conceived by Presidents George W. Bush and Felipe Calderón, was to end with the FY2010 budget cycle. The focus evolved from providing hardware to Mexican security forces to modernizing and strengthening institutions of law enforcement and the judiciary. A successor to the Mérida Initiative—called “Beyond Mérida”—was introduced by the Obama administration in the FY2011 budget request. The “four pillars” of that current strategy are (1) disrupting organized crime groups; (2) institutionalizing the rule of law; (3) building a 21stcentury border; and (4) building strong and resilient communities. Following a brutal massacre of 15 youth at a party in Ciudad Juárez in January 2010, President Calderón made a series of visits to the besieged border city and announced that police and military action alone were insufficient to address Juárez’s problems. Within weeks, the Calderón administration released a plan, “Todos Somos Juárez,” to address social causes that sustain the drug trade such as unemployment and a weak education system, which paralleled Pillar 4 of the Beyond Mérida strategy.168 In addition, the Calderón government capitalized on the sharing of U.S. intelligence and vigorously responded to extradition requests of suspects wanted by the United States.169 The Calderón administration also initiated a major restructuring of the Mexican judicial system and successfully expanded and restructured the Mexican Federal Police. Some of the change enacted included increasing federal police pay, hiring better educated officers, and enacting procedures to vet and train officers to help combat corruption. Yet by the end of Calderón’s term, efforts to reform the Attorney General’s Ministerial Police lagged and steep challenges remained in cleaning up and reforming Mexico’s many municipal and state forces that number over 300,000 personnel. The Mexican military was initially to be in the forefront of the government’s counterdrug campaign as an interim measure until enough police could be vetted, trained, and equipped to be given the lead in the public security function. Because the pace of police and justice reform was slow, the Calderón government retained the military in its lead role until the end of the President’s term. Persistent police corruption also slowed progress and was evident from the August 2010 purge of the federal police in which more than 3,000 officers were fired. On the other hand, four high-ranking army officers (three of them generals) were arrested for suspicion of drug trafficking and corruption in May 2012.170 On July 31, 2012, a Mexican federal judge charged them (now three former officers and one active duty general) with criminal links to the Beltrán Leyva Organization (BLO). Included was retired army general Tomas Angeles Dauahare, who had served as Deputy Secretary of Defense under Calderón from 2006 to 2008.171 Some analysts 167 For background on the Mérida Initiative and its successor Beyond Mérida, see CRS Report R41349, U.S.-Mexican Security Cooperation: The Mérida Initiative and Beyond , by Clare Ribando Seelke and Kristin M. Finklea. 168 Estrategia Todos Somos Juárez, http://www.todossomosjuarez.gob.mx/estrategia/index.html 169 One of the earliest successes of the Calderón counterdrug strategy was the extradition of Osiel Cardenas Guillen (the notorious leader of the Gulf DTO) to the United States in January 2007. Extraditions have increased significantly under President Calderón. For example, in 2009, the Mexican government extradited a record 107 suspects to the United States, 94 in 2010, and 93 in 2011. For more background, see CRS Report R41349, U.S.-Mexican Security Cooperation: The Mérida Initiative and Beyond , by Clare Ribando Seelke and Kristin M. Finklea 170 Randal C. Archibold, “Mexico Holds 3 Generals Said to Aid Drug Cartels,” New York Times, May 19, 2012; Randal C. Archibold, “Adding to Unease of a Drug War Alliance,” New York Times, May 30, 2012. 171 Claire O’Neill McCleskey, “Mexican Generals Charged with Drug Trafficking,” In Sight Crime: Organized Crime (continued...) Congressional Research Service 34 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence suggested that the outcome of this sensitive case could affect the legacy of Calderón’s security strategy.172 The military is highly esteemed in Mexico, but since being given a major role in the Calderón antidrug campaign it has been dogged by allegations of corruption and violations of human rights (charges most frequently directed toward the Mexican Army). However, supporters of the Calderón strategy maintained that the only viable option for the state to confront wellarmed DTOs equipped with military-style weapons was to use the well-armed military. Another challenge for the Calderón strategy and now for the government of President Peña Nieto has been a rise in drug abuse in Mexico, especially in border cities such as Ciudad Juárez and Tijuana, and the gang warfare that broke out to gain control of the domestic drug trade.173 Local drug dealing increased because drugs headed for the U.S. market were being stopped from going over the border. Gangs that are hired by the DTOs for protection and other “outsourced” services are paid in “product” (illegal drugs) and need to convert the drugs to cash. Fighting to control street corner sales, DTO-supplied gangs are killing each other in border cities and elsewhere. Unemployment, caused by the economic downturn and businesses fleeing the violence, has also provided ready recruits for the gangs, who are frequently hired by the DTOs to fight as their proxies. President Peña Nieto has emphasized his support for crime prevention strategies that include outreach to impoverished youth. In order to improve intelligence sharing and increase U.S. support for Mexico’s struggle against organized crime, binational cooperation in 2011 included the deployment of U.S. unmanned aerial vehicles to gather intelligence on DTO activities174 and the opening of a compound to gather intelligence in northern Mexico.175 The compound, reportedly staffed by DEA, Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), and civilian personnel from the Pentagon’s Northern Command, was to be modeled on “fusion intelligence centers” operated by the United States in Afghanistan and Iraq.176 How closely the United States and the new Peña Nieto government will collaborate on these efforts and other cooperative ventures remains to be determined. Public Response Polls taken during the Calderón administration indicated that many Mexicans believed the DTOs were winning the conflict and the government’s programs had little impact on improving citizen security or reducing violence. For example, a survey conducted by Pew Research Center and published in late August 2011 found that less than half (45%) believed the government was (...continued) in the Americas, August 1, 2012; Randal C. Archibold, "Mexico: Former Defense Officials Are Accused of Aiding Traffickers," New York Times, August 2, 2012. The judge also charged members of the BLO including Hector Valdez (alias “La Barbie”) who is thought to have implicated the army officials in his testimony. 172 Ibid. 173 Thousands of gang members in both the United States and Mexico serve the Mexican DTOs. In Ciudad Juárez there are an estimated 500 gangs with a combined membership of between 15,000 to 25,000 persons. Eduardo Guerrero Gutiérrez, “Cómo Reducir La Violencia en México.” 174 Ginger Thompson and Mark Mazzetti, “U.S. Drones Fly Deep in Mexico to Fight Drugs,” New York Times, March 16, 2011. 175 Ginger Thompson, “U.S. Widens Its Role in Battle Against Mexico’s Drug Cartels,” New York Times, August 7, 2011. 176 Ibid. Congressional Research Service 35 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence making progress in the campaign against the DTOs.177 However, the Pew study had some interesting additional findings. The Mexican public, while appalled at the violence, continued to back the use of the Mexican military as part of the Calderón government’s antidrug campaign (83% of respondents). This apparent support for the military’s role in the antidrug effort came despite a popular movement protesting abuses by the military, which gained ground in 2011 (see below). According to the Pew survey, a larger fraction said they would support American military assistance (38%) than in prior years, and nearly three-quarters of respondents indicated they welcomed U.S. assistance to train the Mexican police and the military.178 A May 2012 poll conducted by the Dallas Morning News and the Mexican newspaper El Universal found that 64% of Mexican voters approved of the Mexican military taking a lead role in the fight against organized crime whereas only 21% said they thought the strategy was working.179 President Calderón confronted the emergence of a peace movement led by Mexican poet Javier Sicilia, whose son was killed by drug gangs in Cuernavaca in March 2011. Sicilia, who heads the Movement for Peace with Justice and Dignity, met several times with President Calderón. He organized a peace caravan across Mexico, led a peace caravan across the United States in September 2012, and held many other demonstrations in Mexico City. Sicilia urged President Calderón to abandon his military-led strategy, which he and some of his supporters maintained caused violence and human rights abuses by security forces. They proposed a new approach focused on combating poverty, inequality, and unemployment, which they maintained contributed to the rising violence.180 The perceived failure of President Calderón’s security strategy to win broad public support was certainly a factor in his party’s loss of the presidency in 2012. Many observers suggested the Calderón approach had stimulated DTO rivalries and intra-DTO battles for succession thus increasing violence and the number of civilians caught in “drug war” crossfire. In addition, the operations of Mexico’s security forces led to complaints of human rights violations that include forced disappearances, torture, and arbitrary detention.181 As a candidate of the PRI party which had ruled Mexico for decades prior to 2000, Enrique Peña Nieto pledged to make combating violent crime a priority. During his successful campaign and afterwards, Peña Nieto spoke about cutting violent crime by as much as 50% and that his efforts would be results driven. In his first months in office, however, President Pena Nieto focused on other reforms rather than security. Some critics argued his plans for security lacked definition and remained hazy after his first 100 days in office.182 177 Pew Research Center, “Crime and Drug Cartels Top Concerns in Mexico,” Press Release, August 31, 2011. The study can be accessed at http://pewglobal.org/files/2011/08/Pew-Global-Attitudes-Mexico-Report-FINAL-August-312011.pdf. 178 Ibid. See also, Sara Miller Llana, “In Drug War, Mexico Warms to the U.S.,” Christian Science Monitor: Daily News Briefing, September 2, 2011. 179 Alfredo Corchado, “Most Mexicans Want U.S. to Take a Bigger Role in Fighting Violence, Poll Finds,” Dallas Morning News, May 13, 2012. 180 Candace Vallantin, “Mexicans Campaign to End Drug War; Renowned Poet Puts Down his Pen to Focus on a Caravan For Peace,” Toronto Star, June 7, 2011. 181 Human Rights Watch, Neither Rights nor Security; testimony from Hearing of the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission, “Human Rights in Mexico,” May 10, 2012; Catherine Daly, Kimberly Heinle, and David A. Shirk, Armed with Impunity: Curbing Military Human Rights Abuses in Mexico, Trans-Border Institute, Special Report, July 2012. 182 Richard Fausset, “A Traditionalist Shines Through Mexico’s Fresh New Face,” Los Angeles Times, March 10, 2013. Congressional Research Service 36 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence In the meantime, press reports of increasing vigilantism or self-appointed self-defense groups have mushroomed in 2013 with the press citing the rise of such groups in the states of Veracruz, Guererro, and Michoacán. The phenomena of rural self defense groups or community police in more remote indigenous areas have a long history in Mexico because of a lack of access to justice services in those territories. These new groups which have appeared in 2013 are claiming that local, state, and federal authorities are not adequately protecting their communities from organized crime threats and they have taken up arms in order to do the job. State governments have responded in various ways to this new “vigilante movement” with acceptance or toleration in some cases, denial in others, while some officials have criticized the new groups because they undermine legitimate government authority. In one instance in March 2013, federal authorities arrested 34 members of a self-defense group in Michoacán for their alleged ties to Jalisco CartelNew Generation. The rise of these groups is a growing concern for the Peña Nieto government.183 Trends and Outlook Notwithstanding how the violence is characterized, a few trends are apparent. First, the drugtrafficking related violence continued to rise from December 2006 through December 2011. Many observers contend that during President Calderón’s six-year term there were more than 60,000 organized crime-related homicides, with another 26,000 Mexicans reported missing. In 2012, a number of sources registered a decrease of organized-crime-related killings over the prior year, although how significant a decline cannot be determined from available data. Nevertheless, the level of homicides is still quite elevated, and few analysts anticipate a steep reduction of Mexico’s violence level in the near term. Second, the violence is concentrated in a few cities and towns, with 80% of the deaths concentrated in slightly under 7% of Mexico’s municipalities, according to Mexican government data released in August 2010.184 According to the newer Mexican government data, violence in 2010 continued to be concentrated in relatively few cities, with over 70% of the violence in just 80 municipalities.185 In 2011, violence dispersed to a greater number of cities. While the five most violent cities accounted for roughly 32% of the violence in 2010, they accounted for about 24% of the violence in 2011.186 However, according to the Trans-Border Institute, the geographic dispersion of the violence decreased in 2012. Third, with the caveat that the actual number of homicides is unknown and most homicides are never thoroughly investigated and many go unreported, it is fair to conclude that the violence is largely targeted at people with ties to the drug trafficking organizations because much of the violence is between and within the organizations. During the Calderón administration, the government maintained that more than 90% of the casualties (or those who died since President Calderón’s crackdown began in December 2006) were individuals involved with or linked in 183 Felbab-Brown, Peña Nieto’s Piñata: The Promise and Pitfalls of Mexico’s New Security Policy against Organized Crime; TBI, “Vigilante Justice,” in News Monitor March 2013; Richard Fausset and Cecilia Sanchez, “Worry Grows over Mexico Vigilante Movement,” Los Angeles Times, April 11, 2013. 184 Mexican Federal Government, “Información Sobre el Fenómeno Delictivo en México,” August 2010; David Shirk, “Mexican Government Reveals Distribution of Drug Violence,” Justice in Mexico blog, Trans-Border Institute, http://justiceinmexico.org/2010/08/28/. 185 Ríos and Shirk, Drug Violence in Mexico: Data and Analysis Through 2010. 186 Molzahn, Rios, and Shirk, Drug Violence in Mexico: Data and Analysis Through 2011. Congressional Research Service 37 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence some way to the criminal activities of the DTOs. Few of these drug trafficking-related homicides, however, were adequately investigated or prosecuted. Critics, however, have questioned this assertion and noted it does little to mitigate the growing alarm of the Mexican public about violent crime. The number of Mexican security forces (military and police) killed is believed to be approximately 6-7% of the total, although estimates vary. According to TBI, between 2008 to 2012, 2,539 police officers and 204 military personnel were victims of organized crime style homicides. TBI notes that local police are by far the most vulnerable. Some of the deaths of Mexican officials may involve individuals who at some time colluded with one DTO or another. Until recently, the Mexican government maintained that most of the victims are tied to the DTOs and suggested the extensive violence should be seen as a sign of success. Fourth, the power of the DTOs is fluid and the boundaries of their operations change. Even the seven organizations that formerly dominated the landscape were only loosely geographically based. The conflict evolves as fighting between DTOs over drug plazas and corridors is exacerbated or resolved. Some DTOs have fragmented creating a proliferation of new groups, and this has generated more violence. But there is a debate if fragmentation represents a long-run weakening of the DTOs’ influence and making them more susceptible to state penetration.187 Fifth, while forecasting changes in the violence is speculative, many observers are concerned that high levels of violence may persist in the near term. The inputs from the United States that fuel the violence—high-powered guns and illicit profits—have not been significantly disrupted.188 According to the U.S. government, nearly 100,000 guns which were seized by Mexican authorities between 2007 through 2011 have been turned over to the U.S. Department of Justice’s Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) for tracing. Of those, some 68,161 (68% of the total) were determined by the ATF to have come from the United States.189 There is a lively debate about how large the annual profits from drug trafficking actually are and what fraction flows back to Mexico from the United States. Estimates of Mexican organizations’ drug receipts vary among U.S. government agencies, ranging from $22 billion (U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration) to $19 billion to $29 billion (U.S. Department of Homeland Security) and an even broader range of $8 billion to $25 billion (U.S. State Department).190 187 Diana Villiers Negroponte, “Measuring Success in the Drug War: Criteria to Determine Progress in Mexico’s Efforts to Defeat Narco-traffickers,” Brookings Institution, October 19, 2010, at http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/ 2010/0525_mexico_drug_war_negroponte.aspx. 188 For background on the problem of gun trafficking, see CRS Report R40733, Gun Trafficking and the Southwest Border, by Vivian S. Chu and William J. Krouse. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) estimates between $19 to $29 billion generated by illicit drug sales in the United States flows back to Mexico each year. See DHS, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), United States-Mexico Criminal Proceeds Study, June 2010. Analysts have found it difficult to determine how much of these funds are transferred back to the Mexican DTOs through bulk cash flows and how much is laundered through other methods. Douglas Farah, “Money Laundering and Bulk Cash Smuggling: Challenges for the Mérida Initiative,” in Shared Responsibility: U.S.-Mexico Options for Confronting Organized Crime, ed. Eric L. Olson, David A. Shirk, and Andrew Selee (Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars and the University of San Diego, 2010). 189 Pete Yost, “ATF: 68,000 Guns in Mexico Traced to U.S.,” Washington Post, April 27, 2012. See also, Colby Goodman and Michael Marizco, U.S. Firearms Trafficking to Mexico: New Data and Insights Illuminate Key Trends and Challenges, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars Mexico Institute, Working Paper on U.S.-Mexico Security Cooperation, September 2010. Analysts contest how many firearms the Mexican government has seized and if the sample of those submitted for tracing to the ATF is representative. The Mexican government and many others have maintained that the increased availability of high-powered weapons, often originating from the United States, provides the tools for more violence. 190 Mollie Laffin-Rose, “‘Organized Crime Laundered $10 Bn in Mexico in FY2011,’” In Sight Crime: Organized (continued...) Congressional Research Service 38 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence Nongovernmental analysts have calculated considerably lower estimates. The Rand Corporation released a report in 2010 that estimated the amount of drug revenues flowing to Mexico’s DTOs annually at $6.6 billion.191 Independent scholar Alejandro Hope projects total export revenue for Mexico’s drug trafficking organizations between $4.7 billion to $8.1 billion, with $6.2 billion as the best estimate.192 In April 2012, Mexico’s Ministry of Finance released a study that estimated total proceeds from organized crime laundered in Mexico in 2011 at approximately $10 billion, with drug trafficking accounting for 41% of the laundered proceeds.193 Seizures of illicit funds derived from drug trafficking have been low. Some estimate that $20 billion to $25 billion annually in bulk cash flows back to Mexico and its Colombian suppliers from drug sales in the United States. According to a 2010 analysis by the Washington Post of data from the U.S. and Mexican governments, only about 1% of this cash was recovered despite unprecedented efforts to seize more.194 Regardless of the total, some analysts remain skeptical that clamping down on money laundering will be the magic bullet for reducing illicit trafficking in Mexico or its associated violence.195 They argue that other strategies are needed to tackle the problem. But U.S. and Mexican government officials assert that one of the most effective ways to dismantle the DTOs is to reduce the criminal proceeds that fund their operations.196 In March 2012, the Mexican Attorney General’s office created a Specialized Unit for Financial Analysis to increase the government’s capacity to prosecute financial crimes including money laundering. In the United States, bilateral cooperation on money laundering cases, including training for Mexican prosecutors, has increased.197 The United States and Mexico formed a Bilateral Money Laundering Working Group to coordinate the investigation and prosecution of money laundering and bulk cash smuggling.198 Sixth, cooperation between Mexico and the United States has markedly increased under the Mérida Initiative. The United States became more forthcoming in providing actionable intelligence to Mexican agencies during President Calderón’s tenure. Mexico showed an (...continued) Crime in the Americas, April 20, 2012. This article has links to all the U.S. government studies; see also footnote number 169. 191 Beau Kilmer, Jonathan P. Caulkins, and Brittany M. Bond et al., Drug Trafficking Revenues and Violence in Mexico: Would Legalizing Marijuana in California Help?, RAND Corporation, Los Angeles, CA, 2010. 192 Eric L. Olson, Considering New Strategies for Confronting Organized Crime in Mexico, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars: Mexico Institute, Washington, DC, March 2012. 193 Mollie Laffin-Rose, “‘Organized Crime Laundered $10 Bn in Mexico in FY2011,’” In Sight Crime: Organized Crime in the Americas, April 20, 2012. 194 William Booth and Nick Miroff, “Stepped-up Efforts by U.S., Mexico Fail to Stem Flow of Drug Money South,” Washington Post, August 25, 2010. 195 See for example, Alejandro Hope, “Money Laundering and the Myth of the Ninja Accountant,” In Sight Crime: Organized Crime in the Americas, October 11, 2011. 196 See, for example, testimony from Hearing before the U.S. Senate Caucus on International Narcotics Control, “Money Laundering and Bulk Cash Smuggling along the Southwest Border,” March 9, 2011. Anti-money laundering efforts including countering bulk cash smuggling are important elements of the National Southwest Border Counternarcotics Strategy available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/ondcp/policy-and-research/ swb_counternarcotics_strategy11.pdf. 197 Joseph Palazzo, “U.S. in New Drug-Money Push,” Wall Street Journal, September 30, 2010. 198 For more background, see CRS Report R41349, U.S.-Mexican Security Cooperation: The Mérida Initiative and Beyond , by Clare Ribando Seelke and Kristin M. Finklea. Congressional Research Service 39 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence increased willingness to base U.S. personnel in Mexico to provide operational support. Mexico also demonstrated an increased commitment to control its borders and announced an initiative in September 2010 to control money laundering and disrupt the flow of drug money.199 Since 2001, the United States has applied financial sanctions to all the major DTOs in Mexico or individuals heading those DTOs (as well as several smaller organizations) under the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act.200 Between 2008 and April 2011, the U.S. government designated 271 individuals and 135 entities tied to the financial and commercial networks of Mexico’s most wanted traffickers under the act.201 The brutal violence associated with drug trafficking in Mexico appears to exceed the violence that is intrinsic to narcotics trafficking and organized crime in general. The attack on civil society has been particularly harsh for local government officials and journalists. Beyond the reports of journalists, mayors, and young people being killed described earlier, there have been reports of innocent bystanders increasingly being caught in the violence. On August 25, 2011, 52 people lost their lives in a casino fire allegedly ignited by Los Zetas, the highest number of Mexican civilians killed in a single incident since the beginning of the government’s campaign against organized crime.202 President Calderón decried the incident as the work of “true terrorists.”203 Others have cited this incident as another example of organized crime’s involvement in corruption and extortion.204 The use of car bombs, simultaneous attacks in different cities, and a couple of incidents of seemingly indiscriminate attacks on civilians (including the aforementioned casino fire) have raised concerns that the DTOs may be using tactics similar to those of insurgent groups or terrorists.205 The DTOs, however, appear to lack a discernible political goal or ideology, which is one element of a widely recognized definition of terrorism. The U.S. State Department, in its Country Reports on Terrorism 2011, published in July 2012, maintains No known international terrorist organization had an operational presence in Mexico and no terrorist group targeted U.S. citizens in or from Mexican territory. There was no evidence of ties between Mexican criminal organizations and terrorist groups, nor that the criminal organizations had political or territorial control, aside from seeking to protect and expand the impunity with which they conduct their criminal activity.206 199 Embassy of Mexico, “Fact Sheet—National Strategy for Preventing and Fighting Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism,” September 2010. 200 The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) targets and blocks financial assets, subject to U.S. jurisdiction, of drug kingpins and related associates and entities. See CRS Report R41215, Latin America and the Caribbean: Illicit Drug Trafficking and U.S. Counterdrug Programs, coordinated by Clare Ribando Seelke. 201 Celina B. Realuyo, It’s All About the Money: Advancing Anti-Money Laundering Efforts in the U.S. and Mexico to Combat Transnational Organized Crime, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars: Mexico Institute, Washington, DC, May 2012. This report describes both U.S. and Mexican anti-money laundering efforts. 202 Tracy Wilkinson, “As Fury Builds in Mexico, 5 Arrested in Casino Fire,” Chicago Tribune, August 30, 2011. 203 Dudley Althaus, “Calderón: Casino Killers ‘Terrorists’,” Houston Chronicle, August 27, 2011. 204 “Corruption, not terrorism? Extortion now suspected in casino deaths,” Washington Post, September 1, 2011. 205 Mark A. R. Kleiman, Jonathan P. Caukins, and Angela Hawken, Drugs and Drug Policy: What Everyone Needs to Know (Oxford University Press, 2011); Jane’s Information Group, “Jane’s Sentinel Security Assessment—Central America and the Caribbean,” February 16, 2011. Of note, some Members of Congress introduced legislation in the 112th Congress, (H.R. 1270, H.R. 4303), that would have directed the U.S. Secretary of State to designate certain Mexican DTOs as foreign terrorist organizations. 206 U.S. Department of State, Country Reports on Terrorism 2011, July 31, 2012 at (continued...) Congressional Research Service 40 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence But the violence has affected the state of democracy in Mexico. For example, the human rights group Freedom House downgraded Mexico in its 2011 ranking as part of its annual evaluation of political rights and civil liberties worldwide. Freedom House ranks countries as free, partly free, or not free. In its Freedom in the World 2011 report, Mexico was downgraded from “free” in 2010 to “partly free” in 2011 because of a decline in its political rights rating “due to the targeting of local officials by organized crime groups and the government’s inability to protect citizens’ rights in the face of criminal violence.” For the foreseeable future, the Mexican government will have to deal with the DTOs and the violence that they generate. The DTOs are having a profound demoralizing and delegitimizing effect on local, state, and federal government in Mexico. It may take years of building stronger institutions before violence is markedly reduced. Notwithstanding the DTO violence, Mexico continues to have one of the lower homicide rates in the region, although the post-2006 escalation in drug trafficking-related deaths has pushed the national homicide rate significantly higher. From a nationwide homicide rate of 11 homicides per 100,000 in 2008, the national homicide rate rose to 14 per 100,000 in 2009.207 According to a U.N. global study on homicide published in 2011, Mexico’s homicide rate was 18 per 100,000 in 2010. The same study reporting national rates in the region for 2010 shows that Mexico’s overall homicide rate is far lower than those of Guatemala (41), El Salvador (66), and Honduras (82). In South America, Colombia, Brazil, and Venezuela’s national homicide rates also significantly exceeded Mexico’s in recent years.208 In 2007, organized crime deaths in Mexico were the cause of slightly less than 32% of all intentional homicides, but by 2010 and 2011 organized crime homicides accounted for more than half of all intentional homicides.209 According to a review by the Trans-Border Institute of tallies from independent media organizations between 45% to 60% of all intentional homicides in Mexico in 2012 “bore characteristics typical of organized crime groups.”210 To reduce the violence will require public support for the government’s policies. Thus far, the Mexican government’s efforts to markedly lower the violence have not shown results. Some observers criticized the Calderón government for adopting an aggressive approach (literally declaring war on the drug traffickers) without having a clear definition of success, without understanding the consequences of the policy, and without having the tools necessary to win.211 Elements of the government’s strategy in the Beyond Mérida program that are designed to reduce the violence, such as institutionalizing the rule of law, reforming the justice system, and completing economic and social development programs to combat crime, all have a long timeframe.212 It may take years or decades to build effective, efficient legal institutions in Mexico (...continued) http://www.state.gov/j/ct/rls/crt/2011/index.htm. 207 Economist Intelligence Unit, “Mexico Risk: Security Risk,” September 23, 2010. 208 United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Global Study on Homicide: Trends, Contexts, Data, 2011 at http://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/statistics/Homicide/Globa_study_on_homicide_2011_web.pdf. Rates have been rounded to present nearest whole number. 209 Molzahn, Rios, and Shirk, Drug Violence in Mexico: Data and Analysis Through 2011. 210 Molzahn, Rodriquez Ferreira, and Shirk, Drug Violence in Mexico: Data and Analysis Through 2012. 211 See, for example, Jorge G. Castaneda, “What’s Spanish for Quagmire?,” Foreign Policy, January/February 2010. 212 The United States and Mexico are recognizing that reduction in violence must be a key goal of the Beyond Mérida strategy. For more on the Beyond Mérida strategy, see CRS Report R41349, U.S.-Mexican Security Cooperation: The Mérida Initiative and Beyond. Congressional Research Service 41 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence that resist threats and bribery. Yet policy analysts believe these institutions are necessary before the DTOs can be reduced from a national security threat to a law and order problem.213 Some observers in Mexico are advocating anti-violence programs modeled on successful strategies used in other Latin American cities, such as Rio de Janeiro in Brazil, or from programs in the United States.214 Some analysts have called for a violence reduction strategy to be applied in the near term, while longer-term efforts to reform the police and justice system carry on simultaneously. Drug policy analyst Mark Kleiman and others have endorsed enforcement efforts that concentrate resources on the most violent organizations.215 Such a targeted strategy would sequentially focus on groups based on their violence levels or violence behaviors. It would put incentives in place for gangs to reduce their use of violence to avoid the designation of being most violent. This strategy has risks associated with it including that such a policy might appear to favor one or more groups by focusing the government’s efforts on a particular group (the most violent) or lead to greater disequilibrium among rival organizations.216 However, some observers maintain that Calderón’s non-selective or “undifferentiated” strategy stimulated drug war rivalries, invited succession battles, and produced a ratcheting up of the violence. A new development has been significantly increased sharing of intelligence at the federal level by the United States with Mexico, which reflects greater U.S. confidence in Mexican law enforcement capacity and integrity. This development again raises the possibility that identifying and targeting DTO leaders for apprehension and investigation and successfully removing them can work to lower the violence. However, if the long-established pattern of ineffectual attacks and prosecution of DTO leaders continues, the intense violence is likely to endure. If a near-term solution to lowering the violence is not adopted, some communities may take matters into their own hands and resort to vigilante justice, as some already have done quite noticeably in early 2013.217 As noted above, U.S.-Mexico security cooperation has increased significantly with the implementation of the Mérida Initiative, an administration program that Congress began funding in 2008. The newer Beyond Mérida strategy is increasingly focused on the challenges of bringing violence under control in Mexico. The increased use of intelligence-based security operations that 213 See, for example, Shannon K. O'Neil, Two Nations Indivisible: Mexico, the United Sates, and the Road Ahead (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2013), in the chapter “Mexico’s Rising Insecurity.” 214 Eduardo Guerrero Gutiérrez, “Cómo Reducir La Violencia en México,” Nexos en Línea,” November 3, 2010. Guerrero cites the Boston program “Operation Ceasefire” and the Tri-Agency Resource Gang Enforcement Team (TARGET) of Orange County, California, as two examples of effective programs to reduce violence by applying the principle of concentrating enforcement efforts and reducing violence through credibly communicating to violent offenders that they will be prosecuted. 215 Eric L. Olson, Considering New Strategies for Confronting Organized Crime in Mexico; Mark Kleiman, “Surgical Strikes in the Drug Wars: Smarter Policies for Both Sides of the Border,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 90, no. 5, September/October 2011. 216 Guillermo Vásquez del Mercado Almada, “Five Ps for a Violence Reduction Strategy in Mexico (Part III),” Small Wars Journal, March 9, 2012. The author also endorses a violence reduction strategy, but cautions against “sequential” targeting. He backs a strategy with the following tactics: “a) aim for simultaneous rather than sequential targets; b) contain violence; and c) conquer high intensity crime zones.” 217 Richard Fausset and Cecilia Sanchez, “Worry Grows over Mexico Vigilante Movement,” Los Angeles Times, April 11, 2013. For more background, see also Nick Miroff and William Booth, “In Mexico, a Legal Breakdown Invites Brutal Justice,” Washington Post, December 9, 2010; Vanda Felbab-Brown, Calderón’s Caldron: Lessons from Mexico’s Battle Against Organized Crime and Drug Trafficking in Tijuana, Ciudad Juárez, and Michoacán, The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC, September 2011. In the Brookings report, see section on “Mexico’s Militias.” Congressional Research Service 42 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence has led to taking down the top DTO leaders is now being expanded to disrupt the capacity of the entire organization—not just top leadership and their hired killers, but those in mid-level positions. According to one analyst, targeting the middle layer and removing those operatives if possible in a single sweep, can effectively hobble an organization because it makes it harder for the DTO to regenerate.218 The goal of the Mexican government’s counter-DTO strategy has been to reduce the extent and character of the DTOs’ activity from a national security threat to a law and order problem and to transfer responsibility from military forces back to the police. While the DTOs have used terrorist tactics, they do not use them to the degree or with the same intentions as did narco traffickers in Colombia.219 Mexico’s challenge remains largely an organized crime or mafia problem, and the most important tools for managing it include long-term institutional reform and the replacement of a culture of illegality with one of rule of law and legality. 218 Felbab-Brown, Peña Nieto’s Piñata: The Promise and Pitfalls of Mexico’s New Security Policy against Organized Crime. According to the author, taking out the middle layer “can also limit warfare among the DTOs since a DTO that has lost the middle layer has less capacity to resist a takeover.” 219 Ken Ellingwood, “Is Mexico a New Colombia? Mexicans May Have Cause to Bristle at U.S. Comparison,” Chicago Tribune, September 26, 2010. Also see Appendix. Congressional Research Service 43 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence Appendix. Comparing Mexico and Colombia In remarks before the Council of Foreign Relations in September 2010, then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton compared the upsurge in violence in Mexico to the situation in Colombia 20 years ago.220 The comparison to Colombia was quickly disavowed by the Mexican government (and reportedly by President Obama), but broadened the debate about the seriousness of the threat posed to Mexico’s national security and democracy. Some analysts employ the Colombia comparison to argue that the successes of Plan Colombia221 offer appropriate prescriptions for Mexico. Other observers counter that Colombia two decades ago faced a very different challenge than Mexico faces today. The government of Colombia confronted an insurgency of armed guerrillas who were attempting to overthrow the Colombian government, while simultaneously facing a campaign of violence by its drug trafficking organizations. The Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) and other armed groups in the country had the goal of replacing the Colombian state, which is significantly different from the goal of the DTOs of Mexico, which want impunity to traffic drugs and engage in other illicit activities for profit. While the FARC and other insurgents turned to drug trafficking to help finance their cause, their goal was to overthrow the sovereign state. At the height of their power, the FARC and other insurgents controlled more than a third of the country’s municipalities.222 The degree to which some of Mexico’s municipalities are influenced by the DTOs is hard to determine. In Mexico, the goal of the traffickers is to corrupt the police and government at all levels to allow them to pursue illicit profits, but it is not to take control of the apparatus of the state. Thus, it remains a problem of criminality rather than a battle with insurgents or terrorists. On the other hand, because some of the characteristics of the violence in Mexico—political assassinations, car bombs, extreme violence, and the increased killing of innocent bystanders— are similar to the tactics of political insurgents, some analysts have asserted that the violence goes beyond conventional organized crime behavior. These observers maintain that the violence is highly organized and exceptionally brutal, and therefore it is qualitatively different from criminal violence.223 Some policy analysts have described the Mexican criminal organizations as a “criminal insurgency.”224 John P. Sullivan at the Center for Advanced Studies in Terrorism describes how the response to the government’s enforcement crackdown led to the evolution of the conflict and violence: “In Mexico, when faced with a crackdown, the cartels chose to battle 220 “A Conversation with U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton,” Council on Foreign Relations, September 8, 2010. Transcript available at http://www.cfr.org/publication/22896/ conversation_with_us_secretary_of_state_hillary_rodham_clinton.html. 221 Plan Colombia is a U.S.-supported counterdrug and counterterrorism program that has operated for more than a decade in Colombia. For more background, see CRS Report RL32250, Colombia: Background, U.S. Relations, and Congressional Interest, by June S. Beittel. 222 U.S. General Accounting Office, Drug Control: Challenges in Implementing Plan Colombia, Statement of Jess T. Ford, Director, International Affairs and Trade, GAO-01-76T, October 12, 2000. 223 For example, there have been near simultaneous actions against Mexico’s military or police forces, coordinated attacks on different cities, cartel roadblocks throughout cities like Monterrey to prevent responders from reaching firefights or other hot spots, and kidnappings by cartel forces dressed in Mexican police or military uniforms or in close simulations of the official uniforms. 224 For other analysts using the terminology of “criminal insurgency” see Bob Killebrew and Jennifer Bernal, Crime Wars: Gangs, Cartels and U.S. National Security, Center for a New American Security, September 2010. Congressional Research Service 44 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence each other and the government to maintain a stake in the game. A high level of violence, impunity, and a criminal insurgency were thus an unintended side effect.”225 From another perspective, Professor Phil Williams argues that the violence is that of traditional organized crime, but taken to new depths or levels of intensity. He suggests that the Mexican drug trafficking-related violence grows out of a “perfect storm” of conditions. The situation in Mexico has precedents and parallels with the growth of criminal organizations in Italy, Russia, Albania, and elsewhere. In addition, there is a feature of “anomie” to Mexico’s violence—the homicidal violence has become a feature of everyday life leading to “a degeneration of rules and norms and the emergence of forms of behavior unconstrained by standard notions of what is acceptable.”226 The Mexican DTOs appear to have no ideology other than a ruthless pursuit of profit, but their corrupting influence and intimidation have challenged the state’s monopoly on the use of force and rule of law. In Mexico, the police and court system, historically weak and undercut by corruption, appear not equipped, organized, or managed to combat the drug organizations. Most arrests are never prosecuted. For example, the large numbers of arrests during the Calderón administration infrequently led to successful prosecutions. The rate of impunity (non prosecution) for murder in Mexico is 81% and higher for other types of crime.227 The violent response of the DTOs to the Calderón government’s antidrug campaign, similar to what was seen in smaller municipalities throughout Colombia, has intimidated local, state, and federal authorities. DTO profits, like those made by local FARC commanders in Colombia, are shared with government officials at all levels. Unlike the Colombian FARC, the Mexican traffickers do not seek to replace the government and provide services, but they are committed to manipulating it with bribery and violence to continue their illegal activities without interference. Some observers argue that parts of the Mexican state have been “captured” similar to the control insurgents once had over large parts of Colombia. These analysts maintain that some states or localities in Mexico are under DTO control.228 For example, in Michoacán, the LFM organization controlled many local businesses through extortion (taxing businesses or charging them for security services). According to one estimate made in 2010, approximately 85% of legitimate businesses in Michoacán had some type of relationship with the LFM.229 Another study concerning DTO presence in Mexican local governments was released in late August 2010. That study, entitled “Municipal Government and Organized Crime,” prepared for a committee of the Mexican Senate, reportedly found that 195 Mexican municipalities (8% of the total) were completely under control of organized crime, while another 1,536 (63% of the total) were “infiltrated” by organized crime. The study concluded that a majority of Mexican municipalities had organized crime elements capable of controlling the illicit businesses of retail drug trafficking, cultivation and trafficking of drugs, kidnapping, and extortion.230 The study found that 225 John P. Sullivan, “Counter-supply and Counter-violence Approaches to Narcotics Trafficking,” Small Wars & Insurgencies, vol. 21, no. 1 (March 12, 2010), p. 186. 226 Williams, “El Crimen Organizada y la Violencia en Mexico.” 227 Mexico Evalúa, Seguridad y Justicia Penal en los Estados: 25 Indicadores de Nuestra Debilidad Institucional, March 2012. 228 For example, see William Finnegan, “Silver or Lead,” The New Yorker, May 31, 2010. 229 Ibid. 230 “Measuring the Extent of Drug Cartel Control in Mexico,” LatinNews Daily, September 15, 2010. Ricardo Ravelo, “Los Cárteles Imponen Su Ley,” Proceso, October 24, 2010. Congressional Research Service 45 Mexico’s Drug Trafficking Organizations: Source and Scope of the Violence criminal structures operate with logistical support from corrupt municipal police and politicians.231 Some analysts contend that Colombia’s experience provides valuable lessons for Mexico.232 The increasing training provided by Colombian security forces to Mexico’s army and police in recent years demonstrates that there are operational lessons that Mexican authorities value.233 Others maintain that Mexico’s situation is distinctly complex, which limits the relevance of Colombia as a model. Clearly, there are many lessons learned from studying the U.S. supported successes and failures in Colombia, but their application to Mexico are limited by the countries’ very different histories and circumstances. Author Contact Information June S. Beittel Analyst in Latin American Affairs jbeittel@crs.loc.gov, 7-7613 231 Ibid. For example, Robert C. Bonner, “The New Cocaine Cowboys,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 89 (July/August 2010). Bonner looks to an earlier era for lessons from Colombia, but asserts that “Virtually all the key lessons learned from the defeat of the Colombian cartels in the 1990s are applicable to the current battle against the Mexican cartels.” 233 Juan Forero, “Colombia Stepping Up Anti-Drug Training of Mexico’s Army, Police,” Washington Post, January 22, 2011. 232 Congressional Research Service 46 the typical standards of organized crime.4 Yet, Mexico's homicide rate is not exceptional in the region, where many states are plagued by violent crime.

President Calderón made an aggressive campaign against crime groups, especially the large drug trafficking organizations (DTOs), the central focus of his Administration's policy. He sent several thousand Mexican military troops and federal police to combat the organizations in drug trafficking "hot spots" around the country. His government made some dramatic and well-publicized arrests, but few of those captured "kingpins" were effectively prosecuted. Between 2007 and 2012, as part of much closer U.S.-Mexico security cooperation, the Mexican government significantly increased extraditions to the United States, with majority of the suspects wanted by the U.S. government on drug trafficking and related charges. The number of extraditions peaked in 2012 and has declined since President Peña Nieto took office. The confrontation with organized crime also produced a violent reaction by the trafficking organizations, and violence soared through 2011. (According to the estimates of the Justice in Mexico project, approximately 16,400 organized crime-related homicides took place in 2011). Another result of this "militarized" strategy was an increase in accusations of human rights violations against the Mexican military, which was largely untrained in domestic policing.

When President Peña Nieto took office in December 2012, he had indicated he would take a new direction in his security policy: more focused on reducing criminal violence that affects civilians and businesses and less oriented toward removing the leadership of the large DTOs. His then-attorney general, Jesus Murillo Karam, said in 2012 that Mexico faced challenges from some 60 to 80 crime groups operating in the country whose proliferation he attributed to the kingpin strategy of the Calderón government.5 Despite the commitment to shift the focus of the government's strategy, several analysts have noted a significant continuity with Calderón's security approach.6 The Peña Nieto government has continued the military and federal police deployments to combat the DTOs, but recentralized control over security in Mexico's interior ministry.

President Peña Nieto streamlined cooperation with the United States under the Merida Initiative that began during President Calderón's term. The Mérida Initiative, a bilateral anti-crime assistance package launched in 2008, initially focused on providing Mexico with hardware, such as planes, scanners, and other equipment, to combat the DTOs. The $2.4 billion effort (through 2014) shifted in recent years to focus on police and judicial reform, including training at the local and state level, and preventative policies. Thus far, about $1.5 billion of the Mérida Initiative funding has been delivered.7 After some reorganization of cooperation efforts, the Peña Nieto government continued the Mérida programs.

In 2014, the Peña Nieto Administration implemented another security strategy element promised during his presidential campaign: standing up a national militarized police force or gendarmarie. The scope of the force implemented in August 2014 was significantly scaled back from its original proposed size of 40,000. About 5,000 officers were added to the federal police force (around 36,000 in size) with a mission of protecting citizens from crime and shielding their economic and industrial activities from harm, such as defending vital petroleum infrastructure in northeast Mexico. Several observers maintain that the distinct purpose of the gendarmerie has not been clarified nor followed. Gendarmerie deployments in such hot spots such as Michoacán and Iguala, Guerrero—where 43 teaching trainees disappeared in September 2014—have not, according to some observers, followed their mandate closely.8

Congressional Concerns

Mexico's stability is of critical importance to the United States, and the nature and the intensity of the violence has been of particular concern to the U.S. Congress. Mexico shares a nearly 2,000-mile border with the United States and has close trade and demographic ties. In addition to U.S. concern about this strategic partner and close neighbor, policymakers have been concerned that the violence in Mexico could "spill over" into U.S. border states (or further inland) despite beefed up security measures. According to the 2011 National Drug Threat Assessment prepared by the U.S. Department of Justice, the potential harm from Mexico's criminal groups is formidable. Mexican DTOs, according to the 2011 report, "dominate the supply and wholesale distribution of most illicit drugs in the United States" and are present in more than 1,000 U.S. cities.9

From the 111th through the 113th Congresses, Members convened numerous hearings dealing with the violence in Mexico, U.S. foreign assistance, and border security issues. Congressional concern heightened after U.S. consulate staff and security personnel working in Mexico came under attack, and some were killed.10 Following a July 2010 car bombing allegedly set by a drug trafficking organization in Ciudad Juárez, Chihuahua (killing four), additional car bombs attributed to the DTOs have been exploded in border states and elsewhere. Occasional use of car bombs, grenades, and rocket-propelled grenade launchers—such as the one used to bring down a Mexican army helicopter in May 2015, killing seven soldiers—continue to raise concern that some Mexican drug traffickers may be adopting insurgent or terrorist techniques. Some observers have warned that novel technologies have been used to adapt weaponry, ranging from armored "narco trucks" to untraceable self-assembled high powered rifles.11

Congress has expressed its concern over the violence in Mexico by enacting resolutions and considering legislation. The 114th Congress continues to assess how the Peña Nieto government in tandem with the U.S. government are addressing the illicit drug trade, heightened related violence in Mexico, and the effect of drug trafficking and violence on U.S.-Mexico security. In June 2015, for example, a bipartisan letter of concern asked Secretary of State John Kerry to examine criminal violence in Mexico as a threat to U.S. personnel working in Mexican consulates.12 A provision of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2016 under consideration in July 2015 would require the U.S. Secretary of Defense to report on violence and cartel activity in Mexico as it affects U.S. national security.13

Figure 1. Map of Mexico

Source: CRS.

Crime Situation in Mexico

The splintering of the large DTOs into competing factions and gangs of different sizes took place over several years. The development of these different crime groups, ranging in scope from transnational criminal organizations to small local mafias with certain trafficking or other crime specialties, has made the crime situation even more diffuse and their criminal behavior harder to eradicate, according to some analysts. The large organizations or DTOs that tended to be hierarchical, often bound by familial ties, and led by hard-to-capture cartel kingpins, have been replaced by flatter and more nimble organizations that tend to be loosely networked. Far more common in the present crime group formation is the outsourcing of certain aspects of trafficking. The myriad of smaller organizations resist the imposition of norms to limit violence. The growth of rivalries among a greater number of organized crime "players" has produced continued violence; albeit in some cases "less able to threaten the state and less endowed with impunity."14 However, even the larger organizations (Sinaloa, for example) that have adopted a cellular structure may still try to protect their leadership as in the recent orchestrated escape of the world's most wanted drug kingpin, El Chapo Guzmán.

The scope of the violence generated by Mexican crime groups has been difficult to measure due to restricted reporting by the government and attempts by crime groups to mislead the public. The criminal actors either publicize their crimes in garish displays intended to intimidate their rivals, the public, or security forces. They may also attempt to attribute their crimes to other actors, such as a competing cartel, or they cover up the homicides they commit. For example, some shootouts are simply not reported as a result of media self-censorship or because the bodies disappear.15 Forced disappearances in Mexico have become a growing concern, and there has been only a limited effort to tabulate an accurate count of the missing or disappeared, a problem that is exacerbated by underreporting. Although the Peña Nieto Administration has worked on this issue for a couple of years, widely varying estimates continue to be released by the government. In late 2014, for instance, the government reported approximately 23,605 cases of disappearances, of which 40% took place during the Peña Nieto Administration. However, in the case of the missing students in Iguala, Guerrero, the police and investigators searching for the students' remains found scores of unmarked mass graves containing bodies that had previously not been counted.16

Background on Drug Trafficking in Mexico

Drug trafficking organizations have operated in Mexico for more than a century. The DTOs can be described as global businesses with forward and backward linkages for managing supply and distribution in many countries. As businesses, they are concerned with bringing their product to market in the most efficient way in order to maximize their profits. The Mexican DTOs are the major wholesalers of illegal drugs in the United States and are increasingly gaining control of U.S. retail-level distribution through alliances with U.S. gangs. Their operations, however, are markedly less violent in the United States than in Mexico, despite their reported presence in multiple U.S. jurisdictions.17 The DTOs use the tools of bribery and violence, which are complementary. Violence is used to discipline employees, enforce transactions, limit the entry of competitors, and coerce. Bribery and corruption help neutralize government action against the DTOs, ensure impunity, and facilitate smooth operations.

Issues with Corruption in Law Enforcement

In June 2012, federal police officers shot and killed three of their colleagues at Mexico City's international airport, reportedly at the bidding of a DTO. In August 2012, following the ambush of two U.S. law enforcement officers and a colleague from the Mexican navy, 12 Mexican Federal Police officers were arrested and charged with attempted murder.18 More recently, in the incident in Iguala, Guerrero, involving the disappearance and probable murder of 43 college students in September 2014, allegedly carried out by a local police force that turned the students over to a Mexican crime group, Guerreros Unidos, working in collaboration with a corrupt local mayor and his wife.19

Arrests of police and other public officials accused of cooperating with the DTOs have rarely been followed by convictions, although some prominent cases involving official corruption have achieved results. Mexico's military, especially the army, have been accused of torture and extrajudicial killings in their internal security activities, such as the massacre in July 2014 of some 22 people in Tlatlaya, Mexico, resulting in the arrest of several soldiers and an army lieutenant. In January 2015, the government reported that more than 90 people were detained and charged for their alleged involvement in the Iguala student disappearances case that took place several months earlier.20 In May 2015, Iguala's deputy police chief was arrested and identified as a mastermind of the decision to turn the students over to the drug cartel.21

In the recent prison escape of El Chapo Guzmán in 2015, scores of Mexican prison personnel in the maximum security Altiplano prison have been scrutinized as likely collaborators. Several analysts suggested that Guzmán may have received assistance from the highest levels of the government and from within the prison hierarchy. In a public appearance shortly after the prison break, Mexico's Minister of Interior Miguel Angel Osorio Chong announced that prison officials had to have been involved and that Antiplano's warden had been fired.22

The proceeds of drug sales (either laundered or as cash smuggled back to Mexico) are used in part to corrupt U.S. and Mexican border officials,23 Mexican law enforcement, security forces, and public officials to either ignore DTO activities or to actively support and protect them. Mexican DTOs advance their operations through widespread corruption; when corruption fails to achieve cooperation and acquiescence, violence is the ready alternative.

Police corruption has been so extensive that law enforcement officials corrupted or infiltrated by the DTOs and other criminal groups sometimes carry out their violent assignments. Purges of Mexico's municipal, state, and federal police have not contained the problem. Mexico's federal police, which grew from a force of 6,500 to 37,000 under the Calderón government and received training from the Mérida Initiative, were implicated in two incidents in 2012 (see text box).

The relationship of Mexico's drug traffickers to the government and to one another is now a rapidly evolving picture and any current snapshot (such as the one provided in this report) must be continually adjusted. In the early 20th century, Mexico was a source of marijuana and heroin to the United States, and by the 1940s, Mexican drug smugglers were notorious in the United States. The growth and entrenchment of Mexico's drug trafficking networks occurred during a period of one-party rule in Mexico by the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI), which governed for 71 years. During that period, the government was centralized and hierarchical, and, to a large degree, it tolerated and protected some drug production and trafficking in certain regions of the country, even though the PRI government did not generally tolerate crime.24 According to numerous accounts, for many years the Mexican government pursued an overall policy of accommodation. Under this system, arrests and eradication of drug crops took place, but due to the effects of widespread corruption the system was "characterized by a working relationship between Mexican authorities and drug lords" through the 1990s.25

The stability of the system began to fray in the 1990s as Mexican political power decentralized and the push toward democratic pluralism began first at the local level and then nationally with the election of the National Action Party (PAN) candidate, Vicente Fox, as president in 2000.26 The process of democratization upended the equilibrium that had developed between state actors (such as the Federal Security Directorate that oversaw domestic security from 1947 to 1985) and organized crime. No longer were certain officials able to ensure the impunity of drug traffickers to the same degree and to regulate competition among Mexican DTOs for drug trafficking routes, or plazas. To a large extent, DTO violence directed at the government appears to be an attempt to reestablish impunity, while the inter-cartel violence seems to be attempts to reestablish dominance over specific drug trafficking plazas. The intra-DTO violence (or violence inside the organizations) reflects reaction to suspected betrayals and the competition to succeed killed or arrested leaders.

Before this political development, an important transition in the role of Mexico in the international drug trade took place during the 1980s and early 1990s. As Colombian DTOs were forcibly broken up, the highly profitable traffic in cocaine to the United States was gradually taken over by Mexican traffickers. The traditional trafficking route used by the Colombians through the Caribbean was shut down by intense enforcement efforts of the U.S. government. As Colombian DTOs lost this route, they increasingly subcontracted the trafficking of cocaine produced in the Andean region to the Mexican DTOs, whom they paid in cocaine rather than cash. These already strong organizations gradually took over the cocaine trafficking business, evolving from being mere couriers for the Colombians to being the wholesalers they are today. As Mexico's drug trafficking organizations rose to dominate the U.S. drug markets in the 1990s, the business became even more lucrative. This "raised the stakes," which encouraged the use of violence in Mexico to protect and promote market share. The violent struggle between DTOs over strategic routes and warehouses where drugs are consolidated before entering the United States reflects these higher stakes.

Today the major Mexican DTOs are polydrug, handling more than one type of drug, although they may specialize in the production or trafficking of specific products. Mexico is a major producer and supplier to the U.S. market of heroin, methamphetamine, and marijuana and the principal transit country for cocaine sold in the United States.27 The west coast state of Sinaloa (see Figure 1), which has a long coastline and difficult-to-access areas favorable for drug cultivation, is the heartland of Mexico's drug trade. Marijuana and poppy cultivation has flourished in this state for decades.28 It has been the source of Mexico's most notorious and successful drug traffickers.

According to the U.S State Department's 2015 International Narcotics Control Strategy Report (INCSR), Mexico is a major producer of heroin, marijuana, and methamphetamine destined for the United States. It is also the main trafficking route for South American cocaine that is U.S.-bound from the major supply countries of Peru, Colombia, and Bolivia. Coca bush cultivation and cocaine production in Colombia—the country that supplies 95% of the cocaine to the U.S. market—has declined, and there has been an increasing flow of Colombian cocaine (sometimes via Mexico) to other regions such as West Africa, Europe, and Asia. The Mexican government eradicates both opium poppy (from which heroin is derived) and cannabis and increased its eradication of both plant-based drugs in 2014. With regard to synthetic drugs, Mexican seizures of methamphetamine jumped by almost 36% between 2013 and 2014 to 19.8 metric tons. According to the 2015 INCSR, Mexican authorities seized 143 meth laboratories in 2014, up more than 11% from 2013.29

Evolution of Mexico's Major Drug Trafficking Organizations

The DTOs have been in constant flux in recent years.30 By some accounts, when President Calderón came to office in December 2006, there were four dominant DTOs: the Tijuana/Arellano Felix organization (AFO), the Sinaloa cartel, the Juárez/Vicente Carillo Fuentes organization (CFO), and the Gulf cartel.

Since then, the more stable large organizations that existed in the earlier years of the Calderón Administration have fractured into many more groups. For several years, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) identified the following organizations as dominant: Sinaloa, Los Zetas, Tijuana/AFO, Juárez/CFO, Beltrán Leyva, Gulf, and La Familia Michoacana. In some sense these might be viewed as the "traditional" DTOs. However, many analysts suggest that those 7 seem to have now fragmented to between 9 and as many as 20 major organizations. Today, fragmentation or "balkanization" of the major crime groups has been accompanied by diversification by many of the groups into other types of criminal activity. The following will focus on nine DTOs whose current status illuminates the great fluidity of all the DTOs in Mexico as they face new challenges from competition and changing market dynamics.

Nine Major DTOs

Reconfiguration of the major DTOs—often called transnational criminal organizations or TCOs due to their diversification into other criminal businesses—preceded the fragmentation that is so rampant today. The Gulf cartel, based in northeastern Mexico, had a long history of dominance in terms of power and profits, with the zenith of its power in the early 2000s. However, the Gulf cartel's enforcers—Los Zetas, who were organized from highly-trained Mexican military deserters—split to form a separate DTO and turned against their former employers, engaging in a hyper-violent competition for territory.

The well-established Sinaloa DTO, with roots in western Mexico, has fought brutally for increased control of routes through the border states of Chihuahua and Baja California with the goal of becoming the dominant DTO in the country. Sinaloa has a more decentralized structure of loosely linked smaller organizations, which has been susceptible to conflict when units break away. Nevertheless, the decentralized structure has enabled it to be quite adaptable in the highly competitive and unstable environment that now prevails.31

Sinaloa survived the arrest of billionaire and founder Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzmán in February 2014. The federal operation to capture and detain Guzmán, which gained support from U.S. intelligence, was viewed as a major victory for the Peña Nieto government. Somewhat surprisingly, the legendary kingpin's arrest did not spawn a visible power struggle within the cartel's hierarchy or an increase in violence, as some analysts had anticipated. His escape in July 2015 has generated speculation about his plans for the future and if he will retire from his former role at the head of the Sinaloa organization and disappear as did Rafael Caro Quintero, another significant trafficker, after his premature release in 2013.32 On the other hand, he may resume his former role at the head of Sinaloa. Both outcomes presume that he will not be caught in a few weeks and that his second escape from a Mexican prison turns out to be as successful as his first in 2001, which led to 13 years operating as a fugitive.

Finally, La Familia Michoacana—a DTO once based in the Pacific southwestern state of Michoacán and influential in surrounding states—split apart in early 2011. It eventually declined in importance as its successor, the Knights Templar, grew in prominence in the region known as the "tierra caliente" of Michoácan, Guerrero, and parts of neighboring states Colima and Jalisco (see map). A split off from Sinaloa, the Cartel Jalisco-New Generation (CJNG), also rose to prominence in the tierra caliente region between 2013 and 2015 and is now deemed by many analysts as a major Mexican cartel in the new criminal landscape. CJNG has increased in power with the decline of its enemy, the Knights Templar, targeted by the Mexican government in 2014. CJNG has reportedly expanded its influence to some nine Mexican states in 2015.33

From open-source research, there is more available information about the seven "traditional" DTOs (and their successors mentioned above). Current information about the array of new regional and local crime groups, numbering more than 45 groups, is more difficult to assess. The once-coherent organizations and their successors are still operating, both in conflict with one another and at times working in collaboration. A brief sketch of each of these nine major organizations, some of which are portrayed in the DEA Map in Figure 2, follows.

Figure 2. Map of DTO Areas of Dominant Influence by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration

Source: DEA, April 2015.

Notes: DEA uses the term "cartel" in place of DTO. Also, the DTO identified as the Knights Templar in the text of the report is labeled in the map key by its Spanish name, "Los Caballeros Templarios."

Tijuana/Arellano Felix Organization (AFO)

The AFO is a regional "tollgate" organization that has historically controlled the drug smuggling route between Baja California (Mexico) to southern California.34 It is based in the border city of Tijuana. One of the founders of modern Mexican DTOs, Miguel Angel Felix Gallardo, a former police officer from Sinaloa, created a network that included the Arellano Felix family and numerous other DTO leaders (such as Rafael Caro Quintero, Amado Carrillo Fuentes, and Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzman). The seven "Arellano Felix" brothers and four sisters inherited the AFO from their uncle, Miguel Angel Felix Gallardo, after his arrest in 1989 for the murder of DEA Special Agent Enrique "Kiki" Camarena.35

The AFO was once one of the two dominating DTOs in Mexico, infamous for brutally controlling the drug trade in Tijuana in the 1990s and early 2000s.36 The other was the Juárez DTO, also known as the Carrillo Fuentes Organization. The Mexican government and U.S. authorities took vigorous enforcement action against the AFO in the early years of the 2000s, with the arrests and killings of the five brothers involved in the drug trade—the last of whom was captured in Tijuana in 2008.

In 2008, Tijuana became one of the most violent cities in Mexico. That year, the AFO split into two competing factions when Eduardo Teodoro "El Teo" Garcia Simental, an AFO lieutenant, broke from Fernando "El Ingeniero" Sanchez Arellano (the nephew of the Arellano Felix brothers who had taken over the management of the DTO). Garcia Simental formed another faction of the AFO, reportedly allied with the Sinaloa DTO.37 Further contributing to the escalation in violence, other DTOs sought to gain control of the profitable Tijuana/Baja California-San Diego/California plaza in the wake of the power vacuum left by the earlier arrests of the AFO's key players.

The 2010 arrest of Garcia Simental sharply reduced levels of violence in Tijuana, which have remained relatively low since. Some assert that the arrest created a vacuum for the Sinaloa DTO to gain control of the Tijuana/San Diego smuggling corridor.38 Despite its weakened state, the AFO appears to have maintained control of the plaza through an agreement made between Sanchez Arellano and the Sinaloa DTO's leadership, in which Sinaloa and other trafficking groups pay a fee to use the plaza.39 Other observers have lauded the relative peace in Tijuana as a law enforcement success, but it is unclear how large of a role policing strategy has played in reducing violence.

According to an interview given by a DEA agent in 2013, U.S. authorities were more concerned about the rising presence of the Sinaloa DTO in the area than the AFO, citing that "the Sinaloa cartel has the upper hand," despite DEA's designation of Sanchez Arellano as one of the six most influential traffickers in the region.40 Sanchez Arellano appears to have led the DTO until his arrest in June 2014 by Mexican federal police. Sanchez Arellano's mother, Enedina Arellano Felix, who is trained as an accountant, has reportedly taken charge following her son's arrest. Some observers maintain that Enedina Arellano Felix's background as chief financial officer for the DTO may signal a shift toward favoring alliances and financial crimes over brutal violence.41 Now called a "shadow of its former self,"42 it is unclear if the AFO retains enough power through its own trafficking and other crimes to successfully operate as a tollbooth organization, or is simply a "puppet" organization under the control of the still-dominant Sinaloa DTO.

Sinaloa DTO

Sinaloa, composed of a network of smaller organizations, has grown to be the dominant DTO operating in Mexico today, controlling by some estimates from 40% to 60% of the country's drug trade.43 Some estimates place Sinaloa's annual earnings at around $3 billion.44 Sinaloa reportedly has a substantial presence in some 50 countries, including throughout the Americas, Europe, West Africa, and Southeast Asia. The Sinaloa DTO controls crime in at least five Mexican states: Baja California, Sonora and the "Golden Triangle" of Sinaloa, Durango, and Chihuahua, although analysts have disputed its current reach within Mexico.45

Often described as the most powerful mafia organization in the Western Hemisphere, Sinaloa is also reported to be the most cohesive.46 The Sinaloa DTO is known for trafficking cocaine, but moves all types of illicit drugs, including but not limited to heroin, methamphetamine, synthetic drugs, and marijuana, and has reached all regions of the United States, according to the U.S. Department of Justice.47

The Sinaloa DTO retains the Sinaloa core that descended from the Felix Gallardo network. Early in 2008, a federation dominated by the Sinaloa cartel (which included the Beltrán Leyva organization and the Juárez DTO) broke apart. In 2011, Sinaloa expanded operations into Mexico City and into Durango, Guerrero, and Michoacán states, while continuing its push into territories in both Baja California and Chihuahua once controlled by the Tijuana and Juárez DTOs. The Sinaloa DTO has a reputation for organizational prowess and eclectic strategies for eluding authorities. The organization has utilized tunnels, catapults, submarines, go-fast boats and semi-submersibles. These innovative techniques have supplemented more traditional methods, such as air transport and container ships, to traffic narcotics coming from South America or produced in Mexico into the United States.48

The Sinaloa DTO suffered significant blows to its top leadership in the first half of 2014. The February 2014 arrest of Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán, the cartel's storied leader and the most wanted criminal in Mexico, by Mexican marines in the tourist city of Mazatlán was seen as an important symbolic victory for the Peña Nieto Administration. The arrest of Guzmán diminished criticism that the Peña Nieto government had been too soft on DTO leaders, and it also demonstrated ongoing support from U.S. intelligence in the capture of top traffickers. Some authorities expressed fear of increased violence by rival organizations, such as the Knights Templar and Los Zetas, should the DTOs attempt to take advantage of Sinaloa's perceived weakness following Guzmán's capture.49 Others disagreed and thought activities would proceed as "business as usual" both in Sinaloa's areas of influence and inside the DTO, asserting that a very clear line of succession had already been put in place.50

Despite predictions to the contrary, the DTO appeared to weather the arrest of Guzmán without the spike in internal violence that is often associated with arrests of other DTO kingpins.51 While Sinaloa seems to have retained its internal cohesion, Mexican media sources reported that the level of organized-crime related homicides in Sinaloa state did slightly increase after Guzmán's arrest. With the rumored death in June 2014 of Juan Jose "El Azul" Esparragoza Moreno, one of Guzman's most trusted deputies, the head of the Sinaloa DTO was assumed to be Guzmán's partner, Ismael Zambada Garcia, alias "El Mayo."52

Guzmán, Esparragoza, and Zambada Garcia appear to have been the cartel's key leaders; however Sinaloa may operate with a more horizontal leadership structure than previously thought.53 Sinaloa operatives control certain territories, making up a decentralized network of bosses who conduct business and violence through alliances with each other and local gangs. Local gangs throughout the region specialize in specific operations and are then contracted by the Sinaloa DTO network.54

The unconfirmed death of "El Azul" Esparragoza in June 2014 reportedly weakened the DTO,55 but analysts maintain that Sinaloa continues to operate as a hegemon in the region. In July 2015, speculation about the extent of Sinaloa's dominance both internationally and its infiltration of the upper reaches of the Mexican government exploded anew following the successful escape by Guzmán through a mile-long tunnel from Mexico's top security prison located west of Mexico City. Sinaloa remains one of the few criminal groups in Mexico that has not diversified extensively into "extractive" crimes, such as kidnapping and extortion.56 It keeps a low profile to limit its exposure to relentless enforcement and has sustained a majority stake in the drug business rather than diversifying its empire. On the other hand, some observers suggest the leadership of the DTO has the resources to underwrite its impunity with bribes and corruption.57 Other observers have suggested that strengthening Sinaloa's hand to organize the DTOs and calm wider DTO violence may even have been seen as desirable.58 Still others raise the concern that Guzmán's prison break could spawn more violence, possibly along the U.S.-Mexico border.59

Juárez/Carrillo Fuentes Organization

Based in the border city of Ciudad Juárez in the state of Chihuahua, the once-powerful Juárez DTO controlled the smuggling corridor between Ciudad Juárez and El Paso, Texas, in the 1980s and 1990s.60 By some accounts, the Juárez DTO controlled at least half of all Mexican narcotics trafficking under the leadership of its founder, Amado Carrillo Fuentes. Vicente Carrillo Fuentes, Amado's brother, took over the leadership of the cartel when Amado died during plastic surgery in 1997 and reportedly led the Juárez organization until his arrest in October 2014.

In 2008, the Juárez DTO broke from the Sinaloa federation, with which it had been allied since 2002.61 The ensuing rivalry between the Juárez DTO and the Sinaloa DTO helped turn Ciudad Juárez into one of the most violent cities in the world. From 2008 to 2011, the Sinaloa DTO and the Juárez DTO fought a vicious "turf war," and Ciudad Juárez experienced a wave of violence with spikes in violent homicides, extortion, kidnapping, and theft—at one point reportedly experiencing 10 murders a day.62 From 2008 to 2012, the violence in Juárez cost about 10,000 lives. Reportedly, more than 15% of the population displaced by drug-related violence inside Mexico between 2006 to 2010 came from the border city, while having only slightly more than 1% of Mexico's population.63

In mid-2011, the "New Juárez Cartel" (Nuevo Cártel de Juárez) announced its presence in the city by posting a series of banners threatening the police chief.64 Despite the emergence of the "new" DTO, homicide rates in Ciudad Juárez dropped considerably in 2012 and 2013 compared to earlier years. This sudden decrease in violence has been attributed both to the actions of the police and President Calderón's socioeconomic program Todos Somos Juárez, or We Are All Juarez.65 Other analysts maintain that the Sinaloa DTO triumphed in its battle over the Juarez DTO and retained relatively peaceful and unchallenged control of the border city in recent years despite the Juárez DTO's continued presence in Chihuahua.66

The Juárez DTO had an enforcement arm, "La Linea," which has been prominent in the violence in Ciudad Juárez and elsewhere in the state of Chihuahua.67 Some analysts claim that in October 2013 La Linea split from the Juárez DTO and began to be funded and trained by Los Zetas, a DTO that reportedly made a successful incursion into the city.68 Similarly, the Barrio Azteca street gang, another former ally of the Juárez DTO, has also allegedly split from the cartel and now receives funding and training from Los Zetas.

Nevertheless, the split between the criminal groups may not ultimately prove relevant if another new development has taken place: Los Zetas, La Linea, and the Barrio Azteca are reportedly working cooperatively with the Juárez DTO to restore its presence in the city so it can again challenge Sinaloa. According to this analysis, Los Zetas and its allies have been allowed to operate relatively peacefully as Sinaloa's grip on the city considerably loosened in 2013 and the first half of 2014, forcing Sinaloa to tolerate the presence of Los Zetas.69

According to many press reports, Ciudad Juárez seems to be staging a "comeback," with the border city opening new restaurants, nightclubs, and stores. However, a complete recovery remains distant, as government sources reported as many as 10 murders a week during early 2014.70 Some have declared Ciudad Juárez a "security miracle," despite a still-violent atmosphere and its reported annual homicide rate of 28 per 100,000 in 2014. But many residents who fled during the years of intense drug-related violence remain reluctant to return to Juárez and cite the stubbornly-elevated homicide rate as one reason.71

Gulf DTO

Based in the border city of Matamoros, Tamaulipas, with operations in other Mexican states on the Gulf side of Mexico, this organization is a transnational smuggling operation with agents in Central and South America.72 The Gulf DTO was the main competitor challenging Sinaloa for trafficking routes in the early 2000s, but now battles its former enforcement wing, Los Zetas, over territory in northeastern Mexico. It has reportedly split into several competing gangs.

The Gulf DTO arose in the bootlegging era of the1920s. In the 1980s, its leader, Juan García Abrego, developed ties to Colombia's Cali cartel as well as to the Mexican federal police. García Abrego was captured in 1996 near Monterrey, Mexico.73 His violent successor, Osiel Cárdenas Guillén, successfully corrupted elite Mexican military forces to become his hired assassins. Those corrupted military personnel became known as Los Zetas when they fused with the Gulf cartel. In the early 2000s, Gulf was considered one of the most powerful Mexican DTOs. Cárdenas was arrested by Mexican authorities in March 2003, but he successfully continued to run his drug enterprise from prison until his extradition to the United States in 2007.74

Tensions between the Gulf DTO and Los Zetas culminated in their split in 2010. Antonio "Tony Tormenta" Cárdenas Guillén, Osiel's brother, was killed that year, and leadership of the Gulf went to another high-level Gulf lieutenant, Jorge Eduardo Costilla Sanchez, also known as "El Coss," until his arrest in 2012. Exactly what instigated the Zetas and Gulf split has not been determined, but the growing strength of the paramilitary group and their leader was a factor, and some analysts say the Zetas blamed the Gulf DTO for the murder of a Zeta close to their leader, which sparked the rift.75 Others posit the split happened earlier, but the Zetas organization that had brought both military discipline and sophisticated firepower to cartel combat was clearly acting independently by 2010. Regardless, the ensuing bitter conflict between the Gulf DTO and Los Zetas has been identified as the "most violent in the history of organized crime in Mexico."76

Mexican federal forces identified and targeted a dozen Gulf and Zeta bosses they believed responsible for the wave of violence in Tamaulipas in the spring and summer of 2014.77 Analysts have reported that the structures of both the Gulf DTO and Los Zetas have been decimated by federal action and combat between each other, and both groups now operate largely as fragmented cells that do not communicate with each other and often take on new names.78

In May 2014, the Mexican government deployed federal troops to the oil-rich border state of Tamaulipas just south of Texas, in an attempt to reassert control over the area.79 Newspaper sources outside of Tamaulipas and anonymous social media accounts report daily kidnappings, daytime shootings, and burned-down bars and restaurants in towns and cities in Tamaulipas, such as the port city of Tampico.80 Like the Zetas, fragmented cells of the Gulf DTO have expanded into other criminal operations, such as fuel theft and widespread extortion. One theory is that the Gulf DTO is posed to make a return to coherence following the decimation of Los Zetas and that Gulf will reconstitute and attempt to wrestle control of the strategically significant city of Monterrey in the neighboring state of Nuevo León.81 Other theories are that the Gulf DTO is now so fragmented and internally divided into factions itself that it is best understood—as are the Zetas—as part of a "regional crime umbrella" in Tamaulipas (see "DTO Fragmentation, Competitions, Diversification").

Los Zetas

This group originally consisted of former elite airborne special force members of the Mexican army who defected to the Gulf DTO and became its hired assassins.82 Although Zeta members are part of a prominent transnational DTO, their main asset is not drug smuggling, but organized violence. They have amassed significant power to carry out an extractive business model—thus generating revenue from crimes, such as fuel theft, extortion, human smuggling and kidnapping, that are widely seen to inflict more suffering on the Mexican public than transnational drug trafficking.83

Los Zetas manage a significant presence in several Mexican states on the Gulf (eastern) side of the country, have extended their reach to Ciudad Juárez (Chihuahua) and some Pacific states, and operate in Central and South America. More aggressive than other groups, Los Zetas appear to use intimidation as a strategy to maintain control of territory, making use of social media and public displays of bodies and body parts to send messages to frighten Mexican security forces, the local citizenry, and rival organizations. Sometimes smaller gangs and organizations use the "Zeta" name to tap into the benefits of the Zeta reputation or "brand."

Unlike many other DTOs, Los Zetas have not attempted to win the support of local populations in the territory in which they operate, and they have allegedly killed many civilians. They are linked to a number of massacres, such as the 2011 firebombing of a casino in Monterrey that killed 53 people and the torture and mass execution of 193 migrants in 2011 who were traveling through northern Mexico by bus.84 Los Zetas are known to kill those who cannot pay extortion fees or who refuse to work for them, often targeting migrants.85

In 2012, Mexican marines killed long-time Zeta leader, Heriberto Lazcano (alias "El Lazca"), one of the founders of Los Zetas, in a shootout in the northern state of Coahuila.86 The capture of his successor, Miguel Angel Treviño Morales, alias "Z-40," notorious for his brutality, in July 2013 by Mexican federal authorities was a second blow to the group. Some analysts date the beginning of the "loss of coherence" of Los Zetas to the killing of Lazcano, and the ensuing arrest of Treviño Morales as the event which accelerated the group's decline. In March 2015, Treviño Morales's brother Omar, who was thought to have taken over leadership of Los Zetas, was also arrested in a joint operation by the Mexican federal police and military. According to Mexico's attorney general, federal government efforts against the cartels, which resulted in the killing or capture of 93 (of 122) of Mexico's most high value criminal targets through April 2015, hit the Zetas the hardest, with more than 30 of their leaders removed.87

Los Zetas are known for their diversification and expansion into other criminal activities, such as fuel theft, extortion, kidnapping, human smuggling, and arms trafficking. In 2014, El Salvador's minister of security announced that Salvadoran authorities suspected Los Zetas of providing high-powered firearms to the MS-13, a prominent transnational gang based in El Salvador.88 Sophisticated fuel theft operations have grown rapidly in traditional Zeta strongholds, such as Tamaulipas, and continue to pose a pressing challenge for the state oil company, Petróleos Mexicanos (Pemex).89 According to media coverage, Pemex announced that it lost more than $1.15 billion to fuel theft in the first nine months of 2014. Los Zetas have demonstrated a capacity to develop sophisticated distribution networks for the oil and gas that they have stolen.90 The number of illegal fuel taps on Pemex oil and gas lines has reportedly grown exponentially, from 155 found in 2000 to 2,614 in 2013.91 The most incidents of illegal siphoning took place in the Mexican Gulf states of Tamaulipas and Veracruz.

As mentioned above, some analysts believe government action has critically weakened Los Zetas and caused the "balkanization" of the group into independent cells. Others analysts disagree and maintain that Los Zetas may continue to expand in 2015, but will be subject to internal splits.92 Some analysts maintain that the cartel is based on a franchise principle and is adept at reformulating itself to adjust to crisis. While many dispute the scope of the territory held by Los Zetas in 2014 and the formerly-cohesive group's immediate prospects, most concur that the organization is no longer as powerful as it was during the height of its dominance in 2011 under the leadership of Lazcano.

Beltrán Leyva Organization (BLO)

Before 2008, this syndicate was part of the Sinaloa federation and controlled access to the U.S. border in Mexico's Sonora state. The Beltrán Leyva brothers developed close ties with Sinaloa head Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzmán and his family, along with other Sinaloa-based top leadership. The January 2008 arrest of BLO's leader, Alfredo Beltrán Leyva, through intelligence reportedly provided by Guzmán, triggered BLO's split from the Sinaloa DTO.93 The two organizations have remained bitter rivals since.

The organization suffered a series of setbacks at the hands of the Mexican security forces beginning with the December 2009 killing of Arturo Beltrán Leyva, followed closely by the arrest of Carlos Beltrán Levya. In 2010, the organization broke up when the remaining brother, Héctor Beltrán Leyva, took the remnants of the BLO and rebranded it as the South Pacific Cartel (Pacifico Sur). Another top lieutenant, Edgar "La Barbie" Valdez Villarreal, took a faction loyal to him and formed the Independent Cartel of Acapulco, which he led until his arrest in 2010.94 The South Pacific Cartel has appeared to retake the name Beltrán Leyva Organization and achieved renewed prominence under Hector Beltrán Leyva's leadership, until his arrest in October 2014.

Splinter organizations have arisen since 2010, such as the Guerreros Unidos and Los Rojos, among at least five others with roots in the BLO. Los Rojos operates in Guerrero and relies heavily on kidnapping and extortion for revenue as well as trafficking cocaine, although analysts dispute the scope of its involvement in the drug trade.95 The Guerreros Unidos traffics cocaine as far north as Chicago in the United States and reportedly operates primarily in the central and Pacific states of Guerrero, México, and Morelos. The Guerreros Unidos, according to Mexican authorities, was responsible for taking the 43 Mexican teacher trainees that were handed to them by local authorities in Iguala, Guerrero, and subsequently murdered the students and burnt their bodies.96 The lack of a hegemonic DTO in Guerrero has led to significant infighting between DTO factions and brutal intra-cartel competition, resulting in the state of Guerrero having the highest number of homicides and kidnappings in the country in 2013 and the second most after the state of México in 2014.97

In April 2014, Mexican federal police arrested the BLO's second-in-command, Arnoldo Villa Sanchez in Mexico City, identified by authorities as the center of Villa Sanchez's operations. The BLO also has a presence in the central and southern states of Chiapas, Guerrero, Puebla, México, and Tlaxcala.98 A 2013 U.S. Department of the Treasury chart identified Villa Sanchez as Hector Beltrán Leyva's "head of security," but he was also clearly involved in coordinating drug shipments.99 In addition to the BLO's operations in the previously mentioned states, there have been reports of Beltrán Leyva presence in the Pacific states of Sinaloa and Nayarit. The BLO allegedly attempted to reassert control in the border state of Sonora following the capture of Sinaloa chief "El Chapo" Guzmán, but Mexican security analysts believe that the effort failed and Sinaloa remains dominant in the region.100 Like other DTOs, the BLO was believed to have infiltrated the upper levels of the Mexican government for at least part of its history, but whatever reach it once had has likely significantly declined in recent years following the arrest of many of its leaders, including Hector Beltrán Leyva in late 2014.101

La Familia Michoacana (LFM)

Based originally in the Pacific state of Michoacán, LFM traces its roots back to the 1980s. Formerly aligned with Los Zetas before the group's split from the Gulf DTO, LFM announced its intent to operate independently from Los Zetas in 2006, declaring that LFM's mission was to protect Michoacán from drug traffickers, including its new enemies, Los Zetas.102 From 2006 to 2010, LFM acquired notoriety for its use of extreme, symbolic violence, military tactics gleaned from the Zetas, and a pseudo-ideological or religious justification for its existence.103 LFM members reportedly made donations of food, medical care, schools, and other social services to benefit the poor in rural communities in order to project a populist "Robin Hood" image.

In 2010, however, LFM played a less prominent role, and in November 2010, the LFM reportedly called for a truce with the Mexican government and announced it would disband.104 A month later, spiritual leader and co-founder Nazario "El Más Loco" Moreno González was reportedly killed, although authorities claimed his body was stolen.105 Moreno González reappeared in another shootout with Mexican federal police in March 2014, after which his death was officially confirmed.106 Moreno González had been nurturing the development of a new criminal organization that emerged in early 2011 calling itself the Knights Templar and claiming to be a successor or offshoot of LFM.107

Though "officially" disbanded, LFM remained in operation, even after the June 2011 arrest of leader José de Jesús Méndez Vargas (alias "El Chango"), who allegedly took over after the disappearance of Moreno González.108 LFM is reportedly now led by Hector "El Player" Garcia.109 Though largely fragmented, remaining cells of La Familia Michoacana are still active in trafficking, kidnapping, and extortion in Guerrero and Mexico states, especially the working-class suburbs around Mexico City.110 Observers report that LFM has been largely driven out of Michoacán by the Knights Templar.111 As a DTO it has specialized in methamphetamine production and smuggling along with other synthetic drugs and has been known to traffic marijuana, cocaine, and to tax and regulate the production of heroin.

Knights Templar

This organization began as a splinter group from La Familia Michoacana, announcing its presence in Michoacán in early 2011. Like LFM, the Knights Templar began as a vigilante group, claiming to protect the residents of Michoacán from other criminal groups, such as the Zetas, but in reality operated as a DTO. The Knights Templar is known for the trafficking and manufacture of methamphetamine, but the organization also moves cocaine and marijuana north. Like LFM, it preaches its own version of evangelical Christianity and claims to have a commitment to "social justice," while being the source of much of the insecurity in Michoacán and surrounding states.

In 2013, frustration with the perceived ineffectiveness of Mexican law enforcement in combating predatory criminal groups led to the birth in Michoacán of "autodefensa" or self-defense organizations, particularly in the tierra caliente region in the southwestern part of the state. Composed of citizens from a wide range of backgrounds—farmers, ranchers, businessmen, former DTO operatives, and others—the self-defense militias primarily targeted members of the Knights Templar.112 Local business owners, who had grown weary of widespread extortion and hyper-violent crime that was ignored by corrupt local and state police, provided seed funding to resource the militias in Michoacán, but authorities cautioned that some of the self-defense groups had extended their search for resources and weapons to competing crime syndicates, such as the Cártel Jalisco New Generation (Cartel Jalisco Nueva Generación [CJNG]). Despite some analysts' contention that ties to rival criminal groups are highly likely, other observers are careful not to condemn the entire self-defense movement. These analysts acknowledge some gains in the effort to combat the Knights Templar that had not been made by government security forces, although conflict between self-defense groups has also led to violent battles.

The Knights Templar has reportedly emulated LFM's penchant for diversification into other crime, such as extortion. The Knights Templar battled the LFM, and by 2012 its control of Michoacán was nearly as widespread as LFM's had once been, especially by demanding local businesses pay it tribute through hefty levies. According to avocado growers in the rural state who provide more than half the global supply, LFM and the Knights Templar together reportedly took nearly 13% of their profits between 2009 and 2013, averaging about $150 million annually.113 In 2014, reportedly the successful extortion of lime growers in Michoacán resulted in the price of limes jumping by 14%.114 The Knights Templar also moved aggressively into illegal mining; in June 2014, Mexican officials claimed to have cumulatively seized over $70 million worth of iron ore from illegally-operated mines formerly controlled by the Knights Templar.115 Through mid-2014, the Knights Templar had reportedly been using Mexico's largest port, Lázaro Cárdenas, located in the southern tip of Michoacán, to smuggle illegally-mined iron ore among other illicit goods.116 Analysts and Mexican officials have maintained that the 2014 federal occupation of Lázaro Cárdenas resulted in an "impasse," rendering DTOs unable to receive and send shipments.117

In May 2014, the Mexican government began its controversial policy of incorporating members of the self-defense groups into legal law enforcement, giving them the option to disarm or register themselves and their weapons as part of the "Rural Police Force."118 Observers have raised concerns over this effort to legitimize what some see as "vigilante" justice, citing the unpredictability of such a policy and the potential for the groups to morph into predatory paramilitary forces as occurred in Colombia.119 The federal police and the Rural Police Force had a successful period of cooperation, which ended with the arrests of the two self-defense force leaders (as well as dozens of members) in April and June of 2014.120 The arrests sparked tension between the self-defense movement and federal police, contributing to high rates of violence in the area.121

The Mexican government and self-defense forces delivered heavy blows to the Knights Templar, especially with the confirmed killing in March 2014 of Nazario Moreno González, who led the Knights after his earlier reported death, and the killing of Enrique Plancarte, another top leader, several weeks later.122 Previously, the self-defense forces and the Knights Templar had reportedly split Michoacán roughly into two, although other criminal organizations continued to operate successfully in the area. In late February 2015, the Knights Templar DTO leader Servando "La Tuta" Gomez was captured. The former school teacher had taken risks by being interviewed in the media to make a case that his cartel had not plundered Michoacán and victimized civilians. With La Tuta's arrest, the fortunes of the Knights Templar plummeted.

Cartel Jalisco-New Generation (CJNG)

Originally known as the Zeta Killers, the CJNG made its first appearance in 2011 with a roadside display of the bodies of 35 alleged members of Los Zetas.123 It is a regional DTO based in Jalisco state with operations in central Mexico, including the states of Colima, Michoacán, Mexico State, and Guanajuato.124 Reportedly, it has been led by many former associates of slain Sinaloa DTO leader Ignacio "Nacho" Coronel, who operated his faction in Jalisco until he was killed by Mexico's security forces in July 2010.125 The CJNG has early roots in the Milenio cartel, and recently the Mexican government declared it to be one of the most dangerous cartels in the country and one of two with national reach.126 Concern about CJNG spiked after the shoot down of an Army helicopter on May 1, 2015—the first shoot down of a military helicopter by criminal forces reported in Mexico.

Like the Knights Templar and La Familia Michoacana, the CJNG has hung "narcomantas" (banners) with threatening messages to rival crime groups blended with a populist message that the CJNG is fighting to rid Mexico of its "bad actors" who are also its rivals. One such banner announcing CJNG presence in Guanajuato in September 2013, a state in Central Mexico bordering Michoacán and Jalisco, promised a "cleansing" of kidnappers and extortionists in the area.127

In early 2014, the Mexican government announced that officials had evidence that the CJNG had supplied arms to self-defense forces operating in Michoacán.128 Some observers maintain that some self-defense forces, which seek to protect their communities from crimes such as extortion and kidnapping, serve as a front for groups like the CJNG. While the strength of the ties between the self-defense movement and crime groups remains unclear, CJNG has benefitted from the self-defense forces' targeting and assistance in weakening the Knights Templar, its bitter rival.129

CJNG reportedly served as an enforcement group for the Sinaloa DTO until the summer of 2013.130 Analysts and Mexican authorities have suggested the split between Sinaloa and CJNG is one of the many indications of a general fragmentation of crime groups.131 Ruben Oseguera Cervantes, alias "El Mencho," is believed to be the group's current leader. The Mexican military delivered a blow to the CJNG with the July 2013 capture of its leader's deputy, Victor Hugo "El Tornado" Delgado Renteria.132 In January 2014, the Mexican government arrested the leader's son, Rubén Oseguera González (also known as "El Menchito"), believed to be CJNG's second-in-command. However, El Menchito, who has dual U.S.-Mexican citizenship, was released in December 2014 because of lack of evidence in a federal case. Captured again in late June 2015, El Menchito was again released by a judge. On July 3, 2015, he was re-arrested by Mexican authorities.

Members of CJNG have been suspected of coordinated attacks against the Mexican military, including the downing of a military helicopter in May 2015 during a wave of violence in Jalisco state. The criminal group has waged firefights against the Zetas and their allies, as well as the remnants of La Familia Michoacana and, most notably, the Knights Templar.133 In 2014, CJNG and the Knights Templar were reportedly locked in a battle over smuggling routes between Jalisco and Michoacán in an effort to protect their narcotics trafficking and production operations.134 Mexican prosecutors have attributed clandestine graves containing multiple bodies throughout Jalisco and other areas of CJNG's territory to the battles instigated by this very violent group, which has allegedly referred to itself as the "armed wing of the Mexican people."135 CJNG has responded with strident violence and, according to some observers, the government's militarized operation targeting the cartel known as Operation Jalisco will continue to concentrate on dismantling the group as long as CJNG's hyper-violent strategy continues to threaten the authorities and general population. El Mencho reportedly became Mexico's most wanted kingpin during the incarceration of Sinaloa leader El Chapo Guzmán.136

DTO Fragmentation, Competition, and Diversification

As stated earlier, the DTOs today are more fragmented and more competitive than the larger and more stable organizations that President Calderón faced at the beginning of his Administration in 2006. Analysts disagree about the extent of this fragmentation and its importance and whether the group of smaller organizations will be easier to dismantle. Fragmentation that began in 2010 and accelerated in 2011 redefined the "battlefield" and brought new actors, such as Los Zetas and the Knights Templar, to the fore. An array of smaller organizations are now active, and some of the once-small groups like CJNG have exploded into the space left after other DTOs were dismantled. Recently some analysts have identified Jalisco Cartel-New Generation as a cartel with national reach like the Sinaloa DTO, although it originally was an allied faction or the armed wing of Sinaloa organization. A newer cartel known as Los Cuinis has also been identified as a major organization in 2015. In April 2015, the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) named both CJNG and Los Cuinis as "Specially Designated Narcotics Traffickers" under its Kingpin Act. According to an OFAC statement, the traditional DTOs in Mexico are being replaced by new organizations that are becoming "among the most powerful drug trafficking organizations in Mexico."137

Contrary to the experience in Colombia in the 1980s and 1990s with the sequential dismantling of the enormous Medellin and Cali cartels, fragmentation in Mexico has been associated with escalating violence.138 A "kingpin strategy" implemented by the Mexican government has incapacitated numerous top- and mid-level leaders in all the major DTOs, either through arrests or deaths in arrest efforts. However, this strategy with political decentralization has contributed to violent succession struggles, shifting alliances among the DTOs, a proliferation of new gangs and small DTOs, and the replacement of existing leaders and criminal groups by ones who are even more violent.139 Analysts disagree about the extent of this fragmentation and its importance. Several analysts have observed that as the Mexican DTOs have fragmented and multiplied, violence has escalated.140 Others analysts caution not to overstate the level of fragmentation. Many of these organizations and smaller gangs are new, and it is premature to predict how they will fare. With the potential return of El Chapo to lead the Sinaloa DTO, it raises the question if other organizations and factions will align themselves with Sinaloa, whose leader has demonstrated such extraordinary cunning and capacity. On the other hand, these groups may relish their current autonomy and violently resist Sinaloa's attempt to dominate.

The ephemeral prominence of some new gangs and DTOs, regional changes in the power balance between different groups, and their shifting allegiances often catalyzed by government enforcement actions make it difficult to portray the current Mexican criminal landscape. The Stratfor Global Intelligence group contends that the rival crime networks are best understood now in regional groupings, and at least four geographic identities have emerged in 2014 and early 2015. Those umbrella groups are Tamaulipas state, Sinaloa state, "tierra caliente" regional group, and perhaps another umbrella group emerging along the southeastern coast of Mexico split off from the Tamaulipas umbrella group.141 (See Figure 3 for a map of the new cartel landscape.)

Another emerging factor has been the criminal diversification of the DTOs into poly-crime organizations. In addition to trafficking illegal narcotics, they have branched into other profitable crimes, such as kidnapping, assassination for hire, auto theft, controlling prostitution, extortion, money-laundering, software piracy, resource theft, and human smuggling. The surge in violence due to inter- and intra-cartel conflict over lucrative drug smuggling routes has been accompanied by an increase in kidnapping for ransom and other crimes.142 For 2014, however, the Mexican government maintained that violent crime (other than homicide) declined, such as kidnapping by a significant 17%. The government's crime statistics, however, are contested by several watchdog groups, and more than 90% of crimes go unreported because of lack of trust in the authorities.143

Some believe diversification may be evidence of organizational vitality and growth. Others contend that diversification signals that U.S. and Mexican drug enforcement measures are cutting into profits from drug trafficking or constitutes a response to shifting U.S. drug consumption patterns and policies, such as legalization of marijuana in some states.144 The growing public condemnation of the DTOs may also be stimulated by their diversification into street crime, which causes more harm to average Mexican civilians than intra- and inter-DTO violence related to conflicts over drug trafficking. Because the DTOs have diversified, many analysts now refer to them as transnational criminal organizations (TCOs), as organized crime groups, or as mafias.145 Others maintain that much of their non-drug criminal activity is in service of the central drug trafficking business.146 Whatever the label, no one has an accurate way to assess how much of the DTOs' income is earned from their non-drug activities.

Figure 3. Mexico Cartel Map for 2015

Stratfor Global Intelligence

Source: Stratfor Global Intelligence.

Notes: Republished with permission of Stratfor.

The current crime organization landscape is exceptionally fluid, yet several analysts are attempting to define it. For example, in Southern Pulse's publication Beyond 2012, Sam Logan and James Bosworth describe the increasing multiplication of groups:

The tendency for criminal groups in Mexico is toward small and local ... as the number of well-armed criminal groups jumps from the six significant groups we counted in 2006 ... to over 10 in 2012 with a steady growth of new groups to bring the total to possibly over 20 by the end of 2014.147

Analyst Eric Olson of the Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars believes the DTOs are more accurately described as "organized crime groups" and notes that these groups are extremely local in character while engaged in diverse criminal activity. (Many of the actors have diversified beyond the transnational drug trade, as noted above.)

Mexican political scientist Eduardo Guerrero-Gutiérrez also describes fragmentation and has provided a very useful typology of different DTOs (see Table 1). He defines four types: national cartels, toll-taker cartels, regional cartels, and local mafias. In 2015, Guerrero identified more than 200 organizations across the country in the final category. Some of these groups do not participate solely in drug trafficking-related violence, but are only engaged in what he terms "mafia-ridden" violence.148 Table 1. Drug Trafficking Organizations Typology

Category

Organizations

National cartelsThese DTOs control or maintain presence on numerous drug routes, including points of entry and exit along the northern and southern borders. Also, they operate major international routes to and from the country. Regardless of their wide territorial presence, they actively seek to expand control over new routes that lead to the north. These organizations have sought to build upon the profits they receive from drug trafficking to diversify their illegal portfolio mainly toward oil theft, a highly lucrative and low-risk activity.
  • Jalisco-Nueva Generación
  • Los Zetas
  • Sinaloa
Regional cartelsThese DTOs keep limited control over segments of drug trafficking routes passing through their territory. They play a secondary role in the drug trading business because they receive relatively smaller profits from it. However, these DTOs have aggressively diversified toward other criminal activities, such as extortion, kidnapping, oil theft, smuggling of goods and people, and vehicle theft.
  • Golfo
  • La Familia Michoacana
  • Los Caballeros Templarios
  • Pacífico Sur (Beltrán Leyva)
Toll collector cartelsThese are DTOs whose main income comes from toll fees received from other organizations that convey drug shipments through their controlled municipalities along the northern border. Given that these cartels are largely confined to some border municipalities, they cannot diversify their illegal activities as actively as other DTOs. If these DTOs eventually lose control of their respective border areas, they will probably disappear.
  • Juárez (Carrillo Fuentes)
  • Tijuana (Arellano Félix)
Drug trafficking cellsThese DTOs are mostly disbanded cells from larger organizations. These are locally based; however, their range of operations can extend from a few contiguous localities to several states. Their business activities are mainly focused in small-scale drug distribution. In some cases, they have extended their illegal businesses toward extortion, kidnapping, and vehicle theft.

In total, have been identified 202 mafia cells. The states with the highest number of mafia cells are Tamaulipas (42), Guerrero (25), and Distrito Federal (24)

Source: Eduardo Guerrero-Gutiérrez, June 2015.

Notes: Information provided to by analyst to CRS on July 14, 2015. Spanish names used in this table are translated as Jalisco-Nueva Generación=Jalisco Cartel-New Generation; Golfo=Gulf; Los Caballeros Templarios=Knights Templar.

Outlook

The escape of Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán, whether or not he is successfully recaptured, has potential consequences for the U.S.-Mexico security relationship and for the DTO landscape in the country and in Central America, if not more broadly. Despite arrests of significant Sinaloa leaders, the organization seems to have fared the best of the major DTOs that have been targeted by the government's kingpin strategy over the years—it has endured since the administration of Felipe Calderón in the early 2000s. Some observers question if the return of a predominant power—or hegemon—among the DTOs could bring about a permanently-lowered state of violence, what some analysts call a "pax mafiosa." Such an accommodation, however, would come at the price of the loss of state legitimacy. Some maintain that a mafia peace led by Sinaloa could potentially replace the complex multipolar and violent situation that has prevailed as large DTOs like Los Zetas and Gulf have broken into competing factions with unstable leadership. On the other hand, the continual flux and fluidity of the DTOs suggests that Sinaloa and its leaders may face a far different criminal environment than what Guzmán encountered when he was last a fugitive.

The goal of the Mexican government's counter-DTO strategy has been to diminish the extent and character of the DTOs' activity from a national security threat to a law and order problem and, once this is achieved, to transfer responsibility for addressing this challenge from military forces back to the police. Removing the military from their domestic policing function in Mexico, however, has not taken place under President Peña Nieto thus far. Instead the Mexican government has been challenged by accusations of human rights abuses, such as extrajudicial executions by members of the Mexican military in the case of an alleged massacre of several people by the army in Tlatlaya, Mexico, in July 2014.

Many U.S. government officials and policymakers have concerns about the Mexican government's capacity to lower the violence in Mexico and to effectively curb the power of Mexico's DTOs. The current government's reliance on a strategy of targeting drug kingpins has lowered the violence in some cases, but not the level of violence overall. (Some press reports maintain that May 2015 homicides crept back up to a level last seen in October 2013.) For some observers, Mexico's DTO challenge remains largely an organized crime or "mafia" problem coupled with endemic corruption. Accordingly, these analysts contend that the most important tools for managing it include long-term institutional reform to replace a culture of illegality and corruption with one of rule of law and respect for lawful authority.

Acknowledgments

CRS Intern Victoria Comesañas contributed to the research for this report.

Footnotes

1.

Kimberly Heinle, Cory Molzahn, and David A. Shirk, Drug Violence in Mexico: Data and Analysis Through 2014, Justice in Mexico Project, University of San Diego, April 2015; Kimberly Heinle, Octavio Rodriguez, and David A. Shirk, Drug Violence in Mexico: Data and Analysis Through 2013, Justice in Mexico Project, University of San Diego, April 2014. These annual reports synthesize Mexican government data from its National Institute of Statistics, Geography, and Information (INEGI) and Mexico's National Security System (SNSP). The SNSP data for 2013 and 2014 indicate an approximate decline of 15% for both 2013 and 2014 for intentional homicides in Mexico, while the INEGI information, which is reported later, tends to be lower in part because it measures a slightly different data set of all homicides derived by a different methodology.

2.

The Mexican news organizations, Reforma and Milenio, also keep a running tally of "narco-executions." For 2014, Reforma reported only 6,400 such killings, the lowest they have reported since 2008, while Milenio reported there were 7,993 organized crime-related murders. Ibid., (Heinle, Molzahn, and Shirk, April 2015).

3.

Robert J. MacCoun and Peter Reuter, Drug War Heresies: Learning from Other Times, Vices and Places (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001); Kevin Jack Riley, Snow Job? The War Against International Cocaine Trafficking (New Brunswick: Transactional Publishers, 1996).

4.

See, for example, Vanda Felbab-Brown, Peña Nieto's Piñata: The Promise and Pitfalls of Mexico's New Security Policy Against Organized Crime, Brookings Institution, February 2013.

5.

Patrick Corcoran, "Mexico Has 80 Drug Cartels: Attorney General," In Sight Crime: Organized Crime in the Americas, December 20, 2012.

6.

CRS Report R42917, Mexico: Background and U.S. Relations, by [author name scrubbed]; Vanda Felbab-Brown, Changing the Game or Dropping the Ball? Mexico's Security and Anti-Crime Strategy Under President Peña Nieto, Latin American Initiative, Brookings, November 2014. Velbab-Brown maintains that the government of Peña Nieto "has largely slipped into many of the same policies of President Felipe Calderón."

7.

For more background, see CRS Report IF10160, The Rule of Law in Mexico and the Mérida Initiative, by [author name scrubbed], and CRS Report R41349, U.S.-Mexican Security Cooperation: The Mérida Initiative and Beyond, by [author name scrubbed] and [author name scrubbed].

8.

See discussion in Kimberly Heinle, Cory Molzahn, and David A. Shirk, Drug Violence in Mexico: Data and Analysis Through 2014, Justice in Mexico Project, April 2015. Vanda Felbab-Brown, "El Chapo's Escape Signals That Things Must Change for Mexican Crime Policy," Brookings Brief, Brookings Institution, July 13, 2015. This article maintains standing up the gendarmerie distracted the Peña Nieto government from following through on other aspects of police reform.

9.

U.S. Department of Justice, National Drug Intelligence Center, National Drug Threat Assessment: 2011, August 2011, http://www.justice.gov/ndic/pubs44/44849/44849p.pdf, hereinafter referred to as the NDTA. The NDTA 2011 estimated that the Mexican DTOs maintain drug distribution networks in 1,000 cities across the United States.

10.

Richard Faussett, "Mexico Under Siege; Mexico May Be Losing War on Dirty Cops; President Calderon Vowed to Create a Trustworthy Federal Police. Now Citizens Scoff at the Notion," Los Angeles Times, August 30, 2012; Randal, "Some observers contend that standing up the force distracted the Peña Nieto government from following through on other aspects of police reform"; C Archibold and Karla Zabludovsky, "Mexico Detains 12 Officers in Attack on Americans in Embassy Vehicle," New York Times, August 28, 2012; Michael Weissenstein and Olga R. Rodriguez, "Mexican Cops Detained in Shooting of US Government Employees that Highlights Police Problems," Associated Press, August 27, 2012.

11.

Ioan Grillo, "Mexican Cartels Invent Ingenious Weapons to Help Battle Government," Time, April 29, 2015. This article warns that the crime groups in Mexico may use drones or new printing technologies in the future to improve their arms and trafficking capabilities. See also Robert J. Bunker and John P. Sullivan, Crime Wars and Narco-Terrorism in the Americas: A Small Wars Journal-El Centro Anthology (iUniverse, 2014).

12.

Representative Jason Chaffetz and Representative Filemon Vela, letter to U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, June 4, 2015, at https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2093425-2015-06-04-jc-vela-hsc-to-kerry-dos-mexico.html.

13.

See National Defense Authorization Act FY2016 (the House-passed version of H.R. 1735), Section 1275.

14.

Patrick Corcoran, "Mexico Government Report Points to Ongoing Criminal Fragmentation," In Sight Crime: Organized Crime in the Americas, April 14, 2015.

15.

Christopher Sherman, "Drug War Death Tolls a Guess Without Bodies," Associated Press, March 26, 2013.

16.

James Bargent, "2014: A Record Year for Disappearances in Mexico," In Sight Crime: Organized Crime in the Americas, November 20, 2014.

17.

The NDTA, February 2010, states, "Direct violence similar to the violence occurring among major DTOs in Mexico is rare in the United States." For a discussion of why the violence has not spread into the United States, see CRS Report R41075, Southwest Border Violence: Issues in Identifying and Measuring Spillover Violence, by [author name scrubbed].

18.

For a discussion of both incidents see Op. cit., Peña Nieto's Challenge: Criminal Cartels and Rule of Law in Mexico. In addition, see Michael Weissenstein and Olga R. Rodriguez, "Mexican Cops Detained in Shooting of U.S. Government Employees That Highlights Police Problems," Associated Press, August 27, 2012.

19.

Steven Dudley and David Gagne, "Iguala Massacre: Mexico's PR Message Goes Up in Flames," InSight Crime: Organized Crime in the Americas, November 10, 2014.

20.

Randal C. Archibold, "Mexico Official Declares Missing Students Dead," New York Times, January 28, 2015.

21.

Juan Diego Quesada, "Mexican Police Capture One of the Masterminds Behind Iguala Massacre," El Pais, May 8, 2015.

22.

"Mexico Says Officials Must Have Helped Drug Lord Guzman Escape," Reuters, July 13, 2015; "México Dice que El Chapo Necesitó 'la Complicidad del Personal" de la Cárcel," Univision, July 13, 2015, at http://noticias.univision.com/article/2399872/2015-07-13/mexico/noticias/el-chapo-osorio-chong-mensaje.

23.

For further discussion of corruption of U.S. and Mexican officials, see Loren Riesenfeld, "Mexico Cartels Recruiting US Border Agents: Inspector General," InSight Crime: Organized Crime in the Americas, April 16, 2015; CRS Report R41349, U.S.-Mexican Security Cooperation: The Mérida Initiative and Beyond, by [author name scrubbed] and [author name scrubbed].

24.

Astorga and Shirk, Drug Trafficking Organizations and Counter-Drug Strategies, p. 5.

25.

Francisco E. Gonzalez, "Mexico's Drug Wars Get Brutal," Current History, February 2009.

26.

Shannon O'Neil, "The Real War in Mexico: How Democracy Can Defeat the Drug Cartels," Foreign Affairs, vol. 88, no. 4 (July/August 2009).

27.

U.S. Department of State, 2011 International Narcotics Control Strategy Report (INCSR), March 2011.

28.

The region where Sinaloa comes together with the states of Chihuahua and Durango is a drug-growing area sometimes called Mexico's "Golden Triangle" after the productive area of Southeast Asia by the same name. In this region, according to press reports, a third of the population is estimated to make their living from the illicit drug trade.

29.

U.S. Department of State, 2013 International Narcotics Control Strategy Report (INCSR), Vol. 1, March 2013. The total amount of methamphetamine seized by Mexico's authorities in 2012 was 30 metric tons.

30.

See Patrick Corcoran, "How Mexico's Underworld Became Violent," In Sight Crime: Organized Crime in the Americas, April 2, 2013. The article maintains that "... the activities and organization of the criminal groups operating in the clandestine industry have been in a state of constant flux. That flux, which continues today, lies at the heart of Mexico's violence."

31.

Oscar Becerra, "Traffic Report–Battling Mexico's Sinaloa Cartel," Jane's Information Group, May 7, 2010. The author describes the networked structure: "The Sinaloa Cartel is not a strictly vertical and hierarchical structure, but instead is a complex organization containing a number of semi-autonomous groups."

32.

Karen McVeigh, "US 'Deeply Concerned' over Freeing of Mexico Drug Lord Rafael Caro Quintero," The Guardian, August 11, 2013.

33.

"May Day Mayhem," Economist, May 9, 2015; Juan Montes, "Deadly Mexican Cartel Rises as New Threat: President Peña Nieto Deploys Forces to Confront the New Generation Jalisco Cartel After a Spate of Violence," Wall Street Journal Online, May 13, 2015.

34. John Bailey, "Drug Trafficking Organizations and Democratic Governance," in The Politics of Crime in Mexico: Democratic Governance in a Security Trap (Boulder: FirstForum Press, 2014), p. 121. For an explanation of a tollgate cartel or DTO, see Table 1. 35.

Special Agent Camarena was an undercover DEA agent working in Mexico who was kidnapped, tortured, and killed in 1985. The Guadalajara-based Felix Gallardo network broke up in the wake of the investigation of its role in the murder.

36.

Mark Stevenson, "Mexico Arrests Suspected Drug Trafficker Named in US Indictment," Associated Press, October 24, 2013.

37.

Steven Dudley, "Who Controls Tijuana?" InSight Crime: Organized Crime in the Americas, May 3, 2011. Sanchez Arellano, nephew of the founding Arellano Felix brothers, took control in 2006 after the arrest of his uncle, Javier Arellano Felix.

38.

E. Eduardo Castillo and Elliot Spagat, "Mexico Arrests Leader of Tijuana Drug Cartel," Associated Press, June 24, 2014.

39.

Stratfor, Mexico Security Memo: Torreon Leader Arrested, Violence in Tijuana, April 24, 2013, http://www.stratfor.com/analysis/mexico-security-memo-torreon-leader-arrested-violence-tijuana#axzz37Bb5rDDg. In 2013, Nathan Jones at the Baker Institute for Public Policy asserted that the Sinaloa-AFO agreement allows those allied with the Sinaloa DTO, such as the Cártel Jalisco Nueva Generación, or otherwise not affiliated with Los Zetas to also use the plaza. See "Explaining the Slight Uptick in Violence in Tijuana" for more information at http://bakerinstitute.org/files/3825/.

40.

Op. cit. Castillo and Spagat, 2014.

41.

Kyra Gurney, "'Narco-Mom' Takes Charge of Tijuana Cartel," InSight Crime: Organized Crime in the Americas, June 26, 2014; Ioan Grillo, "Meet the First Woman to Lead a Mexican Drugs Cartel," Time, July 7, 2015.

42.

CRS Interview with Security Analyst Alejandro Hope, July 2014.

43.

Patrick Radden Keefe, "Cocaine Incorporated," New York Times, June 15, 2012; "Mexico: Security," Jane's Sentinel Security Assessment: Central America and the Caribbean, March 25, 2015. The Jane's security assessment notes that "Sinaloa cartel is still the most powerful criminal organization in Mexico and the only one that can operate trafficking activities nationwide."

44.

Natalie Jennings, "'El Chapo,' by the Numbers," Washington Post, February 26, 2014.

45.

Luis Pablo Beauregard, "Mexico Braces for Fresh Drug Violence After Sinaloa Cartel Chief's Capture," El Pais, February 27, 2014. The "Golden Triangle" contains three of four Mexican states where opium poppy and cannabis are primarily grown. See U.S. Department of State, Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs, 2014 International Narcotic Control Strategy Report, March 2014, p. 234. Mexican security analyst Alejandro Hope has suggested that Sinaloa may maintain control of Chihuahua, despite the 2013 map provided by DEA showing otherwise.

46.

CRS interview with Eduardo Guerrero-Gutiérrez, July 2014.

47.

U.S. Department of Justice, NDTA 2011, August 2011.

48.

Patrick Radden Keefe, "Cocaine Incorporated," New York Times, June 15, 2012, pp. 4-5. The head of the Sinaloa DTO, "El Chapo" Guzman, has been credited for Sinaloa's reputation for innovation. See also Catherine E. Shoichet, "Tunnel Vision: A Look Inside El Chapo's Underground Hideaways," CNN, July 14, 2015.

49.

Op. cit., Beauregard, 2014.

50.

"Mexico Risk: Alert - The Security Outlook Post 'Chapo' Guzmán's Capture," Risk Briefing to the UN, Economist Intelligence Unit, February 27, 2014; Joshua Partlow and Nick Miroff, "After Drug Lord's Arrest, Mexico Braces for Fallout; Some Analysts Fear Heightened Violence, Others Say Drug Business Will Continue Unchanged," Washington Post, February 25, 2014.

51.

Kyra Gurney, "Sinaloa Cartel Leader 'El Azul' Dead? 'El Mayo' Now in Control?" InSight Crime: Organized Crime in the Americas, June 9, 2014. Esparragoza is married to Guzmán's sister-in-law, was the godfather of Amado Carrillo Fuentes' son and one of Ismael Zambada's sons, and his son is married to the daughter of one of the Beltrán Levyas.

52.

Kyra Gurney, "Sinaloa Cartel Leader 'El Azul' Dead? 'El Mayo' Now in Control?" June 9, 2014. Esparragoza Moreno supposedly died of a heart attack while recovering from injuries sustained in a car accident.

53.

Observers dispute the extent to which Guzmán made key strategic decisions for Sinaloa. Some maintain he was a figurehead whose arrest had little impact on Sinaloa's functioning as he ceded operational tasks to Zambada Garcia and Esparragoza long before his arrest.

54.

Revelan Estructura y Enemigos de 'El Chapo'," Excélsior, March 26, 2014; John Bailey, "Drug Trafficking Organizations and Democratic Governance," in The Politics of Crime in Mexico: Democratic Governance in a Security Trap (Boulder: FirstForum Press, 2014), p. 119.

55.

"Number of Bodies Found in Mexican State Rises to 18," EFE News Service, June 11, 2014. Some have predicted an increase in external and internal violence following the alleged death of Esparragoza. It should be noted that it is not unheard of for Mexican DTO leaders to fake their own deaths to decrease pressure from authorities.

56.

CRS interview with Alejandro Hope, July 2014.

57.

Alejandro Hope, "El Chapo's Great Escape," El Daily Post, July 12, 2015.

58.

See Ginger Thompson, "At Breakfast to Talk El Chapo, Drug War Veterans Serve Up Cynicism," Pro Publica, July 20, 2015, at http://www.propublica.org/article/at-breakfast-to-talk-el-chapo-drug-war-veterans-serve-up-cynicism.

59.

Alfredo Corchado, "Mexican Drug Lord's Escape May Mean More Violence on Border," Dallas Morning News, July 14, 2015.

60.

John Bailey, "Drug Trafficking Organizations and Democratic Governance," in The Politics of Crime in Mexico: Democratic Governance in a Security Trap (Boulder, CO: FirstForum Press, 2014), p. 121.

61.

Some analysts trace the origins of the split to a personal feud between "El Chapo" Guzmán of the Sinalos DTO and former ally Vicente Carrillo Fuentes. In 2004, Guzmán allegedly ordered the killing of Rodolfo Carrillo Fuentes, another of Vicente's brothers. Guzmán's son, Edgar, was killed in May 2008 allegedly on orders from Carrillo Fuentes. See Alfredo Corchado, "Juárez Drug Violence Not Likely to Go Away Soon, Authorities Say," Dallas Morning News, May 17, 2010.

62.

Steven Dudley, "Police Use Brute Force to Break Crime's Hold on Juárez," InSight Crime: Organized Crime in the Americas, February 13, 2013. Some Mexican newspapers such as El Diario reported more than 300 homicides a month in 2010 when the violence peaked.

63.

For a more in-depth narrative of the conflict in Juárez and its aftermath, see Steven Dudley, "Juárez: After the War," Insight Crime: Organized Crime in the Americas, February 13, 2013. For a discussion of border city displacement and migration due to drug-related violence, see Viridiana Rios Contreras, "The Role of Drug-Related Violence and Extortion in Promoting Mexican Migration: Unexpected Consequences of a Drug War," Latin America Research Review, vol. 49, no. 3 (2014). The author estimates that more than 40,000 residents fled Ciudad Juárez between 2006 and 2010 due to violence.

64.

"Mexico Security Memo: A New Juárez Cartel," Stratfor, February 1, 2012. The New Juárez Cartel was seen by many analysts as a re-branding effort by the original Juárez DTO and its allies, and not an actual new organization. The New Juárez Cartel soon dropped the "New" adjective.

65.

Calderón launched the social program Todos Somos Juárez and sent the Mexican military into Ciudad Juárez in an effort to drive out DTO proxies and operatives. "Calderón Defiende la Estrategia en Ciudad Juárez en Publicación de Harvard," CNNMexico, February 17, 2013. See also CRS Report R41349, U.S.-Mexican Security Cooperation: The Mérida Initiative and Beyond, by [author name scrubbed] and [author name scrubbed].

66.

Some observers have alleged that Mexican and U.S. law enforcement favored the Sinaloa DTO and set them up as the victors. See Steven Dudley, "How Juárez's Police, Politicians Picked Winners of Drug War," InSight Crime: Organized Crime in the Americas, February 13, 2013.

67.

CRS interview with John Bailey, June 2014. La Linea suffered a major loss with the July 2011 arrest of its leader, José Antonio "El Diego" Acosta Hernández, who then confessed to ordering over 1,500 murders and was convicted of the March 2010 murder of three people connected to the U.S. consulate in Juárez. He was extradited to the United States and convicted in federal court on charges of murder and drug trafficking and sentenced to four consecutive life sentences in April 2012. The Acosta case represents increasingly close cooperation between Mexican and U.S. authorities on bringing hyper-violent offenders to justice.

68.

"Mexico's Drug War: Stability Ahead of Fourth Quarter Turmoil," Stratfor-Security Weekly, October 10, 2013.

69.

Lorena Figueroa, "Analyst: Sinaloa Cartel Losing Power in Juárez," El Paso Times, April 17, 2014. Figueroa reported on the U.S.-Mexico Border Security Summit held in El Paso in April 2014, where Scott Stewart, Stratfor's vice-president of tactical intelligence, made a presentation on the Mexican DTOs.

70.

Tracy Wilkinson, "In Mexico, Ciudad Juárez Reemerging from Grip of Violence," Los Angeles Times, May 4, 2014.

71.

As of the end of 2013, only about 10% of those who had fled during the most violent years of 2007-2011 had returned to Ciudad Juárez. See Damien Cave, "Ciudad Juárez, a Border City Known for Killing, Gets Back to Living," New York Times, December 13, 2013.

72.

John Bailey, "Drug Trafficking Organizations and Democratic Governance," in The Politics of Organized Crime in Mexico: Democratic Governance in a Security Trap (Boulder: FirstForum Press, 2014), p. 120.

73.

Steven Dudley and Sandra Rodríguez, Civil Society, the Government and the Development of Citizen Security, Wilson Center Mexico Institute, Working Paper, August 2013, p. 11.

74.

George W. Grayson, Mexico: Narco-Violence and a Failed State? (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 2010).

75.

Eduardo Guerrero Gutierrez, "El Dominio del Miedo," Nexos, July 1, 2014. Suspecting the Gulf DTO of the death of Sergio Mendoza, the founder of Los Zetas, Heriberto "El Lazco" Lazcano reportedly offered a 24-hour amnesty period for Gulf operatives to claim responsibility, which they never did. This event, some scholars maintain, was the origin of the split between the groups.

76.

Eduardo Guerrero Gutierrez is a Mexican security analyst and a former security advisor to President Enrique Peña Nieto. CRS interview in June 2014.

77.

Jorge Monroy, "Caen tres lideres de Los Zetas y Cartel de Golfo," June 18, 2014. In June 2014, Mexican marines captured three of those identified.

78.

Interview with Eduardo Guerrero, June 2014. "Balkanization," or decentralization of the structure of the organization, does not necessarily indicate that a criminal group is weak, but simply that it lacks a strong central leadership. The sudden loss of leadership may temporarily weaken a criminal organization until the structure of the organization shifts toward independently-operated cells, in which case the reconstituted group may return to power.

79.

Joshua Partlow, "An Oil-Rich Area Just South of Texas Is Mexico's Newest Drug-War Crisis Zone," Washington Post, May 31, 2014; Christopher Sherman, "Mexico Sets Security Plan for Violent Border State," Associated Press, May 13, 2014. The federal government divided Tamaulipas into four areas, each controlled by a military commander. The Mexican government also announced that corrupt local and state law enforcement officials were to be purged through a vetting and certification program, and more funding would be directed toward intelligence operations to combat extortion and kidnapping.

80.

Ibid. Joshua Partlow reports that local news outlets inside Tamaulipas are so threatened by DTO cells that they are intimidated to report on criminal violence and its consequences.

81.

Juan Carlos Perez Salazar, "¿Qué Pasó con Los Zetas, el Cartel Más Temido?," BBC Mundo—Animal Político, May 20, 2014.

82.

Most reports indicate that Loz Zetas were created by a group of 30 lieutenants and sub-lieutenants who deserted from the Mexican military's Special Mobile Force Group (Grupos Aeromóviles de Fuerzas Especiales, GAFES) to join the Gulf cartel in the late 1990s.

83.

John Bailey, "Drug Trafficking Organizations and Democratic Governance," in The Politics of Crime in Mexico: Democratic Governance in a Security Trap (Boulder, CO: FirstForum Press, 2014), p. 120; interview with Alejandro Hope, July 2014.

84.

George Grayson, The Evolution of Los Zetas in Mexico and Central America: Sadism as an Instrument of Cartel Warfare, U.S. Army War College Strategic Studies Institute, Carlisle, PA, April 2014, p. 9.

85.

According to Grayson, Los Zetas are also believed to kill members of law enforcement officials' families in revenge for action taken against the organization, reportedly even targeting families of fallen military men.

86.

Will Grant, "Heriberto Lazcano: The Fall of a Mexican Drug Lord," BBC News, October 13, 2012.

87.

"Los Zetas Are the Criminal Organization Hardest Hit by the Mexican Government," Southernpulse.info, May 13, 2015.

88.

"Denuncian que maras salvadoreñas son armadas por los Zetas," BBC Mundo: Animal Politico, April 26, 2014.

89.

"Stealing Fuel from Pipelines Big Business in Mexico," InSight Crime: Organized Crime in the Americas, February 3, 2014.

90.

Michael Lohmuller, "Will Pemex's Plan to Fight Mexico Oil Thieves Work?," InSight Crime: Organized Crime in the Americas, February 18, 2015.

91.

"Major Increase of Illegal Oil Siphoning in Mexico Leads to Losses in the Millions," Fox News Latino, February 5, 2014.

92.

"Mexico's Drug War: A New Way to Think About Mexican Organized Crime," Stratfor Global Intelligence, January 15, 2015.

93.

See InSight Crime: Organized Crime in the Americas profile, "Beltrán Leyva Organization." The profile suggests that Guzmán gave authorities information on Alfredo Beltrán Leyva in order to secure his son's release from prison.

94.

Edgar Valdez is an American-born smuggler from Laredo, Texas, and allegedly started his career in the United States dealing marijuana. His nickname is "La Barbie" due to his fair hair and eyes. Nicholas Casey and Jose de Cordoba, "Alleged Drug Kingpin Is Arrested in Mexico," Wall Street Journal, August 31, 2010.

95.

Marguerite Cawley, "Murder Spike in Guerrero, Mexico Points to Criminal Power Struggle," InSight Crime: Organized Crime in the Americas, May 30, 2014. "Mexico Nabs Drug Gang Leader in State of Guerrero," Associated Press, May 17, 2014. The AP reports that the Mexican security commissioner claims Los Rojos as primarily responsible for cocaine shipments from Guerrero to the United States. Insight Crime analysts, however, argue that the group lacks the international ties to rely consistently on drug trafficking as a primary revenue source.

96.

According to the profile of Guerreros Unidos on the InSight Crime website, an alleged leader of the group is the brother-in-law of the former mayor of Iguala.

97.

Marguerite Cawley, "Murder Spike in Guerrero, Mexico Points to Criminal Power Struggle," InSight Crime: Organized Crime in the Americas, May 30, 2014; op. cit., Heinle, Molzahn, and Shirk, April 2015.

98.

Lizbeth Diaz, Elinor Comlay, and Tom Brown, "Mexico Captures Senior Drug Boss Operating in Mexico City," Reuters, April 16, 2014.

99.

"Mexico Nabs No. 2 in Beltrán-Leyva Gang," Associated Press, April 16, 2014.

100.

Felipe Larios and Mark Stevenson, "Killing of 7 Marks Rise of Mexico Drug Corridor," Associated Press, March 21, 2014.

101.

James C. McKinley, Jr., "Keeping Residents Close and Maybe a Cartel Closer, Mexican Mayor's First Months in Office Marked by Scandal, Twists," Pittsburg Post-Gazette, April 25, 2010. Also see Insight Crime profile on the BLO, which claims that ties to Mexican officials enabled the Beltrán Leyva brothers to orchestrate "Chapo" Guzman's escape from prison in 2001.

102.

Alejandro Suverza, "El Evangelio según La Familia," Nexos, January 1, 2009. For more on its early history, see InSight Crime's profile on La Familia Michoacana.

103.

In 2006, LFM gained notoriety when it rolled five severed heads allegedly of rival criminals across a discotheque dance floor in Uruapan. La Familia Michoacana was known for leaving signs ("narcomantas") on corpses and at crime scenes that referred to LFM actions as "divine justice." William Finnegan, "Silver or Lead," New Yorker, May 31, 2010.

104.

Stratfor, "Mexican Drug Wars: Bloodiest Year to Date," December 20, 2010.

105.

Dudley Althaus, "Ghost of 'The Craziest One' Is Alive in Mexico," InSight Crime: Organized Crime in the Americas, June 11, 2013.

106.

Mark Stevenson and E. Eduardo Castillo, "Mexico Cartel Leader Thrived by Playing Dead," Associated Press, March 10, 2014.

107.

The Knights Templar was purported to be founded and led by Servando "La Tuta" Gomez, a former school teacher and a lieutenant to Moreno Gonzáles. However, after Moreno Gonzalez's faked demise and taking advantage of his death in the eyes of Mexican authorities, Moreno González and Gomez founded the Knights Templar together after a dispute with LFM leader Méndez Vargas, who stayed on with the LFM. See "Seeking a Place in History – Nazario Moreno's Narco Messiah," InSight Crime: Organized Crime in the Americas, March 13, 2014.

108.

Adriana Gomez Licon, "Mexico Nabs Leader of Cult-Like La Familia Cartel," Associated Press, June 21, 2011.

109.

"Arrests Show Familia Michoacana Still Alive in Southwest Mexico," InSight Crime: Organized Crime in the Americas, May 22, 2014.

110.

CRS Interview with Dudley Althaus, June 2014.

111.

Ibid.

112.

The self-defense forces pursue criminal groups to other towns and cities and are self-appointed, sometimes gaining recruits who are former migrants returned from or deported from the United States; and many are heavily armed. After a period of cooperation, the Mexican federal police made news when it arrested 83 members of the self-defense forces in June 2014 for possession of unregistered weapons. "Arrestan a 83 Miembros y a Líder de Autodefensas en México," Associated Press, June 27, 2014.

113.

Lydiette Carrion, "Templarios Controlaron Aguacate," El Universal, April 8, 2014.

114.

"Templarios 'Amargan' el 5 de Mayo en EU," Noticias Financieras, May 6, 2014.

115.

"Mexico Seizes $70 million in Ore That Diversified from Drugs to Mining," Associated Press, June 11, 2014.

116.

"Mexico Seizes Tonnes of Minerals in Port Plagued by Drug Gangs," Reuters, March 3, 2014. The Knights shared control with the powerful Sinaloa DTO. Both groups reportedly received shipments there of cocaine from South America and precursor chemicals used to produce methamphetamines largely from Asia.

117.

Interview with Eduardo Guerrero, July 2014.

118.

Nick Miroff and Joshua Partlow, "In Mexico, Militias Taste Power," Washington Post, May 12, 2014.

119.

John Bailey interview, June 2014. Bailey authored The Politics of Crime in Mexico: Democratic Governance in a Security Trap, 2014. According to the author, the self-defense forces in Mexico have the potential to follow the positive route of Peru's Rondas Campesinas, or the more deleterious path of Colombian self-defense forces in the late 1990s, which was "disastrous."

120.

The Mexican federal police arrested 83 members of the self-defense forces (including a well-known leader) in June 2014 for possession of unregistered weapons, an event largely seen as destroying chances for further cooperation between Mexican law enforcement and the self-defense forces. "Arrestan a 83 Miembros y a Líder de Autodefensas en México," Associated Press, June 27, 2014. For more information on the tensions between the self-defense movement and Mexican authorities, see Steven Dudley and Dudley Althaus, "Mexico's Security Dilemma: The Battle for Michoacán," Woodrow Wilson Center, Mexico Institute, April 30, 2014.

121.

Ibid. The authors of the report suggest that the situation in Michoacán is "a battle on four fronts:" factions of the self-defense forces are fighting each other, self-defense forces battling the Knights Templar, self-defense forces fighting Mexican federal forces, and DTOs fighting federal forces.

122.

Olga R. Rodriguez, "Mexican Marines Kill Templar Cartel's Leader," Associated Press, April 1, 2014.

123.

Miriam Wells, "Jalisco Cartel Announces "Cleansing" of Mexican State," InSight Crime, September 20, 2013.

124.

"Se Pelean el Estado de México 4 carteles," El Siglo de Torreón, March 2, 2014; interview with Dudley Althaus, 2014.

125.

CRS interview with Alejandro Hope, July 2014. See also Peña Nieto's Challenge: Criminal Cartels and Rule of Law in Mexico, especially Appendix D: Main Cartels in Mexico; Stratfor, "Mexico Security Memo: The Death of a Cartel de Jalisco Nueva Generacion Ally," February 27, 2013; Stratfor, "Mexican Cartels: Cartel de Jalisco Nueva Generacion," April 4, 2013; "Jalisco Cartel – New Generation," InSight Crime: Organized Crime in the Americas, May 5, 2015.

126.

Michael Lohmuller, "Only Two Cartels Left in Mexico: Official," InSight Crime: Organized Crime in the Americas, June 10, 2015.

127.

Armando Gutierrez Rodriguez, "Anuncia Cartel "Una Limpia" de Secuestradores en Guanajuato," Proceso, September 17, 2013.

128.

Rosa Santana, "Cártel de Jalisco armó a autodefensas: Murillo Karam," Proceso, January 30, 2014.

129.

CRS interview with Alejandro Hope, July 2014.

130.

Claire O'Neill McCleskey, "New Generation Jalisco Cartel Leader Captured in Mexico," InSight Crime, July 22, 2013.

131.

Ibid; CRS interview with Dudley Althaus, 2014.

132.

Claire O'Neill McCleskey, 2014.

133.

Marguerite Cawley, "Ambush of Mexico Soldiers Reminder of Jalisco Cartel's Power," InSight Crime: Organized Crime in the Americas, May 14, 2014; "Security Official Says Mexican Cartel Used RPG to Down Military Helicopter," Animal Politico, May 4, 2015; Jesus Perez, "Losing the Fight Against Mexico's Jalisco Cartel, Insight Crime: Organized Crime in the Americas, May 21, 2015.

134.

"México-Al Menos Tres Muertos por Enfrentamientos entre Cárteles en el Limite entre Michoacán y Jalisco," Europa Press-Notiamerica, April 30, 2014. "Detienen a segundo del cartel Jalisco Nueva Generación," Animal Politico, January 30, 2014; interview with Alejandro Hope, July 2014.

135.

Marguerite Cawley, "Ambush of Mexico Soldiers Reminder of Jalisco Cartel's Power," InSight Crime, May 14, 2014.

136.

David Gagne, "Challenging the State a Poor Strategy for Mexico's Jalisco Cartel," InSight Crime: Organized Crime in the Americas, May 4, 2015; Jeremy Bender, "Mexico's Drug War Is Getting Even Worse," Business Insider, May 15, 2015.

137.

U.S. Department of the Treasury, "Treasury Sanctions Two Major Mexican Drug Organizations and Two of Their Leaders," press release, April 8, 2015, at http://www.treasury.gov/press-center/press-releases/Pages/jl10020.aspx.

138.

In Colombia's case, successfully targeting the huge and wealthy Medellín and Cali cartels and dismantling them meant that a number of smaller drug trafficking organizations replaced them ("cartelitos"). The smaller organizations have not behaved as violently as the larger cartels, and thus the Colombian government was seen to have reduced violence in the drug trade. Critical, however, were factors in Colombia that were not present in Mexico, such as the presence of guerrilla insurgents and paramilitaries who became deeply involved in the illegal drug business. Some have argued that the Colombian cartels of the 1980s and 1990s were structured and managed very differently than their contemporary counterparts in Mexico.

139.

Stratfor, "Mexico's Drug Wars: Bloodiest Year to Date," December 20, 2010; Stratfor, "Mexican Drug Wars Update: Targeting the Most Violent Cartels," July 21, 2011.

140.

O'Neil, "Drug Cartel Fragmentation and Violence;" Eduardo Guerrero Gutiérrez, "La Raiz de La Violencia," Nexos en Línea, June 1, 2011. Guerrero also maintains that eliminating DTO leaders has dispersed the violence.

141.

"Stratfor now divides Mexican organized criminal groups into the distinct geographic areas from which they emerged. This view is not just a convenient way of categorizing an increasingly long list of independent crime groups in Mexico, but rather it reflects the internal realities of most crime groups in Mexico." See Stratfor Global Intelligence, "Mexico's Drug War Update: Tamaulipas-Based Groups Struggle," April 16, 2015; and "Mexico's Drug War: A New Way to Think About Mexican Organized Crime," January 15, 2015.

142.

U.S. Department of State, 2015 International Narcotics Control Strategy Report, Volume 1, March 2015.

143.

Elyssa Pachico, "Is the Government Manipulating Kidnap Statistics in Mexico?" InSight Crime: Organized Crime in the Americas, February 5, 2015; Marguerite Cawley, "Mexico Victims' Survey Highlights Under-Reporting of Crime," InSight Crime: Organized Crime in the Americas, October 1, 2014.

144.

Morris Panner, "Latin American Organized Crime's New Business Model," ReVista, vol. XI, no. 2 (Winter 2012). The author comments, "the business is moving away from monolithic cartels toward a series of mercury-like mini-cartels. Whether diversification is a growth strategy or a survival strategy in the face of shifting narcotics consumption patterns, it is clear that organized crime is pursuing a larger, more extensive agenda."

145.

See for example, Eric L. Olson and Miguel R. Salazar, A Profile of Mexico's Major Organized Crime Groups, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, February 17, 2011.

146.

Often kidnapping and extortion are a mechanism to collect payment for drug deliveries, for example. Weapons trafficking and money laundering are obviously closely tied to drug trafficking. DEA officials suggested in an interview that about 80% of the DTOs income may come from drugs, and they continue to use "DTO" or "cartel" to identify the organizations. CRS interview with DEA officials on August 5, 2011.

147.

Samuel Logan and James Bosworth, Beyond 2012, Southern Pulse, 2012, http://www.southernpulse.com.

148.

Eduardo Guerrero-Gutiérrez, who now heads the firm Lantia Consulting (Lantia Consultores) in Mexico, provided this graphic to CRS.