link to page 1 

 
 
May 22, 2023
Nonfederal Levee Safety: Primer, Status, and Considerations
This In Focus discusses nonfederal levees, the evolution of 
construction, operation, and maintenance by eliminating 
federal efforts to enhance nonfederal levee safety since 
flood insurance purchase requirements and reducing 
2007, and related policy considerations.  
premiums for structures that are mapped as removed from 
the 100-year floodplain due to a levee. The Federal 
Nonfederal Levees and Risk 
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is responsible 
Levees (i.e., engineered earthen embankments) and 
for accrediting levees to appear on NFIP Flood Insurance 
floodwalls (i.e., metal or concrete flood control structures) 
Rate Maps (FIRMs). To be accredited and appear on a 
are built to reduce flood losses. Herein, these structures are 
FIRM, the levee owner must obtain a certification 
collectively referred to as levees. Levees currently operated 
consisting of documentation, signed and sealed by a 
and maintained by nonfederal entities may have been 
registered professional engineer, that the levee meets the 
constructed by federal agencies (e.g., U.S. Army Corps of 
NFIP requirements at 44 C.F.R. §65.10. 
Engineers [USACE]); with federal government assistance; 
or by state, local, or private entities. There may be as many 
USACE Repairs and Inspections 
as 100,000 miles of nonfederal levees in the United States.  
USACE operates a repair program—the P.L. 84-99 
Rehabilitation Program—for nonfederal flood control 
While levees are built to reduce risk, they also can pose 
works. If a nonfederal levee owner participating in the 
risks. Residual risk remains after a levee is constructed. For 
program has maintained a levee in good condition, as 
example, floods more intense than the flood that a levee 
inspected and assessed by USACE, USACE can repair 
was designed to manage can overtop the levee, or poorly 
damage to that levee from certain floods or other natural 
designed, constructed, or maintained levees can fail in other 
events. USACE regularly inspects 1,600 nonfederal levee 
ways. Risk associated with levees is a function of the 
systems (consisting of 13,000 miles of levees) that 
hazard (e.g., level and duration of floodwaters), the levee’s 
participate in the program.  
performance, and the potential consequences (i.e., what 
assets and populations may be exposed to loss, damage, and 
National Levee Safety Program 
disruption). Figure 1 illustrates the components of levee 
Prior to 2007, there was no federal authority to inventory 
risk and some levee performance concerns. Levee safety 
levees or promote state and tribal levee safety programs. 
concerns increase when development behind a levee 
Beyond federal requirements to appear on an NFIP map and 
increases. 
to participate in the P.L. 84-99 Rehabilitation Program, 
there also was no broadly applicable national standard or 
Nonfederal or private entities that operate levees are 
requirement for nonfederal levee construction or 
responsible for levee maintenance and safety. While a state 
maintenance. In 2007 and 2014, Congress authorized the 
may choose to regulate levees, only a few states currently 
National Levee Safety Program (NLSP; 33 U.S.C. Chapter 
operate programs to oversee design, construction, and 
46), consisting of multiple program elements, including the 
maintenance of nonfederal levees. There is no federal 
creation of a levee inventory, development of voluntary 
authority to regulate nonfederal levee safety, although some 
safety guidelines, and the promotion of state and tribal 
federal programs may shape how nonfederal levees are 
levee safety programs. Congress charged USACE with 
constructed and maintained. 
developing the inventory—the National Levee Database 
(NLD). The NLD currently captures almost 25,000 miles of 
Federal Flood Insurance and Levees 
levees and is the most complete dataset on the nation’s 
Since its establishment in 1968, the National Flood 
levees, although it is not comprehensive. Many NLSP 
Insurance Program (NFIP) has indirectly encouraged levee 
actions beyond the NLD have remained largely unfunded. 
Figure 1. Illustration of Levee Risk Components and Levee Performance Concerns 
 
Source: CRS, adapted from Zina Deretsky, National Science Foundation, and USACE, Risk Assessment for Flood Risk Management Studies, 2017. 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 

Nonfederal Levee Safety: Primer, Status, and Considerations 
methodologies for determining probable maximum floods 
Figure 2. Levees in the National Levee Database 
and approaches for considering changing climate conditions 
over the functional life of a levee system. Among the levee 
safety policy questions raised is how levee investments 
should proceed in light of data limitations. Other policy 
questions include how to integrate new levees and the 
rehabilitation of existing levees into more comprehensive 
water and flood-risk management systems that work 
compatibly with natural features and floodplain functions. 
There also is the question of the efficacy of nonfederal 
efforts to manage land use and residual risk behind levees 
and federal efforts to encourage such management.  
Levee safety stakeholders are watching whether new 
programs will support nonfederal levee safety investments. 
For example, the Safeguarding Tomorrow Through 
 
Ongoing Risk Mitigation Act of 2020 (P.L. 116-284) 
Source: CRS using National Levee Database, 2023. 
authorized FEMA to enter into agreements with eligible 
Notes: Levees in red are USACE-owned or in the P.L. 84-99 
entities to establish revolving loan funds for hazard 
Rehabilitation Program; other levees are in purple. 
mitigation. USACE’s Corps Water Infrastructure Financing 
Program also has been authorized to provide loans for flood 
While most states and tribes have not materially advanced 
control projects, which could include levees. However, 
their levee safety programs or levee construction and 
current congressional appropriations limits on the 
program’s implementation restrict lending to nonfederal 
maintenance oversight since 2007, some states have 
advanced and contributed to NLD efforts, such as 
dam safety-related projects (see CRS Insight IN12021, 
California, Illinois, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Texas. In 
Corps Water Infrastructure Financing Program (CWIFP)). 
2022, pursuant to the NLSP, USACE and FEMA kicked off 
a multiyear effort to develop voluntary national levee safety 
USACE also may complete a P.L. 84-99 Rehabilitation 
guidelines and to provide tools for states and tribes to 
Program rulemaking in 2023. Among other actions, the 
establish and implement their own levee safety programs.  
November 2022 proposed rule (87 Federal Register 68386) 
would change the cost sharing for some of the program’s 
Other Nonfederal Levee Activities 
repairs from between 80% and 100% federal to 65% 
Congressional direction in 2012 and 2014 led to efforts by 
federal. 
FEMA and USACE to better coordinate their data sharing 
on levees and levee inspections to assist with FEMA levee 
Congress may conduct oversight of NLSP implementation, 
accreditation. Congressional direction also led to FEMA 
how nonfederal levee safety is being addressed through new 
altering how levees appear on FIRMs. Levees are shown on 
and existing federal assistance programs, and how agencies 
FIRMs, but legislation to require that the maps identify 
are implementing long-standing programs. While 
residual risk behind levees has not been enacted.  
nonfederal levee data are provided voluntarily to the NLD, 
NLD data may be used by federal agencies for statutory or 
In a 2018 report on levee safety, USACE estimated the cost 
regulatory purposes. For example, the new pricing 
to address safety issues for federally constructed levees and 
methodology introduced by the NFIP, known as Risk 
levees in the P.L. 84-99 Rehabilitation Program at between 
Rating 2.0, relies on the NLD to determine the level of risk 
$6.5 billion and $38 billion (2018 dollars). As described in 
reduction that a levee provides. See CRS Insight IN11777, 
CRS Report R47286, Flooding: Selected Federal 
National Flood Insurance Program Risk Rating 2.0: 
Assistance and Programs to Reduce Risk, nonfederal levee-
Frequently Asked Questions. Data from the NLD is used in 
related improvements may be pursued under various federal 
the calculation of flood insurance premiums for individual 
assistance programs. These opportunities have expanded in 
structures behind levees. However, only 20% of levees in 
recent years due to new programs (e.g., FEMA’s Building 
the NLD have enough information to fulfill all key data 
Resilient Infrastructure and Communities program [BRIC]) 
needs for NFIP pricing, adding to congressional concern 
and existing programs receiving additional funding through 
about changes in premiums under Risk Rating 2.0. Several 
infrastructure and disaster supplemental appropriations 
Louisiana parishes are suing FEMA over concerns that Risk 
legislation. In its first two years (FY2020-FY2021), BRIC 
Rating 2.0 does not properly account for flood control 
funded seven levee projects.  
measures such as levees.  
Policy Considerations and Other 
Nicole T. Carter, Specialist in Natural Resources Policy   
Developments 
Diane P. Horn, Specialist in Flood Insurance and 
Entities currently investing in new levees and levee 
Emergency Management   
improvements are confronted in the near term with certain 
data limitations. While some historic precipitation data has 
IF12404
been updated in recent years, efforts are ongoing to update 
 
 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
Nonfederal Levee Safety: Primer, Status, and Considerations 
 
 
Disclaimer 
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to 
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. 
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has 
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the 
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be 
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include 
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you 
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 
 
https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF12404 · VERSION 1 · NEW