Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and
Recent Legislation
Libby Perl, Coordinator
Specialist in Housing Policy
Erin Bagalman
Analyst in Health Policy
Adrienne L. Fernandes-Alcantara
Specialist in Social Policy
Elayne J. Heisler
Analyst in Health Services
Gail McCallion
Specialist in Social Policy
Francis X. McCarthy
Analyst in Emergency Management Policy
May 17, 2012
Congressional Research Service
7-5700
www.crs.gov
RL30442
CRS Report for Congress
Prepared for Members and Committees of CongressLisa N. Sacco
Analyst in Illicit Drugs and Crime Policy
February 3, 2014
Congressional Research Service
7-5700
www.crs.gov
RL30442
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
Summary
The causes of homelessness and determining how best to assist those who find themselves
homeless became particularly prominent, visible issues in the 1980s. The concept of
homelessness may seem like a straightforward one, with individuals and families who have no
place to live falling within the definition. However, the extent of homelessness in this country and
how best to address it depend upon how one defines the condition of being homeless.
There is no single federal definition of homelessness, although a number of programs, including
those overseen by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Department of
Veterans Affairs (VA), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and Department of Labor
(DOL) use the definition enacted as part of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (P.L.
100-77). The McKinney-Vento Act definition of a homeless individual was recently broadened as
part of
the Helping Families Save Their Homes Act of 2009 (P.L. 111-22). Previously, a homeless
individual was defined as a person who lacks a fixed nighttime residence and whose primary
nighttime residence is a supervised public or private shelter designed to provide temporary living
accommodations, a facility accommodating persons intended to be institutionalized, or a place not
intended to be used as a regular sleeping accommodation for human beings. The new law
expanded law expanded
the definition to include those defined as homeless under other federal programs, in
certain certain
circumstances, as well as those who will imminently lose housing. In the 112th Congress, a
bill that would further expand the McKinney-Vento Act definition, the Homeless Children and
Youth Act of 2011 (H.R. 32), has been approved by the House Financial Services Committee,
Subcommittee on Insurance, Housing and Community Opportunity.
A number of federal programs in seven different agencies, many originally authorized by the
McKinney-Vento Act, serve homeless persons. These include the Education for Homeless
Children and Youth program administered by the Department of Education (ED) and the
Emergency Food and Shelter program, a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
program run by the Department of Homeland Security. The Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) administers multiple programs that serve homeless individuals, including Health
Care for the Homeless, Projects for Assistance in Transition from Homelessness, and the
Runaway and Homeless Youth program.
HUD administers the Homeless Assistance Grants, made up of grant programs that provide
housing and services for homeless individuals ranging from emergency shelter to permanent
housing. The VA operates numerous programs that serve homeless veterans. These include Health
Care for Homeless Veterans and the Homeless Providers Grant and Per Diem program, as well as
a collaborative program with HUD called HUD-VASH, through which homeless veterans receive
Section 8 vouchers from HUD and supportive services through the VA. The Department of Labor
also operates a program for homeless veterans, the Homeless Veterans Reintegration Program.
This report describes the federal programs that are targeted to assist those who are homeless;
includes recent funding levels (see Table 1 and Table 2); discusses current issues, including
homelessness after the economic downturn and federal efforts to end homelessness; and provides
information on recent legislation. Among active legislation are bills to reauthorize the Violence
Against Women Act, which includes transitional housing for those who are homeless as a result
of domestic violence (S. 1925 and H.R. 4970) and legislation that would, among other things,
reauthorize the Education for Homeless Children and Youth program (H.R. 3989 and H.R. 3990The federal government, through the United States Interagency Council on Homelessness, has
established a goal of ending homelessness among various populations, including families, youth,
chronically homeless individuals, and veterans (the Department of Veterans Affairs also has its
own goal of ending veteran homelessness). Point-in-time counts of those experiencing
homelessness in 2013 indicate reductions among chronically homeless individuals, people in
families, and veterans compared to 2007, the year that the recession began.
Legislatively, the 113th Congress has seen enactment of the Violence Against Women
Reauthorization Act (P.L. 113-4), which, among other provisions, reauthorized the Department of
Justice transitional housing program, and two laws that reauthorized multiple homeless veterans
Congressional Research Service
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
programs, the Department of Veterans Affairs Expiring Authorities Act of 2013 (P.L. 113-37) and
the VA Expiring Authorities Extension Act of 2013 (P.L. 113-59).
Congressional Research Service
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
Contents
Introduction...................................................................................................................................... 1
The Federal Response to Homelessness .......................................................................................... 1
Defining Homelessness: Who Is Served .......................................................................................... 3
Federal Programs Targeted to Assist Homeless Individuals ............................................................ 7
Department of Education (ED) .................................................................................................. 87
Education for Homeless Children and Youths..................................................................... 87
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) ................................................................................ 98
Emergency Food and Shelter (EFS) Program ..................................................................... 98
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)................................................................... 9 10
Health Care for the Homeless (HCH) Program................................................................... 9 10
Projects for Assistance in Transition from Homelessness (PATH).................................... 10
Grants for the Benefit of Homeless Individuals ................................................................ 1110
Runaway and Homeless Youth Program ........................................................................... 1110
Department of Justice (DOJ) ................................................................................................... 13
Transitional Housing Assistance for Victims of Domestic Violence, Stalking, or
Sexual Assault ....................................Sexual Assault, Domestic
Violence, Dating Violence, and Stalking............................................................................ 13
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) ....................................................... 1413
Homeless Assistance Grants.............................................................................................. 1413
Department of Labor (DOL) ................................................................................................... 16
Homeless Veterans Reintegration Program ....................................................................... 16
Referral and Counseling Services: Veterans at Risk of Homelessness Who Are
Transitioning from Certain Institutions .......................................................................... 1716
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) ...................................................................................... 17
Health Care for Homeless Veterans (HCHV).................................................................... 1817
Homeless Providers Grant and Per Diem Program ........................................................... 1817
Domiciliary Care for Homeless Veterans (DCHV) ........................................................... 1918
Compensated Work Therapy Program .............................................................................. 1918
HUD VA Supported Housing (HUD-VASH) .................................................................... 2019
Supportive Services for Veteran Families ......................................................................... 2019
HUD and VA Homelessness Prevention Demonstration Program .................................... 2119
Other Activities for Homeless Veterans ............................................................................ 21
Social Security Administration (SSA)..................................................................................... 22
Current Issues ................................................................................................................................ 24
The Economic Downturn and Family Homelessness.............................................................. 24
Efforts to End Homelessness20
Social Security Administration (SSA) ..................................................................................... 21
Efforts to End Homelessness .................................................................................................................... 25 22
The Chronic Homelessness Initiative ................................................................................ 2623
The U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent
and End Homelessness ................................................................................................... 2824
The Department of Veterans Affairs Plan to End Homelessness....................................... 2925
Legislation in the 112th Congresses ............................................................................................... 29
Enacted Legislation ...................................... 26
Legislation Enacted in the 113th Congress.............................................................................. 29. 26
Active Legislation ..................................in the 113th Congress ................................................................................. 3026
Funding .......................................................................................................................................... 3127
Congressional Research Service
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
Tables
Table 1. Homelessness: Appropriations for Targeted Federal Programs, FY2005-FY2012FY2006-FY2014 .......... 3228
Table 2. Homelessness: Targeted VA Program Obligations, FY2004-FY2012FY2013 ............................. 3430
Contacts
Author Contact Information........................................................................................................... 3531
Key Policy Staff ............................................................................................................................. 3531
Congressional Research Service
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
Introduction
Federal assistance targeted to homeless individuals and families was largely nonexistent prior to
the mid-1980s. Although the Runaway and Homeless Youth program was enacted in 1974 as part
of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (P.L. 93-415), the first federal program
focused on assisting all homeless people, no matter their age, was the Emergency Food and
Shelter (EFS) program, established in March 1983 through an emergency jobs appropriation bill
(P.L. 98-8). The EFS program was and continues to be administered by the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) in the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to provide
emergency food and shelter to needy individuals.
In 1987, Congress enacted the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Act (P.L. 100-77),
which created a number of new programs to comprehensively address the needs of homeless
people, including food, shelter, health care, and education. The act was later renamed the
McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (P.L. 106-400) after its two prominent proponents—
Representatives Stewart B. McKinney and Bruce F. Vento. The programs authorized in
McKinney-Vento include the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Homeless
Assistance Grants, the Department of Labor (DOL) Homeless Veterans Reintegration Program,
the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Grants for the Benefit of Homeless
Individuals and Health Care for the Homeless, and the Department of Education (ED) Education
for Homeless Children and Youths program.
This report describes existing federal programs that provide targeted assistance to homeless
individuals and families (other federal programs may provide assistance to homeless individuals
but are not specifically designed to assist homeless persons). These include those programs listed
above, as well as others that Congress has created since the enactment of McKinney-Vento. In
addition, this report discusses current issues related to homelessness, including the recent
economic downturn and federal efforts to end homelessness. Finally, Table 1 at the end of this
this report shows funding levels for each of the ED, DHS, HHS, HUD, DOL, and Department of
Justice (DOJ) programs that assist homeless individuals. Table 2 shows funding levels for
VA programs.
The Federal Response to Homelessness
Homelessness in the United States has always existed, but it did not come to the public’s attention
as a national issue until the 1970s and 1980s, when the characteristics of the homeless population
and their living arrangements began to change. Throughout the early and middle part of the 20th
century, homelessness was typified by “skid rows”: areas with hotels and single-room occupancy
dwellings where transient single men lived.1 Skid rows were usually removed from the more
populated areas of cities, and it was uncommon for individuals to actually live on the streets.2
Beginning in the 1970s, however, the homeless population began to grow and become more
visible to the general public. According to studies from the time, homeless persons were no
longer almost exclusively single men, but included women with children; their median age was
younger; they were more racially diverse (in previous decades, the observed homeless population
1
Peter H. Rossi, Down and Out in America: The Origins of Homelessness (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press,
1989), pp. 20-21, 27-28.
2
Ibid., p. 34.
Congressional Research Service
1
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
younger; they were more racially diverse (in previous decades, the observed homeless population
was largely white); they were less likely to be employed (and therefore had lower incomes); they
were mentally ill in higher proportions than previously; and individuals who were abusing or had
abused drugs began to become more prevalent in the population.3
A number of reasons have been offered for the growth in the number of homeless persons and
their increasing visibility. Many cities demolished skid rows to make way for urban development,
leaving some residents without affordable housing options.4 Other possible factors contributing to
homelessness include the decreased availability of affordable housing generally, the reduced need
for seasonal unskilled labor, the reduced likelihood that relatives will accommodate homeless
family members, the decreased value of public benefits, and changed admissions standards at
mental hospitals.5 The increased visibility of homeless people was due, in part, to the
decriminalization of actions such as public drunkenness, loitering, and vagrancy.6
In the 1980s, Congress first responded to the growing prevalence of homelessness with several
separate grant programs designed to address the food and shelter needs of homeless individuals.
These programs included the Emergency Food and Shelter Program (P.L. 98-8), the Emergency
Shelter Grants Program (P.L. 99-591), and the Transitional Housing Demonstration Program (P.L.
99-591).7 In 1983, the first federal task force was created to provide information to local
governments and other parties on how to obtain surplus federal property that could be used for
providing shelter and other services for homeless persons.
Congress began to consider comprehensive legislation to address homelessness in 1986. On June
26, 1986, H.R. 5140 and S. 2608 were introduced as the Homeless Persons’ Survival Act to
provide an aid package for homeless persons. No further action was taken on either measure,
however. Later that same year, legislation containing Title I of the Homeless Persons’ Survival
Act—emergency relief provisions for shelter, food, mobile health care, and transitional housing—
was introduced as the Urgent Relief for the Homeless Act (H.R. 5710). The legislation passed
both houses of Congress in 1987 with large bipartisan majorities. The act was renamed the
Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Act after the death of its chief sponsor, Stewart B.
McKinney of Connecticut; it was renamed again on October 30, 2000, as the McKinney-Vento
Homeless Assistance Act after the death of another prominent sponsor, Bruce F. Vento of
Minnesota. In 1987, President Ronald Reagan signed the act into law (P.L. 100-77).
The original version of the McKinney-Vento Act consisted of 15 programs either created or
reauthorized by the act, providing an array of services for homeless persons and administered by
various federal agencies. The act also established the Interagency Council on Homelessness,
which is designed to provide guidance on the federal response to homelessness through the
coordination of the efforts of multiple federal agencies covered under the McKinney-Vento Act.
Since the enactment of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act, there have been some
legislative changes to programs and services provided under the act and new programs that target
3
Ibid., pp. 39-44.
Ibid., p. 33.
5
Ibid., pp. 181-194, 41. See also Martha Burt, Over the Edge: The Growth of Homelessness in the 1980s (New York:
Russell Sage Foundation, 1992), pp. 31-126.
6
Down and Out in America, p. 34; Over the Edge, p. 123.
7
All three programs were incorporated into the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act in 1987. (The Transitional
Housing Demonstration Program was renamed the Supportive Housing Demonstration Program.)
4
Congressional Research Service
2
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
homeless individuals have been created. Specific programs covered under the McKinney-Vento
Act, as well as other federal programs responding to homelessness, are discussed in this report.
Defining Homelessness: Who Is Served
There is no single federal definition of what it means to be homeless, and definitions among
federal programs that serve homeless individuals may vary to some degree. As a result, the
populations served through the federal programs described in this report may differ depending on
the program. The definition of “homeless individual” that was originally enacted in the
McKinney-Vento Act is used by a majority of programs to define what it means to be homeless.
The McKinney-Vento Act defined the term “homeless individual” for purposes of the programs
that were authorized through the law (see Section 103 of McKinney-Vento), though some
programs that were originally authorized through McKinney-Vento use their own, less restrictive
definitions.8 In 2009, the McKinney-Vento Act definition of homelessness was amended by the
Homeless Emergency Assistance and Rapid Transition to Housing (HEARTH) Act, enacted as
part of the Helping Families Save Their Homes Act (P.L. 111-22).
Programs that use the definition in Section 103 of the McKinney-Vento Act are HUD’s Homeless
Assistance Grants, FEMA’s Emergency Food and Shelter program, the VA homeless veterans
programs, and DOL’s Homeless Veterans Reintegration Program.9 (Throughout this section of the
report, the term “Section 103 definition” is used to refer to the original McKinney-Vento Act
definition of homelessness.)
This section describes the original McKinney-Vento Act Section 103 definition of homeless
individual, how the definition compares to those used in other programs, and how it has changed
under the HEARTH Act and HUD’s implementing regulations, and how a bill in the 112th
Congress, the Homeless Children and Youth Act of 2012 (H.R. 32), would further change the
definition.
Original McKinney-Vento Act Definition of Homelessness
The definition of the term “homeless individual” in Section 103 of McKinney-Vento remained the
same for years, defining a homeless individual as
[a]n individual who lacks a fixed, regular, and adequate nighttime residence; and a person
who has a nighttime residence that is (a) a supervised publicly or privately operated shelter
designed to provide temporary living accommodations (including welfare hotels, congregate
shelters, and transitional housing for the mentally ill); (b) an institution that provides a
temporary residence for individuals intended to be institutionalized; or (c) a public or private
place not designed for, nor ordinarily used as, a regular sleeping accommodation for human
beings.
This definition was sometimes described as requiring one to be literally homeless in order to meet
its requirements10—either living in emergency accommodations or having no place to stay. This
8
These include the Education for Homeless Children and Youths program and Health Care for the Homeless.
The definition of homeless veteran is a veteran who is homeless as defined by Section 103(a) of McKinney-Vento. 38
U.S.C. §2002(1).
This definition applies to VA programs for homeless veterans as well as the Homeless Veterans Reintegration Program.
9
Congressional Research Service
3
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
This definition was sometimes described as requiring one to be literally homeless in order to meet
its requirements10—either living in emergency accommodations or having no place to stay. This
Reintegration Program.
10
See, for example, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, The Third Annual Homeless Assessment
Report to Congress, July 2008, p. 2, footnote 5, http://www.hudhre.info/documents/
(continued...)
9
Congressional Research Service
3
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
contrasts with definitions used in some other federal programs, where a person may currently
have a place to live but is still considered to be homeless because the accommodation is
precarious or
temporary.
Definitions Under Other Federal Programs
Education for Homeless Children and Youths: Among the federal programs that have adopted
a definition of homelessness that differs from the Section 103 definition is theThe Department of
Education (ED) Education for Homeless Children and Youths program. The ED program defines
Education (ED) program
defines homeless children and youth in part by reference to the Section 103 definition of homeless
homeless individuals as those lacking a fixed, regular, and adequate nighttime residence.11 In
addition,
however, the ED program defines children and youth who are eligible for services to include
include those who are (1) sharing housing with other persons due to loss of housing or economic
hardship; (2) living in hotels or motels, trailer parks, or campgrounds due to lack of alternative
arrangements; (3) awaiting foster care placement; (4) living in substandard housing; and (5)
children of migrant workers.12
Transitional Housing Assistance for Victims of Domestic Violence, Stalking, or Sexual
Assault: The Violence Against Women Act definition of homelessness is similar to the ED
definition.13
Runaway and Homeless Youth: The statute defines a homeless youth as either ages 16 to 22 (for
transitional housing) or ages 18 and younger (for short-term shelter) and for whom it is not
possible to live in a safe environment with a relative or for whom there is no other safe alternative
living arrangement.14
Health Care for the Homeless: Under the Health Care for the Homeless program, a homeless
individual is one who “lacks housing,” and the definition includes those living in a private or
publicly operated temporary living facility or in transitional housing.15
Projects for Assistance in Transition from Homelessness: In the PATH program, an “eligible
homeless individual” is described as one suffering from serious mental illness, which may also be
accompanied by a substance use disorder, and who is “homeless or at imminent risk of becoming
homeless.” The statute does not further define what constitutes being homeless or at imminent
risk of homelessness, however.
10
See, for example, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, The Third Annual Homeless Assessment
Report to Congress, July 2008, p. 2, footnote 5, http://www.hudhre.info/documents/
3rdHomelessAssessmentReport.pdf.
11
42 U.S.C. §11434a.
12
Migratory children are defined at 20 U.S.C. §6399.
13
42 U.S.C. §14043e-2.
14
42 U.S.C. §5732a(3).
15
42 U.S.C. §254b(h)(5)(A).
Congressional Research Service
4
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
HEARTH Act Changes to the McKinney-Vento Act Section 103 Definition
The Section 103 definition of “homeless individual” was changed in 2009 as part of the Homeless
Emergency Assistance and Rapid Transition to Housing (HEARTH) Act, enacted as part of the
Helping Families Save Their Homes Act (P.L. 111-22). The HEARTH Act broadened the
McKinney-Vento Section 103 definition and moved the definition away from the requirement for
(...continued)
3rdHomelessAssessmentReport.pdf.
11
42 U.S.C. §11434a.
12
Migratory children are defined at 20 U.S.C. §6399.
13
42 U.S.C. §14043e-2.
14
42 U.S.C. §5732a(3).
15
42 U.S.C. §254b(h)(5)(A).
Congressional Research Service
4
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
literal homelessness. On December 5, 2011, HUD released regulations that clarify some of the
changes.16 The changes are as follows:
•
Amendments to Original McKinney-Vento Act Language: The HEARTH Act
made minor changes to the existing language in the McKinney-Vento Act. The
law continues to provide that a person is homeless if they lack “a fixed, regular,
and adequate nighttime residence,” and if their nighttime residence is a place not
meant for human habitation, if they live in a shelter, or if they are a person
leaving an institution who had been homeless prior to being institutionalized. The
HEARTH Act added that those living in hotels or motels paid for by a
government entity or charitable organization are considered homeless, and it
included all those persons living in transitional housing, not just those residing in
transitional housing for the mentally ill as in prior law. The amended law also
added circumstances that are not considered suitable places for people to sleep,
including cars, parks, abandoned buildings, bus or train stations, airports, and
campgrounds. When HUD issued its final regulation in December 2011, it
clarified that a person exiting an institution cannot have been residing there for
more than 90 days.17 In addition, where the law states that a person “who resided
in a shelter or place not meant for human habitation” prior to institutionalization,
the “shelter” means emergency shelter and does not include transitional
housing.18
•
Imminent Loss of Housing: P.L. 111-22 added to the Section 103 definition
those individuals and families who meet all of the following criteria:
•
They will “imminently lose their housing,” whether it be their own housing,
housing they are sharing with others, or a hotel or motel not paid for by a
government or charitable entity. Imminent loss of housing is evidenced by an
eviction requiring an individual or family to leave their housing within 14
days; a lack of resources that would allow an individual or family to remain
in a hotel or motel for more than 14 days; or credible evidence that an
individual or family would not be able to stay with another homeowner or
renter for more than 14 days.
•
They have no subsequent residence identified.
•
They lack the resources or support networks needed to obtain other
permanent housing.
16
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, “Homeless Emergency Assistance and Rapid Transition to
Housing: Defining ‘Homeless’,” 76 Federal Register 75994-76019, December 5, 2011.
17
Ibid., p. 76000.
18
Ibid.
Congressional Research Service
5
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
HUD practice prior to passage of the HEARTH Act was to consider those
individuals and families who would imminently lose housing within seven days
to be homeless.
•
Other Federal Definitions: P.L. 111-22 added to the definition of “homeless
individual” unaccompanied youth and homeless families with children who are
defined as homeless under other federal statutes. The law did not define the term
youth, so in its final regulations HUD defined a youth as someone under the age
16
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, “Homeless Emergency Assistance and Rapid Transition to
Housing: Defining ‘Homeless’,” 76 Federal Register 75994-76019, December 5, 2011.
17
Ibid., p. 76000.
18
Ibid.
Congressional Research Service
5
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
of 25.19 In addition, the HEARTH Act did not specify which other federal statutes
would be included in defining homeless families with children and
unaccompanied youth. So in its regulations, HUD listed seven federal programs
as those under which youth or families with children can be defined as homeless:
the Runaway and Homeless Youth program; Head Start; the Violence Against
Women Act; the Health Care for the Homeless program; the Supplemental
Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP); the Women, Infants, and Children
nutrition program; and the McKinney-Vento Education for Children and Youths
program.20 Five of these seven programs (all but Runaway and Homeless Youth
and Health Care for the Homeless programs) either share the Education for
Homeless Children and Youths definition, or use a very similar definition. Youth
and families who are defined as homeless under another federal program must
meet each of the following criteria:
•
They have experienced a long-term period without living independently in
permanent housing. In its final regulation, HUD defined “long-term period”
to mean at least 60 days.
•
They have experienced instability as evidenced by frequent moves during
this long-term period, defined by HUD to mean at least two moves during the
60 days prior to applying for assistance.21
•
The youth or families with children can be expected to continue in unstable
housing due to factors such as chronic disabilities, chronic physical health or
mental health conditions, substance addiction, histories of domestic violence
or childhood abuse, the presence of a child or youth with a disability, or
multiple barriers to employment. Under the final regulation, barriers to
employment may include the lack of a high school degree, illiteracy, lack of
English proficiency, a history of incarceration, or a history of unstable
employment.22
HUD Homeless Assistance Grant recipients will not be able to use more than
10% of grant funds to serve those individuals and families defined as homeless
under other federal statutes.23
•
Domestic Violence: Another change to the definition of homeless individual is
that the HEARTH Act considers homeless anyone who is fleeing a situation of
19
Ibid., p. 75996.
Ibid.
21
Ibid., p. 76017.
22
Ibid.
23
42 U.S.C. §11382(j).
20
Congressional Research Service
6
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
“domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, stalking, or other dangerous
or life-threatening conditions in the individual’s or family’s current housing
situation, including where the health and safety of children are jeopardized.”24
The law also provides that an individual must lack the resources or support
network to find another housing situation. The final regulation issued by HUD in
December 2011 specified that the conditions either must have occurred at the
primary nighttime residence or made the individual or family afraid to return to
their residence.25
Legislation in the 112th Congress Regarding the Definition of Homelessness
The Homeless Children and Youth Act of 2011 (H.R. 32) would further change the McKinneyVento Section 103 definition of homelessness, as amended by the HEARTH Act, to include
children and youth who are verified as homeless using the definitions of four other federal
programs. Specifically, youth verified as homeless under the Runaway and Homeless Youth
program, and children and their families verified as homeless under (1) the Education for
Homeless Children and Youths program, (2) programs funded through the Individuals with
Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), or (3) Head Start would meet the Section 103 definition of
homelessness. Note that both IDEA and Head Start refer to the Department of Education statute
to define “homeless children.”26
The proposed changes in H.R. 32 differ from HEARTH Act changes in that the verification of
homelessness under one of the four federal programs would be sufficient to qualify as homeless
under the McKinney-Vento Section 103 definition. Children and their families and youth would
not need to demonstrate housing instability, together with factors that would prevent achieving
housing stability, as is required under the HEARTH Act. Children or youth would be verified by
local education agency homeless liaisons (in the case of the ED program), and the directors of
Head Start, Runaway and Homeless Youth, and IDEA programs, or their designees
19
Ibid., p. 75996.
Ibid.
21
Ibid., p. 76017.
22
Ibid.
23
42 U.S.C. §11382(j).
24
42 U.S.C. §11302(b).
20
Congressional Research Service
6
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
primary nighttime residence or made the individual or family afraid to return to
their residence.25
Note that the domestic violence provision of the McKinney-Vento definition does not apply to
homeless veteran programs. The statutory definition of homeless veteran for VA and DOL
program eligibility refers only to Section 103(a) of the McKinney-Vento Act.26 The HEARTH Act
added Section 103(b), which refers to victims of domestic violence.
Federal Programs Targeted to Assist Homeless
Individuals
The following subsections describe each of the federal programs targeted to assist homeless
individuals, arranged by the agency administering the programs. Where relevant, there are
references to other CRS reports that go into more detail about the programs.
24
42 U.S.C. §11302(b).
76 Federal Register, p. 76014.
26
See 20 U.S.C. §1401 and 42 U.S.C. §9832.
25
Congressional Research Service
7
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
Department of Education (ED)
Education for Homeless Children and Youths
(42 U.S.C. §§11431-11435) This program was initially authorized under Title VII, Part B, of the
McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act; it provides assistance to state educational agencies
(SEAs) to ensure that all homeless children and youth have equal access to the same free,
appropriate public education, including public preschool education, that is provided to other
children and youth. Grants made by SEAs to local educational agencies (LEAs) under this
program must be used to facilitate the enrollment, attendance, and success in school of homeless
children and youth. The LEAs may use the funds for activities such as tutoring, supplemental
instruction, and referral services for homeless children and youth, as well as providing them with
medical, dental, mental, and other health services. In order to receive funds, each state must
submit a plan indicating how homeless children and youth will be identified, how assurances will
be put in place that homeless children will participate in federal, state, and local food programs if
eligible, and how the state will address such problems as transportation, immunization, residency
requirements, and the lack of birth certificates or school records.
Education for Homeless Children and Youth Program (EHCY) grants are allotted to SEAs in
proportion to grants made under Title I, Part A of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of
1965 (ESEA), except that no state can receive less than the greater of $150,000, 0.25% of the
total annual appropriation, or the amount received in FY2001 under this program. The
Department of Education must reserve 0.1% of the total appropriation in order to provide grants
to outlying areas (Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands). The department must also transfer 1.0% of the total appropriation to
the Department of the Interior for services to homeless children and youth provided by the
Bureau of Indian Education. States may reserve up to 25% of their Homeless Education program
25
76 Federal Register, p. 76014.
38 U.S.C. §2002. “The term “homeless veteran” means a veteran who is homeless (as that term is defined in section
103(a) of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act).”
26
Congressional Research Service
7
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
funding for state activities. Minimally funded states (defined as states that receive a Homeless
Education allocation in a fiscal year equal to 0.25% of total program funds for that fiscal year) are
permitted to reserve up to 50% of funding for state activities. States subsequently subgrant
remaining funds to LEAs competitively.
Not all LEAs receive EHCY grants. In school year (SY) 2009-2010, 3,0462011-2012, 3,531 LEAs, out of a total of
15,90616,064, received awards.27 Although only 19% percent 22% of LEAs received EHCY grants in SY20092010, SY2011-2012,
they enrolled 8068% of all homeless students in that year. All LEAs are required to report
data data
annually on the number of homeless students enrolled, regardless of whether or not they
receive a
McKinney-Vento Homeless Education grant. All data are reported based on a school
year. In SY2007-2008, 794,617 homeless students were reported enrolled in school; in SY20082009, 956,914 homeless students were reported enrolled; and in SY2009-2010, the number of
enrolled homeless students reported was 939,903. The total number of homeless students enrolled
increased by 21% between SY2007-2008 and SY2008-2009, but it declined by 2% between
SY2008-2009 and SY2009-2010. This decline was due in part to changes in data collection
procedures in California. If California were excluded from the total, there would have been an
increase of 11% in enrolled homeless students between SY2008-2009 and SY2009-2010. Four
states year. In
SY2011-2012, 43 states reported an increase in their enrollment of homeless students; 10 states
reported a decrease in their enrollment of homeless students. In SY2009-2010, 939,903 homeless
students were reported enrolled in school; in SY2010-2011, the number of enrolled homeless
students reported was 1,065,794; and in SY2011-2012, 1,168,354 homeless students were
reported enrolled. The total number of homeless students enrolled increased 13% between
SY2009-2010 and SY2010-2011, and 10% between SY2010-2011 and SY2011-2012. Four states
accounted for 43% of the total number of students enrolled in both LEAs with EHCY
subgrants subgrants
and those without in SY2009-2010SY2011-2012. Those states, and their percentages of total
homeless student
enrollment, were California (21.3%), New York (98.3%), Texas (8.51%), and Florida
(5%).
Congressional Research Service
8
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
(5.4%).
The most recent reauthorization of the ESEA, known as the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001
(P.L. 107-110), amended the program explicitly to prohibit states that receive McKinney-Vento
funds from segregating homeless students from non-homeless students, except for short periods
of time for health and safety emergencies or to provide temporary, special, supplementary
services.2728 EHCY was reauthorized through FY2007 as Title X, Part C of the No Child Left
Behind Act of 2001 (FY2008 with the automatic one-year extension provided by the General
Education Provisions Act).2829 The Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008, signed into law
on July 30, 2008 (P.L. 110-289), increased the authorization for EHCY from $70 million to $100
million for FY2009, and such sums as may be necessary for each subsequent fiscal year. (For
more information about the Education for Homeless Children and YouthYouths Program, see CRS
Report R42494, Education for Homeless Children and Youth: BackgroundProgram Overview and Legislation in the
112th Congress, ,
by Gail McCallion.)
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
Emergency Food and Shelter (EFS) Program
(42 U.S.C. §§11331-11352) The Emergency Food and Shelter program, the oldest federal
program serving all homeless populations,29 was established in March 1983 and is administered
30 was established in March 1983 and is administered
27
All data are reported based on a school year (SY). All data discussed in this section are from the Education for
Homeless Children and Youth Program: Data Collection Summary, National Center for Homeless Education, October,
2013.
28
An exception was made for four counties that operated separate schools for homeless students in FY2000 (San
Joaquin, Orange, and San Diego counties in California, and Maricopa County in Arizona), as long as (1) those separate
schools offer services that are comparable to local schools, and (2) homeless children are not required to attend them.
29
See Section 422 of the General Education Provisions Act, as amended by P.L. 103-382. 42 U.S.C. §1226a.
30
Another program, the Runaway and Homeless Youth Program, was enacted earlier than the Emergency Food and
Shelter Program (in 1974), but serves a specific population rather than all homeless persons generally.
Congressional Research Service
8
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), in the Department of Homeland
Security. The program allocates funds to local communities to fund homeless programs and
homelessness prevention services. The EFS program is governed by a National Board chaired by
FEMA and made up of representatives from the United Way Worldwide, the Salvation Army, the
National Council of Churches of Christ in the U.S.A., Catholic Charities U.S.A., United Jewish
Communities, and the American Red Cross. The National Board uses a formula comprised of
unemployment rates and poverty rates to determine which local jurisdictions (typically counties)
qualify for funds. Eligible local jurisdictions then convene a local board to determine which
organizations—nonprofits and government agencies—within their communities should receive
grants, and distribute their available funds accordingly.3031
Eligible expenses for which local organizations may use funds include items for food pantries
such as groceries, food vouchers, and transportation expenses related to the delivery of food;
items for mass shelters such as hot meals, transportation of clients to shelters or food service
providers, and toiletries; payments to prevent homelessness such as utility assistance, hotel or
motel lodging, rental or mortgage assistance, and first month’s rent; and local recipient
organization program expenses such as building maintenance or repair, and equipment purchases
up to $300.
The EFS program was established by the Temporary Emergency Food Assistance Act of 1983
(P.L. 98-8); in 1987 it was authorized under the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act. The
27
An exception was made for four counties that operated separate schools for homeless students in FY2000 (San
Joaquin, Orange, and San Diego counties in California, and Maricopa County in Arizona), as long as (1) those separate
schools offer services that are comparable to local schools, and (2) homeless children are not required to attend them.
28
See Section 422 of the General Education Provisions Act, as amended by P.L. 103-382. 42 U.S.C. §1226a.
29
Another program, the Runaway and Homeless Youth Program, was enacted earlier than the Emergency Food and
Shelter Program (in 1974), but serves a specific population rather than all homeless persons generally.
30
For more information about recipient jurisdictions, see the National Board website, http://efsp.unitedway.org/.
Congressional Research Service
9
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
authorization for the EFS program expired at the end of FY1994 (42 U.S.C. §11352), however it
continues to be funded through annual appropriations.authorization for the EFS program expired at the end of FY1994 (42 U.S.C. §11352), however it
continues to be funded through annual appropriations. (For more information about the
Emergency Food and Shelter Program, see CRS Report R42766, The Emergency Food and
Shelter National Board Program and Homeless Assistance, by Francis X. McCarthy.)
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
Health Care for the Homeless (HCH) Program
(42 U.S.C. §254b(h)) The Health Care for the Homeless (HCH) Program provides grants to
nonprofit, state, or local government entities to operate outpatient health centers for homeless
individuals. It is one of the four types of health centers authorized in Section 330 of the Public
Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. §§201 et. seq.). The HCH is the only federal program that focuses
on the health care needs of the homeless population. Centers funded under the HCH are required
to be community designed and operated and must provide primary health care and substance
abuse prevention and treatment services to homeless individuals. Centers may also provide
services to connect homeless individuals with support services such as emergency shelter and job
training and may provide care at mobile sites. Finally, the HCH program authorizes grants to fund
innovative programs that provide outreach and comprehensive primary health services to
homeless children and children at risk of homelessness. In 20102012, there were 2,438682 HCH sites that
provided care to 805,0694839,980 homeless individuals. The vast majority of these patients (overnearly 90%)
lived at or below the federal poverty level, and approximately 15% of the patients served were
under the age of 20.31 HCHs were permanently authorized in the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (P.L. 111-148). (For more information about health centers, see CRS Report
.32 HCHs were permanently authorized in the Patient
31
For more information about recipient jurisdictions, see the National Board website, http://efsp.unitedway.org/.
HRSA, Uniform Data System (UDS) Report, UDS, National Rollup Report, 2012, at http://bphc.hrsa.gov/uds/
datacenter.aspx?year=2012; and 2012 Health Center Data, Homeless Program Grantee Data at http://bphc.hrsa.gov/
uds/datacenter.aspx?fd=ho&year=2012.
32
Congressional Research Service
9
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
Protection and Affordable Care Act (P.L. 111-148, as amended). (For more information about
health centers, see CRS Report R42433, Federal Health Centers, by Elayne J. Heisler.)
Projects for Assistance in Transition from Homelessness (PATH)
(42 U.S.C. §290cc-21 through §290cc-35) Projects for Assistance in Transition from
Homelessness (PATH) is a formula grant program that distributes funds to states (including the 50
states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, American Samoa,
and the Northern Mariana Islands) to support local organizations providing services for people
with serious mental illness (including those with co-occurring substance use disorders) who are
homeless or at imminent risk of becoming homeless. Funds are distributed to states in amounts
proportional to their populations living in urbanized areas; the minimum allotment is $300,000
for each of the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, and $50,000 for each of the
other territories. States must provide matching funds of at least $1 for every $3 of federal funds.
Up to 20% of the federal payments may be used for housing-related assistance, including (but not
limited to) services to help individuals access housing, minor repairs, security deposits, and onetime rental payments to prevent eviction. Other services include (but are not limited to) outreach,
mental health and substance abuse treatment, case management, and job training. Administered
The PATH
program is administered by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration’s
(SAMHSA’s) Center for
Mental Health Services (within HHS), PATH grants currently support services in 483
communities.32.33 Authorization for the PATH
program expired at the end of FY2003; however, it
continues to be funded through annual appropriations.
31
HRSA, Uniform Data System (UDS) Report, UDS, National Rollup Report, 2010, at http://bphc.hrsa.gov/uds/doc/
2010/National_Universal.pdf; and National Total Summary Data at http://bphc.hrsa.gov/uds/view.aspx?year=2010.
32
SAMHSA, FY2013 Justification of Estimates for Appropriations Committees, p. 71, http://www.samhsa.gov/Budget/
(continued...)
Congressional Research Service
10
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
appropriations.
Grants for the Benefit of Homeless Individuals
(42 U.S.C. §290aa-5) Grants for the Benefit of Homeless Individuals (GBHI) is a competitive
grant program that supports services to homeless individuals with substance use disorders
(including those with co-occurring mental illness). Grants are awarded competitively to
community-based public or nonprofit entities for periods of up to five years. GBHI-funded
programs and services includinginclude substance abuse treatment, mental health services, wrap-around
services, immediate entry into treatment, outreach services, screening and diagnostic services,
staff training, case management, primary health services, job training, educational services, and
relevant housing services. Administered by theUnder the GBHI authority, SAMHSA’s Center for Substance Abuse
Treatment, GBHI funds have served 49,300 individuals; the currently active portfolio has served
over 13,500 individuals.33 administers two grant portfolios: Treatment Systems for Homeless and (in
collaboration with SAMHSA’s Center for Mental Health Services) Cooperative Agreements to
Benefit Homeless Individuals.34 Authorization for the GBHI program expired at the end of
FY2003;
however, it continues to be funded through annual appropriations.
Runaway and Homeless Youth Program
The Runaway and Homeless Youth Program is administered by the Family and Youth Services
Bureau (FYSB) within HHS’s Administration for Children and Families (ACF). The program was
established in 1974 and was most recently authorized by the Reconnecting Homeless Youth Act
of 2008 (P.L. 110-378). The law authorizes federal funding for three programs through FY2013:
33
For more about the PATH program, including state and federal data reports, see http://pathprogram.samhsa.gov/.
For more about GBHI, see SAMHSA, FY2014 Justification of Estimates for Appropriations Committees, pp. 149–
150, http://www.samhsa.gov/Budget/FY2014/SAMHSA_FY2014_CJ_FINAL.pdf.
34
Congressional Research Service
10
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
the Basic Center Program (BCP), Transitional Living Program (TLP), and Street Outreach
Program (SOP). These programs are designed to provide services to runaway and homeless youth
outside of the law enforcement, juvenile justice, child welfare, and mental health systems. The
funding streams for the Basic Center Program and Transitional Living Program were separate
until Congress consolidated them in 1999 (P.L. 106-71). Together, the two programs, along with
other program activities, are known as the Consolidated Runaway and Homeless Youth
Program.3435 Although the Street Outreach Program is a separately funded component, SOP
services are coordinated with those provided under the BCP and TLP. Grantees must provide at
least 10% of the funds to cover the total cost of the services provided under the three programs.
(For more information about the program, see CRS Report RL33785, Runaway and Homeless
Youth: Demographics and Programs, by Adrienne L. Fernandes-Alcantara.)
Basic Center Program
(42 U.S.C. §§5701-57515711-5714) The Basic Center Program is intended to provide short-term shelter and
services for youth under age 18 and their families through public and private community-based
centers. Youth eligible to receive BCP services include those youth who are at risk of running
away or becoming homeless (and who may live at home with their parents), or have already left
home, either voluntarily or involuntarily. These centers, which generally shelter as many as 20
youth for approximately two weeks, are located in areas that are frequented or easily reached by
(...continued)
FY2013/SAMHSAFY2013CJ.pdf.
33
Ibid., p. 129.
34
Other program activities include a national communications system for runaway youth and their families, logistical
support for grantee organizations, HHS’s National Clearinghouse on Families and Youth, demonstrations, and the
administration of the management information system that tracks data on runaway and homeless youth, known as
NEO-RHYMIS.
Congressional Research Service
11
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
runaway and homeless youth. The centers seek to reunite youth with their families, whenever
possible, or to locate appropriate alternative placements. The centers also provide food, clothing,
individual and family counseling, and health care referrals. Some centers serve homeless youth
ages 18 to 21 through street-based services, home-based services, and drug abuse education and
prevention services.
BCP grants are allocated by formula to each state, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, and
are then distributed by HHS on a competitive basis to community-based organizations. The
amount of BCP funding available to a jurisdiction is based on its proportion of the nation’s youth
under age 18, and under the law, each jurisdiction receives a minimum of $200,000. Separately,
each of the territories (U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, America Samoa, and the Northern Mariana
Islands) receives a minimum of $70,000 of the total appropriations.3536 Grantees are required to
establish relationships with law enforcement, health and mental health care, social service,
welfare, and school district systems to coordinate services.
Transitional Living Program
(42 U.S.C. §5714-1 through §5714-2) The Transitional Living Program provides longer-term
shelter and assistance for youth ages 16 through 22 (including pregnant and/or parenting youth)
who may leave their biological homes due to family conflict, or have left and are not expected to
return home. TLP grants are distributed competitively by HHS to community-based public and
private organizations. Each TLP grantee may shelter up to 20 youth at host family homes,
35
Other program activities include a national communications system for runaway youth and their families, logistical
support for grantee organizations, HHS’s National Clearinghouse on Families and Youth, demonstrations, and the
administration of the management information system that tracks data on runaway and homeless youth, known as
NEO-RHYMIS.
36
Prior the enactment of P.L. 110-378, states could receive a minimum of $100,000 and territories could receive a
minimum of $45,000.
Congressional Research Service
11
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
supervised apartments owned by a social service agency, or scattered-site apartments and singleoccupancy apartments rented directly with the assistance of the agency. Youth under age 18 may
remain at TLP projects for up to 540 days (18 months) or longer. Youth ages 16 through 22 may
remain in the program for a continuous period of 635 days (approximately 21 months) under
“exceptional circumstances.”3637 Youth receive several types of TLP services:
•
basic life-skills training, including consumer education, and instruction in
budgeting and housekeeping;
•
interpersonal skill-building;
•
educational preparation, such as GED courses and post-secondary training;
•
assistance in job preparation and attainment;
•
education and counseling on substance abuse; and
•
mental and physical health care services.
The 2003 amendments to the Runaway, Homeless, and Missing Children Protection Act (P.L.
108-96) provided (P.L. 108-96) to the Runaway and Homeless Youth program provided
statutory authority for TLP funds to be used for maternity group homes.
Grantees may and do use
TLP funds to directly serve unwed pregnant and parenting teens,
without a specific set-aside. These organizations provide youth with parenting skills, including
35
Prior the enactment of P.L. 110-378, states could receive a minimum of $100,000 and territories could receive a
minimum of $45,000.
36
This term means circumstances in which a youth would benefit to an unusual extent from additional time in the
program. A youth in a TLP who has not reached age 18 on the last day of the 635-day period may, in exceptional
circumstances and if otherwise qualified for the program, remain in the program until his or her 18th birthday.
Congressional Research Service
12
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
These organizations provide youth with parenting skills, including child development education,
family budgeting, health and nutrition, and other skills to promote
their well-being and the well-beingwellbeing of their children.
Street Outreach Program37Program38
(42 U.S.C. §5712d5714-41) Runaway and homeless youth living on the streets or in areas that increase
their risk of using drugs or being subjected to sexual abuse, prostitution, or sexual exploitation are
eligible to receive services through the Street Outreach Program. The program’s goal is to assist
youth in transitioning to safe and appropriate living arrangements. SOP services include outreach
and education, treatment, counseling, provision of information, and referrals to other social
service agencies. The Street Outreach Program is funded separately from the BCP and TLP, and is
authorized to receive such sums as may be necessary. Since FY1996, when funding for the Street
Outreach Program was established, community-based public and private organizations have been
eligible to apply for SOP grants. Grants are generally awarded for a three-year period. Applicants
may apply for a $100,000 grant each year for a maximum of $200,000 over that period. Most
youth contacted through the Street Outreach Program receive written materials about referral
services, health and hygiene products, and food and drink items.
Collaboration on the Prevention of Adolescent Dating Violence
The Family Violence Prevention and Services Act (FVPSA), Title III of the Child Abuse
Amendments of 1984 (P.L. 98-457), authorized funds for Family Violence Prevention and Service
grants that work to prevent family violence, improve service delivery to address family violence,
and increase knowledge and understanding of family violence. Some of these projects focus on
runaway and homeless youth in dating violence situations through HHS’s Domestic
Violence/Runaway and Homeless Youth Collaboration on the Prevention of Adolescent Dating
Violence initiative. The initiative was created because many runaway and homeless youth come
from homes where domestic violence occurs and may be at risk of abusing their partners or
becoming victims of abuse.38 The initiative funds projects carried out by faith-based and
charitable organizations that advocate or provide direct services to runaway and homeless youth
or victims of domestic violence. The grants fund training for staff at these organizations to enable
them to assist youth in preventing dating violence. Eight projects are funded at $75,000 annually,
for FY2008 through FY2010, the most recent funding cycle.
Department of Justice (DOJ)
Transitional Housing Assistance for Victims of Domestic Violence, Stalking,
or Sexual Assault
(42 U.S.C. §13975) The 108th Congress passed the Prosecutorial Remedies and Other Tools to
End the Exploitation of Children Today Act of 2003 (the PROTECT Act, P.L. 108-21), which
37
This program is also known as the Education and Prevention Services to Reduce Sexual Abuse of Runaway,
Homeless, and Street Youth Program.
38
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Domestic Violence/Runaway and Homeless Youth Collaboration
on the Prevention of Adolescent Dating Violence Grant Announcement, April 24, 2007, http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/
open/HHS-2007-ACF-ACYF-EV-0103.html.
Congressional Research Service
13
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
contained the Transitional Housing Assistance for Victims of Domestic Violence, Stalking, or
Sexual Assault program, and authorized it at $30 million per year through FY2008. Most recently,
the Violence Against Women and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act of 2005 (P.L. 109162) increased the authorized funding level for the transitional housing program, authorizing $40
million through FY2011. For more information about the Violence Against Women Act, see CRS
Report R42499, The Violence Against Women Act: Overview, Legislation, and Federal Funding,
by Lisa M. Seghetti and Jerome P. Bjelopera.
The PROTECT Act authorizes the Attorney General to provide grants to states, units of local
governments, Indian tribes, and nonprofit organizations to assist eligible adults, minors, and their
dependents who are fleeing domestic violence, or for whom emergency shelter services are
lacking. Under the act, eligible adults, minors, and their dependents may be assisted with
transitional housing, short-term housing assistance such as help with rent and utility payments,
and supportive services, including help in finding and maintaining permanent housing. Grants
may be used to help eligible persons with temporary housing for a maximum of 24 months. At
least 7% of the total appropriation in any fiscal year for this program must be allocated to tribal
organizations serving victims of domestic and dating violence, stalking, or sexual assault. For
FY2005 through FY2011, Congress appropriated funding for the program through a set-aside
from the STOP (Services, Training, Officers, and Prosecutors) grant. For FY2012, Congress
appropriated and increased funding for the program separate from the STOP grant as part of the
Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act (P.L. 112-55).37
”Exceptional circumstances” means in which a youth would benefit to an unusual extent from additional time in the
program. A youth in a TLP who has not reached age 18 on the last day of the 635-day period may, in exceptional
circumstances and if otherwise qualified for the program, remain in the program until his or her 18th birthday.
38
This program is known in the statute as Sexual Abuse Prevention Program. HHS refers to it as both the Street
Outreach Program (in grant anouncements and on their website) and as the Service Connection for Youth on the Streets
Program (in the budget request).
Congressional Research Service
12
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
Department of Justice (DOJ)
Transitional Housing Assistance for Victims of Sexual Assault, Domestic
Violence, Dating Violence, and Stalking
The Transitional Housing Assistance Grants for Victims of Sexual Assault, Domestic Violence,
Dating Violence, and Stalking Program (Transitional Housing Program), administered by the
Office on Violence Against Women, funds programs that provide assistance to victims of sexual
assault, domestic violence, dating violence, and/or stalking who are in need of transitional
housing, short-term housing assistance, and related supportive services. Assistance may include
counseling, support groups, safety planning, and advocacy services as well as practical services
such as licensed child care, employment services, transportation vouchers, telephones, and
referrals to other agencies. Services are available to minors, adults, and their dependents.
The Transitional Housing Program was first authorized by the Prosecutorial Remedies and Other
Tools to End the Exploitation of Children Today Act of 2003 (the PROTECT Act, P.L. 108-21).
The PROTECT Act amended Subtitle B of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 (VAWA; 42
U.S.C. 13701 note; 108 Stat. 1925) to (1) establish this grant program to support states, units of
local government, Indian tribes, and other organizations and (2) authorize annual funding for the
program at $30 million for FY2004-FY2008. In 2005, the reauthorization of VAWA (P.L. 109162) authorized annual funding at $40 million for the Transitional Housing Program for FY2007FY2011. Most recently, the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2013 (P.L. 113-4)
reauthorized the Transitional Housing Program for FY2014-FY2018, decreasing the authorized
annual funding level to $35 million.
The Transitional Housing Program first received appropriations in FY2004 as a separate,
standalone program. For FY2005 through FY2011, Congress appropriated funding for the
program through a set-aside from the STOP (Services, Training, Officers, and Prosecutors)
Formula Grant Program. In FY2012 and FY2013, Congress once again funded the Transitional
Housing Program as a separate, standalone program. (For more information about the Violence
Against Women Act, see CRS Report R42499, The Violence Against Women Act: Overview,
Legislation, and Federal Funding, by Lisa N. Sacco.)
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
Homeless Assistance Grants
The Homeless Assistance Grants were established in 1987 as part of the Stewart B. McKinney
Homeless Assistance Act (P.L. 100-77). The grants, administered by HUD, fund housing and
services for homeless persons. The Homeless Assistance Grants have gone through several
permutations since their enactment, with the most recent change taking place when the grants
were reauthorized in the 111th Congress by the Homeless Emergency Assistance and Rapid
Transition to Housing (HEARTH) Act, enacted as part of the Helping Families Save Their Homes
Act (P.L. 111-22).
Until enactment of the HEARTH Act, the Homeless Assistance Grants were made up of four
programs: the Emergency Shelter Grants (ESG) program, the Supportive Housing Program
(SHP),
the Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation Assistance for Single-Room Occupancy Dwellings (SRO)
Congressional Research Service
13
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
(SRO) program, and the Shelter Plus Care (S+C) program. The HEARTH Act maintained the ESG
ESG program, but renamed it the Emergency Solutions Grants program, and consolidated the three
three remaining programs (SHP, SRO, and S+C), sometimes referred to as the “competitive
grants,”
into one program called the “Continuum of Care” program (CoC). Funds appropriated for the
ESG program will continue to be distributed via formula to states and localities while funds for
the new CoC program, like its three predecessor programs, will be distributed through a
competition.
The HEARTH Act specified that the provisions in the law would be effective on the earlier of 18
months from the law’s enactment (on or about November 20, 2010) or three months from the date
on which HUD publishes final regulations. Because HUD has not published final regulations for
the CoC program, the changes in the HEARTH Act technically took effect 18 months after
Congressional Research Service
14
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
enactment. However, HUD has stated that current regulations apply until new regulations become
effective, and FY2011 competitive funding was still distributed through the SHP, SRO, and S+C
programs. As a result, this section of the report describes the ESG, SHP, SRO, and S+C programs
because the CoC program has not yet been implemented. (To read more about changes that will
occur when provisions of the HEARTH Act are implemented, see CRS Report RL33764, The
HUD Homeless Assistance Grants: Current Operation and HEARTH Act Changes, by Libby
(CoC) program. Further, rural
communities may apply separately for funds that otherwise would have been awarded as part of
the Continuum of Care program. The HEARTH Act provides that not less than 5% of Continuum
of Care Program funds be set aside for rural communities. (For more information about the
Homeless Assistance Grants, see CRS Report RL33764, The HUD Homeless Assistance Grants:
Programs Authorized by the HEARTH Act, by Libby Perl.)
Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) Program
(42 U.S.C. §§11371-11378) The ESG program distributes formula grants to state and local
governments; recipient governments may then distribute all or a portion of the funds to private
nonprofit organizations that provide assistance to homeless individuals. ESG funds are distributed
so that state and local governments receive the same proportion of total ESG funds as they
receive of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. Factors used to determine how
CDBG funds are distributed include poverty rates, population, the number of persons in poverty,
housing overcrowding (homes in which there are more than 1.01 persons per room), the age of
housing (the number of housing structures built prior to 1940), and the extent of population
growth lag in a given community. There is a dollar-for-dollar match requirement for local
governments; there is no match requirement for the first $100,000 for states but a dollar-for-dollar
match is required for the remainder of the funds. Recipient states and local governments may use
up to 7.5% of their grants for administrative costs.
ESG funds may be used in two categories: (1) emergency shelter and related services, and (2)
homelessness prevention and rapid rehousing. The statute limits use of funds in the first category
to the greater of 60% of a state or local government’s ESG allocation or the amount the recipient
spent for these purposes in the year prior to the effective date of the HEARTH Act.
•
In the case of emergency shelter, funds may be used for the renovation, major
rehabilitation, or conversion of buildings into emergency shelters. In addition,
ESG funds may be used to provide services in conjunction with emergency
shelter, including employment, health, or education services; family support
services for homeless youth; substance abuse services; victim services; or mental
health services. Another allowable use of funds is the maintenance, operation,
insurance, utilities, and furnishing costs for these emergency shelters.
•
Funds may also be used to prevent homelessness or to quickly find housing for
those who find themselves homeless. Recipients may use funds to provide shortor medium-term rental assistance for individuals and families at risk of
homelessness. Funds may also be used to provide services for those who are
homeless or to help stabilize those at risk of homelessness. These services
include housing searches, outreach to property owners, legal services, credit
repair, payment of security or utility deposits, utility payments, a final month of
rental assistance, or moving costs.
Supportive Housing Program (SHP)
(SHP was formerly codified at 42 U.S.C. §§11381-11389) Housing funded under the SHP may be
transitional housing for individuals and families for up to 24 months, permanent housing for
individuals with disabilities, or single room occupancy dwellings. In order to receive funds,
Congressional Research Service
15
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
permanent housing must provide supportive services for its residents such as case management,
child care, employment assistance, outpatient health services, and food and cash assistance.
States, local governmental entities, private nonprofit organizations, or community mental health
associations that are public nonprofit organizations may apply for funds through their local
Continuum of Care (CoC) planning boards. SHP requires that not less than 25% of funds be used
to serve homeless families with children, not less than 25% be used to serve homeless persons
with disabilities, and not less than 10% be used for providing supportive services. There is also a
dollar-for-dollar match requirement for acquisition, rehabilitation, and construction activities, a
20% match for services, and a 25% match requirement for operational expenses. No provider may
use more than 5% of SHP funds for administrative purposes.
Shelter Plus Care Program (S+C)
(S+C was formerly codified at 42 U.S.C. §§11403-11406b) The S+C program provides tenantand project-based rental subsidies to homeless adults with disabilities. Like the Section 8
program, tenants pay 30% of their income toward housing and the administering body pays the
rest. The assistance is initially funded for five years, but can be renewed at the end of those five
years on an annual basis. S+C grants must be matched by local communities dollar for dollar.
While S+C grant dollars cannot be used to fund supportive services, grantees are expected to
partner with other agencies to provide services and the dollar for dollar match requirement can be
met through spending on services. Not less than 50% of S+C rental units must be reserved for
homeless individuals who are seriously mentally ill, have chronic substance abuse problems, or
both. A state, unit of general local government (city, county, town, township, parish, or village),
or public housing authority may apply for funds through their local CoC boards. Grantees may
provide rental assistance to private nonprofit entities (including community mental health centers
established as nonprofit organizations) that own or lease dwelling units.
Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation Assistance for Single-Room Occupancy
Dwellings (SRO)
(SRO was formerly codified at 42 U.S.C. §§11401, 11407-11407b) Under the SRO program,
HUD provides rental subsidies, through public housing authorities, to support housing units that
are similar to dormitories, having single bedrooms, community bathrooms, and kitchen facilities.
The SRO units are funded as part of HUD’s Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation program; the
program requires grant recipients to spend at least $3,000 per unit to rehabilitate property to be
used for SRO housing. Grant recipients are then reimbursed for the costs of rehabilitating the
SRO units through Section 8 rental assistance payments that they receive over a 10-year contract
period. The costs of rehabilitation are amortized and added to a base rental amountCongressional Research Service
14
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
Continuum of Care (CoC) Program
(42 U.S.C. §§11381-11389) The CoC program continues to provide the same types of assistance
that were available in its three predecessor programs (SHP, S+C, and SRO), including transitional
housing, permanent supportive housing, supportive services, and Homeless Management
Information Systems (HMIS), but without the need for grantees to select among three separate
grant programs depending on the services provided. Grantees may also use funds for rapid
rehousing, a process through which grantees help homeless individuals and families find housing,
and support them for a period of time until they are stable.
CoC funds are distributed through a community process that is also referred to as the “Continuum
of Care.” Through this process, local communities (typically cities, counties, and combinations of
both) establish CoC advisory boards made up of representatives from local government agencies,
service providers, community members, and formerly homeless individuals who meet to establish
local priorities and strategies to address homelessness in their communities. Each Continuum of
Care designates a Collaborative Applicant (either itself or another eligible applicant) to apply for
funds.
Eligible grant recipients are state governments, local governments, instrumentalities of state and
local governments, Public Housing Authorities, and private nonprofit organizations. Grantees
may provide housing and services by acquiring, rehabilitating, or constructing properties; leasing
properties; providing rental assistance, whether tenant-based, project-based, or sponsor-based;
and by paying operating costs. Both grantees and the local Continuum of Care planning entities
may use funds for administrative purposes―10% for grantees and 3% for Collaborative
Applicants (and another 3% for Collaborative Applicants that take on additional responsibility).
Each recipient community must match the total grant funds received with 25% in funds from
other sources (including other federal grants) or in-kind contributions (with an exception for
leasing).
Rural Housing Stability (RHS) Grants
(42 U.S.C. §11408) As of the date of this report, HUD had not yet distributed funds to rural
communities through the RHS program. The program reserves not less than 5% of Continuum of
Care Program funds for rural communities to apply separately for funds that would otherwise be
awarded as part of the Continuum of Care Program. A rural community is defined to include (1) a
county where no part is contained within a metropolitan statistical area, (2) a county located
within a metropolitan statistical area, but where at least 75% of the county population is in
nonurban Census blocks, or (3) a county located in a state where the population density is less
than 30 people per square mile, and at least 1.25% of the acreage in the state is under federal
jurisdiction. However, under this definition, no metropolitan city in the state (as defined by the
CDBG statute) can be the sole beneficiary of the RHS grants.
Unlike the Continuum of Care program, rural communities are able to serve persons who do not
necessarily meet HUD’s definition of “homeless individual.” P.L. 111-22 provides that HUD may
award grants to rural communities to be used for (1) re-housing or improving the housing
situation of those who are homeless or are in the worst housing situations in their geographic
area, (2) stabilizing the housing situation of those in imminent danger of losing housing, and (3)
improving the ability of the lowest-income residents in the community to afford stable housing.
Congressional Research Service
15
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
Grantees under the RHS program may use funds to assist people who are experiencing
homelessness in many of the same ways as the CoC program. These include transitional housing,
permanent housing, rapid rehousing, data collection, and a range of supportive services. Funds
may also be used for homelessness prevention activities, relocation assistance, short-term
emergency housing, and home repairs that are necessary to make housing habitable.
Department of Labor (DOL)
Homeless Veterans Reintegration Program
(38 U.S.C. §2021) The Homeless Veterans Reintegration Program (HVRP) provides grants to
states or other public entities and nonprofit organizations to operate employment programs that
reach out to homeless veterans. The main goal of the HVRP is to reintegrate homeless veterans
into the economic mainstream and labor force. HVRP grantee organizations provide services that
include outreach, assistance in drafting a resume and preparing for interviews, job search
Congressional Research Service
16
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
assistance, subsidized trial employment, job training, and follow-up assistance after placement.
Recipients of HVRP grants also provide supportive services not directly related to employment
such as transportation, provision of or assistance in finding housing, and referral for mental health
treatment or substance abuse counseling. HVRP grantees often employ formerly homeless
veterans to provide outreach to homeless veterans and to counsel them as they search for
employment and stability. In 2010, the Veterans’ Benefits Act of 2010 (P.L. 111-275) created a
separate HVRP for women veterans and veterans with children. The new program, which
includes child care among its services, is authorized from FY2011 through FY2015 at $1 million
per year. In program year 2010, DOL awarded 26 grants to assist women veterans, totaling more
than $5 million.39
HVRP, initially authorized as part of the McKinney Vento Homeless Assistance Act, was most
recently authorized at $50 million through FY2012FY2014 as part of the Veterans Health Care Facilities
Capital Improvement Act of 2011 (P.L. 112Department of Veterans Affairs
Expiring Authorities Act of 2013 (P.L. 113-37). (For more information about HVRP and other
programs for homeless veterans, see CRS Report RL34024, Veterans and Homelessness, by
Libby Perl.)
Referral and Counseling Services: Veterans at Risk of Homelessness Who Are
Transitioning from Certain Institutions
(38 U.S.C. §2023) The Homeless Veterans Comprehensive Assistance Act of 2001 (P.L. 107-95)
instituted a demonstration program to provide job training and placement services to veterans
leaving prison, long-term care, or mental institutions who are at risk of homelessness. The
enacting law gave both the VA and the Department of Labor authority over the program. By 2005,
the program awarded $1.45 million in initial grants to seven recipients. These grants were
extended through March 2006 with funding of $1.6 million and then again for an additional 15
months, through June 30, 2007, with $2 million in funding.4039 The statute enacting the program
provided that it would cease on January 24, 2006, four years after its enactment. However, on
October 10, 2008, Congress extended the program through FY2012 as part of the Veterans’
39
U.S. Department of Labor, Office of the Assistance Secretary for Veterans’ Employment and Training, FY2006 and
FY2007 Annual Report to Congress, May 21, 2008, p. 12, http://www.dol.gov/vets/media/FY20062007_Annual_Report_To_Congress.pdf.
Congressional Research Service
16
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
Mental Health and Other Care Improvements Act of 2008 (P.L. 110-387). The new law removed
the program’s demonstration status and expanded the number of sites able to provide services to
12. In FY2011, the VA extended grants to 16 recipients to assist transitioning veterans.41Most recently the program was authorized through FY2014 as part of the Department of
Veterans Affairs Expiring Authorities Act of 2013 (P.L. 113-37).
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
For more detailed information about VA programs for homeless veterans, see CRS Report
RL34024, Veterans and Homelessness, by Libby Perl.
39
U.S. Department of Labor, “US Labor Department announces more than $5 million in grants to organizations serving
homeless female veterans and veterans with families,” press release, June 20, 2010, http://www.dol.gov/opa/media/
press/vets/VETS20100917.htm.
40
U.S. Department of Labor, Office of the Assistance Secretary for Veterans’ Employment and Training, FY2006 and
FY2007 Annual Report to Congress, May 21, 2008, p. 12, http://www.dol.gov/vets/media/FY20062007_Annual_Report_To_Congress.pdf.
41
U.S. Department of Labor, FY2013 Congressional Budget Justifications, p. VETS-44, http://www.dol.gov/dol/
budget/2013/PDF/CBJ-2013-V3-05.pdf.
Congressional Research Service
17
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
Health Care for Homeless Veterans (HCHV)42Health Care for Homeless Veterans (HCHV)40
(38 U.S.C. §§2031-2034) The Health Care for Homeless Veterans program operates at VA sites
around the country where staff provide outreach services, physical and psychiatric health exams,
treatment, and referrals to homeless veterans with mental health and substance use issues. As
appropriate, the HCHV program places homeless veterans needing long-term treatment into one
of its contract community-based facilities. Housing is provided either through residential
treatment facilities that contract with the VA or through organizations that receive Grant and Per
Diem funding for transitional housing (the “Homeless Providers Grant and Per Diem Program” is
described below). In FY2009, VA’s 132 HCHV sites provided outreach, treatment, and referral
services to just over 77,696 homeless veterans.43 Of those receiving assistance, 2,472 veterans
stayed in residential treatment facilities in FY2009, with an average stay of about 68 days.44 The
The HCHV program was most recently authorized through December 31, 2012, as part of the Veterans
Health Care Facilities Capital Improvement Act of 2011 (P.L. 112-372014,
as part of the VA Expiring Authorities Extension Act of 2013 (P.L. 113-59).
Homeless Providers Grant and Per Diem Program45Program41
(38 U.S.C. §§2011-2013) The Grant and Per Diem program has two aspects: the grants portion of
the program funds capital grants that organizations may use to build or rehabilitate facilities to be
used for transitional housing and service centers for homeless veterans, while the per diem
portion funds services to homeless veterans. Specifically, capital grants may be used to purchase
buildings, to expand or remodel existing buildings, and to procure vans for use in outreach to and
transportation for, homeless veterans. Service centers for veterans must provide health care,
mental health services, hygiene facilities, benefits and employment counseling, meals,
transportation assistance, job training and placement services, and case management. The capital
grants will fund up to 65% of the costs of acquisition, expansion, or remodeling of facilities, and
grantees must provide the remaining 35%. Under the per diem portion of the program, both
capital grant recipients and those organizations that would be eligible for capital grants (but have
not applied for them) are eligible to apply for funds, although grant recipients have priority in
receiving per diem funds.
The Grant and Per Diem program was most recently authorized as part of the Veterans Health
Care Facilities Capital Improvement Act of 2011 (P.L. 112-37). The program had been
permanently authorized at $150 million, but P.L. 112-37 increased the authorized levels for
FY2010 ($175 million), FY2011 ($218 million), and FY2012 ($250 million) to comport with
estimated obligation levels in the VA budget.46 In FY2013 and thereafter, the authorized level
returns to $150 million.
42
Also known as the Homeless Chronically Mentally Ill Veterans (HCMI) program.
Wesley J. Kasprow, Timothy Cuerdon, Diane DiLello, Leslie Cavallaro, and Nicole Harelik, Healthcare for
Homeless Veterans Programs: Twenty-Third Annual Report, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Northeast Program
Evaluation Center, March 25, 2010, p. 23.
44
Ibid., pp. 121-122.
45
Formerly called the Homeless Veterans Comprehensive Services Programs.
46
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, FY2012 Budget Submission, Volume II: Medical Programs and Information
Technology, pp. 1H-12, http://www.va.gov/budget/docs/summary/Fy2012_Volume_IIMedical_Programs_Information_Technology.pdf.
43
Congressional Research Service
18
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislationis authorized at $250 million for FY2014 and $150 million for
each fiscal year thereafter (P.L. 113-37). Prior to 2011, the program had been permanently
authorized at $150 million per year (P.L. 110-387). However, Congress increased the
authorization level in FY2010 through FY2012 (P.L. 112-37), FY2013 (P.L. 112-154), and
40
41
Also known as the Homeless Chronically Mentally Ill Veterans (HCMI) program.
Formerly called the Homeless Veterans Comprehensive Services Programs.
Congressional Research Service
17
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
FY2014 (P.L. 113-37) to comport with amounts that the VA estimated were needed for the
program in each of these fiscal years.42
Homeless Veterans with Special Needs
(38 U.S.C. §2061) Within the Homeless Providers Grant and Per Diem program there is also a
special purpose program that provides grants to health care facilities and to grant and per diem
providers to encourage the development of programs for homeless veterans who are women
(including women who care for minor dependents,
veterans with children (men and women), frail elderly, terminally ill, or chronically
mentally ill.
The program was most recently authorized at $5 million per year through FY2012 as
part of the Veterans Health Care Facilities Capital Improvement Act of 2011 (P.L. 112FY2014 as part of the
Department of Veterans Affairs Expiring Authorities Act of 2013 (P.L. 113-37).
Domiciliary Care for Homeless Veterans (DCHV)
(38 U.S.C. §1710(b)) The Domiciliary Care for Homeless Veterans program is a residential
rehabilitation program specifically intended to meet the clinical needs of homeless veterans while
preventing the therapeutically inappropriate use of hospital and nursing home care services.
Veterans served through the Domiciliary Care program typically suffer from mental illness,
substance use disorders, or both.47 The VA operates the DCHV program at 42 locations with
2,146 total beds across the country.4843 A multi-dimensional, individually tailored treatment
approach approach
is used to stabilize the clinical status of veterans while the underlying causes of
homelessness are
addressed. The basic components of the DCHV program include community
outreach and
referral, admission screening and assessment, medical and psychiatric evaluation,
treatment and
rehabilitation, and post-discharge community support. DCHV staff help veterans
apply for
housing assistance, or arrangements are made for placement of homeless veterans in
long-term
care facilities such as State Soldiers Homes, group homes, adult foster care, or halfway
houses.
Homeless veterans are provided employment training through involvement in the VA’s
Incentive Incentive
Therapy Program, a medically prescribed rehabilitation program involving therapeutic
work work
assignments at VA medical centers for which veterans receive nominal payments. In
FY2009, 6,311 veterans completed treatment in DCHV programs with an average stay of 112
days at the VA facilities.49
Compensated Work Therapy Program50Program44
(38 U.S.C. §2063) The Compensated Work Therapy (CWT) program is a comprehensive
rehabilitation program that prepares veterans for competitive employment and independent living.
The program was created by the Veterans Omnibus Health Care Act of 1976 (P.L. 94-581). The
major goals of the program are (1) to use remunerative work to maximize a veteran’s level of
functioning; (2) to prepare veterans for successful re-entry into the community as productive
citizens; and (3) to provide structured daily activity to those veterans with severe and chronic
disabling physical and/or mental conditions. As part of their work therapy, veterans produce items
for sale or undertake subcontracts to provide certain products and/or services such as temporary
staffing to a company. Funds collected from the sale of these products and/or services are used to
fund the program. Funding for this program comes from the VA’s Special Therapeutic and
4742
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, FY2012 Budget Submission, Volume II: Medical Programs and Information
Technology, pp. 1H-12, http://www.va.gov/budget/docs/summary/Fy2012_Volume_IIMedical_Programs_Information_Technology.pdf.
43
Catherine Leda Seibyl, Sharon Medak, Linda Baldino, and Timothy Cuerdon, Twenty-First Progress Report on the
Domiciliary Care for Homeless Veterans Program, FY2009, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Northeast Program
Evaluation Center, March 24, 2010, p. 8.
48
Ibid., p. 2.
49
Ibid., pp. 7, 9.
5044
The CWT program was formerly called the Special Therapeutic and Rehabilitation Activities Fund.
Congressional Research Service
1918
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
fund the program. Funding for this program comes from the VA’s Special Therapeutic and
Rehabilitation Activities Fund, and the program is permanently authorized at 38 U.S.C. Section
1718(c).
HUD VA Supported Housing (HUD-VASH)
(42 U.S.C. §1437f(o)(19)) HUD-VASH is a joint HUD and VA initiative that provides specially
designated Section 8 rental assistance vouchers to homeless veterans while the VA provides
supportive services. The HUD-VASH statute requires that the program serve homeless veterans
who have chronic mental illnesses or chronic substance use disorders; however, this requirement
has been waived in recent years. Every homeless veteran who receives a housing voucher must be
assigned to a VA case manager and receive supportive services. Today’s HUD-VASH program
originally began as a Memorandum of Agreement between HUD and the VA, and through that
relationship 1,780 vouchers were allocated to homeless veterans. The Homeless Veterans
Comprehensive Assistance Act of 2001 (P.L. 107-95) codified the program and authorized the
creation of an additional 500 vouchers each year for FY2003-FY2006. In the 109th Congress, the
Veterans Benefits, Health Care, and Information Technology Act of 2006 (P.L. 109-461) similarly
authorized additional HUD-VASH vouchers for FY2007 through FY2011.
Funds were not provided for additional vouchers until the 110th Congress, when the FY2008
Consolidated Appropriations Act (P.L. 110-161) allocated $75 million for additional HUD-VASH
vouchers. This appropriation funded approximately 10,000 vouchers for one year (after the first
year, vouchers are funded through the Section 8 account). Then, in both FY2009 and FY2010,
Congress again appropriated $75 million for HUD-VASH (P.L. 111-8 and P.L. 111-117
respectively).51 The appropriation for FY2011 was $50 million and funded approximately 6,800
vouchers (P.L. 112-10). The FY2012 appropriation went back up to $75 million, bringing the total
number of vouchers available to nearly 48Since then, Congress has appropriated funding for new HUD-VASH vouchers in each
appropriations act through FY2014, for a total of about $500 million to fund HUD-VASH
vouchers for one-year terms, bringing the total number of vouchers that are expected to be funded
over the time period to approximately 68,000. Funds for supportive services are allocated
through through
the VA health appropriation—VA budget documents estimated that obligations in
FY2012 would be approximately $202 million.
Supportive Services for Veteran Families
In the 110th Congress, the Veterans’ Mental Health and Other Care Improvements Act of 2008
(P.L. 110-387) authorized a program of supportive services to assist very low-income veterans
and their families who either are making the transition from homelessness to housing or who are
moving from one location to another. The VA calls the program Supportive Services for Veteran
Families. The law specified that funds be made available for the program from the amount
appropriated for VA medical services—$15 million for FY2009, $20 million for FY2010, and $25
million for FY2011. Most recently, the program was authorized for FY2012 at $100at $300 million
for FY2014 as part of the Department of Veterans Affairs Expiring Authorities Act of 2013 (P.L.
113-37).
Organizations that assist families transitioning from homelessness to permanent housing are
given priority for funding under the law. Among the eligible services that recipient organizations
may provide are case management, health care services, daily living services, assistance with
financial planning, transportation, legal assistance, as
part of the Veterans Health Care Facilities Capital Improvement Act of 2011 (P.L. 112-37).
On July 26, 2011, the VA announced the first round of funding for the SSVF grants.52 A total of
$60 million was awarded through a competitive process to 85 private nonprofit organizations and
51
Nearly all of the HUD-VASH vouchers are made available to individual veterans to find housing in the private
market. However, nearly 700 of the FY2010-funded vouchers and 100 of the FY2011-funded vouchers were distributed
competitively to public housing authorities (PHAs) to be “project based.” Project-basing of Section 8 vouchers occurs
when a PHA decides to use the vouchers for particular units of housing rather than to maintain their portability.
52
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, “VA Launches New Prevention Initiative to Serve 22,000 Veteran Families at
Risk of Homelessness,” press release, July 26, 2011, http://www.va.gov/opa/pressrel/pressrelease.cfm?id=2139.
Congressional Research Service
20
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
consumer cooperatives, the entities that are to provide supportive services. Organizations that
assist families transitioning from homelessness were given priority for funding. Among the
eligible services that recipient organizations may provide are case management, health care
services, daily living services, assistance with financial planning, transportation, legal assistance,
child care, and housing counseling.
HUD and VA Homelessness Prevention Demonstration Program
As part of the FY2009 Omnibus Appropriations Act (P.L. 111-8), Congress appropriated $10
million through the HUD Homeless Assistance Grants Accountaccount to be used for a pilot program to
prevent homelessness among veterans. The appropriation law required that the program be
operated in a limited number of sites, at least three of which were to have a large number of
Congressional Research Service
19
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
individuals transitioning from military to civilian life, and up to four of which were to be in rural
areas.
In July 2010, HUD issued a notice of implementation of the new demonstration program.53 HUD,
HUD, in consultation with the VA and DOL, selected five geographic areas in which local Continuums
Continuums of Care (CoCs) are to assign a grantee to carry out the prevention program. The areas were
were chosen based on the number of homeless veterans reported by the local CoC and VA Medical
Medical Center, the number of Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom veterans
veterans accessing VA health care, the presence and diversity of military sites in the area (e.g.,
representation of different branches of the military, National Guard, and Reserves), availability of
VA health care, type of geographic area (urban versus rural), and the community’s capacity to
administer the prevention program. The five areas and corresponding military bases selected were
(1) San Diego, CA (Camp Pendleton); (2) Killeen, TX (Fort Hood); (3) Watertown, NY (Fort
Drum); (4) Tacoma, WA (Joint Base Lewis-McChord); and (5) Tampa, FL (MacDill Air Force
Base).
The prevention program is to operateoperates much like the Homelessness Prevention and Rapid ReHousing Re-Housing
Program created as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Funds may be
used for
short-term rental assistance (up to three months) or medium-term rental assistance (4-18
months),
for up to six months of rental arrears, for security or utility deposits, for utility
payments, and for
help with moving expenses.5445 Recipients may also use funds for supportive
services that help
veterans and their families find and maintain housing such as case management,
housing search
and placement, credit repair, child care, and transportation.5546
Other Activities for Homeless Veterans
In addition to the targeted programs for which specific funding is available (see Table 2 at the
end of this report), the VA engages in several activities to assist homeless veterans that are not
reflected in this report as separate programs. An Advisory Committee on Homeless Veterans was
established within VA to consult with and seek advice concerning VA benefits and services to
53
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Notice of FY2009 Implementation of the Veterans
Homelessness Prevention Demonstration Program, July 14, 2010, http://www.hudhre.info/documents/
VetsHomelessPreventionDemo.pdf.
54
Ibid., pp. 9-11.
55
Ibid., p. 11.
Congressional Research Service
21
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
homeless veterans (38 U.S.C. §2066). The Advisory Committee consists of 15 members
appointed from Veterans Service Organizations, community-based homeless service providers,
previously homeless veterans, experts in mental illness, substance use disorders, and others. The
Advisory Committee was most recently authorized through December 30, 2012, as part of the
Veterans Health Care Facilities Capital Improvement Act of 2011 (P.L. 112-3731, 2014, as part of the VA
Expiring Authorities Extension Act of 2013 (P.L. 113-59).
Another VA initiative is Comprehensive Homeless Centers (CHCs). These CHCs are located in
eight cities, and consolidate all of the VA’s homeless programs in that area into a single
organizational framework to promote integration within the VA and coordination with non-VA
homeless programs.5647 CHCs offer a comprehensive continuum of care to help homeless veterans
escape from homelessness. The VA also sponsors Drop-in Centers, which provide a daytime
sanctuary where homeless veterans can clean up, wash their clothes, get a daytime meal, and
participate in a variety of low intensity therapeutic and rehabilitative activities. Linkages with
45
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Notice of FY2009 Implementation of the Veterans
Homelessness Prevention Demonstration Program, July 14, 2010, pp. 9-11, http://www.hudhre.info/documents/
VetsHomelessPreventionDemo.pdf.
46
Ibid., p. 11.
47
Comprehensive Homeless Centers are located in Anchorage, Brooklyn, Cleveland, Dallas, Little Rock, Pittsburgh,
San Francisco, and Los Angeles.
Congressional Research Service
20
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
longer-term assistance are also available. The VA Excess Property for Homeless Veterans
Initiative provides for the distribution of federal excess personal property (hats, parkas, footwear,
sleeping bags) to homeless veterans and homeless veterans programs.
The Department of Labor makes funds available through its Homeless Veterans Reintegration
Program for local communities that organize Stand Downs for Homeless Veterans. Stand Downs
are local events, staged annually in many cities across the country, in which local Veterans
Service Organizations, businesses, government entities, and other social service organizations
come together for up to three days to provide services for homeless veterans. Some of these
services include food, shelter, clothing, and a range of other types of assistance, including VA
provided health care, benefits certification, and linkages with other programs. Another program,
called Veterans Benefits Administration’s (VBA’s) Acquired Property Sales for Homeless
Providers, allows the VA to sell, at a discount, foreclosed properties to nonprofit organizations
and government agencies that will use them to shelter or house homeless veterans. Finally,
Project CHALENG for Veterans is a nationwide VA initiative to work with other agencies and
better coordinate the response to the needs of homeless veterans. VA regional offices designate
“points of contact” from among local service providers, and they in turn work with other federal
agencies, state and local governments, and nonprofit organizations to assess the needs of
homeless veterans and develop action plans to meet identified needs.
Social Security Administration (SSA)
The SOAR Initiative (SSI/SSDI Outreach, Access and Recovery), while not a Social Security
Administration (SSA) program, assists homeless individuals in obtaining Social Security
Disability Insurance (SSDI) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits. SOAR was
created through a collaborative effort among HHS, HUD, and SSA. SOAR makes technical
assistance available to train state and local human services workers to better serve homeless
individuals with mental illnesses or substance use disorders who may qualify for Social Security
benefits. The program came about through the Homeless Policy Academy Initiative, a series of
collaborations among HUD, HHS, VA, DOL, ED, the Interagency Council on Homelessness, and
the states that took place from 2001 through 2007. SOAR was undertaken after multiple states
requested training regarding the SSDI and SSI application processes.57 As part of the initiative,
56
Comprehensive Homeless Centers are located in Anchorage, Brooklyn, Cleveland, Dallas, Little Rock, Pittsburgh,
San Francisco, and Los Angeles.
57
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Homeless Policy Academy Initiative: Final Contractors Report,
(continued...)
Congressional Research Service
22
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
48 As part of the initiative,
representatives from 34 states received SOAR training between 2005 and 2007.5849 Funds through
the PATH program (described earlier in this report) have been used to train providers in SOAR,5950
and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Service Administration (SAMHSA) continues to
fund technical assistance to SOAR programs.60 Currently all states participate in SOAR.61
In 2011, 71% of SOAR-assisted SSI or SSDI applicants were approved for benefits.62 Although
data are limited on how homeless applicants for benefits otherwise fare on initial application,
among those localities that collect data, approval rates range between 10% and 15%.63 Of all
disability applicants in 2009 (the most recent year SSA data are available), 30% were awarded
benefits.64 An earlier evaluation of SOAR programs in 19 states also found improved access to
housing for some individuals who gained benefits, and cost savings for state public benefits
programs.65
In addition to SOAR, the Social Security Administration funded an initiative to increase the
access of homeless individuals to federal benefits through employee training, outreach to
homeless persons, and assistance with applications—the Homeless Outreach Projects and
Evaluation (HOPE) initiative. Congress provided $8 million per year for the HOPE initiative
from FY2003 through FY2005, and SSA funded 41 HOPE projects throughout the country over
three years, with awardees expected to gradually reduce their dependence on HOPE funding.66
Through the HOPE initiative, recipient organizations conducted outreach to homeless individuals
with disabling conditions and assisted them with filling out applications for benefits such as SSI
and SSDI. The program also helped individuals find assistance for their other needs, such as
health care, counseling, and housing. An evaluation of the program found that, despite the fact
that SSI and SSDI applications from HOPE program participants were processed more quickly
than comparison groups, there was no significant difference in allowance rates between
applications from HOPE programs and the comparison groups.67 However, the evaluation found
(...continued)51 Currently all states participate in SOAR.52
48
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Homeless Policy Academy Initiative: Final Contractors Report,
April 2007, p. vi, http://www.hrsa.gov/homeless/pdf/finalreport.pdf.
5849
Initially, 24 states participated in SOAR training. In August 2007, an additional 10 states were selected to participate.
See USICH Newsletter, August 9, 2007, http://www.ich.gov/newsletter/archive/08-09-07_e-newsletter.htm.
5950
See U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, FY2011 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration Congressional Budget Justification, p. SAMHSA/CMHS-57, http://www.samhsa.gov/Budget/FY2011/
SAMHSA_FY11CJ.pdf.
6051
Deborah Dennis, Margaret Lassiter, and William H. Connelly, et al., “Helping Adults Who Are Homeless Gain
Disability Benefits: the SSI/SSDI Outreach, Access, and Recovery (SOAR) Program,” Psychiatric Services, vol. 62,
no. 11 (November 2011), pp. 1373-1374.
61
Ibid.
62
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2011
SOAR Outcomes, February 2012, http://www.prainc.com/cms-assets/documents/52889-944292.2011-outcomessummary-031212.pdf.
63
Yvonne M. Perret, Deborah Dennis, and Margaret Lassiter, Improving Social Security Disability Programs for
Adults Experiencing Long-Term Homelessness, National Academy of Social Insurance, November 14, 2008, p. 3,
http://www.nasi.org/usr_doc/Perret_and_Dennis_January_2009_Rockefeller.pdf.
64
Social Security Administration, SSI Annual Statistical Report, 2010, August 2011, Table 69, http://www.ssa.gov/
policy/docs/statcomps/ssi_asr/2010/ssi_asr10.pdf.
65
Preliminary Outcomes from the SOAR Technical Assistance Initiative, Policy Research Associates, May 2008,
http://www.prainc.com/SOAR/soar101/SOAROutcomes.pdf.
66
For the funding announcement, see Social Security Administration, “Cooperative Agreements for Homeless
Outreach Projects and Evaluation (HOPE),” 68 Federal Register 55698-55709, September 26, 2003.
67
Marion L. McCoy, Cynthia S. Robins, James Bethel, Carina Tornow, and William D. Frey, Evaluation of Homeless
(continued...)52
Ibid.
Congressional Research Service
23
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
improved housing conditions for HOPE program participants,68 and that smaller percentages of
participants were living on the streets, in shelters, or in places not meant for human habitation 12
months after participating in HOPE.
Current Issues
The Economic Downturn and Family Homelessness
In December 2008, the National Bureau of Economic Research declared that the economy had
been in a recession since December 2007.69 Although the end of the recession was determined to
be June 2009,70 the effects of an economic downturn continue to be seen in the employment
sector, where the unemployment rate has remained above 8% since February of 2009, compared
to 4.9% in December 2007.71 The housing sector has also faced difficulty, with the foreclosure
rate for all loans rising from 1.28% in the first quarter of 2007 to 4.39% in the first quarter of
2012.72
Increased foreclosures and rising unemployment may result in higher rates of homelessness
among all groups, but particularly among families facing increased financial strain. For example,
school districts reported an increase in the number of students who qualify for services under the
Department of Education’s definition of homelessness from nearly 679,724 during the 2006-2007
school year to 939,903 during the 2009-2010 school year.73 The number of homeless students had
increased for three years, through the 2008-2009 school year, when it reached 956,914 students.
In June 2011, HUD released the 2010 Annual Homeless Assessment Report to Congress
(AHAR).74 The report estimated the number of sheltered homeless people (those living in
emergency or transitional housing) from October 2009 through September 2010. In 2010, an
estimated 567,334 people in families (versus unaccompanied individuals75) experienced
homelessness, an increase of 19.8% over the number in 2007.76 The number of homeless
(...continued)
Outreach Projects and Evaluation (HOPE), Social Security Administration, October 2007, pp. 3-11 and 3-13,
http://www.socialsecurity.gov/homelessness/docs/hopefinalreport.doc.
68
Ibid., p. 3-15.
69
National Bureau of Economic Research, Determination of the December 2007 Peak in Economic Activity, December
11, 2008, http://www.nber.org/cycles/dec2008.pdf.
70
National Bureau of Economic Research, Announcement of June 2009 Business Cycle Trough/End of Last Recession,
September 20, 2010, http://www.nber.org/cycles/sept2010.pdf.
71
Unemployment rates taken from versions of the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, The
Employment Situation. The most recent version is available at http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf.
72
Mortgage Bankers Association, National Delinquency Survey, First Quarter 2007, data as of March 31, 2007, p. 3,
and National Delinquency Survey, First Quarter 2012, data as of March 31, 2012, p. 3.
73
National Center for Homeless Education, Education for Homeless Children and Youths Program: Data Collection
Summary, June 2010, p. 8, http://center.serve.org/nche/downloads/data_comp_06-08.doc; and June 2011, p. 11,
http://www2.ed.gov/programs/homeless/sy2009ehcy.doc.
74
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, 2010 Annual Homeless Assessment Report to Congress, June
2011, http://www.hudhre.info/documents/2010HomelessAssessmentReport.pdf (hereinafter, 2010 AHAR).
75
HUD includes unaccompanied adults, unaccompanied youth, and multi-adult households without children in its
estimate of unaccompanied individuals.
76
2010 AHAR, pp. 11-12.
Congressional Research Service
24
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
households with children in 2010 was estimated to be 168,227, an increase of 28.4% over the
number of households with children estimated to be homeless in 2007 (130,968).77
Unaccompanied individuals still continue to make up the largest percentage of people
experiencing homelessness, representing 65.5% of those who were estimated to be homeless in
the 2010 AHAR.78 However, homelessness among sheltered single individuals was estimated to
have fallen by 6.4% from 2007 to 2010.7921
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
In 2011, 71% of SOAR-assisted SSI or SSDI applicants were approved for benefits.53 Although
data are limited on how homeless applicants for benefits otherwise fare on initial application,
among those localities that collect data, approval rates range between 10% and 15%.54 Of all adult
SSI applicants in 2011, 27% were awarded benefits.55 An earlier evaluation of SOAR programs in
19 states also found improved access to housing for some individuals who gained benefits, and
cost savings for state public benefits programs.56
Efforts to End Homelessness
More than a decade ago, the concept of ending homelessness was introduced in a report from the
National Alliance to End Homelessness (NAEH), which outlined a strategy to end homelessness
in 10 years.8057 The plan included four recommendations: developing local, data-driven plans to
address homelessness; using mainstream programs (such as TANF, Section 8, and SSI) to prevent
homelessness; employing a housing first strategy to assist most people who find themselves
homeless; and developing a national infrastructure of housing, income, and service supports for
low-income families and individuals. While the idea of ending homelessness for all people was
embraced by many groups, the Bush Administration and federal government focused on ending
homelessness among chronically homeless individuals specifically. For most of the decade, the
term chronically homeless was defined as “an unaccompanied homeless individual with a
disabling condition who has been continually homeless for a year or more, or has had at least four
episodes of homelessness in the past three years.”8158 The HEARTH Act updated the definition to
include families with a head of household who has a disability.8259
In the year following the release of the NAEH report, then-HUD Secretary Martinez announced
HUD’s commitment to ending chronic homelessness at the NAEH annual conference. In 2002, as
a part of his FY2003 budget, President Bush made “ending chronic homelessness in the next
decade a top objective.” The bipartisan, congressionally mandated Millennial Housing
Commission, in its Report to Congress in 2002, included ending chronic homelessness in 10
years among its principal recommendations.8360 And by 2003, the United States Interagency
Council on Homelessness (USICH) had been re-engaged after six years of inactivity and was
charged with pursuing the President’s 10-year plan.84 For the balance of the decade, multiple
federal initiatives focused funding and efforts on this goal.
However, the initiative to end chronic homelessness has raised some concerns among advocates
for homeless people that allocating resources largely to chronically homeless individuals is done
77
Ibid. p. 11.
Ibid.
79
Ibid., pp. 11-12.
80
53
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2011
SOAR Outcomes, February 2012, http://www.prainc.com/cms-assets/documents/52889-944292.2011-outcomessummary-031212.pdf.
54
Yvonne M. Perret, Deborah Dennis, and Margaret Lassiter, Improving Social Security Disability Programs for
Adults Experiencing Long-Term Homelessness, National Academy of Social Insurance, November 14, 2008, p. 3,
http://www.nasi.org/usr_doc/Perret_and_Dennis_January_2009_Rockefeller.pdf.
55
Social Security Administration, SSI Annual Statistical Report, 2012, July 2013, Table 69, http://www.ssa.gov/policy/
docs/statcomps/ssi_asr/2012/sect10.pdf.
56
Preliminary Outcomes from the SOAR Technical Assistance Initiative, Policy Research Associates, May 2008,
http://www.prainc.com/SOAR/soar101/SOAROutcomes.pdf.
57
National Alliance to End Homelessness, A Plan: Not a Dream. How to End Homelessness in Ten Years, June 1,
2000, http://www.endhomelessness.org/files/585_file_TYP_pdf.pdf.
8158
24 C.F.R. §91.5. The Homeless Emergency Assistance and Rapid Transition to Housing (HEARTH) Act (P.L. 11122) changed the definition to include families with an adult member who has a disabling condition.
8259
42 U.S.C. §11360(2).
8360
The report is available at http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/mhc/MHCReport.pdf. See pp. 54-56.
84
The Interagency Council on Homelessness (ICH) was created in 1987 in the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless
Assistance Act, P.L. 100-77. Its mission is to coordinate the national response to homelessness. The ICH is composed
of the directors of 19 federal departments and agencies whose policies and programs have some responsibility for
homeless services, including HUD, HHS, DOL, and the VA.
78
Congressional Research Service
25
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
Congressional Research Service
22
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
charged with pursuing the President’s 10-year plan.61 For the balance of the decade, multiple
federal initiatives focused funding and efforts on this goal.
However, the initiative to end chronic homelessness has raised some concerns among advocates
for homeless people that allocating resources largely to chronically homeless individuals is done
at the expense of families with children who are homeless, homeless youth, and other vulnerable
populations.8562 The HEARTH Act mandated that the USICH draft a Federal Strategic Plan to End
Homelessness among all groups (families with children, unaccompanied youth, veterans, and
chronically homeless individuals) within a year of the law’s enactment, and to update the plan
annually. In addition to the USICH plan, in November 2010 the VA announced a plan to end
homelessness among veterans within five years. These plans—to end chronic homelessness, to
end homelessness generally, and to end veterans’ homelessness—are described below.
The Chronic Homelessness Initiative
In 2002, the Bush Administration established a national goal of ending chronic homelessness
within 10 years, by 2012. An impetus behind the initiative to end chronic homelessness is that
chronically homeless individuals are estimated to account for about 10% of all users of the
homeless shelter system, but are estimated to use nearly 50% of the total days of shelter
provided.8663
Permanent supportive housing is generally seen as a solution to ending chronic homelessness.8764
Permanent supportive housing consists of low-cost housing, paired with social services, available
to low-income and/or homeless households. Services can include case management, substance
abuse counseling, mental health services, income management and support, and life skills
services. Providing permanent supportive housing to homeless adults with mental illnesses or
substance abuse disorders is sometimes referred to as the “housing first” approach—housing is
found for homeless individuals prior to treatment of their illnesses and addictions. In the late
1990s, research began to show that finding housing for homeless individuals with severe mental
illnesses meant that they were less likely to be housed temporarily by more expensive public
services, such as hospitals, jails, or prisons.88
More recently, two studies have examined outcomes of housing first initiatives. A study published
in the Journal of the American Medical Association in 2009 examined outcomes among residents
in a development for chronically homeless individuals with severe alcohol problems living in
Seattle.89 Many residents had been high-cost users of emergency room services, sobriety centers,
and jails. Researchers found that the total costs of serving residents in the 12 months prior to their
moving into the housing development (including shelter nights, time in jail, emergency medical
85in public accommodations,
such as hospitals, jails, or prisons.65 Based on the research, service providers and HUD began to
devote resources to housing first initiatives.
61
The Interagency Council on Homelessness (ICH) was created in 1987 in the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless
Assistance Act, P.L. 100-77. Its mission is to coordinate the national response to homelessness. The ICH is composed
of the directors of 19 federal departments and agencies whose policies and programs have some responsibility for
homeless services, including HUD, HHS, DOL, and the VA.
62
See, for example, the House Financial Services Committee, Subcommittee on Housing and Community Opportunity,
Hearing on Reauthorization of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act, Part II, 110th Cong., 2nd sess., October
16, 2007, http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=110_house_hearings&docid=f:39908.pdf.
8663
Randall Kuhn and Dennis Culhane, “Applying Cluster Analysis to Test a Typology of Homelessness by Pattern of
Shelter Utilization: Results from the Analysis of Administrative Data,” American Journal of Community Psychology,
vol. 26, no. 2 (April 1998), p. 219.
8764
Report from the Secretary’s Work Group on Ending Chronic Homelessness, Ending Chronic Homelessness:
Strategies for Action, Department of Health and Human Services, March 2003, pp. 12-13, http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/
homelessness/strategies03/.
8865
See Dennis Culhane, Stephen Metraux, and Trevor Hadley, “Public Service Reductions Associated with Placement
of Homeless Persons with Severe Mental Illness in Supportive Housing,” Housing Policy Debate, vol. 13, no. 1 (2002):
107-163.
89
Mary E. Larimer, Daniel K. Malone, and Michelle D. Garner, et al., “Health Care and Public Service Use and Costs
Before and After Provision of Housing for Chronically Homeless Persons with Severe Alcohol Problems,” Journal of
the American Medical Association, vol. 301, no. 13 (April 1, 2009), pp. 1349-1357.
Congressional Research Service
26
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
services, and Medicaid and other healthcare costs) were $42,964 per person per year.90 Twelve
months after moving into the development, the cost had been reduced to $13,440 per resident per
year. Cost reductions grew over time, indicating that length of time housed could contribute to
savings.91 In addition, the median number of drinks consumed by residents per day and days
drinking to intoxication also declined.92 A HUD study published in 2007 looked at housing
stability and health outcomes of residents in three housing first programs. During a one-year
period, 43% of clients in the three programs remained in housing during the entire 12-month
period while another 41% stayed intermittently, ultimately returning to the housing first programs
before the end of the year.93 Regarding health outcomes, the study found little change in
psychiatric impairment among those who stayed in housing permanently or intermittently and
some decrease in participants’ levels of impairment related to substance use.94
.
Congressional Research Service
23
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
The Administration undertook several projects to reach its goal of ending chronic homelessness
within 10 years, each of which took place during the mid-2000s. These included (1) a
collaboration among HUD, HHS, and VA (the Collaborative Initiative to Help End Chronic
Homelessness) that funded housing and treatment for chronically homeless individuals; (2) a
HUD and DOL project called Ending Chronic Homelessness through Employment and Housing,
through which HUD funded permanent supportive housing and DOL offered employment
assistance; and (3) a HUD pilot program called Housing for People Who Are Homeless and
Addicted to Alcohol that provided supportive housing for chronically homeless persons.
In addition, since FY2005 HUD has encouraged the development of housing for chronically
homeless individuals in the way that it distributes the Homeless Assistance Grants to applicants
through its annual grant competition. HUD awards points to applicants if their Continuums of
Care (the geographic entities that collectively apply to HUD for funds) have developed 10-year
plans to end chronic homelessness. In addition, through the competition grantees can receive
additional funding—a “permanent housing bonus”—if they create permanent supportive housing
for individuals with disabilities or families with an adult member who has a disability. While the
permanent housing bonus does not technically require that housing be created for those who are
chronically homeless, often those homeless individuals who have disabilities are chronically
homeless. Prior to 2009, the permanent housing bonus was available only to develop housing for
chronically homeless individuals.
When the Continuum of Care program authorized by the HEARTH Act is implemented, at least
HUD’s Continuum of Care program requires that at least 30% of funds (not including those for
permanent housing renewal contracts) are to be used to
provide permanent supportive housing to
individuals with disabilities or families with an adult
head of household (or youth in the absence
of an adult) who has a disability. This requirement
will be reduced proportionately as
communities increase permanent housing units for those
individuals and families, and it will end
when HUD determines that a total of 150,000 permanent
housing units have been provided for homeless persons with disabilities since 2001.
90
Ibid., p. 1355.
Ibid., p. 1356.
92
Ibid., pp. 1354-1355.
93
Carol L. Pearson, Gretchen Locke, Ann Elizabeth Montgomery, and Larry Buron, The Applicability of Housing First
Models to Homeless Persons with Serious Mental Illness, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, July
2007, p. 62, http://www.huduser.org/Publications/pdf/hsgfirst.pdf. The sample size in the study was 80 individuals.
94
Ibid., pp. 83-84 and 88-89.
91
Congressional Research Service
27
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
homeless persons with disabilities since 2001.
The U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness Federal Strategic Plan to
Prevent and End Homelessness
The HEARTH Act, enacted on May 20, 2009, as part of the Helping Families Save Their Homes
Act (P.L. 111-22), charged the U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness (USICH) with
developing a National Strategic Plan to End Homelessness. The HEARTH Act specified that the
plan should be made available for public comment and submitted to Congress and the President
within one year of the law’s enactment. The USICH convened working groups made up of
members of federal agencies to discuss ending homelessness among specific populations:
families, youth, chronically homeless individuals, and veterans.9566 The council then held regional
meetings to get feedback from various stakeholders, and it accepted public comments on its
website during March 2010.9667
On June 22, 2010, the USICH released their report entitled Opening Doors.9768 The plan sets out
goals of ending chronic homelessness as well as homelessness among veterans within the next
66
U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness, Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness Overview,
http://www.usich.gov/PDF/FSPOverviewSummary.pdf.
67
For public comments, see http://fsp.uservoice.com/forums/41991-how-can-the-local-community-contribute-to-thevisi.
68
U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness, Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End
(continued...)
Congressional Research Service
24
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
five years and ending homelessness for families, youth, and children within the next 10 years.
The report lays out five overarching strategies to assist in accomplishing these goals; each
category has between one and three specific objectives to pursue in furtherance of the goals. The
five categories are (1) increasing leadership, collaboration, and civic engagement; (2) increasing
access to stable and affordable housing; (3) increasing economic security; (4) improving health
and stability; and (5) retooling the homeless crisis response.9869
The 20112012 update to Opening Doors reported on progress toward its goals by looking at the
numbers of people experiencing homelessness, including subgroups (families with children,
chronically homeless individuals, and veterans), the number of permanent supportive housing
units available for homeless individuals, and the number of people experiencing homelessness
who leave homeless assistance programs with either earned income or access to mainstream
benefits.99 The report presented data from HUD’s point-in-time estimates of homelessness in
2010, which found increases in homelessness for families with children (1.5%) and veterans
(1.0%), but a decrease among chronically homeless individuals (1.0%).100 The permanent
supportive housing inventory grew by more than 17,000 units from 2009 to 2010, from 219,381
to 236,798.101 The USICH did not yet have 2010 data on earned income or mainstream benefits to
compare to 2009 levels.
95
U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness, Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness Overview,
http://www.usich.gov/PDF/FSPOverviewSummary.pdf.
96
For public comments, see http://fsp.uservoice.com/forums/41991-how-can-the-local-community-contribute-to-thevisi.
97
U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness, Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End
Homelessness, June 2010, http://www.ich.gov/PDF/OpeningDoors_2010_FSPPreventEndHomeless.pdf.
98
Ibid., p 26.
99
U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness, Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End
Homelessness, Update 2011, 2012, http://www.usich.gov/resources/uploads/asset_library/
USICH_FSPUpdate_2012_12312.pdf.
100
Ibid., p. 20.
101
Ibid., p. 21.
Congressional Research Service
28
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation70 The report presented data from HUD’s point-in-time estimates of homelessness in
2012. In the five years since the recession began in 2007, homelessness decreased for people in
families (by 3.7%) and for chronically homeless individuals (by 19.3%).71 While comparison data
do not exist for homeless veterans in 2007, since 2009, homelessness among veterans has
declined by 17.2%. Available permanent supportive housing units across the country reached
205,000 by 2012, increasing each year from 141,000 available in 2007.72 The USICH did not yet
have data on earned income or mainstream benefits to compare to 2009 levels.
The Department of Veterans Affairs Plan to End Homelessness
On November 3, 2009, the VA announced a plan to end homelessness among veterans within five
years.10273 However, the VA has not released a formal written plan, and instead, VA budget
documents outline areas of focus for the new plan. At least two bills introduced in the 112th
Congress call on the VA to submit plans to Congress: the Helping Homeless Heroes Act (H.R.
2559) and the Veterans Programs Improvement Act (S. 1148).
Beginning with the FY2011 budget, VA budget documents have outlined six areas of focus for
ending homelessness. These are (1) outreach and education, (2) treatment, (3) prevention, (4)
housing and supportive services, (5) employment and benefits, and (6) community
partnerships.103 74
In its FY2013FY2014 budget, the VA noted that it expected to continue expanding the
number of veterans
served through HUD-VASH, Healthcare for Homeless Veterans, the Grant
and Per Diem
Program, Supportive Services for Veteran Families, and other programs and
initiatives.
Legislation in the 112th Congresses
Enacted Legislation
The Veterans Health Care Facilities Capital Improvement Act of 2011 (P.L. 112-37), approved by
the House on September 20, 2011, and the Senate three days later, extended the expiring
authorizations for a number of programs that assist homeless veterans, including the following:
•
Homeless Veterans Reintegration Program: The authorization was extended
from the end of FY2011 through the end of FY2012 at the previous authorization
level ($50 million).
•
Health Care for Homeless Veterans Program: The authorization was extended
from December 31, 2011, through December 31, 2012.
•
Grant and Per Diem Program: The program had been permanently authorized
at $150 million. P.L. 112-37 increased the authorization for each year from
FY2010 through FY2012. Levels were increased to $175 million, $218 million,
and $250 million for each year, respectively. The higher authorization levels
comport with amounts that the VA estimates are needed for the program in each
of the three fiscal years.104 Beginning in FY2013 and thereafter, the authorization
level returns to $150 million.
•
Supportive Services for Veteran Families: The authorization was extended
through FY2012 at $100 million. The program had previously been authorized
102 initiatives.
(...continued)
Homelessness, June 2010, http://www.ich.gov/PDF/OpeningDoors_2010_FSPPreventEndHomeless.pdf.
69
Ibid., p 26.
70
U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness, Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End
Homelessness, Update 2012, http://www.usich.gov/resources/uploads/asset_library/Update2012_FINALweb.pdf.
71
Ibid., pp. 9-10.
72
Ibid., p. 18.
73
See U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, “Secretary Shinseki Details Plan to End Homelessness for Veterans,”
press press
release, November 3, 2009, http://www1.va.gov/OPA/pressrel/pressrelease.cfm?id=1807.
10374
See, for example, FY2013 VA Budget Justifications, Volume 2 Medical Programs and Information Technology, p.
1I-15, http://www.va.gov/budget/docs/summary/Fy2013_Volume_II-Medical_Programs_Information_Technology.pdf.
104
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, FY2012 Budget Submission, Volume II: Medical Programs and Information
Technology, pp. 1H-12, http://www.va.gov/budget/docs/summary/Fy2012_Volume_IIMedical_Programs_Information_Technology.pdf.
Congressional Research Service
29
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
for three years: FY2009 at $15 million, FY2010 at $20 million, and FY2011 at
$25 million.
•
Grant and Per Diem Program for Homeless Veterans with Special Needs:
The authorization was extended through FY2012 and remained at the previous
level ($5 million).
Active Legislation
Two bills that would reauthorize the Violence Against Women Act, both called the Violence
Against Women Reauthorization Act, S. 1925 and H.R. 4970, have been passed by the Senate
and House respectively. Both bills would reauthorize the program to provide transitional housing
to those who are homeless as a result of domestic violence, and would rename it “Transitional
Housing Assistance for Victims of Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, and
Stalking.”105 The authorization level for the program would be $35 million per year from FY2012
through FY2016 (down from its previously authorized level of $40 million from FY2007 through
FY2011). In addition, both S. 1925 and H.R. 4970 would define “qualified application” for grant
funding in such a way to ensure that service providers do not conduct background checks or
clinical evaluations of victims; have an understanding of domestic and dating violence, sexual
assault, and stalking; and do not make services for victims mandatory. In addition, S. 1925
contains a provision not included in H.R. 4970 that would add to the eligible supportive services
that grantees may provide to include those related to securing and retaining employment.
Also in the 112th Congress, legislation to reauthorize the Education for Homeless Children and
Youth program as part of the reauthorization of Elementary and Secondary Education Act
(ESEA) has been reported by both House and Senate committees. On October 20, 2011, the
Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions ordered reported a bill to
reauthorize the ESEA, titled the Elementary and Secondary Education Reauthorization Act of
2011 (no bill number yet). Reauthorization of EHCY is included as part of this legislation. On
February 28, 2012, the House Committee on Education and the Workforce ordered reported two
bills to reauthorize portions of the ESEA. One of these bills is H.R. 3990, the Encouraging
Innovation and Effective Teachers Act. Title VI of this bill would reauthorize EHCY. The
other bill is H.R. 3989, the Student Success Act. It includes amendments to ESEA Title I-A that
impact EHCY. For more information about reauthorization, see CRS Report R42494, Education
for Homeless Children and Youth: Background and Legislation in the 112th Congress, by Gail
McCallion.
The Homeless Children and Youth Act of 2011 (H.R. 32) was approved by the House Financial
Services Committee, Subcommittee on Insurance, Housing, and Community Opportunity on
February 7, 2012. The bill would broaden the McKinney-Vento Act definition of “homeless
individual” by including children and their families and youth who have been verified as
homeless under four other federal programs: Runaway and Homeless Youth, Education for
Homeless Children and Youths, Head Start, and programs through the Individuals with
Disabilities Education Act. H.R. 32 is also discussed in the section of this report entitled
“Defining Homelessness: Who Is Served.”
105
The new definition would remove the word “child” from the title and add the term “dating violence.”
Congressional Research Service
30
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
The Homes for Heroes Act of 2011 (H.R. 3298) was passed by the House on March 27, 2012.
The bill would create a position within HUD, the Special Assistant for Veterans Affairs, to act as a
liaison to the VA and the Interagency Council on Homelessness, to coordinate all HUD programs
and activities relating to veterans, and to ensure that veterans receive fair access to HUD housing
and homeless assistance, among other activities. The bill would also require HUD and the VA to
continue to coordinate in releasing the Veterans Supplement to the Annual Homeless Assessment
Report to Congress, and to report information about veterans served through HUD-VASH, a
description of whether and how veterans may be given special consideration in Public Housing
Authority plans, HUD’s cost of administering programs for veterans, and on the activities of the
Special Assistant for Veterans Affairs.
Funding
Table 1 shows final appropriation levels for FY2005-FY2012 for the targeted homelessness
programs included in this report with the exception of programs administered by the VA. The
table also contains a column showing appropriations that were made as part of the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act (P.L. 111-5). The appropriations figures come from the budget
justifications submitted by the various agencies or from congressional appropriations documents.
Table 2 shows actual obligations for the Department of Veterans Affairs targeted homeless
programs for FY2004-FY2011 and estimated obligations for FY2012. The figures in Table 2
were obtained from VA budget documents and conversations with VA employees.
Congressional Research Service
31
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
Table 1. Homelessness: Appropriations for Targeted Federal Programs, FY2005-FY2012
(dollars in thousands)
Agency
FY2005
FY2006
FY2007
FY2008
FY2009
Stimulus
Act,
P.L. 111-5
ED
62,496
61,871b
61,871
64,067c
70,000
65,427
65,427
65,296
65,173
Emergency Food & Shelter
DHS/
FEMA
153,000
151,470
151,470
153,000
100,000
200,000d
200,000e
119,760
120,000
Health Care for the Homelessf
HHS
149,000
151,400
167,900
174,700c
160,000g
171,700
171,300
199,000
214,000
Projects for Assistance in Transition
from Homelessness
HHS
54,809
54,223
54,261
53,313c
—
59,687
65,047
64,917
64,917
Consolidated Runaway and
Homeless Youth Program
HHS
88,725
87,777
87,837
96,128c
—
97,234
97,734
97,539
97,355
—Runaway and Homeless Youth–
Basic Center
HHS
48,786
48,265
48,298
52,860
—
53,469
53,744
53,637
53,536
—Runaway and Homeless Youth–
Transitional Living
HHS
39,939
39,511
39,539
43,268
—
43,765
43,990
43,902
43,819
Runaway and Homeless Youth–
Street Outreach Program
HHS
15,178
15,017
15,027
17,221c
—
17,721
17,971
17,935
17,901
Homeless Assistance Grants
HUD
1,240,511
1,326,600
1,441,600
1,585,990
—h
1,677,000
1,865,000
1,901,000
1,901,000
Program
Education for Homeless Children &
Youth
—Homelessness Prevention and Rapid
Re-housing
FY2009
FY2010
FY2011a
FY2012
1,500,000
Homeless Veterans Reintegration
Program
DOL
20,832
21,780
21,809
23,620c
—
26,330
36,330
36,257
38,185
Transitional Housing Assistance for
Victims of Domestic Violence,
Stalking, or Sexual Assaulti
DOJ
12,333
14,808
14,847
17,390
50,000
18,000
18,000
17,964
25,000
Source: Table prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). Unless otherwise stated, sources of data are agency budget justifications and congressional
appropriations documents. The amounts are enacted values and do not necessarily include all rescissions for each program in each fiscal year.
Notes: Italics indicate amount is subsumed under earlier line item.
CRS-32
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
a.
In FY2011, all discretionary accounts were subject to an across-the-board rescission of 0.2%. Unless otherwise noted, the funding levels in the table have been reduced
by the rescission amount.
b.
P.L. 109-148 provided supplemental FY2006 appropriations of $5 million for assistance to local educational agencies serving homeless children and youth who were
displaced by Hurricane Katrina or Hurricane Rita 1I15, http://www.va.gov/budget/docs/summary/Fy2013_Volume_II-Medical_Programs_Information_Technology.pdf.
Congressional Research Service
25
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
Legislation
Legislation Enacted in the 113th Congress
The Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2013 (VAWA 2013; P.L. 113-4) added
housing rights for victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking,
including a provision that states that an applicant may not be denied public housing assistance on
the basis that the person has been a victim of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault,
or stalking.
VAWA 2013 also reauthorized the Department of Justice Transitional Housing Program at $35
million annually from FY2014 through FY2018. Among other things, VAWA 2013 ensures that
victims receiving Transitional Housing Program assistance are not subject to prohibited activities,
including background checks or clinical evaluations, to determine eligibility for services. VAWA
2013 also specifies that transitional housing support services may include certain services to help
the victim secure employment, including obtaining employment counseling, occupational
training, job retention counseling, and counseling concerning re-entry into the workforce.
The Department of Veterans Affairs Expiring Authorities Act of 2013 (P.L. 113-37) was
enacted on September 30, 2013. The law extended the authorizations for a number of homeless
veterans programs through FY2014: the Homeless Veterans Reintegration Program, Referral and
Counseling Services for Veterans at Risk of Homelessness Who Are Transitioning from Certain
Institutions, the Grant and Per Diem Special Needs grant, and Supportive Services for Veteran
Families. The law also authorized the Grant and Per Diem program through FY2015 and each
year thereafter.
The VA Expiring Authorities Extension Act of 2013 (P.L. 113-59), enacted on December 20,
2013, reauthorized several homeless veterans programs through December 31, 2014: Healthcare
for Homeless Veterans, Acquired Property Sales for Homeless Providers, and the Advisory
Committee on Homeless Veterans.
Active Legislation in the 113th Congress
The Homes for Heroes Act of 2013 (H.R. 384), passed by the House on May 15, 2013, would
create a position in HUD for a Special Assistant for Veterans Affairs to ensure that veterans have
access to housing within each of HUD’s programs and to coordinate HUD programs and activities
that relate to veterans. The Special Assistant would also serve as liaison between HUD and the
VA, as well as HUD and the Interagency Council on Homelessness, and would coordinate with
state and local agencies and organizations that work with veterans. The bill also calls on HUD
and the VA to report annually to Congress on the number of veterans experiencing homelessness
and on HUD activities related to veterans.
The Helping Homeless Veterans Act of 2013 (S. 287) was passed by the Senate on November 6,
2013. As introduced, the bill would have changed the definition of homeless veteran to
incorporate Section 103(b) of the definition as modified by the HEARTH Act. Section 103(b)
includes anyone who is fleeing a situation of domestic violence or other life-threatening
condition. S. 287 was amended at the committee level to incorporate aspects of S. 825 and S.
1058. As amended, S. 287 would additionally allow grants through the Grant and Per Diem
Congressional Research Service
26
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
program to be used to maintain existing facilities (in addition to expanding or modifying them);
would increase the per diem payments for housing units in which veterans move from transitional
to permanent housing through the Transition in Place option; would authorize use of per diem
payments for the dependents of homeless veterans; and would require the VA to report on the
capacity of Grant and Per Diem providers for future planning purposes. The bill would also
expand the population eligible to receive care through the Dental Care for Homeless Veterans
program; give VA the authority to partner with and provide funding to private or public entities
that give legal representation to veterans who are homeless or at risk of homelessness; require
evaluation of the outreach program for veterans being discharged from institutions who are at risk
of homelessness; and reauthorize various programs with expiring authorities.
H.R. 1305, a bill to provide clarification regarding eligibility for services under the
Homeless Veterans Reintegration Program, was marked up and approved by the House
Veterans’ Affairs Committee Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity on April 25, 2013. The bill
would expand eligibility for HVRP to include veterans receiving rental assistance through the
HUD-VASH program and veterans transitioning from incarceration.
The Homeless Veterans Reintegration Program Reauthorization Act of 2013 (H.R. 2150) was
marked up and approved by the House Veterans’ Affairs Committee Subcommittee on Economic
Opportunity on July 18, 2013. The bill would authorize HVRP at $50 million per year through
FY2018.
The Safe Housing for Homeless Veterans Act (H.R. 2065) was marked up and approved by the
House Veterans’ Affairs Committee Subcommittee on Health on July 23, 2013. The bill would
require Grant and Per Diem providers to provide VA with certification that they have satisfied
local code requirements.
Funding
Table 1 shows final appropriation levels for FY2007-FY2014 for the targeted homelessness
programs included in this report with the exception of programs administered by the VA. The
table also contains a column showing appropriations that were made as part of the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act (P.L. 111-5). Table 2 shows actual obligations for the
Department of Veterans Affairs targeted homeless programs for FY2004-FY2012 and estimated
obligations for FY2013.
Congressional Research Service
27
Table 1. Homelessness: Appropriations for Targeted Federal Programs, FY2006-FY2014
(dollars in thousands)
Agency
FY2007
FY2008
FY2009
Stimulus
Act,
P.L. 111-5
ED
61,871
64,067c
70,000
65,427
65,427
65,296
65,173
61,771
65,042
Emergency Food & Shelter
DHS/
FEMA
151,470
153,000
100,000
200,000d
200,000e
119,760
120,000
113,805
120,000
Health Care for the Homelessf
HHS
167,900
174,700c
160,000g
171,700
171,300
215,800
232,500
260,300h
319,500h
Projects for Assistance in
Transition from Homelessness
HHS
54,261
53,313c
—
59,687
65,047
64,917
64,794
61,405
64,794
Consolidated Runaway and
Homeless Youth Program
HHS
87,837
96,128c
—
97,234
97,734
97,539
97,355
91,101
97,000
—Runaway and Homeless Youth–
Basic Center
HHS
48,298
52,860
—
53,469
53,744
53,637
53,536
50,097
—i
—Runaway and Homeless Youth–
Transitional Living
HHS
39,539
43,268
—
43,765
43,990
43,902
43,819
41,004
—i
Runaway and Homeless Youth–
Street Outreach Program
HHS
15,027
17,221c
—
17,721
17,971
17,935
17,901
16,751
17,141
Homeless Assistance Grants
HUD
1,441,600
1,585,990
—j
1,677,000
1,865,000
1,901,000
1,901,000
1,933,293
2,105,000
Program
Education for Homeless Children
& Youth
—Homelessness Prevention and
Rapid Re-housing
FY2009
FY2010
FY2011a
FY2012
FY2013b
FY2014
1,500,000
Homeless Veterans
Reintegration Program
DOL
21,809
23,620c
—
26,330
36,330
36,257
38,185
36,188
38,109
Transitional Housing Assistance
for Victims of Domestic
Violence, Stalking, or Sexual
Assaultk
DOJ
14,847
17,390
50,000
18,000
18,000
17,964
25,000
23,281
24,750
Source: Table prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). Unless otherwise stated, sources of data are agency budget justifications and congressional
appropriations documents. The amounts are enacted values and do not necessarily include all rescissions for each program in each fiscal year.
Notes: Italics indicate amount is subsumed under earlier line item.
CRS-28
a.
In FY2011, all discretionary accounts were subject to an across-the-board rescission of 0.2%. Unless otherwise noted, the funding levels in the table have been reduced
by the rescission amount.
b.
In FY2013, most accounts were subject to an across-the-board rescission of 0.2% as well as reductions due to sequestration. Unless otherwise noted, funding levels in
the table have been reduced to reflect both the rescission and sequestration.
c.
In the FY2008 Consolidated Appropriations Act, P.L. 110-161, Division G, Section 528, an across-the-board rescission of 1.747% was applied to nearly all Departments
of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education programs. The values in the table reflect the rescission.
d.
Funds for the Emergency Food and Shelter program were appropriated as part of the Consolidated Security, Disaster Assistance, and Continuing Appropriations Act
(P.L. 110-329), while appropriations for the remaining programs were part of the FY2009 Omnibus Appropriations Act (P.L. 111-8).
e.
In FY2010, funds for the Emergency Food and Shelter Program were appropriated as part of the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act (P.L. 111-83);
all other programs received appropriations as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act (P.L. 111-117).
f.
The Health Care for the Homeless program is funded under the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), Community Health Centers program. The law
requires that health centers serving special populations, including homeless individuals, receive the same proportion of funds that they received in FY2001 (42 U.S.C.
§254b(r)(2)(B)). For the Health Care for the Homeless program, this is approximately 8.6% of the funds appropriated for the Community Health Centers program.
The appropriation estimate for FY2005 in the table is based on this figure. For FY2006 forward, CRS reliedCRS relies on the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Moyer MaterialsMaterial for estimated allocations.
g.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA, P.L. 111-5) appropriated $500 million for health centers to fund services to patients, as well as $1.5 billion in
infrastructure funding for facility construction and renovation, the purchase of equipment, and acquisition of health information technology. According to HHS, $160
million went to serve homeless individuals. See U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Resources and Technology,
FY2012 Moyer Material, April 2011, p. 30.
h.
FY2013 and FY2014 funding levels for Health Care for the Homeless are estimates. The FY2013 and FY2014 estimates do not reflect sequestration. In FY2014,
mandatory funding for Health Care for the Homeless program was reduced under the Sequestration Order for FY2014 by 7.2%.
i.
The FY2014 Omnibus Appropriations Act and Joint Explanatory Statement did not provide a breakdown between the Basic Center and Transitional Living programs.
j.
Although funds appropriated through ARRA for homelessness prevention and rapid re-housing were distributed using the Emergency Shelter Grants formula, the funds
arewere administered according to different rules than those under the four existing Homeless Assistance Grants.
ik.
Until FY2012, funding was provided as a set-aside under the VAWA STOP grant program.
CRS-33
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
29
Table 2. Homelessness:Targeted VA Program Obligations, FY2004-FY2012FY2013
(dollars in thousands)
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2007
FY2008
FY2009
FY2010
FY2011
FY2012
FY2013
(estimate)
Health Care for
Homeless Veterans
(HCHV)a
42,905
40,357
56,998
71,925
77,656
80,219
109,727
200,808
134,738118,889
137,013
Homeless Providers
Grants and Per Diem
Programb
62,965
62,180
63,621
81,187
114,696
128,073
175,057
148,097
194,477208,046
202,468
Domiciliary Care for
Homeless Veterans
(DCHV)
51,829
57,555
63,592
77,633
96,098
115,373
175,979
221,938
201,304218,962
233,983
Compensated Work
Therapy/Therapeutic
Residence Program
(CWT/TR)
10,240
10,004
19,529
21,514
21,497
22,206
61,205
73,420
57,74373,067
78,250
Services for HUD VA
Supported Housing
(HUD-VASH)
3,375
3,243
3,626
7,487
4,854
26,601
71,137
119,603
201,500169,873
244,602
—
—
—
—
—
218
3,881
60,541
10099,974
300,000
Program
Supportive Services for
Veteran Familiesc
Source: Department of Veterans Affairs budget documents.
a.
Includes funding for the Homeless Chronically Mentally Ill Veterans (HCMI) and the Homeless Comprehensive Service Centers, including mobile centers. A specific
breakdown of obligations among activities is not available.
b.
Does not include funding for Grant and Per Diem Liaisons.
c.
The first awardawards for the Supportive Services for Veteran Families program waswere made in FY2011.
CRS-3430
Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation
Author Contact Information
Libby Perl, Coordinator
Specialist in Housing Policy
eperl@crs.loc.gov, 7-7806
Elayne J. Heisler
Analyst in Health Services
eheislerGail McCallion
Specialist in Social Policy
gmccallion@crs.loc.gov, 7-44537758
Erin Bagalman
Analyst in Health Policy
ebagalman@crs.loc.gov, 7-5345
Gail McCallion
Specialist in Social Policy
gmccallion@crs.loc.gov, 7-7758Francis X. McCarthy
Analyst in Emergency Management Policy
fmccarthy@crs.loc.gov, 7-9533
Adrienne L. Fernandes-Alcantara
Specialist in Social Policy
afernandes@crs.loc.gov, 7-9005
Francis X. McCarthyLisa N. Sacco
Analyst in Emergency Management Policy
fmccarthyIllicit Drugs and Crime Policy
lsacco@crs.loc.gov, 7-95337359
Elayne J. Heisler
Analyst in Health Services
eheisler@crs.loc.gov, 7-4453
Key Policy Staff
Telephone and
Email
Program
Name
Education for Homeless Children and Youths
Gail McCallion
7-7758
gmccallion@crs.loc.gov
Emergency Food and Shelter program
Francis X. McCarthy
7-9533
fmccarthy@crs.loc.gov
Health Centers for the Homeless
Elayne Heisler
7-4453
eheisler@crs.loc.gov
HUD programs and Homeless Veterans programs
Libby Perl
7-7806
eperl@crs.loc.gov
Projects for Assistance in Transition from Homelessness and
SAMHSA Grants
Erin Bagalman
7-5345
ebagalman@crs.loc.gov
Runaway and Homeless Youth programs
Adrienne L. FernandesAlcantara
7-9005
afernandes@crs.loc.gov
Violence Against Women Act programs
Lisa Sacco
7-7359
lsacco@crs.loc.gov
Congressional Research Service
3531