link to page 1  link to page 2 

 
 
Updated June 24, 2022
Army Corps of Engineers: FY2022 Appropriations
Congress generally funds the civil works activities of the 
Figure 1.USACE Annual Appropriations by Account, 
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) in annual Energy 
FY2018-FY2022 
and Water Development appropriations acts. These 
(nominal $, in bil ions) 
activities include the planning and construction of 
authorized water resource projects and the operation and 
maintenance of infrastructure and navigation improvements 
managed by USACE. For USACE civil works, President 
Biden requested $6.79 billion for FY2022, which was $547 
million above FY2021 enacted. Since FY2013, Congress 
has funded USACE above the President’s request. For 
FY2022, Congress provided $8.34 billion (19% above the 
FY2022 request and 7% above FY2021 enacted level) in 
the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022 (Division D, 
Title I of P.L. 117-103). In 2021, Congress also provided 
USACE with $22.81 billion in supplemental appropriations 
in P.L. 117-43 and P.L. 117-58 (see CRS In Focus IF11945, 
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: Supplemental 
Appropriations). Of these supplemental funds, $20.68 
billion were made available in FY2022. 
USACE Funding 
 
Unlike many of the federal agencies that support 
Source: CRS, based on enacted appropriations laws. 
infrastructure investments by distributing funds to 
Notes: ASA = Assistant Secretary of the Army; FUSRAP = Formerly 
nonfederal entities by formula or through competitive grant 
Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program; Regulatory = Regulatory 
programs, USACE commits funds directly for project 
Program; WIFIA = Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act. 
planning and construction. It uses most of its appropriations 
for work on specific studies and projects authorized by 
Congressionally Directed Funding 
Congress. The costs for these activities are often shared 
The 117th Congress included congressionally directed 
with nonfederal project sponsors or users. For more on the 
funding for site-specific studies and projects in the FY2022 
USACE appropriations process and related issues, see CRS 
appropriations process. From the 112th to the 116th 
Report R46320, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: Annual 
Congresses, moratorium policies limited congressionally 
Appropriations Process and Issues for Congress.  
directed funding of these studies and projects, which are 
sometimes referred to as earmarks. For FY2022, in addition 
As did budget requests by previous Administrations, a 
to providing funds for the President’s requested studies and 
majority of President Biden’s FY2022 USACE budget 
projects, Congress in the joint explanatory statement (1) 
request would have funded existing infrastructure through 
funded geographically specific studies and projects that 
the operations and maintenance (O&M) account. Congress 
were requested by Members of Congress (i.e., community 
provided 55% of FY2022 USACE appropriations through 
project funding/congressionally directed spending, 
the O&M account, which included an increase of $720 
CPF/CDS) and (2) provided funds in broad categories 
million in FY2022 compared with FY2021. Congress 
(referred to as additional funding), such as shore protection, 
provided less funding for four accounts in the enacted 
and directed USACE to develop a work plan for 
FY2022 annual appropriations compared with FY2021 
distributing funds to individual studies and projects (as had 
(e.g., $200 million less for the Construction account; see 
been the case in the 112th-116th Congresses). Congress did 
Figure 1). Pursuant to direction in the joint explanatory 
not provide the Administration with authority to initiate 
statement that accompanied P.L. 117-103 enactment, 
additional new starts beyond those listed in the explanatory 
Congress funded a “limited number” of new studies and 
statement with FY2022 work plan appropriations. 
projects (referred to as new starts); these included the 
Additional funding in FY2022 totaled $782 million, down 
Administration’s request for seven new studies and four 
from $2.25 billion in FY2021 (Figure 2). CPF/CDS, which 
new construction projects. 
were not part of FY2021 appropriations, totaled $584 
million in FY2022. While most CPF/CDS requests by 
Members were included in FY2022 enacted appropriations, 
some CPF/CDS items included in the FY2022 House and 
Senate bills were funded at a lower level than requested or 
not included in the enacted bill.   
https://crsreports.congress.gov 

Army Corps of Engineers: FY2022 Appropriations 
Figure 2.USACE Funding for Individual Studies and 
$2.05 billion from the HMTF in FY2022, which is above 
Projects, FY2018-FY2022 
the HMTF revenue projection of $1.97 billion.  
(nominal $, in bil ions) 
Flood Risk and Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration  
The FY2022 request for inland and coastal flood risk 
reduction was $1.72 billion, of which $1.68 billion was for 
inland projects and $37 million for coastal projects. The 
request included $359 million for Everglades restoration 
among the $498 million requested for aquatic ecosystem 
restoration activities. Congress through P.L. 117-103 
provided additional funding to support these types of 
projects and funded specific flood and restoration projects 
based on CPF/CDS requests. In total, the FY2022 enacted 
annual appropriations supported inland flood risk reduction 
at $1.78 billion and coastal flood risk reduction at $170 
million. FY2022 enacted appropriations provided $702 
million for aquatic ecosystem restoration, including $359 
million for Everglades restoration.   
Continuing Authorities Programs 
 
USACE plans and constructs projects of limited scope and 
Source: CRS, using enacted appropriations laws and reports. 
cost, without project-specific authorizations, through its 
Notes: CPF/CDS = community project funding/congressional y 
Continuing Authorities Programs (CAPs; see CRS In Focus 
directed spending. Continuing Authorities Programs are not included.  
IF11106, Army Corps of Engineers: Continuing Authorities 
Programs). While President Biden’s FY2022 request 
Navigation Improvements 
included $5 million for four of nine authorized CAPs, 
The FY2022 budget requested $3.44 billion for navigation, 
Congress funded $53 million for eight CAPs for FY2022 in 
including $2.26 billion for coastal navigation and harbors 
P.L. 117-103. Some of the CAP funding was directed 
and $1.19 billion for inland and intracoastal waterways. The 
toward specific projects as CPF/CDS under five CAPs.  
enacted annual appropriations funded navigation at $2.84 
billion for coastal navigation and harbors and $1.29 billion 
Environmental Infrastructure Assistance 
for inland and intracoastal wateways. Some navigation 
Since 1992, Congress also has authorized and funded 
activities are funded by trust funds―the Inland Waterways 
USACE to provide environmental infrastructure (EI) 
Trust Fund (IWTF) and the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund 
assistance (e.g., planning, design, and construction of 
(HMTF). The request proposed to create separate accounts 
municipal drinking water and wastewater infrastructure 
for the funds, but Congress did not adopt the proposal.  
projects in specified communities, counties, and states). 
(See CRS Report R47162, Army Corps of Engineers 
The IWTF receives collections from a $0.29 per gallon fuel 
(USACE) Environmental Infrastructure (EI) Assistance: 
tax on commercial vessels on designated waterways.  The 
Authorities, Appropriations, and Issues for Congress.) For 
Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (Division AA 
FY2022, the Administration did not request funding for EI 
of P.L. 116-260) amended the required IWTF contribution 
assistance; however, Congress funded $87 million for 
toward some USACE construction projects on inland and 
specific EI assistance authorities as CPF/CDS, plus $13 
intracoastal waterways. As a result, the IWTF contributes 
million that USACE allocated in its F2022 work plan.  
35%, rather than 50%, to the construction of projects 
receiving construction appropriations in FY2021 through 
Civil Works Infrastructure Financing Program  
FY2031 (or until the projects are complete). Based on the 
In 2014, the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation 
work plan, the IWTF is providing $72.4 million toward 
Act (WIFIA; 33 U.S.C. §§3901-3914, as amended) 
navigation infrastructure in FY2022.  
authorized USACE to provide credit assistance, in the form 
of secured or direct loans, for a range of water resource 
The HMTF receives Harbor Maintenance Tax (HMT) 
projects. In FY2021, Congress created a new USACE 
collections. The HMT is applied principally to imported 
WIFIA account and funded the program at $14.2 million. 
and domestic waterborne cargo at coastal and Great Lakes 
Congress provided an additional $75.0 million for the 
ports. Congress has authorized using HMTF monies for 
USACE WIFIA account in P.L. 117-58 and $7.2 million for 
certain coastal navigation and harbor O&M activities. In 
FY2022. The funds provided to date are to cover the 
most years since the early 1990s, annual HMT collections 
subsidy and administrative costs for financial assistance for 
and interest on the HMTF balance exceeded annual 
nonfederal dam safety projects. (See CRS Insight IN11577, 
spending on HMTF-eligible activities. Due to provisions 
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Civil Works Infrastructure 
enacted in Section 14003 of P.L. 116-136 and Section 101 
Financing Program (CWIFP): Status and Issues).  
of P.L. 116-260, the use of some HMTF funds no longer 
counts toward annual budget caps (see CRS In Focus 
Anna E. Normand, Analyst in Natural Resources Policy   
IF11700, Water Resources Development Act of 2020). In 
Nicole T. Carter, Specialist in Natural Resources Policy   
P.L. 117-103, Congress provided USACE with almost 
IF11846
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
Army Corps of Engineers: FY2022 Appropriations 
 
 
Disclaimer 
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to 
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. 
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has 
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the 
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be 
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include 
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you 
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 
 
https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF11846 · VERSION 4 · UPDATED