< Back to Current Version

Senate Committee Party Ratios: 98th-118th Congresses

Changes from November 23, 2010 to December 7, 2015

This page shows textual changes in the document between the two versions indicated in the dates above. Textual matter removed in the later version is indicated with red strikethrough and textual matter added in the later version is indicated with blue.


Senate Committee Party Ratios: 98th-114th Congresses

December 7, 2015 (RL34752) Jump to Main Text of Report

Contents

Tables

Summary

The party ratio in the Senate standing committees is the proportional number of members of each party caucus assigned to each committee. Determining committee sizes, ratios, and assignments are among the first actions taken after a general election and at the beginning of a Congress.

The standing rules of the Senate are silent on the subject of committee party ratios. The apportionment of committee seats results from discussions between majority and minority party leadership. In general, it has been the practice of the Senate to apportion committee seats to the majority and minority parties in a manner that corresponds closely to the party strength in the full chamber. Findings from this study indicate that the majority party ratios on committees roughly approximate the majority party strength in the Senate chamber, regardless of which party has been in control.

This report shows Senate committee party ratios for 17 Congresses, covering the period of the 98th Congress (1983-1985) through the 114th Congress (2015-2017).

Table 1 shows a comparison of majority party strength in the Senate chamber with total majority committee seats for the 98th Congress through the 114th Congress. Unfilled seats on committees (if so noted in the Secretary of the Senate's lists or the
Senate Committee Party Ratios: 94th - 111th Congresses Lorraine H. Tong Analyst in American National Government November 23, 2010 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL34752 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Senate Committee Party Ratios: 94th - 111th Congresses Summary The standing rules of the Senate are silent on the subject of committee party ratios. The apportionment of committee seats results from discussions between majority and minority party leadership. Committee assignments and ratios are among the first decisions made at the beginning of a Congress. The leaders implement any ratio agreement through resolutions electing Senators to committees. In general, it has been the practice of the Senate to apportion committee seats to the majority and minority parties in a manner that corresponds closely to the party strength in the full chamber. Findings from this study indicate that the majority party ratios on committees roughly approximate the majority party strength in the Senate chamber, regardless of which party is in control. This report provides an overview of Senate standing committee sizes and ratios in 18 Congresses, covering the period of the 94th through the 111th Congresses (1975-2011). Also included are data on select committees with legislative jurisdiction. This report also discusses trends and compares party ratios in selected Congresses. During the 18 Congresses examined, the sizes of committees have generally increased as have the number of committee assignments a Senator typically receives. Each table includes the standing committees and select committees as established and titled in each Congress. For each Congress, a table presents the party divisions in the Senate and the total number of seats (1) in the chamber, (2) in committees, (3) on each committee, (4) assigned to the majority and minority parties and to Independents and other parties (where present), and (5) majority and minority party seats on each committee. Data are also provided for the majority-minority seat margin in the chamber, on each committee, as well as the total seat margin for all standing committees and the select committee. A comparison of the Senate majority caucus size in the chamber and in committees is provided in a separate table. The committee ratios data for the 99th through 111th Congresses are taken from the official committee lists for each Congress issued by the Secretary of the Senate; the Congressional Directory is the source for the 94th through 98th Congresses. The earliest editions of these primary documents are the sources for the data, although anomalies in some Congresses, such as delays in seating a Senator due to contested elections, necessitated using later versions of the publications. Use of other versions of these publications, and alternate sources or methodologies, may yield different results. For example, using data from other sources or time frames reflecting the number of Senators representing a particular party may change during a Congress, due to the death or resignation of a Senator, or as a consequence of a Senator changing party affiliation, and could lead to alternate findings. Party division numbers reflect party strength as indicated in the Secretary’s lists and the Congressional Directory. Different versions of the Secretary’s list and the Congressional Directory, or the use of alternate sources or methodologies, may yield different results. This report will be updated in the 112th Congress. Congressional Research Service Senate Committee Party Ratios: 94th - 111th Congresses Contents Sources and Method....................................................................................................................1 Comparative Analysis of Ratios ..................................................................................................2 110th and 111th Congresses.....................................................................................................3 Committee Sizes ...................................................................................................................3 Committee Caucus Seat Margins...........................................................................................4 Prospects for the Future...............................................................................................................5 Tables Table 1. Comparison of Senate Majority Caucus Members in Chamber and Committees: 94th -111th Congresses...............................................................................................................6 Table 2. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 111th Congress (2009-2011)..........................................7 Table 3. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 110th Congress (2007-2009) .........................................8 Table 4. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 109th Congress (2005-2007) .........................................9 Table 5. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 108th Congress (2003-2005 ) ...................................... 10 Table 6. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 107th Congress (2001-2003) ....................................... 11 Table 7. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 106th Congress (1999-2001) ....................................... 12 Table 8. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 105th Congress (1997-1999) ....................................... 13 Table 9. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 104th Congress (1995-1997) ....................................... 14 Table 10. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 103rd Congress (1993-1995) ..................................... 15 Table 11. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 102nd Congress (1991-1993)..................................... 16 Table 12. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 101st Congress (1989-1991)...................................... 17 Table 13. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 100th Congress (1987-1989) ..................................... 18 Table 14. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 99th Congress (1985-1987) ....................................... 19 Table 15. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 98th Congress (1983-1985) ....................................... 20 Table 16. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 97th Congress (1981-1983) ....................................... 21 Table 17. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 96th Congress (1979-1981) ....................................... 22 Table 18. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 95th Congress (1977-1979) ....................................... 23 Table 19. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 94th Congress (1975-1977) ....................................... 24 Contacts Author Contact Information ...................................................................................................... 25 Congressional Research Service Senate Committee Party Ratios: 94th - 111th Congresses T he standing rules of the Senate are silent on the subject of committee party ratios. Committee assignments and ratios are among the first decisions made at the beginning of a Congress. The majority and minority leaders, through consultation and negotiation, determine the relative apportionment of the committee seats to each party. The leaders implement this agreement through resolutions electing Senators to committees. This report provides an overview and data on Senate standing committee party ratios for 18 Congresses covering the 94th through the 111th Congresses (1975-2011). In addition to the standing committees, data on permanent select committees with legislative jurisdiction are also included. A comparison of the Senate majority caucus1 size in the chamber and in committees is provided in a separate table.2 Sources and Method Assignment data for each Senate committee for the 94th through the 111th Congresses in these 18 Congresses were taken from the official committee assignment lists issued by the Secretary of the Senate, after assignments were made in each Congress.3 Data for the 107th Congress reflect committee ratios established after the Senate reorganization in June 2001 as a result of the switch in party control.4 The numbers on overall party strength in the Senate for each Congress were taken from the same lists issued by the Secretary of the Senate for the 99th through 111th Congresses.5 The Secretary of the Senate began issuing these committee lists in the 99th Congress, thus, data for the 94th through 98th Congresses were taken from the Congressional Directory.6 The data in this report are from the earliest available complete information of each Congress contained in these two primary documents.7 Vacancies on committees (if so noted in the secretaries’ lists or the Congressional Directory) are counted in individual and overall committee totals for consistency.

Tables 2-18 show the following for each of the 17 Congresses examined, by majority, minority, and Independents (where present):

  • Senate party breakdown and majority margin;
  • Total committee seats, majority and minority committee seats, and majority margin;
  • The standing and select committees (with legislative jurisdiction) as established and named in each Congress;
  • Committee seats allocated to the majority and minority parties, including Independents (where present), for each committee;
  • Majority-minority seat margin for each committee.

The committee ratios data for the 99th through 114th Congresses are taken from the official committee lists for each Congress issued by the Secretary of the Senate; the Congressional Directory is the source for the 98th Congress. The earliest editions of these primary documents are the sources for the data, although anomalies in some Congresses, such as a delay in seating a Senator due to a contested election, sometimes necessitated using later versions of the publications. Party strength in each Congress reflects numbers found in the Secretary's lists and the Congressional Directory. Different versions of the Secretary's list and the Congressional Directory, or the use of alternate sources or methodologies, could yield different results.

This report will be updated to reflect Senate committee party ratios in the 115th Congress.

Senate Committee Party Ratios: 98th-114th Congresses

Introduction

The party ratio in the Senate standing committees is the proportional number of members of each party caucus assigned to each committee. Determining sizes, ratios, and committee assignments are among the first actions taken after a general election and at the beginning of a Congress.

The standing rules of the Senate are silent on the subject of committee party ratios; the apportionment of committee seats results from discussions beginning in the early organization period between majority and minority party leadership.1 In general, the result of these discussions has been to apportion total committee seats to the majority and minority parties in a manner that corresponds to the party strength in the full chamber. A finding of this report indicates that the majority party ratios on committees roughly approximate the majority party strength in the Senate chamber, regardless of which party has been in control.

This report shows Senate committee party ratios for 17 Congresses, covering the period of the 98th Congress (1983-1985) through the 114th Congress (2015-2017). In addition to the standing committees, data on permanent select committees with legislative jurisdiction are also included. An additional table (Table 1) provides a comparison of majority party strength in the Senate chamber and total committee seats. Sources and Method The data presented in this report are drawn from the official committee assignment lists issued by the Secretary of the Senate, after assignments were made in each Congress.2 Data for the 107th Congress reflect committee ratios established after the Senate reorganization in June 2001 as a result of the end of power sharing.3 For the 99th through 114th Congresses, data on overall party strength in the Senate for each Congress were taken from the same lists.4 Overall party strength data for the 98th Congress were taken from the Congressional Directory. The data in this report are from the earliest available complete information of each Congress contained in these two primary documents.5 Table 1 shows a comparison of majority party strength in the Senate chamber with total majority committee seats for the 98th Congress (1983-1985) through the 114th Congress (2015-2017). Unfilled seats on committees (if so noted in the Secretaries' lists or the Congressional Directory) are counted in individual and overall committee totals for consistency.

Tables 2-18 show the following for each of the 17 Congresses examined, by majority, minority, and Independents (where present):

  • Senate party breakdown and majority margin
  • Total committee seats, majority and minority committee seats, and majority margin
  • The standing and select committees (with legislative jurisdiction) as established and named in each Congress
  • Committee seats allocated to the majority and minority parties, including Independents (where present), for each committee
  • Majority-minority seat margin for each committee.
Table 1. Comparison of Senate Majority Conference Members in Chamber and Committees: 98th -114th Congresses (1983-2017)

Congress

Majority Party

Majority Conference % of Senate Chamber

Majority Conference % Total Committee Seats

% Difference of Majority Conference Between Senate Chamber and Total Committee Seats

114th

Republican

54.0%

54.3%

0.3%

113th

Democrat

54.0%

53.5%

-0.5%

112th

Democrat

53.0%

53.7%

0.7%

111th

Democrat

60.0%

58.3%

-1.7%

110th

Democrat

51.0%

52.4%

1.4%

109th

Republican

55.0%

55.0%

0.0%

108th

Republican

51.0%

52.4%

1.4%

107th

Democrat

51.0%

52.4%

1.4%

106th

Republican

55.0%

55.2%

0.2%

105th

Republican

55.0%

55.2%

0.2%

104th

Republican

53.0%

54.4%

1.4%

103rd

Democrat

56.0%

55.8%

-0.2%

102nd

Democrat

57.0%

56.6%

-0.4%

101st

Democrat

55.0%

55.0%

0.0%

100th

Democrat

54.0%

54.8%

0.8%

99th

Republican

53.0%

53.8%

0.8%

98th

Republican

54.0%

54.7%

0.7%

Source: Data presented in this table are taken from Table 2 through Table 18; sources are cited for each table. Data in this table include Independents who caucused with the majority party. The second-to-last column presents the percentage of total committee seats for the majority conference.

Table 2. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 114th Congress (2015-2017)  

Total

Distribution of Seats

Majority-Minority Conference Seat Margin    

Majority (R)

Minority (D)

Independent (I)

 

Total Senators

100

54

44

2

8

Total Committee Seats

376

204

162

10

32

Committees

Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

20

11

9

 

2

Appropriations

30

16

14

 

2

Armed Services

26

14

11

1

2

Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

22

12

10

 

2

Budget

22

12

8

2

2

Commerce, Science, and Transportation

24

13

11

 

2

Energy and Natural Resources

22

12

8

2

2

Environment and Public Works

20

11

8

1

2

Finance

26

14

12

 

2

Foreign Relations

19

10

9

 

1

Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

22

12

9

1

2

Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

16

9

7

 

2

Indian Affairs

14

8

6

 

2

Judiciary

20

11

9

 

2

Rules and Administration

18

10

7

1

2

Small Business and Entrepreneurship

19

10

9

 

1

Veterans' Affairs

15

8

6

1

1

Select Committee on Ethics

6

3

3

 

0

Select Committee on Intelligence

15

8

6

1

1

Source: The Senate of the United States Committee and Subcommittee Assignments for the One Hundred Fourteenth Congress, Prepared Under the Direction of Julie E. Adams, Secretary of the Senate, by John J. Merlino, Legislative Clerk, May 13, 2015 (Washington: GPO, 2015), S. Pub. 114-5.

Notes: Senators who caucused with the minority (Democrats): Senator Bernard Sanders, an Independent, and Senator Angus King, an Independent. Margins are calculated by adding these Senators' seats to the minority seats.

The Special Committee on Aging is the only other Senate committee to exist in the 114th Congress (exclusive of Senate assignments to joint committees). It has existed as a permanent committee since 1977. In the 114th Congress, it has total of 20 committee members, 11 Republicans, and 9 Democrats.

Table 3. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 113th Congress (2013-2015)  

Total

Distribution of Seats

Majority-Minority Conference Seat Margin    

Majority (D)

Minority (R)

Independent (I)

 

Total Senators

100

52

46

2

8

Total Committee Seats

367

192

166

9

35

Committees

Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

20

11

9

 

2

Appropriations

30

16

14

 

2

Armed Services

26

13

12

1

2

Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

22

12

10

 

2

Budget

22

10

10

2

2

Commerce, Science, and Transportation

24

13

11

 

2

Energy and Natural Resources

22

11

10

1

2

Environment and Public Works

18

9

8

1

2

Finance

24

13

11

 

2

Foreign Relations

18

10

8

 

2

Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

22

11

10

1

2

Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

16

9

7

 

2

Indian Affairs

14

8

6

 

2

Judiciary

18

10

8

 

2

Rules and Administration

18

9

8

1

2

Small Business and Entrepreneurship

18

10

8

 

2

Veterans' Affairs

14

7

6

1

2

Select Committee on Ethics

6

3

3

 

0

Select Committee on Intelligence

15

7

7

1

1

Source: The Senate of the United States Committee and Subcommittee Assignments for the One Hundred Thirteenth Congress, Prepared Under the Direction of Nancy Erickson, Secretary of the Senate, by Kathleen Alvarez Tritak, Legislative Clerk, January 30, 2014 (Washington: GPO, 2014), S. Pub. 113-14.

Notes: Senators who caucused with the majority (Democrats): Senator Bernard Sanders, an Independent, and Senator Angus King, an Independent. Margins are calculated by adding these Senators' seats to the majority seats.

The Special Committee on Aging was the only other Senate committee to exist in the 113th Congress (exclusive of Senate assignments to joint committees). It has existed as a permanent committee since 1977. In the 113th Congress, it had total of 20 committee members, 11 Democrats, and 9 Republicans.

Table 4. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 112th Congress (2011-2013)  

Total

Distribution of Seats

Majority-Minority Conference Seat Margin    

Majority (D)

Minority (R)

Indp.-Dem.

Indp.

 

Total Senators

100

51

47

1

1

6

Total Committee Seats

374

193

173

3

5

28

Committees

Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

21

11

10

   

1

Appropriations

30

16

14

   

2

Armed Services

26

13

12

1

 

2

Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

22

12

10

   

2

Budget

23

11

11

 

1

1

Commerce, Science, and Transportation

25

13

12

   

1

Energy and Natural Resources

22

11

10

 

1

2

Environment and Public Works

18

9

8

 

1

2

Finance

24

13

11

   

2

Foreign Relations

19

10

9

   

1

Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

22

11

10

 

1

2

Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

17

8

8

1

 

1

Indian Affairs

14

8

6

   

2

Judiciary

18

10

8

   

2

Rules and Administration

18

10

8

   

2

Small Business and Entrepreneurship

19

9

9

1

 

1

Veterans' Affairs

15

7

7

 

1

1

Select Committee on Ethics

6

3

3

   

0

Select Committee on Intelligence

15

8

7

   

1

Source: The Senate of the United States Committee and Subcommittee Assignments for the One Hundred Twelfth Congress, Prepared Under the Direction of Nancy Erickson, Secretary of the Senate, by Kathleen Alvarez Tritak, Legislative Clerk, April 8, 2011 (Washington: GPO, 2011), S. Pub. 112-6.

Notes: Senators who caucused with the majority (Democrats): Senator Joseph Lieberman, an Independent-Democrat, and Senator Bernard Sanders, an Independent. Margins are calculated by adding these Senators' seats to the majority seats.

The Special Committee on Aging was the only other Senate committee to exist in the 112th Congress (exclusive of Senate assignments to joint committees). It has existed as a permanent committee since 1977. In the 112th Congress, it has total of 21 committee members, 11 Democrats and 10 Republicans.

Table 5. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 111th Congress (2009-2011)  

Total

Distribution of Seats

Majority-Minority Conference Seat Margin    

Majority (D)

Minority (R)

Indp.-Dem.

Indp.

 

Total Senators

100

58

40

1

1

20

Total Committee Seats

379

213

158

3

5

63

Committees

Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

21

12

9

   

3

Appropriations

30

18

12

   

6

Armed Services

26

14

11

1

 

4

Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

23

13

10

   

3

Budget

23

12

10

 

1

3

Commerce, Science, and Transportation

25

14

11

   

3

Energy and Natural Resources

23

12

10

 

1

3

Environment and Public Works

19

11

7

 

1

5

Finance

23

13

10

   

3

Foreign Relations

19

11

8

   

3

Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

23

12

10

 

1

3

Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

17

9

7

1

 

3

Indian Affairs

15

9

6

   

3

Judiciary

19

12

7

   

5

Rules and Administration

19

11

8

   

3

Small Business and Entrepreneurship

19

10

8

1

 

3

Veterans' Affairs

15

9

5

 

1

5

Select Committee on Ethics

6

3

3

   

0

Select Committee on Intelligence

14

8

6

   

2

Source: The Senate of the United States Committee and Subcommittee Assignments for the One Hundred Eleventh Congress, Prepared Under the Direction of Nancy Erickson, Secretary of the Senate, by Kathleen Alvarez Tritak, Legislative Clerk, October 19, 2009 (Washington: GPO, 2009), S. Pub. 111-13. (An earlier version dated June 3, 2009 (S. Pub. 111-9), listed 99 Senators while the result of the Minnesota election was not yet resolved.)

Notes: Data in this table reflect the results of a contested election. After the June 30, 2009, Minnesota State Supreme Court ruling, Senator Al Franken was sworn into office on July 7, 2009. Senator Arlen Specter changed his party affiliation from Republican to Democrat on April 30, 2009.

Senator Scott Brown was elected to the Senate in a January 19, 2010, special election, and was sworn into office on February 4, 2010. After that election, the party division changed to 57 (Democrats) and 41 (Republicans).

Senators who caucused with the majority (Democrats): Senator Joseph Lieberman, an Independent-Democrat, and Senator Bernard Sanders, an Independent. Margins are calculated by adding these Senators' seats to the majority seats.

Table 6. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 110th Congress (2007-2009)  

Total

Distribution of Seats

Majority-Minority Conference Seat Margin    

Majority (D)

Minority (R)

Indp.-Dem.

Indp.

 

Total Senators

100

49

49

1

1

2

Total Committee Seats

372

186

177

4

5

18

Committees

Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

21

11

10

   

1

Appropriations

29

15

14

   

1

Armed Services

25

12

12

1

 

1

Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

21

11

10

   

1

Budget

23

11

11

 

1

1

Commerce, Science, and Transportation

23

12

11

   

1

Energy and Natural Resources

23

11

11

 

1

1

Environment and Public Works

19

8

9

1

1

1

Finance

21

11

10

   

1

Foreign Relations

21

11

10

   

1

Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

21

10

10

 

1

1

Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

17

8

8

1

 

1

Indian Affairs

15

8

7

   

1

Judiciary

19

10

9

   

1

Rules and Administration

19

10

9

   

1

Small Business and Entrepreneurship

19

9

9

1

 

1

Veterans' Affairs

15

7

7

 

1

1

Select Committee on Ethics

6

3

3

   

0

Select Committee on Intelligence

15

8

7

   

1

Source: The Senate of the United States Committee and Subcommittee Assignments for the One Hundred Tenth Congress, Prepared Under the Direction of Nancy Erickson, Secretary of the Senate, by David J. Tinsley, Legislative Clerk, April 2, 2007 (Washington: GPO, 2007), S. Pub. 110-5.

Note: Independent Members caucused with the majority (Democrats): Senator Joseph I. Lieberman of Connecticut was reelected in 2006 as an Independent, and became an Independent-Democrat. Senator Bernard Sanders of Vermont was elected as an Independent.

Table 7. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 109th Congress (2005-2007)    

Distribution of Seats

Majority-Minority Conference Seat Margin  

Total

Majority (R)

Minority (D)

Indp.

 

Total Senators

100

55

44

1

10

Total Committee Seats

353

194

155

4

35

Committees

Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

20

11

9

 

2

Appropriations

28

15

13

 

2

Armed Services

24

13

11

 

2

Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

20

11

9

 

2

Budget

22

12

10

 

2

Commerce, Science, and Transportation

22

12

10

 

2

Energy and Natural Resources

22

12

10

 

2

Environment and Public Works

18

10

7

1

2

Finance

20

11

8

1

2

Foreign Relations

18

10

8

 

2

Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

20

11

8

1

2

Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

16

9

7

 

2

Indian Affairs

14

8

6

 

2

Judiciary

18

10

8

 

2

Rules and Administration

18

10

8

 

2

Small Business and Entrepreneurship

18

10

8

 

2

Veterans' Affairs

14

8

5

1

2

Select Committee on Ethics

6

3

3

 

0

Select Committee on Intelligence

15

8

7

 

1

Source: The Senate of the United States Committee and Subcommittee Assignments for the One Hundred Ninth Congress, Prepared Under the Direction of Emily J. Reynolds, Secretary of the Senate, by David J. Tinsley, Legislative Clerk, April 25, 2005 (Washington: GPO, 2005), S. Pub. 109-10.

Note: Senator James M. Jeffords, an Independent, caucused with the minority (Democrats).

Table 8. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 108th Congress (2003-2005)    

Distribution of Seats

Majority-Minority Conference Seat Margin  

Total

Majority (R)

Minority (D)

Indp.

 

Total Senators

100

51

48

1

2

Total Committee Seats

372

195

173

4

18

Committees

Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

21

11

10

 

1

Appropriations

29

15

14

 

1

Armed Services

25

13

12

 

1

Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

21

11

10

 

1

Budget

23

12

11

 

1

Commerce, Science, and Transportation

23

12

11

 

1

Energy and Natural Resources

23

12

11

 

1

Environment and Public Works

19

10

8

1

1

Finance

21

11

9

1

1

Foreign Relations

19

10

9

 

1

Governmental Affairs

17

9

8

 

1

Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

21

11

9

1

1

Indian Affairs

15

8

7

 

1

Judiciary

19

10

9

 

1

Rules and Administration

19

10

9

 

1

Small Business and Entrepreneurship

19

10

9

 

1

Veterans' Affairs

15

8

6

1

1

Select Committee on Ethics

6

3

3

 

0

Select Committee on Intelligence

17

9

8

 

1

Source: The Senate of the United States Committee and Subcommittee Assignments for the One Hundred Eighth Congress, Prepared Under the Direction of Emily J. Reynolds, Secretary of the Senate, by David J. Tinsley, Legislative Clerk, March 31, 2003 (Washington: GPO, 2003), S. Pub. 108-5.

Note: Senator James M. Jeffords, an Independent, caucused with the minority (Democrats).

Table 9. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 107th Congress (2001-2003)    

Distribution of Seats

Majority-Minority Conference Seat Margin  

Total

Majority (D)

Minority (R)

Indp.

 

Total Senators

100

50

49

1

2

Total Committee Seats

372

191

177

4

18

Committees

Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

21

11

10

 

1

Appropriations

29

15

14

 

1

Armed Services

25

13

12

 

1

Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

21

11

10

 

1

Budget

23

12

11

 

1

Commerce, Science, and Transportation

23

12

11

 

1

Energy and Natural Resources

23

12

11

 

1

Environment and Public Works

19

9

9

1

1

Finance

21

10

10

1

1

Foreign Relations

19

10

9

 

1

Governmental Affairs

17

9

8

 

1

Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

21

10

10

1

1

Indian Affairs

15

8

7

 

1

Judiciary

19

10

9

 

1

Rules and Administration

19

10

9

 

1

Small Business and Entrepreneurship

19

10

9

 

1

Veterans' Affairs

15

7

7

1

1

Select Committee on Ethics

6

3

3

 

0

Select Committee on Intelligence

17

9

8

 

1

Source: The Senate of the United States Committee and Subcommittee Assignments for the One Hundred Seventh Congress, Prepared Under the Direction of Jeri Thomson, Secretary of the Senate, by David J. Tinsley, Legislative Clerk, November 29, 2001 (Washington: GPO, 2001), S. Pub. 107-21.

Notes: This table reflects data compiled after the June 2001 end of power sharing. At the beginning of the 107th Congress, the Senate was divided equally between Republicans and Democrats. As a result, Democrats chaired all committees for the first 17 days of the session, and Republicans assumed the committee chairmanships following the inauguration of Vice President Richard Cheney, whose ability to break tie votes made it possible
) are counted in individual and overall committee 1 Senate Democrats and Republicans currently refer to their respective party organizations as “conferences.” The term “caucus” has been used interchangeably. For the purposes of this report, the word “caucus” is used to describe each organization. 2 Committee ratios rarely match exactly the chamber ratio, particularly with regard to small committees. 3 Data are generally taken from the first official list prepared as a Senate publication, excluding lists marked “interim” or “preliminary” which may be incomplete, under the direction of the Secretary of the Senate. There were some anomalies during the period examined in this report. For example, most of the lists were issued in the spring of the first session of each Congress. In the 99th Congress, all the Secretary’s lists were marked preliminary for the entire Congress, however, the first and last versions reflect the same full committee data. The dates of the publications are footnoted at the end of each table. As noted, the 107th Congress is an exception due to the unusual circumstances of the equally divided Senate (see footnote 2). The 94th and 111th Congresses were also exceptions due to contested elections, which resulted in delaying for months the seating of one Senator in each of these Congresses. 4 At the beginning of the 107th Congress, the Senate was divided equally between Republicans and Democrats. As a result, Democrats chaired all committees for the first 17 days of the session, and Republicans assumed the committee chairmanships following the inauguration of Vice President Richard Cheney. An historic power sharing agreement, S.Res. 8, was presented by party leaders and agreed to on January 5, 2001. In June 2001, after one Republican announced his intention to become an Independent, and switch party caucuses, the Republicans were reduced to 49 seats and the Democrats, with 50 seats, gained control of the Senate. A provision of S.Res. 120, agreed to on June 29, 2001, gave the majority a one seat advantage on each Senate committee (except for the Ethics Committee). The resolution further provided that no Senator would lose a committee seat by virtue of the resolution. For more details, see CRS Report RL30881, Senate Organization in the 107th Congress: Agreements Reached in a Closely Divided Senate, by Elizabeth Rybicki. 5 Party division data cited in the Secretary’s committees list may differ with party data immediately following the November elections. 6 The Congressional Directory is published by the U.S. Congress, in partnership with the Government Printing Office, at the direction of the Joint Committee on Printing (Title 44, Section 721 of the U.S. Code). 7 Anomalies and caveats are noted as appropriate in this report or in table footnotes. Congressional Research Service 1 Senate Committee Party Ratios: 94th - 111th Congresses totals for consistency. Use of other versions of these publications, and the use of alternate sources or methodologies, may yield different results. For example, data from other sources or time frames reflecting the number of Senators representing a particular party may change during a Congress, due to the death or resignation of a Senator, or as a consequence of a Senator changing party affiliation, and could lead to alternate findings. A table representing each of the 18 Congresses includes the standing committees and select committees as established and titled in each Congress. Each table reflects the party divisions in the Senate and the total number of seats (1) in the chamber, (2) in committees, (3) on each committee, (4) assigned to the majority and minority parties and to Independents and other party affiliations (where present)8, and (5) majority and minority party seats on each committee. Data are also provided for the majority-minority seat margin in the chamber, on each committee, as well as the total seat margin for all standing committees and select committees. A comparison of the Senate majority caucus seats in the chamber with total committee seats is provided in Table 1. The following statistical information and selected analyses are based on the tables to illustrate trends over time and to highlight variations from traditional practices. Comparative Analysis of Ratios In general, it has been the practice of the Senate to apportion committee seats to the majority and minority parties in a manner that corresponds closely to the party strength in the full chamber. The data for the 94th through the 111th Congresses bear this out, with slight majority overrepresentation in certain instances (with the exception of the Select Committee on Ethics, on which equal party strength is required, and the Select Committee on Intelligence, which by Senate standing order has a one-seat majority advantage) regardless of which party has majority status. Across the 18 Congresses, the widest majority-minority party divisions in the chamber existed in the 94th and 95th Congresses. In both Congresses, the majority (Democrats) had 62 caucus members compared to the 38 members in the minority (Republicans). The Congresses with the three narrowest party divisions in the Senate were the 107th, 108th, and 110th Congresses. In the 107th Congress, an Independent played a pivotal role by caucusing with the majority (Democrats) party which resulted in 51 caucus seats for the majority (Democrats) and 49 for the minority (Republicans).9 In the 110th Congress, one Independent and one Independent-Democrat both caucused with the Democrats and consequently shifted the balance of power in favor of the Democrats, who gained majority control in the chamber with 51 caucus members.10 8 A Conservative-Republican, Senator James L. Buckley (who caucused with the Republicans), was elected to the 94th Congress. Senator Joseph I. Lieberman, formerly a Democrat, was reelected in 2006 as an Independent and is identified as an Independent-Democrat in the 110th Congress. 9 Data referenced for the 107th Congress in this report were compiled after the June 2001 party switch. See footnote 4 for details. 10 In the period examined, members of other party affiliations were elected to the 94th through 97th Congresses, and the 107th through 111th Congresses. Independents have caucused with Democrats, an Independent-Democrat caucused with the Democrats, and a Conservative-Republican caucused with Republicans in the 94th Congress. Congressional Research Service 2 Senate Committee Party Ratios: 94th - 111th Congresses The majority (Democrat) had a substantial chamber numerical advantage in three consecutive Congresses: the 94th, 95th, and 96th Congresses. The 94th Congress witnessed a majority-minority caucus member margin of 24 in favor of the majority (Democrats), who had 62 caucus members. In the 95th Congress, the majority (Democrats) also had 62 caucus members and a caucus margin of 24 seats. In the 96th Congress, the majority (Democrats) had 59 caucus members with a chamber margin of 18 seats. During the first session of the 111th Congress, there were notable changes in the majority and minority party margins, including the party affiliation switch of one Senator from Republican to Democrat11 and the seating of a Democrat12 several months after a contested election was ruled in his favor by a state supreme court. These changes resulted in the majority (Democrats) holding an advantage with 60 caucus seats (58 Democrats and one Independent-Democrat, and one Independent caucusing with the majority) compared to the minority’s 40 seats. The minority gained another seat with the election of a Republican13 in a special election in the second session, thereby increasing the minority to 41 seats resulting in the majority (Democrats) change to 59 caucus members. 110th and 111th Congresses In the closely divided 110th Congress, one Independent-Democrat and one Independent caucused with the majority (Democrats) resulting in adding two seats to the majority’s 49 seats. This resulted in the majority (Democrat) holding 51 caucus seats in the chamber, and an 18 majorityminority caucus member margin in total committee seats. The majority-minority caucus member margin widened in the 111th Congress. As noted above, the majority (Democrats) held 58 seats compared to 40 for the minority (Republicans) with one Independent-Democrat and one Independent who caucused with the majority (Democrats) bringing the majority (Democrats) to 60 caucus members. The majority-minority caucus margin in the chamber was 20, with a caucus margin of 63 in total committee seats. The total number of committee seats increased by 7 seats to 379 seats (from 372 seats in the 110th Congress). Committee Sizes During the period examined, there were 22 standing and select committees with legislative jurisdiction in the 94th Congress, 20 in the 95th Congress, and 19 in the 96th through the 111th Congresses. The size of committees in the Congresses covered by this report ranged from 6 (Ethics) to 30 (Appropriations). In all 18 Congresses, the Appropriations Committee had the distinction of being the largest committee. In the 111th Congress, the Appropriations Committee had a total of 30 seats: 18 majority (Democrats) and 12 minority (Republican) seats. 11 Senator Arlen Specter changed party affiliation from Republican to Democrat on April 30, 2009. 12 Senator Al Franken was elected in the November 2008 election but the election was contested. Following a June 30, 2009, Minnesota State Supreme Court decision, he was sworn into office on July 7, 2009. 13 Senator Scott Brown was elected in a special election on January 19, 2010, and was sworn into office on February 4, 2010. Congressional Research Service 3 Senate Committee Party Ratios: 94th - 111th Congresses The data indicate that the sizes of Senate committees have generally increased since the 94th Congress with a corresponding increase in the number of committee assignments a Senator typically receives. Total committee seats in the 18 Congresses ranged from 291 in the 95th Congress to 379 in the 111th Congress—an increase of 88 seats, or 30.2%. Senate Rule XXV, paragraph 4, generally limits the number of standing committee assignments an individual Senator may have to three. 14 However, Senators currently serve, on average, on four standing committees each. The growth in assignments reflects the interests of Senators in serving on more committees, the need for party leaders to seek waivers of assignment limits to assure working control for the majority on critical committees, and the need to accommodate Senators competing for committee seats.15 Committee Caucus Seat Margins In both the 94th and 95th Congresses, the majority (Democrats) had the widest caucus member margin in the chamber during these 18 Congresses at 24 caucus margin seats. However, the majority-minority caucus margin within committees varied. In the 95th Congress, the majorityminority caucus margins in the committees ranged from one to seven seats (excluding Ethics), with about a third of the 20 standing and select committees having a three or four seat margin; only one committee (Appropriations) had a majority-minority party margin of seven. It would appear that having gained a clear advantage of such a large majority, the party in control did not perceive the need to secure a wide margin on every committee, although the total committee caucus member margin was 72 in the 94th Congress and 65 in the 95th Congress. In the 110th Congress, the majority-minority caucus member margin in the chamber was two (49 Democrats, 49 Republicans, with one Independent-Democrat and one Independent caucusing with the Democrats). The caucus member margin in total committee seats was 18. In each committee (except Ethics) there was a majority-minority caucus member margin of one seat. The same one-seat margin is also evident in each committee (except Ethics) in the 107th Congress in which there were 50 majority Senators (Democrats), 49 (Republicans), and one Independent who caucused with the majority. 16 In both the 105th and 106th Congresses, in which there were 55 majority (Republicans) seats and 45 minority (Democrats) seats, there was a two-seat margin in all committees (except Ethics and Intelligence). In the 101st Congress with the same party division: 55 majority (Democrats) seats and 45 minority (Republicans) seats, the seat margins in committees ranged from one to three seats (except Ethics), which was close to a two-seat average. 14 The standing rules of the Senate are available at http://rules.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?p=RulesOfSenateHome. See CRS Report 98-183, Senate Committees: Categories and Rules for Committee Assignments, by Judy Schneider, for more information on the application of this rule and related processes for assignments. For further information on committee structure and reforms in the Senate and CRS Report RL32112, Reorganization of the Senate: Modern Reform Efforts, by Judy Schneider et al.. 15 Roger H. Davidson, Walter J. Oleszek, and Frances E. Lee, “Committees: Workshops of Congress,” in Congress and Its Members, 12th ed. (Washington, D.C.: CQ Press, 2010), pp. 204-205. 16 Data referenced for the 107th Congress in this report were compiled after the June 2001 party switch. See footnote 4 for details. Congressional Research Service 4 Senate Committee Party Ratios: 94th - 111th Congresses In the 108th Congress, majority party changed from Democrat to Republican from the previous Congress. The caucus margin in both Congresses was 51-49, with a one-seat margin on each committee (except Ethics). Prospects for the Future An examination of committee party ratios in the Senate over the 18 Congresses suggests a pattern: the majority party ratios on committees roughly approximate majority party strength in the Senate chamber, regardless of which party is in control. Each party has experienced changes in political fortunes; each understands that the majority of today could become the minority tomorrow. Including the unusual circumstances of the 107th Congress, majority control of the Senate switched more than six times since the 96th Congress. The absence of any standing rules, or any apparent initiatives to establish formal rules for committee ratios, may indicate that the Senate might continue its long-standing practice of relying on negotiations between majority and minority party leaders. Barring any drastic departure from past practice, determination of majority-minority committee ratios would likely continue to be based on the Senate principles of custom, consultation, and comity. Congressional Research Service 5 Senate Committee Party Ratios: 94th - 111th Congresses Table 1. Comparison of Senate Majority Caucus Members in Chamber and Committees: 94th -111th Congresses Congress Majority Party Senate Chamber Majority Caucus Members Total Majority (Caucus) Committee Seats 111th (2009-2011) Democrat 60.0% 58.3% 110th (2007-2009) Democrat 51.0% 52.4% (2005-2007) Republican 55.0% 55.0% 108th (2003-2005) Republican 51.0% 52.4% 107th (2001-2003) Democrat 51.0% 52.4% 106th (1999-2001) Republican 55.0% 55.2% (1997-1999) Republican 55.0% 55.2% 104th (1995-1997) Republican 53.0% 54.4% 103rd (1993-1995) Democrat 56.0% 55.8% (1991-1993) Democrat 57.0% 56.6% 101st (1989-1991) Democrat 55.0% 55.0% 100th (1987-1989) Democrat 54.0% 54.8% 99th (1985-1987) Republican 53.0% 53.8% (1983-1985) Republican 54.0% 54.7% 97th (1981-1983) Republican 53.0% 54.2% 96th (1979-1981) Democrat 59.0% 58.6% Democrat 62.0% 61.2% Democrat 62.0% 61.8% 109th 105th 102nd 98th 95th (1977-1979) 94th (1975-1977) Source: Figures for this table are from data contained in Table 2 through Table 19; sources for each table are cited. Data in this table include Independents who caucused with the majority party. The last column presents the percentage of total committee seats of the majority caucus compared to the seats held by members of the majority caucus in the chamber. Congressional Research Service 6 Senate Committee Party Ratios: 94th - 111th Congresses Table 2. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 111th Congress (2009-2011) Distribution of Seats Indp Majority-Minority (Caucus) Seat Margin Total Majority (D) Minority (R) IndpDem Senate Party Strength 100 58 40 1 1 20 Total Committee Seats 379 213 158 3 5 63 Committees Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 21 12 9 3 Appropriations 30 18 12 6 Armed Services 26 14 11 Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 23 13 10 Budget 23 12 10 Commerce, Science, and Transportation 25 14 11 Energy and Natural Resources 23 12 10 1 3 Environment and Public Works 19 11 7 1 5 Finance 23 13 10 3 Foreign Relations 19 11 8 3 Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 23 12 10 Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 17 9 7 Indian Affairs 15 9 6 3 Judiciary 19 12 7 5 Rules and Administration 19 11 8 3 Small Business and Entrepreneurship 19 10 8 Veterans= Affairs 15 9 5 Select Committee on Ethics 6 3 3 0 Select Committee on Intelligence 14 8 6 2 1 4 3 1 3 3 1 1 3 3 1 3 1 5 Source: The Senate of the United States Committee and Subcommittee Assignments for the One Hundred Eleventh Congress, Prepared Under the Direction of Nancy Erickson, Secretary of the Senate, by Kathleen Alvarez Tritak, Legislative Clerk, October 19, 2009 (Washington: GPO, 2009), S. Pub. 111-13. (An earlier version dated June 3, 2009 (S. Pub. 111-9) listed 99 Senators while results of the Minnesota November 2008 election was not yet resolved.) Notes: Data in this table reflect the results of a contested election. After the June 30, 2009, Minnesota State Supreme Court ruling, Senator Al Franken was sworn into office on July 7, 2009. Senator Arlen Specter changed his party affiliation from Republican to Democrat on April 30, 2009. Senator Scott Brown was elected to the Senate in the January 19, 2010, special election, and was sworn into office on February 4, 2010. After that election, the party division changed to 57 (Democrats) and 41 (Republicans). Senators who caucused with the majority (Democrats): Senator Joseph Lieberman, an Independent-Democrat, and Senator Bernard Sanders, an Independent. Margins are calculated by adding these Senators’ seats to the majority seats. Congressional Research Service 7 Senate Committee Party Ratios: 94th - 111th Congresses Table 3. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 110th Congress (2007-2009) Distribution of Seats Total Majority (D) Minority (R) IndpDem Indp Majority-Minority (Caucus) Seat Margin Senate Party Strength 100 49 49 1 1 2 Total Committee Seats 372 186 177 4 5 18 Committees Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 21 11 10 1 Appropriations 29 15 14 1 Armed Services 25 12 12 Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 21 11 10 Budget 23 11 11 Commerce, Science, and Transportation 23 12 11 Energy and Natural Resources 23 11 11 Environment and Public Works 19 8 9 Finance 21 11 10 1 Foreign Relations 21 11 10 1 Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 21 10 10 Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 17 8 8 Indian Affairs 15 8 7 1 Judiciary 19 10 9 1 Rules and Administration 19 10 9 1 Small Business and Entrepreneurship 19 9 9 Veterans= Affairs 15 7 7 Select Committee on Ethics 6 3 3 0 Select Committee on Intelligence 15 8 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Source: The Senate of the United States Committee and Subcommittee Assignments for the One Hundred Tenth Congress, Prepared Under the Direction of Nancy Erickson, Secretary of the Senate, by David J. Tinsley, Legislative Clerk, April 2, 2007 (Washington: GPO, 2007), S. Pub. 110-5. Note: Independent Members caucused with the majority (Democrats): Senator Joseph I. Lieberman of Connecticut was reelected in 2006 as an Independent, and became an Independent-Democrat. Senator Bernard Sanders of Vermont was elected as an Independent. Congressional Research Service 8 Senate Committee Party Ratios: 94th - 111th Congresses Table 4. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 109th Congress (2005-2007) Distribution of Seats Total Majority (R) Minority (D) Indp Majority-Minority (Caucus) Seat Margin Senate Party Strength 100 55 44 1 10 Total Committee Seats 353 194 155 4 35 Committees Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 20 11 9 2 Appropriations 28 15 13 2 Armed Services 24 13 11 2 Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 20 11 9 2 Budget 22 12 10 2 Commerce, Science, and Transportation 22 12 10 2 Energy and Natural Resources 22 12 10 2 Environment and Public Works 18 10 7 1 2 Finance 20 11 8 1 2 Foreign Relations 18 10 8 Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 20 11 8 Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 16 9 7 2 Indian Affairs 14 8 6 2 Judiciary 18 10 8 2 Rules and Administration 18 10 8 2 Small Business and Entrepreneurship 18 10 8 2 Veterans= Affairs 14 8 5 Select Committee on Ethics 6 3 3 0 Select Committee on Intelligence 15 8 7 1 2 1 1 2 2 Source: The Senate of the United States Committee and Subcommittee Assignments for the One Hundred Ninth Congress, Prepared Under the Direction of Emily J. Reynolds, Secretary of the Senate, by David J. Tinsley, Legislative Clerk, April 25, 2005 (Washington: GPO, 2005), S. Pub. 109-10. Note: Senator James M. Jeffords, an Independent, caucused with the minority (Democrats). Congressional Research Service 9 Senate Committee Party Ratios: 94th - 111th Congresses Table 5. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 108th Congress (2003-2005 ) Distribution of Seats Total Majority (R) Minority (D) Indp Majority-Minority (Caucus) Seat Margin Senate Party Strength 100 51 48 1 2 Total Committee Seats 372 195 173 4 18 Committees Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 21 11 10 1 Appropriations 29 15 14 1 Armed Services 25 13 12 1 Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 21 11 10 1 Budget 23 12 11 1 Commerce, Science, and Transportation 23 12 11 1 Energy and Natural Resources 23 12 11 1 Environment and Public Works 19 10 8 1 1 Finance 21 11 9 1 1 Foreign Relations 19 10 9 1 Governmental Affairs 17 9 8 1 Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 21 11 9 Indian Affairs 15 8 7 1 Judiciary 19 10 9 1 Rules and Administration 19 10 9 1 Small Business and Entrepreneurship 19 10 9 1 Veterans= Affairs 15 8 6 Select Committee on Ethics 6 3 3 0 Select Committee on Intelligence 17 9 8 1 1 1 1 1 Source: The Senate of the United States Committee and Subcommittee Assignments for the One Hundred Eighth Congress, Prepared Under the Direction of Emily J. Reynolds, Secretary of the Senate, by David J. Tinsley, Legislative Clerk, March 31, 2003 (Washington: GPO, 2003), S. Pub. 108-5. Note: Senator James M. Jeffords, an Independent, caucused with the minority (Democrats). Congressional Research Service 10 Senate Committee Party Ratios: 94th - 111th Congresses Table 6. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 107th Congress (2001-2003) Distribution of Seats Total Majority (D) Minority (R) Indp Majority-Minority (Caucus) Seat Margin Senate Party Strength 100 50 49 1 2 Total Committee Seats 372 191 177 4 18 Committees Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 21 11 10 1 Appropriations 29 15 14 1 Armed Services 25 13 12 1 Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 21 11 10 1 Budget 23 12 11 1 Commerce, Science, and Transportation 23 12 11 1 Energy and Natural Resources 23 12 11 1 Environment and Public Works 19 9 9 1 1 Finance 21 10 10 1 1 Foreign Relations 19 10 9 1 Governmental Affairs 17 9 8 1 Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 21 10 10 Indian Affairs 15 8 7 1 Judiciary 19 10 9 1 Rules and Administration 19 10 9 1 Small Business and Entrepreneurship 19 10 9 1 Veterans= Affairs 15 7 7 Select Committee on Ethics 6 3 3 0 Select Committee on Intelligence 17 9 8 1 1 1 1 1 Source: The Senate of the United States Committee and Subcommittee Assignments for the One Hundred Seventh Congress, Prepared Under the Direction of Jeri Thomson, Secretary of the Senate, by David J. Tinsley, Legislative Clerk, November 29, 2001 (Washington: GPO, 2001), S. Pub. 107-21. Notes: This table reflects data compiled after the June 2001 party control switch. At the beginning of the 107th Congress, the Senate was divided equally between Republicans and Democrats. As a result, Democrats chaired all committees for the first 17 days of the session, and Republicans assumed the committee chairmanships following the inauguration of Vice President Richard Cheney, whose ability to break tie votes made it possible for Republicans to organize the Senate. S.Res. 8, an historic power -sharing agreement was presented by party leaders and agreed to on January 5, 2001. As a result of one Republican announcing his intention to become an Independent and switch party caucuses in May 2001, the Republicans were reduced to 49 seats and the Democrats, with 50 seats, gained control of the Senate in June 2001. A provision of S.Res. 120, agreed to on June 29, 2001, gave the majority a one seat advantage on every committee of the Senate (except for the Ethics). The resolution further provided that no Senator would lose a committee seat by virtue of the resolution. Senator James M. Jeffords changed party affiliation from Republican to Independent and caucused with Democrats effective June 6, 2001. Congressional Research Service 11 Senate Committee Party Ratios: 94th - 111th Congresses Table 7 Table 10. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 106th Congress (1999-2001) Distribution of Seats Total Majority (R) Minority (D) Majority-Minority (Caucus) Seat Margin Senate Party Strength 100 55 45 10 Total Committee Seats 339 187 152 35 Committees Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 18 10 8 2 Appropriations 28 15 13 2 Armed Services 20 11 9 2 Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 20 11 9 2 Budget 22 12 10 2 Commerce, Science, and Transportation 20 11 9 2 Energy and Natural Resources 20 11 9 2 Environment and Public Works 18 10 8 2 Finance 20 11 9 2 Foreign Relations 18 10 8 2 Governmental Affairs 16 9 7 2 Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 18 10 8 2 Indian Affairs 14 8 6 2 Judiciary 18 10 8 2 Rules and Administration 16 9 7 2 Small Business 18 10 8 2 Veterans= Affairs 12 7 5 2 Select Committee on Ethics 6 3 3 0 Select Committee on Intelligence 17 9 8 1 Source: The Senate of the United States Committee and Subcommittee Assignments for the One Hundred Sixth Congress, Prepared Under the Direction of Gary Sisco, Secretary of the Senate by David J. Tinsley, Legislative Clerk, March 29, 1999 (Washington: GPO, 1999), S. Pub. 106-3. Congressional Research Service 12 Senate Committee Party Ratios: 94th - 111th Congresses Table 8. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 105th Congress (1997-1999) Distribution of Seats Total Majority (R) Minority (D) Majority-Minority (Caucus) Seat Margin Senate Party Strength 100 55 45 10 Total Committee Seats 337 186 151 35 Committees Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 18 10 8 2 Appropriations 28 15 13 2 Armed Services 18 10 8 2 Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 18 10 8 2 Budget 22 12 10 2 Commerce, Science, and Transportation 20 11 9 2 Energy and Natural Resources 20 11 9 2 Environment and Public Works 18 10 8 2 Finance 20 11 9 2 Foreign Relations 18 10 8 2 Governmental Affairs 16 9 7 2 Labor and Human Resources 18 10 8 2 Indian Affairs 14 8 6 2 Judiciary 18 10 8 2 Rules and Administration 16 9 7 2 Small Business 18 10 8 2 Veterans= Affairs 12 7 5 2 Select Committee on Ethics 6 3 3 0 Select Committee on Intelligence 19 10 9 1 Source: The Senate of the United States Committee and Subcommittee Assignments for the One Hundred Fifth Congress, Prepared Under the Direction of Gary Sisco, Secretary of the Senate, by R. Scott Bates, Legislative Clerk, February 14, 1997 (Washington: GPO, 1997), S. Pub. 105-6. (An interim list was published dated Jan. 9, 1997, S. Pub. 3.) Congressional Research Service 13 Senate Committee Party Ratios: 94th - 111th Congresses Table 9. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 104th Congress (1995-1997) Distribution of Seats Total Majority (R) Minority (D) Majority-Minority (Caucus) Seat Margin Senate Party Strength 100 53 47 6 Total Committee Seats 331 180 151 29 Committees Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 17 9 8 1 Appropriations 28 15 13 2 Armed Services 21 11 10 1 Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 16 9 7 2 Budget 22 12 10 2 Commerce, Science, and Transportation 19 10 9 1 Energy and Natural Resources 18 10 8 2 Environment and Public Works 16 9 7 2 Finance 20 11 9 2 Foreign Relations 18 10 8 2 Governmental Affairs 15 8 7 1 Labor and Human Resources 16 9 7 2 Indian Affairs 17 9 8 1 Judiciary 18 10 8 2 Rules and Administration 16 9 7 2 Small Business 19 10 9 1 Veterans= Affairs 12 7 5 2 Select Committee on Ethics 6 3 3 0 Select Committee on Intelligence 17 9 8 1 Source: The Senate of the United States Committee and Subcommittee Assignments for the One Hundred Fourth Congress, Prepared Under the Direction of Sheila P. Burke, Secretary of the Senate, by R. Scott Bates, Legislative Clerk, February 27, 1995 (Washington: GPO, 1995), S. Pub. 104-6. (An incomplete interim list was published on January 25, 1995, S. Pub. 104-3.) Note: Data reflect Senator Richard Shelby’s party affiliation change from Democrat to Republican, a few days after the 1994 election, on November 9, 1994. Data do not reflect Senator Ben Nighthorse Campbell’s party affiliation change from Democrat to Republican on March 3, 1995, because it occurred after the February 27, 1995, publication was issued. Congressional Research Service 14 Senate Committee Party Ratios: 94th - 111th Congresses Table 10. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 103rd Congress (1993-1995) Distribution of Seats Total Majority (D) Minority (R) Majority-Minority (Caucus) Seat Margin Senate Party Strength 100 56 44 12 Total Committee Seats 346 193 153 40 Committees Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 18 10 8 2 Appropriations 29 16 13 3 Armed Services 22 12 10 2 Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 19 11 8 3 Budget 21 12 9 3 Commerce, Science, and Transportation 20 11 9 2 Energy and Natural Resources 20 11 9 2 Environment and Public Works 17 10 7 3 Finance 20 11 9 2 Foreign Relations 20 11 9 2 Governmental Affairs 14 8 6 2 Labor and Human Resources 17 10 7 3 Indian Affairs 18 10 8 2 Judiciary 18 10 8 2 Rules and Administration 16 9 7 2 Small Business 22 12 10 2 Veterans= Affairs 12 7 5 2 Select Committee on Ethics 6 3 3 0 Select Committee on Intelligence 17 9 8 1 Source: The Senate of the United States Committees and Subcommittees Assignments for the One Hundred Third Congress, Prepared Under the Direction of Walter J. Stewart, Secretary of the Senate, by R. Scott Bates, Legislative Clerk, Nov. 22, 1993 (Washington: GPO, 1993), S. Pub. 103-10. Prior to this list, there were three interim committee lists: S. Pub. 103-1 (February 19, 1993), S. Pub. 103-3 (March 24, 1992), and S. Pub. 103-7 (July 20, 1993). Note106th Congress (1999-2001)    

Distribution of Seats

Majority-Minority Conference Seat Margin  

Total

Majority (R)

Minority (D)

 

Total Senators

100

55

45

10

Total Committee Seats

339

187

152

35

Committees

Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

18

10

8

2

Appropriations

28

15

13

2

Armed Services

20

11

9

2

Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

20

11

9

2

Budget

22

12

10

2

Commerce, Science, and Transportation

20

11

9

2

Energy and Natural Resources

20

11

9

2

Environment and Public Works

18

10

8

2

Finance

20

11

9

2

Foreign Relations

18

10

8

2

Governmental Affairs

16

9

7

2

Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

18

10

8

2

Indian Affairs

14

8

6

2

Judiciary

18

10

8

2

Rules and Administration

16

9

7

2

Small Business

18

10

8

2

Veterans' Affairs

12

7

5

2

Select Committee on Ethics

6

3

3

0

Select Committee on Intelligence

17

9

8

1

Source: The Senate of the United States Committee and Subcommittee Assignments for the One Hundred Sixth Congress, Prepared Under the Direction of Gary Sisco, Secretary of the Senate, by David J. Tinsley, Legislative Clerk, March 29, 1999 (Washington: GPO, 1999), S. Pub. 106-3.

Table 11. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 105th Congress (1997-1999)    

Distribution of Seats

Majority-Minority Conference Seat Margin  

Total

Majority (R)

Minority (D)

 

Total Senators

100

55

45

10

Total Committee Seats

337

186

151

35

Committees

Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

18

10

8

2

Appropriations

28

15

13

2

Armed Services

18

10

8

2

Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

18

10

8

2

Budget

22

12

10

2

Commerce, Science, and Transportation

20

11

9

2

Energy and Natural Resources

20

11

9

2

Environment and Public Works

18

10

8

2

Finance

20

11

9

2

Foreign Relations

18

10

8

2

Governmental Affairs

16

9

7

2

Labor and Human Resources

18

10

8

2

Indian Affairs

14

8

6

2

Judiciary

18

10

8

2

Rules and Administration

16

9

7

2

Small Business

18

10

8

2

Veterans' Affairs

12

7

5

2

Select Committee on Ethics

6

3

3

0

Select Committee on Intelligence

19

10

9

1

Source: The Senate of the United States Committee and Subcommittee Assignments for the One Hundred Fifth Congress, Prepared Under the Direction of Gary Sisco, Secretary of the Senate, by R. Scott Bates, Legislative Clerk, February 14, 1997 (Washington: GPO, 1997), S. Pub. 105-6. (An interim list was published dated Jan. 9, 1997, S. Pub. 3.)

Table 12. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 104th Congress (1995-1997)    

Distribution of Seats

Majority-Minority Conference Seat Margin  

Total

Majority (R)

Minority (D)

 

Total Senators

100

53

47

6

Total Committee Seats

331

180

151

29

Committees

Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

17

9

8

1

Appropriations

28

15

13

2

Armed Services

21

11

10

1

Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

16

9

7

2

Budget

22

12

10

2

Commerce, Science, and Transportation

19

10

9

1

Energy and Natural Resources

18

10

8

2

Environment and Public Works

16

9

7

2

Finance

20

11

9

2

Foreign Relations

18

10

8

2

Governmental Affairs

15

8

7

1

Labor and Human Resources

16

9

7

2

Indian Affairs

17

9

8

1

Judiciary

18

10

8

2

Rules and Administration

16

9

7

2

Small Business

19

10

9

1

Veterans' Affairs

12

7

5

2

Select Committee on Ethics

6

3

3

0

Select Committee on Intelligence

17

9

8

1

Source: The Senate of the United States Committee and Subcommittee Assignments for the One Hundred Fourth Congress, Prepared Under the Direction of Sheila P. Burke, Secretary of the Senate, by R. Scott Bates, Legislative Clerk, February 27, 1995 (Washington: GPO, 1995), S. Pub. 104-6. (An incomplete interim list was published on January 25, 1995, S. Pub. 104-3.)

Note: Data reflect Senator Richard Shelby's party affiliation change from Democrat to Republican, a few days after the 1994 election, on November 9, 1994. Data do not reflect Senator Ben Nighthorse Campbell's party affiliation change from Democrat to Republican on March 3, 1995, because it occurred after the February 27, 1995, publication was issued.

Table 13. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 103rd Congress (1993-1995)    

Distribution of Seats

Majority-Minority Conference Seat Margin  

Total

Majority (D)

Minority (R)

 

Total Senators

100

56

44

12

Total Committee Seats

346

193

153

40

Committees

Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

18

10

8

2

Appropriations

29

16

13

3

Armed Services

22

12

10

2

Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

19

11

8

3

Budget

21

12

9

3

Commerce, Science, and Transportation

20

11

9

2

Energy and Natural Resources

20

11

9

2

Environment and Public Works

17

10

7

3

Finance

20

11

9

2

Foreign Relations

20

11

9

2

Governmental Affairs

14

8

6

2

Labor and Human Resources

17

10

7

3

Indian Affairs

18

10

8

2

Judiciary

18

10

8

2

Rules and Administration

16

9

7

2

Small Business

22

12

10

2

Veterans' Affairs

12

7

5

2

Select Committee on Ethics

6

3

3

0

Select Committee on Intelligence

17

9

8

1

Source: The Senate of the United States Committees and Subcommittees Assignments for the One Hundred Third Congress, Prepared Under the Direction of Walter J. Stewart, Secretary of the Senate, by R. Scott Bates, Legislative Clerk, Nov. 22, 1993 (Washington: GPO, 1993), S. Pub. 103-10. (Prior to this list, there were three interim committee lists: S. Pub. 103-1 (February 19, 1993), S. Pub. 103-3 (March 24, 1993), and S. Pub. 103-7 (July 20, 1993).)

Note
: In 1984, the Select Committee on Indian Affairs became a permanent committee (S.Res. 127). Later, in 1993, the Select Committee on Indian Affairs was redesignated as the Committee on Indian Affairs (S.Res. 71). Table 14). Congressional Research Service 15 Senate Committee Party Ratios: 94th - 111th Congresses Table 11. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 102nd Congress (1991-1993) Distribution of Seats Total Majority (D) Minority (R) Majority-Minority (Caucus) Seat Margin Senate Party Strength 100 57 43 14 Total Committee Seats 332 188 144 44 Committees Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 18 10 8 2 Appropriations 29 16 13 3 Armed Services 20 11 9 2 Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 21 12 9 3 Budget 21 12 9 3 Commerce, Science, and Transportation 20 11 9 2 Energy and Natural Resources 20 11 9 2 Environment and Public Works 17 10 7 3 Finance 19 11 8 3 Foreign Relations 19 11 8 3 Governmental Affairs 13 8 5 3 Labor and Human Resources 17 10 7 3 Judiciary 14 8 6 2 Rules and Administration 16 9 7 2 Small Business 19 11 8 3 Veterans= Affairs 12 7 5 2 Select Committee on Ethics 6 3 3 0 Select Committee on Indian Affairs 16 9 7 2 Select Committee on Intelligence 15 8 7 1 Source: List of Standing Committees and Subcommittees and Select and Special Committees and Committee Assignments and list of Senators by State of the Senate of the United States Together with Certain Joint Committees of the 102nd Congress (1991-1993)    

Distribution of Seats

Majority-Minority Conference Seat Margin  

Total

Majority (D)

Minority (R)

 

Total Senators

100

57

43

14

Total Committee Seats

332

188

144

44

Committees

Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

18

10

8

2

Appropriations

29

16

13

3

Armed Services

20

11

9

2

Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

21

12

9

3

Budget

21

12

9

3

Commerce, Science, and Transportation

20

11

9

2

Energy and Natural Resources

20

11

9

2

Environment and Public Works

17

10

7

3

Finance

19

11

8

3

Foreign Relations

19

11

8

3

Governmental Affairs

13

8

5

3

Labor and Human Resources

17

10

7

3

Judiciary

14

8

6

2

Rules and Administration

16

9

7

2

Small Business

19

11

8

3

Veterans' Affairs

12

7

5

2

Select Committee on Ethics

6

3

3

0

Select Committee on Indian Affairs

16

9

7

2

Select Committee on Intelligence

15

8

7

1

Source: List of Standing Committees and Subcommittees and Select and Special Committees and Committee Assignments and list of Senators by State of the Senate of the United States Together with Certain Joint Committees of the
Congress for the One Hundred Second Congress, Prepared Under the Direction of Walter J. Stewart, Secretary of the Senate, by Barry J. Wolk, Director of Senate Printing Services, Sept. 23, 1991 (Washington: GPO, 1991), S. Pub. 102-9. (Two interim lists were issued: S. Pub. 102-3 (March 25, 1991) and S. Pub. 102-7 (June 21, 1991). Congressional Research Service 16 Senate Committee Party Ratios: 94th - 111th Congresses Table 12) Table 15. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 101st Congress (1989-1991) Distribution of Seats Total Majority (D) Minority (R) Majority-Minority (Caucus) Seat Margin Senate Party Strength 100 55 45 10 Total Committee Seats 327 180 147 33 Committees Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 19 10 9 1 Appropriations 29 16 13 3 Armed Services 20 11 9 2 Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 21 12 9 3 Budget 23 13 10 3 Commerce, Science, and Transportation 20 11 9 2 Energy and Natural Resources 19 10 9 1 Environment and Public Works 16 9 7 2 Finance 20 11 9 2 Foreign Relations 19 10 9 1 Governmental Affairs 14 8 6 2 Labor and Human Resources 16 9 7 2 Judiciary 14 8 6 2 Rules and Administration 16 9 7 2 Small Business 19 10 9 1 Veterans= Affairs 11 6 5 1 Select Committee on Ethics 6 3 3 0 Select Committee on Indian Affairs 10 6 4 2 Select Committee on Intelligence 15 8 7 1 Source: List of Standing Committees and Subcommittees and Subcommittees and Select and Special Committees and Committee Assignments and List of Senators by State of the Senate of the United States Together with Certain Joint 101st Congress (1989-1991)    

Distribution of Seats

Majority-Minority Conference Seat Margin  

Total

Majority (D)

Minority (R)

 

Total Senators

100

55

45

10

Total Committee Seats

327

180

147

33

Committees

Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

19

10

9

1

Appropriations

29

16

13

3

Armed Services

20

11

9

2

Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

21

12

9

3

Budget

23

13

10

3

Commerce, Science, and Transportation

20

11

9

2

Energy and Natural Resources

19

10

9

1

Environment and Public Works

16

9

7

2

Finance

20

11

9

2

Foreign Relations

19

10

9

1

Governmental Affairs

14

8

6

2

Labor and Human Resources

16

9

7

2

Judiciary

14

8

6

2

Rules and Administration

16

9

7

2

Small Business

19

10

9

1

Veterans' Affairs

11

6

5

1

Select Committee on Ethics

6

3

3

0

Select Committee on Indian Affairs

10

6

4

2

Select Committee on Intelligence

15

8

7

1

Source: List of Standing Committees and Subcommittees and Subcommittees and Select and Special Committees and Committee Assignments and List of Senators by State of the Senate of the United States Together with Certain Joint
Committees of the One Hundred First Congress, Prepared Under the Direction of Walter J. Stewart, Secretary of the Senate, by Barry J. Wolk, Director of Senate Printing Services, May 19, 1989 (Washington: GPO, 1989), S. Pub. 101-1. (An interim list was issued, S. Pub. 101-1 (March 15, 1989).) Table 16.) Congressional Research Service 17 Senate Committee Party Ratios: 94th - 111th Congresses Table 13. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 100th Congress (1987-1989) Distribution of Seats Total Majority(D) Minority (R) Majority-Minority (Caucus) Seat Margin Senate Party Strength 100 54 46 8 Total Committee Seats 325 178 147 31 Committees Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 19 10 9 1 Appropriations 29 16 13 3 Armed Services 20 11 9 2 Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 20 11 9 2 Budget 24 13 11 2 Commerce, Science, and Transportation 20 11 9 2 Energy and Natural Resources 19 10 9 1 Environment and Public Works 16 9 7 2 Finance 20 11 9 2 Foreign Relations 19 10 9 1 Governmental Affairs 14 8 6 2 Labor and Human Resources 16 9 7 2 Judiciary 14 8 6 2 Rules and Administration 16 9 7 2 Small Business 19 10 9 1 Veterans= Affairs 11 6 5 1 Select Committee on Ethics 6 3 3 0 Special Committee on Indian Affairs 8 5 3 2 Select Committee on Intelligence 15 8 7 1 Source: List of Standing Committees and Subcommittees and Subcommittees and Select and Special Committees and 100th Congress (1987-1989)    

Distribution of Seats

Majority-Minority Conference Seat Margin  

Total

Majority(D)

Minority (R)

 

Total Senators

100

54

46

8

Total Committee Seats

325

178

147

31

Committees

Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

19

10

9

1

Appropriations

29

16

13

3

Armed Services

20

11

9

2

Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

20

11

9

2

Budget

24

13

11

2

Commerce, Science, and Transportation

20

11

9

2

Energy and Natural Resources

19

10

9

1

Environment and Public Works

16

9

7

2

Finance

20

11

9

2

Foreign Relations

19

10

9

1

Governmental Affairs

14

8

6

2

Labor and Human Resources

16

9

7

2

Judiciary

14

8

6

2

Rules and Administration

16

9

7

2

Small Business

19

10

9

1

Veterans' Affairs

11

6

5

1

Select Committee on Ethics

6

3

3

0

Select Committee on Indian Affairs

8

5

3

2

Select Committee on Intelligence

15

8

7

1

Source: List of Standing Committees and Subcommittees and Subcommittees and Select and Special Committees and
Committee Assignments and List of Senators by State of the Senate of the UnitedUnited States Together with Certain Joint Committees of the One Hundredth Congress, Prepared Under the Direction of Walter J. Stewart, Secretary of the Senate, by Barry J. Wolk, Director of Senate Printing Services, July 1, 1987 (Washington: GPO, 1987), S. Pub. 100-1. Congressional Research Service 18 Senate Committee Party Ratios: 94th - 111th Congresses Table 14 100-1. Table 17. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 99th Congress (1985-1987) Distribution of Seats Total Majority (R) Minority (D) Majority-Minority (Caucus) Seat Margin Senate Party Strength 100 53 47 6 Total Committee Seats 312 168 144 24 Committees Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 17 9 8 1 Appropriations 29 15 14 1 Armed Services 19 10 9 1 Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 15 8 7 1 Budget 22 12 10 2 Commerce, Science, and Transportation 17 9 8 1 Energy and Natural Resources 18 10 8 2 Environment and Public Works 15 8 7 1 Finance 20 11 9 2 Foreign Relations 17 9 8 1 Governmental Affairs 13 7 6 1 Labor and Human Resources 16 9 7 2 Judiciary 18 10 8 2 Rules and Administration 15 8 7 1 Small Business 19 10 9 1 Veterans= Affairs 12 7 5 2 Select Committee on Ethics 6 3 3 0 Select Committee on Indian Affairs 9 5 4 1 Select Committee on Intelligence 15 8 7 1 Source: List of Standing Committees and Select and Special Committees and Committee Assignments and List of Senators by State of the Senate of the United States Together with Certain Joint Committees of the Congress for the 99th Congress (1985-1987)    

Distribution of Seats

Majority-Minority Conference Seat Margin  

Total

Majority (R)

Minority (D)

 

Total Senators

100

53

47

6

Total Committee Seats

312

168

144

24

Committees

Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

17

9

8

1

Appropriations

29

15

14

1

Armed Services

19

10

9

1

Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

15

8

7

1

Budget

22

12

10

2

Commerce, Science, and Transportation

17

9

8

1

Energy and Natural Resources

18

10

8

2

Environment and Public Works

15

8

7

1

Finance

20

11

9

2

Foreign Relations

17

9

8

1

Governmental Affairs

13

7

6

1

Labor and Human Resources

16

9

7

2

Judiciary

18

10

8

2

Rules and Administration

15

8

7

1

Small Business

19

10

9

1

Veterans' Affairs

12

7

5

2

Select Committee on Ethics

6

3

3

0

Select Committee on Indian Affairs

9

5

4

1

Select Committee on Intelligence

15

8

7

1

Source: List of Standing Committees and Select and Special Committees and Committee Assignments and List of Senators by State of the Senate of the United States Together with Certain Joint Committees of the Congress for the
Ninety-Ninth Congress (Preliminary), Prepared Under the Direction of Jo-Anne L. Coe, Secretary of the Senate, by Barry J. Wolk, Director of Senate Printing Services, April 1, 1985, (Washington: GPO, 1985), S. Pub. 99-2. (All the Secretary of the Senate committee lists in this Congress were marked preliminary. Later preliminary versions were S. Pub. 99-6 (May 1, 1985), S. Pub. 99-9 (October 1, 1985), and S. Pub. 99-15 (August 1, 1986). Congressional Research Service 19 Senate Committee Party Ratios: 94th - 111th Congresses Table 15) Table 18. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 98th Congress (1983-1985) Distribution of Seats Total Majority (R) Minority (D) Majority-Minority (Caucus) Seat Margin Senate Party Strength 100 54 46 8 Total Committee Seats 320 175 145 30 Committees Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 18 10 8 2 Appropriations 29 15 14 1 Armed Services 18 10 8 2 Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 18 10 8 2 Budget 22 12 10 2 Commerce, Science, and Transportation 17 9 8 1 Energy and Natural Resources 20 11 9 2 Environment and Public Works 16 9 7 2 Finance 20 11 9 2 Foreign Relations 17 9 8 1 Governmental Affairs 18 10 8 2 Judiciary 18 10 8 2 Labor and Human Resources 18 10 8 2 Rules and Administration 12 7 5 2 Small Business 19 10 9 1 Veterans= Affairs 12 7 5 2 Select Committee on Ethics 6 3 3 0 Select Committee on Indian Affairs 7 4 3 1 Select Committee on Intelligence 15 8 7 1 Source: 98th Congress (1983-1985)    

Distribution of Seats

Majority-Minority Conference Seat Margin  

Total

Majority (R)

Minority (D)

 

Total Senators

100

54

46

8

Total Committee Seats

320

175

145

30

Committees

Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

18

10

8

2

Appropriations

29

15

14

1

Armed Services

18

10

8

2

Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

18

10

8

2

Budget

22

12

10

2

Commerce, Science, and Transportation

17

9

8

1

Energy and Natural Resources

20

11

9

2

Environment and Public Works

16

9

7

2

Finance

20

11

9

2

Foreign Relations

17

9

8

1

Governmental Affairs

18

10

8

2

Judiciary

18

10

8

2

Labor and Human Resources

18

10

8

2

Rules and Administration

12

7

5

2

Small Business

19

10

9

1

Veterans' Affairs

12

7

5

2

Select Committee on Ethics

6

3

3

0

Select Committee on Indian Affairs

7

4

3

1

Select Committee on Intelligence

15

8

7

1

Source:
Congressional Directory, 98th Cong., 1st, 98th Congress, 1st sess. (Washington: GPO, 1983). Data are based on closing date for compiling DirectoryDirectory material, March 31, 1983. Note Note: In 1984, the Select Committee on Indian Affairs was made a permanent committee of the Senate (S. Res. 127). Congressional Research Service 20 Senate Committee Party Ratios: 94th - 111th Congresses Table 16. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 97th Congress (1981-1983) Distribution of Seats Total Majority (R) Minority (D) Indp Majority-Minority (Caucus) Seat Margin Senate Party Strength 100 53 46 1 6 Total Committee Seats 310 168 140 2 26 Committees Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 17 9 8 1 Appropriations 29 15 14 1 Armed Services 17 9 7 Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 15 8 7 1 Budget 22 12 10 2 Commerce, Science, and Transportation 17 9 8 1 Energy and Natural Resources 20 11 9 2 Environment and Public Works 16 9 7 2 Finance 20 11 8 Foreign Relations 17 9 8 1 Governmental Affairs 17 9 8 1 Judiciary 18 10 8 2 Labor and Human Resources 16 9 7 2 Rules and Administration 12 7 5 2 Small Business 17 9 8 1 Veterans= Affairs 12 7 5 2 Select Committee on Ethics 6 3 3 0 Select Committee on Indian Affairs 7 4 3 1 Select Committee on Intelligence 15 8 7 1 1 1 1 2 Source: Congressional Directory, 97th Congress, 1st sess. (Washington: GPO, 1981). Data are based on closing date for compiling Directory material April 1,1981 Notes: Senator Harry F. Byrd, Jr., an Independent, caucused with the minority (Democrats). In 1981, the Select Committee on Small Business became the Committee on Small Business, a standing committee. Congressional Research Service 21 Senate Committee Party Ratios: 94th - 111th Congresses Table 17. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 96th Congress (1979-1981) Distribution of Seats Total Majority (D) Minority (R) Indp Majority-Minority (Caucus) Seat Margin Senate Party Strength 100 58 41 1 18 Total Committee Seats 292 169 121 2 50 Committees Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 18 10 8 2 Appropriations 28 17 11 6 Armed Services 17 9 7 Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 15 9 6 3 Budget 20 12 8 4 Commerce, Science, and Transportation 17 10 7 3 Energy and Natural Resources 18 11 7 4 Environment and Public Works 14 8 6 2 Finance 20 11 8 Foreign Relations 15 9 6 3 Governmental Affairs 17 9 8 1 Judiciary 17 10 7 3 Labor and Human Resources 15 9 6 3 Rules and Administration 10 6 4 2 Veterans= Affairs 10 6 4 2 Select Committee on Ethics 6 3 3 0 Select Committee on Indian Affairs 5 3 2 1 Select Committee on Intelligence 13 7 6 1 Select Committee on Small Business 17 10 7 3 1 1 3 4 Source: Congressional Directory, 96th Congress, 1st sess. (Washington: GPO, 1979). Data are based on closing date for compiling Directory material March 23, 1979. Note: Senator Harry F. Byrd, Jr., an Independent, caucused with the majority (Democrats). Congressional Research Service 22 Senate Committee Party Ratios: 94th - 111th Congresses Table 18. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 95th Congress (1977-1979) Distribution of Seats Total Majority (D) Senate Party Strength 100 61 Total Committee Seats 291 176 Indp Majority-Minority (Caucus) Seat Margin 38 1 24 113 2 65 Minority (R) Committees Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 18 11 7 4 Appropriations 25 16 9 7 Armed Services 18 10 7 Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 15 9 6 3 Budget 16 10 6 4 Commerce, Science, and Transportation 18 11 7 4 Energy and Natural Resources 18 11 7 4 Environment and Public Works 15 9 6 3 Finance 18 10 7 Foreign Relations 16 10 6 4 Governmental Affairs 17 10 7 3 Human Resources 15 9 6 3 Judiciary 17 11 6 5 Rules and Administration 9 6 3 3 Veterans= Affairs 9 6 3 3 Select Committee on Indian Affairs 5 3 2 1 Select Committee on Nutrition and Human Needs 8 5 3 2 Select Committee on Small Business 9 6 3 3 Select Committee on Ethics 6 3 3 0 Select Committee on Intelligence 19 10 9 1 1 1 4 4 Source: Congressional Directory, 95th Congress, 1st sess. (Washington: GPO, 1977). Data are based on closing date for compiling Directory material March 25, 1977. Note: Senator Harry F. Byrd, Jr., an Independent, caucused with the majority (Democrats). Congressional Research Service 23 Senate Committee Party Ratios: 94th - 111th Congresses Table 19. Senate Committee Party Ratios: 94th Congress (1975-1977) Distribution of Seats Total ConsrvRep Majority (D) Minority (R) Indp Majority-Minority (Caucus) Seat Margin Senate Party Strength 100 61 37 1 1 24 Total Committee Seats 304 186 113 3 2 72 Committees Aeronautical and Space Sciences 10 6 4 2 Agriculture and Forestry 14 9 5 4 Appropriations 26 16 10 6 Armed Services 16 9 6 Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 13 8 5 Budget 16 10 5 1 4 Commerce 20 13 6 1 6 District of Columbia 7 4 3 Finance 18 10 7 Foreign Relations 16 10 6 4 Governmental Operations 14 9 5 4 Interior and Insular Affairs 14 9 5 4 Judiciary 15 9 6 3 Labor and Public Welfare 16 10 6 4 Post Office and Civil Service 9 6 3 3 Public Works 14 9 4 Rules and Administration 9 6 3 3 Veterans= Affairs 9 6 3 3 Select Committee on Nutrition and Human Needs 14 8 6 2 Select Committee on Small Business 17 10 7 3 Select Committee on Standards and Conduct 6 3 3 0 Select Committee To Study Governmental Operations With Respect to Intelligence Activities 11 6 5 1 1 4 3 1 1 1 4 4 Source: Congressional Directory, 94th Congress, 2nd sess. (Washington: GPO, 1975). Data are based on closing date for compiling Directory material by December 19, 1975. New Hampshire Senate 1974 election results were contested. On August 8, 1975, the Senate declared the seat vacant. On the same day, former Senator Norris H. Cotton (Republican) was appointed to fill the seat until a special election was held. After winning a special election on September 16, 1975, Senator John Durkin (Democrat) was sworn into office on September 18, 1975. Data in this table reflect committee ratios of a total of 100 Senators following Senator Durkin’s election. Note: Senator Harry F. Byrd, Jr., an Independent, caucused with the majority (Democrats). Senator James L. Buckley, a Conservative-Republican, caucused with the minority (Republicans). Congressional Research Service 24 Senate Committee Party Ratios: 94th - 111th Congresses Author Contact Information Lorraine H. Tong Analyst in American National Government ltong@crs.loc.gov, 7-5846 Congressional Research Service 25 127).

Author Contact Information

Matthew Eric Glassman, Analyst on the Congress ([email address scrubbed], [phone number scrubbed])
[author name scrubbed], Analyst in American National Government ([email address scrubbed], [phone number scrubbed])

Acknowledgments

Lorraine Tong was the original author of this report. The listed authors have updated the report and are available to respond to questions related to House/Senate Committee party ratios.

Footnotes

1.

Committee sizes appear in Senate Rule 25, but party leaders regularly negotiate other committee sizes as well as party ratios.

2.

Data are generally taken from the first official list prepared as a Senate publication, excluding lists marked "interim" or "preliminary," which may be incomplete, under the direction of the Secretary of the Senate. There were some anomalies during the period examined in this report. For example, most of the lists were issued in the spring of the first session of each Congress. In the 99th Congress, all the Secretary's lists were marked preliminary for the entire Congress. The dates of the publications are footnoted for each table. As will be noted, the 107th Congress was an exception due to the unusual circumstances of the equally divided Senate (see footnote 3). The 111th Congress was also an exception due to a contested election, which resulted in delaying for months the seating of one Senator.

3.

At the beginning of the 107th Congress, the Senate was divided equally between Republicans and Democrats. As a result, Democrats chaired all committees for the first 17 days of the session, and Republicans assumed the committee chairmanships following the inauguration of Vice President Richard Cheney. A power-sharing agreement, S.Res. 8, was presented by party leaders and agreed to on January 5, 2001. In June 2001, after one Republican announced his intention to become an Independent, and switch party caucuses, the Republicans were reduced to 49 seats and the Democrats, with 50 seats, gained control of the Senate. A provision of S.Res. 120, agreed to on June 29, 2001, gave the majority a one seat advantage on each Senate committee (except for the Ethics Committee). The resolution further provided that no Senator would lose a committee seat by virtue of the resolution. For more details, see CRS Report RL30881, Senate Organization in the 107th Congress: Agreements Reached in a Closely Divided Senate, by [author name scrubbed].

4.

Party division data cited in the Secretary's committees list may differ with party data published immediately following the November elections.

5.

Anomalies and caveats are appropriately noted in table footnotes. Use of other versions of the primary documents, and the use of alternate sources or methodologies, may yield different results. For example, data from other sources or time frames reflecting the number of Senators representing a particular party may change during a Congress, due to the death or resignation of a Senator, or as a consequence of a Senator changing party affiliation, and could yield another result.