< Back to Current Version

U.S. Trade Deficit and the Impact of Changing Oil Prices

Changes from September 14, 2010 to January 13, 2011

This page shows textual changes in the document between the two versions indicated in the dates above. Textual matter removed in the later version is indicated with red strikethrough and textual matter added in the later version is indicated with blue.


U.S. Trade Deficit and the Impact of Changing Oil Prices James K. Jackson Specialist in International Trade and Finance September 14, 2010January 13, 2011 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RS22204 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress U.S. Trade Deficit and the Impact of Changing Oil Prices Summary Petroleum prices rose sharply in the first half of 2008, at one time reaching more than $140 per barrel of crude oil. After July 2008, however, petroleum prices and import volumes fell at a historically rapid pace; in January 2009, prices of crude oil fell below $40 per barrel. Since then, crude oil prices have nearly doubled, while the average monthly volume of imports of energyrelated petroleum products has fallen nearly 10% year over year. Despite the drop in the volume of crude oil risen slightly, year over year, reflecting the positive, albeit slow, growth in the rate of economic activity. In addition to the slight rise in the volume of crude oil imports, the rise in the cost of energy imports through 2009 and earlyeleven months of 2010 could add more more than $10080 billion to the nation’s trade deficit in 2010 over that experienced in 2009. Should the U.S. economic recovery falter in the second half of 2010, it could reduce both the volume of energy imports and the price of those imports compared with earlier estimates. This report provides an estimate of the initial impact of the changing oil prices on the nation’s merchandise The increase in energy import prices is pushing up the price of energy to consumers and could spur some elements of the public to pressure the 112th Congress to provide relief to households that are struggling to meet their current expenses. With oil prices rising to over $90 per barrel in early 2011, the International Energy Agency cautioned that the rising price of oil was becoming a threat to the global economic recovery. This report provides an estimate of the initial impact of the changing oil prices on the nation’s merchandise trade deficit. Congressional Research Service U.S. Trade Deficit and the Impact of Changing Oil Prices Contents Background ................................................................................................................................1 Issues for Congress .....................................................................................................................76 Figures Figure 1. Quantity of U.S. Imports of Energy-Related Petroleum Products ..................................3 Figure 2. Value of U.S. Imports of Energy-Related Petroleum Products .......................................4 Figure 3. U.S. Import Price of Crude Oil .....................................................................................6 Tables Table 1. Summary Data of U.S. Imports of Energy-Related Petroleum Products, Including Oil (not seasonally adjusted) ....................................................................................................2 Table 2. U.S. Imports of Energy-Related Petroleum Products, Including Crude Oil (not seasonally adjusted) .................................................................................................................54 Contacts Author Contact Information ........................................................................................................87 Congressional Research Service U.S. Trade Deficit and the Impact of Changing Oil Prices Background According to data published by the Census Bureau of the Department of Commerce, 1 the prices of petroleum products over the first half of 2008 rose sharply, generally rising considerably faster than the change in demand for those products, before falling at a historic rate. After falling each month between August 2008 and February 2009, average petroleum prices reversed course and rose by 85% between February and December 2009, climbing to nearly $80 per barrel at times. Through the first seveneleven months of 2010, petroleum prices reached a peak average price of about $77 per barrel in April before falling to around $72 per barrel in July 2010. Average prices dropped from May to July, one of only three times average monthly petroleum prices have declined since January 2009. Prior to this drop in oil prices, futures contracts had indicated that prices could reach over $80 per barrel by the fall of 2010. As a result of changing petroleum prices, the price changes in January 2009. In November 2010, petroleum import prices averaged nearly $77 per barrel and continued to increase, reaching over $90 per barrel in January 2011. Oil futures contracts indicate, however, that crude oil prices are expected to peak at the $90 range before falling to under $80 per barrel by mid-summer. As a result of changing petroleum prices, the price changes in imported energy-related petroleum products worsened the U.S. trade deficit in 2006, 2007, and 2008, and likely will again in 2010. Energy-related petroleum products is a term used by the U.S. Census Bureau that includes crude oil, petroleum preparations, and liquefied propane and butane gas. Crude oil comprises the largest share by far within this broad category of energy-related imports. In 2009, the slowdown in the rate of growth in the U.S. economy reduced the amount of energy the country imported and helped to push down world energy prices. As economic growth has improved, energy imports have increased and energy prices rosehave risen. In isolation from other events, lower energy prices tend to aid the U.S. economy, which makes it a more attractive destination for foreign investment. Such capital inflows, however, place upward pressure on the dollar against a broad range of other currencies. To the extent that the additions to the merchandise trade deficit are returned to the U.S. economy as payment for additional U.S. exports or to acquire such assets as securities or U.S. businesses, the U.S. trade deficit could be mitigated further. Summary data from the Census Bureau for the change in the volume, or quantity, of energyrelated petroleum imports and the change in the price, or the value, of those imports for 2009 and for 2010 are presented in Table 1. The data indicate that during the first seveneleven months of 2010, the the United States imported about 2.53.9 billion barrels of energy-related petroleum products, valued at $188 at $294 billion. Energy-related imports for this seveneleven-month period were down 2.5up 0.1% in volume terms terms from the same period in 2009 and cost twice as much as26% more than similar imports during the same period in 2009. 1 U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Report FT900, U.S. International Trade in Goods and Services, Table 17, September 9, 2010January 13, 2011. The report and supporting tables are available at http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/ Press-Release/current_press_release/ftdpress.pdf. Congressional Research Service 1 U.S. Trade Deficit and the Impact of Changing Oil Prices Table 1. Summary Data of U.S. Imports of Energy-Related Petroleum Products, Including Oil (not seasonally adjusted) January through JulyNovember 2009 2010 Quantity (thousands of barrels) Value ($ thousands) Quantity (thousands of barrels) % change 2008 to 20092009 to 2010 Value ($ thousands) % change 2008 to 20092009 to 2010 Total energyrelated petroleum products 2,571,251 $127,266,380 2,506,922 -2.5% $188,402,949 48.0% Crude oil 1,976,047 $96,096,639 1,985,853 0.5% $147,420,352 53.43,915,751 $219,999,955 3,918,710 0.1% $294,424,143 33.8% Crude oil 3,035,470 $168,283,047 3,095,124 2.0% $229,640,165 36.5% January through December 2009 2010 (Actual values) (Estimated values) Quantity (thousands of barrels) Value ($ thousands) Quantity (thousands of barrels) % change 2008 to 20092009 to 2010 Value ($ thousands) % change 2008 to 20092009 to 2010 Total energyrelated petroleum products 4,266,007 $245,690,140 4,159,248 -2.5% $363,715,436 48.0269,231 0.1% $328,805,108 33.8% Crude oil 3,314,787 $188,711,775 3,331,236 0.5% $289,499,785 53.4379,930 2.0% $257,517,343 36.5% Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Report FT900, U.S. International Trade in Goods and Services, Table 17, September 9, 2010January 13, 2011. Note: Estimates for January through December 20092010 were developed by CRS from data through July November 2010 and data through 2009 published by the Census Bureau using a straight line extrapolation. The data also indicate that the United States imported 4.3 billion barrels of total energy-related petroleum products in 2009, valued at $246 billion, compared with a total value of $439 billion in 2008. Also, in 2009, the quantity of energy-related petroleum imports fell by 4.0% compared with the comparable period in 2008; crude oil imports also fell by 2.7% from the same period in 2008. Year-over-year, the average value of energy-related petroleum products imports fell by 44% in 2009, while the average value of crude oil imports fell by 45%. As Figure 1 shows, imports of energy-related petroleum products can vary sharply on a monthly basis. In 2009, imports of energy-related petroleum products averaged about 355 million barrels a month. Through the first seven eleven months of 2010, such imports averaged 358356 million barrels a month. Congressional Research Service 2 U.S. Trade Deficit and the Impact of Changing Oil Prices Figure 1. Quantity of U.S. Imports of Energy-Related Petroleum Products $440 Millions of barrels $420 $400 $380 $360 $340 $320 2008 2009 July May June April March January February December October November September July August May June April March January February December October November September July August June May April $300April May June July August September October November December January February March April May June July August September October November December January February March April May June July August September October November $300 2008 2009 2010 Source: Department of Commerce. In value terms, energy-related imports fell from a total value of $439 billion in 2008 to $245 billion in 2009, or a decrease of 44%, to account for about 16% of the value of total U.S. merchandise imports. Energy prices rose sharply in 2007 and continued rising from January through July 2008, not following previous trends of falling during the winter months. As Figure 2 shows, the cost of U.S. imports of energy-related petroleum products rose from about $17 billion per month in early 2007 to $53 billion a month in July 2008, but fell to $13.6 billion a month in February 2009, reflecting a drop in the price and in the volume of imported oil. The average price of imported oil in July November 2010 was up 155.8% from the average price in June November 2009. TotalThe value of total energy imports in JulyNovember 2010 rose slightly from June October 2010 to $28.4 billion,25.2 billion and up from $23.60 billion in November 2009, as indicated in Table 2. Congressional Research Service 3 U.S. Trade Deficit and the Impact of Changing Oil Prices Figure 2.Value of U.S. Imports of Energy-Related Petroleum Products $45 $40 Billions of dollars $35 $30 $25 $20 $15 $10 2008 2009 JulyOctober November September July August May June April March February JanuaryJanuary February December November October AugustNovember September July JuneAugust May June April March January February December October November September July August May June May April $5 2010 Source: Department of Commerce. As a result of the drop in the overall value of energy-related imports in 2009, the trade deficit in energy-related imports amounted to $204 billion, down by nearly half from the $386 billion recorded in 2008, and accounted for 40% of the total U.S. trade deficit of $517 billion for the year. In the seveneleven-month period of January-JulyNovember 2010, the rise in oil prices, year over year, combined with a slight decrease in demand for increase in energy imports, pushed up the overall value of energy imports, which accounted for 4240% of the total merchandise trade deficit. This share is up from the 38% comparable to the share of the trade deficit experienced during the same period in 2009. In July 2010, the November 2010, the share of the U.S. trade deficit arising from energy imports was 3839%, down from the 46%42% share recorded in April 2010 due to a 24% increase in the non-energy portion of the trade deficit. Congressional Research Service 4 U.S. Trade Deficit and the Impact of Changing Oil Prices November 2010. Table 2. U.S. Imports of Energy-Related Petroleum Products, Including Crude Oil (not seasonally adjusted) Total energy-related petroleum productsa Period Quantity (thousands of barrels) Period Value ($ thousands) Crude oil Quantity (thousands of barrels) Thousands of barrels per day (average) Value ($ thousands) Unit price (dollars) 2009 Jan.-Dec. 4,266,007 $245,690,140 3,314,787 9,082 $188,711,775 $56.93 Jan.-July 2,571,251 127,266,380 1,976,047 9,321 96,096,639 48.63Nov. 3,915,751 $219,999,955 3,035,470 9,088 $168,283,047 55.44 January 405,890 16,398,894 301,069 9,712 12,000,941 39.86 February 335,510 13,586,823 254,504 9,089 9,962,489 39.14 March 378,997 16,084,729 291,514 9,404 12,033,939 41.28 Congressional Research Service 4 U.S. Trade Deficit and the Impact of Changing Oil Prices Total energy-related petroleum productsa Crude oil Quantity (thousands of barrels) Value ($ thousands) Quantity (thousands of barrels) Thousands of barrels per day (average) Value ($ thousands) April 366,401 17,354,644 290,973 9,699 13,582,121 46.68 May 337,118 17,682,576 261,296 8,429 13,404,650 51.30 June 371,612 22,515,808 282,057 9,402 16,691,240 59.18 July 375,723 23,642,907 294,634 9,504 18,421,260 62.52 August 339,446 22,459,799 268,878 8,673 17,417,873 64.78 September 361,561 24,845,000 286,200 9,540 19,511,044 68.17 October 328,767 22,416,890 258,420 8,336 17,410,475 67.37 November 314,726 23,011,887 245,925 8,198 17,847,016 72.57 December 350,256 25,690,185 279,317 9,010 20,428,728 73.14 2010 Jan.-July 2,506,922 188,402,949 1,985,853 9,367 147,420,352 74.24Period Unit price (dollars) 2010 Jan.-Nov. 3,918,710 294,424,143 3,095,124 9,267 229,640,165 74.19 January 329,246 24,681,956 245,273 7,912 18,122,185 73.89 February 313,293 23,040,666 243,305 8,689 17,742,303 72.92 March 369,473 27,809,434 299,473 9,660 22,258,328 74.32 April 368,731 28,828,138 294,118 9,804 22,685,592 77.13 May 355,344 27,597,395 280,029 9,033 21,542,988 76.93 June 382,177 28,015,041 311,932 10,398 22,595,686 72.44 July 388,659 28,430,320 311,724 10,056 22,473,270 72.09 August 392,801 29,180,574 306,909 9,900 22,548,205 73.47 September 364,678 26,623,444 289,694 9,656 20,961,556 72.36 October 330,752 24,992,682 254,479 8,209 18,878,078 74.18 November 323,557 25,224,494 258,188 8,606 19,831,974 76.81 Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Report FT900, U.S. International Trade in Goods and Services, Table 17, September 9, 2010January 13, 2011. a. Energy-related petroleum products is a term used by the Census Bureau and includes crude oil, petroleum preparations, and liquefied propane and butane gas. Crude oil comprises the largest share of energy-related petroleum products imports. According to Census Bureau data,2 imports of crude oil fell from an average of 9.8 million barrels of crude oil 2 Report FT900, U.S. International Transactions in Goods and Services, Table 17, September 9, 2010. Congressional Research Service 5 U.S. Trade Deficit and the Impact of Changing Oil Prices imports per day in 2008 to an average of 9.1 million barrels per day in 2009, or a decrease of 7%. In JulyNovember 2010, such imports averaged 10.18.6 million barrels per day, or an increase of 5.6% 0% over the volume of such imports recorded in JulyNovember 2009. From January 2008 to June 2008, the average price of crude oil increased from $84 per barrel to $117 per barrel, or an increase of 39%, as 2 Report FT900, U.S. International Transactions in Goods and Services, Table 17, January 13, 2011. Congressional Research Service 5 U.S. Trade Deficit and the Impact of Changing Oil Prices 39%, as shown in Figure 3. As a result, the value of U.S. crude oil imports rose from about $27 billion a month in January 2008 to $35 billion a month in June 2008. Figure 3. U.S. Import Price of Crude Oil $125 $115 Dollars per barrel $105 $95 $85 $75 $65 $55 $45 2008 2009 July June April May October November September July August May June April March January February December October November December September July August June May April January February March November December October August September May June July September July 2009 August May June April March January 2008 February December October November September July August May June April $35 2010 Source: Department of Commerce. Data for 2009 indicate that a number of factors, primarily the economic recession, had a large impact on pushing down oil prices in the first three months. As economic growth picked up, the higher demand tended to raise pressure on oil prices, which rose through the end of the year. The rise in oil prices and an increase in the volumes of oil imports during the period combined to raise the overall cost of imported energy. At times, crude oil traded for nearly $148 per barrel in July 2008, indicating that the cost of energy imports would have a significant impact on the overall costs of U.S. imports and on the valuesize of the U.S. trade deficit. Since those record prices, the price price per barrel of imported crude oil fell to under $40 per barrel at times in January and February 2009. For the year 2009, the imported volume of energy-related petroleum products fell by 44%, compared with 2008, due in large part to a slowdown in economic activity. At an average price of $56 per barrel in 2009, compared with an average price of $95 per barrel in 2008, energy-related imports fell by nearly $130 billion as a component in the overall U.S. trade deficit. For 2010, the total cost of energy imports could rise to about $300 billion at an average price of $75 per barrel and could rise to nearly $330 billion at an average price of $85 per barrel 76 per barrel and account for nearly half of the annual trade deficit. Congressional Research Service 6 U.S. Trade Deficit and the Impact of Changing Oil Prices Issues for Congress The rise in the prices of energy imports experienced since early 2000 through April 2010January 2011 could have a significant impact on the annual U.S. trade deficit in 2010 and 2011, should those price increases increases stick, or run even higher. The rise in energy prices may well affect the U.S. rate of inflation and could have a slightly negative impact on the rate of economic growth in 2010. Various factors, dominated by the rate of economic growth in the United States and Western Europe, could Congressional Research Service 6 U.S. Trade Deficit and the Impact of Changing Oil Prices Europe, could combine to push up the cost of energy imports, which will have a slightly negative impact on the pace of the economic recovery. Typically, energy import prices have followed a cyclical pattern that has caused energy prices to rise in the summer and decline in the winter. The slowdown in the rate of economic growth in the United States and elsewhere in 2009 sharply reduced the demand for energy imports and caused oil prices to tumble from the heights they reached in July 2008. An important factor that often affects crude oil prices is the impact Atlantic hurricanes have on the production of crude oil in the Gulf of Mexico. The oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico and concerns over the safety of oil wells in the region could somewhat dampen oil production and further strain supplies as summer demand increases. The return to a positive rate of economic growth will continue to place upward pressure on the prices of energy imports and contribute to the nation’s merchandise trade deficit. Some of the impact of this deficit could be offset if some of the dollars that accrue abroad are returned to the U.S. economy through increased purchases of U.S. goods and services or through purchases of such other assets as corporate securities or acquisitions of U.S. businesses. Some of the return in dollars likely will come through sovereign wealth funds, or funds controlled and managed by foreign governments, as foreign exchange reserves boost the dollar holdings of such funds. Such investments likely will add to concerns about the national security implications of foreign acquisitions of U.S. firms, especially by foreign governments, and to concerns about the growing share of outstanding U.S. Treasury securities that are owned by foreigners. It is likely that the economy will again face high and rising prices for imported energy products as national economies recover to a more robust rate of economic growth. It is possible for the economy to adjust to the higher prices of energy imports by improving its energy efficiency, finding alternative sources of energy, or searching out additional supplies of energy. There may well be increased pressure applied to Congress to assist in this process. For Congress, the increase in the nation’s merchandise trade deficit could add to existing inflationary pressures and complicate efforts to stimulate the economy should the rate of economic growth flatten out. In particular, Congress, through its direct role in making economic policy and its oversight role over the Federal Reserve, could face the dilemma of rising inflation, which generally is treated by raising interest rates to tighten credit, and a slow rate of economic growth, which is usually addressed by lowering interest rates to stimulate investment. A sharp rise in the trade deficit may also add to pressures for Congress to examine the causes of the deficit and to address the underlying factors that are generating that deficit. In addition, the rise in prices of energy imports could add to concerns about the nation’s reliance on foreign supplies for energy imports and add impetus to examining the nation’s energy strategy. Congressional Research Service 7 U.S. Trade Deficit and the Impact of Changing Oil Prices Author Contact Information James K. Jackson Specialist in International Trade and Finance jjackson@crs.loc.gov, 7-7751 Congressional Research Service 87