FY2020 State Grants Under Title I-A of the
April 22, 2022
Elementary and Secondary Education Act
Rebecca R. Skinner
(ESEA)
Specialist in Education
Policy
The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), most recently comprehensively amended

by the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA; P.L. 114-95), is the primary source of federal aid to
Isobel Sorenson
support elementary and secondary education. The Title I-A program is the largest grant program
Research Assistant
authorized under the ESEA and was funded at $16.3 billion for FY2020. It is designed to provide

supplementary educational and related services to low-achieving and other students attending
elementary and secondary schools with relatively high concentrations of students from low-

income families.
Under current law, the U.S. Department of Education (ED) determines Title I-A grants to local educational agencies (LEAs)
based on four separate funding formulas: Basic Grants, Concentration Grants, Targeted Grants, and Education Finance
Incentive Grants (EFIG). State grants are the total of the allocations for all LEAs in the state under all four formulas. The four
Title I-A formulas have somewhat distinct allocation patterns, providing varying shares of allocated funds to different types
of LEAs and states. Thus, for some states, certain formulas are more favorable than others.
This report provides FY2020 state grant amounts under each of the four formulas used to determine Title I-A grants. Overall,
California received the largest FY2020 Title I-A grant amount ($2.0 billion, or 12.39% of total Title I-A grants). Vermont
received the smallest FY2020 Title I-A grant amount ($37.7 million, or 0.23% of total Title I-A grants).
Congressional Research Service

FY2020 State Grants Under ESEA Title I-A

Introduction
The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), most recently comprehensively amended
by the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA; P.L. 114-95), is the primary source of federal aid to
support elementary and secondary education. Title I-A1 is the largest program in the ESEA,
funded at $16.3 billion for FY2020. Title I-A is designed to provide supplementary educational
and related services to low-achieving and other students attending elementary and secondary
schools with relatively high concentrations of students from low-income families. The U.S.
Department of Education (ED) determines Title I-A grants to local educational agencies (LEAs)
based on four separate funding formulas: Basic Grants, Concentration Grants, Targeted Grants,
and Education Finance Incentive Grants (EFIG). Grants to states2 are the total of the allocations
for all LEAs in the state under all four formulas.
This report provides FY2020 state grant amounts under each of the four formulas used to
determine Title I-A grants.3 For a general overview of the Title I-A formulas, see CRS Report
R44164, ESEA Title I-A Formulas: In Brief. For a more detailed discussion of the Title I-A
formulas, see CRS Report R44461, Allocation of Funds Under Title I-A of the Elementary and
Secondary Education Act.
Methodology for Determining Title I-A Grants
Under Title I-A, funds are allocated to LEAs via state educational agencies (SEAs) using the four
Title I-A formulas. Annual appropriations acts specify portions of each year’s Title I-A
appropriation to be allocated under each of the formulas. In FY2020, about 40% of Title I-A
appropriations were allocated through the Basic Grants formula, 8% through the Concentration
Grants formula, 26% through the Targeted Grants, and 26% through the EFIG formulas. After
reserving funds for the U.S. Census Bureau, the Bureau of Indian Education, and the outlying
areas, $16.1 billion was available for FY2020 Title I-A grants to LEAs.4 Once funds reach LEAs,
the amounts allocated under the four formulas are combined and used jointly.
For each formula, a maximum grant is calculated by multiplying a formula child count by an
expenditure factor based on state average per pupil expenditures for public elementary and
secondary education.5 Formula child counts consist of children who are ages 5-17 (1) living in

1 Title I-A is officially titled Improving Basic Programs Operated by Local Educational Agencies in the ESEA, but it is
commonly referred to as Title I-A.
2 For the purposes of Title I-A, the term states includes the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico.
3 This report is one in a series of annual reports on Title I-A state grants. For more information about FY2019 Title I-A
grants to states, see CRS Report R46269, FY2019 State Grants Under Title I-A of the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act (ESEA). For more information about FY2018 Title I-A grants to states, see CRS Report R45662,
FY2018 State Grants Under Title I-A of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA). For more information
about FY2017 Title I-A grants to states, see CRS Report R44873, FY2017 State Grants Under Title I-A of the
Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA). For more information about FY2016 Title I-A grants to states, see
CRS Report R44486, FY2016 State Grants Under Title I-A of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
For more information about FY2015 Title I-A grants to states, see CRS Report R44097, FY2015 State Grants Under
Title I-A of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
4 From the total Title I-A FY2020 appropriation, $5 million was reserved for the U.S. Census Bureau. From the
remaining funds, 1.1% was reserved for the Bureau of Indian Education and the outlying areas. For the purposes of
Title I-A, the outlying areas include American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, and
the U.S. Virgin Islands.
5 For a detailed discussion of the Title I-A formulas, see CRS Report R44461, Allocation of Funds Under Title I-A of
the Elementary and Secondary Education Act
Congressional Research Service
1

FY2020 State Grants Under ESEA Title I-A

families in poverty, according to estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau’s Small Area Income
and Poverty Estimates (SAIPE) program; (2) in institutions for neglected or delinquent children
or in foster homes; and (3) in families receiving Temporary Assistance for Needy Families
(TANF) payments, but with incomes above the federal poverty income level for a family of four.
In some of the Title I-A formulas, additional factors are multiplied by the formula child count and
expenditure factor to determine a maximum grant amount. These maximum grants are then
reduced to equal the level of available appropriations for each formula, taking into account a
variety of state and LEA minimum grant provisions. In general, LEAs must have a minimum
number of formula children and/or a minimum formula child rate to be eligible to receive a grant
under a specific Title I-A formula. Some LEAs may qualify for a grant under only one formula,
while other LEAs may be eligible to receive grants under multiple formulas.
Under three of the formulas—Basic Grants, Concentration Grants, and Targeted Grants—grants
are initially calculated at the LEA level. State grants are the total of the allocations for all LEAs in
the state, adjusted for state minimum grant provisions. Under EFIG, grants are first calculated for
each state, including adjustments for state minimum grant provisions. EFIG grants are
subsequently suballocated to LEAs within the state.
After calculating LEA grant amounts, ED provides these amounts to each state. States need to
make adjustments to these LEA grant amounts to account for LEAs for which ED is unable to
estimate Title I-A grant amounts, such as charter schools that operate as independent LEAs or
newly formed LEAs. In addition, each state must reserve Title I-A funds for school improvement
and may also reserve Title I-A funds for administration and direct student services. Thus, the LEA
grant amounts calculated by ED may be higher than what an LEA will actually receive after state
adjustments and reservations are made.
FY2020 Title I-A Grants
In general, grant amounts for states vary across the Title I-A formulas due to the different
allocation amounts for the formulas provided through the appropriations process and the
characteristics of the formulas themselves. For example, with respect to appropriations for each
of the formulas, the Basic Grant formula receives a greater share of overall Title I-A
appropriations than the Concentration Grant formula, so states generally receive higher grant
amounts and a greater share of their total Title I-A funds under the Basic Grant formula than
under the Concentration Grant formula. With respect to formula characteristics,6 the amount of
funding received under each formula is related, in part, to an LEA’s, and by extension a state’s,
number or percentage of formula children. For example, Texas has a larger population of children
included in the formula calculations than North Carolina and, therefore, received a higher grant
amount and larger share of Title I-A funds than did North Carolina in FY2020.
It is also possible for states to have similar numbers of formula children but have different
expenditure factors, contributing to a lower Title I-A grant amount for the state with the lower
expenditure factor. For example, Washington and Mississippi have similar numbers of formula
children, but Washington has a higher expenditure factor. This difference contributes to
Washington receiving a Title I-A grant that is almost $35 million higher than the grant amount
provided to Mississippi.

6 For more information about the characteristics of the Title I-A formulas and how they affect grant amounts, see CRS
Report R45141, Analysis of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act Title I-A Allocation Formulas: Factors,
Design Elements, and Allocation Patterns.
Congressional Research Service
2

link to page 7 link to page 11 link to page 11 link to page 11 FY2020 State Grants Under ESEA Title I-A

Figure 1, below, details the composition of each state’s Title I-A grant based on the share of total
state funds received under each of the formulas. The figure also provides the amount of funding
each state received under each of the formulas.
State grant amounts can also be examined based on each state’s share of the amount of funds
available overall and under each of the formulas relative to other states. Table 1 provides each
state’s grant amount and percentage share of funds allocated under each of the Title I-A formulas
for FY2020. The latter was determined for each state by dividing the state’s grant amount under
that formula by the total amount of funding allocated for a given Title I-A formula. Total Title I-A
grants, calculated by summing the state level grant for each of the four formulas, also are shown
in Table 1, along with state percentage shares of total Title I-A grants.
Overall, California received the largest total Title I-A grant amount ($2.0 billion) and, as a result,
the largest percentage share (12.39%) of Title I-A grants. Vermont received the smallest total Title
I-A grant amount ($37.7 million) and, as a result, the smallest percentage share (0.23%) of Title I-
A grants.
Within a state, the percentage share of funds allocated may vary by formula, as certain formulas
are more favorable to certain types of states. For example, in addition to the formula features
discussed above, EFIG is generally more favorable to states with comparatively equal levels of
spending per pupil among their LEAs. If a state’s share of a given Title I-A formula exceeds its
share of overall Title I-A funds, this is generally an indication that this particular formula is more
favorable to the state than formulas for which the state’s share of funds is below its overall share
of Title I-A funds. For example, Florida received a higher percentage share of Concentration
Grants and Targeted Grants than overall Title I-A funds, indicating that the Concentration Grant
and Targeted Grant formulas are more favorable to Florida than the Basic Grant or EFIG formulas
may be. Utah, on the other hand, received a higher percentage share of Basic Grants and EFIG
than overall Title I-A funds, indicating that the Basic Grant and EFIG formulas are more
favorable to Utah than the Concentration Grant or Targeted Grant formulas may be.
Another factor affecting state grant amounts is the state minimum grant provision included in
each of the four Title I-A formulas. The Targeted Grant and EFIG formulas require that states
receiving only a minimum grant amount under these formulas receive a higher percentage of
available funds than they are required to receive under the Basic Grant or Concentration Grant
formulas. This is evident in the shares of each formula provided to the states that received only a
minimum grant under all four formulas (Alaska, Montana, New Hampshire, North Dakota, South
Dakota, Vermont, and Wyoming). Each of these states received a higher share of the total
available funds under the Targeted Grant and EFIG formulas than under the Basic Grant or
Concentration Grant formulas. As a state may receive only a state minimum grant amount under
any or all of the formulas, Table 1 indicates which states received only a minimum grant under
each of the Title I-A formulas.

Congressional Research Service
3

Figure 1. FY2020 Title I-A State Grants by Amount and Share of Funds Provided Under Each Formula
(dollars in thousands)

CRS-4

CRS-5

CRS-6

Source: Figure prepared by CRS based on unpublished data provided by the U.S. Department of Education (ED), Budget Service. FY2020 Title I-A grant amounts were
calculated by ED using the most current data available. Percentage shares of state grant FY2020 allocation amounts from each formula were calculated by CRS.
Notes: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. Percentages were calculated based on unrounded numbers. Amounts shown in the figure only reflect Title I-A
funds provided to states. These amounts are determined after funds have been reserved from the total Title I-A appropriation ($16.3 bil ion) for the Census Bureau,
Bureau of Indian Education, and outlying areas. For the purposes of Title I-A, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico are considered states.

CRS-7

link to page 13 link to page 13 link to page 13 link to page 13 link to page 13 link to page 13 link to page 13 link to page 13 link to page 13 link to page 13
Table 1. FY2020 Title I-A State Grants and Percentage Share of Funds Received Under Each Title I-A Formula Relative to All
States
(dollars in thousands)

Basic Grants
Concentration Grants
Targeted Grants
EFIG
Total Title I-A Grants
Percentage
Percentage
Percentage
Percentage
Percentage
Share of
Share of
Share of
Share of
Share of
Grant
Total
Grant
Total
Grant
Total
Grant
Total
Grant
Total
State
Amount
Allocation
Amount
Allocation
Amount
Allocation
Amount
Allocation
Amount
Allocation
Total, All States
$6,383,403
100.00% $1,347,316
100.00%
$4,197,365
100.00% $4,197,365
100.00% $16,125,449
100.00%
Alabama
$104,441
1.64%
$24,360
1.81%
$66,645
1.59%
$71,182
1.70%
$266,628
1.65%
Alaska
$17,744a
0.28%
$2,447a
0.18%
$13,655a
0.33%
$13,576a
0.32%
$47,422
0.29%
Arizona
$136,856
2.14%
$29,480
2.19%
$90,376
2.15%
$89,092
2.12%
$345,804
2.14%
Arkansas
$66,267
1.04%
$15,167
1.13%
$38,237
0.91%
$47,200
1.12%
$166,871
1.03%
California
$798,419
12.51%
$169,875
12.61%
$542,574
12.93%
$486,457
11.59%
$1,997,325
12.39%
Colorado
$63,483
0.99%
$11,468
0.85%
$37,231
0.89%
$41,508
0.99%
$153,690
0.95%
Connecticut
$62,121
0.97%
$10,721
0.80%
$30,821
0.73%
$40,867
0.97%
$144,530
0.90%
Delaware
$20,701
0.32%
$4,448
0.33%
$14,691a
0.35%
$14,691a
0.35%
$54,530
0.34%
District of Columbia
$17,744a
0.28%
$4,229
0.31%
$14,442
0.34%
$14,054a
0.33%
$50,469
0.31%
Florida
$331,639
5.20%
$80,611
5.98%
$277,300
6.61%
$231,400
5.51%
$920,950
5.71%
Georgia
$217,189
3.40%
$50,386
3.74%
$148,387
3.54%
$141,854
3.38%
$557,817
3.46%
Hawaii
$20,083
0.31%
$4,537
0.34%
$14,691a
0.35%
$14,874
0.35%
$54,184
0.34%
Idaho
$24,602
0.39%
$4,264
0.32%
$14,691a
0.35%
$15,350
0.37%
$58,907
0.37%
Il inois
$276,606
4.33%
$55,144
4.09%
$176,289
4.20%
$160,172
3.82%
$668,211
4.14%
Indiana
$108,878
1.71%
$22,048
1.64%
$59,600
1.42%
$73,173
1.74%
$263,699
1.64%
Iowa
$44,374
0.70%
$7,177
0.53%
$20,274
0.48%
$30,619
0.73%
$102,445
0.64%
Kansas
$46,649
0.73%
$8,597
0.64%
$24,219
0.58%
$29,816
0.71%
$109,281
0.68%
Kentucky
$106,302
1.67%
$24,856
1.84%
$67,092
1.60%
$73,957
1.76%
$272,208
1.69%
CRS-8

link to page 13 link to page 13 link to page 13 link to page 13 link to page 13 link to page 13 link to page 13 link to page 13 link to page 13 link to page 13 link to page 13 link to page 13 link to page 13 link to page 13

Basic Grants
Concentration Grants
Targeted Grants
EFIG
Total Title I-A Grants
Percentage
Percentage
Percentage
Percentage
Percentage
Share of
Share of
Share of
Share of
Share of
Grant
Total
Grant
Total
Grant
Total
Grant
Total
Grant
Total
State
Amount
Allocation
Amount
Allocation
Amount
Allocation
Amount
Allocation
Amount
Allocation
Louisiana
$132,101
2.07%
$32,017
2.38%
$91,689
2.18%
$88,896
2.12%
$344,704
2.14%
Maine
$21,781
0.34%
$4,156
0.31%
$14,691a
0.35%
$14,691a
0.35%
$55,318
0.34%
Maryland
$96,543
1.51%
$19,638
1.46%
$70,387
1.68%
$67,420
1.61%
$253,988
1.58%
Massachusetts
$104,772
1.64%
$18,113
1.34%
$54,586
1.30%
$65,520
1.56%
$242,991
1.51%
Michigan
$197,557
3.09%
$39,774
2.95%
$120,892
2.88%
$134,209
3.20%
$492,431
3.05%
Minnesota
$76,624
1.20%
$10,676
0.79%
$37,825
0.90%
$49,476
1.18%
$174,601
1.08%
Mississippi
$83,191
1.30%
$19,348
1.44%
$55,088
1.31%
$58,121
1.38%
$215,748
1.34%
Missouri
$108,784
1.70%
$22,623
1.68%
$59,610
1.42%
$68,592
1.63%
$259,609
1.61%
Montana
$17,744a
0.28%
$3,378a
0.25%
$14,691a
0.35%
$14,691a
0.35%
$50,504
0.31%
Nebraska
$31,637
0.50%
$5,303
0.39%
$16,829
0.40%
$20,674
0.49%
$74,443
0.46%
Nevada
$48,860
0.77%
$11,828
0.88%
$45,182
1.08%
$33,375
0.80%
$139,245
0.86%
New Hampshire
$17,744a
0.28%
$2,517a
0.19%
$12,782a
0.30%
$13,294a
0.32%
$46,337
0.29%
New Jersey
$158,160
2.48%
$27,237
2.02%
$81,029
1.93%
$102,005
2.43%
$368,432
2.28%
New Mexico
$49,883
0.78%
$11,961
0.89%
$34,565
0.82%
$34,336
0.82%
$130,745
0.81%
New York
$457,550
7.17%
$98,444
7.31%
$352,457
8.40%
$287,588
6.85%
$1,196,039
7.42%
North Carolina
$184,041
2.88%
$43,793
3.25%
$123,220
2.94%
$125,434
2.99%
$476,487
2.95%
North Dakota
$15,189a
0.24%
$2,126a
0.16%
$11,504a
0.27%
$11,538a
0.27%
$40,357
0.25%
Ohio
$241,095
3.78%
$48,635
3.61%
$142,813
3.40%
$161,206
3.84%
$593,749
3.68%
Oklahoma
$81,224
1.27%
$17,564
1.30%
$48,451
1.15%
$52,676
1.25%
$199,914
1.24%
Oregon
$63,366
0.99%
$12,779
0.95%
$32,537
0.78%
$41,645
0.99%
$150,328
0.93%
Pennsylvania
$271,634
4.26%
$52,817
3.92%
$169,076
4.03%
$168,997
4.03%
$662,525
4.11%
CRS-9

link to page 13 link to page 13 link to page 13 link to page 13 link to page 13 link to page 13 link to page 13 link to page 13 link to page 13 link to page 13 link to page 13 link to page 13 link to page 13 link to page 13 link to page 13 link to page 13

Basic Grants
Concentration Grants
Targeted Grants
EFIG
Total Title I-A Grants
Percentage
Percentage
Percentage
Percentage
Percentage
Share of
Share of
Share of
Share of
Share of
Grant
Total
Grant
Total
Grant
Total
Grant
Total
Grant
Total
State
Amount
Allocation
Amount
Allocation
Amount
Allocation
Amount
Allocation
Amount
Allocation
Puerto Rico
$149,060a
2.34%
$36,486a
2.71%
$98,949
2.36%
$106,848
2.55%
$391,343
2.43%
Rhode Island
$21,801
0.34%
$3,974
0.29%
$14,691a
0.35%
$14,691a
0.35%
$55,157
0.34%
South Carolina
$107,315
1.68%
$25,326
1.88%
$69,503
1.66%
$74,347
1.77%
$276,490
1.71%
South Dakota
$17,744a
0.28%
$3,378a
0.25%
$14,691a
0.35%
$14,691a
0.35%
$50,504
0.31%
Tennessee
$127,705
2.00%
$29,735
2.21%
$85,050
2.03%
$86,051
2.05%
$328,541
2.04%
Texas
$620,639
9.72%
$139,186
10.33%
$440,414
10.49%
$425,369
10.13%
$1,625,608
10.08%
Utah
$34,441
0.54%
$5,057
0.38%
$20,011
0.48%
$22,788
0.54%
$82,296
0.51%
Vermont
$14,027a
0.22%
$2,267a
0.17%
$10,673a
0.25%
$10,733a
0.26%
$37,700
0.23%
Virginia
$117,467
1.84%
$22,236
1.65%
$67,157
1.60%
$70,212
1.67%
$277,073
1.72%
Washington
$107,909
1.69%
$18,809
1.40%
$53,305
1.27%
$70,317
1.68%
$250,340
1.55%
West Virginia
$40,864
0.64%
$9,479
0.70%
$22,390
0.53%
$28,507
0.68%
$101,239
0.63%
Wisconsin
$85,725
1.34%
$14,771
1.10%
$47,913
1.14%
$57,129
1.36%
$205,539
1.27%
Wyoming
$15,124a
0.24%
$2,069a
0.15%
$11,499a
0.27%
$11,459a
0.27%
$40,151
0.25%
Source: Table prepared by CRS based on unpublished data provided by the U.S. Department of Education (ED), Budget Service. FY2020 Title I-A grant amounts were
calculated by ED using the most current data available. Percentage shares of FY2020 allocation amounts were calculated by CRS.
Notes: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. Percentages were calculated based on unrounded numbers. Amounts shown in the table only reflect Title I-A
funds provided to states. These amounts are determined after funds have been reserved from the total Title I-A appropriation ($16.3 bil ion) for the Census Bureau,
Bureau of Indian Education, and outlying areas. For the purposes of Title I-A, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico are considered states.
a. The state received only a minimum state grant under this Title I-A formula.

CRS-10

FY2020 State Grants Under ESEA Title I-A

Author Information

Rebecca R. Skinner
Isobel Sorenson
Specialist in Education Policy
Research Assistant

Acknowledgments
Emma C. Nyhof, former CRS Research Assistant, also contributed to this report.

Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan
shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and
under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other
than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in
connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not
subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in
its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or
material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to
copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.

Congressional Research Service
R47078 · VERSION 1 · NEW
11