.
Unemployment Insurance:
Available Unemployment Benefits
and Legislative Activity
Julie M. Whittaker
Specialist in Income Security
Alison M. Shelton
Analyst in Income Security
Julie M. Whittaker
SpecialistKatelin P. Isaacs
Analyst in Income Security
April 2, 2009May 5, 2010
Congressional Research Service
7-5700
www.crs.gov
RL33362
CRS Report for Congress
Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress
c11173008
.
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
Summary
Various benefits may be available to unemployed workers to provide income support. When
eligible workers lose their jobs, the Unemployment Compensation (UC) program may provide
up
to 26 weeks of income support through the payment of regular UC benefits. UC benefits may be extended for
additional weeks at the state level by the Extended Benefit (EB) program if certain economic
situations within the state exist. In July 2008, a new temporary unemployment benefit, the
Emergency Unemployment Compensation (EUC08) program, began. EUC08 now provides up to
an additional 20 weeks of unemployment benefits. In addition, if certain economic conditions
exist within the state, a second tier of EUC08 benefits may be available for up to an additional 13
weeks of EUC08 benefitsUnemployment
benefits may be extended for up to 53 weeks by the temporarily authorized Emergency
Unemployment Compensation (EUC08) program and additionally extended for up 13 or 20
weeks by the permanent Extended Benefit (EB) program if certain economic situations exist
within the state. Certain groups of workers who lose their jobs because of international
competition may qualify for additional or supplemental income support through Trade
Adjustment Act (TAA) programs.
Unemployed workers may be eligible to receive Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA)
benefits if they are not eligible to receive UC benefits and if
for regular UC and if their unemployment may be directly attributed to a declared major disaster.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, P.L. 111-5 (the 2009 stimulus package),
contains several provisions affecting unemployment benefits. The stimulus package will increase
unemployment benefits by $25 per week through December 2009. The supplemental $25 per
week benefit will be available to all individuals receiving regular unemployment, Extended
Benefits (EB), Emergency Unemployment Compensation (EUC08) benefits, Trade Adjustment
Act (TAA) programs, and Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA), and will be grandfathered
for individuals who are receiving benefits under one of these programs in the last week of
December 2009. The stimulus package also extends the temporary EUC08 program through end2009, to be financed by the U.S. Treasury through general revenues. The stimulus package
provides for 100% federal financing of the EB program through January 1, 2010, and allows
states the option of temporarily easing EB eligibility requirements. The stimulus package
suspends income taxation on the first $2,400 of unemployment benefits received in 2009. In
addition, states would not owe or accrue interest, through December 2010, on federal loans to
states for the payment of unemployment benefits.
Finally, the 2009 stimulus package provides
attributed to a declared major disaster.
The authorization for the EUC08 program expires on June 2, 2010. Those beneficiaries receiving
tier I, II, III, or IV EUC08 benefits before May 29, 2010, are “grandfathered” for their remaining
weeks of eligibility for that particular tier only. There will be no new entrants into any tier of the
EUC08 program after May 29, 2010. If an individual is eligible to continue to receive his or her
remaining EUC08 tier benefit after May 29, 2010, that individual would not be entitled to tier II
benefits once those tier I benefits were exhausted.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA), P.L. 111-5, contained provisions
affecting unemployment benefits: temporarily increased benefits by $25 per week (Federal
Additional Compensation, or FAC); extended the EUC08 program through the end of 2009;
provided for 100% federal financing of the EB program through January 1, 2010; and allowed
states the option of temporarily easing EB eligibility requirements. ARRA also suspended income
taxation on the first $2,400 of unemployment benefits received in 2009. In addition, states would
not owe or accrue interest, through December 2010, on federal loans to states for the payment of
unemployment benefits. ARRA also provided for a special transfer of up to $7 billion in federal
monies to state unemployment programs as “incentive payments” for changing certain state UC
laws. In addition, the stimulus package would transfer a total of as well as transferred $500 million to the states for
administering their unemployment programs. (For more information on unemployment provisions
in the stimulus package, please see CRS Report R40368, Unemployment Insurance Provisions in
the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.)
The President’s 2010 budget outline suggests that legislation is needed to make the UC system
more responsive to changing economic conditions, with a focus on the EB program. In a letter
transmitting the Views and Estimates of the House Committee on Ways and Means on aspects of
the federal budget for FY2010, the Committee states that it will continue to monitor the
effectiveness of the stimulus package (P.L. 111-5), including unemployment insurance programs.
Congressional Research Service
administering unemployment programs.
P.L. 111-92 expanded the number of weeks available in the EUC08 program through the creation
of two additional tiers. P.L. 111-118 extended the EUC08 program, 100% federal financing of the
EB program, and the $25 FAC benefit through the end of February 2010. P.L. 111-144 extended
the EUC08 program, 100% federal financing of the EB program, and the $25 FAC benefit to
April 5, 2010.
On March 10, 2010, the Senate passed H.R. 4213, the Tax Extenders Act of 2010. H.R. 4213
would extend the availability of EUC08, 100% federal financing of EB, and the $25 FAC
benefits, through the end of December 2010. Because the original bill was amended by the Senate
in the nature of a substitute (S.Amdt. 3336), the Senate-passed version must now go back to the
House for consideration.
On April 15, 2010, the President signed P.L. 111-157, the Continuing Extension Act of 2010, into
law. P.L. 111-157 extends the availability of EUC08, 100% federal financing of EB, and the $25
FAC benefits, until the week ending on or before June 2, 2010.
Congressional Research Service
.
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
Contents
Introduction ................................................................................................................................1
Unemployment Compensation (UC)....................................................................................................2
Authorization..................................................................................................................2
Appropriation and Outlays ..............................................................................................2
Administration ..................................2
Administration ..............................................................................3
Eligibility for Regular Unemployment Compensation .........................................3
UC Eligibility ..................3
Broad Federal Guidelines Result in Different State Requirements....................................3
Base Period.............................................................................................3
Broad Federal Guidelines Result in Different State Requirements....................................3
Base Period........................3
Qualifying Wages or Employment...................................................................................4
2009 Stimulus Provisions Relating to Regular Unemployment Compensation .................5
Data Collection Considerations .......................................................................................6
Determination and Duration of Regular Unemployment Compensation .................................6
UC Benefit Financing: Unemployment Taxes on Employers..................................................8
Federal Unemployment Tax Act .......................3
Qualifying Wages or Employment...................................................................................4
2009 Stimulus Provisions Relating to Regular Unemployment Compensation .................5
Data Collection Considerations 8
ARRA Temporary Changes Federal Financing of Unemployment Benefits......................9
State Unemployment Tax Acts.......................................................................................5
UC Benefit Determination and Duration....................9
Outstanding Loans from the Federal Unemployment Account ....................................... 12
Emergency Unemployment Compensation Program................................................................6
UC Benefit Financing: Unemployment Taxes on Employers.. 12
EUC08 Benefit Amounts, Tiers and Duration ..................................................8
Outstanding Loans from the Federal Unemployment Account (FUA) ............................ 12
Extended Benefit (EB) Program .................... 14
Tier I............................................................................................................................. 14
Tier II ........................................................................................................................... 14
Tier III .......................................................................................................................... 14
Tier IV.......................................................................................................... 12
EB Triggers May be Reviewed in 2010 ............................................................................... 13
EB Eligibility Requirements Beyond Requirements for Regular UC .................................... 14
2009 Stimulus Provisions Affecting EB Level and Duration ................................................ 16
2009 Stimulus Provisions Affecting EB Financing............................................................... 16
Emergency Unemployment Compensation (EUC08) Program ................................................... 17
EUC08 Benefits Tiers and Duration .................................................................................... 17
Tier I............................................................................................................................. 18
Tier II ........................................................................................................................... 18
Tier I EUC08 Eligibility Requirements................................................................................ 18
Tier II EUC08 Eligibility Requirements .............................................................................. 19
EUC08 Financing ............................................................................................................... 20
EUC08 and EB Interactions ................................................................................................ 20
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA) ............................................................................... 21
DUA Eligibility................................................................................................................... 21
DUA Benefit Determination and Duration........................................................................... 21
DUA Financing................................................................................................................... 22
Legislative Issues ...................................................................................................................... 22
111th Congress..................................................................................................................... 22
2010 Budget.................................................................................................................. 22
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 ....................................................... 22
Tables
Table 1. State Unemployment Compensation Benefits Amounts, January 2009............................6
Table 2. State Unemployment Taxes: Taxable Wage Base and Rates, January 2009.....................9
Table 3. Revenue and Spending Associated With Unemployment Compensation,
FY2001-FY2009.................................................................................................................... 11
Congressional Research Service
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
Contacts
Author Contact Information ...................................................................................................... 25
Congressional Research Service
................ 14
Special Case: Exhausted Tier II EUC08 Benefits Before November 8, 2009 ........................ 15
No Retroactive Payments for Special Case .................................................................... 15
Tier I EUC08 Eligibility Requirements................................................................................ 16
First Claimed Regular UC Benefits On or After May 7, 2006 ........................................ 16
Exhausted Regular UC Benefit...................................................................................... 16
“20 Weeks” of Full-Time Insured Employment or Equivalent........................................ 16
Tier II EUC08 Eligibility Requirements .............................................................................. 16
Exhausted Tier I EUC08 Benefit ................................................................................... 16
Tier III EUC08 Eligibility Requirements ............................................................................. 17
Exhausted Tier II EUC08 Benefit .................................................................................. 17
At or After the Period of Tier II EUC08 Exhaustion, the State Must Currently
Have At Least 6% Unemployment Rate...................................................................... 17
No Retroactive Payments .............................................................................................. 17
Tier IV EUC08 Eligibility Requirements ............................................................................. 17
Exhausted Tier I, Tier II, and Tier III EUC08 Benefits ................................................... 17
At or After the Period of Tier III EUC08 Exhaustion, the State Must Currently
Have At Least 8.5% Unemployment Rate................................................................... 17
No Retroactive Payments .............................................................................................. 18
EUC08 Financing ............................................................................................................... 18
EUC08 and EB Interactions ................................................................................................ 18
Extended Benefit Program ........................................................................................................ 18
EB Triggers May be Reviewed in 2010 ............................................................................... 19
EB Eligibility Requirements Beyond Requirements for Regular UC .................................... 21
Congressional Research Service
.
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
2009 Stimulus Provisions Affecting EB Level and Duration ................................................ 22
2009 Stimulus Provisions Affecting EB Financing............................................................... 23
Short-time Compensation (Work Sharing) ................................................................................. 23
Legislative Issues ...................................................................................................................... 24
111th Congress..................................................................................................................... 24
2010 Budget.................................................................................................................. 24
P.L. 111-5, The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 ............................... 25
P.L. 111-92, The Worker, Homeownership and Business Assistance Act of 2009............ 27
P.L. 111-118, The Department of Defense Appropriations Act ....................................... 27
P.L. 111-144, The Temporary Extension Act of 2010 ..................................................... 27
P.L. 111-157, The Continuing Extension Act of 2010..................................................... 27
Current Legislation ....................................................................................................... 27
Figures
Figure A-1. Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits ................................ 29
Tables
Table 1. State Unemployment Compensation Benefits Amounts, January 2010............................6
Table 2. State Unemployment Taxes: Taxable Wage Base and Rates, January 2010................... 10
Table 3. Revenue and Spending Associated With Unemployment Compensation,
FY2001-FY2010.................................................................................................................... 12
Table B-1. Emergency Unemployment Compensation Program: Public Law, Benefits,
Effective Dates, and Financing............................................................................................... 30
Appendixes
Appendix A. Unemployment Insurance Benefits ....................................................................... 29
Appendix B. Summary of EUC08 Program ............................................................................... 30
Contacts
Author Contact Information ...................................................................................................... 31
Congressional Research Service
.
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
Introduction
A variety of benefits may be available to unemployed workers to provide them with income
support during a spell of unemployment. The cornerstone of this income support is the joint
federal-state Unemployment Compensation (UC) program, which may provide income support
through the payment of UC benefits. for up to a maximum of 26 weeks.1 Other programs that may
provide workers with income
support are more specialized. They may target special groups of
workers, be automatically
triggered by certain economic conditions, be temporarily created by
Congress with a set
expiration date, or target typically ineligible workers through a disaster
declaration.
UC benefits may be extended at the state level by the permanent Extended Benefit (EB) program
if high
unemployment exists within the state. Once regular unemployment benefits are exhausted,
the EB
program may provide up to an additional 13 or 20 weeks of benefits, depending on worker
eligibility, state law, and economic conditions in the state. The EB program is funded 50% by the
federal government and 50% by the states, butalthough the 2009 stimulus package (P.L. 111-5, as
amended) temporarily provides for 100%
federal funding of the EB program through December 2009.
A new .
A temporary unemployment insurance program, the Emergency Unemployment
Compensation (EUC08) program, began in July 2008. This is the eighth time Congress has
created a federal temporary program that has extended unemployment compensation during an
economic slowdown.1 The EUC08 benefit is 100% federally funded. State unemployment
compensation (UC) agencies administer the EUC08 benefit along with regular UC benefits.
The EUC08 program provides two tiers of benefits. The first tier provides up to 20 additional
weeks of unemployment benefits and is available to all workers who are still unemployed and
who have exhausted regular UC (or EB depending on whether the state has elected to pay EUC08
or EB first). The second tier of EUC08 benefits is available to workers in states with high
unemployment and provides up to a maximum of an additional 13 weeks of tier II EUC08
benefits (for up to a cumulative 33 weeks of EUC08 benefits). 2 Compensation
(EUC08) program, began in July 2008. The authorization for the EUC08 program expires on June
2, 2010. Those beneficiaries receiving tier I, II, III, or IV EUC08 benefits before May 29, 2010
(May 30, 2010, in New York) are “grandfathered” for their remaining weeks of eligibility for that
particular tier only. There will be no new entrants into any tier of the EUC08 program after May
29, 2010. If an individual is eligible to continue to receive his or her remaining EUC08 tier I
benefit after May 29, 2010, that individual would not be entitled to tier II benefits once those tier
I benefits were exhausted. This was the eighth time Congress has created a federal temporary
program that has extended unemployment compensation during an economic slowdown.2 The
EUC08 benefit is 100% federally funded. State UC agencies administer the EUC08 benefit along
with regular UC benefits. See Appendix A for a diagram of the various unemployment benefits
available to workers.
If an unemployed worker is not eligible to receive UC benefits and the worker’s unemployment
may be directly attributed to a declared major disaster, a worker may be eligible to receive
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA) benefits. The disaster declaration will include
information on whether DUA benefits are available. For information on Disaster Unemployment
Assistance, see CRS Report RS22022, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA), by Julie M.
Whittaker and Alison M. Shelton.
Certain groups of workers who lose their jobs because of international competition may qualify
for additional or supplemental support through Trade Adjustment Act (TAA) programs or (for
certain workers ageaged 50 or older) through Reemployment Trade Adjustment Assistance (RTAA).
This report does not describe the TAA or RTAA programs. (Please see CRS Report RS22718,
1
Montana provides 28 weeks and Massachusetts provides 30 weeks of regular unemployment benefits.
2
Please see CRS Report RS22718,
Trade Adjustment Assistance for Workers (TAA) and Reemployment Trade Adjustment Assistance
(RTAA), by John J. Topoleski, for information on these programs.
1
The other temporary programs became effective in 1958, 1961, 1972, 1975, 1982, 1991, and 2002. For details on
these programs, see CRS Report RL34340, Extending Unemployment Compensation Benefits During Recessions, by
Julie M. Whittaker.
2
For a detailed explanation of the EUC08 program, see CRS Report RS22915, Temporary Extension of Unemployment
Benefits: Emergency Unemployment Compensation (EUC08), by Julie M. Whittaker and Alison M. Shelton.
Congressional Research Service
1
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
Congressional Research Service
1
.
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
Trade Adjustment Assistance for Workers (TAA) and Reemployment Trade Adjustment Assistance
(RTAA), by John J. Topoleski, for information on these programs.)
This report describes four kinds of unemployment benefits: regular UC, EB, EUC08, and DUA.
The report explains their basic eligibility requirements, benefits, and financing structure.
Unemployment Compensation (UC)
UC is a joint federal-state program financed by federal taxes under the Federal Unemployment
Tax Act (FUTA) and by state payroll taxes under the State Unemployment Tax Acts (SUTA). The
UC program has a direct impact on almost every business in the United States as most businesses
are subject to state and federal unemployment taxes. An estimated $7.36.0 billion in federal
unemployment taxes and $32.244.9 billion in state unemployment taxes werewill be collected in FY2008.
Approximately 133.4 million jobs are covered by the UC program. In December 2008, 5.1
million unemployed workers received UC benefits in a given week and the average weekly UC
benefit amount was $297. In FY2008, states spent an estimated $38.1 billion on regular UC
benefits and an additional $4.1 million on EB payments. In FY2008, the federal appropriation for
administration of the UC program was $2.7 billionFY2010.
In FY2010, states will spend an estimated $66.7 billion on regular UC benefits and the state share
of the EB program. The federal government will spend additional amounts described in section
“Appropriation and Outlays” below. Approximately 131.7 million jobs are covered by the UC
program. At the end of the week of April 10, 2010, 5.0 million unemployed workers received UC.
The average weekly UC benefit was $310 in March 2010 (and this amount is supplemented by
the $25 weekly federal additional compensation [FAC] program payment).
Originally, the intent of the UC program, among other things, was to help counter economic
fluctuations such as recessions. 3 This intent is reflected in the current UC program’s funding and
benefit structure. When the economy grows, UC program revenue rises through increased tax
revenues while UC program spending falls as fewer workers are unemployed. The effect of
collecting more taxes than are spent dampens demand in the economy. This also creates a surplus
of funds or a “cushion” of available funds for the UC program to draw upon during a recession.
In a recession, UC tax revenue falls and UC program spending rises as more workers lose their
jobs and receive UC benefits. The increased amount of UC payments to unemployed workers
dampens the economic effect of earnings losses by injecting additional funds into the economy.
Authorization
The underlying framework of the UC system is contained in the Social Security Act (the Act).
Title III of the Act authorizes grants to states for the administration of state UC laws, Title IX
authorizes the various components of the federal Unemployment Trust Fund (UTF), and Title XII
authorizes advances or loans to insolvent state UC programs.
Appropriation and Outlays
The federal government appropriates funds for federal and state UC program administration, the
federal share of EB payments, the EUC08 program, and federal loans to insolvent state UC
programs. In FY2008, the FY2009, states received an estimated $2.73$4.32 billion from the federal government
for the
administration of their UC programs and $4.1 million, $4.12 billion for the federal share of EB
payments.
payments, and
$32.66 billion for the temporary, federally financed EUC08 program. In FY2010, a preliminary
3
See, for example, President Franklin Roosevelt’s remarks at the signing of the Social Security Act at
http://www.ssa.gov/history/fdrstmts.html#signing.
Congressional Research Service
2
.
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
estimate (which did not include the extension of EUC08 and 100% federal financing of the EB
program after February 2010) is that the states will receive an estimated $5.87 billion from the
federal government for the administration of their UC programs, $10.5 billion for the federal
share of EB payments, and $43.57 billion for the temporary EUC08 program.
Administration
The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) administers the federal portion of the UC system, which
operates in each state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands. Federal law
sets broad rules that the 53 state programs must follow. These include the broad categories of
workers that must be covered by the program, the method for triggering the EB and EUC08
programs, the floor on the highest state unemployment tax rate to be imposed on employers
(5.4%), and how the states will repay UTF loans. If the states do not follow these rules, their
employers may lose a portion of their state unemployment tax credit when their federal income
tax is calculated. The federal tax pays for both federal and state administrative costs, the federal
share of the EB program, the EUC08 program, loans to insolvent state UC accounts, and state
employment services. The 2009 stimulus package providesprovided a total of $500 million in additional
funds to states to help with administrative costs of the regular UC program, the EB program, and
the EUC08 program.
UC EligibilityEligibility for Regular Unemployment Compensation
Broad Federal Guidelines Result in Different State Requirements
Whereas federal laws and regulations provide broad guidelines on UC benefit coverage,
eligibility, and benefit determination, the specifics of regular UC benefits are determined by each
state. This results in essentially 53 different programs. States determine UC benefit eligibility,
payments, and duration through state laws and program regulations. Generally, UC eligibility is
based on attaining qualified wages and employment in covered work over a 12-month period
(called a base period) prior to unemployment.
Base Period
The base period is the time period during which wages earned and/or hours/weeks worked are
examined to determine a worker’s monetary entitlement to UC. Almost all states use the first 4 of
four
of the last 5five completed calendar quarters preceding the filing of the claim as their base period. This
This may result in a lag of up to five months between the end of the base period and the date a worker
worker becomes unemployed. As a result there are some instances when workers with substantial labor
labor market attachment are ineligible for UC benefits. In particular, recent entrants to the
workforce,
or re-entrants, may be ineligible under this definition. Federal law allows states to develop
develop expanded definitions of the base period.
Alternative Base Period (ABP)
Several states use an ABP for workers failing to qualify under the regular base period. For
example, if the worker fails to qualify using wages and employment in the first 4 of the last 5
completed calendar quarters, then the state might use wages and employment in the last 4
completed calendar quarters.
Extended Base Period (EBP)
A list of states’ base periods can be found at http://www.workforcesecurity.doleta.gov/unemploy/
pdf/uilawcompar/2010/monetary.pdf, Table 3-2.
Congressional Research Service
3
.
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
Alternative Base Period
Almost two-thirds of states use an alternative base period (ABP) for workers failing to qualify
under the regular base period. For example, if the worker fails to qualify using wages and
employment in the first four of the last five completed calendar quarters, then the state might use
wages and employment in the last four completed calendar quarters.
Extended Base Period
Several states allow workers who have no wages in the current base period to use older wages
and employment under certain conditions. These conditions typically involve illness or injury. For
Congressional Research Service
3
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
example, a worker who was injured on the job and who has collected workers’ compensation
benefits may use wages and employment preceding the date of the worker’s injury to establish
eligibility.
Base Period Provisions in the 2009 Stimulus Package
The 2009 stimulus package (P.L. 111-5) providesprovided up to $7 billion to states as an incentive to make
make changes to their unemployment programs. One As of May 5, 2010, $2.8 billion of this fund had
been distributed to states. One-third of a state’s share of this amount would be
contingent on state
law allowing use of a base period that includes the most recently completed
calendar quarter
before the start of the benefit year for the purpose of determining UC eligibility.
The remaining
two-thirds of a state’s share of the $7 billion would be contingent on qualifying for
the first 1/3onethird payment (by adopting an alternative base period definition), plus adopting two of four
additional provisions (described on page 5in section “2009 Stimulus Provisions Relating to Regular
Unemployment Compensation” below).4
Qualifying Wages or Employment
All states require a worker to have earned a certain amount of wages or to have worked for a
certain period of time (or both) within the base period to be monetarily eligible to receive any UC
benefits. The methods that states use to determine monetary eligibility vary greatly.
Multiple of High-Quarter Wages. Under this method, workers must earn a certain dollar amount
in the quarter with the highest earnings of their base period. Workers must also earn total baseperiod wages that are a multiple—typically 1.5—of the high-quarter wages. For example, if a
worker earns $5,000 in the high quarter, the worker must earn at least another $2,500 in the rest
of the base period. States require earnings in more than one quarter to minimize the likelihood
that workers with high earnings in only one quarter receive benefits. Although the worker might
be monetarily eligible through the earnings accrued in one quarter, these “multiple of high quarter
wages” states do not deem those workers to be substantially attached to the labor market.
Multiple of Weekly Benefit Amount. Under this method, the state first computes the worker’s
weekly benefit amount. The worker must have earned a multiple—often 40—of this amount
4
For more information on unemployment modernization provisions in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
of 2009 (P.L. 111-5), please see CRS Report R40368, Unemployment Insurance Provisions in the American Recovery
and Reinvestment Act of 2009, by Alison M. Shelton and Julie M. Whittaker.
Congressional Research Service
4
.
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
during the base period. For example, if a worker’s weekly benefit amount equals $100, then the
worker will need base period earnings of 40 times $100, or $4,000, before any UC would be paid.
Most states also require wages in at least two quarters. Some states have weighted schedules that
require varying multiples for varying weekly benefits.
Flat Qualifying Amount. States using this method require a certain dollar amount of total wages to
be earned during the base period. This method is used by most states with an annual-wage
requirement for determining the weekly benefit and by some states with a high-quarter
wage/weekly benefit requirement.
Weeks/Hours of Employment. Under this method, the worker must have worked a certain number
of weeks/hours at a certain weekly/hourly wage.
4
For more information on unemployment modernization provisions in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
of 2009, please see P.L. 111-5 CRS Report R40368, Unemployment Insurance Provisions in the American Recovery
and Reinvestment Act of 2009, by Alison M. Shelton, Kathleen Romig, and Julie M. Whittaker.
Congressional Research Service
4
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
2009 Stimulus Provisions Relating to Regular Unemployment Compensation
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (P.L. 111-5, the 2009 stimulus package)
,
as amended, provides for a supplementary benefit payment of $25 per week for unemployment compensation
compensation programs (regular UC, EB, EUC, TAA and DUA) through December 2009. The supplemental
June 2, 2010. The
supplemental $25 weekly benefit will be grandfathered for individuals who have not exhausted regular
compensation as of January 1
benefits as of June 2, 2010, although no supplementary compensation will beis payable
for any week
beginning after June 30October 5, 2010. States will not be allowed to alter the method of
computing computing
unemployment compensation in such a manner that the weekly benefit amount would
be less than
the benefit amount that would have been payable under state law as of December 31,
2008. The
$25 weekly additional benefit will beis financed by the federal government through
general revenues.
The stimulus package also providesprovided up to $7 billion to states as an incentive to make changes to
their unemployment programs. One -third of this amount will be contingent on states allowing use
of a base period that includes the most recently completed calendar quarter before the start of the
benefit year for the purpose of determining UC eligibility. The remaining two -thirds of a state’s
share of the $7 billion will be contingent on the state qualifying for the first 1/3 payment, and
one-third payment,
and state law containing at least two of four additional provisions. These additional provisions
include:
1. making unemployment compensation available to workers seeking part-time
work;
2. making unemployment compensation available to individuals who quit their jobs
voluntarily for compelling family reasons (domestic violence, illness or disability
of an immediate family member, spouse relocating for a new job);
3. providing at least 26 additional weeks of unemployment benefits to workers who
have exhausted all rights to regular benefits but are enrolled and making
satisfactory progress in a state-approved training program or in a job training
program authorized under the Workforce investment Act of 1998; and
4. providing dependents’ allowances to all individuals with a dependent at a level
equal to at least $15 per dependent per week.
Congressional Research Service
5
.
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
Data Collection Considerations
The wide variation seen in state UC program laws and regulations also exists among the states’
data collections. All states collect information on earnings by quarter for each worker. A handful
of states collect information on the number of weeks worked during the base period. Even fewer
states collect information on the numbers of hours worked during a quarter. As a result, most
states use information on quarters worked, quarterly earnings, and cumulative earnings in
determining eligibility and the amount of benefit.5 It does not appear that any state measures both
hours of work and weeks of work in the base period.
5
In the 2008 Comparison of State Unemployment Insurance Laws the following states used the measure of “weeks” in
determination of eligibility or benefit amount: New Jersey, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. Only Washington appears to use
the number of hours worked in eligibility or benefit determination.
Congressional Research Service
5
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
UC Benefit Determination and DurationDetermination and Duration of Regular Unemployment
Compensation
Generally, benefits are based on wages for covered work over a 12-month period (the “base
period” or “alternative base period,” described above). Most state . Most state
benefit formulas replace half of
a claimant’s average weekly wage up to a weekly maximum. All
states disregard some earnings
during unemployment as an incentive to take short-term or parttimepart-time work while searching for a
permanent position. Generally, the worker’s UIUC payment equals
the difference between the
weekly benefit amount and earnings.
Table 1 lists the minimum and maximum UC benefits for each state. 6 Weekly maximums in
January 20092010 ranged from $230235 (Mississippi) to $628629 (Massachusetts) and, in states that provide
dependents’ allowances, up to $942943 (Massachusetts). In December 2008March 2010, the average weekly
benefit was $297. Benefits benefit
was $310 (and this amount is supplemented by the $25 weekly FAC program payment). Benefits
are available for up to 26 weeks (28 weeks in Montana and 30 weeks
in Massachusetts). The
average regular UC benefit duration in December 20082009 was 15 weeks. 6 In
December 2008, 19 weeks. In April 2010,
approximately 5.10 million unemployed workers received regular state UC benefits in a given
week.
Table 1. State Unemployment Compensation Benefits Amounts, January 20092010
(in dollars)
Minimum
Weekly UC
Weekly
UC Benefit
Amount
Minimum If
Dependents’
Allowancea
Maximum
Weekly UC
Benefit
Amountb
Maximum If
Dependents’
Allowancea Weekly
UC Benefit
Amountb
Alabama
45
Alaska
56
255
Arizona
60
240
Arkansas
77
431
California
40
450
Colorado
25
431
475
Connecticut
15
519
594
128
30
370
Delaware
20
District of
Columbia
50
Florida
32
275
Georgia
44
330
Hawaii
5
545
Idaho
65
Illinois
51
Indiana
50
Iowa
53
442
330
359
362
57
385
534
390
65
361
443
6
The permanent federal-state extended benefits (EB) program offers benefits for an additional 13 to 20 weeks in states
with unemployment rates above certain levels. The temporary, federally-financed EUC08 program offers a first tier of
benefits to all workers for up to an additional 20 weeks, and a second tier of benefits for up to an additional 13 weeks
(for a total of up to 33 weeks of EUC08 benefits) for workers in states with certain economic conditions. The EB and
EUC08 programs are discussed later in this report.
Congressional Research Service
6
Arizona
60
240
Arkansas
79
441
Maximum If
Dependents’
Allowancea
265
128
370
442
5
In the 2010 Comparison of State Unemployment Insurance Laws the following states used the measure of “weeks” in
determination of eligibility or benefit amount: New Jersey, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. Only Washington appears to use
the number of hours worked in eligibility or benefit determination.
6
The temporary, federally financed EUC08 program offers up to 53 additional weeks of unemployment benefits for
workers in states with certain economic conditions. The permanent federal-state EB program offers benefits for an
additional 13 to 20 weeks in states with unemployment rates above certain levels. The EB and EUC08 programs are
discussed later in this report.
Congressional Research Service
6
.
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
Minimum
Weekly UC
Weekly
UC Benefit
Amount
Minimum If
Dependents’
Allowancea
Maximum
Weekly UC
Benefit
Amountb
Kansas
105
423
Kentucky
39
415
Louisiana
10
284
Maine
60
90
344
Maryland
25
65
380
Massachusetts
34
51
628
Michigan
117
147
362
Maximum If
Dependents’
Allowancea
516
942
Minnesota
38
351
Mississippi
30
230
Missouri
35
320
Montana
120
407
Nebraska
30
308
Nevada
16
393
New
Hampshire
32
New Jersey
85
97
584
New Mexico
67
100
359
New York
64
405
North Carolina
42
494
North Dakota
43
406
Ohio
105
372
Oklahoma
16
409
Oregon
113
482
Pennsylvania
35
43
558
566
Rhode Island
68
118
528
660
South Carolina
20
326
South Dakota
28
298
427
Tennessee
30
275
Texas
58
392
Utah
28
444
Vermont
64
425
Virginia
54
378
Washington
129
541
West Virginia
24
424
Wisconsin
54
363
Wyoming
30
415
Congressional Research Service
566
459
503
7
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity Weekly
UC Benefit
Amountb
Maximum If
Dependents’
Allowancea
California
40
450
Colorado
25
443
487
Connecticut
15
537
612
30
Delaware
20
330
District of Columbia
50
359
Florida
32
275
Georgia
44
330
Hawaii
5
559
Idaho
72
334
Illinois
51
Indiana
50
Iowa
56
Kansas
109
436
Kentucky
39
415
Louisiana
10
247
Maine
62
93
356
Maryland
25
65
410
77
385
531
390
67
374
459
534
Massachusetts
33
49
629
Michigan
117
147
362
Minnesota
38
377
Mississippi
30
235
Missouri
35
320
Montana
125
422
Nebraska
30
318
Nevada
16
400
New Hampshire
32
427
New Jersey
87
100
600
New Mexico
71
106.50
426
New York
64
405
North Carolina
43
505
North Dakota
43
431
Ohio
106
375
Oklahoma
16
430
Oregon
115
493
Pennsylvania
35
43
564
572
Rhode Island
68
118
546
682
South Carolina
20
326
South Dakota
28
309
Congressional Research Service
943
585
526
503
7
.
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
Minimum Weekly
UC Benefit
Amount
Minimum If
Dependents’
Allowancea
Maximum Weekly
UC Benefit
Amountb
Tennessee
30
275
Texas
59
406
Utah
29
451
Vermont
64
425
Virginia
54
378
Washington
133
560
West Virginia
24
424
Wisconsin
54
363
Wyoming
31
438
Maximum If
Dependents’
Allowancea
Source: Congressional Research Service (CRS) table compiled from Significant Provisions of State Unemployment
Insurance Laws, January 20092010, U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration, at
http://www.owsworkforcesecurity.doleta.gov/unemploy/content/sigpros/2000-present/January20092010-2019/January2010.pdf.
a.
The figures for minimum and maximum benefits include dependents’ allowances for the maximum number
of dependents.
b.
If a state has dependents’ allowances and only one amount is given, the maximum is the same with or
without the allowance.
UC Benefit Financing: Unemployment Taxes on Employers
UC benefits are financed through employer taxes.7 The federal taxes on employers are under the
authority of the Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA), and the state taxes are under the
authority given by the State Unemployment Tax Acts (SUTA). These taxes are deposited in the
appropriate accounts within the Unemployment Trust Fund (UTF).
Federal Unemployment Tax Act
If a state UC program complies with all federal rules, the net FUTA tax rate for employers is
0.8% (the 6.2% FUTA tax rate less the full 5.4% federal tax credit) on the first $7,000 of each
worker’s earnings. (Most recently, because New York had unpaid loan balances, the New York
employers’ rate was higher for 2004 and 2005.) The 0.8% FUTA tax funds both federal and state
administrative costs as well as the federal share of the EB program, loans to insolvent state UC
accounts, and state employment services. Federal law defines which jobs a state UC program
must cover for the state’s employers to avoid paying the maximum FUTA tax rate (6.2%) on the
first $7,000 of each employee’s annual pay.
The net FUTA tax rate on employers in states with UC programs that are in compliance with all
federal rules is 0.8% on the first $7,000 of each worker’s earnings. The FUTA tax rate for
employers is 6.2% on the first $7,000 of each worker’s earnings, but a 5.4% credit against the
federal FUTA tax is available to employers in states with complying UC programs, bringing the
net FUTA tax down to 0.8%. (In tax year 2009, Michigan employers were required to pay a net
FUTA tax of 1.1% because of outstanding federal loans to their state’s UTF account.) The 0.8%
FUTA tax funds both federal and state administrative costs as well as the federal share of the EB
program, loans to insolvent state UC accounts, and state employment services. Federal law
defines which jobs a state UC program must cover, provides rules concerning state borrowing
from the UTF, and provides broad guidelines concerning benefit eligibility, in order for the state’s
employers to avoid paying the maximum FUTA tax rate (6.2%) on the first $7,000 of each
employee’s annual pay.
7
For a more detailed description of UC financing, see CRS Report RS22077, Unemployment Compensation (UC) and
the Unemployment Trust Fund (UTF): Funding UC Benefits, by Julie M. Whittaker.
Congressional Research Service
8
.
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
Federal law requires that a state must cover jobs in firms that pay at least $1,500 in wages during
any calendar quarter or employ at least one worker in each of 20 weeks in the current or prior
year. The FUTA tax is not paid by government or nonprofit employers, but state programs must
cover government workers and all workers in nonprofits that employ at least four workers in each
of 20 weeks in the current or prior year. (States are reimbursed for expenditures related to federal
workers by the federal government.)
An estimated $7.38
Approximately $6.7 billion in FUTA taxes were collected in FY2008. After the payments to the
state accounts for administrative expenses, the expected net balance in the UTF of the
FY2009. The net balance in the
federal accounts of the UTF (the Employment Security Administration Account, the Extended
Unemployment Compensation
Account (for the EB and EUC08 programs), and the Federal
Unemployment Account (for federal
loans to the states) was $36.0 billion at the end of September 2008.
Expiring Provision: P.L. 110-343. At the end of CY2009, the effective FUTA tax on employers
for each employee will decrease to 0.6% (down from 0.8%) on the first $7,000 of wages.
7
For a more detailed description of UC financing, see CRS Report RS22077, Unemployment Compensation (UC) and
the Unemployment Trust Fund (UTF): Funding UC Benefits, by Julie M. Whittaker and Kathleen Romig.
Congressional Research Service
8
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
ARRA Temporary Changes Federal Financing of Unemployment Benefits
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA, P.L. 111-5) made several
important, albeit temporary, changes to the federal role in financing unemployment benefit
programs. Under ARRA, the federal government will use UTF monies to finance 100% of EB
payments through 2009 (under permanent law EB payments are financed 50% by the federal
government and 50% by states). The federal government will use UTF funds to finance a $500
million transfer to states for administering unemployment programs, and also for the $7 billion in
incentive monies to states for undertaking modernization of their unemployment programs.
ARRA also changes the financing of the EUC08 program, which from its implementation in July
2008 had been financed from the UTF, but starting with enactment of ARRA (on February 17,
2009) will be financed from general revenues of the Treasury through expiration of the EUC08
program on December 26, 2009. States will still finance regular unemployment compensation
(UC) loans to the states) on February 1, 2010, was approximately
$6.0 billion. This figure includes $28 billion in general revenue advances to the UTF as of
February 1, 2010, “incentive monies” for states to modernize their UC programs under the
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA; P.L. 111-5), and is net of payments to
state accounts for administrative expenses and UTF lending to state accounts for the payment of
UC benefits.
Congress first passed a temporary FUTA surtax in 1976, and since 1983 the surtax has been
applied in its current form (0.2% on the first $7,000 of employee wages). P.L. 111-92 extended
the authorization of the FUTA surtax through June 2011.
ARRA Temporary Changes Federal Financing of Unemployment Benefits
ARRA (P.L. 111-5) made several important, albeit temporary, changes to the federal role in
financing unemployment benefit programs. Under ARRA (as amended), the federal government
temporarily uses UTF monies to finance 100% of EB payments through June 2, 2010 (under
permanent law EB payments are financed 50% by the federal government and 50% by states).
The federal government also used UTF funds to finance a $500 million transfer to states for
administering unemployment programs, and uses UTF funds for the $7 billion in incentive
monies to states for undertaking modernization of their unemployment programs. ARRA also
changed the financing of the EUC08 program, which from its implementation in July 2008 had
been financed from the UTF, but starting with enactment of ARRA (on February 17, 2009) has
been financed from general revenues of the Treasury. States continue to finance regular UC
through SUTA revenues.
State Unemployment Tax Acts
States levy their own payroll taxes (SUTA taxes) on employers to fund regular UC benefits and
the state share of the EB program. The state unemployment tax rate on an employer is
“experience rated” in all states, that is, the SUTA rate is based on the amount of UC paid to
former employees. Generally, the more UC benefits paid to its former employees, the higher the
tax rate of the employer, up to a maximum established by state law. The experience rating is
intended to ensure an equitable distribution of UC program taxes among employers and to
encourage a stable workforce. State ceilings on taxable wages in January 20092010 ranged from the
$7,000 FUTA federal ceiling (eight states) to $35,700 (Washington38,900 (Hawaii). The minimum SUTA rates
ranged from 0% (eight states) to 1.84% (Pennsylvania) in January 2009. Maximum SUTA rates
ranged from 5.4% (15 states) to 10.96% (Massachusetts) in January 2009. Approximately $32.2
billion in SUTA taxes were collected in FY2008 ranged
8
Employers who are required to provide unemployment insurance coverage, but who are not required to pay the FUTA
tax, generally reimburse state governments for the benefit payments related to their workers. States are reimbursed for
expenditures related to federal workers by the federal government.
Congressional Research Service
9
.
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
from 0% (11 states) to 1.84% (Pennsylvania) in January 2010. Maximum SUTA rates ranged
from 5.4% (15 states) to 13.16% (Pennsylvania) in January 2010. Approximately $31.1 billion in
SUTA taxes were collected in FY2009.
State UC revenue is deposited in the U.S. Treasury. These deposits are counted as federal revenue
in the budget. State accounts within the UTF are credited for this revenue. The U.S. Treasury
reimburses states from the appropriate UTF state accounts for their benefit payments. These
payments do not require an annual appropriation, but the reimbursements do count as federal
budget outlays.
Table 2. State Unemployment Taxes:
Taxable Wage Base and Rates, January 20092010
Wages Subject
to Tax ($)
Minimum State
Unemployment
Tax (%)a
Maximum State
Unemployment
Tax (%)a
Alabama
8,000
0.44
6.04
Alaska
32,70034,100
1.00
5.40
Arizona
7,000
0.02
5.40
Arkansas
1012,000
0.8090
6.7080
California
7,000
1.50
6.20
Colorado
10,000
0.00
5.40
Connecticut
15,000
1.20
6.10
State
Alabama
Congressional Research Service
9
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
Wages Subject
to Tax ($)
Minimum State
Unemployment
Tax (%)a
Maximum State
Unemployment
Tax (%)a90
6.80
Delaware
10,500
0.10
8.00
DC
9,000
1.5030
6.8060
Florida
7,000
0.1012
5.40
Georgia
8,500
0.03
5.40
Hawaii
13,00038,800
0.00
5.40
Idaho
3233,200
0.2645
5.40
Illinois
12,300
0.80
7.20
Indiana
7,000520
0.60
6.80
Indiana
9,500
1.10
5.60
23,700Iowa
24,500
0.00
8.00
Kansas
8,000
0.00
7.40
Kentucky
8,000
0.60
9.751.00
10.00
Louisiana
7,000700
0.10
6.20
Maine
12,000
0.4244
5.40
Maryland
8,500
0.60
9.00
Massachusetts
14,000
1.26
12.27
Michigan
9,000
0.608,500
0.30
7.50
14,000
1.12
10.96
9,000
0.06
10.30
Minnesota
2627,000
0.56
10.70
Mississippi
7,000
0.70
5.40
Missouri
12,50013,000
0.00
9.1075
Montana
25,100
0.13
6.50
Nebraska
9,000
0.24
5.40
26,600
0.25
5.40
8,000
0.10
6.50
New Jersey
28,900
0.30
5.40
New Mexico
20,900
0.03
5.40
8,500
0.50
8.50
North Carolina
19,300
0.00
6.84
North Dakota
23,700
0.20
9.86
9,000
0.50
9.20
Oklahoma
14,200
0.10
5.50
Oregon
31,300
0.70
5.40
Pennsylvania
8,000
1.84
9.98
Rhode Island
18,000
1.69
8.59
South Carolina
7,000
1.24
6.10
South Dakota
9,500
0.00
8.50
Tennessee
7,000
0.40
10.00
State
Delaware
Iowa
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Nevada
New Hampshire
New York
Ohio
Congressional Research Service
10
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
State
Wages Subject
to Tax ($)
Minimum State
Unemployment
Tax (%)a
Maximum State
Unemployment
Tax (%)a
Texas
9,000
0.22
6.22
Utah
27,800
0.10
9.10
Vermont
8,000
0.80
6.50
Virginia
8,000
0.12
6.22
35,700
0.00
5.40
8,000
1.50
7.50
Wisconsin
12,000
0.05
9.80
Wyoming
21,500
0.27
9.03
Washington
West Virginia26,000
0.00
6.12
State
Congressional Research Service
10
.
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
Wages Subject
to Tax ($)
Minimum State
Unemployment Tax (%)a
Maximum State
Unemployment Tax (%)a
Nebraska
9,000
0.00
5.40
Nevada
27,000
0.25
5.40
New Hampshire
10,000
0.10
6.50
New Jersey
29,700
0.30
5.40
New Mexico
20,800
0.03
5.40
New York
8,500
0.70
8.70
North Carolina
19,700
0.00
6.84
North Dakota
24,700
0.20
9.86
Ohio
9,000
0.30
9.00
Oklahoma
14,900
0.10
5.50
Oregon
32,100
0.90
5.40
Pennsylvania
8,000
1.84
13.16
Rhode Island
19,000
1.69
9.79
South Carolina
7,000
1.14
6.00
South Dakota
10,000
0.00
8.50
Tennessee
9,000
0.50
10.00
Texas
9,000
0.26
6.26
Utah
28,300
0.20
9.20
Vermont
10,000
0.80
6.50
Virginia
8,000
0.18
6.28
Washington
36,800
0.00
5.40
West Virginia
12,000
1.50
7.50
Wisconsin
12,000
0.00
8.50
Wyoming
22,800
0.30
9.10
State
Source: CRS table compiled from Significant Provisions of State Unemployment Insurance Laws, January 20092010, U.S.
Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration, at http://www.owsworkforcesecurity.doleta.gov/
unemploy/content/sigpros/2010-2019/January2010unemploy/
contentsigpros/2000-present/January2009.pdf.
a.
Tax rates apply only to experience-rated employers; states apply different rates to new employers.
Generally, during economic expansions, FUTA and SUTA revenue collections will exceed UC
outlays. During economic recessions, revenues generally will be less than UC outlays. For
example, UTF outlays significantly exceeded trust fund revenue in FY2001-FY2004, and again
starting in FY2008. From . From
FY2005 to FY2007, UC revenue exceeded total UC outlays. Table 3
lists the total revenue and
outlays associated with the UC program from FY2001 through FY2009 FY2010
(estimated).
Congressional Research Service
11
.
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
Table 3. Revenue and Spending Associated With Unemployment Compensation,
FY2001-FY2009FY2010
(in billions of dollars)
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008a
2009a2008
2009
2010a
27.8
27.5
33.2
39.3
41.8
43.0
41.2
4139.4
4437.8
51.3
6.9
6.6
6.5
6.6
6.7
7.1
7.3
7.3
6.22
6.7
6.8
20.8
20.9
26.7
32.7
35.1
35.9
33.7
34.1
38.132.2
31.1
44.5
31
53.8
57.4
40.9
35.0
34.3
34.7
44.2
52.341.7 117.2
27.3
42
42
36.9
31.2
30.2
31.4
38.4
44.71
75.3
84.1
b
0.16
0.32
0.16
0.00
0.20
0.00
b
0.160.02
4.1
17.8
Emergency UC
—
7.9
11
4.1
—
—
—
4.4
5.83.6
32.7
43.6
Federal Additional
Compensation
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
6.5
9.6
Administrative Costs
3.6
3.7
4.1
3.9
3.8
3.9
3.7
3.9
34.3
5.9
UC revenue, total
FUTA tax
State UC taxes
UC outlays, total
Regular benefits
Extended benefits
155.1
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, UI Outlook, January 2001-March 2009February 2010, and updates.
a.
Estimated for 2008 and 2009.
b.
Less than $5 million.
Congressional Research Service
11
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity2010. Estimates assumed authorization for EUC08, EB, 100% federal EB financing, and FAC
expired at the end of February.
b.
Less than $5 million.
Outstanding Loans from the Federal Unemployment Account (FUA)
If a state trust fund account becomes insolvent, a state may borrow federal funds.8 The
Department of Labor9 DOL maintains
a list of all states with loans and includes the loan amounts.9
10 States are charged interest on loans
that are not repaid by the end of the fiscal year in which they
were obtained.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (P.L. 111-5, the 2009 stimulus package)
temporarily waives interest payments, and no interest will accrue, on interest payments that come
due from the time the stimulus package was enacted (February 17, 2009) until December 31,
2010. Although states will not need to pay interest during this period, they must still repay the
principal on the underlying loans. If a state does not pay back loaned funds within the prescribed
amount of time or make good progress as determined by the U.S. Secretary of Labor, the state
unemployment tax credit will be reduced.
Extended Benefit (EB) Program
The Extended Benefit program was established by the Federal-State Extended Unemployment
Compensation Act of 1970 (EUCA), P.L. 91-373 (26 U.S.C. 3304, note). EUCA may extend
receipt of unemployment benefits (extended benefits) at the state level if certain economic
situations exist within the state.
The EB program is triggered when a state’s insured unemployment rate (IUR)10 or total
unemployment rate (TUR)11 reaches certain levels. All states must pay up to 13 weeks of EB if
the IUR for the previous 13 weeks is at least 5% and is 120% of the average of the rates for the
same 13-week period in each of the two previous years. There are two other optional thresholds
that states may choose. (States may chose one, two, or none.) If the state has chosen a given
option, they would provide the following:
•
Option 1: an additional 13 weeks of benefits if the state’s IUR is at least 6%,
regardless of previous years’ averages.
•
Option 2: an additional 13 weeks of benefits if the state’s TUR is at least 6.5%
and is at least 110% of the state’s average TUR for the same 13 weeks in either of
the previous two years; an additional 20 weeks of benefits if the TUR is at least
8
For detailed information on loans to the states within the UTF, see CRS Report RS22954, The Unemployment Trust
Fund (UTF): State Insolvency and Federal Loans to States, by Kathleen Romig and Julie M. Whittaker.
9
See http://www.workforcesecurity.doleta.gov/unemploy/budget.asp#tfloans.
10
The IUR is the ratio of UC claimants divided by individuals in UC-covered jobs. The IUR is substantially different
than the TUR because it excludes several important groups: self-employed workers, unpaid family workers, workers in
certain not-for-profit organizations, and several other, primarily seasonal, categories of workers. In addition to those
unemployed workers whose last jobs were in the excluded employment, the insured unemployed rate excludes the
following: those who have exhausted their UC benefits (even if they receive EB or EUC08 benefits); new entrants or
reentrants to the labor force; disqualified workers whose unemployment is considered to have resulted from their own
actions rather than from economic conditions; and, eligible unemployed persons who do not file for benefits.
11
The TUR is the ratio of unemployed workers to all workers (employed and unemployed) in the labor market. The
TUR is essentially a weekly version of the unemployment rate published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics and based
on data from the BLS’ monthly Current Population Survey.
Congressional Research Service
12
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
8% and is at least 110% of the state’s average TUR for the same 13 weeks in
either of the previous two years.
Each state’s IUR and TUR are determined by the state of residence (agent state) of the
unemployed worker rather than by the state of employment (liable state). EB benefits are not
“grandfathered” when a state triggers “off” the program; that is, EB benefit payments in the state
cease immediately.
EB Triggers May be Reviewed in 2010
The President’s 2010 budget outline suggested the EB program be modified in order to make the
UC system more responsive to changing economic conditions. The current EB triggers have been
criticized for deploying in many states long after a recession has started, for not deploying at all
in some states with high unemployment, and for triggering off too quickly in some states.
Analysts cite several reasons for this: (a) a secular decline in unemployment rates has made the
current triggers irrelevant; (b) the rate and lookback provisions work against each other; and (c)
amendments to the program in the early 1980s changed the IUR calculation in a way that made
EB activation less likely.12
At the same time, analysts and legislators have also questioned the use of emergency extended
programs (such as EUC08) because these temporary programs can be subject to delays related to
the recognition of a recession and legislative activity. As a result, there is interest in modifying the
EB program, and especially the EB triggers, so that the EB program can deliver timely and welltargeted benefits.
Some of the issues concerning the EB trigger include national- versus state-level triggers, use of
the IUR versus the TUR, and the use of lookbacks that compare current unemployment with
conditions one and two years earlier.
The EB trigger is composed of two components, a level and a lookback. (The EUC08 trigger also
consists of these two components). The EB is said to be triggered “on” in a state when both
components have met or exceeded the thresholds. The level component of a trigger is a threshold
rate, such as the IUR or the TUR. The lookback component compares the current period’s level
(rate) to the level in the same period in some reference time such as the previous two years.
A national trigger may seem appropriate since the definition of a recession is that it is national in
scope, and the federal government’s interest in reversing an economic decline is national as well.
On the other hand, recessions have often been primarily regional in impact, with the result that a
national trigger could cause extended benefits to be paid to individuals in states that do not face
unusually weak labor markets. Regional or sub-regional triggers have also been suggested as a
means to improve the targeting of benefits, because labor markets can span state boundaries or be
confined to rural or urban areas within a state (especially where a single industry is involved). It
would be very difficult, however, to define appropriate regional or sub-state boundaries. There is
also concern about data accuracy and availability at regional or sub-state levels. With the EUC08
program, Congress opted for a combination of national- and state-level triggers: EUC08 tier I
12
The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981 redefined the IUR to remove UC exhaustees and EB beneficiaries
from the numerator. The Act also eliminated the national IUR trigger, and raised the states’ trigger to 5%.
Congressional Research Service
13
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
provides benefits to all unemployed workers, and EUC08 tier II provides additional weeks of
benefits to unemployed workers in states that face high unemployment.
The IUR and the TUR have been used as triggers for the EB and EUC08 programs, and each has
merits as well as drawbacks. The calculation of the IUR is the ratio of the number of people
claiming regular UC benefits to the number of insured workers. The IUR is arguably the more
accurate indication of actual demand for EB. The IUR’s numerator can change with noneconomic factors such as state eligibility rules and administrative practices, however, and this in
turn can affect whether the EB triggers on in a particular state. The TUR is defined as the number
of all unemployed individuals divided by the size of the civilian labor force (employed and
unemployed). The TUR represents a larger population because it includes uninsured workers
(such as the self-employed) and because it includes all unemployed workers, including those who
failed to qualify for regular UC benefits or who have exhausted regular UC. Recent studies have
found that whether an IUR or TUR trigger is used, the secular decline in unemployment over the
past several decades means that the current trigger levels are too high.
Lookbacks (e.g. the EB requirement that the IUR requirement be at least 120% of the average of
the rates for the same 13-week period in the each of the previous two years) are useful for
measuring changes in unemployment relative to a baseline, but have also been controversial. The
EB lookback has been criticized for forcing the trigger off too quickly, before the end of a
recession. This can occur, for example, when high unemployment rates reach a—still high—
plateau and the rate change from the reference period falls below 20% (in the case of a lookback
requirement of 120%). Some analysts have proposed that the trigger not include a lookback;
others have suggested that the trigger refer to a fixed point in time at some date before the
declaration of a recession.
The Advisory Council on Unemployment Compensation recommended in 1994 that the EB
program use a state TUR of 6.5%, and that the EB program not use a lookback.
Other potential EB triggers could include the increase in the number of unemployed over a period
such as the previous year; the increase the number of long-term unemployed (unemployed for
over 26 weeks); or changes in the number of UC exhaustees. Although the UC exhaustion rate is
intuitively appealing, potential problems with this trigger include inaccurate data and a built-in
delay of up to 26 weeks until benefit exhaustion that could prevent timely launch of the EB
program.
It would be important in any reform to build in a mechanism for reviewing and updating EB
triggers.
EB Eligibility Requirements Beyond Requirements for Regular UC
The EB program imposes additional federal restrictions on individual eligibility for benefits
beyond the state requirements for regular UC. The EB program requires that a worker make a
“systematic and sustained” work search. Furthermore, the worker may not receive benefits if he
or she refused an offer of “suitable” work, which is defined as “any work within such individual’s
capabilities”. In addition, P.L. 97-35, among other items, amended the EUCA to require that
claimants work at least 20 weeks of full-time insured employment or equivalent in insured wages
during their base period.
Congressional Research Service
14
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
The 2009 stimulus package affects a further requirement for EB eligibility. As the EB program
has operated in the past, a beneficiary had to be within their original “benefit year”13 when the
EB program triggered “on” in their state in order to receive EB benefits. Thus, on the condition
that the state triggered “on” during an individual’s benefit year, he or she could receive EB
benefits during the benefit year, or even after the benefit year expired, i.e. at the time he or she
exhausted regular unemployment compensation or EUC08 benefits even if this occurred after the
expiration of the benefit year. However, if the state’s most recent EB period triggered on after the
individual’s benefit year ended, the beneficiary would not receive EB. As a result, in states that
have recently triggered “on” to EB because of rising unemployment rates, many individuals may
be ineligible for EB benefits. For example, if an individual’s benefit year expired in July 2008,
this person would be ineligible for EB benefits if his or her state triggered “on” for EB in
November 2008.
Under the 2009 stimulus package, however, states have the option of ignoring the benefit year
requirement and instead using EUC08 exhaustion as an eligibility requirement, as long as the
state’s EB period falls between enactment of the stimulus package and December 2009. This has
the effect of allowing more individuals to be eligible for the EB program. In addition, states can
opt to grandfather those who exhaust their EUC08 benefits after December 31, 2009.14
As described below, the EUC08 program contains a “reachback” clause under which EUC08
benefits were made available to individuals who had exhausted regular UC benefits with respect
to a benefit year that expired during or after the week of May 6, 2007. Before the stimulus
package, many individuals who had exhausted EUC08 benefits would have been ineligible for EB
benefits if the state triggered “on” for EB after their benefit year expired. Under the stimulus
package, however, all individuals who have exhausted EUC08 benefits would be eligible for EB
benefits, regardless of the timing of their benefit years.
Methods for Determining 20 Weeks of Full-Time Insured Employment
States use one, two, or three different methods for determining an “equivalent” to 20 weeks of
full-time insured employment. These methods are described in both law (Section 202(a)(5) of the
EUCA) and regulation (20 CFR 615.4(b)). In practice, states that require any of these three
methods for receipt of regular UC benefits and do not allow for exceptions to those requirements
do not need to establish that the worker meets the 20 weeks full-time insured employment.15 The
three methods are listed below.
•
earnings in the base period equal to at least 1.5 times the high-quarter wages; or
13
The benefit year is a one-year period during which a worker may receive benefits based on a previous period of
unemployment. In all states, the beginning date of the benefit year depends on when a worker first files a valid claim,
meaning the worker meets minimal wage and employment requirements.
14
States would once again be responsible for 50% of the cost of new entrants to the EB benefit program after
December 2009, however, as 100% federal financing of the EB plan ends in December, 2009. The federal government
would continue to pay 100% of EB benefits for individuals who were receiving EB during the last week of 2009, for
the duration of their EB receipt.
15
According to the 2008 Comparison of State Unemployment Insurance Laws the following states require at least one
of the “20 weeks” requirements for regular UC benefits: Alabama, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky,
Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee,
and Utah.
Congressional Research Service
15
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
Emergency Unemployment Compensation Program
On June 30, 2008, the President signed the Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2008 (P.L. 110252) into law. Title IV of this act created a new temporary unemployment insurance program, the
EUC08 program. This is the eighth time Congress has created a federal temporary program that
has extended unemployment compensation during an economic slowdown. Until February 16,
9
For detailed information on loans to the states within the UTF, see CRS Report RS22954, The Unemployment Trust
Fund (UTF): State Insolvency and Federal Loans to States, by Julie M. Whittaker.
10
See http://www.workforcesecurity.doleta.gov/unemploy/budget.asp#tfloans.
Congressional Research Service
12
.
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
2009, the EUC08 program was financed with funds within the UTF. However, with the passage of
P.L. 111-5, the EUC08 benefit is now 100% federally funded from general funds within the U.S.
Treasury. State UC agencies will administer the EUC08 benefit along with regular UC benefits.
On November 21, 2008, the President signed P.L. 110-449, the Unemployment Compensation
Extension Act of 2008, into law. P.L. 110-449 expanded the potential duration of the EUC08
benefit from up to 13 weeks of EUC08 to a maximum of 20 weeks. It also created a second tier of
benefits for workers in states with high unemployment of up to a maximum of an additional 13
weeks of tier II EUC08 benefits (for up to a cumulative 33 weeks of EUC08 benefits).
On February 27, 2009, the President signed the 2009 stimulus package, P.L. 111-5, known as the
American Economic Recovery and Reinvestment Act, or ARRA. ARRA authorized the EUC08
program through December 2009. The 2009 stimulus package also contained temporary
provisions for 100% federal financing of the EB program and to create an additional $25 weekly
benefit for those receiving regular UC, EUC08, or EB. EUC08 benefits have been financed from
the EUCA in the UTF. Starting from enactment of the 2009 stimulus package, however, EUC08
benefits are financed from general revenues through the termination of the EUC08 program.
On November 6, 2009, the President signed P.L. 111-92, the Worker, Homeownership, and
Business Assistance Act of 2009, into law. P.L. 111-92 expanded benefits available in the EUC08
program. Tier I benefits continue to be up to 20 weeks in duration and tier II benefits are now 14
weeks in duration (compared with 13 previously) and no longer are dependent on a state’s
unemployment rate. The new tier III benefit provides up to 13 weeks of EUC08 benefits to those
workers in states with an average unemployment rate of 6% or higher. The new tier IV benefit
may provide up to an additional six weeks of benefits if the state unemployment rate is at least
8.5%.11
On December 21, 2009, the President signed P.L. 111-118, the Department of Defense
Appropriations Act of 2010, into law. P.L. 111-118 extended the EUC08 program, 100% federal
financing of the EB program, and the $25 supplemental weekly benefit through February 28,
2010.
On March 2, 2010, the President signed P.L. 111-144, the Temporary Extension Act, which
extends the EUC08 program, 100% federal financing of the EB program, and the $25 weekly
supplemental benefit until April 5, 2010.
On April 15, 2010, the President signed P.L. 111-157, the Continuing Extension Act of 2010 into
law. P.L. 111-157 extends the availability of EUC08, 100% federal financing of EB, and the $25
FAC benefits, until the week ending on or before June 2, 2010.
See Appendix B for a summary of public laws, benefits, effective dates, and financing issues
related to the EUC08 program.
11
For details on the EUC08 program, see CRS Report RS22915, Temporary Extension of Unemployment Benefits:
Emergency Unemployment Compensation (EUC08), by Katelin P. Isaacs, Julie M. Whittaker, and Alison M. Shelton.
Congressional Research Service
13
.
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
Previous Temporary Unemployment Compensation Extensions
Previously, Congress acted seven times—in 1958, 1961, 1971, 1974, 1982, 1991, and 2002—to
establish similar temporary programs of extended UC benefits. These programs extended the
period an individual might claim UC benefits (ranging from an additional 6 to 33 weeks) and had
expiration dates.12 Some extensions took into account state economic conditions; many temporary
programs considered the state’s total TUR or the state’s IUR or both.
EUC08 Benefit Amounts, Tiers and Duration
The amount of the EUC08 benefit is the equivalent of the eligible individual’s weekly regular UC
benefit and includes any applicable dependents’ allowances. The 2009 stimulus package, as
amended, provides a federally financed, supplemental $25 per week benefit for unemployment
compensation, including EUC08 tier I-tier IV benefits.
Tier I
The maximum number of weeks an individual may be eligible for tier I EUC08 benefits is capped
at 20 weeks. Some individuals may be eligible for fewer weeks of the tier I EUC08 benefits if
their regular UC benefit entitlement was less than 26 weeks.
Tier II
Once an individual has exhausted tier I benefits, a second tier of EUC08 benefits may be
available if the individual remains unemployed and satisfies the EUC08 conditions to entitlement.
P.L. 111-92 expanded tier II benefits. They are now 14 weeks in duration (compared with 13
previously) and no longer are dependent on a state’s unemployment rate.
Tier III
The new tier III benefit provides up to 13 weeks of EUC08 benefits to those workers in states
with an average total unemployment rate of 6% or higher or in states with an average insured
unemployment rate of 4% or higher.
Tier IV
The new tier IV benefit may provide up to an additional six weeks of benefits if the state average
total unemployment rate is at least 8.5% or in states with an average insured unemployment rate
of at least of 6%.
12
For more information on these programs, see CRS Report RL34340, Extending Unemployment Compensation
Benefits During Recessions, by Julie M. Whittaker.
Congressional Research Service
14
.
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
Terminates June 2, 2010
All tiers of EUC08 benefits are temporary and will expire on June 2, 2010. Those unemployed
individuals who had qualified for a tier I, II, III, or IV EUC08 benefit by May 29, 2010,13 are
“grandfathered” for their remaining weeks of eligibility for only that specific tier, and would
continue to receive payments for the number of weeks they were deemed eligible. However, there
will be no new entrants into any tier of the EUC08 program after the week that ends on June 2,
2010. In other words, to be eligible for an EUC08 tier 1 benefit, an individual must exhaust his or
her regular UC benefits before or during the week ending May 22,14 so as to enter the first tier of
EUC08 benefits during the week ending June 2, 2010, and be grandfathered for tier 1 benefits
after June 2, 2010.
If an individual is eligible to continue to receive the tier I benefit after May 29, 2010, that
individual would not be entitled to tier II benefits once those tier I benefits were exhausted.
Similarly, if an individual is eligible to continue to receive the tier II benefit after May 29, 2010,
that individual would not be entitled to tier III benefits once those tier II benefits were exhausted.
Likewise, if an individual is eligible to continue to receive the tier III benefit after May 29, 2010,
that individual would not be entitled to tier IV benefits once those tier III benefits were
exhausted. No EUC08 benefits—regardless of tier—are payable for any week after November 6,
2010.
Special Case: Exhausted Tier II EUC08 Benefits Before November 8,
2009
If an individual had exhausted the tier II EUC08 benefit before November 23, 2008, the
individual may be eligible for up to a total of 14 weeks EUC08 benefits. Administratively this
will be two separate entitlements: an individual will potentially be entitled to an additional 1
week of tier II EUC08 benefits and up to 13 weeks of tier III benefits. This is a result of P.L. 11192, which expanded tier II from 13 to 14 weeks and dropped the state unemployment rate
requirement. Once the new full entitlement (of up to a total of 14 weeks) of tier II EUC08
benefits has been completed, the individual will then be considered to have exhausted the newly
expanded tier II EUC08 benefit. The individual may then be eligible for the additional 13 weeks
of tier III benefits. (Thus, generally for individuals who had exhausted EUC08 benefits before
November 8, 2009, the new entitlement for H.R. 3548 will be an additional 14 weeks of EUC08
benefits.)
P.L. 111-92 allows states to temporarily pay tier III benefits before tier II benefits if that will help
the states disburse benefits to individuals faster.
No Retroactive Payments for Special Case
There is no payment for the weeks of unemployment during the period when the individual had
exhausted the earlier EUC08 benefit and November 8, 2009. If that individual continues to be
13
14
May 30, 2010, for New York state.
May 23, 2010, for New York state.
Congressional Research Service
15
.
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
unemployed, the individual may be entitled to additional weeks of EUC benefits for the weeks of
unemployment that occur on or after November 8, 2009.
Tier I EUC08 Eligibility Requirements
First Claimed Regular UC Benefits On or After May 7, 2006
Applicants must have been eligible for regular UC benefits and have exhausted their rights to
regular UC compensation with respect to a benefit year that expired during or after the week of
May 6, 2007.15 For most states, this would apply to individuals who had filed UC claims with an
effective date of May 7, 2006 or later. For the state of New York this would apply to original
claims filed with an effective date of May 1, 2006 or later. 16
Exhausted Regular UC Benefit
The right to regular UC benefits for an individual must be exhausted to be eligible for EUC08
benefits. Although federal laws and regulations provide broad guidelines on regular UC benefit
coverage and eligibility determination, the specifics of regular UC benefits are determined by
each state. As noted earlier, this results in 53 different programs. 17 In particular, states determine
UC benefit eligibility, amount, and duration through state laws and program regulations.18
“20 Weeks” of Full-Time Insured Employment or Equivalent
In addition to all state requirements for regular UC eligibility, the EUC08 program requires
claimants to have at least 20 weeks of full-time insured employment or the equivalent in insured
wages in their base period. The definition of “20 weeks” is discussed in the “Methods for
Determining 20 Weeks of Full-Time Insured Employment” section of this report.
Tier II EUC08 Eligibility Requirements
Exhausted Tier I EUC08 Benefit
The right to tier I EUC08 benefits must be exhausted to be eligible for the tier II EUC08 benefits.
15
Arkansas has a unique approach to calculating a benefit year. In Arkansas, the benefit year begins the first day of the
quarter in which an individual files a valid UC claim. Thus, it is unlikely that many individuals in Arkansas who filed
UC claims before July 2006 would be eligible to receive EUC08 benefits.
16
Note that the effective date is not necessarily the actual date when an individual filed for UC. A claim filed on May
10, 2006, may have had an earlier effective date if a state allows retroactive claims.
17
The 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands provide UC benefits to their workers.
18
Individuals in the Massachusetts and Montana UC programs may have regular UC durations that exceed 26 weeks.
Those additional weeks are not used to calculate EUC08 duration.
Congressional Research Service
16
.
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
Tier III EUC08 Eligibility Requirements
Exhausted Tier II EUC08 Benefit
The right to tier II EUC08 benefits must be exhausted to be eligible for the tier III EUC08
benefits. States have the ability to waive this requirement and pay tier III before tier II if doing so
would aid in prompt payment of EUC08 benefits.
At or After the Period of Tier II EUC08 Exhaustion, the State Must Currently
Have At Least 6% Unemployment Rate
The individual must have worked in a state with unemployment currently of at least 6% or an
IUR of at least 4%. If the state’s unemployment rate meets one of these conditions, a (still)
unemployed tier II benefit exhaustee would be eligible for tier III benefits at that time.
Each Monday the Department of Labor issues its “Emergency Unemployment Compensation
Trigger Notice” at http://www.workforcesecurity.doleta.gov/unemploy/claims_arch.asp. If the
status column for tier III within the notice is “on” for a particular state’s row, that state is
considered to be high unemployment for the purposes of EUC08 tier III benefits.
No Retroactive Payments
No retroactive EUC08 payments exist for the period during which the individual had exhausted
tier II benefits but the state did not meet the high unemployment criteria. However, once a state
reaches the 6.0% level, a still unemployed tier II exhaustee would be able to receive tier III
benefits.
Tier IV EUC08 Eligibility Requirements
Exhausted Tier I, Tier II, and Tier III EUC08 Benefits
The right to tier I, tier II, and tier III EUC08 benefits must be exhausted to be eligible for the tier
IV EUC08 benefits.
At or After the Period of Tier III EUC08 Exhaustion, the State Must Currently
Have At Least 8.5% Unemployment Rate
The individual must have worked in a state with unemployment currently of at least 8.5% or an
IUR of at least 5%. If the state’s unemployment rate meets one of these conditions, a (still)
unemployed tier III benefit exhaustee would be eligible for tier IV benefits at that time.
Each Monday the Department of Labor issues its “Emergency Unemployment Compensation
Trigger Notice” at http://www.workforcesecurity.doleta.gov/unemploy/claims_arch.asp. If the
status column for tier IV benefits within the notice is “on” for a particular state’s row, that state is
considered to be high unemployment for the purposes of EUC08.
Congressional Research Service
17
.
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
No Retroactive Payments
No retroactive EUC08 payments exist for the period during which the individual had exhausted
tier IV benefits but the state did not meet the tier IV high unemployment criteria. However, once a
state reaches the 8.5% level, a still unemployed tier III exhaustee would be able to receive
benefits.
EUC08 Financing
Until February 16, 2009, the EUC08 program was federally financed from the extended
unemployment compensation account (EUCA) within the Unemployment Trust Fund (UTF).
With the passage of the 2009 stimulus package (P.L. 111-5), however, EUC08 is now financed
from general funds of the U.S. Treasury through the expiration of the EUC08 program. States do
not need to repay these funds.
EUC08 and EB Interactions
The EUC08 program should not be confused with the similarly named EB program (see
description below). The EUC08 program is temporary and tiers 1 and 2 of EUC08 apply to all
states while tier III and IV of EUC08 apply to states with high and very high unemployment,
respectively. The EB program is permanently authorized and applies only to certain states on the
basis of state unemployment conditions specified in law.
The EUC08 program allows states to determine which benefit, EB or EUC08, is paid first. Most
states have opted to pay EUC08 benefits before EB. Alaska has opted to pay EB before EUC08
benefits.
An exception to the payment order may be made if an individual claimed EB for at least one
week of unemployment after exhausting the first two tiers of EUC08 and prior to the enactment
P.L. 111-92, which created new EUC08 tiers III and IV. P.L. 111-92 gives states the option of
paying EB to an otherwise eligible individual prior to the payment of any EUC08 benefits that are
payable on account of the Worker Assistance Act amendments to the EUC08 program (or vice
versa in the case of Alaska).
Extended Benefit Program
The EB program was established by the Federal-State Extended Unemployment Compensation
Act of 1970 (EUCA), P.L. 91-373 (26 U.S.C. 3304, note). EUCA may extend receipt of
unemployment benefits (extended benefits) at the state level if certain economic situations exist
within the state.
The EB program is triggered when a state’s IUR19 or TUR20 reaches certain levels. All states must
pay up to 13 weeks of EB if the IUR for the previous 13 weeks is at least 5% and is 120% of the
19
The IUR is the ratio of UC claimants divided by individuals in UC-covered jobs. The IUR is substantially different
than the TUR because it excludes several important groups: self-employed workers, unpaid family workers, workers in
certain not-for-profit organizations, and several other, primarily seasonal, categories of workers. In addition to those
(continued...)
Congressional Research Service
18
.
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
average of the rates for the same 13-week period in each of the two previous years. There are two
other optional thresholds that states may choose. (States may choose one, two, or none.) If the
state has chosen a given option, they would provide the following:
•
Option 1: an additional 13 weeks of benefits if the state’s IUR is at least 6%,
regardless of previous years’ averages.
•
Option 2: an additional 13 weeks of benefits if the state’s TUR is at least 6.5%
and is at least 110% of the state’s average TUR for the same 13 weeks in either of
the previous two years; an additional 20 weeks of benefits if the TUR is at least
8% and is at least 110% of the state’s average TUR for the same 13 weeks in
either of the previous two years.
Each state’s IUR and TUR are determined by the state of residence (agent state) of the
unemployed worker rather than by the state of employment (liable state). EB benefits are not
“grandfathered” when a state triggers “off” the program; that is, EB benefit payments in the state
cease immediately.
EB Triggers May be Reviewed in 2010
The President’s 2010 budget outline suggested the EB program be modified to make the UC
system more responsive to changing economic conditions. The current EB triggers have been
criticized for deploying in many states long after a recession has started, for not deploying at all
in some states with high unemployment, and for triggering off too quickly in some states.
Analysts cite several reasons for this: (1) the general long-term decline in unemployment rates
has made the current triggers irrelevant; (2) the rate and lookback provisions work against each
other; and (3) amendments to the program in the early 1980s changed the IUR calculation in a
way that made EB activation less likely. 21
At the same time, analysts and legislators have also questioned the use of emergency extended
programs (such as EUC08) because these temporary programs can be subject to delays related to
the recognition of a recession and legislative activity. As a result, there is interest in modifying the
EB program, and especially the EB triggers, so that the EB program can deliver timely and welltargeted benefits.
Some of the issues concerning the EB trigger include national- versus state-level triggers, use of
the IUR versus the TUR, and the use of lookbacks that compare current unemployment with
conditions one and two years earlier.
(...continued)
unemployed workers whose last jobs were in the excluded employment, the insured unemployed rate excludes the
following: those who have exhausted their UC benefits (even if they receive EB or EUC08 benefits); new entrants or
reentrants to the labor force; disqualified workers whose unemployment is considered to have resulted from their own
actions rather than from economic conditions; and, eligible unemployed persons who do not file for benefits.
20
The TUR is the ratio of unemployed workers to all workers (employed and unemployed) in the labor market. The
TUR is essentially a weekly version of the unemployment rate published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics and based
on data from the BLS’ monthly Current Population Survey.
21
The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981 redefined the IUR to remove UC exhaustees and EB beneficiaries
from the numerator. The Act also eliminated the national IUR trigger, and raised the states’ trigger to 5%.
Congressional Research Service
19
.
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
The EB trigger is composed of two components, a level and a lookback. The EB is said to be
triggered “on” in a state when both components have met or exceeded the thresholds. The level
component of a trigger is a threshold rate, such as the IUR or the TUR. The lookback component
compares the current period’s level (rate) to the level in the same period in some reference time
such as the previous two years.
A national trigger may seem appropriate because the definition of a recession is that it is national
in scope, and the federal government’s interest in reversing an economic decline is national as
well. On the other hand, recessions have variations in its regional impact. A national trigger could
cause extended benefits to be paid to individuals in states that do not face unusually weak labor
markets. Regional or sub-regional triggers have also been suggested as a means to improve the
targeting of benefits, because labor markets can span state boundaries or be confined to rural or
urban areas within a state (especially where a single industry is involved). It would be very
difficult, however, to define appropriate regional or sub-state boundaries. There is also concern
about data accuracy and availability at regional or sub-state levels. With the EUC08 program,
Congress opted for a combination of national- and state-level triggers: EUC08 tiers I and II
provide benefits to all unemployed workers, and EUC08 tiers III and IV provide additional weeks
of benefits to unemployed workers in states that face high unemployment.
The IUR and the TUR have been used as triggers for the EB and EUC08 programs, and each has
merits as well as drawbacks. The calculation of the IUR is the ratio of the number of people
claiming regular UC benefits to the number of insured workers. The IUR is arguably the more
accurate indication of actual demand for EB. The IUR’s numerator can change with noneconomic factors such as state eligibility rules and administrative practices, however, and this in
turn can affect whether the EB is activated in a particular state. The TUR is defined as the number
of all unemployed individuals divided by the size of the civilian labor force (employed and
unemployed). The TUR represents a larger population because it includes uninsured workers
(such as the self-employed) and because it includes all unemployed workers, including those who
failed to qualify for regular UC benefits or who have exhausted regular UC. Recent studies have
suggested that whether an IUR or TUR trigger is used, the secular decline in unemployment over
the past several decades has resulted in the current trigger levels being relatively difficult to
attain.
Lookbacks (e.g., the base EB requirement that the IUR requirement be at least 120% of the
average of the rates for the same 13-week period in the each of the previous two years) are useful
for measuring changes in unemployment relative to a baseline, but have also been controversial.
The EB lookback has been criticized for forcing the trigger off too quickly, before the end of a
recession. This can occur, for example, when high unemployment rates reach a—still high—
plateau and the rate change from the reference period falls below 20% (in the case of a lookback
requirement of 120%). Some have proposed that the trigger not include a lookback; others have
suggested that the trigger refer to a fixed point in time at some date before the declaration of a
recession.
The Advisory Council on Unemployment Compensation recommended in 1994 that the EB
program use a state TUR of 6.5%, and that the EB program not use a lookback.
Other potential EB triggers could include the increase in the number of unemployed over a period
such as the previous year; the increase in the number of long-term unemployed (unemployed for
over 26 weeks); or changes in the number of UC exhaustees. Although the UC exhaustion rate is
Congressional Research Service
20
.
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
intuitively appealing, a potential problem with this trigger includes a built-in delay of up to 26
weeks until benefit exhaustion that could prevent timely launch of the EB program.
It would be important in any reform to build in a mechanism for reviewing and updating EB
triggers.
EB Eligibility Requirements Beyond Requirements for Regular UC
The EB program imposes additional federal restrictions on individual eligibility for benefits
beyond the state requirements for regular UC. The EB program requires that a worker make a
“systematic and sustained” work search. Furthermore, the worker may not receive benefits if he
or she refused an offer of “suitable” work, which is defined as “any work within such individual’s
capabilities”. In addition, P.L. 97-35, among other items, amended the EUCA to require that
claimants work at least 20 weeks of full-time insured employment or equivalent in insured wages
during their base period.
The 2009 stimulus package affects a further requirement for EB eligibility. As the EB program
has operated in the past, a beneficiary had to be within their original “benefit year”22 when the
EB program triggered “on” in their state in order to receive EB benefits. Thus, on the condition
that the state triggered “on” during an individual’s benefit year, he or she could receive EB
benefits during the benefit year, or even after the benefit year expired, that is, at the time he or she
exhausted regular unemployment compensation or EUC08 benefits even if this occurred after the
expiration of the benefit year. However, if the state’s most recent EB period triggered on after the
individual’s benefit year ended, the beneficiary would not receive EB. As a result, in states that
have recently triggered “on” to EB because of rising unemployment rates, many individuals may
be ineligible for EB benefits. For example, if an individual’s benefit year expired in July 2008,
this person would be ineligible for EB benefits if his or her state triggered “on” for EB in
November 2008.
Under the 2009 stimulus package (as amended), states have the option of ignoring the benefit
year requirement and instead using EUC08 exhaustion as an eligibility requirement, as long as the
state’s EB period falls between enactment of the stimulus package and June 2, 2010. This has the
effect of allowing more individuals to be eligible for the EB program. In addition, states can opt
to grandfather those who exhaust their EUC08 benefits after the EUC08 program expires.23
As described above, the EUC08 program contains a “reachback” clause under which EUC08
benefits were made available to individuals who had exhausted regular UC benefits with respect
to a benefit year that expired during or after the week of May 6, 2007. Before the stimulus
package, many individuals who had exhausted EUC08 benefits would have been ineligible for EB
benefits if the state triggered “on” for EB after their benefit year expired. Under the stimulus
22
The benefit year is a one-year period during which a worker may receive benefits based on a previous period of
unemployment. In all states, the beginning date of the benefit year depends on when a worker first files a valid claim,
meaning the worker meets minimal wage and employment requirements.
23
States would once again be responsible for 50% of the cost of new entrants to the EB benefit program after June 2,
2010, however, as 100% federal financing of the EB plan ends. The federal government would continue to pay 100% of
EB benefits for individuals who were receiving EB during the week ending before June 2, 2010, for the duration of
their EB receipt.
Congressional Research Service
21
.
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
package, however, all individuals who have exhausted EUC08 benefits would be eligible for EB
benefits, regardless of the timing of their benefit years.
Methods for Determining 20 Weeks of Full-Time Insured Employment
States use one, two, or three different methods for determining an “equivalent” to 20 weeks of
full-time insured employment. These methods are described in both law (Section 202(a)(5) of the
EUCA) and regulation (20 CFR 615.4(b)). In practice, states that require any of these three
methods for receipt of regular UC benefits and do not allow for exceptions to those requirements
do not need to establish that the worker meets the 20 weeks full-time insured employment. The
three methods are listed below:
•
earnings in the base period equal to at least 1.5 times the high-quarter wages; or
•
earnings in the base period of at least 40 times the most recent weekly benefit
amount, and if this alternative is adopted, it shall use the weekly benefit amount
(including dependents’ allowances) payable for a week of total unemployment
(before any reduction because of earnings, pensions or other requirements) that
applied to the most recent week of regular benefits; or
•
earnings in the base period equal to at least 20 weeks of full-time insured
employment, and if this alternative is adopted, the term “full-time” shall have the
meaning provided by the state law.
The base period may be the regular base period or, if applicable in the state, the period may be the
alternative base period or the extended base period if that determined the regular UC benefit.
The underlying reasoning behind the requirements seems to be the following:
•
Because there are 13 weeks in a quarter, 1.5 times the high-quarter wage is
roughly equivalent to 1.5 times 13 weeks of wages or about 20 weeks of wages.
(Many states require high quarterly earnings of under $2,000, which works out to
less than $4/hour under full-time assumptions. This is less than the federal
minimum wage of $5.85/hour.)
•
Similarly, because the weekly benefit amount is roughly equivalent to half the
average weekly wage, 40 times the weekly benefit amount is roughly equivalent
to 20 weeks of wages.
2009 Stimulus Provisions Affecting EB Level and Duration
The EB program provides for additional weeks of UC benefits,. As described earlier, all states
must pay up to a maximum of 13 weeks
during periods of high unemployment, and certain states
that have chosen additional, optional triggers may pay and up to a maximum of 20 weeks in certain states with
during
periods of extremely high unemployment. The 2009 stimulus package provides a (as amended) provided a
supplemental $25 weekly
benefit through 2009June 2, 2010, for recipients of unemployment
compensation, including EB recipients.
EB benefits on interstate claims are limited to two extra weeks unless both the agent state (e.g.,
Texas) and liable state (e.g., Louisiana) are both in an EB period.
Congressional Research Service
22
.
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
2009 Stimulus Provisions Affecting EB Financing
Under permanent law, EB benefits are funded half (50%) by the federal government through its
account for that purpose
in the UTF. States fund the other half (50%) through their state accounts
in the UTF. The federal
government pays 100% of EB administrative costs.
The 2009 stimulus package, as amended, temporarily changes the federal-state funding
arrangement. The
federal government would financefinances 100% of EB benefits through the end of 2009, through the
Extended Unemployment Compensation Account (EUCA) of the Unemployment Trust Fund
(UTF)June 2, 2010,
through the EUCA of the UTF, with the exception of former state and local employees’ EB benefits. As a result, some states may
be reluctant to adopt
benefits. 100% federal financing of the EB program has prompted some states to adopt the
optional triggers to provide 20 weeks of extended benefits. The exception for former state and
local employees’ EB benefits, however, has made some states reluctant to adopt the optional 20week EB triggers, or the stimulus provision that allows them to use EUC08 exhaustion rather than
than benefit year as a requirement for EB eligibility. For individuals who were receiving EB payments
payments during the last week of 2009week ending June 2, 2010, the federal government wouldwill continue to pay 100% of EB benefits
Congressional Research Service
16
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
100% of EB benefits for the duration of these individuals’ benefits (but not for new entrants to the
EB program starting
in January, 2010 after that date). The stimulus package also continues the temporary
suspension of the waiting
week requirement for federal funding until the week ending before May 30, 2010.16
Emergency Unemployment Compensation
(EUC08) Program
The Emergency Unemployment Compensation (EUC08) program was created by P.L. 110-252 on
June 30, 2008. This temporary unemployment insurance program initially provided up to 13
additional weeks of unemployment benefits to workers who had exhausted regular UC benefits.
On November 21, 2008, the President signed P.L. 110-449 into law, extending the EUC08
program through March 2009, and increasing the duration of EUC08 benefits from the original
maximum of 13 weeks to a maximum of 20 weeks (referred to as EUC08 tier I benefits). P.L.
110-499 also created a second tier of EUC08 benefits that provides up to 13 additional weeks of
unemployment benefits to workers in states with a total unemployment rate of at least 6% (or an
IUR of at least 4%). The two tiers of EUC08 benefits provide up to a cumulative 33 weeks of
EUC08 benefits. ARRA extends the termination date of the EUC08 program through December
26, 2009.17
EUC08 benefits have been financed from the Extended Unemployment Compensation Account
(EUCA) in the Unemployment Trust fund. Starting from enactment of the 2009 stimulus package,
however, EUC08 benefits will be financed from general revenues through the termination of the
EUC08 program in December 2009.
Previous Temporary Unemployment Compensation Extensions
Previously, Congress acted seven times—in 1958, 1961, 1971, 1974, 1982, 1991, and 2002—to
establish similar temporary programs of extended UC benefits. These programs extended the
period an individual might claim UC benefits (ranging from an additional 6 to 33 weeks) and had
expiration dates.18 Some extensions took into account state economic conditions; many temporary
programs considered the state’s total TUR or the state’s IUR or both.
EUC08 Benefits Tiers and Duration
The amount of the EUC08 benefit is the equivalent of the eligible individual’s weekly regular UC
benefit and includes any applicable dependents’ allowances. The 2009 stimulus package provides
a federally-financed, supplemental $25 per week benefit for unemployment compensation,
including EUC08 tier 1 and tier 2 benefits, through December, 2009.
16
States that do not require a one-week UC waiting period, or have an exception for any reason to the waiting period,
pay 100% of the first week of EB. Twenty-five states, including Rhode Island and North Carolina, do not require a oneweek UC waiting period in all cases. P.L. 110-449 suspended this requirement until December 2009.
17
For details on the EUC08 program, see CRS Report RS22915, Temporary Extension of Unemployment Benefits:
Emergency Unemployment Compensation (EUC08), by Julie M. Whittaker and Alison M. Shelton.
18
For more information on these programs, see CRS Report RL34340, Extending Unemployment Compensation
Benefits During Recessions, by Julie M. Whittaker.
Congressional Research Service
17
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
Tier I
The maximum number of weeks an individual may be eligible for tier I EUC08 benefits is capped
at 20 weeks. Some individuals may be eligible for fewer weeks of the tier I EUC08 benefits if
their regular UC benefit entitlement was less than 26 weeks.
Tier II
Once an individual has exhausted tier I benefits, a second tier of EUC08 benefits may be
available if the individual worked in a state with high unemployment (a TUR of at least 6% or an
IUR of at least 4%). The maximum number of weeks of tier II benefits is capped at 13 additional
weeks (for a maximum of 33 weeks of EUC08 benefits).
Began July 6, 2008
States were required to enter into an agreement with the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) to
provide the EUC08 benefit to unemployed individuals in the state. Once the agreement was
signed, the EUC08 benefit began the following week.
All states have signed agreements with DOL, and EUC08 benefits are now available beginning
for weeks of qualifying unemployment on or after July 6, 2008. EUC08 benefits for that first
week began to be disbursed the week of July 13, 2008.
Terminates December 26, 2009
Both tiers of EUC08 benefits are temporary and expire on December 26, 2009.19 Those
beneficiaries receiving tier I or tier II EUC08 benefits before December 26, 2009, are
“grandfathered” for their remaining weeks of eligibility. There are no new entrants into either the
tier I or tier II EUC08 program after December 26, 2009. That is, if an individual exhausts his or
her regular unemployment compensation (UC) benefits (or EB benefits in a few states) after
December 26, 2009, the individual would not be eligible for any EUC08 benefit. If eligible to
continue to receive the tier I benefit after December 26, 2009, an individual would not be entitled
to tier II benefits once those benefits were exhausted. Neither tier I nor tier II EUC08 benefits are
payable for any week after June 6, 2010.20
Tier I EUC08 Eligibility Requirements
First Claimed Regular UC Benefits On or After May 7, 2006
Applicants must have been eligible for regular UC benefits and have exhausted their rights to
regular UC compensation with respect to a benefit year that expired during or after the week of
May 6, 2007.21 For most states, this would apply to individuals who had filed UC claims with an
19
December 27, 2009 for New York state.
June 7, 2010 for New York state.
21
Arkansas has a unique approach to calculating a benefit year. In Arkansas, the benefit year begins the first day of the
quarter in which an individual files a valid UC claim. Thus, it is unlikely that many individuals in Arkansas who filed
(continued...)
20
Congressional Research Service
18
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
effective date of May 7, 2006, or later. For the state of New York this would apply to original
claims filed with an effective date of May 1, 2006, or later.22
Exhausted Regular UC Benefit
The right to regular UC benefits for an individual must be exhausted to be eligible for EUC08
benefits. Although federal laws and regulations provide broad guidelines on regular UC benefit
coverage and eligibility determination, the specifics of regular UC benefits are determined by
each state. As noted earlier, this results in 53 different programs. 23 In particular, states determine
UC benefit eligibility, amount, and duration through state laws and program regulations.24
“20 Weeks” of Full-Time Insured Employment or Equivalent
In addition to all state requirements for regular UC eligibility, the EUC08 program requires
claimants to have at least 20 weeks of full-time insured employment or the equivalent in insured
wages in their base period. The definition of “20 weeks” is discussed in the Extended Benefit
(EB) Program section of this report.
Eligibility Special Case: Exhausted EUC08 Benefits Before November 23, 2008
If an individual had exhausted the EUC08 benefit before November 23, 2008, it is likely that the
enactment of P.L. 110-449 would result in additional weeks of EUC08 benefits for this person.
P.L. 110-449 extended the duration of EUC08 benefits to 20 weeks, from 13 weeks in the original
law. Once the new full entitlement (of up to a total of 20 weeks) of tier I EUC08 benefits has been
completed, the individual will then be considered to have exhausted the newly expanded tier I
EUC08 benefit. There is no payment for the weeks of unemployment during the period when the
individual had exhausted the earlier EUC08 benefit and November 23, 2008.
Tier II EUC08 Eligibility Requirements
Exhausted Tier I EUC08 Benefit
Tier I EUC08 benefits must be exhausted as a condition of eligibility for the tier II EUC08
benefits.
(...continued)
UC claims before July 2006 would be eligible to receive EUC08 benefits.
22
Note that the effective date is not necessarily the actual date when an individual filed for UC. A claim filed on May
10, 2006, may have had an earlier effective date if a state allows retroactive claims.
23
The 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands provide UC benefits to their workers.
24
Individuals in the Massachusetts and Montana UC programs may have regular UC durations that exceed 26 weeks.
Those additional weeks are not used to calculate EUC08 duration.
Congressional Research Service
19
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
At or After the Period of Tier I EUC08 Exhaustion, the State Must Currently
Have High Unemployment
The individual must have worked in a state currently considered to have high unemployment
(TUR of at least 6% or IUR of at least 4%) for the purposes of the EUC08 program. If at the time
of tier I exhaustion the state does not meet the TUR or IUR thresholds, the individual would not
be eligible for tier II benefits. However, tier II benefits do not need to be continuous with tier I
benefits. Thus, if the state later has a TUR of at least 6% or IUR of at least 4%, a still unemployed
tier I benefit exhaustee would be eligible for tier II benefits at that later time.
Each Monday the Department of Labor issues its “Emergency Unemployment Compensation
Trigger Notice” at http://atlas.doleta.gov/unemploy/claims_arch.asp. If the status column within
the notice is “on” for a particular state’s row, that state is considered to be high unemployment for
the purposes of EUC08.
No retroactive tier II payments exist for the period during which the individual had exhausted tier
I benefits but the state did not meet the high unemployment criteria.
EUC08 Financing
Until February 16, 2009, the EUC08 program was federally financed from the extended
unemployment compensation account (EUCA) within the Unemployment Trust Fund (UTF).
With the passage of the 2009 stimulus package (P.L. 111-5), however, EUC08 is now financed
from general funds of the U.S. Treasury through the expiration of the EUC08 program in
December 2009. States do not need to repay these funds.
EUC08 and EB Interactions
The EUC08 program should not be confused with the similarly named EB program. The EUC08
program is temporary and tier 1 of EUC08 applies to all states while tier II of EUC08 applies to
states with high unemployment. The EB program is permanently authorized and applies only to
certain states on the basis of state unemployment conditions specified in law.
The EUC08 program allows states to determine which benefit is paid first. Thus, states may
choose to pay EUC08 before EB or vice versa. States balance the decision of which benefit to pay
first by comparing the potential cost savings to the state to the potential loss of unemployment
benefits for unemployed individuals in the state. 25 Because EB benefits are conditioned on high
unemployment in the state but the first tier of EUC08 is not, if the state opts to pay EUC08 first,
individuals in the state might receive less in total unemployment benefits if the EB program
triggers off before the individuals exhaust their EUC08 benefits.
Most states have opted to pay EUC08 benefits before EB. Alaska has opted to pay EB before
EUC08 benefits.
25
The EUC08 program is 100% federally financed for the duration of the program. For the EB program, 100% federal
financing is available for 2009 only. Thus in 2008, and again in 2010, it may be less costly for the state to choose to
offer the EUC08 benefit first. Also, some recipients may find jobs before becoming eligible for EB. In addition, the
state may trigger off of the EB program before some recipients exhaust EUC.
Congressional Research Service
20
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA)26
DUA benefits were created in 1970 by the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency
Relief Act (the Stafford Act, P.L. 91-606). The Stafford Act authorizes the President to issue a
major disaster declaration after state and local government resources have been overwhelmed by
a natural catastrophe or “regardless of cause, any fire, flood, or explosion in any part of the
United States” (42 U.S.C. 5122(2)). On the basis of the request of the affected state’s governor,
the President may declare that a major disaster exists.
The declaration identifies the areas in the state eligible for assistance. The declaration of a major
disaster provides the full range of disaster assistance available under the Stafford Act, including,
but not limited to, the repair, replacement, or reconstruction of public and nonprofit facilities;
cash grants for the personal needs of victims; housing; and unemployment assistance related to
job loss from the disaster.
DUA Eligibility
DUA benefits are available to individuals who have become unemployed as a direct result of a
declared major disaster. Workers who do not qualify for UC benefits may be eligible for DUA
benefits for 26 weeks. Also, if a worker qualified for fewer than 26 weeks of UC benefits, the
worker may qualify for DUA benefits for the remaining weeks if the worker is unemployed for
reasons directly attributable to the disaster. A worker may not receive DUA and UC benefits at the
same time.
The DUA regulation defines eligible unemployed workers to include:
•
the self-employed;
•
workers who experience a “week of unemployment” following the date the major
disaster began, when such unemployment is a direct result of the major disaster;
•
workers unable to reach the place of employment as a direct result of the major
disaster and workers who were to begin employment and who do not have a job
or are unable to reach the job as a direct result of the major disaster;
•
individuals who have become the breadwinner or major support for a household
because the head of the household has died as a direct result of the major
disaster; and
•
workers who cannot work because of injuries caused as a direct result of the
disaster.
DUA Benefit Determination and Duration
When a reasonable comparative earnings history can be constructed, DUA benefits are
determined in a similar manner to regular state UC benefit rules. For example, self-employed
persons would be expected to bring in their tax records to prove a level of earnings for the
26
See CRS Report RS22022, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA), by Julie M. Whittaker and Alison M. Shelton.
Congressional Research Service
21
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
previous two years. These records would take the place of the employer-reported wage data that
are used in UC benefit determination. Likewise, workers who would otherwise be eligible for UC
benefits except for injuries directly resulting from the disaster that make them unavailable for
work would receive DUA benefits in an amount equivalent to what they would have received
under the UC system if they were not injured and available to work. In all cases, workers will
receive a DUA benefit that is at least half of the average UC benefit for that state and cannot
receive more than the maximum UC benefit available in that state.
The 2009 stimulus package provides for an additional $25 per week benefit through December
2009 that is federally funded and is available to recipients of unemployment benefits, including
DUA benefits.
DUA Financing
DUA benefits are federally funded through the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
and administered by DOL through each state’s UC agency. The states report the amount of DUA
benefits that were attributable to the disaster. DOL then transfers funds to the states from the
Federal Unemployment Benefit and Allowance (FUBA) account. DOL is reimbursed for these
funds by FEMA.
Legislative Issues
111th Congress
2010 Budget
The President’s 2010 budget outline suggests that legislation is needed to make the UC system
more responsive to changing economic conditions, both as an automatic stabilizer and as an
effective social safety net. In a letter transmitting the Views and Estimates of the House
Committee on Ways and Means concerning 2010 budget issues within its purview, the Committee
states that it will continue to monitor the effectiveness of the 2009 stimulus package (ARRA),
including unemployment provisions in the package.
An ongoing question concerns whether the EB program can be altered so that it makes benefits
available more quickly to long-term unemployed workers, thereby avoiding the delays associated
with legislation to create special, temporary extended unemployment programs. Although
specifics are not yet available, reforms may center around the EB program and its trigger
mechanism. Potential issues may include the appropriateness of national versus state or regional
triggers, the use of the IUR versus the TUR, the trigger level, and the use of “lookbacks” to
unemployment in a reference period. (These issues are discussed in more detail in the EB section
of this report.)
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (P.L. 111-5, the 2009 stimulus package)
contains a number of important provisions that affect unemployment benefits. These provisions
include extension of the EUC08 program through December 2009; temporary 100% federal
Congressional Research Service
22
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
financing of the EB program; up to $7 billion for modernization of state unemployment
programs; a temporary $25 per week supplemental benefit for regular UC, EB, EUC08, TAA and
DUA benefits; temporary tax relief for unemployment benefits; and a temporary suspension of
interest accrual on loans to insolvent state UTF funds.27
Unemployment Compensation Modernization
The 2009 stimulus package provides for a special transfer of up to $7 billion in federal monies to
state unemployment programs as “incentive payments” for changing certain state UC laws. The
funds would be transferred from the federal unemployment account (FUA) in the UTF to the state
accounts within the UTF. The maximum incentive payment allowable for a state would be
calculated using the methods used in Reed Act distributions.
For a state to receive one-third of its potential distribution it must enact an alternative base period,
which ensures the last completed quarter of a worker’s employment is counted when determining
eligibility for unemployment benefits.
The remaining two-thirds of the $7 billion would be distributed to states contingent on their
qualifying for the first one-third, plus state law containing at least two of the following four
provisions: (1) permit former part-time workers to seek part-time work; (2) permit voluntary
separations from employment for compelling family reasons; (3) provide extended compensation
to UC recipients in training programs for high demand occupations; or (4) provide dependents
allowances to UC recipients with dependents.
In addition to the $7 billion in conditional transfers, the package immediately transfers a total of
$500 million to the states for the administration of UC programs, without conditions. These funds
may be used to pay for: (1) administration of the new provisions, if any, enacted in order to
receive shares of the $7 billion in special incentive payments; (2) improved outreach to
individuals who might be eligible for regular unemployment compensation by virtue of the
expansion provisions; (3) improvement of unemployment benefit and tax operations, including
responding to increased demand for unemployment compensation; and (4) staff-assisted
reemployment services for unemployment compensation claimants.
Supplemental Unemployment Benefit
The 2009 stimulus package will increase benefits by $25 per week through December 2009. This
supplemental benefit will be available to all individuals receiving regular unemployment (UC),
Extended Benefits (EB), Emergency Unemployment Compensation (EUC08), Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA) and Trade Adjustment Act (TAA) benefits. This supplemental
benefit will be grandfathered for individuals who have not exhausted the right to unemployment
compensation as of January 1, 2010; however, no additional compensation would be payable for
any week beginning after June 30, 2010. The supplemental benefit would be financed by the
federal government from general revenues and would not need to be repaid.
27
For additional information on unemployment provisions in the 2009 stimulus package, please see CRS Report
R40368, Unemployment Insurance Provisions in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, by Alison M.
Shelton, Kathleen Romig, and Julie M. Whittaker
Congressional Research Service
23
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
H.R. 291 (McDermott), Unemployment Supplemental Assistance Act contained a similar
additional (albeit more generous) $50 weekly benefit.
Extension of EUC08 Program
The 2009 stimulus package also extends the temporary EUC08 program through December 26,
2009. The program would be grandfathered for those receiving EUC08 benefits on December 26,
2009; however, no benefits would be payable after June 6, 2010. Following enactment of the
stimulus package, the extension of EUC08 benefits will be paid from the general funds of the
U.S. Treasury and will not need to be repaid.
Temporary Waiver of Interest Payments and the Accrual of Interest on Advances
to State Unemployment Funds
The stimulus package provides temporary relief to states that borrow from the Federal
Unemployment Account of the Unemployment Trust Fund. The interest payments due from
enactment of the stimulus package (February 17, 2009) until December 31, 2010, would be
deemed to have been made by the state. In addition, no interest on advances would accrue during
the period.
Temporary 100% EB Financing and Changes to EB Eligibility
The 2009 stimulus package temporarily changes the federal-state funding arrangement for the EB
program. The federal government will finance 100% of EB benefits through the end of 2009, with
the exception of state and local government employees’ EB benefits. The federal financing of EB
benefits in 2009 would be through the Extended Unemployment Compensation Account (EUCA)
in the Unemployment Trust Fund (UTF). In January 2010, EB financing would revert to 50%
state financing and 50% federal financing, unless the individual had been receiving EB when
financing was at 100% federal financing. Consistent with this change in financing requirements,
the stimulus package also continues the temporary suspension of the waiting week requirement
for federal funding until the week ending before May 30, 2010. Under the waiting week
requirement, now temporarily suspended, states that do not require a one-week UC waiting
period, or have an exception for any reason to the waiting period, pay 100% of the first week of
EB.
The 2009 stimulus package also temporarily allows states the option of expanding EB eligibility,
by ignoring the benefit year requirement and instead using EUC08 exhaustion as an eligibility
requirement for EB (as long as the state is triggered “on” for EB) during 2009. As the EB
program has operated in the past, a beneficiary had to be within his or her original “benefit year”
when the EB program triggered “on” in the state in order to receive EB benefits. Even though a
number of states triggered “on” for EB in the second half of 2008, the benefit year requirement
cause numerous individuals to be ineligible for EB because their benefit years had expired before
the state triggered “on.” Allowing states to use EUC08 exhaustion as an eligibility requirement
instead will cause more individuals to be eligible for the EB program. In addition, states can opt
to grandfather those who exhaust their EUC08 benefits after December 31, 2009 (although as
100% federal financing of the EB plan also ends with the end of 2009, states would be
responsible for 50% of the cost of these grandfathered EB payments).
Congressional Research Service
24
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
Temporary Suspension of Federal Income Tax on Unemployment Benefits
Tax relief would be provided to the unemployed through the exemption of the first $2,400 of
benefits from income taxation in tax year 2009. S. 155 and H.R. 155 proposed all unemployment
benefits be exempt.
Author Contact Information
Alison M. Shelton
Analyst in Income Security
ashelton@crs.loc.gov, 7-9558
Congressional Research Service
Julie M. Whittaker
Specialist in Income Security
jwhittaker@crs.loc.gov, 7-2587
25
November 6, 2010.24
Short-time Compensation (Work Sharing)
Short-time compensation (STC) is a program within the federal-state unemployment
compensation system. Seventeen states operate STC programs.
STC is a regular unemployment benefit, pro-rated for a partial work reduction, that is offered
within the context of a temporary work sharing arrangement. Under a work sharing arrangement,
a firm that is faced with a need to downsize temporarily reduces work hours for many or all
workers instead of laying off a smaller number of workers. For example, an employer might
reduce the work hours of the entire workforce by 20%, from five to four days a week, in lieu of
laying off 20% of the workforce.
States with STC programs require employers who seek STC for their workers to submit a formal
work sharing plan for approval. Once the state has approved an employer’s plan, the worksharing employees receive pro-rated unemployment compensation, or STC. In the above
example, the amount of STC provided to each worker would be 20% of the unemployment
benefit that a worker would have received had he or she been laid off.
Employers have used STC combined with work sharing arrangements to reduce labor costs while
retaining highly skilled workers. Work sharing can also reduce employers’ recruitment and
training costs by making it unnecessary to recruit new employees when business improves. On
the employee’s side, work sharing arrangements combined with STC can spread more moderate
earnings reductions across more employees—as opposed to imposing significant hardship on a
24
States that do not require a one-week UC waiting period, or have an exception for any reason to the waiting period,
pay 100% of the first week of EB. Twenty-five states, including Rhode Island and North Carolina, do not require a oneweek UC waiting period in all cases. P.L. 110-449 (as amended by P.L. 111-5, P.L. 111-118, P.L. 111-144, and P.L.
111-157) suspended this requirement until November 6, 2010.
Congressional Research Service
23
.
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
few. Work sharing and STC cannot, however, avert layoffs or plant closings if a company’s
financial situation is dire. In addition, some employers may choose not to adopt work sharing
because laying off workers may be a less expensive alternative.
STC benefits are charged to employers according to the experience rating rules of a state’s regular
unemployment program. Therefore, a firm generally incurs no more in UI tax costs by using STC
than it would through layoffs. Seven states also impose additional tax provisions on work sharing
employers, in order to ensure that employers who already pay the maximum state unemployment
tax rate share in the burden.
Currently, only 17 states operate STC programs to support work sharing arrangements. Through
the end of 2008, the STC program has never constituted more than about 1% of unemployment
benefits paid annually across the U.S, although very preliminary data for the first three quarters of
2009 indicate that this ratio may recently have risen to as high as 2%. The reasons for low state
and employer take-up of the STC program are not completely clear, but a key cause would appear
to be ambiguity in the 1992 federal law that authorizes STC. Because of this ambiguity, the U.S.
Department of Labor (DOL) has not provided guidance or technical assistance on STC to the
states since 1992. A more active public policy would require either DOL reinterpretation of the
1992 law or congressional action to either clarify federal law or give the Secretary of Labor
authority to determine needed additional provisions.25
Legislative Issues
111th Congress
2010 Budget
The President’s 2010 budget highlighted the need for legislation to make the UC system more
responsive to changing economic conditions, both as an automatic stabilizer and as an effective
social safety net. In a letter transmitting the Views and Estimates of the House Committee on
Ways and Means concerning 2010 budget issues within its purview, the Committee states that it
will continue to monitor the effectiveness of the 2009 stimulus package (ARRA), including
unemployment provisions in the package.
An ongoing question concerns whether the EB program can be altered so that it makes benefits
available more quickly to long-term unemployed workers, thereby avoiding the delays associated
with legislation to create special, temporary extended unemployment programs. Although
specifics are not yet available, reforms may center around the EB program and its trigger
mechanism. Potential issues may include the appropriateness of national versus state or regional
triggers, the use of the IUR versus the TUR, the trigger level, and the use of “lookbacks” to
unemployment in a reference period. (These issues are discussed in more detail in the “Extended
Benefit Program” section of this report.)
25
For more information on short-time compensation, see CRS Report R40689, Compensated Work Sharing
Arrangements (Short-Time Compensation) as an Alternative to Layoffs, by Alison M. Shelton.
Congressional Research Service
24
.
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
P.L. 111-5, The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
ARRA (P.L. 111-5, the 2009 stimulus package) contained a number of important provisions that
affect unemployment benefits. These provisions included extension of the EUC08 program
through December 2009; temporary 100% federal financing of the EB program; up to $7 billion
for modernization of state unemployment programs; a temporary $25 per week supplemental
benefit for regular UC, EB, EUC08, TAA and DUA benefits; temporary tax relief for
unemployment benefits; and a temporary suspension of interest accrual on loans to insolvent state
UTF funds.26
Unemployment Compensation Modernization
The 2009 stimulus package provided for a special transfer of up to $7 billion in federal monies to
state unemployment programs as “incentive payments” for changing certain state UC laws. The
funds are transferred from the federal unemployment account (FUA) in the UTF to qualifying
states’ UTF accounts. The maximum incentive payment allowable for a state is calculated using
the methods used in Reed Act distributions.
For a state to receive one-third of its potential distribution it must enact an alternative base period,
which ensures the last completed quarter of a worker’s employment is counted when determining
eligibility for unemployment benefits.
The remaining two-thirds of the $7 billion are distributed to states contingent on their qualifying
for the first one-third, plus state law containing at least two of the following four provisions:
(1) permit former part-time workers to seek part-time work; (2) permit voluntary separations from
employment for compelling family reasons; (3) provide extended compensation to UC recipients
in training programs for high-demand occupations; or (4) provide dependents allowances to UC
recipients with dependents.
In addition to the $7 billion in conditional transfers, the package immediately transferred a total
of $500 million to the states for the administration of UC programs, without conditions. These
funds could be used to pay for (1) administration of the new provisions, if any, enacted in order to
receive shares of the $7 billion in special incentive payments; (2) improvement of outreach to
individuals who might be eligible for regular unemployment compensation by virtue of the
expansion provisions; (3) improvement of unemployment benefit and tax operations, including
responding to increased demand for unemployment compensation; and (4) staff-assisted
reemployment services for unemployment compensation claimants.
Federal Additional Compensation(FAC)
The 2009 stimulus package, as amended, temporarily increases benefits by $25 per week. This
supplemental benefit is available to all individuals receiving regular UC, EB, EUC08, DUA, and
TAA benefits. This supplemental benefit will be grandfathered for individuals who have not
exhausted the right to unemployment compensation as of June 2, 2010; however, no federal
additional compensation is payable for any week beginning after October 5, 2010. The
26
For additional information on unemployment provisions in the 2009 stimulus package, please see CRS Report
R40368, Unemployment Insurance Provisions in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, by Alison M.
Shelton and Julie M. Whittaker.
Congressional Research Service
25
.
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
supplemental benefit is financed by the federal government from general revenues and would not
need to be repaid.
ARRA Provisions Affecting the EUC08 Program
The 2009 stimulus package, as amended, also extended the temporary EUC08 program through
April 5, 2010. Following enactment of the stimulus package, the extension of EUC08 benefits
began to be paid from the general funds of the U.S. Treasury and do not need to be repaid.
Temporary Waiver of Interest Payments and the Accrual of Interest on Advances
to State Unemployment Funds
The stimulus package provides temporary relief to states that borrow from the Federal
Unemployment Account of the Unemployment Trust Fund. The interest payments due between
enactment of the stimulus package (February 17, 2009) through December 31, 2010, would be
deemed to have been made by the state. In addition, no interest on advances accrue during the
period.
Temporary 100% EB Financing and Changes to EB Eligibility
The 2009 stimulus package (as amended) temporarily changes the federal-state funding
arrangement for the EB program. The federal government will finance 100% of EB benefits
through April 5, 2010, with the exception of state and local government employees’ EB benefits.
The 100% federal financing of EB benefits takes place through the EUCA in the UTF. After the
100% federal financing authorization ends, EB financing would revert to 50% state financing and
50% federal financing, although 100% financing would be grandfathered for individuals who
were receiving EB during the week that the authorization of 100% federal financing was
terminated. Consistent with this change in financing requirements, the stimulus package also
continues the temporary suspension of the waiting week requirement for federal funding until the
week ending before September 4, 2010. Under the waiting week requirement, now temporarily
suspended, states that do not require a one-week UC waiting period, or have an exception for any
reason to the waiting period, paid 100% of the first week of EB.
The 2009 stimulus package also temporarily allows states the option of expanding EB eligibility,
by ignoring the benefit year requirement and instead using EUC08 exhaustion as an eligibility
requirement for EB (as long as the state is triggered “on” for EB) until the expiration of the
EUC08 program. As the EB program has operated in the past, a beneficiary had to be within his
or her original “benefit year” when the EB program triggered “on” in the state in order to receive
EB benefits. Even though a number of states triggered “on” for EB in the second half of 2008, the
benefit year requirement cause numerous individuals to be ineligible for EB because their benefit
years had expired before the state triggered “on.” Allowing states to use EUC08 exhaustion as an
eligibility requirement instead will cause more individuals to be eligible for the EB program.
Temporary Suspension of Federal Income Tax on Unemployment Benefits
ARRA (P.L. 111-5) provided tax relief to the unemployed through the exemption of the first
$2,400 of benefits from income taxation in tax year 2009. S. 155 and H.R. 155 proposed all
unemployment benefits be exempt.
Congressional Research Service
26
.
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
P.L. 111-92, The Worker, Homeownership and Business Assistance Act of 2009
The President signed P.L. 111-92, the Worker, Homeownership and Business Assistance Act of
2009, into law on November 6, 2009. The law created an additional (new second) tier of up to 14
weeks of benefits, without regard to state unemployment rates. The law also created a fourth tier
of up to an additional six weeks of EUC08 benefits in states with unemployment rates of at least
8.5%. Other measures included in the proposal concerned eligibility for food stamp payments
(benefit eligibility and determination would not consider the $25 additional federal
unemployment benefit established in ARRA legislation); railroad workers (who have their own
unemployment insurance system) would receive approximately the same increase in potential
benefits; and the authorization of the 0.2% FUTA surtax is extended through 2010 and the first
six months of calendar year 2011.
P.L. 111-118, The Department of Defense Appropriations Act
On December 19, 2009, the President signed P.L. 111-118, the Department of Defense
Appropriations Act of 2010, into law. P.L. 111-118 extended the EUC08 program through the end
of February 2010. The law also extended the 100% federal financing of the EB program and the
$25 supplemental weekly benefit through end-February 2010.
P.L. 111-144, The Temporary Extension Act of 2010
On March 2, 2010, the President signed P.L. 111-144, the Temporary Extension Act of 2010. P.L.
111-144 extended three temporary provisions through April 5, 2010: EUC08, the $25
supplemental weekly benefit, and 100% federal EB financing. The Senate passed H.R. 4691
without amendment on March 2, 2010, and the President signed the bill that day.
P.L. 111-157, The Continuing Extension Act of 2010
On April 15, 2010, the President signed P.L. 111-157, the Continuing Extension Act of 2010 into
law. P.L. 111-157 extends the availability of EUC08, 100% federal financing of EB, and the $25
FAC benefits, until the week ending on or before June 2, 2010.
Current Legislation
On March 10, 2010, the Senate passed H.R. 4213, the Tax Extenders Act of 2010. H.R. 4213
would extend the availability of EUC08, 100% federal financing of EB, and the $25 FAC
benefits, through the end of December 2010. Because the original bill was amended by the Senate
in the nature of a substitute (S.Amdt. 3336), the Senate-passed version must now go back to the
House for consideration.
H.R. 4183 would have extended the authorization of the EUC08 program through March 2011. It
also would have extended the FAC benefit as well as the 100% federal financing for EB through
March 2011. Additionally, it would have provided 100% federal financing for short-time
compensation benefits through March 2011.27
27
For information on short-time compensation programs see CRS Report R40689, Compensated Work Sharing
(continued...)
Congressional Research Service
27
.
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
S. 2831 would extend the authorization of the EUC08 program through December 2010. It would
extend the FAC benefit as well as the 100% federal financing for EB through December 2010.
The bill would allow the unemployed to opt to continue to receive their remaining EUC08
entitlements rather than reapply for UC at the end of their benefit year. It would suspend the
federal taxation of the first $2400 of unemployment benefits through 2010. The bill would also
require the U.S. Department of Labor to conduct a study on the implementation of the EUC08
program. Additionally, S. 2831 provides 100% federal financing for short-time compensation
benefits through 2011.
Senator Reed introduced S. 1646, the Keep Americans Working Act, to provide federal financing
to states for 100% of benefits paid to workers who participate in an STC program, contingent on
employer certification that health and retirement benefits are not affected by participation in the
STC program. The bill would also provide start-up grants to states and would allow the DOL to
reimburse states for administrative expenses. Representative DeLauro has introduced a
companion bill, H.R. 4135, in the House of Representatives. Senator Reed included substantially
the same STC provisions from S. 1646 in S. 2831, the Helping Unemployed Workers Act.
Representative McDermott introduced H.R. 4183, the Helping Unemployment Workers Act,
which would require the Secretary of Labor to pay 100% of STC benefits to the unemployment
trust fund accounts of states whose STC programs have been certified by the Secretary of Labor.
(...continued)
Arrangements (Short-Time Compensation) as an Alternative to Layoffs, by Alison M. Shelton.
Congressional Research Service
28
.
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
Appendix A. Unemployment Insurance
Benefits
Figure A-1. Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits
Source: CRS.
Congressional Research Service
29
.
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
Appendix B. Summary of EUC08 Program
Table B-1. Emergency Unemployment Compensation Program:
Public Law, Benefits, Effective Dates, and Financing
Public Law
Benefit Tiers and Availability
Supplemental Appropriations Act of
2008, Title IV Emergency
Unemployment Compensation
(P.L. 110-252), signed June 30, 2008
13 weeks (all states)
Unemployment Compensation
Extension Act of 2008 (P.L. 110-449),
signed November 21, 2008.
Tier I: 20 weeks (all states)
American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009
(P.L. 111-5), signed February 17,
2009.
Same as above.
Worker, Homeowner, and Business
Assistance Act of 2009 (P.L. 111-92),
signed November 6, 2009.
Tier I: 20 weeks (all states)
Dates in Effect and Financing
7/6/2008-3/29/2009
(No benefits past 7/4/2009)
Funded by federal EUCA funds
within UTF.
Tier II: 13 additional weeks (33
weeks total) if state TUR is 6% or
higher or IUR is 4% or higher
[Note this included several other
interventions that augmented UC
benefits. The Federal Additional
Compensation (FAC) benefit of
$25/week for those receiving UC,
EUC08, EB, DUA, or TAA. At state
option, EB benefit year could be
calculated based upon exhausting
EUC08 benefits. 100% federal
financing of EB program. First $2400
of unemployment benefits were
excluded from income tax in 2009.]
Tier II: 14 additional weeks (34
weeks total, all states)
Tier III: 13 additional weeks if state
TUR is 6% or higher or IUR is 4% or
higher (47 weeks total)
11/23/2008-3/29/2009
(No benefits past 8/29/2009)
Funded by federal EUCA funds
within UTF.
2/22/2009-12/26/2009
(No benefits past 6/6/2010)
Funded by general fund of the
Treasury. (Additionally, the FAC
program is funded by the general
fund of the Treasury. The 100%
financing of the EB program is
funded by the EUCA funds within
the UTF.)
11/8/2009-12/26/2009
(No benefits past 6/6/2010)
Funded by general fund of the
Treasury.
Tier IV: 6 additional weeks if state
TUR is 8.5% or higher or IUR is 6%
or higher (53 weeks total)
Department of Defense
Appropriations Act, 2010
(P.L. 111-118), signed December 19,
2009.
Same as above.
Temporary Extension Act of 2010
(P.L. 111-144), signed March 2, 2010.
Same as above.
12/27/2009-2/27/2010
(No benefits past 7/31/2010)
Funded by general fund of the
Treasury.
2/28/2010-4/3/2010
(No benefits past 9/4/2010)
Funded by general fund of the
Treasury.
Congressional Research Service
30
.
Unemployment Insurance: Available Unemployment Benefits and Legislative Activity
Public Law
The Continuing Extension Act of
2010 (P.L. 111-157), signed April 15,
2010
Benefit Tiers and Availability
Same as above.
Dates in Effect and Financing
4/3/2010-5/29/2010
(No benefits past 11/ 6/ 2010)
Funded by general fund of the
Treasury.
Source: CRS.
Author Contact Information
Julie M. Whittaker
Specialist in Income Security
jwhittaker@crs.loc.gov, 7-2587
Katelin P. Isaacs
Analyst in Income Security
kisaacs@crs.loc.gov, 7-7355
Alison M. Shelton
Analyst in Income Security
ashelton@crs.loc.gov, 7-9558
Congressional Research Service
31