link to page 1  link to page 1 
 
Updated May 23, 2024
Social Services Block Grant
Introduction 
Table 1 shows recent TANF transfer levels, as reported in 
The Social Services Block Grant (SSBG) is a flexible 
TANF financial data published by HHS. 
funding stream used by states and territories to support a 
wide variety of social services. At the federal level, the 
Table 1. SSBG Funding History  
SSBG is administered by the U.S. Department of Health 
(nominal dol ars in bil ions) 
and Human Services (HHS). 
Fiscal 
SSBG Funding 
SSBG 
TANF 
Authorization  
Year 
Ceiling 
Appropriation 
Transfer 
Social services for certain public assistance recipients have 
2013 
$1.700 
$1.613 + $0.475 
$1.135 
been authorized under various titles of the Social Security 
Act since 1956. The SSBG, in its current form, was created 
2014 
$1.700 
$1.578 
$1.156 
in 1981 (P.L. 97-35). The SSBG is permanently authorized 
by Title XX, Subtitle A, of the Social Security Act (42 
2015 
$1.700 
$1.576 
$1.165 
U.S.C. §§1397 et seq.). 
2016 
$1.700 
$1.584 
$1.143 
Purposes 
2017 
$1.700 
$1.583 
$1.140 
Statute outlines several broad purposes for the SSBG. The 
2018 
$1.700 
$1.588 
$1.119 
purposes focus on promoting self-sufficiency; eliminating 
dependency; preventing abuse, neglect, or exploitation of 
2019 
$1.700 
$1.595 
$1,119 
children and adults; reducing inappropriate institutional 
2020 
$1.700 
$1.600 
$1.131 
care; and supporting institutional care, when appropriate. 
2021 
$1.700 
$1.603 
$1.126 
Entitlement Ceiling  
2022 
$1.700 
$1.603 
$1.136 
The SSBG is an annually appropriated capped entitlement 
to states. This means that states are entitled to their share of 
2023 
$1.700 
$1.603 
not avail. 
funding, as determined by formula, out of an amount that is 
2024 
$1.700 
$1.603 
not avail. 
capped in statute at a specific level. At its highest, the cap 
was set at $2.8 billion (FY1990-FY1995), but over time it 
Source: SSBG budget documents and TANF spending reports. SSBG 
has decreased to the current level of $1.7 billion.  
funding levels reflect sequestration. FY2013 displays annual and 
Funding History 
supplemental funds after sequestration.  
Since FY2002, annual appropriations laws have funded the 
Allocation Formula  
SSBG at its authorized level of $1.7 billion. However, 
SSBG funds are allocated to states according to the relative 
SSBG appropriations since FY2013 have been subject to 
size of each state’s population based on the most recent data 
sequestration, a spending reduction process by which 
available. Grants to Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands, 
budgetary resources are canceled to enforce budget policy 
and Northern Mariana Islands are based on their share of 
goals (see Table 1 for a recent funding history). In addition 
Title XX funds in FY1981. Grants to American Samoa are 
to annual appropriations, the SSBG has occasionally 
based on the relative size of its population compared to the 
received supplemental appropriations to assist states and 
population of the Northern Mariana Islands. 
territories in responding to natural disasters, including in 
FY2006, FY2008, and FY2013.  
Matching Requirements 
TANF Transfers 
No match is required for federal SSBG funds, and federal 
law does not specify a sub-state allocation formula.  
The Social Security Act authorizes states to transfer a 
portion of their Temporary Assistance for Needy Families 
Eligibility 
(TANF) block grants to the SSBG. The Personal 
There are no federal eligibility criteria for SSBG recipients, 
Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 
but states may set their own. One exception is that TANF 
1996 (P.L. 104-193) capped TANF transfers to the SSBG at 
10% of each state’s
law sets an income limit of 200% of the poverty level for 
 TANF allotment. Subsequent 
recipients of SSBG services funded by TANF. 
legislation (P.L. 105-178) reduced the allowable transfer to 
4.25% beginning in FY2001. However, this provision has 
State Plans and Reporting Requirements 
been superseded in every year (from FY2001 on) by 
Each year, states must submit an intended use plan to HHS, 
provisions in annual appropriations acts. These provisions 
outlining the services to be supported with the state’s SSBG 
have effectively reinstated the transfer authority to 10%. 
funds, as well as certain characteristics of the individuals to 
be served (e.g., children, adults 59 and younger, adults 60 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
 link to page 2 
Social Services Block Grant 
and older). States are also required to report annually on 
Prohibited Uses 
SSBG expenditures in various service categories defined in 
Although the SSBG is a flexible funding stream, there are 
federal regulations.   
several restrictions. The SSBG may not be used for 
Services and Expenditures  
•  construction, capital improvements, or to purchase land; 
Federal regulations issued in 1993 established uniform 
•  cash payments as a service or for costs of subsistence or 
definitions for 29 SSBG service categories, ranging from 
room and board (with limited exceptions);  
adult day care to special services for the disabled. One of 
the 29 service categories is other services. This category is 
•  payment of wages as a social service (except wages of 
defined to include services not covered by the definitions 
welfare recipients employed in providing child care); 
for the other 28 service categories. In addition to supporting 
•  the provision of most types of medical care (except for 
social services in these 29 categories, states may use SSBG 
family planning, rehabilitation, initial detoxification, or 
funds for administration, planning, evaluation, and training.  
medical care provided as an “integral but subordinate 
component of a social service”); 
Figure 1 displays total FY2021 SSBG expenditures (the 
most recent available) by service category. Spending is 
•  educational services provided by public schools;  
shown in millions of dollars and as a percentage of all 
•  child care that does not meet state or local standards; 
expenditures. The figure breaks out spending in the six 
largest service categories (in dollar terms), along with 
•  services provided by individuals excluded from 
reported state spending on administrative costs. Remaining 
participation in Medicare or certain other programs; or  
expenditures are consolidated into a category for all other 
•  services related to assisted suicide. 
services, which encompasses spending in 23 discrete 
service categories, ranging from counseling services to 
Waiver Authority 
congregate meals. The figure also breaks out spending from 
In limited circumstances, the law permits HHS to waive the 
SSBG allocations and from TANF transfers to the SSBG. In 
prohibitions on using SSBG funds for (1) the purchase of 
FY2021, the six largest service categories (in dollar terms) 
land, construction, or capital improvements, or (2) medical 
combined to account for two-thirds of all spending. 
care. HHS may waive these limitations at a state’s request, 
Figure 1. FY2021 SSBG Expenditures by Category 
provided HHS determines that the state’s circumstances are 
extraordinary and that permitting the waiver will contribute 
to the state’s ability to carry out the purposes of the SSBG.  
Selected SSBG Proposals  
Over the years, there have been proposals to reduce or 
eliminate funding for the SSBG. For instance, in the 114th 
Congress the House Ways and Means Committee reported 
out a bill (H.R. 4724) to repeal the SSBG. In the 112th 
Congress, a bill containing similar provisions (H.R. 5652) 
passed the House, but the measure was not taken up in the 
Senate. There were also calls to repeal the SSBG in the 
  112th, 113th, 114th, and 115th Congresses associated with 
Source: Prepared using data from the FY2021 SSBG Annual Report. 
budget resolutions adopted by the House, and as part of the 
Percentages may not sum due to rounding. In this figure, All Other 
House Budget Committee’s July 2014 discussion draft, 
Services comprises 23 discrete SSBG service categories (including 
Expanding Opportunity in America.  
spending in the other services category). 
Proponents of eliminating the SSBG have argued that it is a 
Recipients 
duplicative funding stream lacking accountability and 
In FY2021, an estimated 20.9 million recipients received 
evidence of effectiveness. Similar arguments were made by 
services that were funded at least partially by the SSBG. 
the Trump and George W. Bush Administrations in 
This is 8% fewer recipients than in FY2020 and 30% fewer 
proposing, as part of certain budget requests (FY2018-
than in FY2014 (the peak in recent years). About 46% of all 
FY2020 and FY2007-FY2009), to reduce or eliminate 
service recipients in FY2021 were children. (An individual 
SSBG funding. However, others have argued eliminating 
who received multiple SSBG-supported services may be 
the SSBG might adversely affect the vulnerable populations 
counted as a unique recipient for each service received.) 
currently being served, noting that the flexible nature of the 
SSBG allows states to respond to local and state-specific 
FY2021 annual report data show that more than half (53%) 
needs. The Obama Administration had proposed in two 
of the recipients of SSBG-supported services in that year 
budget requests (FY2016-FY2017) to set aside a portion of 
fell into the following four service categories: information 
SSBG funding for evaluation. None of these budget 
and referral (3.7 million people, 18% of all recipients), 
proposals have been enacted. 
child protective services (2.7 million people, 13% of 
recipients), child care (2.7 million people, 13% of 
Karen E. Lynch, Specialist in Social Policy   
recipients), and case management (1.9 million people, 9% 
of recipients). 
IF10115
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
Social Services Block Grant 
 
 
Disclaimer 
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to 
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. 
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has 
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the 
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be 
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include 
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you 
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 
 
https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF10115 · VERSION 8 · UPDATED