

 
 INSIGHTi 
 
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Civil Works: 
Primer and Resources 
Updated July 20, 2023 
Congress plays a role in the nation’s water resource development through authorization and 
appropriations of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) projects and activities, as well as support for 
other agencies with water resource-related activities. USACE is a Department of Defense (DOD) agency 
that develops civil works projects principally to improve navigable channels, reduce flood and storm 
damage, and restore aquatic ecosystems.  
The Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works (ASACW) provides policy direction and supervision 
of USACE civil works. A military Chief of Engineers manages USACE’s civil and military missions. 
USACE’s 38 district offices work with nonfederal project sponsors.  
Standard USACE project delivery consists of USACE leading the study, design, and construction of 
authorized projects. Nonfederal project sponsors typically share in study and construction costs, including 
providing real estate. Nonfederal sponsors generally perform operation and maintenance (O&M) for flood 
risk reduction and ecosystem restoration projects. USACE typically performs O&M for navigation and 
some multipurpose projects, such as dams. USACE operates more than 700 dams and maintains more 
than 900 coastal, Great Lakes, and inland harbors, as well as 12,000 miles of inland waterways. 
USACE projects typically require two separate congressional authorizations—one for studying feasibility 
and one for construction—and appropriations for both. This Insight summarizes the USACE authorization 
and funding processes and provides links to related resources. 
Project and Programmatic Authorization 
Most USACE projects start with congressional authorization to conduct a feasibility study of a water 
resource issue. If a feasibility study is funded, USACE evaluates alternatives to address the issue and 
recommends one alternative for construction. The Chief of Engineers then signs a recommendation for 
project construction (i.e., the Chief’s report) and transmits the completed study and the Chief’s report to 
congressional authorizing committees, which consider whether to authorize project construction. If 
project features or estimated costs change significantly after authorization, additional congressional 
authorization may be necessary to modify the project authorization.  
Congressional Research Service 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
IN11810 
CRS INSIGHT 
Prepared for Members and  
 Committees of Congress 
 
  
 
Congressional Research Service 
2 
Congress has granted USACE programmatic authorities―Continuing Authorities Programs (CAPs)—that 
enable USACE and nonfederal sponsors to undertake cost-shared projects of limited scope and cost 
without requiring project-specific congressional authorization. Congress also has authorized USACE to 
engage in technical assistance for certain activities, such as flood risk mitigation and watershed studies, 
and to provide environmental infrastructure assistance for certain publicly owned facilities (e.g., 
municipal water supply and wastewater collection projects).  
Resources on USACE Authorizations 
•  USACE, “Signed Chief Reports” 
•  CRS In Focus IF11106, Army Corps of Engineers: Continuing Authorities Programs  
•  CRS Report R47162, Overview of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Environmental 
Infrastructure (EI) Assistance 
Water Resources Development Acts 
Congress generally authorizes USACE studies, projects, and programs and makes changes to the agency’s 
policies through omnibus authorization acts, typically titled Water Resources Development Acts 
(WRDAs). WRDAs generally authorize new activities that are added to the pool of existing authorized 
activities. Numerous projects authorized for construction in previous WRDAs remain unfunded. 
Authorization provisions in WRDAs can be project-specific, programmatic, or general directives. Most 
project-specific authorizations in WRDAs fall into three general categories: project studies, construction 
projects, and modifications to existing projects. WRDAs also have established deauthorization processes 
and/or have deauthorized individual projects.  
To develop WRDAs, the authorizing committees for USACE—the House Committee on Transportation 
and Infrastructure and the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works—typically hold hearings 
to receive testimony from stakeholders, solicit input from Members (including, at times, Member requests 
for project-specific provisions), and review reports transmitted by the Administration. For example, the 
ASACW annually transmits a report to USACE’s congressional authorizing committees containing 
nonfederal submissions to USACE proposing that Congress authorize site-specific studies and 
modifications.  
Since the 1980s, Congress generally has considered WRDAs biennially; the timing of enactment has 
varied. Congress enacted WRDA-type legislation in 2000, 2007, 2014, 2016, 2018, 2020, and 2022. 
Congress enacted WRDA 2022 in December 2022. After WRDA 2022 enactment, USACE indicated that 
the agency is developing implementation guidance for 10 WRDA 2022 provisions.  
Resources on WRDA Considerations 
•  CRS In Focus IF11322, Water Resources Development Acts: Primer  
•  CRS Insight IN11965, Water Resources Development Act of 2022 (WRDA 2022)  
•  CRS Insight IN11118, Army Corps of Engineers: Section 7001 Report on Future Studies 
and Projects  
Appropriations 
The majority of USACE’s appropriations are used to perform work on geographically specific studies and 
congressionally authorized projects (e.g., study and construction of new and modified projects, O&M of 
constructed projects). Congress typically appropriates funds for USACE activities in annual Energy and 
Water Development appropriations acts (e.g., $8.3 billion in FY2022 and FY2023).  
  
 link to page 3 
Congressional Research Service 
3 
USACE’s annual appropriations process generally involves three major milestones (see Figure 1): the 
President’s budget request, congressional deliberation and enactment of appropriations, and 
Administration development of a USACE work plan allocating funds to specific studies and projects. In 
the 117th Congress, Congress also included congressionally directed funding for site-specific projects (i.e., 
community project funding/congressionally directed spending [CPF/CDS]) in the FY2022 and FY2023 
appropriations processes, the first of this type of funding since the 111th Congress. The 118th Congress is 
also considering CPF/CDS in its USACE appropriations process. 
Figure 1.  USACE Annual Appropriations Process  
 
Source: Congressional Research Service (CRS). 
Congress has also used supplemental appropriations to fund USACE emergency specific flood-related 
response and recovery activities (e.g., $5.7 billion in Division B, Title IV, of P.L. 117-43; $1.1 billion in 
Division N of P.L. 117-328) and to advance other purposes, such as general investments in infrastructure 
(e.g., $17.1 billion in Division J, Title III, of P.L. 117-58). For some supplemental appropriations, 
Congress has directed USACE to publish spend plans identifying funded studies and projects.  
Resources on USACE Appropriations 
•  USACE, “Civil Works Budget and Performance” 
•  CRS Report R46320, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: Annual Appropriations Process  
•  CRS In Focus IF12090, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: FY2023 Appropriations  
•  CRS In Focus IF12370, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: FY2024 Appropriations  
•  CRS In Focus IF11945, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: Supplemental Appropriations  
 
Author Information 
 
Anna E. Normand 
  Nicole T. Carter 
Analyst in Natural Resources Policy 
Specialist in Natural Resources Policy 
 
 
 
 
 
Disclaimer
  
Congressional Research Service 
4 
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff 
to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of 
Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of 
information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. 
CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United 
States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, 
as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the 
permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 
 
IN11810 · VERSION 6 · UPDATED