Comparing DHS Component Funding,
FY2023: In Brief
August 22, 2022
Congressional Research Service
https://crsreports.congress.gov
R47220

Comparing DHS Component Funding, FY2023: In Brief

he Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act includes all annual
appropriations for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), providing resources to
T every departmental component. Its accompanying conference report or explanatory
statement provides guidance for the department, including how DHS should account for
reprogramming and transferring a range of non-appropriated funds. Together, these documents
form a snapshot of a significant portion of the DHS budget. This report reviews that snapshot at
the DHS component level, comparing
 the budget authority outlined in the FY2022 annual appropriations measure;1
 annual appropriations requested by the Joseph R. Biden Jr. Administration for
FY2023;
 funding levels recommended by the House Appropriations Committee in H.R.
8257 and H.Rept. 117-396; and
 funding levels proposed by the Senate Appropriations Committee in the
committee draft released on July 28, 2022 (later introduced as S. 4678), and its
accompanying explanatory statement.2
The report makes note of advance and supplemental appropriations provided through various
measures for FY2022 and FY2023, but identifies such funding distinctly, to allow for clear
comparison on the annual appropriations packages. The report makes special note of “net
discretionary appropriations” for DHS—a perspective on the net impact the legislation that funds
DHS has on congressionally-tracked budget totals.3
The FY2023 DHS Appropriations Process
Annual Appropriations
On March 28, 2022, the Biden Administration released its annual budget request for FY2023,
including a $97.29 billion budget request for the Department of Homeland Security. By the
Congressional Budget Office’s (CBO’s) initial estimation, the request included $56.64 billion in
adjusted net discretionary appropriations and $19.74 billion in disaster relief-designated funds.4
This was $0.99 billion less than was enacted for DHS in FY2022.
 On June 24, 2022, the House Committee on Appropriations marked up H.R.
8257, its version of the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act,
2023. H.Rept. 117-396 was filed on July 1, 2022. Committee-reported H.R. 8257
included $60.27 billion in adjusted net discretionary budget authority. This was

1 P.L. 117-103, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022, Division F of which is the Department of Homeland
Security Appropriations Act, 2022.
2 Although the Senate Appropriations Department of Homeland Security Subcommittee chairman introduced an
identical bill the same day, as the bill did not proceed through the markup process and therefore has no associated
report or detail table, the analysis in this report continues to refer to the draft and its explanatory statement.
3 When dealing with bill totals, the report refers to “adjusted annual net discretionary appropriations,” which take into
account the offsetting impact of rescissions or cancellations of budget authority provided in prior years. Neither of the
discretionary appropriations totals include emergency or disaster relief-designated funding.
4 This total evolved over the course of the process, owing in part to the changes in unobligated balances available for
rescission. Analyses in the report refer to the Congressional Budget Office’s (CBO’s) estimates as outlined in the detail
table at the end of H.Rept. 117-396.
Congressional Research Service

1

Comparing DHS Component Funding, FY2023: In Brief

$3.64 billion above the level requested by the Administration and $2.65 billion
above the FY2022 enacted level of annual appropriations.
 On July 28, 2022, Senate Appropriations Committee chairman Senator Patrick
Leahy released drafts of twelve appropriations measures that had yet to be
marked up by the committee, along with draft explanatory statements for each.5
 Chairman Leahy said,
“It is my hope that by releasing these bills, and making clear what the priorities
of Senate Democrats are, we can take a step closer toward reaching a bipartisan
compromise after months of stalled negotiations ... I look forward to continuing
to work with my dear friend, Vice Chairman Shelby, and I encourage good faith,
bipartisan negotiations on toplines to resume with the urgency that this moment
requires.”6
 Vice Chairman7Senator Richard Shelby criticized the move as partisan,
stating,
“Democrats must commit to a bipartisan framework that abandons poison pills,
preserves legacy riders, and demonstrates a serious commitment to our military.”8
 S. 4678, an identical bill to the committee draft, was introduced by Senate
Appropriations Committee Subcommittee on the Department of Homeland
Security Chairman Senator Christopher Murphy. The Senate Appropriations
majority draft bill for DHS for FY2023 included $59.89 billion in adjusted net
discretionary budget authority. This was $3.25 billion above the level requested
by the Administration, and $2.26 billion above the enacted annual level for
FY2022.
DHS Budgetary Resources: Beyond the Score
Discussion regarding annual appropriations often centers on the total level of appropriations
provided in the bill or how the bill scores against budget limitations. However, this “score” does
not represent the total budget authority provided to DHS, or controlled9 through appropriations
bills and reports.
 The use of offsetting collections reduces the “score” of the bill and provides
significant resources to some components of DHS, such as the Transportation
Security Administration.

5 The draft bills and explanatory statements can be found on the Senate Appropriations Committee website at
https://www.appropriations.senate.gov/news/majority/chairman-leahy-releases-remaining-nine-senate-appropriations-
bills.
6 U.S. Senate Committee on Appropriations, “Chairman Leahy Releases Fiscal Year 2023 Senate Appropriations
Bills,” press release, July 28, 2022, https://www.appropriations.senate.gov/news/majority/breaking-chairman-leahy-
releases-fiscal-year-2023-senate-appropriations-bills.
7 This is the title for the leader of the minority party on the Senate Appropriations Committee.
8 U.S. Senate Committee on Appropriations, “Shelby: Democrats’ Partisan Bills Threaten FY23 Appropriations
Process,” press release, July 28, 2022, https://www.appropriations.senate.gov/news/minority/shelby-democrats-
partisan-bills-threaten-fy23-appropriations-process.
9 Special tables at the end of appropriations conference reports and explanatory statements include a higher level of
detail on the funding provided to the department, usually at various program, project, and activity (PPA) levels. These
tables—known as detail tables—serve as a level of control for interpreting statutory authorities in the bill that regulate
the ability to transfer funding between appropriations or to reprogram money within an appropriation.
Congressional Research Service

2

link to page 7 link to page 7 link to page 7 Comparing DHS Component Funding, FY2023: In Brief

Discretionary scores of bills do not include mandatory spending, resources derived directly from
fee collections without annual congressional action, or emergency- or disaster relief-designated
appropriations. Figure 1 uses the data drawn from these detail tables to provide a more
comprehensive picture of the resources available to seven DHS operational components—the
seven largest components of DHS in terms of net discretionary budget authority:
 U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP),
 U.S. Coast Guard (USCG),
 Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE),
 Transportation Security Administration (TSA),
 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA),
 U.S. Secret Service (USSS), and
 Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA).
In Figure 1 these seven components are listed along the bottom axis. Each component’s funding
level as a section of the figure has five bars, representing the different phases of the
appropriations process: prior-year (i.e., FY2022) enacted, current year (i.e., FY2023) requested
annual appropriations, the ensuing responses of the House and Senate appropriations committees,
and the appropriations provided in enacted measures.10
The base (medium blue) segment of each bar represents net discretionary budget authority. On
top of these bases are several other segment types, representing offsetting collections (orange),
programs paid for directly by fees (gray), mandatory appropriations (yellow),11 funding covered
by disaster relief and emergency designations in annual appropriations (dark blue),12 and
supplemental appropriations (green).13
Figure 1 allows for a visual comparison of changes in individual component funding and
provides a more complete description of each component’s overall resource level than a review of
the net discretionary appropriations alone. Among the changes it illuminates are:
 The relative magnitude of disaster spending (which encompasses the mandatory,
disaster relief designated, and most of the supplemental funding for FEMA)
compared with other DHS funding priorities;
 The nominal increases provided by both House and Senate appropriators for all
DHS operational components above the requested level (although the relative
size of the increases vary), with H.R. 8257 including larger increases for the
USCG and TSA, while the Senate committee majority draft including a larger
increase for CBP;

10 While no new supplemental appropriations measures have been enacted for FY2023, this column shows advance
appropriations made in FY2022 that will be available in FY2023 where applicable.
11 In the past, the mandatory spending reflected here was composed of two elements: Coast Guard retired pay, which is
considered mandatory spending but requires congressional action nonetheless; and $250 million from the Aviation
Security Capital Fund (ASCF). However, in FY2023 both the House and Senate Appropriations Committees began to
track the ASCF as a fee-funded program, and out tables follow their methodology.
12 For more details about adjustments to discretionary spending limits under the BCA, see CRS Report R45778,
Exceptions to the Budget Control Act’s Discretionary Spending Limits, by Megan S. Lynch.
13 Supplemental appropriations in this case also include advance appropriations provided in P.L. 117-58, the
Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, Division J.
Congressional Research Service

3

link to page 8 link to page 7 link to page 8 link to page 8 Comparing DHS Component Funding, FY2023: In Brief

 The Administration’s proposal to provide additional offsetting fee revenue to
support TSA, and how appropriations measures needed to include additional
discretionary funding to maintain the proposed budget in the absence of
authorization to provide those additional revenues; and
 FY2023 supplemental and advance appropriations provided for FEMA in P.L.
117-58, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, Division J.14
Table 1, which follows immediately thereafter, provides a complete breakdown of the total
budget authority provided for FY2023 outlined in appropriations committee tables for all DHS
components, arranged by FY2022 enacted annual net discretionary budget authority.
Some DHS components have access to funding beyond the budget authority that is controlled for
reprogramming through the aforementioned detail tables in appropriations committee reports.
Although some of the mandatory spending for DHS, including many fee-funded programs, is
reflected in the tables, much of DHS’s mandatory spending is not, and is therefore not reflected in
Figure 1 or Table 1. This includes spending on flood insurance claims, as well as trust funds for
the Coast Guard and the Secret Service. Information on this type of mandatory spending can be
found in the Administration’s budget request.15
Likewise, the detail tables and the figures and tables based upon them in this report do not reflect
reimbursements between components for services provided, such as payments from partner
agencies to the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center for the cost of training programs.
Information on these resources can be found in the DHS annual budget justifications submitted to
Congress.16

14 $20 million in advance appropriations for CISA are available in FY2023 as well, but are not visible in the figure. See
Table 1.
15 The FY2023 DHS budget request can be found on the Office of Management and Budget website, or linked directly
at https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/dhs_fy2023.pdf.
16 The FY2023 DHS budget justification can be found at https://www.dhs.gov/publication/congressional-budget-
justification-fiscal-year-fy-2023.
Congressional Research Service

4

link to page 8

Figure 1. DHS Budget Authority by Selected Component, FY2022-FY2023

Source: See Table 1.
Notes: Data do not reflect the impact of rescissions or advance appropriations not available in a given fiscal year. CBP = U.S. Customs and Border Protection; USCG =
U.S. Coast Guard; ICE = U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement; TSA = Transportation Security Administration; FEMA = Federal Emergency Management Agency;
USSS = U.S. Secret Service; CISA = Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. Not all values are visible due to scale.
CRS-5

link to page 10 link to page 10 link to page 10 Comparing DHS Component Funding, FY2023: In Brief

Table 1. DHS Budget Authority by Component, FY2022-FY2023
(budget authority, controlled for reprogramming through appropriations committee reports, in thousands
of dollars)
FY2022
SAC
Enacted
HAC-
Majority
Component/ Funding
(Annual and
FY2023
Reported
Draft
FY2023
Aspect
Supplemental)
Request
H.R. 8257
(S. 4678)a
Enactedb
CBP
18,524,103
17,395,892
17,934,027
18,747,649
-
Net Discretionary
16,287,069
15,191,905
15,730,040
16,543,662
-
Funding
Offsetting Col ections
206,000
213,000
213,000
213,000
-
Fee-funded Programs
1,601,034
1,990,987
1,990,987
1,990,987
-
Supplemental
430,000
-
-
-
-
Appropriations
USCG
13,891,792
13,583,656
14,361,296
13,932,926
-
Net Discretionary
11,490,273
11,535,242
12,312,882
11,884,512
-
Funding
Offsetting Col ections
4,000
4,000
4,000
4,000
-
Mandatory
1,963,519
2,044,414
2,044,414
2,044,414
-
Appropriations
Supplemental
434,000
-
-
-
-
Appropriations
ICE
8,877,494
8,479,500
8,775,939
8,518,652
-
Net Discretionary
8,497,884
8,099,890
8,396,329
8,139,042
-
Funding
Fee-funded Programs
379,610
379,610
379,610
379,610
-
TSA
8,743,461
10,301,602
10,026,084
9,548,452
-
Net Discretionary
6,177,461
5,685,602
6,930,084
6,339,952
-
Funding
Offsetting Col ections
2,310,000
4,360,000
2,840,000
2,952,500
-
Fee-funded Programsc
256,000
256,000
256,000
256,000
-
FEMA
26,339,379
25,097,670
25,873,440
25,801,881 1,400,000
Net Discretionary
5,242,043
5,099,040
5,669,810
5,598,251
-
Funding
Offsetting Col ections
248,336
258,630
258,630
258,630
-
Disaster Relief
18,799,000
19,740,000
19,945,000
19,945,000
-
Designated
Supplemental
2,050,000
-
-
- 1,400,000
Appropriations
USSS
2,611,888
2,703,509
2,727,509
2,733,923
-
Net Discretionary
2,611,888
2,703,509
2,727,509
2,733,923
-
Funding
Congressional Research Service

6

link to page 10 link to page 10 link to page 10 Comparing DHS Component Funding, FY2023: In Brief

FY2022
SAC
Enacted
HAC-
Majority
Component/ Funding
(Annual and
FY2023
Reported
Draft
FY2023
Aspect
Supplemental)
Request
H.R. 8257
(S. 4678)a
Enactedb
CISA
2,648,656
2,483,592
2,900,692
2,884,750
20,000
Net Discretionary
2,593,656
2,483,592
2,900,692
2,884,750
-
Funding
Supplemental
55,000
-
-
-
20,000
Appropriations
MD
3,962,209
4,439,282
4,497,857
4,422,124
-
Net Discretionary
2,259,325
2,325,803
2,384,378
2,308,645
-
Funding
Offsetting Col ections
1,653,384
2,113,479
2,113,479
2,113,479
-
Emergency Annual
49,500
-
-
-
-
Appropriations
S&T
1043,903
901,291
963,777
941,856
-
Net Discretionary
886,403
901,291
963,777
941,856
-
Funding
Supplemental
157,500
-
-
-
-
Appropriations
CWMD
452,011
428,972
428,972
430,972
-
Net Discretionary
452,011
428,972
428,972
430,972
-
Funding
USCIS
5,424,641
5,991,606
5,773,277
5,962,689
-
Net Discretionary
409,504
913,622
695,293
884,705
-
Funding
Fee-funded Programs
4,822,137
5,077,984
5,077,984
5,077,984
-
Supplemental
193,000
-
-
-
-
Appropriations
FLETC
355,636
396,547
396,547
396,547
-
Net Discretionary
355,636
396,547
396,547
396,547
-
Funding
A&Od
298,171
341,159
341,159
341,159
-
Net Discretionary
298,171
341,159
341,159
341,159
-
Funding
OSEM
418,509
316,180
394,765
326,045
-
Net Discretionary
271,053
316,180
394,765
326,045
-
Funding
Supplemental
147,456
-
-
-
-
Appropriations
OIG
205,359
214,879
218,379
214,879
-
Net Discretionary
205,359
214,879
218,379
214,879
-
Funding
Congressional Research Service

7

link to page 10 link to page 10 link to page 11 link to page 12 link to page 11 link to page 12 Comparing DHS Component Funding, FY2023: In Brief

FY2022
SAC
Enacted
HAC-
Majority
Component/ Funding
(Annual and
FY2023
Reported
Draft
FY2023
Aspect
Supplemental)
Request
H.R. 8257
(S. 4678)a
Enactedb
TOTAL NET
84,774,912
83,326,342
85,864,725
85,455,509 1,420,000
DISCRETIONARY B.A.
+ DISASTER RELIEF
AND EMERGENCY
FUNDING, DHS
Sources: CRS analysis of P.L. 117-103, Division F, and its explanatory statement; P.L. 117-58; H.R. 8257 and
H.Rept. 117-396; and the Senate Appropriations Committee majority-produced draft appropriations bil and
explanatory statement released on July 28, 2022, available at https://www.appropriations.senate.gov/news/
majority/breaking-chairman-leahy-releases-fiscal-year-2023-senate-appropriations-bil s.
Notes: Data do not reflect the impact of rescissions or advance appropriations not available in a given fiscal
year. HAC = House Appropriations Committee; SAC = Senate Appropriations Committee; CBP = U.S. Customs
and Border Protection; USCG = U.S. Coast Guard; ICE = U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement; TSA =
Transportation Security Administration; FEMA = Federal Emergency Management Agency; USSS = U.S. Secret
Service; CISA = Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency; MD = Management Directorate; S&T =
Science and Technology Directorate; CWMD = Office of Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction; FLETC =
Federal Law Enforcement Training Center; A&O = Analysis and Operations; OSEM = Office of the Secretary and
Executive Management; OIG = Office of the Inspector General; USCIS = U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Services.
a. This bil is identical to the committee majority draft as released, as is provided for simplified reference.
b. This represents only appropriations provided thus far for FY2023 for DHS (advance appropriations included
in P.L. 117-58, Division J).
c. The Aviation Security Capital Fund, which had been recorded as mandatory spending, is now included as
part of fee-funded programs, for congruence with the committee reports.
d. “Analysis and Operations” is the name provided in the budget justification. This component is referred to
in the House-reported bil as Intel igence, Analysis and Situational Awareness, and in the Senate draft as
Intelligence, Analysis, and Operational Coordination.
DHS Appropriations: Comparing Scores
It is often useful to present comparative analysis to put enacted annual funding levels for given
DHS components in context. Table 2 and Table 3 show congressional action (by the House
Appropriations Committee and the Senate Appropriations Committee majority, respectively) on
net discretionary annual FY2023 appropriations for DHS distributed by departmental component
in comparison to two common baselines described below.
Each table presents an analysis of a component’s net discretionary annual appropriations—
appropriations provided from the Treasury that are not offset by other incoming resources or
given special exemption.17 Comparison is drawn between two common baselines that are also
shown in Table 1—the FY2022 enacted funding level and the FY2023 requested funding level. In
Table 2 and Table 3, the first column of figures shows the position reflected in either the House-
reported bill or the Senate majority committee draft. Changes from that level are reflected in
thousands of dollars, and then as a percentage. The components are ordered from largest to
smallest by FY2022 enacted funding level.

17 The two most common types of exemption in the DHS appropriations context are the emergency designation and the
disaster relief designation. These designations exempt such funding from being counted against discretionary budget
limits.
Congressional Research Service

8

link to page 11 link to page 12 link to page 7 link to page 8 link to page 11 Comparing DHS Component Funding, FY2023: In Brief

FY2022 and FY2023 supplemental and advance appropriations are not reflected in Table 2 or
Table 3. The purpose of these tables is to provide comparative perspectives on annual
appropriations levels, as well as to improve understanding of comparative annual appropriations
levels across the department, rather than to survey total resources provided by Congress, which
can be seen in Figure 1 and Table 1. However, as advance appropriations were a known element
in the formulation of the proposals, they are included in the table notes.
Table 2. House Appropriations Committee-reported DHS Annual Discretionary
Appropriations, FY2023, Compared
(net discretionary budget authority, in thousands of dollars)
House
Compared to FY2023 Annual
Compared to FY2022 Annual

Appropriations
Request
Enacted
Committee-
reported
Component
H.R. 8257
$
%
$
%
CBP
15,730,040
538,135
3.5%
(557,029)
(3.4%)
USCG
12,312,882
777,640
6.7%
822,609
7.2%
ICE
8,396,329
296,439
3.7%
(101,555)
(1.2%)
TSA
6,930,084
1,244,482
21.9%
752,623
12.2%
FEMA
5,669,810
570,770
11.2%
427,767
8.2%
USSS
2,727,509
24,000
0.9%
115,621
4.4%
CISA
2,900,692
417,100
16.8%
307,036
11.8%
MD
2,384,378
58,575
2.5%
125,053
5.5%
S&T
963,777
62,486
6.9%
77,374
8.7%
CWMD
428,972
-
0.0%
(23,039)
(5.1%)
USCIS
695,293
(218,329)
(23.9%)
285,789
69.8%
FLETC
396,547
-
0.0%
40,911
11.5%
A&Oa
341,159
-
0.0%
42,988
14.4%
OSEM
394,765
78,585
24.9%
123,712
45.6%
OIG
218,379
3,500
1.6%
13,020
6.3%
Source: CRS analysis of P.L. 117-103, Division F, and its explanatory statement; and H.R. 8257 and H.Rept. 117-
396.
Notes: Negative numbers are shown in (parentheses). “-” = a zero value, indicating no difference. Data do not
reflect the impact of transfers, rescissions, emergency- or disaster relief-designated funding, or advance
appropriations not available in the given fiscal year. CBP = U.S. Customs and Border Protection; USCG = U.S.
Coast Guard; ICE = U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement; TSA = Transportation Security Administration;
FEMA = Federal Emergency Management Agency; USSS = U.S. Secret Service; CISA = Cybersecurity and
Infrastructure Security Agency; MD = Management Directorate; S&T = Science and Technology Directorate;
CWMD = Office of Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction; FLETC = Federal Law Enforcement Training
Center; A&O = Analysis and Operations; OSEM = Office of the Secretary and Executive Management; OIG =
Office of the Inspector General; USCIS = U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
a. “Analysis and Operations” is the name provided for this component in the DHS budget justification. The
component is referred to in the House-reported bil as Intelligence, Analysis and Situational Awareness, and
in the Senate draft as Intelligence, Analysis, and Operational Coordination.

Congressional Research Service

9

link to page 12 link to page 12 Comparing DHS Component Funding, FY2023: In Brief

Table 3. Senate Appropriations Committee Majority Draft DHS Annual
Discretionary Appropriations, FY2023, Compared
(net discretionary budget authority, in thousands of dollars)
Senate
Compared to FY2023 Annual
Compared to FY2022 Annual

Appropriations
Request
Enacted
Committee
Majority Draft
Component (S. 4678)a
$
%
$
%
CBP
16,543,662
1,351,757
8.9%
256,593
1.6%
USCG
11,884,512
349,270
3.0%
394,239
3.4%
ICE
8,139,042
39,152
0.5%
(358,842)
(4.2%)
TSA
6,339,952
654,350
11.5%
162,491
2.6%
FEMA
5,598,251
499,211
9.8%
356,208
6.8%
USSS
2,733,923
30,414
1.1%
122,035
4.7%
CISA
2,884,750
401,158
16.2%
291,094
11.2%
MD
2,308,645
(17,158)
(0.7%)
49,320
2.2%
S&T
941,856
40,565
4.5%
55,453
6.3%
CWMD
430,972
2,000
0.5%
(21,039)
(4.7%)
USCIS
884,705
(28,917)
(3.2%)
475,201
116.0%
FLETC
396,547
-
0.0%
40,911
11.5%
A&Ob
341,159
-
0.0%
42,988
14.4%
OSEM
326,045
9,865
3.1%
54,992
20.3%
OIG
214,879
-
0.0%
9,520
4.6%
Source: CRS analysis of P.L. 117-103, Division F, and its explanatory statement; and the Senate Appropriations
Committee majority-produced draft appropriations bil and explanatory statement released on July 28, 2022.
Notes: Negative numbers are shown in (parentheses). “-” = a zero value, indicating no difference. Data do not
reflect the impact of transfers, rescissions, emergency- or disaster relief-designated funding, or advance
appropriations not available in the given fiscal year. CBP = U.S. Customs and Border Protection; USCG = U.S.
Coast Guard; ICE = U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement; TSA = Transportation Security Administration;
FEMA = Federal Emergency Management Agency; USSS = U.S. Secret Service; CISA = Cybersecurity and
Infrastructure Security Agency; MD = Management Directorate; S&T = Science and Technology Directorate;
CWMD = Office of Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction; FLETC = Federal Law Enforcement Training
Center; A&O = Analysis and Operations; OSEM = Office of the Secretary and Executive Management; OIG =
Office of the Inspector General; USCIS = U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
a. This bil is identical to the committee majority draft as released, as is provided for simplified reference.
b. “Analysis and Operations” is the name provided for this component in the DHS budget justification. The
component is referred to in the House-reported bil as Intelligence, Analysis and Situational Awareness, and
in the Senate draft as Intelligence, Analysis, and Operational Coordination.

Congressional Research Service

10

Comparing DHS Component Funding, FY2023: In Brief

Author Information

William L. Painter

Specialist in Homeland Security and Appropriations

Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan
shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and
under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other
than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in
connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not
subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in
its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or
material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to
copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.

Congressional Research Service
R47220 · VERSION 1 · NEW
11