< Back to Current Version

International Species Conservation Funds

Changes from February 22, 2006 to October 10, 2006

This page shows textual changes in the document between the two versions indicated in the dates above. Textual matter removed in the later version is indicated with red strikethrough and textual matter added in the later version is indicated with blue.


Order Code RS21157 Updated February 22October 10, 2006 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Multinational Species Conservation Fund Pervaze A. Sheikh Analyst in Natural Resources Policy Resources, Science, and Industry Division M. Lynne Corn Specialist in Natural Resources Policy Resources, Science, and Industry Division Summary The Multinational Species Conservation Fund is a relatively small program within the Fish and Wildlife Service whichthat has generated enormous constituent interest, chiefly concerning its funding levels. This report describes the Fund briefly, and summarizes recent and proposed appropriations levels. It will be updated as events warrant. The Multinational Species Conservation Fund (MSCF), which currently benefits tigers, the six species of rhinoceroses, Asian and African elephants, and great apes (gorillas, chimpanzees, bonobos, orangutans, and the various species of gibbons), has generated a tremendous amount of constituent interest. The Fund supports conservation efforts benefitting these species, often in conjunction with efforts under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) to which the United States is a Party.1 The FY2007 request for the MSCF is $8.2 million, which includes the Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation Fund (NMBCF).2 This represents a 20% decrease from the FY2006 enacted level of $10.3 million for the MSCF and NMBCF, which were funded at $6.4 million and $3.9 million, respectively; and a 33% decrease in the MSCF alone. While all programs proposed under the Fund have lower requests based on their FY2006 appropriations, the Marine Turtle Conservation Fund has the largest percentage decrease (57% decrease). The NMBCF was funded as a separate program for FY2006. The President proposes to bring the NMBCF under the MSCF and to allocate $4.0 million of 1 For more information, see CRS Report RL31654, Endangered Species Act: A Primer, by Pamela Baldwin, Eugene H. Buck, and M. Lynne Corn, and CRS Report RL32751, The Convention on the International Trade of Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora: Background and Issues, by Pervaze A. Sheikh and M. Lynne Corn. Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress CRS-2 2 For recommended appropriations for the MSCF and NMBCF in the House-passed and Senatereported bill Interior and Environment Appropriations bill for FY2007, see CRS Report RL33399, Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies: FY2007 Appropriations, coordinated by Carol Hardy Vincent and Susan Boren. Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress CRS-2 appropriations, the Marine Turtle Conservation Fund has the largest percentage decrease (57% decrease). The NMBCF was funded as a separate program for FY2006. The President proposes to bring the NMBCF under the MSCF and to allocate $4.0 million of the requested $8.2 million for the MSCF to the NMBCF for FY2007. Congress rejected the proposed transfer in FY2006, as it had done in the four previous fiscal years. Table 1 shows funding levels for the MSCF and the NMBCF for FY2004-FY2006, and the requested funding level for FY2007. The MSCF is authorized under five acts, described below. The African Elephant Conservation Act (16 U.S.C. 4201) authorizes matching grants for conservation, research, management, and protection of this species. Projects are carried out in cooperation with African nations and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). The Rhinoceros and Tiger Conservation Fund (16 U.S.C. 5301) assists in conserving tigers and the 6 species of rhinos. Matching grants support governments and NGOs in projects to conserve habitat, survey populations, improve law enforcement, and educate the public. The Asian Elephant Fund (16 U.S.C. 4261) is similar to the above programs in purposes and scope. An additional emphasis, where the elephants are draft animals, is to promote their humane treatment and encourage captive breeding. The Great Ape Conservation Fund (16 U.S.C. 1603) is similar to the above programs in purposes and scope. Species of interest are lowland and mountain gorillas, chimpanzees, bonobos (a species very closely related to chimpanzees), orangutans, and the species of gibbons (Genus Hylobates — about 8-10 species, according to anthropologists). The Marine Turtle Conservation Act (16 U.S.C. 6601) was passed on July 2, 2004. This law provides grants for the conservation of marine turtle populations and their nesting habitats in the wild. This law authorizes $5 million in annual appropriations from FY2005 to FY2009 for conservation efforts and establishes a marine turtle conservation fund within the MSCF. The Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation Act (16 U.S.C. 6101-6109) provides grants for the conservation of hundreds of bird species that migrate among North and South America and the Caribbean. The act requires spending 75% of the funds on projects outside of the United States. The NMBCF is separate from the MSCF, but the Administration has proposed to make it part of the MSCF for the past four fiscal years. CRS-3 Table 1. Funding for Multinational Species Conservation Fund, FY2004-FY2006 and FY2007 Request (in U.S. $, thousands) Multinational Species Conservation Fund FY2004 Enacted FY2005 Enacted FY2006 Enacted FY2007 Requested African elephant $1,383 $1,380 $1,379 $990 Tiger and Rhinos 1,383 1,478 1,576 990 Asian elephant 1,383 1,381 1,379 990 Great Apes 1,383 1,381 1,379 990 0 99 691 297 [3,951] [3,944] [3,941] [3,960] 5,532b 5,719 6,404 4,257 Marine Turtle Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation Funda Total a. This program was first authorized in FY2002, and is not part of the MSCF, although the transfer was proposed in the President’s budgets for FY2002 - FY2007. However, because Congress has rejected the transfer four times, the program is not included in the column totals for FY2004-FY2006; and for the FY2007 request. b. Due to rounding, columns sum to slightly less than this total.