link to page 2 link to page 2 link to page 2 link to page 2 
Updated April 6, 2023
Payments in Lieu of Taxes (PILT): Section 6902 Payments
Introduction
Entitlement Land and Per Acre Payment Rates: Lands
Several federal programs exist to compensate local
eligible under PILT are referred to as entitlement lands in
jurisdictions for the presence of nontaxable federal lands.
statute (31 U.S.C. §6901) and include federal lands
The widest-ranging program is the Department of the
Interior’s (DOI’s)
in the National Park System;
Payments in Lieu of Taxes (PILT)
program. PILT compensates units of general local
in the National Forest System;
government for selected lands administered by several
federal agencies. Units of general local government are
administered by the Bureau of Land Management;
generally referred to as counties, although a unit could be
in the National Wildlife Refuge System withdrawn from
other than a county. In FY2022, PILT paid $549.4 million
the public domain;
to more than 1,900 counties across 49 states, the District of
Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands.
dedicated to the use of federal water resources
development projects;
PILT funding is allocated through three payment
used for certain dredge disposal areas;
mechanisms—Section 6902, Section 6904, and Section
6905—which are named for the sections of law in which
located near Purgatory River Canyon and Piñon
they are authorized (31 U.S.C. §§6902, 6904, 6905).
Canyon, CO, that were acquired after December 31,
Section 6902 payments account for the majority of PILT
1981, to expand the Fort Carson military reservation;
payments and are available to the most counties. Section
on which are located semi-active or inactive Army
6904 and 6905 payments account for less than 1% of PILT
installations used for certain purposes; and
payments, are supplementary to 6902 payments, and are
made to selected counties for specific purposes as identified
acquired per the Southern Nevada Public Land
in statute. This CRS product discusses Section 6902
Management Act (P.L. 105-263).
payments.
The first step in calculating authorized payments is
Payment Formula
determining the number of entitlement acres within a
Section 6902 payments are made to counties pursuant to a
county, which is the responsibility of the various federal
formula provided in statute (Figure 1). Several factors are
agencies that administer the lands (Figure 1, Step A).
used to calculate the authorized PILT payment amount for a
Taking into account a population-based payment ceiling as
county: entitlement land and per acre payment rates,
described below (Figure 1, Step B), a county’s authorized
population-based payment ceilings, prior-year payments,
payment is calculated by multiplying the number of
pass-through laws, and inflation. These factors are
entitlement acres by one of two per acre payment rates—a
described below. Additionally, the level of funding
higher rate offset by prior-year payments (Alternative A) or
available each year for PILT payments determines whether
a non-offset lower rate (Alternative B) (Figure 1, Step C).
counties receive the fully authorized payment amount or a
The higher amount is the authorized payment.
lesser, prorated amount.
https://crsreports.congress.gov
link to page 2 link to page 2 link to page 2 link to page 2 link to page 2 link to page 2 
Payments in Lieu of Taxes (PILT): Section 6902 Payments
Figure 1. PILT Section 6902 Payment Formula, with FY2022 Rates
Source: CRS, with data from 31 U.S.C. §§6901 et seq. and DOI, FY2022 Payments in Lieu of Taxes National Summary, at https://www.doi.gov/pilt/
resources/annual-reports. Per acre payment rates are adjusted annual y for inflation (31 U.S.C. §6903(d)).
Population-Based Payment Ceiling: The law limits the
A and only when a state has not implemented pass-through
payment a county is authorized to receive based on a
laws as described below (Figure 1, Step C, Alternative A).
population-based payment ceiling. This ceiling is calculated
by multiplying a county’s population by a corresponding
Pass-Through Laws: States may have pass-through laws
per capita payment rate, as described below (Figure 1,
that require federal payments under selected compensation
Steps B). As a county’s population increases, the per capita
programs to automatically pass through the county to
payment rate generally decreases, although the ceiling
specified local jurisdictions or districts (such as school
generally increases (Figure 2).
districts). Only prior-year payments under other programs
made at the county level are deducted during Alternative A
Figure 2. Population-Based Payment Ceiling, FY2022
calculations; payments subject to pass-through laws do not
count as prior-year payments and are not deducted.
Inflation: Per acre payment rates used in Alternatives A
and B and per capita payment rates used for population-
based payment ceilings are adjusted for inflation annually
based on the Consumer Price Index (31 U.S.C. §6903(d)).
Alternative A or Alternative B: A county’s authorized
payment is the higher of either Alternative A or Alternative
B. Alternative A has a higher per acre payment rate but
accounts for prior-year payments, which are subtracted
during the payment calculation. Alternative B has a lower
per acre rate, but prior-year payments are not subtracted.
Under both alternatives, if the product of multiplying the
Source: CRS, with data from DOI, FY2022 Payments in Lieu of Taxes
number of entitlement acres by the per acre payment rate is
National Summary, at https://www.doi.gov/pilt/resources/annual-
greater than the population-based payment ceiling, the
reports.
population-based ceiling is used to calculate a county’s
authorized payment (Figure 1, Step C).
For counties with a population of 5,000 or larger, the
Appropriations
population is rounded to the nearest 1,000. For counties
with populations smaller than 5,000, the actual population
The DOI Office of the Secretary calculates authorized PILT
is multiplied by the per capita rate for a county with a
payments each fiscal year pursuant to the statutory formula.
population of 5,000. Counties with populations greater than
However, the amount available for disbursement ultimately
50,000 have the same ceiling as counties with populations
depends on how much funding is appropriated for PILT
of 50,000.
(Figure 1, Step D). Over the years, PILT has been funded
through either discretionary or mandatory appropriations or
Prior-Year Non-PILT Payments: The PILT formula
both. Appropriations have been equal to or very near the
accounts for counties receiving certain other federal land
authorized amount in some years and substantially less than
based payments. Under Alternative A, PILT requires the
the authorized amount in others. In years when funding for
amounts received in the prior year pursuant to these
PILT payments is less than the authorized amount, county
payments to be subtracted from the payment amount
payments typically have been prorated to accommodate the
calculated. Prior-year payments are considered from several
difference (Figure 1, Step E). The amount of proration
federal programs identified in statute (31 U.S.C. §6903(a)).
depends on the difference between the authorized and
Prior-year payments are subtracted only under Alternative
appropriated amounts. For example, a county’s prorated
https://crsreports.congress.gov
Payments in Lieu of Taxes (PILT): Section 6902 Payments
payment can be substantially less than its authorized
to be funded at the authorized amount for FY2023.
payment if there is a substantial difference between the
However, P.L. 117-328 did not specify the actual funding
authorized and appropriated amounts. A county’s prorated
level, as the FY2023 authorized amount had not yet been
payment can be nearly equal to the authorized payment
calculated when the law was enacted. This calculation
when appropriated funding for county payments is only
typically has occurred in late spring, and payments are
slightly less than the authorized amount, such as when the
typically disbursed around June. Division G provided
deviation results only from a set-aside for program
additional stipulations, including that up to $400,000 may
administration.
be used for administration and payments may be prorated if
necessary.
Annual discretionary appropriations laws also have
provided requirements for PILT payments. For example,
For more information, see CRS Report R46260, The
they have restricted county payments authorized for less
Payments in Lieu of Taxes (PILT) Program: An Overview.
than $100, allowed payments to be prorated if appropriated
funding is insufficient to cover authorized amounts, and set
Katie Hoover, Specialist in Natural Resources Policy
aside funding to be used for program administration.
IF11772
FY2023 Payments
Section 114 of Division G of the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2023 (P.L. 117-328) provided for PILT
Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress.
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.
https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF11772 · VERSION 3 · UPDATED