

 
 INSIGHTi 
 
The Federal Flood Risk Management 
Standard (FFRMS) 
July 5, 2023 
Flooding is the most frequent and costly natural disaster facing the nation, and floodplain policy has 
particular relevance for infrastructure and the federal government’s exposure to flood losses and demand 
for disaster assistance. The Federal Flood Risk Management Standard (FFRMS) is a mechanism for 
federal agencies to consider and manage current and future flood risk by requiring federally funded 
projects to be located out of flood risk areas or constructed to reduce the effects of current and future 
flood hazards (including less-frequent larger events). Five executive orders are directly relevant to the 
FFRMS. 
E.O. 11988 
President Carter signed E.O. 11988, Floodplain Management, in May 1977 to require federal actions to 
avoid supporting development in the floodplain:  
•  Federal actions are to avoid, if alternatives are available, supporting development in the 
1% annual-chance floodplain (also referred to as the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA), 
the 100-year floodplain, or the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) floodplain). 
•  Under implementation guidance for E.O. 11988, critical actions are to avoid the 0.2% 
annual-chance (500-year) floodplain if alternatives are available. 
E.O. 13690 
President Obama signed E.O. 13690, Establishing a Federal Flood Risk Management Standard and a 
Process for Further Soliciting and Considering Stakeholder Input, in January 2015. It established for 
federally funded projects an FFRMS requiring a higher level of flood resilience than E.O. 11988. 
Federally funded projects are defined as actions where federal funds are used for new construction, 
substantial improvement, or to address substantial damage to structures and facilities. E.O. 13690 
modified the E.O. 11988 requirements, largely by redefining the floodplain used for federal floodplain 
management policy.  
Congressional Research Service 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
IN12193 
CRS INSIGHT 
Prepared for Members and  
 Committees of Congress 
 
  
 
 link to page 2 
Congressional Research Service 
2 
E.O. 13807 
In August 2017, President Trump signed E.O. 13807, Establishing Discipline and Accountability in the 
Environmental Review and Permitting Process for Infrastructure Projects, in an effort to streamline 
federal infrastructure approval. Among other actions, E.O. 13807 revoked E.O. 13690. 
E.O. 13990 and E.O. 14030 
In January 2021, President Biden revoked E.O. 13807 as part of E.O. 13990, Protecting Public Health 
and the Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis, which effectively reinstated 
E.O. 13690, including the FFRMS. In May 2021, President Biden’s E.O. 14030, Climate-Related 
Financial Risk, confirmed that guidelines for implementing E.O. 13690 remain in effect. 
The FFRMS Floodplain 
The FFRMS floodplain can be determined by one of three methods:  
1.  the freeboard value approach (FVA); 
2.  the 0.2% annual-chance (500-year) flood approach (see Figure 1); or 
3.  the climate-informed science approach (CISA), which incorporates current and future 
changes in flooding based on best-available, actionable climate science and other factors 
or changes affecting flood risk. 
The FVA method determines the extent and elevation subject to flooding by adding an additional two feet 
to the elevation of the BFE (water level from a flood with a 1% chance of equaling or exceeding that level 
in any given year) for noncritical actions or an additional three feet to the BFE for critical actions. Critical 
actions are defined as any activity for which even the chance of flooding would be too great. CISA tools 
are under development by the Flood Resilience Interagency Working Group (FRIWG). 
Figure 1. Vertical Elevation and Horizontal Extent of the Federal Flood Risk Management 
Standard Floodplain Using the 0.2% Annual-Chance Approach 
 
Source: CRS, adapted from Pew Charitable Trusts, North Carolina City Adopts Stringent Standard for Building in a Flood Plain, 
Issue Brief, November 19, 2019. 
  
 link to page 2 Congressional Research Service 
3 
Note: The current floodplain (the Special Flood Hazard Area) is the area inundated by the 1% annual-chance flood (shown 
in red). The FFRMS floodplain is the area inundated by the 0.2% annual-chance flood (shown in blue). In this il ustration, 
the 0.2% annual-chance floodplain expands both the horizontal extent and the elevation of the inundated area. 
Agency FFRMS Implementation 
While broad federal FFRMS implementing guidelines were finalized in October 2015, various federal 
agencies are currently developing or updating procedures and regulations tailored to their programs to 
account for the reinstated FFRMS.  
•  The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has produced policy guidance for 
partial implementation of the FFRMS. It requires the use of the FFRMS FVA for 
noncritical actions involving structures in the SFHA that receive funding from any FEMA 
program (Individual Assistance, Public Assistance, Hazard Mitigation Assistance). This 
policy does not address the horizontal expansion of the floodplain (see Figure 1), or the 
application of the FFRMS to critical actions. FEMA intends to fully implement the 
FFRMS by rulemaking (i.e., amending 44 C.F.R. Part 9). 
•  The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers uses CISA methods set out in agency guidance to 
evaluate climate change impacts on coastal and inland flood hazard for its civil works 
projects.  
•  The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has a 2023 proposed rule 
that would affect projects receiving HUD assistance, financing, or insurance. It would 
establish that, when possible, the CISA approach should determine the FFRMS 
floodplain and would require that newly constructed and substantially improved 
structures be elevated or floodproofed to the FFRMS floodplain elevation. The proposed 
rule would also revise HUD’s minimum property standards under the FHA mortgage 
insurance program, and require that the lowest floor be built at least two feet above the 
1% annual-chance floodplain for low-rent public housing programs. 
•  The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency determined that the FFRMS would go into 
effect starting FY2022, applying to certain projects funded by State Revolving Fund 
capitalization grants.  
•  The General Services Administration submitted a draft floodplain management policy 
that would support the FRIWG approach to implementation of the FFRMS.  
Many other agencies do not have publicly available information on their implementation of the FFRMS. 
Considerations for Congress 
Congress may assess FFRMS’s effect on implementation of federally funded projects and disaster-related 
programs. For example, buildings and infrastructure funded by the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act 
and P.L. 117-169 (referred to as the Inflation Reduction Act) may not be built to the FFRMS, as the 
standard has not been fully implemented by most agencies, leaving these assets potentially vulnerable to 
flooding. Congress may consider codifying, modifying implementation, or blocking implementation of 
the FFRMS. Congress may also consider how to evaluate the net benefits of the FFRMS, including its 
impact on low-income and vulnerable populations. 
  
Congressional Research Service 
4 
Author Information 
 
Diane P. Horn 
  Nicole T. Carter 
Specialist in Flood Insurance and Emergency 
Specialist in Natural Resources Policy 
Management 
 
 
 
 
 
Disclaimer 
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff 
to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of 
Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of 
information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. 
CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United 
States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, 
as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the 
permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 
 
IN12193 · VERSION 1 · NEW