link to page 2 
Updated December 13, 2022
Defense Primer: Under Secretary of Defense for Research and
Engineering
Advances in science and technology have long played a
Furthermore, in the conference report (H.Rept. 114-840) for
critical role in ensuring the technological preeminence of
the FY2017 NDAA, the conferees stated their expectation
the United States military. For this reason, the Department
that the USD (R&E) “would take risks, press the
of Defense (DOD) is the largest funder of federal research
technology envelope, test and experiment, and have the
and development. The Under Secretary of Defense for
latitude to fail, as appropriate.”
Research and Engineering (USD (R&E)) is a civilian
official reporting directly to the Secretary of Defense. The
Roles and Responsibilities of the USD
USD (R&E) serves as the principal advisor to the Secretary
(R&E)
of Defense for DOD research, engineering, and technology
The powers and duties of the USD (R&E) include
development activities and programs.
serving as the chief technology officer (CTO) of DOD
Over the last several years, policymakers and others have
with the mission of advancing technology and
expressed concern that the long-held technological edge of
innovation for the military services and DOD;
the U.S. military is eroding due, in part, to the proliferation
establishing policies on, and supervising all defense
of technologies outside the defense sector, organizational
research and engineering, technology development,
and cultural barriers to DOD effectively incorporating and
technology transition, appropriate prototyping activities,
exploiting commercial innovations, and insufficient
experimentation, and developmental testing activities
engagement with leading-edge companies that have not
and programs, and unifying defense research and
historically been a part of the DOD innovation system. The
engineering efforts across DOD; and
position of the USD (R&E) as the third highest ranking
serving as the principal advisor to the Secretary of
DOD official—behind the Secretary and Deputy
Defense on all research, engineering, and technology
Secretary—is intended to promote faster innovation and to
development activities and programs in DOD.
increase risk-tolerance in the pursuit of new technologies.
Department of Defense Directive (DODD) 5137.02
Origin of the USD (R&E) Position
specifies 45 key functions and responsibilities of the USD
(R&E) and defines the authorities of the USD (R&E) and
Leadership of DOD research, engineering, and technology
his or her relationships with other senior DOD officials.
development activities and functions within the Office of
The responsibilities detailed in DODD 5137.02 include
the Secretary of Defense (OSD) have varied over the course
of DOD’s history.
managing the DOD science and technology (S&T) portfolio
For example, there was a USD (R&E)
to address near-term and far-term capability gaps against
from 1977 to 1986. Reestablishment of the position of the
emerging threats and ensuring that DOD technical
USD (R&E) in 2016 through the National Defense
infrastructure, scientific and engineering capabilities, and
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (FY2017 NDAA,
associated resources align with DOD priorities.
P.L. 114-328) represents the most recent realignment.
In the FY2022 NDAA (S. 1605), Congress designated the
Specifically, P.L. 114-328 eliminated the position of the
USD (R&E) as the Chief Technical Advisor to the Joint
Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology,
Requirements Oversight Council (JROC) with the intent of
and Logistics (USD (AT&L)) and established the positions
assisting DOD “in taking full advantage of technological
of USD (R&E) and the Under Secretary of Defense for
possibilities, on-ramping new technologies into military
Acquisition and Sustainment (USD (A&S)).
operations, and identifying new, affordable, and effective
In reestablishing the position of USD (R&E) the Senate
means of achieving military ends.” S. 1605 also required an
Armed Services Committee stated (S.Rept. 114-255)
independent study and report to Congress on the role of the
USD (R&E) in the JROC, including possible adjustments.
The committee expects that just as previous USD
(R&E) incumbents led the so-called “Second
Organizational Structure of the OUSD
Offset” strategy, which successfully enabled the
(R&E)
United States to leap ahead of the Soviet Union in
The organizational and management structure of the office
terms of military technology, the new USD (R&E)
of the USD (R&E) (OUSD (R&E)) has evolved numerous
would be tasked with driving the key technologies
times from the original structure proposed in a 2017 DOD
that must encompass what defense leaders are now
report to Congress and from the structure approved by the
calling a “Third Offset” strategy: cyber and space
Deputy Secretary of Defense in a memorandum dated July
capabilities, unmanned systems, directed energy,
13, 2018. As shown in Figure 1, currently, the OUSD
undersea warfare, hypersonics, and robotics, among
(R&E) has three main subcomponents:
others.
https://crsreports.congress.gov
Defense Primer: Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering
A Deputy CTO for S&T responsible for oversight of
Some have expressed concerns that dividing the roles and
DOD’s S&T enterprise, including its S&T workforce
responsibilities of the USD (AT&L) into an USD (R&E)
and laboratory infrastructure; management and
and an USD (A&S) will exacerbate the valley of death (i.e.,
administration of a broad portfolio of S&T programs,
the barriers and challenges that exist in bringing a new
including basic research, the Small Business Innovation
technology from the research laboratory to full scale
Research and Small Business Technology Transfer
deployment in the armed forces).
programs, and DOD’s Manufacturing Innovation
In the conference report (H.Rept. 114-840) for the FY2017
Institutes; and efforts related to technology and program
NDAA, the conferees acknowledged the potential
protection.
challenges that exist in separating the roles and
A Deputy CTO for Critical Technologies responsible for
responsibilities of the USD (AT&L) into the positions of a
managing the capability analysis and investments for
USD (R&E) and a USD (A&S). However, the conference
DOD’s 11 critical technologies which include 5G;
report asserts that elevating the missions of advancing
advanced computing and software; directed energy;
technology and innovation within DOD, fostering distinct
human-machine interfaces; hypersonics; integrated
technology and acquisition cultures to better deliver
network systems-of-systems; integrated sensing and
superior capabilities, and providing greater oversight and
cyber; microelectronics; renewable energy generation
management of DOD components outside the military
and storage; space technology; and trusted artificial
services would best be addressed by the creation of two
intelligence and autonomy.
undersecretaries. Furthermore, the conferees indicated that
A Deputy CTO for Mission Capabilities responsible for
any potential barriers or gaps could “be mitigated through
identifying, incubating, and transitioning technologies,
effective leadership and management.”
systems, and system of systems that close time-critical
gaps in high-priority, multi-component missions to
In an effort to bridge gaps between the two offices, DODD
maintain United States’ technological superiority.
5137.02 details their relationship, including requiring the
In addition, a number of agencies within DOD’s research
USD (R&E) to advise the USD (A&S) on materiel
development, milestone, and production decisions.
and engineering enterprise are overseen by the OUSD
(R&E). Specifically, the Defense Advanced Research
Relevant Statutes
Projects Agency, the Defense Innovation Unit, the Missile
Title 10, U.S. Code, Chapter 4—Office of the Secretary of
Defense Agency, and the Space Development Agency
Defense
report to the USD (R&E).
CRS Products
USD (R&E) and USD (A&S) Relationship
CRS In Focus IF10553, Defense Primer: RDT&E.
A wide range of observers see a close and cooperative
CRS Report R45403, The Global Research and Development
relationship between the USD (R&E) and the USD (A&S)
Landscape and Implications for the Department of Defense.
as critical for the efficient and effective delivery of
CRS Report R45068, Acquisition Reform in the FY2016-FY2018
advanced technologies to the warfighter, especially at the
National Defense Authorization Acts (NDAAs).
fast pace many expect is needed to maintain the U.S.
technological lead over potential adversaries.
Figure 1. Organizational Chart for Office of USD (R&E)
Sources: Adapted from https://www.cto.mil/leadership/ and https://www.cto.mil/wp-
content/uploads/2022/05/usdre_org_chart_09may2022_distro_a.pdf (accessed on December 5, 2022).
Notes: This represents a simplified version of the organizational structure of the OUSD (R&E). DIU = Defense Innovation Unit; MDA = Missile
Defense Agency; DARPA = Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency; SDA = Space Developmental Agency. MDA, DARPA, and SDA are
distinct and separate DOD agencies that report to the USD (R&E). Others are wholly within the OUSD (R&E).
Marcy E. Gallo, Analyst in Science and Technology Policy
https://crsreports.congress.gov
Defense Primer: Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering
IF10834
Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress.
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.
https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF10834 · VERSION 11 · UPDATED