link to page 2 
Updated May 15, 2024
The Army’s M-10 Booker (Formerly Known as Mobile
Protected Firepower [MPF]) System
What Is the Mobile Protected Firepower
(MPF) System?
Middle Tier Acquisition (MTA) according to the Defense
Acquisition University is a rapid acquisition approach that
The Army’s MPF system is intended to address an
focuses on delivering capability in a period of 2 to 5 years. The
operational shortfall in infantry units:
authority to use MTA was granted by Congress in Section 804
Currently the Army’s Infantry Brigade Combat
of the FY2016 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)
Teams (IBCT) do not have a combat vehicle
(P.L. 114-92). Programs using MTA are not subject to the Joint
Capabilities Integration Development System (JCIDS) and
assigned that is capable of providing mobile,
provisions of Department of Defense (DOD) Directive
protected, direct, offensive fire capability.... The
5000.01 “Defense Acquisition System.” MTA consists of
MPF solution is an integration of existing mature
utilizing two acquisition pathways: (1) Rapid Prototyping,
technologies
and
components
that
avoids
which is to streamline the testing and development of
development which would lengthen the program
prototypes, and (2) Rapid Fielding, which is to upgrade existing
schedule.
systems with already proven technologies.
Operationally, the Army wants the MPF to be able to
On December 17, 2018, the Army awarded two Section 804
[n]eutralize enemy prepared positions and bunkers
MTA Rapid Prototyping contracts for MPF. The two
and defeat heavy machine guns and armored
companies awarded contracts were General Dynamic Land
vehicle threats during offensive operations or when
Systems (GDLS), Inc. (Sterling Heights, MI) and BAE
conducting defensive operations against attacking
Systems Land and Armaments, LP (Sterling Heights, MI).
enemies.
Each MTA Rapid Prototyping contract was not to exceed
$376 million. The MTA Rapid Prototyping contracts
In terms of the Army’s overall procurement plans for MPF,
required delivery of 12 preproduction vehicles (from each
[t]he Army Acquisition Objective (AAO) for MPF
vendor) for developmental and operational testing, and a
is 504 vehicles, with 14 MPFs per IBCT. The
Soldier Vehicle Assessment (SVA).
targeted fielding for the First Unit Equipped (FUE)
M-10 Program Status
is Fiscal Year (FY) 2025.
The SVA reportedly began in January 2021 at Ft. Liberty,
MPF Redesignated as the M-10 Booker
NC—without the BAE prototypes because of production
On June 14, 2023, the Army announced the redesignation
challenges—with testing running through June 2021. While
of the MPF as the M-10 Booker infantry assault vehicle.
BAE was unable to provide prototypes at the beginning of
According to the Army:
testing, prototypes were eventually provided to the Army
for testing. During the assessment, soldiers evaluated
The vehicle platform honors two enlisted Army
GDLS and BAE M-10 prototypes in a variety of operational
soldiers who served our nation selflessly during
scenarios.
times of great conflict – Medal of Honor recipient
MPF Low-Rate Initial Production (LRIP)
Private. Robert D. Booker, who perished in World
Contract Awarded
War II, and Distinguished Service Cross recipient
On June 28, 2022, the Army announced the award of a
Staff Sergeant Stevon A. Booker, who died from
$1.14 billion contract to GDLS for the production and
injuries sustained in Operation Iraqi Freedom.
fielding of up to 96 M-10 systems (Figure 1). Delivery of
M-10 Acquisition Strategy
the first LRIP M-10 system was expected in 19 months, and
In November 2017, the Army issued a Request for Proposal
Initial Operational Testing and Evaluation was planned for
(RFP) for the Engineering and Manufacturing Development
the end of FY2024. The first unit equipped is scheduled for
(EMD) phase and, in order to maximize competition,
the fourth quarter of FY2025, consisting of a battalion of 42
planned to award up to two Middle Tier Acquisition (MTA)
M-10s. Each LRIP M-10 system is expected to cost about
contracts for the EMD phase in early FY2019.
$12.8 million. Full-Rate Production M-10 systems are
expected to cost less than LRIP variants and may include
modifications based on Operational Testing and Evaluation
results.
Future M-10 Fielding
The Army’s M-10 acquisition objective is for 504 systems,
with Army officials reportedly noting that this number
https://crsreports.congress.gov
The Army’s M-10 Booker (Formerly Known as Mobile Protected Firepower [MPF]) System
could vary “slightly.” Under current Army plans, four M-10
FY2025 M-10 Budgetary Information
battalions are to be fielded by 2030, with the bulk of the
planned acquisition scheduled to be completed by 2035.
Table 1. FY2025 M-10 Budget Request
Funding
Total Request
Total Request
Category
($M)
(Qty.)
Low-Rate Initial Production (LRIP) is a programmatic
decision made when manufacturing development is completed
RDT&E
$48.1
—
and there is an ability to produce a small-quantity set of
Procurement
$460.6
33
articles.
Source: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense
Full-Rate Production (FRP) is a decision that allows for
(Comptrol er)/Chief Financial Officer, Program Acquisition Cost by
government contracting for economic production quantities
Weapon System, United States Department of Defense Fiscal Year 2025
fol owing stabilization of the system design and validation of
Budget Request, March 2024, p. 3-8.
the production process.
Notes: RDT&E = Research, Development, Test & Evaluation; $M =
U.S. dol ars in mil ions; Qty. = FY2025 procurement quantities.
Figure 1. GDLS M-10 Variant
According to DOD, FY2025 funds requested for the M-10
are intended to
[f]und completion of Booker [M-10] LRIP Phase
developmental and operational testing, production
of the initial FRP lot of 33 vehicles, maintenance of
system software, monitoring of potential system
obsolescence, engineering changes, management of
the Booker Technical Data Package (TDP), and
fielding of LRIP vehicles to the Booker First Unit
Equipped (FUE).
Source: General Dynamics, “General Dynamics Land Systems Wins
Considerations for Congress
U.S. Army Competition for Mobile Protected Firepower Vehicles,”
Oversight questions Congress could consider include the
June 29, 2022.
following.
FY2022 Director, Operational Test and
Evaluation Report
2024 Army Force Structure Transformation and
In January 2023, the Department of Defense’s Director,
M-10 Units
Operational Test and Evaluation Report (DOT&E) issued
Reportedly, the Army is planning to create MPF battalions.
its annual report on the previous fiscal year’s test and
From these battalions, MPF companies would then be
evaluation activities. The report notes the M-10’s progress
allocated to IBCTs. On February 27, 2024, the Army
toward achieving operational effectiveness is “satisfactory.”
announced “changes to its force structure that will
The report also noted, “Developmental testing found the M-
modernize and continue to transform the service to better
face future threats.” While the Army mentions the creation
10 had high levels of toxic fumes when firing the main gun,
requiring modifications to crew procedures during firing to
of a number of units based on modernization programs, no
mitigate the build-up of fumes in the turret.” DOT&E
mention is made of M-10 units. Considering the M-10 is a
recommended the Army “continue implementing system
major modernization effort currently procuring systems, it
design fixes to reduce the high level of toxic fumes when
seems inconsistent that the Army would not include M-10
firing the main gun.” DOT&E further recommended the
units in its 2024 Force Structure Transformation White
Army “continue improving the vehicle’s cooling system to
Paper. Given this apparent omission, Congress might seek
reduce preventative maintenance checks and services times
clarification with senior Army leadership on the status of
required.”
M-10 procurement and fielding to units.
M-10 Testing
Basing M-10 Units
Reportedly, the M-10 is scheduled to begin a series of tests
There are concerns about suitable storage and maintenance
to determine what modifications may be needed prior to full
facilities and training ranges for M-10 units assigned to
rate production. In early July 2024, soldiers at Ft. Liberty,
infantry posts not structured to accommodate armored
NC, are scheduled to begin new equipment training lasting
fighting vehicles. A possible solution might be to station M-
through August or September 2024. If training is
10 units at bases better suited to support armor units, but the
successful, in early January 2025, the M-10 is to be sent to
Army reportedly would like to keep M-10 units within at
an Initial Operational Test and Evaluation (IOT&E) event
least a six-hour drive from the division they are assigned to.
to determine what near-term and long-term changes GDLS
Another issue is that there might be related challenges in
will need to make to the system. The IOT&E test event, if
creating M-10 units in the Army National Guard. Given
successful, could result in a FRP decision in the April to
these M-10 unit-related considerations, Congress might also
monitor the Army’s progress in addressing the
June 2025 timeframe. Also, reportedly, in response to
DOT&E’s January 2023 report, the Army and GDLS “have
aforementioned challenges in creating new M-10 units.
worked on several vehicle fixes including two larger items:
Andrew Feickert, Specialist in Military Ground Forces
toxic fumes and cooling.”
IF11859
https://crsreports.congress.gov
The Army’s M-10 Booker (Formerly Known as Mobile Protected Firepower [MPF]) System
Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress.
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.
https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF11859 · VERSION 12 · UPDATED