link to page 1 
 
 
Updated March 18, 2024
American Indian, Alaska Native, and Tribal Population Data
Overview 
Central America), and who maintains tribal affiliation or 
Federal agencies collect population data, including on 
community attachment.” 
American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) communities 
and federally recognized tribes (hereinafter tribes), to 
In 2020, the Census Bureau counted 9,666,058 people who 
allocate funding and provide services. There is no uniform 
identified as AI/AN. This figure includes members of more 
definition of AI/AN populations or tribal enrollment, and 
than one racial group. The Census Bureau also allows 
federal agencies rely on different sources for these data. 
people to list detailed ancestry, origin, and/or tribal 
This In Focus describes select AI/AN and tribal population 
affiliation; selected groups appear in Table 1. 
data sources, differences among these sources, past 
collection and reporting practices, current efforts to 
Table 1. Self-Reported Affiliation, 2020 
improve collection and reporting practices, and possible 
Self-identification by American Indians and Alaska Natives 
congressional policy considerations. 
Group 
Population 
Population Data Sources 
Cherokee 
1,513,326 
Tribal Enrollment Data 
Aztec 
583,981 
Tribal enrollment, which may also be known as citizenship 
or membership, is one source of information on tribal 
Navajo Nation 
423,412 
populations. Because tribes are sovereign nations, every 
Maya 
300,519 
tribe generally determines its own criteria for who is 
eligible to become a tribal citizen or member, which may 
Blackfeet Tribe of the Blackfeet Indian 
297,899 
include factors such as degree of tribal ancestry. 
Reservation of Montana 
Choctaw 
255,557 
Many tribes provide enrollment data on their official 
websites. Others view enrollment data as proprietary 
Alaska Native 
241,797 
information. While tribes have historically submitted 
Chippewa 
130,048 
enrollment data to the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), 
currently, the agency does not publicly report those figures. 
Apache 
129,589 
BIA’s Tribal Service Population Data 
Sioux 
126,571 
BIA calculates the tribal service population to determine 
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2020 Census, Detailed Demographic 
eligibility for its services. The Snyder Act of 1921 (25 
and Housing Characteristics File A, Table T01001. 
U.S.C. §13) authorizes BIA to operate programs and spend 
federal funds for the benefit and assistance of tribes and 
Notes: This list contains 10 of the largest groupings out of more 
individual tribal members throughout the United States. 
than 1,000 groups, such as tribes and villages. Individuals may choose 
BIA determines a tribe’s service population based on the 
to identify as being part of more than one group and, when that 
tribe’s estimate of all tribal individuals who live on or near 
occurs, will be counted more than once. 
its reservation (25 C.F.R. §20.100). There are about 326 
tribal reservations with a total national service population 
Annual estimates for the overall AI/AN population are 
of nearly 2 million. Currently, tribal service population data 
available from the Census Bureau’s American Community 
are not publicly available below the national level. 
Survey (ACS), a large-scale survey of U.S. households. 
Those estimates are available at the national level as well as 
U.S. Census Bureau’s AI/AN Data 
for states, congressional districts, and other geographic 
The U.S. Census Bureau conducts the decennial 
areas. The decennial census, which provides an actual count 
enumeration of the population required by the Constitution 
of the AI/AN population and a more granular breakdown by 
(Article I, Section 2, clause 3) and operates other programs 
self-identified tribal affiliation, is next scheduled for 2030. 
to measure the nation’s people and economy. 
Differences Among Data Sources 
The Census Bureau relies on individual self-identification 
The data sources described above provide varying 
as AI/AN using the Office of Management and Budget’s 
population estimates due to a number of factors, including 
(OMB’s) standardized definitions for racial and ethnic 
the absence of a statutory definition of AI/AN or tribal 
categories. OMB currently defines American Indian or 
populations.  
Alaska Native as a “person having origins in any of the 
original peoples of North and South America (including 
For example, the Census Bureau’s figures rely on a 
relatively broad definition of AI/AN, while criteria for 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
American Indian, Alaska Native, and Tribal Population Data 
tribal service area and tribal enrollment may be less 
personnel to collect consistent tribal population data with 
inclusive. As a result, Census Bureau statistics may report 
methodologies that meet federal requirements. Some tribes 
larger populations than tribal enrollment or service 
also have expressed privacy concerns. Although some tribes 
population data. For example, in 2023, the Cherokee Nation 
choose to make enrollment figures publicly available, 
reported about 450,000 enrolled tribal members, but more 
others have raised concerns that public release against their 
than 1.5 million people reported being at least part 
wishes would harm tribal sovereignty. Some tribes have 
Cherokee in the 2020 census.  
also noted that once BIA collects this data, statistics might 
be obtained through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA, 5 
The Census Bureau allows people to self-report in multiple 
U.S.C. §552) requests. 
racial and ethnic categories. In 2020, 61% of people who 
identified as AI/AN were also members of at least one other 
Current Approaches to Improving 
race (Asian, Black or African American, Native Hawaiian 
Collection and Reporting 
and Other Pacific Islander, White, or Some Other Race). 
In P.L. 115-93, Congress transferred the responsibility for 
Among the 3.7 million AI/AN people who listed no other 
developing and publishing biennial tribal population reports 
race in the 2020 census, 40% also identified as Hispanic 
from BIA to the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL). As of 
(which OMB currently considers an ethnicity, not a race).  
early 2024, DOL is conducting research and outreach, and 
has not published a report.  
A tribe’s service population may be larger than its enrolled 
population, because its service population may include 
Some federal agencies are working with tribes to improve 
AI/ANs who are not members of that tribe. For example, 
tribal data collection. In 2023, the Department of the 
AI/ANs or members of one tribe may live close to another 
Interior led an interagency tribal consultation session on 
tribe’s reservation and may be counted in that other tribe’s 
federal and tribal data priorities. They discussed collecting 
service population. This definition of a service population 
tribal enrollment data annually, developing a tribal service 
enables services to reach AI/ANs from tribes that are 
population dataset, and exploring opportunities to check the 
landless or live off (but close to) a reservation. 
Census Bureau’s data for tribal affiliation self-identification 
against BIA tribal enrollment data to validate Census data. 
The service population metric may not fit the circumstances 
The Census Bureau has also committed to working with 
of some tribes, leading to inconsistent data. For example, 
AI/AN stakeholders to develop new statistical products.  
only tribes with reservations can report their service 
populations, and many tribes and Alaska Natives do not 
Options for Congress 
have reservations. Therefore, this dataset likely 
As part of its oversight and legislative role, Congress may 
inadequately accounts for those groups. In addition, some 
consider assessing the accuracy and suitability of federal 
Oklahoma-based tribes’ service areas are based on the 
agency methodologies for measuring and serving tribal 
tribes’ historic reservations, which are larger than most 
and/or AI/AN populations.  
current reservations. 
For example, Congress may be interested in ensuring 
Past Approaches to Collection and 
consistent AI/AN and tribal data collection and use across 
Reporting 
federal agencies. If this is a priority, Congress may consider 
From 1982 to 2013, BIA released a generally biennial 
defining AI/AN or tribal membership for the purpose of 
American Indian Population and Labor Force Report that 
population data collection. This definition could be based 
collected and reported AI/AN and certain tribal population 
on geography, race, tribal enrollment, or some combination. 
data based on a range of data sources, including BIA field 
offices, tribes, and the Census Bureau. According to BIA, 
Alternatively, Congress may be interested in using different 
collecting reliable data for the biennial report was 
datasets depending on its priorities. For example, if 
challenging. Some tribes reported confusion over whom to 
Congress is interested in benefiting certain AI/AN 
include in their service populations, and concerns were 
populations or tribes, it could consider specifying the use of 
raised about the accuracy and consistency of the data.  
certain AI/AN and tribal datasets. For example, BIA has 
traditionally collected and used service population data to 
Many tribes and other stakeholders also raised concerns 
allocate funding, and some tribes believe that this should 
about BIA’s publications. For example, some assert that 
continue because it is a relatively inclusive method. On the 
using Census Bureau estimates is inappropriate because 
other hand, some tribes have suggested that BIA use a 
they come with margins of error, which can be sizable 
methodology that incorporates not only enrollment but also 
when working with relatively small populations. 
the relative costs of addressing tribal needs, which could 
Alternatively, some recommend using administrative data 
ensure that small tribes receive greater funding to achieve 
already collected by federal agencies such as the U.S. 
community objectives. 
Department of Health and Human Services. Other tribes 
and tribal groups recommend using data provided by tribes.  
Ben Leubsdorf, Research Librarian   
Mariel J. Murray, Specialist in Natural Resources Policy   
Considering these challenges, some tribes have asked 
Nik Taylor, Senior Research Librarian   
federal agencies to use tribal enrollment data. Use of tribal 
enrollment data raises a number of considerations. For 
IF12612
example, not all tribes may have the resources and trained 
 
 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
American Indian, Alaska Native, and Tribal Population Data 
 
 
Disclaimer 
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to 
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. 
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has 
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the 
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be 
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include 
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you 
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 
 
https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF12612 · VERSION 2 · UPDATED