Order Code RS22204
Updated March 15April 13, 2007
U.S. Trade Deficit and the
Impact of Rising Oil Prices
James K. Jackson
Specialist in International Trade and Finance
Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division
Summary
Petroleum prices have risen sharply since early 2005. At the same time the average
amount of imports of energy-related petroleum products has fallen slightly. The
combination of sharply rising prices and a slightly lower level of imports of energyrelated petroleum products translates into an escalating cost for those imports. This
rising cost added an estimated $70 billion to the nation’s trade deficit in 2005 and $50
billion in 2006. Imported energy prices moderated in January and February 2007, but
began rising
again in February and MarchMarch and April, following a pattern of rising prices energy import prices
in the spring and
summer. This report provides an estimate of the initial impact of the
rising oil prices
on the nation’s merchandise trade deficit. This report will be updated
as warranted by
events.
Background
According to data published by the Census Bureau of the Department of Commerce,1
the prices of petroleum products over the past year have risen considerably faster than the
change in demand for those products. As a result, the price increases of imported energyrelated petroleum products worsened the U.S. trade deficit in 2005 and 2006. Energyrelated petroleum products is a term used by the Census Bureau that includes crude oil,
petroleum preparations, and liquefied propane and butane gas. Crude oil comprises the
largest share by far within this broad category of energy-related imports. The increase in
the trade deficit is expected to have a slightly negative impact on U.S. gross domestic
product (GDP) and could place further downward pressure on the dollar against a broad
range of other currencies. To the extent that the additions to the merchandise trade deficit
are returned to the U.S. economy as payment for additional U.S. exports or to acquire
1
Census Bureau, Department of Commerce. Report FT900, U.S. International Trade in Goods
and Services, March 9April 13, 2007. Table 17. The report and supporting tables are available at
[http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/Press-Release/current_press_release/ftdpress.pdf].
CRS-2
such assets as securities or U.S. businesses, some of the negative effects could be
mitigated.
Table 1 presents summary data from the Census Bureau for the change in the
volume, or quantity, of energy-related petroleum imports and the change in the price, or
the value, of those imports for 2006 and for 2007. The data indicate that the United States
imported 4.9 billion barrels of total energy-related petroleum products in 2006, valued at
$291 billion. In JanuaryThrough February 2007, the quantity of energy-related petroleum imports increased
by 0
fell by 5.6%, while crude oil imports rose by nearly 6.0% overfell by 3.5% from the same period in 2006.
,
reflecting a milder-than-normal winter. During the same period, the value of energy-relatedenergyrelated petroleum products imports fell by
2.5 9.1%, while the value of crude oil imports increased by 6.3fell
by 5.8%. As Figure 1 shows,
imports of energy-related petroleum products can vary
sharply on a monthly basis, but
averaged about 410 barrels a month in 2006.
Table 1. Summary Data of U.S. Imports of Energy-Related
Petroleum Products, Including Oil (not seasonally adjusted)
January through February
2006
Quantity
(thousands
of barrels)
2007
Value
(thousands of
dollars)
Quantity
(thousands
of barrels)
Percent
Value
change
(thousands of
2005 to
dollars)
2006
Percent
change
2005 to
2006
Total energyrelated Petroleum
Products
415,788
$22,579,751
418,158
0.6%
$22,010,536
-2.5%
Crude oil
302,812
$15,724,715
320,108
5.7%
$16,720,818
6.3794,509
$43,317,798
749,976
-5.6%
$39,357,977
-9.1%
Crude oil
593,844
$31,360,266
572,977
-3.5%
$29,543,589
-5.8%
January through December
2006
2007
(Actual values)
(Estimated values)
Quantity
(thousands
of barrels)
Total energyrelated Petroleum
Products
4,887,772
Value
(thousands of
dollars)
$291,285,295
Quantity
(thousands
of barrels)
4,915,632613,808
Percent
Value
change
(thousands of
2004 to
dollars)
2005
0.6%
$283,942,257-5.6%
$264,657,957
Percent
change
2004 to
2005
-2.59.1%
Crude oil
3,741,205 $216,998,507
3,954,895
5.7% $230,744,566
6.3609,743
-3.5% $204,427,944
-5.8%
Source: Census Bureau, Department of Commerce. Report FT900, U.S. International Trade in Goods and
Services, March 9April 13, 2007. Table 17.
Note: Estimates for January through December of 20072006 were developed by CRS from data through the first
monthtwo months of 2007 and data through 2006 published by the Census Bureau using a straight line
extrapolation.
In value terms, energy-related imports rose from about $243 billion in 2005 to $291
billion in 2006, or an increase of 19.6% to account for about 16% of the value of total
U.S. merchandise imports. An estimate for 2007, based only on data for January,
indicates that the cost of imported energy will fall slightly in 2007on data for the first two months
of 2007, indicate a slow start to the seasonal rise in energy prices, compared with the
sharp rise experienced in 2005 and 2006. Price data for FebruaryMarch and early MarchApril 2007,
CRS-3
Figure 1. Quantity of U.S. Imports of Energy-Related
Petroleum Products
Millions of barrels
460
450
440
430
420
410
400
390
380
370
360
350
340
330
Jan Mar May Jly Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jly Sep Nov Jan
Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec Feb
2005
2006
2007
Source: Department of Commerce
however, show a sharp run-up in the price of imported energy in those months and likely
CRS-3
will alter the estimates for
will exert considerable upward pressure on forthcoming estimates of the total cost of
energy imports for 2007. As Figure 2 shows,
the cost of U.S. imports of energy-related
petroleum products has risen from about $15
billion per month in early 2005 to more than
$30 billion a month in August 2006, before
falling back to $20 billion a month in
December 2006 and $2217 billion in JanuaryFebruary 2007.
Data for 2006 indicate that because of a slight
decrease in the quantity of imports
combined with nearly a 20% increase in the price of
imported energy products, caused the U.S.
trade deficit in energy trade roseto rise by about $50
billion to reach nearly $300 billion. After
rising steadily since March 2006, the average
price of oil retreated in September through
November before rising slightly again in December 2006.
Figure 1. Quantity of U.S. Imports of Energy-Related Petroleum
Products
460
Millions of barrels
450
440
430
420
410
400
390
380
370
Jan Mar May Jly Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jly Sep Nov Jan
Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec
2005
2006
2007
Source: Department of Commerce
Figure
December 2006.
Figure 2. Value of U.S. Imports of Energy-Related Petroleum
Products
$32
$30
Billions of dollars
$30
$28
$26
$24
$22
$20
$18
$16
$14
$12
$10
Jan Mar May Jly Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jly Sep Nov Jan
Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec Feb
2005
2006
2007
Source: Department of Commerce
CRS-4
At an average price of $58 per barrel in 2006, average oil import prices are 24%
higher than they were in the comparable period in 2005, as indicated in Table 2. As a
result of the overall rise in the value of energy-related imports in 2006, such imports now
account for about one-third of the total value of the U.S. trade deficit, up from one-fifth
in less than two years, but still account for less than the average share during much of the
1990s, when such imports at times accounted for half of the overall U.S. trade deficit.
Table 2. U.S. Imports of Energy-Related Petroleum Products,
Including Crude Oil (not seasonally adjusted)
Total energy-related
petroleum products a
Period
Quantity
Value
(thousands (thousands of
of barrels)
dollars)
Crude oil
Quantity
(thousands
of barrels)
Thousands of
Value
Unit
barrels per (thousands of
price
day (average)
dollars)
(dollars)
20052006
Jan. - Dec.
- Dec.
5,004,339
243,496,863
3,754,669
10,287
175,755,341
46.81
4,887,772
291,285,295
3,741205
10,250
216,998,507
58.00
January
415,788
22,579,751
302,812
9,768
15,724,715
51.93
February
378,721
20,738,047
291,032
10,394
15,635,550
53.72
March
397,983
21,517,289
312,479
10,080
16,330,455
52.26
April
392,159
23,396,506
293,844
9,795
16,695,611
56.82
May
433,399
27,906,197
323,827
10,446
19,992,671
61.74
June
420,067
26,958,936
330,862
11,029
20,527,259
62.04
July
423,624
28,438,931
321,576
10,373
20,849,998
64.84
August
450,451
30,497,305
343,485
11,080
22,710,736
66.12
September
413,659
25,808,397
316,591
10,553
19,792,869
62.52
October
399,830
22,315,158
311,758
10,057
17,292,560
55.47
November
381,230
20,238,356
299,401
9,980
15,642,961
52.25
December
380,861
20,890,421
293,538
9,469
15,803,122
53.84
January
418,158
22,010,536
320,108
10,326
16,720,818
52.23
2006
Jan. - Dec.
2007
JanuaryFebruary
331,818
17,347,440
252,869
9,031
12,822,771
50.71
2007
Source: Census Bureau, Department of Commerce. Report FT900, U.S. International Transactions in
Goods and Services. March 9April 13, 2007. Table 17.
Note: Energy-related petroleum products is a term used by the Census Bureau and includes crude oil,
petroleum preparations, and liquefied propane and butane gas.
Recent data indicate that the drop in imported energy prices to about $54 per barrel
toward the end of 2006 from the high of an average of $66 per barrel reached in August
2006 helped reduce the overall cost of energy imports so that the trade deficit in 2006 rose
by about $50 billion, an amount equivalent to an increase of about 7% in the merchandise
trade deficit due to higher oil prices. In terms of the U.S. economy, the estimated rise in
the trade deficit from the increase in oil prices in 2005 is equivalent to about one-half of
a percentage point of U.S. nominal GDP. In a letter to Congress’ Joint Economic
CRS-5
Committee, Federal Reserve Board Chairman Alan Greenspan estimated that higher
CRS-5
energy prices since the end of 2003 have lowered U.S. GDP by three-fourths of a
percentage point in 2005 after having reduced growth by about one-half a point in 2004.2
Crude oil comprises the largest share of energy-related petroleum products imports.
According to Census Bureau data3 as shown in Table 2, imports of crude oil fell from an
average of 10.28 million barrels of crude oil imports per day in 2005 to an average of
10.25 million barrels per day in 2006, or a decrease of less than one percent. In December
2006, such imports averaged 9.5 million barrels per day, or a decrease of 6.6% from the
volume of such imports recorded in December 2005. Overall, data for oil imports based
on year-over-year data indicate that oil volumes decreased by 0.4% in 2006 from the
respective period in 2005. From 2005 to 2006, the average price of crude oil increased
from $46.81 per barrel to $58.00 per barrel for an increase of 24%, as shown in Figure
3. As a result, the value of U.S. energy-related imports rose from about $18 billion a
month in March 2005 to about $30 billion a month in September 2006, before falling to
$21 billion a month in December 2006, the lowest monthly total recorded since July 2005.
Data for 2007 indicate that a milder-than-normal winter sharply reduced crude oil
imports through February 2007 and average oil import prices dropped nearly 4% from the
average prices recorded in January 2007. The declines in prices and volumes of oil
imports experienced in January and February, however, likely will turn around sharply in
March and April, when both import volumes and import prices started moving higher.
Figure 3. U.S. Import Price of Crude Oil
Dollars per barrel
$68
$66
$64
$62
$60
$58
$56
$54
$52
$50
$48
$46
$44
$42
$40
$38
$36
$34
$32
Jan Mar May Jly Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jly Sep Nov Jan
Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec Feb
2005
2006
2007
Source: Department of Commerce
Issues for Congress
The rise in prices of energy imports experienced since early 2004 is expected to have
a relatively minor impact on the rate of economic growth in 2006, but could pose a
2
Aversa, Jeannine, “Oil Prices Said to Slow U.S. Economy a Bit.” The Washington Post, July
18, 2005.
3
Report FT900, U.S. International Trade in Goods and Services, April 13, 2007. Table 17.
CRS-6
number of policy issues for Congress. The impact of the rise in energy import prices may
well lessen somewhat as energy prices stabilize of fall slightly for the rest of 2006. It is
likely, however, that energy prices will rise rapidly again in 2007, especially in the late
2
Aversa, Jeannine, “Oil Prices Said to Slow U.S. Economy a Bit.” The Washington Post, July
18, 2005.
3
Report FT900, U.S. International Trade in Goods and Services, March 9, 2007. Table 17.
CRS-6
spring-early summer period of 2007. Most immediately, the higher prices of energy
imports will worsen the nation’s merchandise trade deficit and have a disproportionate
impact on the energy-intensive sectors of the economy and on households on fixed
incomes.
Over the long run, a sustained increase in the prices of energy imports will
permanently increase the nation’s merchandise trade deficit, although some of this impact
could be offset if some of the dollars are returned to the U.S. economy through increased
purchases of U.S. goods and services or through purchases of such other assets as
securities or U.S. businesses. Also, over the long-run it is possible for the economy to
adjust to the higher prices of energy imports by improving its energy efficiency, finding
alternative sources of energy, or searching out additional supplies of energy.
For Congress, the increase in the nation’s merchandise trade deficit could add to
existing pressures to examine the causes of the deficit and to address the underlying
factors that are generating that deficit. In addition, the rise in prices of energy imports
could add to concerns about the nation’s reliance on foreign supplies for energy imports
and add impetus to examining the nation’s energy strategy. The increased outflow of
dollars may well add to public and Congressional concerns about foreign acquisitions of
U.S. firms and to concerns about the growing share of outstanding U.S. Treasury
securities that are owned by foreigners. While the rise in energy prices can be expected
to lead eventually to improvements in energy efficiency and to alternative sources of
energy, there may well be increased pressure applied to Congress to assist in this process.
crsphpgw