< Back to Current Version

Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response: The SAFER Grant Program

Changes from April 10, 2013 to May 7, 2013

This page shows textual changes in the document between the two versions indicated in the dates above. Textual matter removed in the later version is indicated with red strikethrough and textual matter added in the later version is indicated with blue.


Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response: The SAFER Grant Program Lennard G. Kruger Specialist in Science and Technology Policy April 10May 7, 2013 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL33375 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response: The SAFER Grant Program Summary In response to concerns over the adequacy of firefighter staffing, the Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response Act, known as the SAFER Act, was enacted by the 108th Congress as Section 1057 of the FY2004 National Defense Authorization Act (P.L. 108-136). The SAFER Act authorizes grants to career, volunteer, and combination local fire departments for the purpose of increasing the number of firefighters to help communities meet industry-minimum standards and attain 24-hour staffing to provide adequate protection from fire and fire-related hazards. Also authorized are grants to volunteer fire departments for recruitment and retention of volunteers. SAFER is administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). With the economic turndown adversely affecting budgets of local governments, concerns arose that modifications to the SAFER statute may be necessary to enable fire departments to more effectively and affordably participate in the program. Since FY2009, annual appropriations bills have contained provisions that waive certain provisions of the SAFER statute. These provisions included the length of the grant, maintenance of expenditure requirements, local matching requirements, and grant caps. The waivers served to reduce the financial obligation on SAFER grant recipients, and allowed SAFER grants to be used to rehire laid-off firefighters and to fill positions lost through attrition. The 112th Congress enacted the Fire Grants Reauthorization Act of 2012 (P.L. 112-239), which reauthorized SAFER through FY2017; altered the grant distribution formula among career, volunteer, combination, and paid-on-call fire departments; raised available funding for higher population areas; and addressed waiver issues previously addressed in annual appropriations legislation. The Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013 (P.L. 113-6) funds SAFER and AFG at $337 million each. Additionally, SAFER and AFG are subject to sequestration. Both programs are part of FEMA’s State and Local Programs budget account, which is subject to a 5.0% cut. According to the Congressional Fire Service Institute, SAFER and AFG are expected to be cut by 5%, which yields FY2013 budget levels of $320 million for SAFER and $320 million for AFGDHS, the post-sequester FY2013 budget level for SAFER and AFG is $320.92 million for AFG and $320.92 million for SAFER. However, the amount of grant money available for SAFER and AFG is expected to be virtually unchanged from FY2012, because appropriations language provides that administrative costs are to be derived from the FEMA Salaries and Expense account. The Administration’s FY2014 budget proposes $670 million for firefighter assistance, including $335 million for SAFER and $335 million for AFG. Funding for management and administration would be drawn from a separate FEMA account (Salaries and Expenses). The 113th Congress will likely consider FY2014 and FY2015 budget appropriations for SAFER. As is the case with many federal programs, concerns over the federal budget deficit could impact budget levels. At the same time, firefighter assistance budgets will likely receive heightened scrutiny from the fire community, given the local budgetary cutbacks that many fire departments are now facing. The 113th Congress will also likely examine the impact of new SAFER hiring grant guidelines mandated by P.L. 112-239, the Fire Grants Reauthorization Act of 2012. The continuing issue is how effectively grants are being distributed and used to protect the health and safety of the public and firefighting personnel against fire and fire-related hazards. Congressional Research Service Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response: The SAFER Grant Program Congressional Research Service Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response: The SAFER Grant Program Contents Background and Genesis of SAFER ................................................................................................ 1 The SAFER Act ............................................................................................................................... 2 SAFER Reauthorization .................................................................................................................. 2 Appropriations ................................................................................................................................. 4 FY2012 ...................................................................................................................................... 5 FY2013 ...................................................................................................................................... 6 FY2014 ...................................................................................................................................... 7 SAFER Provisions in Jobs Legislation ...................................................................................... 7 Waiver of SAFER Requirements ..................................................................................................... 8 Implementation of the SAFER Program .......................................................................................... 9 Issues in the 113th Congress ............................................................................................................. 9 Tables Table 1. Key SAFER Provisions of Fire Grant Reauthorization ..................................................... 3 Table 2. Appropriations for Firefighter Assistance, FY2001-FY2013............................................. 4 Table 3. Recent and Proposed Appropriations for Firefighter Assistance ....................................... 5 Table 4. State-by-State Distribution of SAFER Grants, FY2005-FY2011 ..................................... 9 Contacts Author Contact Information........................................................................................................... 11 Congressional Research Service Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response: The SAFER Grant Program Background and Genesis of SAFER Firefighting and the provision of fire protection services to the public is traditionally a local responsibility, funded primarily by state, county, and municipal governments. During the 1990s, however, shortfalls in state and local budgets—coupled with increased responsibilities (i.e., counterterrorism) of local fire departments—led many in the fire community to call for additional financial support from the federal government. Since enactment of the FIRE Act1 in the 106th Congress, the Assistance to Firefighters Grants (AFG) program (also known as “fire grants” and “FIRE Act grants”) has provided funding for equipment and training directly from the federal government to local fire departments.2 Since the fire grant program commenced in FY2001, funding has been used by fire departments to purchase firefighting equipment, personal protective equipment, and firefighting vehicles. Many in the fire-service community argued that notwithstanding the fire grant program, there remained a pressing need for an additional federal grant program to assist fire departments in the hiring of firefighters and the recruitment and retention of volunteer firefighters. They asserted that without federal assistance, many local fire departments would continue to be unable to meet national consensus standards for minimum staffing levels, which specify at least four firefighters per responding fire vehicle (or five or six firefighters in hazardous or high-risk areas).3 Fireservice advocates also pointed to the Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) program4 as a compelling precedent of federal assistance for the hiring of local public safety personnel. In support of SAFER, fire-service advocates cited studies performed by the U.S. Fire Administration and the National Fire Protection Association,5 the Boston Globe,6 and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)7 which concluded that many fire departments fall below minimum standards for personnel levels. According to these studies, the result of this shortfall can lead to inadequate response to different types of emergency incidents, substandard response times, and an increased risk of firefighter fatalities. 1 Title XVII of the FY2001 Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act (P.L. 106-398). For more information, see CRS Report RL32341, Assistance to Firefighters Program: Distribution of Fire Grant Funding, by Lennard G. Kruger. 3 These refer to consensus standards developed by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA): NFPA 1710 (“Standard for the Organization and Deployment of Fire Suppression Operations, Emergency Medical Operations, and Special Operations to the Public by Career Fire Departments”), and NFPA 1720 (“Standard for the Organization and Deployment of Fire Suppression Operations, Emergency Medical Operations, and Special Operations to the Public by Volunteer Fire Departments”). NFPA standards are voluntary unless adopted as law by governments at the local, state, or federal level, and are also often considered by insurance companies when establishing rates. Another applicable standard to this debate is the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standard on respiratory protection in structural firefighting situations (29 CFR 1910.134(g)), which requires at least four firefighters (two in and two for backup) before entering a hazardous environment wearing a Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus. 4 For more information on the COPS program, see CRS Report RL33308, Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS): Background and Funding, by Nathan James. 5 National Fire Protection Association, Third Needs Assessment of the U.S. Fire Service, June 2011, available at http://www.nfpa.org/assets/files//2011NeedsAssessment.pdf. 6 Dedman, Bill, “Deadly Delays: The Decline of Fire Response,” Boston Globe Special Report, January 30, 2005. Available at http://www.boston.com/news/specials/fires/. 7 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, “National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Fire Fighter Fatality Investigation and Prevention Program, 1998 - 2005,” March 2006, 16 p. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/fire/pdfs/progress.pdf. 2 Congressional Research Service 1 Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response: The SAFER Grant Program On the other hand, those opposed to SAFER grants have contended that funding for basic local government functions—such as paying for firefighter salaries—should not be assumed by the federal government, particularly at a time of high budget deficits. Also, some SAFER opponents disagree that below-standard levels in firefighting personnel are necessarily problematic, and point to statistics indicating that the number of structural fires in the United States has continued to decline over the past 20 years.8 The SAFER Act In response to concerns over the adequacy of firefighter staffing, the Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response Act—popularly called the “SAFER Act”—was introduced into the 107th and 108th Congresses.9 The 108th Congress enacted the SAFER Act as Section 1057 of the FY2004 National Defense Authorization Act (P.L. 108-136; signed into law November 24, 2003). The SAFER provision was added as an amendment to S. 1050 on the Senate floor (S.Amdt. 785, sponsored by Senator Dodd) and modified in the FY2004 Defense Authorization conference report (H.Rept. 108-354). The SAFER grant program is codified as Section 34 of the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974 (15 U.S.C. 2229a). The SAFER Act authorizes grants to career, volunteer, and combination fire departments for the purpose of increasing the number of firefighters to help communities meet industry-minimum standards and attain 24-hour staffing to provide adequate protection from fire and fire-related hazards. Also authorized are grants to volunteer fire departments for activities related to the recruitment and retention of volunteers. SAFER Reauthorization On January 2, 2013, the President signed P.L. 112-239, the FY2013 National Defense Authorization Act. Title XVIII, Subtitle A is the Fire Grants Reauthorization Act of 2012, which significantly amends the SAFER statute (15 U.S.C. 2229a) and authorizes the SAFER program through FY2017. Table 1 provides a summary of key SAFER provisions in the 2012 reauthorization, and provides a comparison with the previous version of the SAFER statute. Two types of grants are authorized by the SAFER Act: hiring grants and recruitment and retention grants. Hiring grants cover a three-year term and are cost shared with the local jurisdiction. According to the amended statute, the federal share shall not exceed 75% in the first year of the grant, 75% in the second year, and 35% in the third year. While the majority of hiring grants will be awarded to career and combination fire departments, the SAFER Act specifies that 10% of the total SAFER appropriation be awarded to volunteer or majority-volunteer departments for the hiring of personnel. 8 See Lehrer, Eli, “Do We Need More Firefighters?” Weekly Standard, April 12, 2004, p. 21-22. Available at http://www.sipr.org/default.aspx?action=PublicationDetails&id=44. See also Easterbrook, Gregg, “Where’s the Fire?” New Republic Online, August 9, 2004. Available at http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=express&s=easterbrook080904. 9 107th Congress: S. 1617 (Dodd), H.R. 3992 (Boehlert), H.R. 3185 (Green, Gene). 108th Congress: S. 544 (Dodd), H.R. 1118 (Boehlert). Congressional Research Service 2 Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response: The SAFER Grant Program Additionally, at least 10% of the total SAFER appropriation is set aside for recruitment and retention grants, which are available to volunteer and combination fire departments for activities related to the recruitment and retention of volunteer firefighters. Also eligible for recruitment and retention grants are local and statewide organizations that represent the interests of volunteer firefighters. No local cost sharing is required for recruitment and retention grants. Table 1. Key SAFER Provisions of Fire Grant Reauthorization Previous Statute (15 U.S.C. 2229a) Fire Grant Reauthorization Act of 2012 (Title XVIII of P.L. 112-239) grant period is 4 years, grantees are required to retain for at least 1 year beyond the termination of their grants those firefighter positions hired under the grant shortens the grant period to three years, with no requirement that fire departments must retain SAFER funded firefighters for an extra year year 1—10% local match year 2—20% local match year 3—50% local match year 4—70% local match year 1—25% local match year 2—25% local match year 3—65% local match total funding over 4 years for hiring a firefighter may not exceed $100K, adjusted annually for inflation for the first year, the amount of funding provided for hiring a firefighter may not exceed 75% of the usual annual cost of a first-year firefighter in that department at the time the grant application was submitted for the second year, the amount of funding provided for hiring a firefighter may not exceed 75% of the usual annual cost of a first-year firefighter in that department at the time the grant application was submitted for the third year, the amount of funding provided for hiring a firefighter may not exceed 35% of the usual annual cost of a first-year firefighter in that department at the time the grant application was submitted state, local, and Indian tribal governments eligible for recruitment and retention funds additionally makes national organizations eligible for recruitment and retention funds no provision for economic hardship waivers allows FEMA, in the case of economic hardship, to waive cost share requirements, as well as the prohibition on supplanting local funds and maintenance of expenditure requirements (which would allow grants to be used for retention and rehiring laid-off firefighters) authorized for 7 years starting at $1 billion in FY2004, ending at $1.194 billion in FY2010 reauthorizes the SAFER grant program at $750 million for FY2013; for each of FY2014-FY2017, an amount equal to the amount authorized the previous fiscal year, increased by the percentage by which the Consumer Price Index for the previous fiscal year exceeds the preceding year no provision on congressionally directed spending no funds may be used for any congressionally directed spending item (as defined under the rules of the Senate and the House of Representatives) authority to make grants shall lapse 10 years from November 24, 2003 the authority to award assistance and grants shall expire five years after the date of enactment Source: Fire Grants Reauthorization Act of 2012, Title VIII, Subtitle A of FY2013 National Defense Authorization Act, P.L. 112-239. Congressional Research Service 3 Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response: The SAFER Grant Program P.L. 112-239 mandates studies and reports on the effectiveness of the SAFER grant program. Specifically: • FEMA is directed to develop a performance assessment system to evaluate SAFER (as well as AFG) grants. Not later than September 30, 2014, FEMA shall submit a report to Congress concerning the effectiveness of SAFER grants. • The Comptroller General is directed to submit a report to Congress assessing the effect of the amendments to the SAFER statute made by the Fire Grants Reauthorization of 2012. Appropriations The SAFER grant program receives its annual appropriation through the House and Senate Appropriations Subcommittees on Homeland Security. Within the appropriations bills, SAFER is listed under the line item, “Firefighter Assistance Grants,” which is located in Title III— Protection, Preparedness, Response, and Recovery. “Firefighter Assistance Grants” also includes the Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program. Although authorized for FY2004, SAFER did not receive an appropriation in FY2004. Table 2 shows the appropriations history for firefighter assistance, including SAFER, AFG, and the Fire Station Construction Grants (SCG) grants provided in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). Table 3 shows recent and proposed appropriated funding for the SAFER and AFG grant programs. Table 2. Appropriations for Firefighter Assistance, FY2001-FY2013 AFG SAFER SCGa Total FY2001 $100 million $100 million FY2002 $360 million $360 million FY2003 $745 million $745 million FY2004 $746 million $746 million FY2005 $650 million $65 million $715 million FY2006 $539 million $109 million $648 million FY2007 $547 million $115 million $662 million FY2008 $560 million $190 million $750 million FY2009 $565 million $210 million FY2010 $390 million $420 million $810 million FY2011 $405 million $405 million $810 million FY2012 $337.5 million $337.5 million $675 million FY2013b $320FY2013 $321 million $320321 million $679642 million Total $6.26326 billion $2.17017 billion a. $210 million $210 million $985 million $8.64564 billion a. Assistance to Firefighters Fire Station Construction Grants (SCG) grants were funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (P.L. 111-5). b. Post-sequester level as estimated by the Congressional Fire Service Institute. Congressional Research Service 4 Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response: The SAFER Grant Program Table 3. Recent and Proposed Appropriations for Firefighter Assistance (millions of dollars) a. FY2011 (Admin. request) FY2011 (P.L. 112-10) FY2012 (Admin. request) FY2012 (P.L. 112-74) FY2013 (Admin. request) FY2013 (P.L. 113-6) FY2014 (Admin. request) FIRE Grants (AFG) 305 405 250 337.5 335 320321 a 335 SAFER Grants 305 405 420 337.5 335 320321 a 335 Total 610 810 670 675 670 640642 a 670 Post- sequester level as estimated by the Congressional Fire Service Instituteaccording to U.S. Department of Homeland Security Fiscal Year 2013 Post-Sequestration Operating Plan. FY2012 The Administration’s FY2012 budget proposed $670 million for firefighter assistance, including $420 million for SAFER and $250 million for AFG. According to the FY2012 budget proposal, the request would fund 2,200 firefighter positions and approximately 5000 AFG grants. The Department of Homeland Security Appropriations, 2012, bill (H.R. 2017) was reported by the House Appropriations Committee on May 26, 2011. The House bill, as reported by the committee, would have provided $350 million for firefighter assistance, including $150 million for SAFER and $200 million for AFG. These FY2012 levels would have constituted a 63% cut for SAFER and a 51% cut for AFG compared to the FY2011 appropriation. There was no SAFER waiver language in the committee-approved bill. The House Appropriations bill report (H.Rept. 112-91) urged DHS to review the costs associated with the SAFER program, noting that “the cost per fighter is extremely high,” and that “the budget requests $405 million to enable the hiring of more than 2,200 firefighter positions, or $184,000 per fire-fighter.” H.Rept. 112-91 also directed FEMA to continue granting funds directly to local fire departments and to include the United States Fire Administration during the grant decision process. During the House floor consideration of H.R. 2017, two firefighter assistance amendments were adopted. The first amendment (offered by Representative LaTourette and Representative Pascrell, and agreed to by a recorded vote of 333-87) raised FY2012 funding levels to $335 million for AFG and $335 million for SAFER. The total level for firefighter assistance ($670 million) is equal to the level requested by the Administration. The second amendment (offered by Representative Price of North Carolina and agreed to by a recorded vote of 264-157) prohibited enforcement of various SAFER requirements for grantees. These waivers would allow FY2012 SAFER grants to be used to rehire laid-off firefighters and fill positions eliminated through attrition, remove cost-share requirements, allow grants to extend longer than the current five year duration, and permit the amount of funding per position at levels exceeding the current limit of $100,000. Congressional Research Service 5 Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response: The SAFER Grant Program The Department of Homeland Security Appropriations, 2012, bill (H.R. 2017) was passed by the House on June 2, 2011. Congressional Research Service 5 Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response: The SAFER Grant Program On September 7, 2011, the Senate Appropriations Committee approved $750 million for firefighter assistance in FY2012 (S.Rept. 112-74), which is a 12% increase over the House-passed level. The total included $375 million for SAFER and $375 million for AFG. As does the House bill, the Senate bill also waived or prohibited SAFER requirements in FY2012. The committee included a provision (§559) which allows SAFER grants to be used to retain firefighters and prohibits or waives SAFER limitations and restrictions. The committee stated its expectation that this provision would be applied in the same manner as similar provisions in the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009, and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 for fiscal years 2009 and 2010. P.L. 112-74, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, FY2012, provided $337.5 million for SAFER, and included language permitting FY2012 grants to be used to rehire laid-off firefighters and fill positions eliminated through attrition, as well as prohibiting DHS from enforcing the other SAFER restrictions and limitations. P.L. 112-74 also reinstated DHS waiver authority for the restrictions that were not lifted in the FY2011 appropriations bill (P.L. 112-10). FY2013 The Administration’s FY2013 budget proposed $670 million for firefighter assistance, including $335 million for SAFER and $335 million for AFG. The Administration requested that all previous SAFER waivers again be enacted for FY2013. The Administration has estimated that the requested SAFER budget would fund more than 1700 firefighter positions in FY2013.10 Also, in the budget proposal, FEMA strongly encouraged applying fire departments to seek, recruit, and hire post-9/11 veterans to increase their ranks within their department in order to take advantage of the provisions of the VOW To Hire Heroes Act of 2011 (Title II of P.L. 112-56). In FY2013, according to the budget proposal, “FEMA anticipates a preference for all SAFER applicants to have a policy in place addressing their intent to implement strategies to support this Act and have recruiting efforts aimed at post-9/11 veterans.” On May 16, 2012, the House Appropriations Committee approved its version of the FY2013 Department of Homeland Security appropriations bill. The committee mark is identical to the Administration requested level—$335 million for SAFER and $335 million for AFG. By voice vote, the full committee adopted an amendment during the committee markup specifying that SAFER restrictions will not apply to the FY2013 SAFER grants. The committee report (H.Rept. 112-492) stated that the committee “is perplexed” as to why FEMA has not already given preference to post-9/11 veterans for SAFER hiring grants, and directed FEMA to report to the committee quarterly on implementation efforts on the hiring of veterans, including the number of hirings. Meanwhile, H.R. 6455, the Veterans Jobs Corps Act of 2012 (introduced September 20, 2012) would direct DHS to award SAFER grants to hire veterans as firefighters. 10 Testimony of the Honorable Janet Napolitano, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, before the Senate Subcommittee on Homeland Security Appropriations, March 8, 2012. Congressional Research Service 6 Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response: The SAFER Grant Program During floor action on June 6, 2012, an amendment was offered by Representative Runyan to increase funding for SAFER and AFG by $2.5 million each, taking its $5 million offset from the Office of the Under Secretary for Management. The amendment passed by voice vote, bringing 10 Testimony of the Honorable Janet Napolitano, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, before the Senate Subcommittee on Homeland Security Appropriations, March 8, 2012. Congressional Research Service 6 Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response: The SAFER Grant Program the firefighter assistance account to $675 million ($337.5 million for SAFER and $337.5 million for AFG), which is identical to the FY2012 level. H.R. 5855 was passed by the House on June 7, 2012. On May 22, 2012, the Senate Appropriations Committee approved $675 million for firefighter assistance for FY2013. This level included $337.5 million for SAFER and $337.5 million for AFG. The Senate level is identical to the FY2012 level. The Senate Committee bill (S. 3216) also included SAFER waiver authority language, including a provision which allows grants to be used to retain firefighters, instead of only for increasing the number of firefighters. The committee report (S.Rept. 112-169) directed DHS to continue the practice of funding applications according to local priorities and those established by the USFA, and to continue direct funding to fire departments and the peer review process. Regarding the SAFER waivers, the committee stated its expectation that DHS will take into consideration economic hardship when exercising the waiver authority. The Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013 (P.L. 113-6) funds SAFER and AFG at $337 million each (equal to the FY2012 level minus a 0.1% across-the-board reduction). Additionally, SAFER and AFG are subject to sequestration. Both programs are part of the State and Local Programs budget account within FEMA, which is subject to a 5.0% cut from the FY2013 level. According to the Congressional Fire Service InstituteDHS, SAFER and AFG are expected to be cut by 5%, which yields FY2013 budget levels of $320.92 million for SAFERAFG and $320.92 million for AFGSAFER.11 However, the amount of grant money available for SAFER and AFG is expected to be virtually unchanged from FY2012. This is because the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013 provides that administrative costs are to be derived from the FEMA Salaries and Expense account, rather than (as is typically the case) from a 5% carve-out from the firefighter assistance (SAFER and AFG) appropriations account. FY2014 The Administration’s FY2014 budget proposes $670 million for firefighter assistance, including $335 million for SAFER and $335 million for AFG. Funding for management and administration would be drawn from a separate FEMA account (Salaries and Expenses). The Firefighter Assistance Grants would be categorized under First Responder Assistance Programs (FRAP), one of three activities under FEMA’s State and Local Programs (SLP) appropriation. SAFER Provisions in Jobs Legislation During the 112th Congress, numerous bills were introduced (but not enacted) seeking to create public sector jobs; many contained provisions that would expand the SAFER grant program. These included the American Jobs Act (S. 1549/H.R. 12), the Emergency Jobs to Restore the American Dream Act (H.R. 2914), the Teachers and First Responders Back to Work Act of 2011 11 Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Department of Homeland Security Fiscal Year 2013 Post-Sequestration Operating Plan, April 26, 2013, p. 17. Congressional Research Service 7 Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response: The SAFER Grant Program (S. 1723), the Act for the 99% (H.R. 3638), the Rebuild America Act (H.R. 5727/S. 2252), the Veterans Job Corps Act of 2012 (H.R. 6455, H.R. 6563/S. 3457, S. 3429), and the Teachers and First Responders Back to Work Act of 2012 (H.R. 6561). 11 Congressional Fire Service Institute, “Congress Approves Fiscal Year 2013 Spending Measure,” March 21, 2013, available at http://www.cfsi.org/news/cfsiupdate.cfm?pr_ID=148. Congressional Research Service 7 Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response: The SAFER Grant Program Waiver of SAFER Requirements With the economic turndown adversely affecting budgets of local governments, concerns arose that modifications to the SAFER statute may be necessary to enable fire departments to more effectively participate in the program. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (P.L. 111-5) included a provision (§603) that waived the matching requirements for SAFER grants awarded in FY2009 and FY2010. Subsequently, the FY2009 Supplemental Appropriations Act (P.L. 111-32) included a provision (§605) giving the Secretary of Homeland Security authority to waive certain limitations and restrictions in the SAFER statute. For grants awarded in FY2009 and FY2010, waivers permitted grantees to use SAFER funds to rehire laid-off firefighters and fill positions eliminated through attrition, allow grants to extend longer than the five-year duration, and permit the amount of funding per position at levels exceeding the limit of $100,000. The Department of Defense and Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011 (P.L. 112-10) contained language that removed cost-share requirements and allowed SAFER grants to be used to rehire laid-off firefighters and fill positions eliminated through attrition. However, the law did not remove the requirement that SAFER grants fund a firefighter position for four years, with the fifth year funded wholly by the grant recipient. P.L. 112-10 also did not waive the cap of $100,000 per firefighter hired by a SAFER grant. According to fire service advocates, these unwaived SAFER requirements (the mandatory five-year position duration, the $100,000 cap) would be a disincentive for many communities to apply for SAFER grants, because localities would be reluctant to apply for grants that would require future expenditure of local funds.12 P.L. 112-74, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, FY2012, included language (§561) prohibiting using any funds to enforce all of the SAFER restrictions that have been lifted since FY2009. Additionally, Section 562 of P.L. 112-74 reinstated DHS waiver authority for the restrictions that were not lifted in the FY2011 appropriations bill (P.L. 112-10). Meanwhile, the SAFER reauthorization language in the Fire Grants Reauthorization Act of 2012 (P.L. 112-239) removed the $100,000 cap per firefighter hired, shortened the grant period from four to three years, removed the requirement to retain SAFER-hired firefighters for one year past the termination of federal grant support, and provided economic hardship waivers that will give DHS the authority to waive matching requirements and prohibitions on using SAFER funds for rehiring laid-off firefighters and filling positions eliminated through attrition. The Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013 (P.L. 113-6) continues to grant DHS waiver authority from SAFER requirements in FY2013. Specifically, DHS may waive cost sharing requirements, the three year grant term, cost limits per firefighter hired, and the prohibition on using SAFER funds for rehiring laid-off firefighters and filling positions eliminated through attrition. SAFER waiver authority is also requested in the Administration’s FY2014 budget proposal. 12 International Association of Fire Fighters, News Release, “Budget: Agreement Retains Level Funding for FIRE Act and SAFER grants, But Restricts Flexibility on SAFER Grants,” April 14, 2011, available at http://www.iaff.org/ 11News/041311Waivers.htm. Congressional Research Service 8 Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response: The SAFER Grant Program prohibition on using SAFER funds for rehiring laid-off firefighters and filling positions eliminated through attrition. SAFER waiver authority is also requested in the Administration’s FY2014 budget proposal. Implementation of the SAFER Program Prior to FY2007, the SAFER grant program was administered by the Office of Grants and Training within the Preparedness Directorate of DHS. However, Title VI of the Conference Agreement on the DHS appropriations bill (P.L. 109-295; H.Rept. 109-699), the Post Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act of 2006, transferred most of the existing Preparedness Directorate (including SAFER and fire grants) back to an enhanced FEMA. Table 4 shows the state-by-state distribution of SAFER grant funds, from FY2005 through FY2011. Of the total federal share requested for FY2009, 54.6% was requested by all paid/career departments, 9.3% by all volunteer, 14.7% by combination (majority paid/career), and 19% by combination (majority volunteer).13 Of the FY2011 SAFER awards, grants for hiring accounted for 90% of the total federal share awarded. For the latest information and updates on the application for and awarding of SAFER grants, see the official SAFER grant program website at http://www.fema.gov/firegrants/safer/index.shtm. Issues in the 113th Congress The 113th Congress will likely consider FY2014 and FY2015 budget appropriations for SAFER. As is the case with many federal programs, concerns over the federal budget deficit could impact budget levels. At the same time, firefighter assistance budgets will likely receive heightened scrutiny from the fire community, given the local budgetary cutbacks that many fire departments are now facing. The 113th Congress will also likely examine the impact of new SAFER hiring grant guidelines mandated by P.L. 112-239, the Fire Grants Reauthorization Act of 2012. The continuing issue is how effectively grants are being distributed and used to protect the health and safety of the public and firefighting personnel against fire and fire-related hazards. Table 4. State-by-State Distribution of SAFER Grants, FY2005-FY2011 (millions of dollars) FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 Total Alabama 1.611 6.215 4.236 7.314 4.288 8.531 1.293 33.488 Alaska 1.051 0.205 0.418 1.438 0.328 6.072 0.074 9.586 Arizona 1.560 3.559 4.428 6.613 6.768 10.357 2.809 36.094 Arkansas 0.394 1.820 0.377 3.834 0.976 2.206 1.136 10.743 California 5.221 5.212 4.259 4 .212 31.501 63.13 56.356 169.891 .212 31.501 63.13 56.356 169.891 13 Latest SAFER application statistics are available at http://www.fema.gov/firegrants/safer/statistics.shtm. Congressional Research Service 9 Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response: The SAFER Grant Program FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 Total Colorado 1.584 3.479 1.730 2.02 0.955 3.384 5.432 18.584 Connecticut 0.130 0.191 0.856 3.92 2.214 1.312 5.099 13.722 Delaware 13 0 0.135 0 0.398 0 1.723 0 2.256 Latest SAFER application statistics are available at http://www.fema.gov/firegrants/safer/statistics.shtm. Congressional Research Service 9 Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response: The SAFER Grant Program District of Columbia FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 District of Columbia 0 0.135 0 0 0 0.398 0 0 0 1.723 0 0 2.256 0 0 Florida 6.576 9.329 6.217 17.185 24.105 17.721 30.494 111.627 Georgia 5.354 2.085 2.842 17.438 4.844 10.384 1.273 44.22 Hawaii 0 0 0 1.626 0 0.1 0 1.726 Idaho 0.063 0.621 0.626 0.774 1.336 2.897 4.068 10.385 Illinois 1.340 4.463 9.933 5.85 2.496 10.848 2.456 37.386 0.099 2.687 4.577 8.295 9.931 4.587 30.176 Indiana 0 Iowa 0.169 0.144 0.980 1.288 1.045 0.081 1.604 5.311 Kansas 0.667 0.045 1.029 1.872 2.806 2.285 0.381 9.085 Kentucky 0.152 2.890 0.429 2.466 0.338 0.893 0.155 7.323 Louisiana 3.430 3.078 4.728 8.62 10.515 0.182 1.672 32.225 Maine 0.081 0.316 0.951 0.739 1.047 0.518 3.652 Maryland 0.096 1.862 1.526 3.171 4.429 2.145 4.299 17.528 Massachusetts 1.300 2.079 4.372 2.690 18.385 34.422 23.127 86.375 Michigan 1.759 0.592 0.628 13.286 22.493 47.646 86.404 Minnesota 0.300 1.089 0.375 3.246 1.256 0.789 4.463 11.518 Mississippi 0.756 0.594 0.115 1.608 1.209 0.488 4.77 Missouri 1.467 3.547 4.551 2.381 1.474 5.618 10.619 29.657 Montana 0.034 0.255 2.635 2.955 0.458 0.973 1.252 8.562 0.873 0.632 1.951 0.802 0.493 0.577 2.459 13.438 20.406 0.353 1.479 5.02 18.073 92.964 Nebraska 0 0 0 0 Nevada 1.500 1.714 0.632 0.086 New Hampshire 0.400 1.035 1.528 0.225 New Jersey 6.374 3.971 2.953 4.389 0.556 56.648 3.123 1.309 0.108 0.499 1.854 New Mexico 0 0 0 0 4.751 6.893 New York 1.540 2.991 2.845 4.412 8.227 18.239 6.142 44.396 North Carolina 2.155 5.533 5.371 18.183 2.256 6.375 5.833 45.706 1.518 1.517 2.139 0.048 5.831 29.606 21.04 18.654 78.492 9.127 1.435 14.721 North Dakota 0 0.609 0 Ohio 1.319 1.881 2.255 3.737 Oklahoma 0.147 0.699 0.531 2.782 Oregon 1.710 2.141 2.649 2.071 0.677 6.814 8.354 23.768 Pennsylvania 1.244 1.475 2.633 3.515 1.176 7.926 13.831 31.8 Rhode Island 0.400 1.561 4.249 3.108 9.423 South Carolina 0.456 0.863 3.218 8.158 2.41 2.064 2.147 19.316 South Dakota 0.063 0.311 0.211 0.552 0 0.648 0.255 2.04 Congressional Research Service 0 0.105 0 0 10 Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response: The SAFER Grant Program FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 Total Tennessee 2.700 2.719 3.683 1.856 1.148 7.374 0.993 20.473 Texas 0.951 10.961 8.779 19.06 3.158 12.65 2.881 58.44 Utah 0.900 3.312 2.098 3.955 1.824 4.583 0.208 16.88 Congressional Research Service 0 0.105 0 0 10 Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response: The SAFER Grant Program FY2005 Vermont 0 FY2006 FY2007 0.621 0.632 FY2008 0 FY2009 0.119 FY2010 0 FY2011 0 Total 0.621 0.632 Vermont 0 0 0.119 0 0 1.372 Virginia 2.091 3.554 0.782 1.849 4.891 8.995 4.978 27.14 Washington 2.298 2.897 7.340 9.476 2.847 13.779 16.139 54.776 0.287 0.398 West Virginia 0 0.187 0.681 0.16 Wisconsin 0 0.072 1.223 4.502 Wyoming 0 0 0.316 2.329 Puerto Rico 0 0 0 0 0 Northern Mariana Islands 0 0 0 0 0 Marshall Islands 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Guam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 American Samoa 0 0 0 0 0 0 Virgin Islands 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Republic of Palau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 61.356 105.142 113.665 203.964 0 0.263 207.258 0 1.713 0.12 3.101 9.018 0.997 1.148 5.053 0 1.404 410.833 0 0 0.474 0 1.404 0.474 334.03 1434.564 Source: Department of Homeland Security. Author Contact Information Lennard G. Kruger Specialist in Science and Technology Policy lkruger@crs.loc.gov, 7-7070 Congressional Research Service 11