The 1% Excise Tax on Stock Repurchases
February 15, 2023
(Buybacks)
Jane G. Gravelle
The law commonly known as the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (P.L. 117-169) includes a 1%
Senior Specialist in
excise tax on stock repurchases by publicly traded corporations. Stock repurchases are a way to
Economic Policy
distribute income to shareholders and, compared to dividends, have favorable tax treatment. The

Joint Committee on Taxation estimates this provision to raise $74 billion over the FY2022-
FY2031 period. President Biden and several Senators have proposed to increase the rate to 4%.

A stock repurchase or buyback occurs when a firm buys its own shares, and it is an alternative to dividends as a way of
distributing earnings. Stock repurchases can take a number of forms, but the most common method is a purchase on the open
market. Buybacks were nearly nonexistent in 1982 when the Securities and Exchange Commission made open market
repurchases easier; they have grown rapidly and now exceed the value of dividends. Yardeni Research, a sell-side consulting
firm, estimated around $1 trillion in repurchases occurred in 2022 compared to $550 billion in dividends.
The excise tax imposes a 1% rate on share repurchases by publicly traded corporations, effective for repurchases after
December 31, 2022. The tax also applies to stock purchases by certain affiliates of the corporation. The value of stock issued
to the public or to employees reduces the taxable base. The tax does not apply to firms with repurchases of $1 million or less
and does not apply to regulated investment companies (RICs, such as mutual funds) or real estate investment trusts (REITs).
Exceptions to the tax include (1) repurchases that are part of tax-free corporate reorganizations; (2) repurchases that are
contributed to an employee pension plan, an employee stock ownership plan, or other similar plans; (3) repurchases that are
treated as dividends; and (4) purchases by a securities dealer in the ordinary course of business. The excise tax is not
deductible from the income tax.
Firms repurchase shares for a variety of reasons; for example, to distribute free cash flow in the face of declining investment
opportunities, to signal that their stock is undervalued, or to offset the dilution of shares from contributions of stock to
employees. From an economy-wide standpoint, repurchases are desirable if they reallocate investment more efficiently.
However, repurchase is not necessary to distribute cash, which can also be distributed via dividends or repaying debt.
Three reasons are advanced for discouraging repurchases: (1) they reduce investment and increase debt, leading to short-
termism (i.e., immediate profit at the expense of long-term investment); (2) they benefit managers by increasing earnings per
share and bonuses for executives or make stock options more valuable; and (3) they are tax-favored compared to dividends.
Some evidence supports the first two effects, although those findings have been disputed. The tax favoritism arises because
dividends are taxed in full, whereas capital gains are taxed to the seller only to the extent that price exceeds basis (the original
purchase price of the stock).
A number of repurchase issues still need clarification in Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and Treasury regulations and
guidance. On December 27, 2022, the IRS issued interim guidance on most of the issues that commentators had previously
highlighted. For example, the guidance explains how and when the tax would be collected (annually). Certain corporate
reorganizations (split-offs) that were not specifically referenced in the law are excluded from the tax, and only the amounts
not recognized (stock but not cash or property used to repurchase stock) are excluded for all tax-free corporate
reorganizations. Repurchases associated with complete liquidations are excluded (this treatment is important to special
purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs, that liquidate because they do not find a business to invest in). The guidance also
covers repurchases of preferred stock, although the IRS has asked for comments about whether special rules should apply in
some cases. In addition, the interim guidance addresses a number of other issues and further guidance is expected.

Congressional Research Service

The 1% Excise Tax on Stock Repurchases (Buybacks)

he law commonly known as the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (P.L. 117-169) includes a
1% excise tax on stock repurchases by publicly traded corporations. Stock repurchases are
T a way to distribute income to shareholders and, compared to alternative methods such as
dividends, have favorable tax treatment. The Joint Committee on Taxation estimates this
provision to raise $74 billion over the FY2022-FY2031 period.1 President Biden and Senators
Brown and Wyden have proposed to increase the rate to 4%.2
What Is a Stock Repurchase?
A stock repurchase or buyback occurs when a firm buys its own shares. A repurchase is an
alternative to paying dividends for distributing earnings to shareholders. A repurchase can be
made through several different methods:3
 a fixed-price tender offer (repurchase tender offer or RTO), where shareholders
are offered a fixed price, usually above the market price;
 a Dutch auction offer to shareholders, where shareholders indicate the lowest
price they will accept and the company chooses the highest price it will sell all
the shares offered;
 a purchase on the open market;
 a transferable put right option, where the firm offers the shareholder a right to sell
at a fixed price within a stated period, with the right transferable (traded on the
market); and
 targeted stock repurchases (direct negotiation), where shares are purchased from
shareholders of large blocks.
The Growth of Stock Repurchases
In 1982, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) provided a safe harbor from market
manipulation claims for open market purchases, as long as they do not exceed 25% of average

1 Joint Committee on Taxation, Estimated Budget Effects Of The Revenue Provisions Of Title I – Committee On
Finance, Of An Amendment In The Nature Of A Substitute To H.R. 5376, “An Act To Provide For Reconciliation
Pursuant To Title II Of S. Con. Res. 14,” As Passed By The Senate On August 7, 2022, And Scheduled For
Consideration By The House Of Representatives On August 12, 2022, JCX-18-22, August 9, 2022, https://www.jct.gov/
publications/2022/jcx-18-22/.
2 Senator Sherrod Brown, “Brown, Wyden Introduce Legislation To Increase Tax on Stock Buybacks,” press release,
February 15, 2023, https://www.brown.senate.gov/newsroom/press/release/sherrod-brown-wyden-introduce-
legislation-increase-tax-stock-
buybacks#:~:text=%E2%80%93%20Today%2C%20U.S.%20Senators%20Sherrod%20Brown%20%28D-
OH%29%20and,own%20stock%20from%20one%20percent%20to%20four%20percent.
3 See Liyu Zeng and Priscilla Luk, “Examining Share Repurchasing and the S&P Buyback Indices in the U.S. Market,”
S&P Dow Jones Indices, March 2020, https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/documents/research/research-sp-examining-
share-repurchases-and-the-sp-buyback-indices.pdf; and “Stock Buyback Methods,” Corporate Finance Institute,
October 23, 2022, https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/management/stock-buyback-methods/.
Congressional Research Service

1

The 1% Excise Tax on Stock Repurchases (Buybacks)

daily trading value.4 Currently, open market purchases are the dominant form of share
repurchases.5
With the 1982 change, stock repurchases began to grow substantially compared to dividends.
Share repurchases were almost nonexistent before 1982 and grew slowly and then more rapidly
beginning in the mid-1990s.6 In 1998, stock buybacks and dividends were around the same
magnitude (under $150 billion) for the Standard & Poor’s 500. In 2022, buybacks were almost
twice as large: $1 trillion for buybacks and $550 billion for dividends.7
In 2021, the top five firms with buybacks were Apple, Meta Platforms (formerly Facebook),
Alphabet (the parent company for Google), Microsoft, and Oracle. These five firms accounted for
28% of buybacks. Apple, with $881 billion in buybacks, was responsible for 10% of all
buybacks.8 Following the passage of the law commonly known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (P.L.
115-97),9 buybacks grew substantially in 2018, growing from $519 billion in 2017 to $806 billion
in 2018; they declined slightly in 2019 and substantially in 2020, then increased in 2021 and
2022.
Explanation of the New 1% Tax
The new provision imposes a 1% tax on the repurchase of stock by a publicly traded corporation.
The tax is an excise tax (and thus not contained in the income tax provisions of the U.S. tax code)
contained in Section 4501 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC). It is effective for repurchases after
December 31, 2022.
Repurchase Defined
Repurchase is defined as a redemption (i.e., stock received from shareholders in exchange for
property, generally cash) under Section 317 of the IRC or any transaction determined by the
Secretary of the Treasury to be economically similar. Section 317 specifies that a redemption
applies whether stock is retired, canceled, or held as treasury stock. Treasury stock is stock that
remains in existence and can be issued in the future but is not paid dividends and does not count
in measuring earnings per share.

4 Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), “Issuer Repurchases: Rule 10b-18,” at https://www.sec.gov/divisions/
marketreg/repurchases and Skadden “Capital Markets: Rule 10b-18 Safe Harbor for Stock Repurchases,” at
https://www.skadden.com/-/media/files/publications/2020/03/trading-issues-arising-out-of-market-disruptions/
rule_10b_18_safe_harbors.pdf. The rule also provided for price ceilings.
5 Liyu Zeng and Priscilla Luk, “Examining Share Repurchasing and the S&P Buyback Indices in the U.S. Market,”
S&P Dow Jones Indices, March 2020, at https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/documents/research/research-sp-
examining-share-repurchases-and-the-sp-buyback-indices.pdf.
6 Liyu Zeng and Priscilla Luk, “Examining Share Repurchasing and the S&P Buyback Indices in the U.S. Market,”
S&P Dow Jones Indices, March 2020, at https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/documents/research/research-sp-
examining-share-repurchases-and-the-sp-buyback-indices.pdf.
7 Edward Yardeni, Joe Abbott, and Mali Quintana, “Corporate Finance Briefing: S&P 500 Buybacks & Dividends,”
Yardeni Research, Inc., December 1, 2022, at https://www.yardeni.com/pub/buybackdiv.pdf.
8 “S&P 500 Buybacks Set Quarterly and Annual Record,” March 15, 2022, S&P Dow Jones Indices, at
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/sp-500-buybacks-set-quarterly-and-annual-record-301502561.html.
9 The surge in buybacks after the corporate tax cuts in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (P.L. 115-97) may have been part of
the impetus for the stock buyback tax.
Congressional Research Service

2

The 1% Excise Tax on Stock Repurchases (Buybacks)

Application to Affiliates
The excise tax would apply to purchases of a corporation’s stock by a subsidiary of the
corporation (i.e., a corporation or partnership that is more than 50% owned, directly or indirectly,
by the parent corporation). The tax also applies to purchases by a U.S. subsidiary of a foreign-
parented firm if the foreign firm is publicly traded. In addition, it applies to “surrogate” U.S.
firms owned by a foreign parent, commonly referred to as inverted firms that moved their
headquarters abroad but retained enough U.S. ownership to be subject to special restrictions.10
Netting Rule
The amount subject to tax is reduced by any new issues to the public or stock issued to employees
(referred to as the netting rule).
Tax Exceptions
There are six exceptions to the excise tax:
1. repurchases that are part of a tax-free reorganization under Section 368(a) of the
IRC (mergers, acquisitions, divisions, or other specified reorganizations), where
no gain or loss is recognized to shareholders;
2. repurchases contributed to an employee pension plan, an employee stock
ownership plan, or other similar plans;
3. repurchases of $1 million or less during the year;
4. purchases by a securities dealer in the ordinary course of business;
5. repurchases by regulated investment companies (RICs, such as mutual funds) or
real estate investment trusts (REITs); and
6. to the extent that repurchases are treated as dividends for tax purposes.11
The proposal by Senators Brown and Wyden would revise the rule excluding repurchases
contributed to employee plans, so that it would not apply to highly compensated executives (the
principal executive officer, the principle financial officer, or an executive among the three most
highly compensated employees).
Regulations and Guidance
The Secretary of the Treasury is generally authorized to provide guidance and specifically to
prevent the abuse of exceptions, address special classes of stock and preferred stock, and address
the application of the excise tax to foreign corporations.
Nondeductibility for Income Tax Purposes
In general, excise taxes can be deducted to determine profits subject to the corporate tax, which
would reduce the tax at the corporate tax rate (21%). That is, for a profitable corporation each

10 See CRS Report R43568, Corporate Expatriation, Inversions, and Mergers: Tax Issues, by Donald J. Marples and
Jane G. Gravelle for a discussion. Surrogate corporations are corporations that are 60% to 80% owned by the
shareholders of the inverted company. Corporations that are 80% or more owned are treated as U.S. firms.
11 The circumstances in which a stock redemption is treated as a dividend are in Section 302 of the Internal Revenue
Code. In general, the issue is whether the redemption is disproportionate to shareholders and whether the shareholder
holds less than 50% of the shares after the redemption.
Congressional Research Service

3

The 1% Excise Tax on Stock Repurchases (Buybacks)

dollar of excise tax reduces corporate income taxes by 21 cents. The Inflation Reduction Act
specifies (by amending Section 275 of the IRC) that this 1% excise tax would not be deductible,
thus there would be no corporate profits tax offset.
Economic Issues Relating to a Tax on Stock
Repurchases
Firms repurchase shares for numerous reasons, including to12
 distribute free cash flow in the face of declining investment opportunities;
 increase earnings per share by reducing the number of shares;
 purchase stock when it is undervalued and can subsequently be sold at a higher
price;
 signal that the stock is undervalued (although such signaling can be achieved
through increased dividends, stock repurchases may be more effective);
 realize tax benefits compared to dividends (because shareholders pay tax only on
the price less basis, or the original purchase price, as compared to dividends that
are taxed in full);
 provide financial flexibility, because all announced shares do not have to be
repurchased and do not involve all shareholders, whereas dividends are normally
at fixed times and distributed to all shareholders, and markets do not react as
negatively to a reduction in repurchases as to a reduction in dividends;
 offset the increase in outstanding shares through exercises of employee stock
options;
 defend against hostile takeovers by achieving control of shares;
 quickly adjust a firm’s capital structure, by reducing equity (and in repurchases
financed by borrowing, increase debt); and
 preserve and enhance the value of stock options.
These reasons may be desirable for the firm or its managers but not for broader purposes. From
an economy-wide perspective, stock repurchases are desirable if they lead to a more efficient
allocation of capital. This effect would occur when firms have significant excess cash flows
without desirable investments available. Returning funds to shareholders would allow the
shareholders to invest in more profitable projects. An extensive debate has developed over
whether stock repurchases serve this purpose, or reduce investment and innovation, and enrich
executives by increasing incentive pay that is based on increases in earnings per share or by
increasing the value of stock held by these executives. These latter concerns led to proposals to

12 Liyu Zeng and Priscilla Luk, “Examining Share Repurchasing and the S&P Buyback Indices in the U.S. Market,”
S&P Dow Jones Indices, March 2020, at https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/documents/research/research-sp-
examining-share-repurchases-and-the-sp-buyback-indices.pdf; CFI Team, “Stock Buyback Methods,” Corporate
Finance Institute, December 14, 2022, at https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/management/stock-buyback-
methods/; Jesse M. Fried, “Open Market Repurchases: Signaling or Managerial Opportunism?” Theoretical Inquiries in
Law, vol. 2 (2001), pp. 865-894, at http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/jfried/Open_Mkt_Shared_Resources.pdf; and
Alvin Chen and Olga A. Obizhaeva, Stock Buyback Motivations and Consequences: A Literature Review, CFA
Research Foundation, 2022, at https://www.cfainstitute.org/-/media/documents/book/rf-lit-review/2022/rflr-stock-
buybacks.pdf.
Congressional Research Service

4

The 1% Excise Tax on Stock Repurchases (Buybacks)

ban stock buybacks or impose other restrictions on buybacks.13 They also led to proposals for an
excise tax on stock repurchases. An earlier proposal would have imposed a 2% excise tax.14
An article reviewing the literature indicated that share repurchases were associated with a firm
moving from a growth pattern characterized by ample investment opportunities and limited cash
flow to a more mature stage with more cash and fewer investment opportunities. The evidence
suggested that stock buybacks were more common for firms with more volatile earnings,
consistent with the flexibility of repurchases over dividends. The review also found evidence that
repurchases occurred when share prices were lower and that they were associated with the use of
stock options.15
In general, proponents of a tax on repurchases give three reasons for discouraging stock
repurchases: (1) they divert capital from investment and encourage debt finance (which
encourages short-termism that harms long-term investment);16 (2) they benefit corporate
executives and insiders;17 and (3) they are tax favored compared to dividends while
accomplishing the same purpose of distributing earnings.
Although the tax-favorability issue is clear, other arguments are difficult to assess. For example,
stock buybacks could be associated with declining investment, but whether that is because
declining investment opportunities lead to buybacks or buybacks reduce funds available for
investment is not easy to determine (although there are statistical techniques that attempt to
address this issue).18 Similarly, large buybacks may be more common in firms that rely heavily on
stock options, but buybacks could be employed to reverse the dilution of stock with the exercise
of stock options or they could be used to enhance the value of stock when executives are planning
to sell stock.
Do Stock Repurchases Reduce Investment and Increase Debt?
In 2016 and 2017, an estimated 30% of buybacks were financed by debt. In these cases, a firm
does not acquire assets to create profits to pay interest on the debt.19 However, the tax law favors

13 For an overview of this debate, see Joshua Zelen, “Goodbye Buybacks: Why Recent Stock Buyback Reform
Proposals Go Beyond What is Necessary,” Fordham Journal of Corporate and Financial Law, vol. 28 (2022), pp. 01-
326, at https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/jcfl/vol27/iss1/7/. The author proposes regulatory changes to increase disclosure.
President Biden also proposed to prohibit executives from selling shares in the years after a buyback. See Office of
Management and Budget, Budget of the U.S. Government, Fiscal Year 2023, p. 16, at https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-
content/uploads/2022/03/budget_fy2023.pdf.
14 Senator Sherrod Brown, “Brown, Wyden Unveil Major New Legislation to Tax Stock Buybacks,” press release,
September 10, 2021, at https://www.brown.senate.gov/newsroom/press/release/brown-wyden-tax-stock-buybacks.
15 Alvin Chen and Olga A. Obizhaeva, Stock Buyback Motivations and Consequences: A Literature Review, CFA
Research Foundation, 2022, at https://www.cfainstitute.org/-/media/documents/book/rf-lit-review/2022/rflr-stock-
buybacks.pdf.
16 See CRS In Focus IF11393, Stock Buybacks: Concerns over Debt-Financing and Long-Term Investing, by Gary
Shorter.
17 See CRS In Focus IF11506, Stock Buybacks and Company Executives’ Profits, by Gary Shorter.
18 When the dependent and independent variables are mutually related, this effect is termed endogeneity. Endogeneity
is sometimes addressed by using lagged values for the independent variable or using instrumental variables (i.e., a
variable that is correlated with the independent variable but not the dependent variable).
19 William Lazonick, Mustafa Erdem Sakinç, and Matt Hopkins, “Why Stock Buybacks Are Dangerous for the
Economy,” Harvard Business Review, January 7, 2020, pp. 2-7, at https://hbr.org/2020/01/why-stock-buybacks-are-
dangerous-for-the-economy.
Congressional Research Service

5

The 1% Excise Tax on Stock Repurchases (Buybacks)

debt finance and rebalancing the relationship between debt and equity may be desirable for the
firm.
Some studies have suggested that buybacks do discourage investment and increase debt, although
the evidence is mixed.20 An International Monetary Fund study indicated that debt funded payouts
weaken credit quality and that the increase in dividends and buybacks slow investment.21 Other
studies have also concluded that share repurchases reduce investment.22 In addition, some
evidence shows that repurchases suppress innovation23 and are associated with a short-term
focus.24 However, another study found that, in the aggregate, taking into account new issues of
stock, stock repurchases were 41% of earnings, leaving ample funds for investment.25
While there is evidence that repurchases reduce investment, it is less clear whether this is an
undesirable effect, as it depends on the relative returns to displaced and new investment.
However, firms could return funds to stockholders by paying higher dividends, so that
repurchases are not necessary to achieve the goal of distributing cash when viable investment
opportunities are not available.
Moreover, another way of distributing cash is to pay back debt, so that debt-financed repurchases
or repurchases with the existence of debt would not appear to be required for the purpose of using
free cash flow.
Stock Repurchases and Executive Compensation
Evidence also suggests that buybacks may benefit executives in two different ways. First,
bonuses may be based on earnings per share that can be enhanced by stock buybacks. Second, for
executives holding shares, stock buybacks increase the value of shares.26

20 See CRS In Focus IF11393, Stock Buybacks: Concerns over Debt-Financing and Long-Term Investing, by Gary
Shorter, which reviews some of the evidence.
21 International Monetary Fund, Global Financial Stability Report, October 2019, at https://www.imf.org/en/
Publications/GFSR/Issues/2019/10/01/global-financial-stability-report-october-2019.
22 See Heitor Almeida, Vyacheslav Fos, and Mathias Kronlund, “The Real Effects of Share Repurchases,” Journal of
Financial Economics, vol. 19, iss. 1 (January 2016), pp. 168-185. A working paper version is available at
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2276156. See also Alok Bhargava, Executive Compensation,
Share Repurchases and Investment Expenditures: Econometric Evidence from US firms, Review of Quantitative
Finance and Accounting, vol. 40 (2013), pp. 403-442; Douglas O. Cook and Weiwei Zhang, “CEO Option Incentives
and Corporate Share Repurchases,” International Review of Economics and Finance, vol. 78 (March 2022), pp. 355-
376, at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1059056021002501; and Germán Gutiérrez and Thomas
Philippon, “Ownership, Concentration, and Investment,” AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Review,
vol. 108 (2018), pp. 432-437.
23 Tim Swift, “Do Stock Buybacks Suppress Innovation,” International Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 26,
no. 6 (August 2022), at https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/epdf/10.1142/S1363919622500372. The working paper
version can be accessed at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
326275372_Do_Share_Buybacks_Suppress_Corporate_Innovation.
24 David Bendig, Daniel Willmann, Steffen Strese, and Malte Brettel, “Share Repurchases and Myopia: Implications on
the Stock and Consumer Markets,” Journal of Marketing, vol. 82 (March 2018), pp. 19-41.
25 Jesse M. Fried and Charles C.Y. Wang, “Short- Termism and Capital Flows,” Review of Corporate Finance Studies,
vol. 8, no. 1 (2019), pp. 207-233, at https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=55334.
26 See CRS In Focus IF11506, Stock Buybacks and Company Executives’ Profits, by Gary Shorter. See also Douglas O.
Cook and Weiwei Zhang, “CEO Option Incentives and Corporate Share Repurchases,” International Review of
Economics and Finance, vol. 78 (March 2022), pp. 355-376; Francine McKenna, “SEC’s Jackson Says Research He’s
Conducted Shows Corporate Insiders Are Using Buybacks To Cash Out,” MarketWatch, March 6, 2019, at
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/secs-jackson-says-research-hes-conducted-shows-corporate-insiders-are-using-
buybacks-to-cash-out-2019-03-06; Alok Bhargava, “Executive Compensation, Share Repurchases and Investment
Congressional Research Service

6

The 1% Excise Tax on Stock Repurchases (Buybacks)

A 2008 study found a close relationship between stock repurchases and stock option
compensation. The study found that a large share of past repurchases had been to reduce the
dilution of stock due to exercising stock options and that firms chose repurchases over dividends
because dividends reduced stock values and repurchases increased those values, which has the
further effect of encouraging the exercise of stock options.27 Another study indicated that the
primary reason for stock repurchases was to offset the dilution of shares from stock options and
that the cost should be considered part of employee compensation.28
The findings in some studies that executives sold more stock in the days after a repurchase
announcement are considered compelling evidence by some,29 although it is also understandable
that stock repurchases could be used to eliminate the dilution of stock due to the exercise of
employee stock options.
Favorable Tax Treatment of Stock Repurchases
Although these first two effects are subject to some dispute, the tax-favored nature of stock
repurchases compared to dividends is clear. This advantage has been reduced since dividends and
capital gains were subject to the same tax rates in 2003. Nevertheless, capital gains are reduced
by the basis (original purchase price), whereas all dividends are subject to tax. Some of this
benefit defers the tax if any newly acquired stock is sold, as its basis is increased, but tax can also
be forgiven if stock is passed on at death. This tax favoritism had led to a proposal by Senator
Marco Rubio to treat stock repurchases as a dividend to all shareholders.30
How significant is the 1% tax in reducing the differential between the treatment of capital gains
and dividends? The tax is small compared to the overall 23.8% tax rate that applies to the highest
income taxpayers (i.e., a 20% rate on dividends and capital gains plus a 3.8% tax on net
investment income), increasing the tax rate by about 4%. The 1% tax increases in significance for
two reasons. First, the differential tax depends on the basis for stock sold in the repurchase.
Although the basis varies significantly, for long-term gain transactions, the average basis was
65% of sales price in the latest year available, 2015.31 Thus, the overall tax on the amount of

Expenditures: Econometric Evidence from US firms,” Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, vol. 40 (2013),
pp. 403-442; and “Stock Buyback Ability to Enhance CEO Compensation: Theory, Evidence and Policy Implications,”
Lewis and Clark Law Review, vol. 25, no. 1 (2021), pp. 305-359, at https://law.lclark.edu/live/files/31608-10-shilon-
article-251pdf.
27 David N. Hurtt, Jerry G. Kreuze, and Sheldon A. Langsam, “Stock Buybacks and Their Association with Stock
Options Exercised in the IT Industry,” American Journal of Business, vol. 2, no. 1 (Spring 2008), pp. 13-21, at
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/19355181200800001/full/pdf.
28 Edward Yardeni and Joseph Abbott, Stock Buybacks: The True Story, Yardeni Research Inc., May 20, 2019, at
https://www.yardeni.com/pub/TS84.pdf.
29 See, for example, the evidence from a study by SEC Commissioner Robert J. Jackson, Jr., “Stock Buybacks and
Corporate Cashouts,” news speech, June 11, 2018, at https://www.sec.gov/news/speech/speech-jackson-061118.
30 Marco Rubio, “America Needs to Restore Dignity of Work,” The Atlantic, December 12, 2018,
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/12/help-working-class-voters-us-must-value-work/578032/ and Marco
Rubio, Rubio Releases Report Outlining China’s Plan for Global Dominance and Why America Must Respond, Press
Release, February 12, 2019, https://www.rubio.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?p=Press-Releases&id=BC6C0054-7C4E-
4012-A1FD-26A24AE16C0D. For additional details of how the proposal would work, see Matt Egan, Marco “Rubio
Wants to End Stock Buybacks’ Tax Advantage, CNN Business, February 12, 2019, https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/12/
investing/rubio-stock-buybacks-tax/index.html.
31 Janette Wilson and Christopher Williams, “Sales of Capital Assets Data Reported on Individual Tax Returns, Tax
Years 2013-2015,” Internal Revenue Service Statistics of Income Bulletin, winter 2022, at https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-
prior/p1136—2022.pdf#page=134.
Congressional Research Service

7

The 1% Excise Tax on Stock Repurchases (Buybacks)

income received would be 8.33%, for a 15.47 percentage point difference due to the savings in
basis. A 1% tax would narrow that difference by 6%.
Second, a significant share of stock is held by tax-exempt entities and tax-favored accounts, such
as pension funds, who pay no capital gains or dividend taxes, or by foreign shareholders who do
not pay capital gains tax and typically pay a 15% rate on dividends (although they may pay tax in
their own country). Estimates indicate that about 25% of stock is held by taxable shareholders and
40% by foreign shareholders.32 Thus, the tax on dividends averaged across all shareholders is
11.95% (25% of 23.8% plus 40% of 15%). The average tax rate on capital gains is 2.0825% (25%
times 8.33%). Overall, the differential is 9.8675 percentage points. Thus, a 1% tax would reduce
the differential by 10%. These calculations assume no tax by foreign countries on capital gains
and dividends. If the tax differential were the same as U.S. taxable shareholders, the differential
would be about the same, 10% (65% of 15.47%).
In both cases, the differential would be slightly different because some taxable shareholders are
not taxed at the top rate (reducing the differential) and some shares may be short-term and taxed
at ordinary rates (increasing the differential). Generally, however, these shares would be relatively
small and the effects roughly offsetting.
Because the additional tax is relatively small, the effect on paying out dividends would be
expected to be relatively small. A 2021 study estimated that a 1% tax would increase dividends by
1.5%.33
This number only reflects averages based on observations of aggregate capital gains behavior and
stock holding. For firms where the capital gains advantage is especially small, the tax would be
more significant, whereas for other firms it would be smaller.
Regulatory Issues
There has been extensive and detailed commentary about guidance needed to implement the
excise tax, including comments by the American Bar Association (ABA) and the New York State
Bar Association (NYSBA) tax sections.34 Three issues had been identified as particularly urgent
for practitioners: how and when to pay the tax; the treatment of certain split-offs in corporate
reorganizations and special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) liquidations; and the
characterization of preferred stock.35 Another commentator specifically identified two issues as
important: (1) split-offs, the treatment of corporate reorganizations with compensation in both

32 Steve Rosenthal and Theo Burke, “Who’s Left to Tax? US Taxation of Corporations and Their Shareholders,”
presented at the New York University Tax Policy Colloquium, October 27, 2020, at https://www.law.nyu.edu/sites/
default/files/
Who%E2%80%99s%20Left%20to%20Tax%3F%20US%20Taxation%20of%20Corporations%20and%20Their%20Sh
areholders-%20Rosenthal%20and%20Burke.pdf.
33 Thornton Matheson and Thomas Brody, 1% Buyback Tax Could Lead to Higher Dividend Payouts, Tax Policy
Center, December 20, 2021, at https://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxvox/1-buyback-tax-could-lead-higher-dividend-
payouts.
34 American Bar Association (ABA), Section on Taxation, “Comments on Section 4501 Excise Tax,” December 7,
2022, at https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/taxation/policy/2022/120722comments.pdf; and
New York State Bar Association (NYSBA), Report on the Section 4501 Excise Tax on Repurchases of Corporate
Stock, Report No. 1469, November 1, 2022, at https://nysba.org/app/uploads/2022/11/1469-Report-on-the-Section-
4501-Excise-Tax-on-Repurchases-of-Corporate-Stock.pdf.
35 See David van den Berg, “3 Issues Tax Pros Want Clarified In Buyback Tax Guidance,” Law 360, October 12, 2022,
at https://www.law360.com/tax-authority/articles/1539127/3-issues-tax-pros-want-clarified-in-buyback-tax-guidance.
Congressional Research Service

8

The 1% Excise Tax on Stock Repurchases (Buybacks)

stock and boot (i.e., cash or property) and (2) certain leveraged buyout transactions that take a
company private.36
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) subsequently provided interim guidance.37 This guidance
addressed the issues noted above and others such as exceptions from redemptions in Section 317
of the IRC, a list of transactions deemed economically similar and those deemed not
economically similar, statutory exceptions, and fair market value. However, it omitted other
concerns, which may be dealt with in future guidance.
Tax Computation and Payment
Form and Timing
The excise tax is not part of income tax provisions, so there are no automatic rules for how the tax
is to be paid, or how often. The IRS interim guidance indicates that the tax will be paid annually
on the excise tax Form 720 due the first quarter after the end of the firm’s taxable year. The IRS
guidance notes that while the tax on repurchases is effective after December 31, 2022,
repurchases are offset by new issues of stock during the taxable year. Thus for taxpayers with a
tax year straddling the effective date, all new issues during that tax year will be used to offset post
December 31, 2022 repurchases. (This is part of the IRS’s explanation of the law and not
regulatory guidance.)
Fair Market Value
The interim guidance specifies that the value of the purchase is the market price on the date the
shares ownership is transferred, which is the trade day for issues and repurchases. Market price
may be a volume weighted daily average, the closing price, the average of the high and low price,
or the trading price at the time of sale. This guidance, thus, addresses circumstances when prices
actually paid differ from fair market prices, including accelerated share repurchases where a firm
enters into a contract with an investment bank to purchase a large block of shares when the
contractual price may differ from the market value, or tender offers that exceed market prices.
The market price will determine the basis for the tax.
For repurchased stock contributed to employee retirement plans under the exception to the tax,
the value of stock is the fair market value when repurchased up to the amount of the total
repurchases in the year if the stock is in the same class. If the stock class contributed differs from
that repurchased, the value of the shares contributed is the market value at the time of
contribution.

36 Donald Bakke, Marc Countryman, and Shane Kiggen, “Inflation Reduction Act Revised To Include Excise Tax On
Stock Buybacks,” Ernst and Young, LLP, August 8, 2022, at https://taxnews.ey.com/news/2022-1206-inflation-
reduction-act-revised-to-include-excise-tax-on-stock-buybacks.
37 Internal Revenue Service, “Initial Guidance Regarding the Application of the Excise Tax on Repurchases of
Corporate Stock under Section 4501 of the Internal Revenue Code,” Notice 2023-2, December 27, 2022, at
https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-23-02.pdf. For a more detailed discussion that links to sections of the notice, see
Paul/Weiss, “IRS Issues Guidance on Excise Tax on Stock Repurchases and Corporate Alternative Minimum Tax,”
December 29, 2022, at https://www.paulweiss.com/practices/transactional/tax/publications/irs-issues-guidance-on-
excise-tax-on-stock-repurchases-and-corporate-alternative-minimum-tax?id=45658. See also DavisPolk, “IRS Issues
Interim Guidance On the Stock Repurchase Excise Tax,” December 28, 2022, https://www.davispolk.com/insights/
client-update/irs-issues-interim-guidance-stock-repurchase-excise-tax.
Congressional Research Service

9

The 1% Excise Tax on Stock Repurchases (Buybacks)

$1 Million Exception
The determination of the exemption from the tax if repurchases are $1 million or less is made
before the reduction for exceptions and before the netting out of issues, that is, gross repurchases.
Redemptions That Are Not Repurchases
A redemption is receipt of a stock from a shareholder for property (e.g., cash). Two cases are
identified in the interim guidance where a redemption will not be considered a repurchase.
Brother-Sister (Section 304) Purchases
The excise tax applies to subsidiaries that purchase the parent stock, but there was a question
about whether the tax would cover brother-sister corporations (i.e., two corporations controlled
by the same shareholders). Under the interim guidance, brother-sister stock purchases (where a
corporation purchases stock of another corporation from shareholders that control both
corporations) will not be considered repurchases (even though such a purchase is treated as a
redemption for other purposes) and will be exempt from the tax.
Fractional Shares
Cash for fractional shares is not included in the tax if part of a reorganization or settlement of an
option or other financial instrument.
Corporate Liquidations and Special Purpose Acquisition
Companies
A firm may repurchase shares in a full liquidation (which means the firm ceases to operate), a
partial liquidation in accordance with a plan of full liquidation, or a partial liquidation where part
of the businesses ceases. Qualifying liquidations are taxed as if shares are sold and thus taxed as
capital gains, although payments in a partial liquidation to corporate shareholders are treated as
dividends. The interim guidance indicates that complete liquidations are not generally subject to
the excise tax.38 However, repurchases from individual shareholders are subject to the tax when
connected with the liquidation of a subsidiary where one of the shareholders is a corporation that
controls at least 80% of shares.
In earlier comments, the ABA had taken the position that a pro rata (although not a non-pro rata)
partial liquidation should be excluded from the tax, whereas the NYSBA had argued that all pro
rata distributions be excluded, thus taking a similar position on partial liquidations.39 The interim
guidance indicates that partial liquidations will be subject to the tax.
Commentators were particularly concerned about the treatment of special purpose acquisition
companies (SPACs).40 SPACs are formed to generate cash by investors (through an initial public
offering) for the purpose of buying active businesses within a specified period, generally two
years. If no business is purchased, the stock is repurchased (which would be a complete

38 However, distributions to shareholders that are also associated with a liquidation of a subsidiary are subject to the
tax.
39 The ABA had indicated a case could be made for the exclusion of non-pro rata partial liquidation distributions to
noncorporate shareholders, although it would complicate the identification of exempt and nonexempt repurchases
through pass-through entities that may have both individual and corporate partners.
40 See CRS In Focus IF11655, SPAC IPO: Background and Policy Issues, by Eva Su for a discussion of SPACs.
Congressional Research Service

10

The 1% Excise Tax on Stock Repurchases (Buybacks)

liquidation). In addition, stockholders generally have the right to sell their shares (e.g., if they do
not like the business acquired) back at the original price.
The exemption of complete liquidations addresses concerns raised about SPACs that do not
acquire businesses. The ABA recommended that in addition to exempting stock in liquidation, a
SPAC’s repurchase of shares, where the holder has a put right (i.e., a right to sell at a specified
price), be excluded from the tax, as these repurchases are not causing the problems that motivated
the tax. The NYSBA does not make specific recommendations but proposes transition relief for
SPACS formed prior to the effective date. The interim guidance did not indicate an exception for
these repurchases under put rights or transition relief for SPACs.
Reorganizations and Split-ups
The law specifically excludes tax-free corporate reorganizations outlined in Section 368(a) of the
IRC, which include mergers, acquisition, divisions, and other forms of reorganization. In tax-free
reorganizations, gain is not generally recognized when compensation is in stock (e.g.,
shareholders of the target company in an acquisition redeem their stock for stock of the acquiring
company). Gain is recognized to the extent shareholders are compensated in cash or other
property (called “boot”).
Commentators raised two issues. One is whether reorganizations will be completely exempt from
the tax or only stock compensation and not boot would be excluded. The other concern is certain
split-offs that are governed by another section of the tax code, Section 355. Divisions can take
place under either section and constitute the same type of distribution, but the statute only refers
to Section 368. Divisions can take place as spin-offs (where stock of a subsidiary is distributed
pro rata to the shareholders), which does not involve a repurchase. However, divisions can take
place as split-offs where the subsidiary’s stock is exchanged for the parent company’s stock,
which may also involve payment of cash or property (boot).
The regulation and examples clarify that the exception for tax-free reorganizations under Section
368 excludes stock transferred in these reorganizations from the tax but not any boot that is
exchanged for stock and subject to gain. It also confirms that Section 355 split-ups are subject to
the exclusion as well.
Leveraged Buyouts
When a private equity company uses a leveraged buyout to take a public firm private, the
mechanics of the operation may result in the target being treated as borrowing the funds and
payments to the target’s shareholder from the target’s debt proceeds are treated as redemptions.41
The ABA suggests that the excise tax should not apply to redemptions if, after the transactions,
the firm’s shares are no longer publicly traded. This treatment also would allow firms to use
simpler, rather than more complicated, methods to take firms private. However, the example in
the interim guidance indicates that these types of leveraged buyouts will be subject to the excise
tax.
The Exception for Redemptions Treated as Dividends
The excise tax does not apply to a repurchase that is treated as a dividend. A dividend is a
payment in cash or property and under certain circumstances a repurchase (where the payment is

41 This type of acquisition involves an acquiring company that creates a subsidiary that then merges into the target, and
the target borrows funds to repurchase the shares. This method is also called a “bootstrap acquisition.”
Congressional Research Service

11

The 1% Excise Tax on Stock Repurchases (Buybacks)

made in exchange for stock) is also treated as a dividend. One of those circumstances occurs
when repurchases are substantially proportionate to shares. A dividend is taxed as dividend
income up to the earnings and profits in the year in which the dividend is paid (a tax dividend). If
the dividend is larger than earnings and profits, it reduces the basis of stocks and if it exceeds
basis generates a capital gain (a non-dividend distribution).
Commentators raised the issue of whether non-dividend distributions would be subject to the tax.
The interim guidance indicates that only the part of the repurchase that is actually taxed as a
dividend will reduce share repurchases subject to the tax and not the part that reduces basis or
capital gain.42 This treatment is consistent with a motivation relating to the tax-preferred nature of
repurchases.
Netting Issues
In General
Some issuances of stocks are not counted for purposes of netting against repurchases. These
include circumstances (such as corporate reorganizations, brother-sister transactions, and
fractional shares) that also are not included in repurchases. It also excludes distributions of stock
to the corporation’s shareholders and issuances of stock to subsidiaries. Offsetting issues cannot
be carried back or forward, but apply only in the taxable year of the purchases.
Stock Issued to Employees (Including Affiliates’ Employees)
Restricted stock subject to vesting is counted as issued when vested, although if the employee
elects to include the amounts in income when granted, the stock is considered issued when
granted. Withholding of shares to account for income and employment taxes reduces issues. For
stock options, stock is issued when the option is exercised. If the exercise price is provided in
cash, the full amount of the shares are issued, but if there is withholding of shares to cover the
exercise price, the issue is reduced by those shares.
Special Classes of Stock and Preferred Stock; Other Securities
Commentators raised numerous issues about what types of securities would be covered by the
tax, such as preferred stock (both straight and convertible), convertible debt, and warrants. The
interim guidance appears to apply the repurchase rules to all stocks, including preferred stock,
although the IRS requested comment on this issue.

42 Both the ABA and NYSBA addressed whether non-dividend distributions should be subject to the tax (as they do not
give rise to dividend taxes). The ABA indicates that non-dividend distributions that arise from simple payments in cash
or property (normal dividends) should not be covered, as they do not affect the shares of stock outstanding. However, it
suggests that non-dividend distributions that arise from redemptions that are treated as dividends should be included as
they affect the number of shares. This is the position taken in IRS’s interim guidance. The NYSBA takes the general
position that all 100% pro-rata distributions should be excluded because they do not affect the proportionate interests of
shareholders. These choices reflect the various importance of ownership dilution, changes in the number of shares, and
the relative tax treatment. Cash dividends do not dilute ownership or affect shares but may not always be taxed. Non-
dividend distributions treated as dividends out of earnings and profits do not dilute ownership, do increase shares, but
are taxed in full. Non-dividend distributions that are treated as dividends and exceed earnings and profits do not dilute
ownership but do increase shares and are not taxed in full.
Congressional Research Service

12

The 1% Excise Tax on Stock Repurchases (Buybacks)

Comments Requested for Certain Issues
The interim guidance has numerous issues where commentary is invited (both on issues discussed
and not discussed in the interim guidance), some quite technical in nature but others relating to
broader policy issues.
Among the issues mentioned is the treatment of special issues of securities, including preferred
stock and convertible debt, as well as options. With respect to the treatment of financial
instruments, the NYSBA recommended that unexercised options not be treated as issued. It also
recommended that redemptions of straight preferred stock be excluded from the excise tax but not
participating preferred stock (including convertible preferred stock). It suggested that guidance
clarify that, in general, convertible debt and distressed debt are not “stock” subject to the excise
tax. The ABA requested guidance that debt instruments be categorized under common principles
(convertible debt is generally characterized as debt, not equity) and that options and warrants
(rights to buy at a specified price) be included at exercise and at fair market value. The ABA also
noted that a class of preferred stock that allows the issuer to repurchase on its own terms (a call
option) be included under the tax but that a preferred stock or common stock option that allows
the owner to sell at a particular price (a put option) not be included.
Comments were requested on some matters relating to price, including whether a value other than
market price should be used, how to deal with pricing of stocks traded in multiple markets, and
dealing with cases where multiple classes are repurchased and contributed to employee plans. The
ABA discussion indicates that the term fair market value is a reference to trading price, rather
than a negotiated price. The NYSBA indicates that the statute implies that the price be the actual
price received (if reflecting an arms-length negotiation with an unrelated party) and otherwise
market price.
The interim guidance also requested comments relating to various aspects of the exceptions and
exclusions, including whether exceptions for employer-provided retirement plans should include
plans that are not qualified (under Section 401 of the IRC); the nature of evidence needed to
demonstrate that a redemption is treated as a dividend; and special rules for redemptions of
bankrupted or troubled companies. The ABA recommended treatment be extended to
nonqualified plans.
Comments were requested on a variety of other issues as well. These issues included determining
indirect ownership for purposes of defining an affiliate, treatment of repurchases in the period
before a company becomes a covered corporation or after it is no longer covered, allocation of
repurchases among components of inverted surrogate companies, treatment of foreign
partnerships, definition of established securities market, and treatment of trading through
depository receipts.

Author Information

Jane G. Gravelle

Senior Specialist in Economic Policy

Congressional Research Service

13

The 1% Excise Tax on Stock Repurchases (Buybacks)

Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan
shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and
under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other
than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in
connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not
subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in
its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or
material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to
copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.

Congressional Research Service
R47397 · VERSION 4 · UPDATED
14