Multilateral Development Banks:
U.S. Contributions FY2000-FY2011FY2013
Rebecca M. Nelson
Analyst in International Trade and Finance
March 11, 2011February 1, 2013
Congressional Research Service
7-5700
www.crs.gov
RS20792
CRS Report for Congress
Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress
Multilateral Development Banks: U.S. Contributions FY2000-FY2011FY2013
Summary
This report shows in tabular form how much the Administration has requested and how much
Congress has appropriated for U.S. payments to the multilateral development banks (MDBs)
since since
2000. It also provides a brief description of the MDBs and the ways they fund their
operations. It
will be updated periodically as annual appropriation figures are known. The title of
this report
will also change annually, as new yearly appropriation figures are added.
As shown in the source note for Tables 2, 3, and 4, the final appropriation figures for FY2011
have not yet been determined. The Treasury Department made one payment to the African
Development Fund (AfDF), however, because the organization was facing serious financial
constraints and the Department had authority under the then-current continuing resolution to
make that payment.
For further information about the MDBs and the relevant U.S. policy process, seeFor FY2013, the Administration has requested funds for several of the non-concessional lending
facilities at the MDBs. Several of the MDBs are in the process of increasing the size of their nonconcessional lending facilities, a process frequently called a “general capital increase” (GCI).
GCIs are relatively unusual, particularly for so many institutions at the same time. Contributions
to the GCIs are expected to be spread out over a five- to eight-year period, depending on the
institution. For most of the institutions, the funds appropriated in FY2012 were the first annual
payment. In addition to funds for the GCIs, the Administration has requested for FY2013 funds
for several MDB concessional lending facilities and more targeted MDB funds, such as those
dedicated to environmental issues. The total Administration’s request for the MDBs is smaller
than its requests in FY2011 and FY2012.
For further information about the MDBs, the GCIs, and relevant U.S. policy process, see:
•
CRS Report R41170, Multilateral Development Banks: Overview and Issues for
Congress, by Rebecca M. Nelson;
•
CRS Report R41672, Multilateral Development Banks: General Capital
Increases, by Martin A. Weiss; and
•
CRS Report R41537, Multilateral Development Banks: How the United States
Makes and Implements Policy, by Jonathan E. SanfordRebecca M. Nelson and Martin A. Weiss.
Congressional Research Service
Multilateral Development Banks: U.S. Contributions FY2000-FY2011FY2013
Contents
U.S. Participation in the MDBs ....................................................................................................... 1
The MDBs and Their Programs ....................................................................................................... 1
Funding MDB Assistance Programs ................................................................................................ 2
U.S. Appropriations for MDBs .....................................................................................................4... 2
Figures
Figure 1. Multilateral Development Banks: Budget Requests and Appropriated Funds,
FY2000–FY2012 – FY2013 .....................................................................................................................4
Tables
Table 1. U.S. Contribution and Voting Shares in the MDBs .........................................................3... 3
Tables
Table 21. Multilateral Development Banks: Budget Requests and Appropriated Funds,
FY2000–FY2004 – FY2004 ........................................................................................................................5 4
Table 32. Multilateral Development Banks: Budget Requests and Appropriated Funds,
FY2005– – FY2009 ........................................................................................................................ 56
Table 43. Multilateral Development Banks: Budget Requests and Appropriated Funds,
FY2010–FY2012 – FY2012 .......................................................................................................................7. 6
Contacts
Author Contact Information .............................................................................................................9 8
Acknowledgments ......................................................................................................................9..... 8
Congressional Research Service
Multilateral Development Banks: U.S. Contributions FY2000-FY2011FY2013
U.S. Participation in the MDBs
The United States is a member of five multilateral development banks (MDBs): the World Bank,
African Development Bank (AfDB), Asian Development Bank (AsDB), European Bank for
Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), and Inter-American Development Bank (IDB). It also
belongs to two similar organizations, the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD)
and the North American Development Bank (NADBank).
The MDBs and Their Programs
The MDBs have similar programs, though they all differ somewhat in their institutional structure
and emphasis. Each has a president and executive board that manages or supervises all of its
programs and operations. Except for the EBRD, which makes only market-based loans, all the
MDBs make both market-based loans to middle-income developing countries and concessional
loans to the poorest countries. Their loans are made to governments or to organizations having
government repayment guarantees. In each MDB, the same staff prepares both the market-based
and the concessional loans, using the same standards and procedures for both. 1 The main
differences between them are the repayment terms and the countries which qualify for them. 2
The MDBs also have specialized facilities which have their own operating staff and management
but report to the bank’s president and executive board. The World Bank’s International Finance
Corporation (IFC) and the IDB’s Inter-American Investment Corporation (IIC) make loans to or
equity investments in private sector firms in developing countries (on commercial terms) without
government repayment guarantees. The AsDB makes similar loans from its market-rate loan
account. The World Bank’s Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA) underwrites
private investments in developing countries (on commercial terms) to protect against noneconomic risk. At the IDB, the Multilateral Investment Fund (MIF) helps Latin American
countries institute policy reforms aimed at stimulating domestic and international investment. It
also funds worker retraining and programs for small- and micro-enterprises. The MIF originated
as part of President Bush’s 1990 Enterprise for the Americas Initiative (EAI).
The NADBank was created by the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) to fund
environmental infrastructure projects in the U.S.-Mexico border region. The International Fund
for Agricultural Development (IFAD), created in 1977, focuses on reducing poverty and hunger
in poor
countries through agricultural development.
Finally, the World Bank also serves as the trustee for several targeted multilateral development
funds, for which the Administration has requested and Congress has appropriated funds. These
multilateral funds include the Clean Technology Fund (CTF), the Strategic Climate Fund (SCF),
the Global Environment Facility (GEF), and the Global Agriculture and Food Security Program
(GAFSP).
1
The International Development Association (IDA) is the World Bank’s concessional loan affiliate. The Asian
Development Fund (AsDF), African Development Fund (AFDF), and Fund for Special Operations (FSO) are the
comparable programs at the AsDB, AfDB, and IDB, respectively.
2
MDB market-based loans cost a little more than the rate the banks pay to borrow funds commercially. IDA and AFDF
charge about 3/4 of 1% annually. The IDB charges 1% to 4% annually, depending on the project and the borrower.
Most borrowers from the concessional programs have per capita incomes of less (often much less) than $900 annually.
Congressional Research Service
1
Multilateral Development Banks: U.S. Contributions FY2000-FY2011FY2013
Funding MDB Assistance Programs
The MDBs’ concessional aid programs are funded with money donated by their wealthier
member country governments. Periodically, as the stock of uncommitted MDB funds begins to
run low, the major donors negotiate a new funding plan that specifies their new contribution
shares.
Loans from the MDBs’ market-rate loan facilities are funded with
money borrowed in world
capital markets. The IFC and IIC fund their loans and equity
investments partly with money
contributed by their members and partly with funds borrowed
from commercial capital markets.
The MDBs’ borrowings are backed by the subscription s of
subscriptions of their member countries. They provide
a small part of their capital subscriptions (3% to 5% of the
total for most MDBs) in the form of
paid-in capital. The rest they subscribe as callable capital.
Callable capital is a contingent liability,
payable only if an MDB becomes bankrupt and lacks
sufficient funds to repay its own creditors.
It cannot be called to provide the banks with additional
loan funds.
Countries’ voting shares are determined mainly by the size of their contributions. The United
States is the largest stockholder in most MDBs, and has maintained this position to preserve veto
power in some institutions over major policy decisions. Japan has provided more to the AsDF and
AfDF, while Nigeria and Egypt have subscribed larger shares in the AfDB. Periodically, as the
stock of uncommitted MDB funds begins to run low, the major donors negotiate a new funding
plan that specifies their new contribution shares.
Table 1 shows the U.S. contribution share and voting share for all MDB programs. In most
banks, countries get a few votes because they are members, regardless of the size of their capital
subscription. Thus, for banks with a large number of small members, the voting share of large
subscribers such as the United States may be a little smaller than their share in providing the
bank’s resources. Voting shares are the same for both market-based and concessional loans in the
AsDB and IDB.
Congressional Research Service
2
Multilateral Development Banks: U.S. Contributions FY2000-FY2011
Table 1. U.S. Contribution and Voting Shares in the MDBs
Contribution Share
Voting Share
World Bank Group
IBRD
16.8%
16.4%
IDA
21.5%
11.2%
IFC
24.1%
23.5%
MIGA
18.5%
14.9%
AsDB
14.2%
11.7%
AsDF
10.6%
12.8%
Asian Development Bank
African Development Bank
AfDB
6.4%
6.4%
AfDF
12.7%
6.1%
Inter-American Development Bank
IDB
28.9%
30.0%
FSO
49.6%
30.0%
IIC
24.9%
20.3%
MIF
37.8%
29.3%
EBRD
5.1%
10.2%
IFAD
14.3%
8.4%
NADBank
50.0%
50.0%
Source: MDB Annual Reports.
In IDA, by contrast, the donors have separated the issues of voting power and contributions. In
recent decades, they have chosen not to expand their voting share as they contribute new funds to
IDA. Thus, while the United States, Canada, Japan, the countries of the European Union, and the
wealthy Arab oil states have donated 99% of IDA’s resources, they have 65% of the vote. This is
more than enough to protect their interests, as decisions are reached by majority vote. The
arrangement diffuses possible tensions by giving the developing countries a sense that their
voices are heard.
Before 1976, the United States was the only significant contributor to the IDB’s Fund for Special
Operations. Nonregional countries have since joined the IDB and the FSO has become a much
smaller program and the U.S. share has declined substantially. The African Development Bank
controls 50% of the vote in the AFDF, though it has contributed only about 1% of the
concessional loan program’s resources. This maintains a semblance of African control. The
interests of the donors are protected by the fact that a three-quarters majority is required to
approve AFDF loans.
Congressional Research Service
3
Multilateral Development Banks: U.S. Contributions FY2000-FY2011
U.S. Appropriations for MDBs
Figure 1 and Table 2, Table 3, and Table 4 show the amounts the Administration has requested
and Congress has appropriated annually since FY2000 to the multilateral banks. Note that the
figure and table do not include callable capital. Since the early 1980s, Congress has authorized
but not appropriated callable capital.
As Figure 1 illustrates, the Administration’s budget request for U.S. contributions to the MDBs
has increased in recent years, from $1,499 million in 2008 to $3,144 million in 2012. The amount
appropriated has also increased, from $1,277 million in 2008 to $2,044 million in 2010. For
FY2011, the government is currently operating under a continuing resolution, and the final
appropriation figures for the year are not yet known. According to the Treasury Department, a
payment of $26.3 million was made to the African Development Fund (ADF), however, in light
of the organization’s current financial constrains and the interim spending authority which the
continuing resolution provides. The relevant FY2011 appropriations legislation is tracked in CRS
Report R41228, State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs: FY2011 Budget and
Appropriations, by Marian Leonardo Lawson, Susan B. Epstein, and Tamara J. Resler.
Figure 1. Multilateral Development Banks: Budget Requests and
Appropriated Funds, FY2000–FY2012
3,500
Requested
Appropriated
3,000
Million $
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
0
Source: Derived from annual appropriation legislation and Treasury Department budget presentation
documents.
Congressional Research Service
4
Table 2. Multilateral Development Banks: Budget Requests and Appropriated Funds, FY2000–FY2004
(Million $)
2000
Req.
2001
Approp.
Req.
2002
Approp.
Req.
2003
Approp.
Req.
2004
Approp.
Req.
Approp.
World Bank Group
Int’l Bank for Reconstruction & Development (IBRD)
Int’l Development Association (IDA)
U.S. Appropriations for MDBs
Figure 1 and Tables 2, 3, and 4 show the amounts the Administration has requested and
Congress has appropriated annually since FY2000 to the multilateral banks. Note that the figure
and table do not include callable capital. Since the early 1980s, Congress has authorized but not
appropriated callable capital.
As Figure 1 illustrates, the Administration’s budget request for U.S. contributions to the MDBs
has increased in recent years, from $1,499 million for FY2008 to $3,144 million for FY2012. The
amount appropriated, while not meeting the full request of the Administration, has also increased,
from $1,277 million for FY2008 to $2,448 million for FY2012. The Administration’s request for
FY2013 is smaller than for the previous two years, totaling $2,625 million. The relevant FY2012
appropriations legislation is tracked in CRS Report R41905, State, Foreign Operations, and
Related Programs: FY2012 Budget and Appropriations, by Susan B. Epstein and Marian
Leonardo Lawson.
Of note in FY2012, the Administration requested and Congress appropriated funds for several of
the non-concessional lending facilities at the MDBs. Several of the MDBs are in the process of
increasing the size of their non-concessional lending facilities, a process frequently called a
“general capital increase” (GCI). GCIs are relatively unusual, particularly for so many institutions
at the same time. Contributions to the GCIs are expected to be spread out over a five- to eightyear period, depending on the institution. For most of the institutions, the FY2012 funds are the
first annual payment. In FY2012, Congress also appropriated funds for several MDB
concessional lending facilities and more targeted MDB funds, such as those dedicated to
environmental issues.
Congressional Research Service
2
Multilateral Development Banks: U.S. Contributions FY2000-FY2013
Figure 1. Multilateral Development Banks: Budget Requests and Appropriated
Funds, FY2000 – FY2013
Requested
Appropriated
3,500
3,000
Million US$
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
0
Source and Notes: See Tables 1, 2, and 3.
Congressional Research Service
3
Multilateral Development Banks: U.S. Contributions FY2000-FY2013
Table 1. Multilateral Development Banks: Budget Requests and Appropriated Funds, FY2000 – FY2004
(Million $)
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Request
Approp.
Request
Approp.
Request
Approp.
Request
Approp.
Request
Approp.
803.4
771.3
835.6
773.3
803.4
792.4
874.3
844.5
976.8
907.8
10.0
4.0
16.0
10.0
10.0
5.0
3.6
1.6
4.0
1.1
143.3
35.8
175.6
107.8
107.5
100.5
177.8
146.9
185.0
138.4
Asian Development Bank (AsDB)
13.7
13.7
Asian Development Fund (AsDF)
177.0
77.0
125.0
71.8
103.0
98.0
147.4
97.2
151.9
143.6
African Development Bank (AfDB)
5.1
4.1
6.1
6.1
5.1
5.1
5.1
5.1
5.1
5.1
African Development Fund (AfDF)
127.0
127.0
100.0
99.8
100.0
100.0
118.1
107.4
118.1
112.1
25.6
25.6
Inter-American Investment Corp (IIC)b
25.0
16.0
34.0
24.9
25.0
18.0
30.4
18.2
30.9
Multilateral Investment Fund (MIF)b
28.5
25.9
10.0
29.6
24.4
32.6
24.9
European Bank for Reconstruction and Development
Development (EBRD)
35.8
35.8
35.7
35.8
35.8
35.8
35.6
35.4
35.2
5.0
20.0
20.0
15.0
14.9
15.0
14.9
1,144.4
1,209.8
1,174.8
1,437.1
1,295.8
1,554.9
1,383.0
World Bank Group
Int’l Bank for Reconstruction & Development
(IBRD)
Int’l Development Association (IDA)
Int’l Finance Corporation (IFC)
Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA)
Global Environmental Facility
Clean Technology
(GEF)a
Funda
(GEF)a
Clean Technology Funda
Strategic Climate Funda
Global Agriculture and Food Security Program
(GAFSP)a
Regional/Targeted Development Banks
Inter-American Development Bank (IDB)
Fund for Special Operations
(FSO)b
35.8
International Fund for Agricultural Development
(IFAD)
TOTAL MDB APPROPRIATION
CRS-54
1,394.4
1,110.3
1,353.9
Multilateral Development Banks: U.S. Contributions FY2000-FY2013
Table 2Table 3. Multilateral Development Banks: Budget Requests and Appropriated Funds, FY2005–FY2009
(Million $)
2005
2006 – FY2009
2006
2005
2007
2008
2009
Request
Approp.
Request
Approp.
Request
Approp.
Request
Approp.
Request
Approp.
1,061.3
843.2
950.0
940.5
950.0
940.5
1,060.0
942.3
1,277.0
1,115.0
1.7
1.3
107.5
79.2
81.1
80.0
80.0
World Bank Group
Int’l Bank for Reconstruction & Development
(IBRD)
Int’l Development Association (IDA)
Int’l Finance Corporation (IFC)
Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA)
Global Environmental Facility
Clean Technology
Strategic Climate
(GEF)a
120.7
106.6
1.1
56.3
79.2
106.8
Clean Technology Funda
400.0
Strategic Climate Funda
Funda
Global Agriculture and Food Security Program
(GAFSP)a
Regional/Targeted Development Banks
Asian Development Bank (AsDB)
Asian Development Fund (AsDF)
23.8
112.2
99.2
115.3
99.0
115.3
99.0
133.9
74.5
115.3
105.0
African Development Bank (AfDB)
5.1
4.1
5.6
3.6
5.0
3.6
2.0
2.0
African Development Fund (AfDF)
118.0
105.2
135.7
134.3
135.7
134.3
140.6
134.6
156.1
150.0
1.7
1.7
29.2
24.8
25.0
25.0
0.01
0.01
0.8
Inter-American Development Bank (IDB)
Fund for Special Operations (FSO)b
Inter-American Investment Corp (IIC)b
7.3
Multilateral Investment Fund
(MIF)b
7.3
25.0
10.9
1.7
1.7
European Bank for Reconstruction and
Development (EBRD)
35.4
35.2
1.0
1.0
International Fund for Agricultural Development
(IFAD)
15.0
14.9
15.0
14.9
18.0
14.8
18.1
17.9
18.0
18.0
1,492.7
1,219.2
1,335.3
1,277.2
1,329.0
1,273.2
1,499.0
1,277.3
2,071.3
1,493.8
TOTAL MDB APPROPRIATION
CRS-6
25.0
1.7
Table 45
25.0
1.7
Multilateral Development Banks: U.S. Contributions FY2000-FY2013
Table 3. Multilateral Development Banks: Budget Requests and Appropriated Funds, FY2010–FY2012
(Million $)
– FY2012
2011
2010
Request
2011
Approp.
Request
2012
Approp. c
Request2012c
Approp.
2013
Request
Approp.
Request
117.4
117.4
187.0
World Bank Group
117.4
Int’l Bank for Reconstruction & Development (IBRD)
Int’l Development Association (IDA)
1,320.0
1,262.5
1,285.0
1,232.5
1,358.5
1,325.0
1,358.5
86.5
86.5
175.0
89.8
143.8
89.8
129.4
143.8
Clean Technology Funda
500.0
300.0
400.0
400184.6
400.0
184.6
185.0
Strategic Climate Fund
100.0
75.0
235.0
190.0
408.4
308.0
106.6
106.6
115.3
115.3
Int’l Development Association (IDA)
49.9
190.0
49.9
50.0
408.4
99.8
308.0
135.0
134.0
106.6
106.4
106.6
106.6
106.8
115.3
0.0
115.3
100.0
115.3
32.4
32.4
32.4
195.0
172.5
195.0
102.0
75.0
102.0
Int’l Finance Corporation (IFC)
Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA)
Global Environmental Facility (GEF)a
Global Agriculture and Food Security Program
(GAFSP)a
Regional/Targeted Development Banks
Asian Development Bank (AsDB)
115.3
105.0
Asian Development Fund (AsDF)
32.4105.0
African Development Bank (AfDB)
African Development Fund (AfDF)
159.9
155.0
155.9
26.3
195.0
102.0109.8
Inter-American Development Bank (IDB)
Fund for Special Operations (FSO)b
Inter-American Investment Corp (IIC)b
Multilateral Investment Fund (MIF) b
4.7
4.7
21.0
20.421.0
20.4
4.7
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
29.5
30.0
30.0
30.0
2,341.4
2,043.7
2,957.2
1,948.3
3,144.4
2,447.9
2,6253,144.4
European Bank for Reconstruction and Development
(EBRD)
International Fund for Agricultural Development
(IFAD)
TOTAL MDB APPROPRIATION
CRS-7
Approp.
Source (Tables 2, 3, and 4)Source: Derived from annual appropriation legislation and Treasury Department budget presentation documents.
Notes (Tables 2, 3, and 4)
CRS-6
Approp.
Multilateral Development Banks: U.S. Contributions FY2000-FY2013
Notes: Data includes rescissions. Data does not include “callable capital,” or funds that the United States has committed to provide to the MDBs if
they need it. Since the
early 1980s, callable capital has been authorized, but not appropriated. To date, there has never been a call on callable capital. There has not been a
request or
appropriations for NADBank during the time period covered by this table. Totals may not add due to rounding.
a. The World Bank serves as the trustee for these multilateral development funds.
b. Part of the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) Group.
c. According to the Treasury Department, most funding for MDB programs during FY2011 has been held in abeyance. The government is currently operating under a
continuing resolution, and the final appropriation figures for the year are not yet known. A payment of $26.3 million was made to the African Development Fund, however,
in light of that organization’s current financial constraints and the interim spending authority which the continuing resolution provides.
CRS-8In addition, $174.5 million was also requested and appropriated for the Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative (MDRI) in FY2012. Specifically, $7.5 million was requested and
appropriated for the FY2012 AfDF MDRI commitment; $76 million for the FY2012 IDA-16 MDRI commitment; and $91 million for the IDA-15 MDRI commitment.
CRS-7
Multilateral Development Banks: U.S. Contributions FY2000-FY2011FY2013
Author Contact Information
Rebecca M. Nelson
Analyst in International Trade and Finance
rnelson@crs.loc.gov, 7-6819
Acknowledgments
A previous version of this report was written by Jonathan E. Sanford, former CRS Specialist in
International Trade and Finance. Amber WilhemWilhelm, Graphics Specialist, prepared the figure.
Congressional Research Service
98