< Back to Current Version

The Corporation for Public Broadcasting: Federal Funding and Issues

Changes from October 26, 2010 to September 1, 2011

This page shows textual changes in the document between the two versions indicated in the dates above. Textual matter removed in the later version is indicated with red strikethrough and textual matter added in the later version is indicated with blue.


. The Corporation for Public Broadcasting: Federal Funding and Issues Glenn J. McLoughlin Section Research Manager Mark Gurevitz Information Research Specialist October 26, 2010September 1, 2011 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RS22168 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress c11173008 . The Corporation for Public Broadcasting: Federal Funding and Issues Summary The Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) receives virtually all of its funding through federal appropriations; overall, about 15% of all public television and radio broadcasting funding comes from the federal appropriations that CPB distributes. CPB’s appropriation is allocated through a distribution formula established in its authorizing legislation and has historically received two-year advanced appropriations. For FY2011, the CPB appropriation is $430 million, and for FY2012 it will be $445 million (passed as a part of the FY2009 and FY2010 appropriation bills, respectively). The Obama Administration has requested $460 million for the F2011 appropriations request (but which would go into effect in FY2013). On Wednesday, October 20, 2010, Juan Williams, a reporter for National Public Radio (NPR), was fired for comments he made on the Fox News Channel regarding Muslims. Since that incident, some have questioned the process and fairness of this firing, which in turn has raised questions about any federal funding that supports NPR policies and programs. Beyond that issue, this report addresses the components of federal support for public broadcasting, as well as briefly describing those issues facing public television and public radio. This report will be updated as events warrant. Congressional Research Service . The Corporation for Public Broadcasting: Federal Funding and Issues Contents Background ................................................................................................................................1 Corporation for Public Broadcasting ...........................................................................................1 Public Television: PBS................................................................................................................2 Public Radio: NPR and PRI ........................................................................................................2 Federal Funding ..........................................................................................................................3 Issues..........................................................................................................................................6 Tables Table 1. CPB Federal Appropriations ..........................................................................................4 Contacts Author Contact Information ........................................................................................................7Congressional policymakers are increasingly interested in the federal role in supporting CPB due to concerns over the federal debt, the role of the federal government funding for public radio and television, and whether public broadcasting provides a balanced and nuanced approach to covering news of national interest. It is also important to note that many congressional policymakers defend the federal role of funding public broadcasting. They contend that it provides news and information to large segments of the population that seek to understand complex policy issues in depth, and in particular for children’s television broadcasting, has a significant and positive impact on early learning and education for children. On April 15, 2011, President Obama signed the eighth and final Continuing Resolution (CR) into law (H.R. 1473, P.L. 112-10). The final CR sustained $430 million in advanced appropriations for CPB in FY2011, provided $445 million in advanced appropriations for FY2013, and ended $80 million in continued funding from FY2010 for three federal programs related to public broadcasting. On March 15, Representative Lamborn introduced H.R. 1076, To Prohibit Federal Funding of National Public Radio and the Use of Federal Funds to Acquire Radio Content. Among its provisions, the bill would end direct federal funding of NPR Inc. as well as prohibit member stations from using federally appropriated funding to purchase broadcasting content from NPR Inc. The bill, without committee hearings or markup, was considered on the floor of the House of Representatives on March 17, 2011, and passed the same day (228-192). It has been referred to the Senate, where to date no further action has been taken. This report will be updated as events warrant. Congressional Research Service . The Corporation for Public Broadcasting: Federal Funding and Issues Contents Background...................................................................................................................................... 1 Corporation for Public Broadcasting ............................................................................................... 1 Public Television: PBS .................................................................................................................... 2 Public Radio: NPR and PRI............................................................................................................. 2 Federal Funding ............................................................................................................................... 3 Legislative Activity.......................................................................................................................... 6 Issues................................................................................................................................................ 7 Tables Table 1. CPB Federal Appropriations .............................................................................................. 4 Contacts Author Contact Information............................................................................................................. 9 Congressional Research Service . The Corporation for Public Broadcasting: Federal Funding and Issues Background The Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) was incorporated in 1967 as a private nonprofit corporation under the authority of the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967 (P.L. 90-129). CPB funding promotes public television and radio stations and their programs. These CPB-funded stations reach virtually every household in the United States. CPB is the largest single source of funding for public television and radio programming. Most CPB-funded television programs are distributed through the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) created in 1969 by CPB. CPB-funded radio programs are distributed primarily through National Public Radio (NPR), created in 1970 by CPB, and Public Radio International (PRI). The number of radio and television public broadcasting stations supported by CPB increased from 270 in 1969 to 1,050 in 2009,1 of which 356 are television stations. Public broadcasting stations are mostly run by universities, nonprofit community associations, state government agencies, and local school boards. Corporation for Public Broadcasting CPB is a nonprofit private corporation and is guided by a nine-member board of directors. These directors are appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate. The directors serve for staggered six-year terms. The current chairman is Dr. Ernest Wilson III, elected by the board of directors in September 2009. CPB’s principal function is to receive and distribute government contributions (or federal appropriations) to fund national programs and to support qualified public radio and television stations based on legislatively mandated formulas. The bulk of these funds, including the matching funds received from non-federal sources, are used to provide Community Service Grants (or CSGs) to stations that meet specified eligibility criteria. CPB exercises minimum control of program content and other activities of local stations, and is prohibited from owning or operating any of the primary facilities used in broadcasting. In addition, it may not produce, disseminate, or schedule programs. The current president and CEO of CPB is Patricia de Stacy Harrison, appointed by the board of Directorsdirectors in June 2005. Approximately 15% of all public television and radio broadcasting funding comes from the federal appropriations that CPB distributes.2 However, among individual public broadcasting stations, the amount of federal dollars that contributes to a station’s annual budget depends on the funds it receives from non-federal sources; the number and extent of broadcast transmitters required to service its coverage area; the extent to which a station is serving rural areas and minority audiences; and whether or not it is a television or radio station. While federal funding for CPB primarily comes from the Departments of Labor-Health and Human Services - -Education appropriations bill as a separate entry under the “Related Agencies” section of that bill, it may receive other sources of funding from the federal government. For example, on October 15, 2010, CPB and PBS received notification of a Ready to Learn grant of nearly $72 million from the Department of Education’s Office of Innovation and Improvement. 1 2 http://www.cpb.org/aboutpb/faq/stations.html. http://www.cpb.org/stations/reports/revenue/2007PublicBroadcastingRevenue.pdf. Congressional Research Service 1 . The Corporation for Public Broadcasting: Federal Funding and Issues CPB and PBS will use this money to fund research, development, and deployment of transmedia content to improve the math and literarcyliteracy skills of children ages 2-8, especially those living in poverty.3 Public Television: PBS PBS was created by CPB in 1969 to operate and manage a nationwide (now satellite) program distribution system interconnecting all the local public television stations, and to provide a distribution channel for national programs to those public television stations. Although PBS does not produce programs for its members, it aggregates funding for the creation and acquisition of programs by and for the stations, and distributes programs through its satellite distribution system. Paula Kerger became the sixth and current president and CEO of PBS in March 2006. Public Radio: NPR and PRI For radio, a different division of responsibilities was established. CPB created National Public Radio (NPR) in 1970 as a news-gathering, production, and program-distribution company governed by its member public radio stations. Unlike its public television counterpart, NPR is authorized to produce radio programs for its members as well as to provide, acquire, and distribute radio programming through its satellite program distribution system. The NPR FoundationNPR Inc., located in Washington, DC, provides these administrative operations. Public Radio International (PRI) was founded in 1983 as an independent, not-for-profit corporation to act as another distributor of public radio content, in competition with National Public Radio and other existing distributors. Vivian Schiller became the current Joyce Slocum is currently the interim president and CEO of NPR in January 2009. On October 20, 2010, Juan Williams, a reporter for NPR, was fired by NPR President Vivian Schillernews analyst working as an independent contractor reporter for NPR, was fired by executives in the office of NPR News for comments Mr. Williams made on the Fox News Channel., as well as apparently for previous incidents that violated the terms of Mr. Williams’s contract.4 In an appearance on The O’Reilly Factor show, Mr. Williams stated that he gets “nervous” when he sees someone in “Muslim garb” on an airplane. Two days after his appearance, Mr. Williams was notified by telephone that his contract with NPR was being terminated. In a memorandum to NPR staff on October 24, 2010, Ms. Schiller stated that she failed to both properly inform Mr. Williams and NPR staff of the move. However, Ms. Schiller also stated that Mr. Williams’ comment was just Vivian Schiller, then President and chief executive at NPR, stated that she “regrets that NPR executives did not meet with (Mr.) Williams in person to discuss the situation.” In addition, Ms. Schiller also stated that Mr. Williams’s comment was just the most recent in a series of objectionable remarks Mr. Williams has made while offering commentary on Fox News.4 Almost immediately, there was a strong reaction from some among the media and public about the process and fairness of this firing. This in turn has raised questions about any federal funding that supports NPR policies and programs. In response, some policymakers are revisiting the issue of whether federal appropriations should continue to support any part of the public broadcasting system. They are addressing the overall federal appropriations for CPB (discussed below), as well as any direct funding the NPR 3 Corporation for Public Broadcasting, “The Corporation for Public Broadcasting and PBS Receive Ready To Learn Grant Funding from the U.S. Department of Education,” press release, October 15, 2010, http://www.cpb.org/ pressroom/release.php?prn=840. 4 Mark Memmott and David Folkenflik, NPR CEO Apologizes for Handling of Williams’ Termination, NPR, Washington, DC, October 25, 2010, 5 pages, http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2010/10/25/130805049. Congressional Research Service 2 . The Corporation for Public Broadcasting: Federal Funding and Issues Foundation receives from federal sources. In both FY2009 and FY2010, while CPB distributed grant money to over 600 public radio stations, NPR also directly received $8 million designated for “special projects” ($3.9 million in FY2009 and $4.1 million in FY2010).5 In addition, there appears to be at least another source of federal funding for NPR. The NPR Foundation, which oversees the NPR system, states that annually NPR receives direct funding in the range of $1.5 million to $3 million from three federal agencies and CPB, and that this funding accounts for less than 2% of its annual budget. In FY2009 the NPR Foundation received $1.6 million and in FY2010, $2.5 million. The sources of this funding are the National Endowment of the Arts, CPB, the Department of Commerce’s National Telecommunications and Information Administration, and the Department of Education. 6 Federal Funding The Obama Administration requested a $460 million appropriation for CPB in its FY2011 budget request (which would be implemented in FY2013). The vehicle that is used to provide appropriations to the CPB is the Departments of Labor-Health and Human Services-Education bill. For FY2011, S. 3686 has been reported out of the Senate Appropriations Committee (S.Rept. 111-243, July 29, 2010). In this bill, the Senate committee agreed with President Obama’s request for $460 million for FY2013. No further action in either the House or Senate has been taken on this bill to date. On September 30, 2010, Congress passed a Continuing Appropriations bill to extend federal funding for all programs through December 3, 2010. Since CPB has a two-year advanced appropriation, both the FY2011 and FY2012 appropriations for CPB have already been approved (in FY2009 and FY2010, respectively). For FY2011, the CPB will receive $430 million, and for FY2012 it will receive $445 million. From 2001-2008, the Bush Administration had requested that the advanced appropriations for CPB end. Congress did not support this request. The Bush Administration also requested that some funding from CPB’s enacted appropriations be made available for digital conversion grants to public television broadcasters, to which Congress agreed. Since 2009, the Obama Administration has proposed and supported increased funding for CPB through the two-year advanced appropriations. From the last year of available information, the U.S. public broadcasting system – comprised of the national public radio and television stations—reported total income of $2.85 billion in FY2008.7 This decision was supported by the leadership of NPR news.5 However, almost immediately there was a strong reaction from some 3 Corporation for Public Broadcasting, “The Corporation for Public Broadcasting and PBS Receive Ready To Learn Grant Funding from the U.S. Department of Education,” press release, October 15, 2010, http://www.cpb.org/ pressroom/release.php?prn=840. 4 Mike Riksen, Vice President, Policy & Representation, letter to the Congressional Research Service, December 6, 2010. p. 1. 5 Ibid., and as cited at http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2010/10/25/130805049/npr-ceo-apologizes-for-handlingof-williams-termination. Information on NPR’s code of ethics may be viewed at http://www.npt.org/about/aboutnpr/ ethics/. Last viewed December 23, 2010. Congressional Research Service 2 . The Corporation for Public Broadcasting: Federal Funding and Issues among the media and public about the process and fairness of this firing. This in turn has raised questions about any federal funding that supports NPR policies and programs. On January 6, 2011, NPR Inc. announced that its board of directors had accepted several recommendations to provide greater clarity and transparency for its code of ethics regarding NPR employees. These include reviewing and updating of policies and training with respect to the role of NPR journalists appearing on other media outlets, reviewing and defining their roles (including those of news analysts) in a changing news environment, and encouraging a broad range of viewpoints to reflect the diversity of NPR’s national audiences. At the same time these recommendations were announced, Ellen Weiss, vice president of news for NPR, resigned; it was also announced that Ms. Schiller would not receive a bonus for 2010. On March 9, 2011, Vivian Schiller resigned as President and CEO of NPR, over continued scruitny and criticism over NPRs handling of an incident regarding Ronald Schiller (no relation) in a taped interview. In response, some policymakers are revisiting the issue of whether federal appropriations should continue to support any part of the public broadcasting system. They are addressing the overall federal appropriations for CPB (discussed below), as well as any direct funding the NPR Foundation receives from federal sources. H.R. 68 and H.R. 69 (Representative Lamborn, and discussed more fully later in this report) were introduced on January 5, 2010. These bills would eliminate federal appropriations for NPR and CPB, respectively, in FY2013. In addition, the fifth CR for FY2011, passed by the House on February 19, 2011, does not include funding for CPB. In both FY2009 and FY2010, while CPB distributed grant money to over 600 public radio stations, NPR also directly received $4.3 million designated for “special projects” ($1.6 million in FY2009 and $2.7 million in FY2010).6 In addition, there appears to be at least another source of federal funding for NPR. NPR Inc., which oversees the NPR system, states that annually NPR receives direct funding in the range of $1.5 million to $3 million from three federal agencies and CPB, and that this funding accounts for less than 2% of its annual budget. In FY2009 NPR Inc. received $1.6 million and in FY2010, $2.5 million. The sources of this funding are the National Endowment of the Arts, CPB, the Department of Commerce’s National Telecommunications and Information Administration, and the Department of Education.7 Federal Funding The Obama Administration requested a $451 million appropriation for CPB in its FY2012 budget request (which would be implemented in FY2014). The vehicle that is used to provide appropriations to the CPB is the Departments of Labor-Health and Human Services-Education bill. However, because of the delay in approving federal funding for all agencies in FY2011, to date there has not been a bill introduced that would provide appropriations for the Departments of Labor-Health and Human Services-Education for FY2012. For FY2011, S. 3686 was reported out 6 Also described by NPR as “occasional projects.” It is important to note that the original numbers provided to CRS were $3.9 million in FY2009 and $4.1 million in FY2010, for a total of $8 million. Telephone Conversation, Office of Congressional Affairs, Corporation for Public Broadcasting, October 21, 2010. The purpose of these grants were to develop HD radio technology for those who are “print- and hearing-impaired”; to distribute next generation public broadcasting technology to individual stations; to support collaborations between public radio and public broadcasting stations for content related to news events of 2008 and 2009; and for other projects. Mike Riksen, Vice President, Policy & Representation, letter to the Congressional Research Service, December 6, 2010. p. 2. 7 Personal Communication, Anna Christopher, Communications Office, NPR, October 26, 2010. Congressional Research Service 3 . The Corporation for Public Broadcasting: Federal Funding and Issues of the Senate Appropriations Committee (S.Rept. 111-243, July 29, 2010). In this bill, the Senate committee agreed with President Obama’s request for $460 million for FY2013. The subsequent eighth, and final, FY2011 CR of April 15, 2011, maintained CPB’s funding. From the last year of available information, the U.S. public broadcasting system—comprised of the national public radio and television stations—reported total income of $2.85 billion in FY2008.8 According to the CPB, for public broadcasting revenue by source, CPB funds made up 13.8% of the total; another 2.6% came from federal grants and contracts. The remaining 83.6% was raised from non-federal sources (including individuals, businesses, foundations, state and local governments, and educational institutions). The largest single income source (24.6% in FY2008) came from membership. 5 Also described by NPR as “occasional projects.” It appears that these are content and broadcasting projects that will be made for distribution to public radio stations. Telephone Conversation, Office of Congressional Affairs, Corporation for Public Broadcasting, October 21, 2010. 6 Personal Communication, Anna Christopher, Communications Office, NPR, October 26, 2010. 7 http://www.cpb.org/stations/reports/revenue/2008PublicBroadcastingRevenue.pdf Congressional Research Service 3 . The Corporation for Public Broadcasting: Federal Funding and Issues Of the majority of federal Federal appropriations which go through CPB to the individual public radio and television stations; only local public broadcasting stations receive these generally unrestricted federal funds directly. For NPR-affiliated stations and television stations generally are designated as unrestricted federal funds. For those public radio stations which applied for grants, the amount of grants awarded by CPB totaled $62.3 million in FY2009 and $65 million in FY2010. However, member stations also pay NPR fees for content and programming; some contend that federal grant money is supporting part of the revenue streams back to NPR Foundation. For some, the Juan Williams firing highlighted the issue of funding that the NPR receives from federal sources. As stated above, public radio stations which make up the NPR network can apply for CPB grants, and the amount of these grants totaled $62.3 million in FY2009 and $65 million in FY2010. Within these two amounts, $8 million was provided directly to the NPR Foundation for “special projects” ($3.9 million in FY2009 and $4.1 million in FY2010). In addition, between $1.5 million and $3 million has been provided directly to the NPR Foundation on an annual basis ($1.6 million in FY2009 and $2.5 million in FY2010). Some contend that because public radio stations also pay licensing fees to NPR for content and programming, and that many public radio stations are receiving CPB grants, that this may also be an indirect federal revenue stream to NPR back to NPR Inc. A history of CPB appropriations is presented in Table 1. Additional information on both NPR and PBS funding may be obtained at their respective websites ( http://www.npr.org and http://wwwww.pbs.org, respectively). Table 1. CPB Federal Appropriations ($ in millions) Fiscal Year 8 Administration Request House Appropriation Senate Appropriation Final Appropriation 1969 $9 a $6 $5 1970 $15 a $15 $15 1971 $22 a $27 $23 1972 $35 $35 $35 $35 1973 $45 $45 $45 $35 1974 $45 a $55 $50 1975 $60 $60 $65 $62 1976 $70 $78.5 $78.5 $78.5 TQb $17 $17.5 $17.5 $17.5 1977 $70 $96.7 1978 $80 1979 $90 1980 1981 $103 $103 $107.1 $121.1 $119.2 $120.2 $140 $120.2 $120 $145 $172 $152 1981 $162 $162 $162 $162 1982 $172 $172 $172 $172 1983 $172 $172 $172 $137 1984 $110 $110 $130 $137.5http://www.cpb.org/stations/reports/revenue/2008PublicBroadcastingRevenue.pdf. Congressional Research Service 4 . The Corporation for Public Broadcasting: Federal Funding and Issues Fiscal Year Administration Request House Appropriation Senate Appropriation Final Appropriation 1982 $172 $172 $172 $172 1983 $172 $172 $172 $137 1984 $110 $110 $130 $137.5 1985 $85 $130 $130 $150.5 1986 $75 $130 $130 $159.5 1987 $186 a $238 $200 1988 $214 a $214 $214 1989 $214 $214 $238 $228 1990 $214 $238 $248 $229.4c 1991 $214 a $302.5d $298.9d 1992 $242.1 $314.1d $340.5d $327.3d 1993 $306.5d $306.5d $341.9 $318.6d 1994 $260 $253.3 $284 $275 1995 $275 $271.6 $310 $285.6 1996 $292.6 $292.6 1997 $320 $275 $292.6 a $330 $260 1998 $296.4 $240 $260 $250 1999 $275 $250 $250 $250 2000 $325 $300 $300 $300 2001 $340 $340 $340 $340 2002 $350 $340 $350 $350 2003 $365 $365 $365 $362.8 2004 e $365 $395 $377.8 2005 e $380 $395 $386.8f 2006 e, g $335 $400 $396h 2007 e, g $400 $400 $400 2008 e, g $400 $400 $393i 2009 e, g None $400 $400 2010 e, g $420 $420 $420 2011 e $430 $430 $430 2012 $440 $440 $450 $445 2013 $460445j — — $445k 2014 $451j — — — Source: Compiled by the Congressional Research Service from information from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. (http://www.cpb.org). a. Allowance not included in House Bill because of lack of authorizing legislation. Congressional Research Service 5 . The Corporation for Public Broadcasting: Federal Funding and Issues b. Transition Quarter funding, during which federal budget year changed from July to September. c. Reduced FY1990 by Sequestration. d. Includes funds appropriated for the Satellite Replacement Fund. e. From FY2002-FY2011, the Bush Administration declined to request two-year advance funding for CPB. Similarly, the President’s budget request did not provide separate funding for digital or, where applicable, Congressional Research Service 5 . The Corporation for Public Broadcasting: Federal Funding and Issues interconnection replacement, but would have permitted CPB to use a portion of its general appropriation to fund both. f. FY2005 funding ($390 million) reduced by 0.80% across-the-board rescission in P.L. 108-447. g. From FY2006-FY2010, the Bush Administration proposed rescissions to CPB’s already-enacted two-year advanced funding. The proposed rescissions: $10 million from FY2006; $53.5 million from FY2007; $50 million from FY2008; $200 million from FY2009 and $220 million from FY2010. h. FY2006 funding ($400 million) reduced by 1% across-the-board rescission in P.L. 109-148. i. FY2008 funding ($400 million) reduced by 1.747% across-the-board rescission in P.L. 110-161. Issues In an age of multiple cable channel options, digital radio, and computerized digital streaming, some ask whether there is a need for a federally supported national broadcasting system. Supporters of public broadcasting argue that public radio and television broadcasters, free of commercial interruption, provide perhaps the last bastion of balanced and objective information, news, children’s education, and entertainment in an era of a changing media landscape. Others contend that public broadcasting has lost much of its early impact since the media choices have grown so much over the last several decades and that the federal role in public broadcasting should be re-evaluated as well. j. Fiscal Year 2012 Appendix Budget of the U.S. Government. k. P.L. 112-10 Senate Committee on Appropriations FY 2011 CR: Labor, HHS, Education Summary. Legislative Activity Current legislative interest and activity regarding federal funding for CPB dates from the end of the 111th Congress through the first session of the 112th Congress. During the 111th Congress, Representative Lamborn (CO) introduced H.R. 5538, a bill that would eliminate federal funding for CPB after FY2012.9 This bill was referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. During the “lame duck” period of the 111th Congress in November, 2010, Representative Lamborn sought to have his bill considered for floor action in the House, but this action was defeated by a vote of 239-171. In response, Representative Earl Blumenauer (OR) defended public broadcasting by stating that “National Public Radio is one of the few areas where the American public can actually get balanced information.”10 On January 5, 2011, Representative Lamborn introduced H.R. 68 (To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to prohibit Federal funding for the Corporation of Public Broadcasting after FY2013) and H.R. 69 (To prohibit Federal funding of certain public radio programming, to provide for the transfer of certain public debt, and for other purposes). The first bill, like its predecessor H.R. 5538, would eliminate federal appropriations for CPB when its two-year advanced funding ends. The second bill would prohibit federal funding to organizations incorporated for specified purposes related to (1) broadcasting, transmitting, and programming over noncommercial educational radio broadcast stations, networks, and systems; (2) cooperating with foreign broadcasting systems and networks in international radio programming and broadcasting; (3) assisting and supporting such noncommercial educational radio broadcasting pursuant to the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967; or (4) acquiring radio programs from such organizations. In effect, it would prohibit any individual public radio station from using federal funding to engage in transactions with NPR Inc. Both bills have been referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. 9 Full title: “To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to prohibit Federal funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting after fiscal year 2012.” 10 Frances Symes, CQ Today Online News, “House Rejects GOP Bid to Reduce Federal Funding for NPR and Local Stations.” http://www.cq.com/doc/news. Congressional Research Service 6 . The Corporation for Public Broadcasting: Federal Funding and Issues On January 11, NPR Inc. responded to the two bills by stating, in part: “The proposal to prohibit public radio stations from using CPB grants to purchase NPR programming interjects federal authority into local station program decision-making. Furthermore, restrictions on the authority of CPB—a Congressionally chartered, independent, non-profit organization—to make competitive grants to NPR, or any other public broadcasting entity, is misguided.”11 On January 7, Representative Kevin Brady introduced H.R. 235 (Cut Unsustainable and TopHeavy Spending Act of 2011 or the CUTS ACT), which provides that all unobligated balances held by the CPB that consists of federal funds are rescinded and no federal funds appropriated hereafter shall be obligated or expended. On January 24, 2011, Representative Jim Jordan introduced H.R. 408 (Spending Reduction Act of 2011), which would reduce federal spending by $2.5 trillion through FY2021 in part by eliminating the CPB. On January 26, 2011, Senator Rand Paul introduced S. 162 (Cut Federal Spending Act of 2011), which would cut $500 billion in spending in FY2011 in part by defunding the CPB. On March 15, 2011, Representative Lamborn introduced H.R. 1076, a bill to prohibit the funding of National Public Radio and restrict the use of federal funds for member stations to acquire NPR broadcasting content. The House Rules Committee passed H.Res. 174, which permitted H.R. 1076 to go directly to the floor and, without any points of order or amendments, be open to one hour of debate before a full vote in the House of Representatives. H.R. 1076 passed the House 228-192, and was referred to the Senate. No further action has been taken on this bill. Other proposals in the 112th Congress have also addressed federal funding for public broadcasting. On January 20, 2011, the Republican Study Group, a conservative caucus comprised of 100 Members of Congress, released its list of proposed budget cuts, including elimination of CPB’s appropriations starting in FY2012. At the same time, Representative Ryan (WI), the chairman of the House Committee on the Budget for the 112th Congress, has proposed a new continuing resolution that would set the rest of the FY2011 budget at FY2008 (excluding defense, homeland security, and veterans programs). Issues In an age of multiple cable channel options, digital radio, and computerized digital streaming, some ask whether there is a need for federal appropriations to support public broadcasting. The array of commercial all-news radio and radio talk shows, many of which are also streamed on the Internet, provides sources of news and opinion. Supporters of public broadcasting argue that public radio and television broadcasters, free of commercial interruption, provide perhaps the last bastion of balanced and objective information, news, children’s education, and entertainment in an era of a changing media landscape. Still, others contend that public broadcasting has lost much of its early impact since the media choices have grown so much over the last several decades and that the federal role in public broadcasting should be re-evaluated as well. 11 NPR Statement Regarding Proposed Legislation, H.R. 68/69, NPR., Inc., Washington, DC, January 11, 2011. Congressional Research Service 7 . The Corporation for Public Broadcasting: Federal Funding and Issues Supporters of public broadcasting contend that public radio and public television provide education and news to many underserved parts of the American population. Public broadcasters may provide this service to an underserved and less commercially attractive population that commercial broadcasters do not address. For example, PBS broadcasting for children includes lessons in reading, counting, and spelling as part of its content, subjects not normally found on commercial broadcasts. Among the more significant issues facing policymakers may be whether federal funding for public broadcasting should be continued at its current level; whether the funding should be modified or reduced; whether the arrangement between the federal funding process and public broadcasting should be changed; or whether federal funding for public broadcasting should be eliminated. While most federal appropriations go through CPB to support member stations of NPR, PRI, PBS, and a small number of independent affiliates, the handling of the Juan Williams firing from NPR has raised concerns of the federal role in public broadcasting. Since according to NPR, federal funding to supplement administrative functions amounts to less than 2% of its annual budget, some may question whether such a small amount is worthy of congressional action to eliminate. But others contend that the relatively small amount of money that is allocated to NPR functions is proof that NPR can provide operational support without any federal role. Independent of the recent controversy regarding NPR, over the last several years some in Congress have questioned whether the federal appropriations for CPB should be reduced or eliminated as well. Underlying this position are concerns that the federal role, once so clear in 1967, has been eclipsed in a multi-media Internet age; concerns that the size and scope of the federal government budget deficit requires significant cutbacks in many areas; and allegations that public broadcasting is not objective, balanced According to NPR Inc., approximately 90% of public radio stations provide local newscasts, airing both newscast and non-newscast content (primarily in weekday drive times and especially during morning drive-time). Again citing NPR, about half of all public radio stations carry local news during the weekends, and 74% of stations are producing and inserting stories into their programming. Still, several important issues are facing congressional policymakers as they address federal appropriations for all forms of public broadcasting. On the most fundamental level, many question the 1967 law that created the national public broadcasting system and whether the federal government should be in the “business” of providing general appropriations to CPB every year since 1969. They ask: is this still a relevant and appropriate role of the federal government? On a second level, some may contend that in an era of spiraling federal deficits, in which many (if not all) federal expenditures are being re-examined, appropriations for CPB should be reduced if not eliminated. These questions revolve around whether federal funding for public broadcasting should be continued at its current level; whether the funding should be modified or reduced; whether the arrangement between the federal funding process and public broadcasting should be changed; or whether federal funding for public broadcasting should be eliminated. While most federal appropriations go through CPB to directly support member stations of NPR, PRI, PBS, and a small number of independent affiliates, the handling of the Juan Williams firing from NPR has raised concerns of the federal role in public broadcasting. Still, public broadcasting retains its strong supporters. Since according to NPR, federal funding to supplement administrative functions amounts to less than 2% of its annual budget, some may question whether such a small amount is worthy of congressional action to eliminate. Independent of the recent controversy regarding NPR, over the last several years some in Congress have questioned whether the federal appropriations for CPB should be reduced or eliminated as well. Underlying this position are concerns that the federal role, once so clear in 1967, has been eclipsed in a multi-media Internet age; concerns that the size and scope of the federal government budget deficit requires significant cutbacks in many areas; and allegations that public broadcasting is not objective, balanced, or free of an ideological slant. As indicated in Table 1, CPB has consistently received increasing federal appropriations since 1969. Some would contend that this demonstrates a general consensus among congressional Congressional Research Service 6 . The Corporation for Public Broadcasting: Federal Funding and Issues policymakers that there is a federal role in public broadcasting. In addition, public support of public radio and television broadcasting generally has been consistent as well. Whether the firing of Mr. Williams from NPR will substantively or permanently change this support is unclear. The issue of federal support for public broadcasting may be addressed during the “lame duck” session of the 111th Congress, as well as into the 112th Congress.Supporters of a public broadcasting network system contend that local programming content is not determined by NPR Inc., or PBS, and that most content is local serving community needs. Balanced against concerns about the role of the federal government in public broadcasting, as well as strong pressure to reduced federal spending, these issues will likely be addressed at length during the 112th Congress. Congressional Research Service 8 . The Corporation for Public Broadcasting: Federal Funding and Issues Author Contact Information Glenn J. McLoughlin Section Research Manager gmcloughlin@crs.loc.gov, 7-7073 Congressional Research Service Mark Gurevitz Information Research Specialist mgurevitz@crs.loc.gov, 7-7204 79