Legal Requirements for Section 501(c)(3)
April 15, 2024
Hospitals
Edward C. Liu
It is estimated that approximately half of private, community hospitals are non-profit
Legislative Attorney
organizations, which may be eligible for federal income tax exemption as charitable

organizations under § 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C.). To qualify for such tax-
exemption, hospitals must satisfy two distinct hospital-specific tests, in addition to the general

requirements applicable to all § 501(c)(3) organizations.
First, a hospital claiming charitable organization status must meet the “community benefit” standard, as described in two
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) revenue rulings issued in 1969 and 1983. The community benefit standard generally asks
whether the hospital promotes the health of a broad class of individuals in the community that it serves based on all relevant
factors and circumstances. While the provision of free or reduced-cost care or the operation of an emergency room that is
open to all are two examples of ways in which a hospital may provide a community benefit, these examples are not the only
types of benefits that meet that standard. Other types of community benefits that the IRS has acknowledged include
reinvesting revenues to expand facilities, improve patient care, and conduct medical training, education, and research.
Although the IRS has not specified a particular amount or percentage of community benefit that is required to qualify as a
charitable § 501(c)(3) hospital, it does require such hospitals to provide annual public reports in Schedule H to Form 990 on
various metrics that are related to community benefit, such as the amount of free or reduced-cost care provided, expenditures
toward other community building activities, and reimbursement shortfalls from government health care programs.
Separately from the community benefit standard, § 501(r) of the I.R.C. requires § 501(c)(3) hospitals to conduct a triennial
community health needs assessment, to have written financial assistance and emergency medical care policies, to limit
charges for persons who qualify for financial assistance to amounts generally billed to insured patients, and to refrain from
extraordinary billing and collection actions. Failure to comply with these requirements may subject a hospital to loss of its
tax-exempt status, the assessment of an annual excise tax, or taxation of income derived from noncompliant hospital
facilities.
Congressional Research Service

Legal Requirements for Section 501(c)(3) Hospitals

n 2022, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) reported that almost half of
all Medicare-enrolled hospitals were private, non-profit organizations.1 Such non-profit
I hospitals may qualify as tax-exempt charitable organizations under § 501(c)(3) of the Internal
Revenue Code (I.R.C.).2 In addition to exemption from corporate income taxes, tax-exempt
hospitals also benefit from eligibility to receive tax-deductible donations and special bond
financing.3 The requirements hospitals must meet to qualify as charitable have also been the
subject of recent congressional and media attention.4
To be federally tax-exempt, private non-profit hospitals must meet the general requirements
applicable to all § 501(c)(3) organizations.5 Hospitals are also subject to hospital-specific
requirements arising from two separate provisions of the I.R.C. First, private non-profit hospitals
must meet the “community benefit” standard, as described in multiple Revenue Rulings issued by
the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), to be considered charitable organizations under I.R.C. §
501(c)(3). Second, such hospitals must also comply with specific requirements under I.R.C. §
501(r) added by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA).6 This report describes the
regulatory and legislative development of the hospital-specific requirements imposed under both
of these statutes.
Definition of “Charitable” Under Section 501(c)(3)
Section 501(c)(3) of the I.R.C. provides tax-exempt status for “charitable” organizations but does
not define “charitable.”7 U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury) regulations provide that the
term should be used in “its generally accepted legal sense” and provide examples, including the
relief of the poor or unprivileged; the promotion of social welfare; and the advancement of

1 U.S. DEP’T OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR PLANNING AND EVALUATION, OWNERSHIP
OF HOSPITALS: AN ANALYSIS OF NEWLY-RELEASED FEDERAL DATA & A METHOD FOR ASSESSING COMMON OWNERS 4
(Aug. 2023), https://aspe.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/documents/582de65f285646af741e14f82b6df1f6/hospital-
ownership-data-brief.pdf. See also, U.S. GOV’T ACCOUNTABILITY OFF., GAO-20-679, TAX ADMINISTRATION:
OPPORTUNITIES EXIST TO IMPROVE OVERSIGHT OF HOSPITALS’ TAX-EXEMPT STATUS 1 (2020) (citing American Hospital
Association, Fast Facts on U.S. Hospitals, 2020) (“Slightly more than half of the community hospitals in the United
States are private, non-profit organizations.”).
2 Simon v. E. Ky. Welfare Rights Org., 426 U.S. 26, 29 (1976) (citing 26 U.S.C. § 501(c)(3), which does not mention
hospitals specifically, but provides income tax-exemption for “organizations operated exclusively for religious,
charitable, scientific, testing for public safety, literary, or educational purposes”). Federal tax-exemption is distinct
from non-profit organization under state law, which may impose additional requirements on non-profit hospitals. E.g.,
FLA. STAT. § 617.2002(2) (2024) (requiring non-profit hospitals to participate in Medicaid and provide charity care).
Because this report is focused on federal requirements for tax-exemption, such state laws are beyond the scope of this
report.
3 26 U.S.C. §§ 145, 170.
4 See STAFF OF S. COMM. ON HEALTH, EDUCATION, LABOR, AND PENSIONS, 118TH CONG., MAJ. REP. ON EXECUTIVE
CHARITY: MAJOR NON-PROFIT HOSPITALS TAKE ADVANTAGE OF TAX BREAKS AND PRIORITIZE CEO PAY OVER HELPING
PATIENTS AFFORD MEDICAL CARE (Oct. 10, 2023); Jessica Silver-Greenberg & Katie Thomas, They Were Entitled to
Free Care. Hospitals Hounded Them to Pay., N.Y. TIMES (Sept. 24, 2022),
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/24/business/nonprofit-hospitals-poor-patients.html; Tax-Exempt Hospitals and the
Community Benefit Standard: Hearing Before the H. Ways & Means Comm., 118th Cong. (2023).
5 For more information about general requirements for all § 501(c)(3) organizations, see CRS Testimony TE10090,
Growth of the Tax-Exempt Sector and the Impact on the American Political Landscape, by Justin C. Chung (2023); and
CRS Report RL33377, Tax-Exempt Organizations Under Internal Revenue Code Section 501(c): Political Activity
Restrictions, by Justin C. Chung (2024).
6 Pub. L. No. 111-148, § 9007(a), 124 Stat. 855.
7 26 U.S.C. § 501(c)(3).
Congressional Research Service

1

Legal Requirements for Section 501(c)(3) Hospitals

education, religion, and science.8 In the absence of explicit statutory or regulatory requirements
specifically applying the term “charitable” to hospitals, IRS has provided guidance principally
through revenue rulings describing the criteria it uses to determine whether hospitals qualify as §
501(c)(3) charitable organizations. The IRS currently uses a “community benefit” standard to
evaluate whether a hospital qualifies as a § 501(c)(3) charitable organization, which is discussed
in the following section.9
Evolution of the “Community Benefit” Standard
The standard used by the IRS to evaluate whether a private hospital is charitable has evolved over
the past seventy years, originating with a “charity care” standard that has been replaced by the
current “community benefit” standard. Revenue Ruling 56-185, issued by the IRS in 1956,
established the charity care standard.10 Under that ruling, to qualify as a charitable § 501(c)(3)
entity, a hospital could not be operated exclusively for those who were expected and able to pay,
and was required to provide, to the extent of its financial ability, free or below-cost care to
patients who were unable to pay for their care.11 The ruling further stated that, if a hospital
expects full payment for services rendered, it cannot subsequently claim that it provided charity
care merely because some patients ultimately failed to pay.12
In 1969, the IRS issued Revenue Ruling 69-545, which expressly eliminated the 1956 ruling’s
requirement that a hospital provide free or below-cost care to qualify as a charitable § 501(c)(3)
organization.13 Under the standard developed in Revenue Ruling 69-545, which has come to be
known as the “community benefit standard,” hospitals seeking to qualify as charitable § 501(c)(3)
entities are judged on whether they promote the health of a broad class of individuals in the
community.14 The IRS reasoned that the promotion of health is a charitable purpose when it
benefits the community as a whole, even though not all community members (such as indigent
people) may benefit.15 As such, the IRS concluded that a hospital with a full-time emergency
room that provided care to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay, qualified for § 501(c)(3)
charitable status even though the hospital otherwise only admitted individuals who could pay for
the services (by themselves, through private insurance, or through public programs such as
Medicare).16

8 Treas. Reg. § 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(2) (as amended in 2017).
9 See Geisinger Health Plan v. Comm’r, 985 F.2d 1210, 1214 (3rd Cir. 1993) (upholding IRS’s denial of a hospital’s
application for tax-exempt status based on failure to meet the “community benefit” standard) and St. David’s Health
Care Sys. v. United States, 349 F.3d 232, 234 (5th Cir. 2003) (reviewing IRS’s revocation of tax-exempt status
following audit). Hospitals apply for tax-exempt status through the filing of Form 1023, which provides a means for a
hospital to describe how its tax-exempt activities qualify as charitable. See IRS, About Form 1023, Application for
Recognition of Exemption Under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, https://www.irs.gov/forms-
pubs/about-form-1023 (last visited Feb. 15, 2024).
10 Rev. Rul. 56-185, 1956-1 C.B. 202.
11 See id.
12 See id.
13 Rev. Rul. 69-545, 1969-2 C.B. 117.
14 See id.
15 See id. (citing to RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF TRUSTS §§ 368, 372 (1959); IV SCOTT ON TRUSTS §§ 368, 372 (3d ed.
1967)).
16 Id. Other characteristics of the hospital that the IRS highlighted included the following: its surplus funds were used to
improve patient care, expand hospital facilities, and advance medical training, education, and research; it was
controlled by a board of trustees that consisted of independent civic leaders; and hospital privileges were available to
all qualified physicians. See id.
Congressional Research Service

2

Legal Requirements for Section 501(c)(3) Hospitals

While a significant factor in Revenue Ruling 69-545 was that the hospital operated an emergency
room open to everyone, in 1983 the IRS issued Revenue Ruling 83-157, which clarified that a
hospital without an emergency room may still qualify as a § 501(c)(3) entity under the
community benefit standard.17 In Revenue Ruling 83-157, the IRS recognized there are
circumstances in which hospitals may not need to operate emergency rooms, such as when a state
agency has determined that such operation would be duplicative or when a hospital is in a
specialized field (such as a cancer or eye hospital) unlikely to require emergency care.18 In these
situations, a hospital may still meet the community benefit standard for § 501(c)(3) eligibility by
demonstrating other evidence of hospital-provided benefits that promote the health of a broad
class of persons.19 Factors that may be used as evidence of meeting the community benefit
standard include a board of directors chosen from members of the community; an open medical
staff policy (i.e., allowing a broad group of physicians in the community to treat patients at the
hospital); treatment of patients using public programs (e.g., Medicare and Medicaid); and using
surplus funds for improving patient care, facilities, equipment, and medical training, education,
and research.20
Following the shift to the community benefit standard in 1969, several individual and
organizational plaintiffs sued, challenging the IRS’s authority to eliminate the prior charity care
standard.21 That challenge was ultimately dismissed by the Supreme Court, which held that
plaintiffs lacked standing because the claimed loss of indigent access to non-emergency medical
services was not traceable to the revenue ruling.22 The Court also explained that the relief sought
by the plaintiffs (rescinding the community benefit standard revenue ruling) would not
necessarily redress the loss of medical services for indigent populations because hospitals could
independently forgo tax-exempt status.23 Subsequently, lower courts have continued to apply the
community benefit standard as described in both Revenue Rulings 69-545 and 83-157 when
evaluating IRS’s denials of tax-exemption for hospitals.24
Schedule H to Form 990
Tax-exempt § 501(c)(3) organizations are generally required to file an annual information return
(Form 990 series) with the IRS.25 The form asks for information on a variety of topics, including
income, expenses, assets, officers and employees, and activities related to the organization’s basis
for tax-exempt status. The Form 990 is generally due on the 15th day of the fifth month after the

17 Rev. Rul. 83-157, 1983-2 C.B. 94.
18 See id.
19 See id.
20 See id.
21 Simon v. E. Ky. Welfare Rights Org., 426 U.S. 26 (1976).
22 Id. at 42–43. Prior to dismissal at the Supreme Court, the appellate court had held that the IRS had permissibly
interpreted the term “charitable” when issuing Revenue Ruling 69-545. E. Ky. Welfare Rights Org. v. Simon, 506 F.2d
1278, 1290 (D.C. Cir. 1974), vacated, 426 U.S. at 46.
23 Simon, 426 U.S. at 43.
24 E.g., IHC Health Plans, Inc. v. Comm’r, 325 F.3d 1188, 1198–99 (10th Cir. 2003); St. David’s Health Care Sys. v.
U.S., 349 F.3d 232, 235–36 (5th Cir. 2003); Geisinger Health Plan v. Comm’r, 985 F.2d 1210, 1217 (3rd Cir. 1993).
25 26 U.S.C. § 6033. There are exceptions for small entities and houses of worship, among others. See id. The penalty
for failure to file the return is $20 per day for each day the failure continues, which is increased to $100 per day if the
organization has annual gross receipts exceeding $1 million in any year. See id. at § 6652(c)(1)(A). The maximum
penalty is $50,000 for entities exceeding $1 million in gross receipts, and is the lesser of $10,000 or 5% of gross
receipts for all others. See id. The hospital’s managers may also be subject to penalty. See id. at § 6652(c)(1)(B).
Congressional Research Service

3

link to page 7 link to page 7 link to page 7 link to page 7 Legal Requirements for Section 501(c)(3) Hospitals

close of an entity’s tax year (May 15 for calendar-year organizations), although an entity may
seek an extension.
In 2007, amid continued concerns about “whether there [were] differences between for-profit and
tax-exempt hospitals,”26 the IRS announced that hospitals would be required to provide additional
information specific to their industry on a new Schedule H to Form 990.27 The IRS drafted
Schedule H to “combat the lack of transparency surrounding the activities of tax-exempt
organizations that provide hospital or medical care.”28 Schedule H divides the information to be
reported into six parts.29
Part I: Quantifying “Community Benefit”
Part I of Schedule H attempts to quantify the amount of community benefit provided by hospitals
on an annual basis.30 Expenses that are reportable in Part I include free care, unreimbursed
Medicaid, unreimbursed costs from other means-tested government programs, community health
improvement services, health professions education, subsidized health services, research, and
contributions to other community groups.31 The IRS has not suggested a minimum level of
expenditures that would be required to justify tax-exemption.
Part II: Community Building Activities
Part II quantifies the hospital’s community building activities. Although the definition of
“community building” may not be obvious at first glance, it is generally understood to refer to
programs that are intended to have a beneficial impact upon the health of a community but that do
not provide medical care. Examples of community building are housing improvements, economic
development, community support, environmental improvements, leadership development,
coalition building, community health improvement advocacy, and workforce development.32
Despite the inclusion of community building metrics on the Schedule H, these numbers are still
separate from the reporting of charity care and community benefit expenditures in Part I. The IRS
commentary on the Schedule’s final draft reflected the view that the link between community

26 IRS, DRAFT FORM 990 REDESIGN PROJECT - SCHEDULE H: INSTRUCTIONS 1 (June 14, 2007) [hereinafter JUNE 14
DRAFT COMMENTS], http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-tege/draftform990redesign_schh_instr.pdf. Schedule H was based on
responses to questionnaires IRS sent to approximately 600 large hospitals regarding their billing practices, emergency
room availability, compensation, and what types of community benefit they provided. See IRS, FORM 13790:
COMPLIANCE CHECK QUESTIONNAIRE TAX-EXEMPT HOSPITALS, http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-tege/
exhibit_1__form13790.pdf (last visited Apr. 10, 2024). The IRS issued a final report on the compliance project, see
IRS, IRS EXEMPT ORGANIZATIONS (TE/GE) HOSPITAL COMPLIANCE PROJECT FINAL REPORT, http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-
tege/frepthospproj.pdf (last visited Apr. 10, 2024). See also IRS FSA 01-10-030 (Feb. 5, 2001) (addressing whether a
hospital’s stated policies to provide health care services to the indigent are sufficient to satisfy the community benefit
standard).
27 Press Release, IRS Releases Final 2008 Form 990 for Tax-Exempt Organizations, Adjusts Filing Threshold to
Provide Transition Relief (Dec. 20, 2007) [hereinafter Dec. 20 Draft Highlights], https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-news/ir-
07-204.pdf. The new Schedule H is part of a significant redesign of the entire Form 990.
28 JUNE 14 DRAFT COMMENTS, supra note 26, at 1.
29 IRS, Schedule H (Form 990): Hospitals (2023) [hereinafter Schedule H], https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f990sh.pdf
(last visited Apr. 10, 2024).
30 JUNE 14 DRAFT COMMENTS, supra note 26, at 1.
31 Schedule H, supra note 29, at Part I.
32 Schedule H, supra note 29, at Part II.
Congressional Research Service

4

link to page 7 link to page 7 link to page 7 link to page 7 link to page 7 link to page 7 Legal Requirements for Section 501(c)(3) Hospitals

building and health was still tenuous and that the reporting tools in Schedule H are intended to
operate, in part, as data collection methods for the IRS to discern what links exist.33
Part III: Medicare Shortfalls and Bad Debt
Hospitals incur costs when treating all patients, including patients who are covered by Medicare.
Medicare, however, may not reimburse a provider for the total cost of services received by a
patient.34 The difference between the Medicare reimbursement rates and the costs incurred by a
hospital are called shortfalls. Schedule H includes a dedicated area in which to report Medicare
shortfalls. Despite the addition of Part III, the IRS does not appear to automatically treat
Medicare shortfalls as a direct measure of community benefit. Instead, hospitals are asked to
“[d]escribe ... the extent to which any shortfall reported [in Part III] should be treated as
community benefit.”35
Hospitals regularly engage in billing and collection practices to recoup co-pays, deductibles, and
other expenses from patients. The collection process may eventually reach a point at which it
becomes apparent that a debt owed to the hospital has little or no potential of repayment. In
accordance with generally accepted accounting practices, it is customary to “write off” these
debts as “bad debt.”36 Schedule H allows hospitals to report bad debt in Part III alongside
Medicare shortfalls, but bad debt expense may not be reported on the charity care and community
benefit table in Part I.37 As with Medicare shortfalls, filing hospitals must explain what portion of
bad debt should be considered community benefit.38 The IRS comments accompanying the
Schedule’s final draft indicated that it does not intend to consider any portion of bad debt a de
facto community benefit, citing a lack of consensus regarding bad debt policies among
hospitals.39
Part IV: Management Companies and Joint Ventures
Part IV requires disclosure of any joint ventures in which a hospital participates. Part IV of
Schedule H asks tax-exempt entities that operate hospitals to list the joint ventures in which they
participate. Joint ventures can present challenges in the non-profit health care context for a
variety of reasons. If physicians with staff privileges at the hospital also have a proprietary
interest in the joint venture, referrals to that joint venture may violate federal prohibitions against
self-referrals or kickbacks.40 If directors or trustees of the hospital have a proprietary interest in
that joint venture, the non-profit status of the hospital could be jeopardized by any benefit they
receive as a result of their interest in the venture.41 Similarly, in St. David’s Health Care System v.

33 Dec. 20 Draft Highlights, supra note 27, at 4.
34 For further information about Medicare benefits and payments, including applicable patient cost sharing—
deductibles, coinsurance—see CRS Report R40425, Medicare Primer (2020).
35 Schedule H, supra note 29, at Part III (emphasis added).
36 Under Medicare, hospitals may receive payments that cover a portion of Medicare “bad debt”—unpaid Medicare
patient deductibles and coinsurance that are written off as uncollectible after reasonable collection efforts have been
made. See 42 C.F.R. § 413.89(e) (2023) and 42 C.F.R. § 413.89(h).
37 Schedule H, supra note 29, at Part III; JUNE 14 DRAFT COMMENTS, supra note 26, at 3.
38 Schedule H, supra note 29, at Part III.
39 Dec. 20 Draft Highlights, supra note 27, at 3.
40 For a more detailed discussion of physician self-referral and federal law, see CRS Report RS22743, Health Care
Fraud and Abuse Laws Affecting Medicare and Medicaid: An Overview, by Jennifer A. Staman.
41 Under 26 U.S.C. § 501(c)(3), the net earnings of a charitable organization may not flow to the benefit of any private
shareholder or individual.
Congressional Research Service

5

link to page 7 link to page 7 link to page 7 Legal Requirements for Section 501(c)(3) Hospitals

United States, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that a joint venture’s profit
motive could undermine a non-profit partner’s status as a charitable organization.42
Part V: Facility Information
Part V requests information about the entity’s health care facilities, including questions about
compliance with the ACA’s requirements, discussed below. Organizations are asked, in Part V of
Schedule H, to identify all hospital or medical care facilities and to indicate the types of medical
services provided by each. The definition of hospital or medical care does not include assisted
living services, vocational training for the disabled, or medical education and research.43
Part VI: Supplemental Information
Part VI of Schedule H provides an area in which to provide narrative information regarding the
amount of community benefit provided. The IRS stated that this area could be used to justify why
some portion of Medicare shortfall or bad debt reported in other areas of the Schedule should be
considered community benefit.44 In addition, hospitals may provide details about other
community benefits they provide that are not easily quantifiable.45
Section 501(r) Requirements
During the 109th and 110th Congresses, both the House Ways & Means Committee and the
Senate Finance Committee held hearings examining the benefits provided by tax-exempt
hospitals and considered legislative reforms that would have required such hospitals to provide
minimum amounts of charity care.46 Although neither of these legislative proposals were
ultimately enacted, in 2010, Congress enacted Section 9007 of the ACA, which added a new
I.R.C. § 501(r) that imposes four additional requirements hospitals must meet to qualify for
§ 501(c)(3) status.47 These requirements are in addition to such hospitals meeting the community
benefit standard, as described in the previous section, although there is some overlap between the
two sets of requirements. Section 501(r) requires § 501(c)(3) hospitals to meet the following
requirements:

42 St. David’s Health Care System v. United States, 349 F.3d 232, 237 (5th Cir. 2003).
43 JUNE 14 DRAFT COMMENTS, supra note 26, at 8.
44 Dec. 20 Draft Highlights, supra note 27, at 5.
45 Id.; see also Schedule H, supra note 29, at Part VI (describing a hospital’s open medical staff policy or community
board as examples of community benefit that can be reported in this part).
46 See H.R. 6420, Tax Exempt Hospitals Responsibility Act of 2006; Senate Finance Committee Minority Staff, Tax-
Exempt Hospitals: Discussion Draft (2007), https://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/prg071907a.pdf; Hearing
on the Tax-Exempt Hospital Sector before the H. Ways & Means Comm., 109th Cong. (2005); Taking the Pulse of
Charitable Care and Community Benefits at Nonprofit Hospitals: Hearing before the S. Finance Comm., 109th Cong.
(2006).
47 Pub. L. No. 111-148, § 9007, 124 Stat. 855 (codified at 26 U.S.C. §§ 501(r), 4959, 6033(b)(15)). There are three
possible consequences for failing to comply with the § 501(r) requirements: (1) the hospital may have its § 501(c)(3)
status revoked; (2) if the IRS determines that revocation of § 501(c)(3) status is not appropriate for a hospital with
multiple facilities, the hospital will be subject to tax on the income of any noncompliant facility; and (3) if the hospital
fails to comply with the community health needs assessment requirement, it is subject to a $50,000 excise tax for each
taxable year the failure occurs. 26 U.S.C. §§ 501(r)(1), (2)(B), 4959; Treas. Reg. § 1.501(r)-2 (2015).
Congressional Research Service

6

Legal Requirements for Section 501(c)(3) Hospitals

• Hospitals must conduct a “community health needs assessment” (CHNA) at least
once every three years and adopt an implementation strategy to meet those
needs.48
• Hospitals must have written financial assistance and emergency medical care
policies.49
• For emergency and other medically necessary care, hospitals may not charge
individuals eligible under the financial assistance policy more than the amounts
generally billed for care provided to those with insurance coverage. For all other
medical care, hospitals must charge such patients less than the gross charges (i.e.,
the full, established prices before any discounts, contractual allowances, or
deductions are applied) for such care.50
• Hospitals must make reasonable efforts to determine whether an individual is
eligible for financial assistance before beginning extraordinary collection
actions.51
Treasury regulations issued in 2014 and 2015 have provided further guidance on the scope and
definitions used for each of the four § 501(r) requirements, which are discussed in more detail in
the following sections. Additionally, Section 9006 requires the Treasury Secretary to review, at
least once every three years, the community benefit activities of any tax-exempt hospital.52 Since
the enactment of § 501(r), the IRS has also issued a handful of private letter rulings revoking the
tax-exempt status of hospitals for failing to meet the new ACA requirements.53 With the exception
of one case in which the hospital failure was limited to adequately publicizing its CHNA
(discussed in more detail below), the IRS found that these hospitals were generally not aware of
their obligations under § 501(r).54 Therefore, these cases provide little further guidance regarding
these requirements.
Community Health Needs Assessment
The CHNA required under § 501(r)(3) must have been conducted by a § 501(c)(3) hospital in the
current or preceding two tax years. The CHNA must also be made publicly available and be
developed after considering input from persons representing the broad interests of the community,
including those with public health knowledge or expertise and the views of medically
underserved, low-income, and minority populations within the community. Additionally, hospitals
must adopt an implementation strategy responding to the CHNA that describes how the needs
identified are being met and explain why any identified needs are not being addressed.55
Hospitals have some discretion to define the community they serve for purposes of conducting
the triennial CHNA. Treasury regulations provide that a hospital may define its community based
on the geographical area it serves, the characteristics of target populations (such as children,

48 See 26 U.S.C. § 501(r)(1)(A), (3); Treas. Reg. § 1.501(r)-3 (2015).
49 See 26 U.S.C. § 501(r)(1)(B), (4); Treas. Reg. § 1.501(r)-4 (2015).
50 See 26 U.S.C. § 501(r)(1)(C), (5); Treas. Reg. § 1.501(r)-5 (2015).
51 See 26 U.S.C. § 501(r)(1)(D), (6); Treas. Reg. § 1.501(r)-6 (2015).
52 Pub. L. No. 111-148, § 9007(c), 124 Stat. 858 (2010).
53 I.R.S. Priv. Ltr. Rul. 201731014 (Aug. 4, 2017); I.R.S. Priv. Ltr. Rul. 201833021 (Aug. 17, 2018); I.R.S. Priv. Ltr.
Rul. 201833020 (Aug. 17, 2018). CRS also searched Westlaw for federal court cases discussing the requirements in
§ 501(r), but did not identify any.
54 I.R.S. Priv. Ltr. Rul. 201833021 at 10 (Aug. 17, 2018); I.R.S. Priv. Ltr. Rul. 201833020 at 9.
55 See 26 U.S.C. § 501(r)(1)(A), (3); Treas. Reg. § 1.501(r)-3.
Congressional Research Service

7

Legal Requirements for Section 501(c)(3) Hospitals

women, or the elderly), and the hospital’s particular functions (such as a focus on certain medical
specialties or diseases).56 A hospital’s CHNA may not exclude the medically underserved, low-
income, or minority populations who reside in the geographical area served by the hospital,
except where those populations fall outside of the hospital’s targeted populations or principal
functions.57
In 2017, the IRS revoked the tax-exempt status of a hospital that had failed to conduct a CHNA.58
Although the hospital had conducted a CHNA, in part to qualify as a critical-access hospital
under Medicare, the IRS found that the hospital had not adopted the required implementation
strategy.59 Additionally, the hospital had not satisfied the requirement to make the CHNA widely
available to the public because it only offered a paper copy on request.60
Financial Assistance Policy
Section 501(r)(4)(A) requires § 501(c)(3) hospitals to have a written financial assistance policy
(FAP).61 The FAP, which must apply to all emergency and medically related care provided by the
hospital, must detail the full spectrum of financial assistance provided by the hospital, ranging
from discounted care to free care, and the eligibility criteria for each level.62
The FAP must also describe the mechanics of how patients may apply for financial assistance,
including any required documentation the patient will be asked to provide.63 The FAP must also
describe whether the hospital will consider a patient presumptively eligible based on prior FAP-
eligibility determinations or on information received from third party sources such as means-
tested public programs.64 The FAP shall also describe how the extent of financial assistance will
be calculated.65 For example, where a hospital offers a percentage discount, the FAP shall
describe the amount (such as gross charges) to which that percentage reduction will be applied.
The hospital must also widely publicize the FAP, via web sites, paper copies, and conspicuous
notices on bills and in admissions areas and emergency rooms.66 When publicizing the FAP, the
hospital must also make translations available for significant populations that have limited
English proficiency within the community served by the hospital.67
Emergency Medical Care Policy
Section 501(r)(4)(B) requires a § 501(c)(3) hospital to have a written emergency medical care
policy, under which the hospital shall provide emergency medical care to all individuals, without

56 Treas. Reg. § 1.501(r)-3(b)(3).
57 Id.
58 I.R.S. Priv. Ltr. Rul. 201731014 (Aug. 4, 2017).
59 Id. at 6.
60 Id. at 2.
61 Additionally, CMS requires that the FAP be the basis for the amounts hospitals claim as uncompensated care costs—
charity care, non-Medicare bad debts, and non-reimbursable Medicare bad debts—for purposes of calculating Medicare
uncompensated care payments to hospitals.
62 26 U.S.C. § 501(r)(4); Treas. Reg. § 1.501(r)-4.
63 Treas. Reg. § 1.501(r)-4(b)(3).
64 Id. § 1.501(r)-4(b)(1)(iii)(E).
65 Id. § 1.501(r)-4(b)(2).
66 Id. § 1.501(r)-4(b)(5).
67 Id.
Congressional Research Service

8

Legal Requirements for Section 501(c)(3) Hospitals

discrimination, and without regard to whether the individual qualifies under the hospital’s FAP.68
The policy must also prohibit the hospital from taking actions that would discourage a person
from seeking emergency medical treatment, such as by demanding payment before providing
care.69
Many § 501(c)(3) hospitals may already have a legal obligation to provide treatment for
emergency medical conditions under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act
(EMTALA).70 EMTALA generally requires Medicare-participating hospitals with an emergency
department to provide medical screening examinations and stabilizing treatment for persons who
come to the hospital’s emergency department and present with an emergency medical condition.71
A hospital that is subject to EMTALA can satisfy the § 501(r) written emergency medical care
policy requirement if its written policy states that it will comply with EMTALA.72
Limitation on Charges
Section 501(r)(5) imposes two limits on how much a hospital may charge individuals who are
FAP-eligible. For emergency and other medically necessary care, hospitals may not charge FAP-
eligible individuals more than the amounts generally billed (AGB) for care provided to those with
insurance coverage. For all other medical care, § 501(r) requires hospitals to charge FAP-eligible
patients less than the gross charges (i.e., the full, established prices) for such care.73
There are two methods for determining the AGB for a hospital. Under the “look-back” method,
an AGB percentage is calculated by dividing the sum of the amounts of all its claims for
emergency and other medically necessary care that have been allowed by health insurers
described in paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of this section during a prior twelve–month period by the sum of
the associated gross charges for those claims.74 That AGB percentage is then applied to the gross
charges to determine what amount a FAP-eligible person could be required to pay.
Alternatively, a hospital may use the “prospective” method to determine AGB using the amount
Medicare or Medicaid would generally allow for the provided medical care.75 In this method, the
amount that a FAP-eligible person could be required to pay would be limited by the amount
allowed under either Medicare or Medicaid.76
Extraordinary Billing and Collection Actions
Section 501(r)(6) requires § 501(c)(3) hospitals to make reasonable efforts to determine whether
an individual is eligible for financial assistance before beginning extraordinary collection
actions.77 Treasury regulations define extraordinary collection actions to include

68 See 26 U.S.C. § 501(r)(1)(B), (4); Treas. Reg. § 1.501(r)-4.
69 Treas. Reg. § 1.501(r)-4(c)(2).
70 Pub. L. No. 99-272, 100 Stat. 164 (1986) (codified as 42 U.S.C. § 1395dd).
71 See CRS In Focus IF12355, Overview of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) and
Emergency Abortion Services, by Jennifer A. Staman (2023).
72 Treas. Reg. § 1.501(r)-4(c)(3).
73 See 26 U.S.C. § 501(r)(1)(C), (5); Treas. Reg. § 1.501(r)-5.
74 Treas. Reg. § 1.501(r)-5(b)(3).
75 Id. § 1.501(r)-5(b)(4).
76 Id.
77 See 26 U.S.C. § 501(r)(1)(D), (6); Treas. Reg. § 1.501(r)-6.
Congressional Research Service

9

Legal Requirements for Section 501(c)(3) Hospitals

• most sales of an individual’s debt to another party such as a collection agency;
• reporting adverse information to consumer credit reporting agencies or credit
bureaus;
• deferring or denying medically necessary care because of an individual’s
nonpayment for previously provided FAP-eligible care;
• legal or judicial process, such as placing a lien, foreclosure, seizing a bank
account, filing suit, or garnishing wages.78
The reasonable efforts a hospital must take to determine whether an individual is FAP-eligible
include finding a person to be presumptively FAP-eligible based on third-party information or
prior FAP-eligibility determinations, and notifying the individual of the FAP and application
procedures at least thirty days before beginning any extraordinary collection action.79
Additionally, no extraordinary collection action may be taken sooner than 120 days after the first
post-discharge bill is provided to the individual.80
Although deferring or denying medically necessary care based on past-due amounts is generally
considered an extraordinary collection action, and therefore subject to the time limitations
described in the previous paragraph, Treasury regulations provide an exception to this time period
if the hospital provides a financial assistance application form and written notice of the FAP to the
individual, and provides a deadline for submitting such application that is no earlier than thirty
days from the notice and 240 days from the first post-discharge billing statement.81
Enforcement of §501(r) Requirements
Failure to satisfy any of the § 501(r) requirements above can potentially jeopardize a hospital’s
tax-exemption under § 501(c)(3). When deciding whether to revoke a hospital’s tax-exempt
status, Treasury regulations provide that IRS will consider the magnitude of the failure, any
history of noncompliance, the reason for noncompliance, and remedial actions the organization
has taken to correct noncompliance issues.82 Where a tax-exempt hospital system operates more
than one facility, one of which is noncompliant, the IRS may treat the income from the
noncompliant facility as taxable in lieu of revoking the entire organization’s tax-exempt status for
failing to comply with § 501(r).83 Additionally, the IRS may levy an excise tax upon a hospital for
any year in which it has failed to perform the required triennial CHNA, in the amount of
$50,000.84

78 26 C.F.R. § 1.501(r)-6(b).
79 Id. § 1.501(r)-6(c)(2).
80 Id. § 1.501(r)-6(c)(3)(i).
81 Id. § 1.501(r)-6(c)(3).
82 Treas. Reg. § 1.501(r)-2(a) (2015). See also I.R.S. Priv. Ltr. Rul. 201731014 (Aug. 4, 2017) (revoking tax-exempt
status after finding that failure to comply with CHNA requirements was “egregious” and that hospital lacked “the will,
financial resources, [or] the staff” to comply).
83 Treas. Reg. § 1.501(r)-2(d).
84 26 U.S.C. § 4959.
Congressional Research Service

10

Legal Requirements for Section 501(c)(3) Hospitals

Author Information

Edward C. Liu

Legislative Attorney

Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan
shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and
under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other
than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in
connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not
subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in
its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or
material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to
copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.

Congressional Research Service
R48027 · VERSION 1 · NEW
11