< Back to Current Version

U.S. Trade Deficit and the Impact of Changing Oil Prices

Changes from June 9, 2006 to July 13, 2006

This page shows textual changes in the document between the two versions indicated in the dates above. Textual matter removed in the later version is indicated with red strikethrough and textual matter added in the later version is indicated with blue.


Order Code RS22204 Updated June 9July 13, 2006 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web U.S. Trade Deficit and the Impact of Rising Oil Prices James K. Jackson Specialist in International Trade and Finance Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Summary Petroleum prices have risen sharply since early 2004. At the same time the average amount of imports of energy-related petroleum products has fallen slightly. The combination of sharply rising prices and a slightly lower level of imports of energyrelated petroleum products translates into an escalating cost for those imports. This rising cost added an estimated $70 billion to the nation’s trade deficit in 2005 and could add $80- - $100 billion in 2006, depending on how sustainable is the rate of recent price increases. This report provides an estimate of the initial impact of the rising oil prices on the nation’s merchandise trade deficit. This report will be updated as warranted by events. Background According to data published by the Census Bureau of the Department of Commerce,1 the prices of petroleum products over the past year have risen considerably faster than the change in demand for those products. As a result, the price increases of imported energyrelated petroleum products worsened the U.S. trade deficit in 2005 and likely will do so again in 2006. Energy-related petroleum products is a term used by the Census Bureau that includes crude oil, petroleum preparations, and liquefied propane and butane gas. Crude oil comprises the largest share by far within this broad category of energy-related imports. The increase in the trade deficit is expected to have a slightly negative impact on U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) and could place further downward pressure on the dollar against a broad range of other currencies. To the extent that the additions to the merchandise trade deficit are returned to the U.S. economy as payment for additional U.S. exports or to acquire such assets as securities or U.S. businesses, some of the negative effects could be mitigated. 1 Census Bureau, Department of Commerce. Report FT900, U.S. International Trade in Goods and Services, June 9July 12, 2006. Table 17. The report and supporting tables are available at [http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/Press-Release/current_press_release/ftdpress.pdf]. Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress CRS-2 Table 1 presents summary data from the Census Bureau for the change in the volume, or quantity, of energy-related petroleum imports and the change in the price, or the value, of those imports for 2005 and for 2006. The data indicate that the United States imported 5.0 billion barrels of total energy-related petroleum products in 2005, valued at $243 billion. In January through AprilMay 2006, the quantity of imports decreased slightly form the same period in 2005, for a decrease in as the volume of total energy-related petroleum products imports of 3.3fell 2.0%. As Figure 1 shows, imports of energy-related petroleum products can vary sharply on a monthly basis, but averaged about 417 barrels a month in 2005 and about 400 barrels a month in 2006. Table 1. Summary Data of U.S. Imports of Energy-Related Petroleum Products, Including Oil (not seasonally adjusted) January through AprilMay 2005 Quantity (thousands of barrels) 2006 Value (thousands of dollars) Quantity (thousands of barrels) Percent Value change (thousands of 2005 to dollars) 2006 Percent change 2005 to 2006 Total energyrelated Petroleum Products 1,638,875 $67,219,962 1,584,651 -3.3% $88,231,593 31.3% Crude oil 1,258,919 $49,838,700 1,200,167 -4.7% $64,386,332 29.2%2,059,339 $85,908,535 2,018,050 -2.0% $116,137,791 35.2% Crude oil 1,578,901 $63,612,285 1,523,994 -3.5% 32.6% $84,379,003 January through December 2005 2006 (Actual values) (Estimated values) Quantity (thousands of barrels) Total energyrelated Petroleum Products 5,004,339 Value (thousands of dollars) $243,496,863 Quantity (thousands of barrels) 4,904,004 Percent Value change (thousands of 2004 to dollars) 2005 Percent change 2004 to 2005 Total energyrelated Petroleum Products 5,000,235 $243,181,966 4,834,797 -3.3% $319,195,840 31.3% Crude oil 3,753,088 $175,563,018 3,577,937 -4.7% $226,808,861 29.2% -2.0% $329,177,861 Percent change 2004 to 2005 35.2% Crude oil 3,754,669 $175,755,341 3,624,099 -3.5% $233,132,019 32.6% Source: Census Bureau, Department of Commerce. Report FT900, U.S. International Trade in Goods and Services, June 9July 12, 2006. Table 17. Note: Estimates for January through December of 2006 were developed by CRS from data through the first fourfive months of 2006 and data through 2005 published by the Census Bureau using a straight line extrapolation. In value terms, energy-related imports rose from over $67about $86 billion in January-AprilMay 2005 to $88116 billion in the same period in 2006, or an increase of 31.335.2%. If the rate of price increases experienced through AprilMay 2006 hold for the year, the value of U.S. energy-related energyrelated imports could rise to $320 - $340 billion in 2006, or more than $80 -$100 billion -$100 billion more than in 2005. As Figure 2 shows, the cost of U.S. imports of energy-related petroleum products has risen from about $11.5 billion per month in early 2004 to about $2328 billion a month in April 2006, down from the record $26 billion a month in October 2005. Based on May 2006, the highest monthly amount recorded so far. Based on the data for 2005, the increase in the price of imports of total energy- CRS-3 related petroleum products added $70 billion to the annual U.S. trade deficit. An estimate for 2006 CRS-3 indicates that an increase in the quantity of imports at the current rate and if oil import import prices hold in the range of $65-$70 per barrel throughout 2006, the U.S. trade deficit in in energy trade could rise by more than $80-$100 billion to reach about $340 billion. This estimate could be higher if oil prices fluctuate highercontinue to trend upward during the year, as they did in 2005. Figure 1. Quantity of U.S. Imports of Energy-Related Petroleum Products 450 Millions of barrels 440 430 420 410 400 390 380 370 Jan Mar May Jly Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jly Sep Nov Jan Mar May Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec Feb Apr 2004 2005 2006 Source: Department of Commerce Figure 2. Value of U.S. Importsimports of Energy-Related Petroleum Products $30 Billions of dollars $27 $26 $25 $24 $23 $22 $21 $20 $19 $18 $17 $16 $15 $14 $13 $12 $11 $28 $26 $24 $22 $20 $18 $16 $14 $12 $10 Jan Mar May Jly Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jly Sep Nov Jan Mar May Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec Feb Apr 2004 2005 2006 Source: Department of Commerce CRS-4 At an average price of over $60$50 per barrel in December 2005, oil prices had moderated slightly from the average priceMay 2006, oil prices exceeded the previous record of $57 per barrel reached in September 2005, as indicated in Table 2. As a result of this sharp rise in the value of energy-related imports in 2005, 2006, such imports now CRS-4 account for over one-third of the total value of the U.S. trade deficit, up from one-fifth in less than two years, but still account for less than the average share during much of the 1990s, when such imports at times accounted for half of the overall U.S. trade deficit. Table 2. U.S. Imports of Energy-Related Petroleum Products, Including Crude Oil (not seasonally adjusted) Total energy-related petroleum products a Period Quantity Value (thousands (thousands of of barrels) dollars) Crude oil Quantity (thousands of barrels) Thousands of Value Unit barrels per (thousands of price day (average) dollars) (dollars) 2004 Jan.- Dec. 4,917,591 $174,499,173 3,820,979 10,440 $131,742,664 $34.48 November 439,794 17,892,337 329,660 10,989 13,577,287 41.19 December 410,406 15,280,713 320,586 10,341 11,689,111 36.46 Jan-Dec. 5,000,235 243,181,966 3,753,088 10,282 175,563,018 46.78 Jan.-Apr. 1,638,875 67,219,962 1,258,919 10,491 49,838,700 39.59 January 416,368 15,226,958 322,803 10,413 11,410,258 35.35 February 389,832 14,947,342 296,929 10,605 10,942,242 36.85 March 420,260 17,955,052 325,979 10,515 13,410,140 41.14 April 410,265 18,941,511 313,811 10,460 14,044,645 44.76 May 418,308 18,608,834 318,630 10,278 13,726,092 43.08 June 432,053 19,928,053 328,321 10,944 14,577,503 44.40 July 417,911 20,968,576 312,022 10,065 15,297,700 49.03 August 428,305 23,181,368 325,814 10,510 17,155,252 52.65 September 388,809 23,176,557 278,453 9,282 15,961,823 57.32 October 440,383 26,161,721 304,482 9,822 17,139,812 56.29 November 421,086 22,714,175 314,361 10,479 16,396,855 52.16 December 416,656 21,374,818 311,484 10,048 15.500,697 49.76 1,584,651 88,231,593 1,200,167 10,001 64,386,332 53.65Jan - Dec. 5,004,339 243,496,863 3,754,669 10,287 175,755,341 46.81 Jan.- May 2,059,339 85,908,535 1,578,901 10,456 63,612,285 40.29 January 419,291 15,301,289 325,786 10,509 11,491,026 35.27 February 387,899 14,907,930 293,425 10,479 10,835,581 36.93 March 418,418 17,923,939 324,180 10,457 13,383,428 41.28 April 413,267 19,086,805 315,528 10,518 14,128,664 44.78 May 420,464 18,688,573 319,982 10,322 13,773,585 43.04 June 430,594 19,878,379 327,865 10,929 14,559,106 44.41 July 419,157 21,046,507 312,106 10,068 15,314,485 49.07 August 433,073 23,534,564 329,039 10,614 17,391,215 52.85 September 389,645 23,332,358 277,589 9,253 15,938,226 57.42 October 432,162 25,567,322 300,884 9,706 16,911,547 56.21 November 422,459 22,790,054 314,028 10,468 16,380,931 52.16 December 417,910 21,439,144 314,259 10,137 15.647,547 49.79 2,018,050 116,137,791 1,523,994 10,093 84,379,003 53.37 January 415,788 22,579,751 302,812 9,768 15,724,715 51.93 February 378,721 20,738,047 291,032 10,394 15,635,550 53.72 March 397,983 21,517,289 312,479 10,080 16,330,455 52.26 April 392,159 23,396,506 293,844 9,795 16,695,611 56.82 May 433,399 27,906,197 323,827 10,446 19,992,671 61.74 2005 2006 Jan. - Apr.May Source: Census Bureau, Department of Commerce. Report FT900, U.S. International Transactions in Goods and Services. June 9July 12, 2006. Table 17. Note: Energy-related petroleum products is a term used by the Census Bureau and includes crude oil, petroleum preparations, and liquefied propane and butane gas. CRS-5 Due to the variability in oil prices, it is not possible to provide a precise estimate of the annual merchandise trade deficit for 2006 that will arise as a result of the increase in oil prices, but it is reasonable to assume that the trade deficit in 2006 could rise by about $80- - $100 billion, an amount equivalent to an increase of at least 10% in the merchandise CRS-5 trade deficit due to higher oil prices. In terms of the U.S. economy, the estimated rise in the trade deficit from the increase in oil prices in 2005 is equivalent to about one-half of a percentage point of U.S. nominal GDP. In a letter to Congress’ Joint Economic Committee, Federal Reserve Board Chairman Alan Greenspan estimated that higher energy prices since the end of 2003 have lowered U.S. GDP by three-fourths of a percentage point in 2005 after having reduced growth by about one-half a point in 2004.2 Crude oil comprises the largest share of energy-related petroleum products imports. According to Census Bureau data3 as shown in Table 2, imports of crude oil fell from an average of 10.4 million barrels of crude oil imports per day in 2004 to an average of 10.3 million barrels per day in 2005 period, or a decrease of 1.5 %. In AprilMay 2006, such imports were 9.8rose to 10.4 million barrels per day, or a decline of 6.4% froman increase of 1.2% over the volume of such imports imports recorded in AprilMay 2005. From 2004 to 2005, the average price of crude oil increased from $34.48 per barrel in 2004 to $46.78 per barrel in 2005 for an increase of 33%, as shown in Figure 3. As a result, the value of U.S. energy-related imports rose from about $11.6 billion a month in January 2004 to about $21 billion a month in December 2005, In April May 2006, oil prices resumed the rise experienced throughout much of 2005 and rose to over $56 $61 per barrel, or an increase of 2743% over the price of a barrel of oil in AprilMay 2005. As a result, the cost of total energy imports rose to $27.9 billion in May 2006. Figure 3. U.S. Import Price of Crude Oil Dollars per barrel $64 $62 $60 $58 $56 $54 $52 $50 $48 $46 $44 $42 $40 $38 $36 $34 $32 $30 $28 Jan Mar May Jly Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jly Sep Nov Jan Mar May Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec Feb Apr 2004 2006 2005 Source: Department of Commerce Issues for Congress The rise in prices of energy imports experienced since early 2004 is expected to have a relatively minor impact on the rate of economic growth in 2005, but could pose a 2 Aversa, Jeannine, “Oil Prices Said to Slow U.S. Economy a Bit.” The Washington Post, July 18, 2005. 3 Report FT900, U.S. International Trade in Goods and Services, June 9, 2006. Table 17. CRS-6 Issues for Congress The rise in prices of energy imports experienced since early 2004 is expected to have a relatively minor impact on the rate of economic growth in 2005, but could pose aJuly 12, 2006. Table 17. CRS-6 number of policy issues for Congress. The impact of the rise in energy import prices so far could become more pronounced in 2006 if such prices continue to rise at the rapid rate experienced in the late spring-early summer period of 2005. Most immediately, the higher prices of energy imports will worsen the nation’s merchandise trade deficit and have a disproportionate impact on the energy-intensive sectors of the economy and on households on fixed incomes. Over the long run, a sustained increase in the prices of energy imports will permanently increase the nation’s merchandise trade deficit, although some of this impact could be offset if some of the dollars are returned to the U.S. economy through increased purchases of U.S. goods and services or through purchases of such other assets as securities or U.S. businesses. Also, over the long-run it is possible for the economy to adjust to the higher prices of energy imports by improving its energy efficiency, finding alternative sources of energy, or searching out additional supplies of energy. For Congress, the increase in the nation’s merchandise trade deficit could add to existing pressures to examine the causes of the deficit and to address the underlying factors that are generating that deficit. In addition, the rise in prices of energy imports could add to concerns about the nation’s reliance on foreign supplies for energy imports and add impetus to examining the nation’s energy strategy. The increased outflow of dollars may well add to public and Congressional concerns about foreign acquisitions of U.S. firms and to concerns about the growing share of outstanding U.S. Treasury securities that are owned by foreigners. While the rise in energy prices can be expected to lead eventually to improvements in energy efficiency and to alternative sources of energy, there may well be increased pressure applied to Congress to assist in this process.