Concurrent Receipt: Background and Issues
for Congress
Charles A. Henning
Specialist in Military Manpower Policy
January 22September 24, 2010
Congressional Research Service
7-5700
www.crs.gov
R40589
CRS Report for Congress
Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress
Concurrent Receipt: Background and Issues for Congress
Summary
“Concurrent Receipt” refers to the simultaneous receipt of two types of monetary benefits:
military retired pay and Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) disability compensation. Prior to
2004, existing laws and regulations dictated that a military retiree could not receive two payments
from federal agencies for the same purpose. As a result, military retirees with physical disabilities
recognized by the Veterans’ Administration would have their retired pay “offset” or reduced
dollar-for-dollar by the amount of their VA compensation.
Proponents for the concurrent receipt of both military retired pay and VA disability compensation
have argued that these pays were for discrete and different purposes: military retired pay is postservice compensation for services rendered while VA compensation recognizes physical or mental
disability incurred while in the service. Opponents have maintained that concurrent receipt is
expensive, not supported by precedent and could result in similar offsets between other federal
programs.
Legislative activity on the issue of concurrent receipt began in the late 1980s and culminated in
the provision for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) in the Bob Stump National
Defense Authorization Act for FY2003 (P.L. 107-314). Successive legislation since then has
extended concurrent receipt to additional eligible populations and further refined and clarified the
program. However, some potential beneficiaries continue to remain excluded from participation.
There are two common criteria that define eligibility for Concurrent Receipt: (1) all recipients
must be military retirees and (2) they must also be eligible for VA disability compensation. There
are two separate and distinct components that are commonly referred to as the Concurrent Receipt
program: (1) Concurrent Retirement and Disability Payments (CRDP) and (2) Combat-Related
Special Compensation (CRSC). A retiree cannot receive both CRSC and CRDP benefits. The
retiree must choose whichever is most financially advantageous to him or her and may move back
and forth between either benefit during an annual “open season”.
This report addresses the two primary components of the concurrent receipt program: CombatRelated Special Compensation (CRSC) and Concurrent Retirement and Disability Payments
(CRDP). It reviews the possible legislative expansion of the program to additional populations
and provide several potential options for Congress to consider.
Concurrent receipt continues to be one of the most misunderstood and controversial military
retirement issues and one that remains the object of intense public and congressional interest.
Congressional Research Service
Concurrent Receipt: Background and Issues for Congress
Contents
Introduction ................................................................................................................................1
Military Retirement and VA Disability Compensation .................................................................2
Military Retirement...............................................................................................................2
VA Disability Compensation .................................................................................................3
Interaction of DOD and VA Disability Benefits .....................................................................3
Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC)..........................................................................4
Original Provisions ...............................................................................................................4
CRSC for Military Disability (Chapter 61) and Active Component TERA Retirees ................5
CRSC for Reserve Retirees ...................................................................................................6
CRSC Eligibility Summary ...................................................................................................6
Concurrent Retirement and Disability Payments (CRDP) ............................................................7
Original Provisions ...............................................................................................................7
CRDP for Those Rated 100% Disabled .................................................................................9
CRDP for Those Rated 100% Disabled Due to Unemployability ...........................................9
CRDP for Temporary Early Retirement Authority (TERA) Retirees..................................... 10
Comparison of CRSC and CRDP .............................................................................................. 10
The “Special Rule” for Disability Retirees................................................................................. 11
Background .................................................................................................................. 11
The “Special Rule” ....................................................................................................... 11
Retroactive Payments................................................................................................................ 12
Major Legislation from the First Session of Congress................................................................ 13
Issues for the Second Session of CongressConcurrent Receipt Legislative Initiatives During the 111th Congress ........................................ 13
First Session ....................................................................................................................... 13
Second Session ................................................................................................................... 14
Issues for Congress ....................................................................................................... 14............ 15
Extend CRDP to Chapter 61 Disability Retirees .................................................................. 1415
Eliminate the CRDP Phase-In or Adjust the Completion Date.............................................. 1415
Extend CRDP to those with a 40% or less VA Disability Rating........................................... 15
Combine CRSC and CRDP into a Single Program............................................................... 1516
Modify or Eliminate the “Special Rule” .............................................................................. 1516
Tables
Table 1. Comparison of CRSC and CRDP ................................................................................. 10
Table 2. Proposed Phase-In of CRDP for Chapter 61 Retirees.................................................... 14
Table B-1. CRDP Phase-in, 2005-2014...................................................................................... 1718
Table B-2. CRDP Compound Phase-In Percentages, 2005-2014 ................................................ 1819
Appendixes
Appendix A. Service Contact Information ................................................................................. 16
17
Congressional Research Service
Concurrent Receipt: Background and Issues for Congress
Appendix B. Operation of the CRDP Phase-In........................................................................... 1718
Appendix C. CRSC Calculations for Disability Retirees ............................................................ 19
Congressional Research Service
Concurrent Receipt: Background and Issues for Congress20
Contacts
Author Contact Information ...................................................................................................... 2122
Congressional Research Service
Concurrent Receipt: Background and Issues for Congress
Introduction
“Concurrent Receipt” refers to the simultaneous receipt of two types of monetary benefits:
military retired pay and Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) disability compensation. With
several separate programs, varying eligibility criteria and several eligibility dates, most observers
find the subject complex and somewhat confusing.1 There are, however, two common criteria:
first, all recipients are military retirees; second, they are also eligible for VA disability
compensation. Beyond the basic eligibility criteria there are two separate and distinct components
that are commonly referred to as making up the Concurrent Receipt program: (1) Concurrent
Retirement and Disability Payments (CRDP) and (2) Combat-Related Special Compensation
(CRSC). As of October 31, 2008, the Department of Defense (DOD) reported 241,182 retirees
receiving CRDP while an additional 66,315 receive CRSC. Both of these programs are discussed
in greater detail below.
Until 2004, the law2 required that military retired pay be reduced dollar-for-dollar by the amount
of any VA disability compensation received. This procedure was generally referred to as an
“offset.” If, for example, a military retiree who received $1,500 a month in retired pay and was
rated by the VA as 70% disabled (and therefore entitled to approximately $1,000 per month in
disability compensation), the offset would operate to pay $500 monthly in retired pay and the
$1,000 in disability compensation. The main advantage for the retiree was that the VA disability
compensation was not taxable.
For many years some military retirees and advocacy groups sought a change in law to permit
receipt of all, or some, of both payments and legislation to allow this has been introduced during
the past several Congresses, frequently having co-sponsors well above half of both the House and
the Senate. Opponents of concurrent receipt frequently refer to it as “double dipping” because
they maintain that it represents two payments for the same condition.
The Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for FY2003 (NDAA), enacted in 2002,
created a benefit known as “combat-related special compensation,” or CRSC. CRSC provides, for
certain disabled retirees whose disability is combat-related, a cash benefit financially identical to
what concurrent receipt would provide them. The FY2004 NDAA authorized, for the first time,
actual concurrent receipt (now referred to as Concurrent Retirement and Disability Payments or
CRDP), as well as a greatly expanded CRSC program. The Ronald W. Reagan NDAA for
FY2005 further liberalized the concurrent receipt rules contained in the FY2004 NDAA and
authorized immediate concurrent receipt for those rated by the VA totaling 100%. The FY2008
NDAA expanded concurrent receipt eligibility to include those who are 100% disabled due to
unemployability and provided CRSC to those who were medically retired or retired prematurely
due to force reduction programs prior to completing 20 years of service.
Concurrent receipt continues to be one of the most misunderstood and controversial military
retirement issues and one that remains the object of intense public and congressional interest.
1
For a detailed discussion of the history of concurrent receipt, early legislative initiatives and potential alternatives, see
CRS Report 95-469, Military Retirement and Veterans’ Compensation: Concurrent Receipt Issues, by Robert L.
Goldich.
2
38 U.S.C. 5304-5304.
Congressional Research Service
1
Concurrent Receipt: Background and Issues for Congress
Military Retirement and VA Disability
Compensation
An understanding of military retirement, VA disability compensation and the interaction of these
two elements is helpful in discussing concurrent receipt.
Military Retirement
An active duty servicemember becomes entitled to retired pay, frequently referred to as “vesting,”
upon completion of 20 years of service, regardless of age. A member who retires is immediately
paid a monthly annuity based on a percentage of their final base pay or the average of their “high
three” years of base pay, depending on when they entered active duty. 3 Retired pay accrues at the
rate of 2.5% per year of service. As a result, a servicemember with 20 years of service is entitled
to 50% of their computation base, 62.5% for 25 years of service, 75% for 30 years of service, and
100% for 40 years of service. 4
An alternative retirement option, known at “Redux,” is also available for active duty
servicemembers. Redux is a reduction of 1% in the multiplier for each year the retirement is less
than 30 years of service. This results in 40% of base pay at 20 years of service, 57 ½ % at 25
years of service, but the full 75% at 30 and 100% for 40 years of service. After retirement, the
annual COLA is also reduced by 1% each year but, there is a recomputation at age 62 when both
the multiplier and COLA are adjusted to equal the “High Three” system. Members who elect
Redux at their 15th year of service also receive a taxable $30,000 Career Retention Bonus that can
be paid in lump sum or spread over six annual increments.
Reserve component servicemembers also become eligible for retirement upon completion of 20
years of qualifying service, regardless of age. However, their retired pay calculation is based on a
point system that results in a number of “equivalent years” of service. 5 In addition, a reserve
component retiree does not usually begin receiving retired pay until reaching age 60.6
While retirement eligibility at 20 years of service is the norm for active component members and
age 60 for reserve component members, there are some circumstances that result in earlier
retirement. Servicemembers found to be unfit for continued service due to physical disability may
be retired if the condition is permanent and stable and the disability is rated by DOD as 30% or
greater. These retirees are generally referred to a “Chapter 61 retirees,” a reference to Chapter 61
of Title 10 which covers disability retirement.
3
See CRS Report RL34751, Military Retirement: Background and Recent Developments, by Charles A. Henning, for a
detailed description of active duty retirement.
4
The John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for FY2007 (Section 601, P.L. 109-364) extended the military
pay table to 40 years of service and provided longevity pay increases beyond 30 years of service for the most senior
enlisted, warrant officer and officer pay grades. As a result, a servicemember who retires with 40 years of service could
qualify for 100% of base pay in retirement.
5
See CRS Report RL30802, Reserve Component Personnel Issues: Questions and Answers, by Lawrence Kapp.
6
Section 614, P.L. 109-163, January 6, 2006 reduced the age for receipt of retired pay for reserve component members
by three months for each aggregate of 90 days of certain types of active duty performed after January 28, 2008.
Attempts since then to make this benefit retroactive to September 11, 2001 have not been successful.
Congressional Research Service
2
Concurrent Receipt: Background and Issues for Congress
Personnel retired due to force management requirements and before completing 20 years of
service are generally referred to as “TERA retirees” because the FY1993 National Defense
Authorization Act7 granted Temporary Early Retirement Authority (TERA) as a manpower tool to
entice voluntary retirements during the drawdown of the early 1990s. This authority was in effect
from 1992 to 2001. TERA retired pay is calculated in the usual way (2.5% times years of service)
but there is a retired pay reduction of 1% for every year of service below 20.
Generally, military retired pay based on longevity is taxable. In certain instances, a portion of
disability retired pay may be tax-free as discussed later.
VA Disability Compensation
To qualify for VA disability compensation, a determination must be made by the VA that the
veteran8 sustained a particular injury or disease, or had a preexisting condition aggravated, while
serving in the Armed Forces. Some exceptions exist for certain conditions that may not have been
apparent during military service but which are presumed to have been service-connected. The VA
has a scale of 10 ratings, from 10% to 100%, although there is no special arithmetic relationship
between the amount of money paid for each step. Each percentage rating entitles the veteran to a
specific level of disability compensation.9 In a major difference from the DOD disability
retirement system, a veteran receiving VA disability compensation can ask for a medical
reexamination at any time (or a veteran who does not receive disability compensation upon
separation or retirement from service can be examined or reexamined later).
All VA disability compensation is tax-free, which makes receipt of VA compensation desirable,
even with the operation of the offset.
As a general rule of thumb, DOD pays for longevity while the VA pays for disability.
Interaction of DOD and VA Disability Benefits10
As veterans, military retirees can apply to the VA for disability compensation. A retiree may (1)
apply for VA compensation any time after leaving the service and (2) have his or her degree of
disability changed by the VA as the result of a later medical reevaluation, as noted above. Many
retirees seek benefits from the VA years after retirement for a condition that may have been
incurred during military service but that does not manifest itself until many years later. Typical
7
Section 4403, P.L. 102-484, October 23, 1992.
While any person who has served in the armed forces of the United States is regarded as a veteran, a military retiree is
someone who has generally completed a full active duty military career (almost always at least 20 years of service), or
who is disabled in the line of military duty and meets certain length of service and extent of disability criteria, and who
is eligible for retired pay and a broad range of nonmonetary benefits from the Department of Defense (DOD) after
retirement. A veteran is someone who has served in the armed forces (in most, but not all, cases for a few years in early
adulthood), but may not have either sufficient service or disability to be entitled to post-service retired pay and
nonmonetary benefits from DOD. Generally, all military retirees are veterans, but not all veterans are military
retirees.
9
For 2009, monthly VA disability compensation ranged from $123 for a 10% rating to $2,673 for a 100% rating.
Additional amounts are payable for special circumstances.
10
For a full discussion of the similarities and differences between the DOD and VA disability rating systems, see CRS
Report RL33991, Disability Evaluation of Military Servicemembers, by Christine Scott, et al and Don J. Jansen.
8
Congressional Research Service
3
Concurrent Receipt: Background and Issues for Congress
examples include hearing loss, some cardiovascular problems and conditions related to exposure
to Agent Orange.
The DOD and VA disability rating systems have much in common as well as significant
differences. DOD makes a determination of eligibility for disability retirement only once, at the
time the individual is separating from the service. Although DOD uses the VA rating schedule to
determine the percentage of disability, DOD measures disability, or lack thereof, against the
extent to which the individual can or cannot perform military duties. Military disability retired
pay, but not VA disability compensation, is usually taxable, unless related to a combat disability.
As a result of the current disability process, a retiree can have both a DOD and a VA disability
rating and these ratings will not necessarily be the same percentage. The percentage determined
by DOD is used to determine fitness for duty and may result in the medical separation or
disability retirement of the servicemember. The VA rating, on the other hand, was designed to
reflect the average loss of earning power. Recent studies11 have consistently recommended a
single, comprehensive medical examination that would establish a disability rating that could be
used by both DOD and the VA.
The FY2008 National Defense Authorization Act12 required a joint DOD/VA report on the
feasibility of consolidating disability evaluation systems to eliminate redundancy and duplication
by having one medical examination and a single-source disability rating. As a result, DOD and
the VA initiated a one-year pilot program at the Walter Reed Army Medical Center, the National
Naval Medical Center at Bethesda and the Malcolm Grove Medical Center at Andrews Air Force
Base. In October 2008, DOD and the VA expanded and extended from the original three sites to
18 additional sites. In January 2010, the DES pilot program will again be expanded to an
additional six sites, bringing the total to 27. As of November, 2009, 5,431 servicemembers have
participated in the pilot program.13 This rapid expansion suggests that both DOD and VA are
satisfied with the streamlined process.
Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC)
Original Provisions
The FY2003 NDAA14, as amended by the FY2004 NDAA15, authorized “Combat-related Special
Compensation” (CRSC). Military retirees with at least 20 years of service and who meet either of
the following two criteria are eligible for CRSC:
•
A disability that is “attributable to an injury for which the member was awarded
the Purple Heart,” and is not rated as less than a 10% disability by the VA; or
11
The President’s Commission on Care for America’s Returning Wounded Warriors (commonly referred to as the
Dole-Shalala commission) and the Independent Review Group on Rehabilitative Care and Administrative Processes at
Walter Reed Army Medical Center and National Naval Medical Center both contained similar recommendations
concerning disability processing.
12
Section 1612(a), P.L. 110-181, January 28, 2008.
13
DOD Press Release, “DOD and VA Announce Disability Evaluation System Pilot Expansion”, November 18, 2009.
14
Section 636, P.L. 107-314, December 2, 2002.
15
Section 642, P.L. 108-136, November 24, 2003.
Congressional Research Service
4
Concurrent Receipt: Background and Issues for Congress
•
A disability16 rating resulting from involvement in “armed conflict,” “hazardous
service,” “duty simulating war,” or “through an instrumentality of war.” This
liberal definition of “combat-related” encompasses disabilities associated with
any kind of hostile force; hazardous duty such as diving, parachuting, using
dangerous materials such as explosives; individual training and unit training and
exercises and maneuvers in the field; and “instrumentalities of war,” such as
accidents in combat vehicles or, if due to training-related activities, aboard naval
vessels or military aircraft, and accidental injuries due to occurrences, such as
munitions explosions, injuries from gases or vapors related to training for
combat.
As a result, a retiree who has been awarded a Purple Heart or who has a combat-related disability
is eligible for CRSC consideration. Retirees must apply for CRSC to their parent service and the
parent service is responsible for verifying that the disability is combat-related. This process is not
automatic; it is application-driven. See Appendix A for service contact information.
CRSC payments will generally be equal to the amount of VA disability compensation that has
been determined to be combat-related. The legislation does not end the requirement that the
retiree’s military retired pay be reduced by the amount of the total VA disability compensation the
retiree receives. Instead, CRSC beneficiaries will receive the financial equivalent of concurrent
receipt as “special compensation,” but the statute states explicitly that it is not retired pay per se.
CRSC for Military Disability (Chapter 61) and Active Component
TERA Retirees
Servicemembers with a permanent DOD disability rating of 30% or greater may be retired and
receive retired pay prior to completing 20 years of service. These retirees are generally referred to
as “Chapter 61” retirees, a reference to Chapter 61, Title 10 which governs disability retirement.
In addition to the Chapter 61 retirees with less than 20 years of service, those who voluntarily
retired under the Temporary Early Retirement Authority (TERA) during the military drawdown of
the early to mid-1990s also have less than 20 years of service. The original CRSC legislation
excluded those active duty members who retired with less than 20 years of service.
However, the FY2008 NDAA17 expanded CRSC to include Chapter 61 and active duty TERA
retirees effective January 1, 2008. Eligibility no longer requires a minimum number of years of
service or a minimum disability rating (other than the 30% noted above for disability retirement),
A 10% VA rating may qualify if it is combat-related. Eligible retirees must still apply to their
parent service to validate that the disability is combat-related.
The FY2008 NDAA included almost all reserve disability retirees in the eligible CRSC
population except those retired under 10 U.S.C. 12731b, a special provision which allows
reservists with a physical disability not incurred in the line of duty to retire with between 15 and
19 creditable years of service.
16
The FY2003 NDAA required that the disability be rated at least 60%. This requirement was repealed by the FY2004
NDAA.
17
Section 641, P.L. 110-181, January 28, 2008.
Congressional Research Service
5
Concurrent Receipt: Background and Issues for Congress
CRSC for Reserve Retirees
When CRSC was originally enacted in 2002, it required all applicants to have at least 20 years of
service creditable for computation of retired pay. As a result, reserve retirees had to have at least
7,200 reserve retirement “points” to be eligible for CRSC. As noted earlier, a reservist receives a
certain number of retirement points for varying levels of participation in the reserves, or active
duty military service. The 7,200 point figure was extraordinarily high–in fact, it could only have
been attained by a reservist who had many years of active duty military service in addition to a
long reserve career. This initially and effectively denied CRSC to almost all reservists.
However, the CRSC statute in the FY2004 NDAA clarified the service requirement for reserve
component personnel. It specified that personnel who qualify for reserve retirement by having at
least 20 years of duty creditable for reserve retirement are eligible for CRSC. While eligible for
CRSC, reserve retirees must be drawing retired pay (generally at age 60) to actually receive the
CRSC payment.
CRSC Eligibility Summary
The following populations of military retirees are eligible for CRSC:
•
Former active component members who are Purple Heart recipients or those with
combat-related disabilities compensable by the VA.
•
Former reserve component members receiving retired pay who are Purple Heart
recipients or those with a combat-related disabilities compensable by the VA.
•
Disability retirees (Chapter 61) who are Purple Heart recipients or those with a
combat-related disability compensable by the VA.
•
Those retired under the Temporary Early Retirement Authority (TERA) and who
are Purple Heart recipients or those with combat-related disabilities compensable
by the VA.
Essentially, all military retirees, except reserve component members injured while not in a duty
status, who have been awarded a Purple Heart or have combat-related disabilities compensable by
the VA are eligible for CRSC.
Military retirees with service connected disabilities which are not combat-related as defined by
the statute are not eligible for CRSC, but may be eligible for CRDP as discussed below.
Congressional Research Service
6
Concurrent Receipt: Background and Issues for Congress
Concurrent Retirement and Disability Payments
(CRDP)
Original Provisions
The FY2004 NDAA18 authorized, for the first time, actual concurrent receipt for retirees with at least
a 50% disability, regardless of the cause of disability. However, the amount of concurrent receipt will
be phased in over a 10-year period, from 2004-2013, except for 100% disabled retirees, who became
entitled to immediate concurrent receipt effective January 1, 2005. Depending on the degree of
disability, the initial amount of retired pay that the retiree could have restored would vary from $100
to $750 per month, or the actual amount of the offset, whichever is less. By 2014, the offset in retired
pay will be totally eliminated. This concurrent receipt benefit is available to all members who are
entitled to military retired pay, except Chapter 61 retirees who must have 20 years of service for
retired pay computation purposes to be eligible for CRDP.
The actual operation of the concurrent receipt benefit is complicated, due to its progressive
implementation over several years as required by law. It uses both dollar amounts and percentage
amounts and varies in accordance with the degree of disability and by calendar year (not fiscal
year) as follows:
2004
In calendar year 2004, military retirees entitled to VA disability compensation were entitled to
receive, in addition to that part of their military retired pay which is greater than the current
baseline offset (which is the lesser of VA disability compensation and the retired pay earned for
years of service) to which they are entitled, the following additional amounts of retired pay.
100% disability:
Up to $750 per month additional retired pay
90% disability:
Up to $500 per month additional retired pay
80% disability:
Up to $350 per month additional retired pay
70% disability:
Up to $250 per month additional retired pay
60% disability:
Up to $125 per month additional retired pay
50% disability:
Up to $100 per month additional retired pay
2005
In calendar year 2005, with the exception of 100% disabled retirees, military retirees entitled to
VA disability compensation were entitled to any such amounts received in 2004, as noted above,
and an additional 10% of the offset that remained in 2004.
2006
In calendar year 2006, the same procedure as in 2005 applied, but the retirees affected got an
additional 20% of their remaining offset from 2005.
18
Section 641, P.L. 108-136, November 24, 2003.
Congressional Research Service
7
Concurrent Receipt: Background and Issues for Congress
2007
In 2007, the same procedure applies but with affected retirees receiving an additional 30% of
their remaining offset from 2006.
2008
In 2008, the same procedure applies but with affected retirees receiving an additional 40% of
their remaining offset from 2007.
2009-2014
2009-
An additional 50% of their remaining offset from 2008.
2010-
An additional 60% of their remaining offset from 2009.
2011-
An additional 70% of their remaining offset from 2010.
2012-
An additional 80% of their remaining offset from 2011.
2013-
An additional 90% of their remaining offset from 2012.
2014-
All offsets would end; military retirees with at least a 50% disability would be allowed to receive their entire
military retired pay and VA disability compensation.
For those retirees who retire after 2004, their initial amounts will be the dollar amount prescribed
for each percentage of disability (the range listed above, in the section on calendar year 2004,
between $100 and $750, depending on degree of disability), plus the additional compounded
percentage of the remaining offset for that year. Thus, a retiree who first retires in, say, 2006, with
an 80% disability and $1,319 in VA offset to his retired pay, will begin receiving an additional
$621 monthly of his or her retired pay (the $350 that an 80% disabled retiree is entitled to, as
noted above, plus the additional 28% of the remaining offset amount of $969 ($1,319 - $350) or
$271, specified for 2006).
Because of the high initial amounts provided to severely disabled retirees and the compound
nature of the offset restoral percentage, this concurrent receipt benefit is “front-loaded”; that is,
most retirees will be able to concurrently receive most of their military retired pay within a few
years of enactment of the law. An example of the CRDP phase-in is at Table B-1 in Appendix B.
The impact of “front-loading” is demonstrated in Table B-2 of Appendix B.
A retiree cannot receive both CRSC and CRDP benefits. The retiree may choose whichever is
most financially advantageous to him or her and may move back and forth between either benefit
during an annual “Open Season”19 to maximize the payments received.
There are currently two groups of retirees who are not eligible for CRDP benefits. The first group
is approximately 450,000 non-disability military retirees with service connected disabilities (not
combat-related) that have been rated by the VA at 40% or less. The second group is Chapter 61
disability retirees (approximately 100,000) with service connected disabilities of 100% or less
and with less than 20 years of service.
19
The “open season” typically last for the month of January.
Congressional Research Service
8
Concurrent Receipt: Background and Issues for Congress
CRDP for Those Rated 100% Disabled
The FY2004 NDAA provided concurrent receipt for those with service-connected disabilities (not
Chapter 61) of 50% or greater as rated by the VA and phased-in this entitlement over a 10-year
period. Those rated as 100% disabled were also included in the original phase-in requirement.
However, many of the early legislative initiatives concerning concurrent receipt had focused on
those who were 100% disabled as being most deserving of relief from the offset. Some observers
felt that inclusion of this group in the phase-in process represented a potential inequity. As a
result, the original legislation was modified by the FY2005 NDAA20 which repealed the phase-in
of concurrent receipt for those with 100% service-connected disabilities and provided full
concurrent receipt effective January 1, 2005.
CRDP for Those Rated 100% Disabled Due to Unemployability
After the enactment of the FY2005 NDAA, an issue arose about whether the authorization of full
concurrent receipt for 100% disabled retirees should also apply to retirees with a physical
disability rating of less than 100%, but with what the VA terms “Individual Unemployability”
(IU)21 , and therefore received a rating for compensation of 100%. The language in the FY2005
NDAA22 stated that the immediate payment of full concurrent receipt applied to retirees
“receiving veterans’ disability compensation for a disability rated at 100%....” The law did not
mention the IU concept. According to individuals familiar with the issue, during the conference
on the FY2005 NDAA, language explicitly including the 100% due to unemployability (with less
than a 100% physical disability rating) was kept out of the final legislation on cost grounds.
The FY2006 NDAA23 contained a partial step toward inclusion of the 100% due to
unemployability (or 100% IU) by authorizing full concurrent receipt beginning on October 1,
2009, over four years earlier than the phase-in date of January 1, 2014 that was in the original
law. The issue was addressed again in the FY2008 NDAA24 which authorized full concurrent
receipt retroactive to December 31, 2004. However, this new benefit would not be effective until
October 1, 2008. According to DOD officials, payments will occur in two phases. In the first
phase, the November 2008 retiree paychecks will reflect the full CRDP for these beneficiaries.
Soon thereafter, at a date to be determined, the retirees will receive a lump sum retroactive
payment back to the January 1, 2005 effective date.25
The retroactive lump sum payment, as a restoration of taxable military retired pay, represents
taxable income in the year that it is received. As a result, amended tax returns are not an option.
20
Section 642, P.L. 108-375, October 28, 2004, Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2005.
21
The Individual Unemployability rating results from a VA decision that a service-connected disability makes a
veteran unemployable even though an average person with a similar impairment could remain gainfully employed. The
evaluation process also considers individual circumstances such as education, employment experience and other
factors.
22
Section 642(a), P.L. 108-375, October 28, 2004.
23
Section 663, P.L. 109-163, January 6, 2006.
24
Section 642, P.L. 110-181, January 28, 2008.
25
Philpott, Tom, “‘VA Retro Pay’ Review Set,” Military.Com, July 24, 2008.
Congressional Research Service
9
Concurrent Receipt: Background and Issues for Congress
CRDP for Temporary Early Retirement Authority (TERA) Retirees
The FY1993 National Defense Authorization Act26 granted temporary authority (which expired
on September 30, 2001) for the services to offer early retirements to personnel with more than 15
but less than 20 years of service. TERA was used as a manpower tool to entice voluntary
retirements during the post-Cold War drawdown. TERA retired pay was calculated in the usual
way except that there is an additional reduction of 1% for every year of service below 20. Part or
all of this latter reduction could be restored if the retiree worked in specified public service jobs
(such as law enforcement, firefighting, and education) during the period immediately following
retirement, until the point at which the retiree would have reached the 20-year mark if he or she
had remained in the service.
TERA retirees are eligible for both CRSC and CRDP even though they have less than 20 years of
service. The “special rule” for disability retirees (discussed below) does not apply to TERA
retirees since TERA was not a disability retirement, but rather a regular retirement but for those
with less than 20 years of service.
Comparison of CRSC and CRDP
CRSC and CRDP are somewhat similar but also unique and different. The table below
summarizes some of the similarities and differences between CRSC and CRDP.
Table 1. Comparison of CRSC and CRDP
CRSC
CRDP
Concurrent Receipt
Essentially full concurrent receipt for
disabilities determined to be combatrelated
Partial concurrent receipt until
completion of the phase-in (2014)
Enrollment
Must apply to parent service for
verification that disability is combat-related
Automatic–initiated by DFAS
Type of Compensation
Special compensation (not retired pay)
Restored retired pay
Tax Liability
Non-taxable
Taxable
Court Ordered Liability
Court ordered division does not apply
Court ordered division applies
Subject to Garnishment for
Alimony and/or Child Support
Yes
Yes
Note: DFAS is the Defense Finance and Accounting Service.
26
Section 4403, P.L. 102-484, October 23, 1992.
Congressional Research Service
10
Concurrent Receipt: Background and Issues for Congress
The “Special Rule” for Disability Retirees
Background
In 1891 Congress first prohibited payment of both military retired pay and a disability pension
since it represented dual or overlapping compensation for the same purpose. The original law was
modified in 1941 and the present system of VA disability compensation offsetting military retired
pay was adopted in 1944. Under this system, retired military personnel are required to waive a
portion of their retired pay equal to the amount of VA disability compensation, a dollar-for-dollar
offset.27
Today, servicemembers determined to be unfit for continued service and who have a permanent
and stable disqualifying condition may qualify for disability retirement, commonly referred to as
a Chapter 61 retirement. Disability retirement eligibility is based on having a DOD disability
rating of 30% or greater and at least eight years of creditable service or a disability resulting from
active duty or in the line of duty. 28 As a result, some disability retirees are retired before becoming
eligible for longevity retirement while others have completed 20 or more years of service.
A servicemember retired for disability may select one of two available options for calculating
their monthly retired pay:29
1. Longevity Formula. Retired pay is computed by multiplying the years of service times 2.5%
and then times the pay base.
2. Disability Formula. Retired pay is computed by multiplying the DOD disability percentage by
the pay base.
The maximum retired pay calculation under either formula cannot exceed 75% of base pay.30 The
retired pay computed under the disability formula is fully taxed unless the disability is the result
of a combat-related injury. Since the disability percentage method usually results in higher retired
pay, it is most commonly selected.
The “Special Rule”
As noted earlier, an individual cannot receive two separate lifelong government annuities from
federal agencies for the same purpose or qualifying event, i.e. disability retired pay and VA
disability compensation. To preclude this, the “special rule” states that:
the amount of the payment ... for any month shall be reduced by the amount (if any) by
which the amount of a member’s retired pay under Chapter 61...exceeds the amount equal to
27
For a detailed explanation of the original and later laws, see CRS Report 95-469, Military Retirement and Veterans'
Compensation: Concurrent Receipt Issues, by Robert L. Goldich.
28
10 U.S.C. 1201.
29
10 U.S.C. 1401.
30
10 U.S.C. 1401.
Congressional Research Service
11
Concurrent Receipt: Background and Issues for Congress
2 ½ percent of the member’s years of creditable service multiplied by the member’s retired
pay base...31
Application of the “special rule” therefore caps the concurrent receipt payment at the level to
which the retiree could have qualified based solely on years of service or longevity. In some
instances, the “special rule” could limit or completely eliminate the concurrent receipt payment.
In other instances, application of the rule may not result in any changes. Each situation is unique
(rank, years of service, DOD and VA disability ratings, and the disability percentage attributable
to combat) and requires independent calculations.
It appears that those most vulnerable to the reduction of CRSC due to the “special rule” will be
active duty servicemembers with significantly less than 20 years of service and a high VA
disability rating. Others potentially impacted would be reserve members with little active duty.
Several examples of an CRSC calculations for disability retirees are included at Appendix C.
Retroactive Payments
Responsibility for making payments under the original Concurrent Receipt legislation was
assigned to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) in coordination with the
Department of Veterans’ Affairs (VA). However, because of statutory changes, difficulties in
policy development, incompatible automated systems, and the timing of the CRSC and CRDP
programs, a large number of retirees became entitled to retroactive payments between April 2004
and August 2006. The situation was further exacerbated by retirees whose disability rating was
changed (increased or decreased) and by retirees who migrated between CRDP and CRSC as
combat-related status was approved by the services or during an annual Open Season that
permitted some retirees to select between CRDP and CRSC. For retirees whose disability rating
was increased, the higher payment is retroactive to the date that they applied for reevaluation. Exspouse pay entitlements have also complicated pay calculations for those receiving retroactive
CRDP payments. As a result of these difficulties, in September 2006, DFAS initiated a “Retro
Project” to address the timeliness in fully compensating these retirees.
An existing DFAS contract with Lockheed Martin was expanded to include the processing of
retroactive payments. The original intent was to fully automate the process but the software that
was developed had an error rate of 17% and could not be used.32 As a result, processing resorted
to manual calculations, many of which were lengthy, complex, and time consuming. The
processing was accomplished on a “first in, first out” basis so even some of the more
straightforward cases were delayed while earlier, but complicated, cases were processed. In other
instances, required information was located in VA Regional Offices rather than a central
repository and took time to retrieve and forward to DFAS.
When the Retro Project began in September 2006, it was estimated that the population of
potentially eligible retirees was approximately 133,000. As the program progressed, an additional
85,000 additional retirees were identified for a total population in excess of 215,000.33 This
31
10 U.S.C. 1413a(b)(3) for CRSC and 10 U.S.C. 1414 for CRDP.
Philpott, Tom, “VA Retro Pay: A Deadline Missed,” Military.Com, November 30, 2007.
33
William H. McMichael, “Report Questions Retro-Pay Denials,” Army Times, July 28, 2008.
32
Congressional Research Service
12
Concurrent Receipt: Background and Issues for Congress
population could be owed back payments from DOD, VA or both. In other cases, no additional
payments were due.
Since the originally projected completion date of November 15, 2007, the Retro Project
experienced persistent missed deadlines and failed to adequately communicate with the affected
retiree population even though a Hotline and website were established to respond to inquiries.
Many retirees waited for months or even years for their long-awaited retroactive payments. It is
estimated that 8,70034 retirees died while awaiting their retroactive payments and the payment
will now go to their surviving spouses or the retiree’s estate.
A recent investigation into the Retro Project by the House Oversight and Government Reform
Subcommittee on Domestic Policy revealed significant program delays and poor performance.
The subcommittee report35, released in conjunction with a hearing on the Retro Project, found
that approximately 60,051 payments and over 28,000 retiree notifications that denied Retro Pay
were made without a required quality assurance review. The review had been circumvented in an
effort to expedite payments and eliminate the backlog. At the hearing, DFAS officials committed
to a complete quality assurance review of all of these cases.
According to the DFAS website,36 all retroactive accounts had been processed by July 20, 2008
and DFAS had paid out over $149 million in entitlements. However, another cycle of retroactive
payments may be required by the recent extension of concurrent receipt to those rated as 100%
due to unemployability by the VA. This legislation requires that payments commence on October
1, 2008 but will be retroactive to December 31, 2004. The timeliness goal established by DFAS
requires that retroactive claims be processed within 30 days of receipt.
It appears that there will always be some level of retroactive payment activity required due to the
time it takes the VA to process disability claims. In these instances, payments are generally made
retroactive to the date of application.
Major Legislation from the First Session of
CongressConcurrent Receipt Legislative Initiatives During
the 111th Congress
First Session
The FY2010 President’s Budget proposed an expansion of Concurrent Receipt by extending
CRDP to Chapter 61 retirees, a population of approximately 100,000 that had been excluded from
all previous concurrent receipt legislation. The administration recommended a 5-year phase-in of
this expansion, somewhat similar to the 10-year phase-in of CRDP for retirees with 20 or more
years of service as previously discussed (see the Original Provisions of Concurrent Retirement
and Disability Payments on p.7). The phase-in, by year and percentage of VA disability is shown
in Table 2.
34
Military Officers’ Association of America, “Congressional Report Blasts VA Retro Program,” July 31, 2008.
Staff Report of the Domestic Policy Subcommittee Majority Staff, Oversight and Government Reform Committee,
“Die or Give Up Trying”: How Poor Contractor Performance, Government Mismanagement and the Erosion of
Quality Controls Denied Thousands of Disabled Veterans Timely and Accurate Retroactive Retired Pay Awards, July
15, 2008. The report is available at http://domesticpolicy.oversight.house.gov/documents/20080715083250.pdf.
36
http://www.dfas.mil/retiredpay/retroactivepayment.html.
35
Congressional Research Service
13
Concurrent Receipt: Background and Issues for Congress
and Disability Payments on p.7). The phase-in, by year and percentage of VA disability is shown
in Table 2.
Table 2. Proposed Phase-In of CRDP for Chapter 61 Retirees
Year
Eligible Population
2010
VA disability rating of 90-100%, including 100%
unemployables
2011
VA disability rating of 70% or greater
2012
VA disability rating of 50% or greater
2013
VA disability rating of 30% or greater
2014
Any VA disability rating
The House bill on the FY2010 NDAA (H.R. 2647) did not initially include the provision on
concurrent receipt.37 Shortly after approval of the House bill, the proposal was introduced
separately as H.R. 2990. This legislation included all aspects of the administration
recommendation but only as a temporary, one-year program due to funding constraints. On June
23, 2009, H.Res. 572, the rule which provided for consideration of H.R. 2647 (the House version
of the FY2010 NDAA), added the text of H.R. 2990 to the end of H.R. 2647 where it appears as
Division D. There was no similar provision regarding concurrent receipt in the Senate bill (S.
1390) on the FY2010 NDAA.
During the conference committee, the provision was not adopted. However, the Joint Explanatory
Statement 38 noted that, “The Administration’s concurrent receipt proposal was not included in
this bill as acceptable and specific offsets were not proposed by the Administration”.
Issues for the Second Session ofSecond Session
The President’s Budget for FY2011 again proposed a permanent expansion of concurrent receipt
that was identical to the proposal contained in the FY2010 Budget: expand the Concurrent
Receipt and Disability Payments (CRDP) program to approximately 100,000 disability retirees
(Chapter 61) using the same 5-year phased approach as reflected in Table 2 above but starting in
2011 and continuing through 2015.
During this session, the proposed expansion, in modified form, became Section 609 of H.R. 4213,
the Tax Extenders Act of 2009. In H.R. 4213, the program was introduced as a temporary 2-year
program, apparently in an effort to reduce the cost of full implementation. On January 1, 2011,
approximately 12,000 disability retirees with a VA disability rating of 90% or greater would have
become eligible for CRDP. This would have been followed by a October 1, 2011 further
expansion to an additional 20,000 disability retirees with a rating of 70% or above. It was
estimated that this modified expansion would cost approximately $686 million over 10 years.
37
H.Rept. 111-166, June 18, 2009.
H.Rept. 111-288, Conference Report on the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010, October 7,
2009, p. 669.
38
Congressional Research Service
14
Concurrent Receipt: Background and Issues for Congress
However, unless additional funding could be identified, the program would terminate on October
1, 2012 and these 32,000 military retirees would again have their military retired pay offset by
their VA disability compensation. This temporary expansion of concurrent receipt was supported
by the House but the provision was removed by the Senate, along with other spending measures
in the original bill. Before final passage and enactment, the name of this legislation was changed
to the Unemployment Compensation Extension Act of 2010.39
The expansion of concurrent receipt proposed by the President was reviewed by the House Armed
Services Committee but was not included in the House-passed version of the FY2011 NDAA.
The Senate Report on the FY2011 NDAA did not address the issue of concurrent receipt.
Issues for Congress
Extend CRDP to Chapter 61 Disability Retirees
As previously discussed, the FY2008 NDAA extended CRSC eligibility to Chapter 61 retirees
who retired due to combat-related physical disability prior to completing 20 years of service.
However, Chapter 61 retirees with service-connected disabilities rated less than 50% or with less
than 20 years of service are not eligible for concurrent receipt (CRDP). Congress could expand
the CRDP provision to include this cohort. This option would extend CRDP eligibility to
approximately 100,000 additional disability retirees at an estimated 10-year cost of $5.8 billion.
Eliminate the CRDP Phase-In or Adjust the Completion Date
As noted earlier, the CRDP phase-in from 2004 to 2014 was “front loaded” so that most retirees
would receive most of their restored retired pay within a few years of enactment of the original
legislation in 2004. As demonstrated by the CRDP calculations at Appendix B, savings beyond
2009 are incremental, at best. This suggests that the phase-in cold be eliminated early at relatively
37
H.Rept. 111-166, June 18, 2009.
H.Rept. 111-288, Conference Report on the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010, October 7,
2009, p. 669.
38
Congressional Research Service
14
Concurrent Receipt: Background and Issues for Congress
low cost. According to a DOD estimate, the phase-in could be eliminated in 2011, three years
earlier than the current schedule, at a cost of $40 million. This option would impact
approximately 160,000 retirees.
Extend CRDP to those with a 40% or less VA Disability Rating
At present, only those military retirees with service-connected disabilities rated at 50% or greater
are eligible for CRDP. Congress could revise the concurrent receipt legislation to include the
entire population of military retirees with service-connected disabilities. This option would
extend CRDP to approximately 450,000 additional retirees at an estimated 10-year cost of $22.3
billion.3940
39
40
P.L. 111-205, July 22, 2010.
Cost estimates in this section were provided by the Comptroller, Office of the Secretary of Defense.
Congressional Research Service
15
Concurrent Receipt: Background and Issues for Congress
Combine CRSC and CRDP into a Single Program
With five years remaining for the CRDP phase-in and only two eligible populations still excluded
from concurrent receipt benefits, Congress could combine both programs (CRSC and CRDP) into
a single, comprehensive program. If this were done, any military retiree, retired for longevity or
disability, with a VA disability rating would be eligible. A combined program such as this would
be equitable, reduce confusion, eliminate redundant administration and minimize errors through
total automation of the process. It would also obviate the need for an application process (CRSC)
and potentially eliminate the need for an annual Open Season.
Modify or Eliminate the “Special Rule”
With the extension of CRSC to Chapter 61 disability retirees, the “special rule” may soon begin
to factor significantly into the concurrent receipt calculations. For those whose CRSC payment is
limited or eliminated by the “special rule”, there may be a perceived inequity between CRSC
recipients with 20 or more years of service (longevity retirees) and Chapter 61 (disability retirees
who generally have less than 20 years of service) retirees, especially for disability retirees from
Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) and Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF).
To resolve this potential issue, Congress could modify or eliminate the “special rule” or limit its
application to specific military operations. However, some observers may note that eliminating or
modifying the “special rule” would result in paying for the same disability twice, by DOD and by
VA. It might also complicate future initiatives to simplify and streamline post service
compensation whereby DOD would only compensate for years or service and the VA would only
compensate for disability, as recommended by Dole/Shalala.40
39
Cost estimates in this section were provided by the Comptroller, Office of the Secretary of Defense.
41
41
“Serve, Support, Simplify: Report of the President’s Commission on Care for America’s Returning Wounded
Warriors”, co-chaired by Bob Dole and Donna Shalala, July 2007.
40
Congressional Research Service
1516
Concurrent Receipt: Background and Issues for Congress
Appendix A. Service Contact Information
The services have each established websites and toll-free phone numbers to assist retirees with
their Concurrent Receipt concerns.
Army
U.S. Army Human Resources Command
Attn: AHRC-DZB-CRSC
200 Stovall Street
Alexandria, VA 22332-0470
Phone: 1-866-281-3254
website: http://www.crsc.army.mil/
Navy and Marine Corps
Secretary of the Navy
Council of Review Boards
Attn: CRSC Branch
720 Kennon Street SC, Suite 309
Washington Navy Yard, D.C. 20374-5023
Phone: 1-877-366-2772
website: http://www.hq.navy.mil/ncpb/CRSCB/combatrelated.htm
Air Force
U.S. Air Force
Disability Division (CRSC)
HQ AFPC/DPPDC
550 C Street West, Suite 6
Randolph AFB, TX 78150-4708
Phone: 1-800-616-3775
website: http://ask.afpc.randolph.af.mil/main_content.asp?prods3=285&prods2=66&prods1=56
Congressional Research Service
1617
Concurrent Receipt: Background and Issues for Congress
Appendix B. Operation of the CRDP Phase-In
Assume that in 2004 a 20-year military retiree with a 50% VA-rated disability is entitled to
$1,250 a month in retired pay and $728 per month in disability compensation. With the offset in
effect, the retiree would have received $522 per month in retired pay ($1,250 minus $728) and
$728 per month from the VA for a monthly total of $1,250.
With CRDP, the individual would receive an additional $100 per month in retired pay restoration
(the rate for 50% disabled) in 2004 for a monthly retired pay of $622 ( $522 plus $100 for the
50% disability) and $728 per month from the VA.
The remaining offset of $728 would be phased-in between 2005 and 2014 as follows:
Table B-1. CRDP Phase-in, 2005-2014
Year
Percentage Increase
Added to
Retired Pay
Of
Adjusted
Retired Pay
2005
+10% of (728-100) + 100 = 163
$522
$685
2006
+20% of (728-163) + 163 = 276
$522
$798
2007
+30% of (728-276) +276 = 411
$522
$933
2008
+40% of (728-411) + 411 = 538
$522
$1,060
2009
+50% of (728-538) +538 = 633
$522
$1,155
2010
+60% of (728-633) + 633 = 690
$522
$1,212
2011
+70% of (728-690) + 690 = 717
$522
$1,239
2012
+80% of (728-717) + 717 = 726
$522
$1,248
2013
+90% of (728)-726) + 726 = 728
$522
$1,250
2014
Phase-In Complete. Retiree would receive $1,250 per month in retired
pay and $728 per month in disability compensation for a total of $1,980
when he/she had been receiving only $1,250 prior to CRDP.
Note: This example does not reflect annual Cost-of-Living Allowance (COLA) increases to retired pay or
increases in VA disability compensation. Calculations have been rounded to whole dollar amounts.
a.
The formula for this calculation is:
__% x (Current Baseline Offset-Prior Year CRDP) + Prior Year CRDP = Annual Retired Pay Increase
Using the above example and the following table, the amount of retired pay can be computed for
any year without first having to compute all prior years from 2004 to date, as done above. For
instance, the amount of retired pay in 2008 would be found from the formula:
((Current Baseline Offset – 2004 Base) x Phase-in %) + 2004 Base = CRDP, thus
(($728 - $100) x 69.76%) + $100 = CRDP,
($628 x 69.76%) + $100 = CRDP,
$438 + $100 = $538 = CRDP for 2008
Congressional Research Service
1718
Concurrent Receipt: Background and Issues for Congress
Table B-2. CRDP Compound Phase-In Percentages, 2005-2014
Year
Compound Percentage Amount
2005
10.00%
2006
28.00%
2007
49.60%
2008
69.76%
2009
84.88%
2010
93.95%
2011
98.18%
2012
99.64%
2013
99.96%
2014
100%
Source: Comptroller, Office of the Secretary of Defense
Note: This example does not reflect the annual Cost-of-Living Allowance (COLA) increases to retired
pay or increases in VA disability compensation
Congressional Research Service
1819
Concurrent Receipt: Background and Issues for Congress
Appendix C. CRSC Calculations for Disability
Retirees
Several examples of the CRSC calculations that demonstrate the effect of the “Special Rule”
would include the following:
Example 1: Private First Class (E3); four years of service; $1,800 pay base; 40% DOD disability
rating; 60% VA disability rating ($900 per month).4142
Prior to concurrent receipt, this disabled retiree would have received $720 per month in disability
retired pay based on disability percentage ($1,800 pay base x 40%) that would have been totally
offset by $900 in VA compensation and therefore would have received only the $900 per month in
VA disability pay.
However, once the parent service has confirmed that all of the VA disability rating is combatrelated the member would be entitled as follows:
First, determine the most advantageous retirement formula (longevity or disability):4243
1. Longevity. 4 years x 2.5% (annual retirement accrual) = 10% x $1,800 pay base = $180 per
month.
or
2. Disability Retired Pay. 40% (DOD disability rating) x $1,800 (pay base) = $720 per month.
Second, determine the retired pay after the offset:
$720 (gross retired pay) - $900 (VA disability compensation) = $0.
Third, determine the maximum CRSC amount (the lesser of gross retired pay and VA disability
compensation determined to be combat-related):
$720 (gross retired pay) or $900 (combat-related VA disability compensation) = $720
(maximum CRSC).
Finally, apply the disability “Special Rule”:
Reduce the maximum CRSC amount ($720) by the amount the gross retired pay exceeds the
longevity retired pay (this amount represents that amount paid by DOD strictly for disability):
$720 – ($720-$180) = $720 - $540 = $180
4142
Amounts for the pay base and VA disability compensation closely resemble the rates in effect for 2008 but have been
rounded for the sake of simplicity.
4243
10 U.S.C. 1401(b) allows the individual to select the formula that is most advantageous to them. For the purpose of
these examples, it is assumed that the formula that yields the highest monthly retired pay is the one chosen.
Congressional Research Service
1920
Concurrent Receipt: Background and Issues for Congress
With CRSC, this disabled retiree would receive $0 from DOD in retired pay, $180 in CRSC and
$900 in VA disability compensation or a total of $1,080 per month, an increase of $180 per
month.
Example 2: Sergeant (E5); eight years of service; $2,500 pay base; 70% DOD disability rating;
VA disability rating of 90% ($1,500 per month).
Prior to concurrent receipt, this disabled retiree would have received $1,750 per month in
disability retired pay that would have been offset by $1,500 in VA disability pay for net retired
pay of $250 plus $1,500 in VA disability compensation.
However, once the parent service has confirmed that all of the VA disability rating is combatrelated the member would be entitled as follows:
First, determine the most advantageous retirement formula (longevity or disability):
1. Longevity. 8 years x 2.5% = 20% x $2500 pay base = $500.
or
2. Disability Retired Pay. 70% (DOD disability rating) x $2,500 (pay base) = $1,750.
Second, determine the retired pay after the offset:
$1,750 (gross retired pay) - $1,500 (VA disability compensation) = $250.
Third, determine the maximum CRSC amount (the lesser of gross retired pay and VA disability
compensation determined to be combat-related):
$1,750 (gross retired pay) or $1,500 (combat-related VA disability compensation) = $1,500
(maximum CRSC).
Finally, apply the disability “Special Rule”:
Reduce the maximum CRSC amount ($1,500) by the amount gross retired pay exceeds the
longevity retired pay (this amount represents that amount paid by DOD strictly for disability):
$1,500 – ($1,750 - $500) = $1,500 - $1,250 = $250.
With CRSC, this disabled retiree would receive $250 from DOD in retired pay, $250 in CRSC
and $1,500 in VA disability compensation or a total of $2,000 per month, an increase of $250.
Congressional Research Service
2021
Concurrent Receipt: Background and Issues for Congress
Author Contact Information
Charles A. Henning
Specialist in Military Manpower Policy
chenning@crs.loc.gov, 7-8866
Congressional Research Service
2122