link to page 1 
 
 
January 19, 2022
State and Local Law Enforcement Officer Staffing 
Some policymakers have raised concerns about a perceived 
rate. The combination of reduced hiring and increases in 
police staffing crisis and what this might mean for public 
resignations and retirements led to a 1.6% decrease in the 
safety. This In Focus provides an overview of state and 
number of LEOs among these agencies, though in the 
local law enforcement officer (LEO) staffing levels, a 
largest agencies (500 or more officers) the decrease was 
discussion of some factors identified as potentially 
3.1%. 
contributing to LEO attrition, what effect attrition might 
have on public safety, and federal funding to help law 
Factors Potentially Affecting Staffing 
enforcement agencies (LEAs) hire officers.  
Some point to increased scrutiny of LEOs and their tactics 
in the wake of cases where on-duty police officers killed 
Number of LEOs 
alleged suspects as a reason why officers are leaving the 
Table 1 presents data on the number of full-time LEOs 
force and why LEAs are having difficulty recruiting new 
employed by state and local law enforcement agencies from 
officers. Evidence of how heightened scrutiny of LEOs 
the Census Bureau’s Annual Survey of Public Employment 
might contribute to reductions in LEO staffing is largely 
and Payroll. The number of LEOs increased each year from 
anecdotal. 
2014 to 2020 after three years of decreases from 2011 to 
2013. The relatively steady increase in the number of LEOs 
A 2021 study of LEO turnover in one “large, capital city 
since 2014 helped offset the losses in LEO employment that 
jurisdiction in the western [United States]” found there 
occurred from 2011 to 2013. The fairly consistent rate of 
were no changes in trends in retirements and involuntary 
LEOs per 1,000 people since 2014 indicates that LEO 
separations after the 2020 death of George Floyd in 
employment has kept pace with U.S. population growth.  
Minneapolis and the resulting scrutiny of LEO tactics, but 
there was a nearly three-fold increase in resignations 
Table 1. LEOs in the United States, 2011-2020 
compared to what would have been expected if past trends 
persisted, though the authors were not able to identify the 
Year 
Number of LEOs 
Rate per 1,000 People 
specific reasons why officers resigned. Some LEOs have 
2011 
702,759 
2.3 
reportedly left their departments because they feel they do 
not have the community’s support or fear they will be 
2012 
674,614 
2.1 
charged with crimes for actions that result in someone’s 
2013 
672,060 
2.1 
injury or death, even if they were following departmental 
policies.   
2014 
678,896 
2.1 
While some point to current tensions around law 
2015 
683,850 
2.1 
enforcement as the reason for why LEOs are leaving their 
2016 
687,643 
2.1 
departments, law enforcement was facing staffing issues 
before George Floyd’s death. A 2019 PERF report on a 
2017 
698,277 
2.1 
workforce crisis noted that “most law enforcement agencies 
2018 
710,428 
2.2 
are sensing a crisis in their ability to recruit new officers, 
and to hold on to the ones they have.” PERF identified three 
2019 
711,583 
2.2 
reasons why law enforcement leaders were concerned about 
2020 
718,217 
2.2 
staffing: (1) fewer people are applying to become police 
officers; (2) more LEOs are leaving their departments, and 
Source: Census Bureau’s Annual Survey of Public Employment and 
in many cases the profession, before retirement age; and (3) 
Payroll. Rate calculated by the Congressional Research Service using 
a growing number of current LEOs are becoming eligible 
U.S. population estimates from the Census Bureau. 
for retirement. More recently, it is not clear to what extent 
stresses of the COVID-19 pandemic (e.g., potential 
The Census Bureau has not published LEO employment 
exposure to COVID-19, requirements to work extensive 
data for 2021; a June 2021 report from the Police Executive 
overtime to cover shifts because other officers are sick) 
Research Forum (PERF) suggests that some LEAs continue 
contributed to any recent LEO departures across the 
to struggle to fill open positions. In May 2021, PERF 
country. 
surveyed a non-representative sample of 194 LEAs about 
staffing changes in their agencies. LEAs were asked how 
Some point to efforts to “defund the police” in some cities 
many LEOs were hired, resigned, or retired during two 
(i.e., efforts to move resources from law enforcement 
periods: April 1, 2019, to March 31, 2020, and April 1, 
agencies to other social service agencies that can aid in 
2020, to March 31, 2021. Responding agencies reported a 
addressing social problems that LEAs currently handle) as a 
5% decrease in the overall hiring rate, an 18% increase in 
reason for decreases in LEA staffing. An analysis of the 
the resignation rate, and a 45% increase in the retirement 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
State and Local Law Enforcement Officer Staffing 
budgets of the 50 largest cities in the United States by 
increases in violent and property crimes after Newark, NJ, 
Bloomberg CityLab found that in aggregate these cities 
laid off 13% of its police officers in 2010. In comparison, 
reduced funding for LEAs by 5.2% from 2020 to 2021. 
the adjacent Jersey City, NJ, was able to forgo layoffs, and 
However, the LEAs’ share of general expenditures in these 
experienced decreases in violent and property crime during 
cities increased from 13.6% to 13.7% during the same 
the same period.  
period. In many cases, LEAs’ budgets were reduced as a 
part of a broader pandemic-related budget cut, hence LEA 
Research suggests that police practices, rather than the size 
funding accounted for a slightly higher proportion of 
of the police force, are a more important consideration for 
overall general expenditures even though funding for the 
crime prevention. A 2018 review of the literature by the 
LEAs decreased. Of the 50 cities in the analysis, 23 reduced 
National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 
funding for their police departments, with reductions 
found that certain targeted, proactive policing strategies—
ranging from 5% or less in most cities to 15% in both 
such as hot spots, problem-oriented policing, and focused 
Minneapolis, MN, and New York City, and 33% in Austin, 
deterrence—are effective at reducing crime. Other research 
TX. It is unclear whether any of these budget reductions 
suggests crime is not equally distributed across a city; it 
resulted in a reduction in force by terminating or 
tends to be concentrated in certain neighborhoods or even 
reassigning LEOs. It is possible that some LEAs absorbed 
on particular blocks, so even with fewer LEOs available to 
the budget cuts by leaving positions unfilled, not replacing 
a department, the LEA still might be able to have a 
retiring officers, or not funding planned raises. 
significant deterrent effect if it can properly reallocate its 
resources. There may be a point at which staffing is too low 
Effects on Public Safety 
for an LEA to effectively implement targeted, proactive 
Interest in LEA staffing levels stems from concerns among 
policing strategies in all of the jurisdiction’s hot spots. 
some policymakers about what effect they might have on 
public safety. Some have pointed to cities that reduced their 
COPS Hiring Grants 
police department’s budget and experienced increases in 
The Department of Justice awards grants to state, local, and 
homicides and other violent crimes (murder, rape, robbery, 
tribal governments to hire LEOs through the COPS hiring 
and aggravated assault) in the first three quarters (i.e., 
program (CHP). While a potential increase in the amount of 
through September 30) of 2021 compared to the same 
CHP grants might be able to help more LEAs hire new 
period in 2020 to suggest that the cuts contributed to higher 
LEOs, this solution assumes that LEAs are not filling their 
crime rates. However, increases in violent crime were 
ranks because they do not have the necessary budgetary 
widespread in the first three quarters of 2021 and occurred 
resources. Additional funding for CHP might not help 
in many of the country’s largest cities, even in those that 
LEAs fill vacant positions if agencies have difficulty 
increased funding for LEAs. Also, for many large cities, 
attracting new recruits. Grant funds cannot be used to 
violent crimes increased in 2020 relative to 2019, so for 
provide incentives to help recruit or retain officers.   
many of these cities, the increases in 2021 were the 
continuation of what occurred in 2020.   
Congress has continued to fund CHP although authorized 
appropriations expired at the end of FY2009. 
Those concerned about the effect of fewer LEOs on public 
Reauthorization of the COPS program might present 
safety point to studies showing that more police officers 
policymakers with a chance to encourage LEAs to adopt 
contribute to decreases in crime. They argue these studies 
policies and practices that could help foster better police-
suggest a decrease in police force size will result in more 
community relations, which in turn might help LEAs retain 
crime. While research on the relationship between the size 
current and recruit new LEOs. As a means of promoting 
of police forces and crime is mixed, a 2016 meta-analysis 
better police-community relations, Congress could consider 
of 62 studies conducted from 1971 to 2013 concluded the 
requiring LEAs to demonstrate that they are trying to 
relationship between the size of a police force and crime is 
recruit a diverse set of candidates for LEO positions that 
“negative, small, and not statistically significant.” However, 
reflect the jurisdiction’s demographics, require LEOs hired 
more recent research suggests that increases in the number 
with CHP funds to be bilingual, or require LEOs to reside 
of LEOs might contribute to decreases in crime, especially 
in the jurisdiction in which they work. Policymakers might 
violent crime, and particularly murder. For example, a 2019 
consider whether to allow LEAs to use COPS grants to 
study used a natural experiment created by cities that 
survey the public about the LEA’s performance.  
received Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) 
hiring grants in 2009 under the American Recovery and 
Congress could also consider allowing COPS grants to be 
Reinvestment Act (P.L. 111-5); it estimated that one 
used for purposes other than LEOs’ salaries that could help 
additional LEO contributed to 0.1 fewer murders, 0.5 fewer 
LEAs hire and retain officers. Policymakers might consider 
rapes, and 2.0 fewer robberies. Another 2019 study utilizing 
whether to allow LEAs to use COPS grants for hiring or 
data from California estimated that one additional LEO 
retention bonuses, to provide housing stipends for officers 
prevented six property crimes and one violent crime. 
who live in the jurisdiction, or to help LEOs repay student 
loans or take college courses that could help them advance 
While some research on increases in the number of LEOs, 
in the department. Congress might also consider whether to 
which tend to be gradual, suggests that more police can 
allow COPS grants to be used for programs to promote law 
reduce crime, there is little research on the effects of 
enforcement careers in high schools and colleges. 
marginal decreases in the size of a police force and its 
effects on crime. A 2020 study of a significant and drastic 
Nathan James, Analyst in Crime Policy   
reduction in the size of a police force found there were 
IF12022
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
State and Local Law Enforcement Officer Staffing 
 
 
Disclaimer 
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to 
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. 
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has 
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the 
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be 
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include 
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you 
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 
 
https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF12022 · VERSION 1 · NEW