INSIGHTi

FY2022 NDAA: Active Component End-
Strength
Updated January 4, 2022
Background
The term end-strength refers to either the authorized or actual personnel strength of a specified branch of
the military on September 30th of a given year (i.e., the last day of the fiscal year).
Each year, in the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), Congress sets an authorized end-strength
for active component personnel in each of the armed forces. The term authorized strength means “the
largest number of members authorized to be in an armed force, a component, a branch, a grade, or any
other category of the armed forces” (10 U.S.C. §101(b)(11)). Authorized end-strengths are maximum
strength levels on September 30th, the end of the fiscal year. Congress also periodically sets minimum
end-strength levels for the active component, which may be identical to or lower than the authorized end-
strength.
While Congress authorizes minimum and maximum end-strengths, each military service manages its
force, through recruiting and retention efforts, to achieve an actual end-strength. The actual end-strength
is the number of individuals who are members of a given armed force on September 30th. Normally, this
actual end-strength falls within the congressionally authorized minimum and maximum end-strengths.
However, there are circumstances in which the actual end-strength may fall outside the authorized range.
For example, under 10 U.S.C. §115(f), the Secretary of Defense can increase the active component end-
strength of any armed force above the authorized end-strength by up to 3%. On the other hand, recruiting
and retention shortfalls may cause one or more of the armed forces to fall below their minimum
authorized strength.
Congress varies the authorized end-strengths over time in response to various factors, such as national
security priorities, force structure changes, and budgetary constraints. For example, from FY2001-
FY2011, in response to the demands of wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, Congress substantially increased the
authorized strength of the Army and Marine Corps. Then, from FY2011-FY2016, Congress reversed
those increases in light of the withdrawal of most U.S. forces from Iraq in 2011, the drawdown of U.S.
forces in Afghanistan beginning in 2012, and budgetary constraints.
Congressional Research Service
https://crsreports.congress.gov
IN11780
CRS INSIGHT
Prepared for Members and
Committees of Congress

---

link to page 2
Congressional Research Service
2
Figure 1 below depicts changes the actual end-strength of the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force
from FY2001-FY2021. The Air Force line includes Space Force personnel for FY2020-FY2021.

Figure 1. Actual End-Strength of Active Component Armed Forces, FY2001-FY2021

Source: Defense Manpower Data Center, at https://dwp.dmdc.osd.mil/dwp/app/dod-data-reports/workforce-reports.

FY2022 NDAA
The Biden Administration’s FY2022 budget requested end-strengths of 485,000 for the Army, 346,200 for
the Navy, 178,500 for the Marine Corps, 328,300 for the Air Force, and 8,400 for the Space Force. In
comparison to FY2021 authorized end-strengths, these requests represented decreases for the Army (-
900), Navy (-1,600), Marine Corps (-2,700), and Air Force (-5,175), plus an initial Space Force request of
8,400.
In the FY2020 NDAA, Congress authorized the establishment of the United States Space Force, a new
armed force within the Department of the Air Force. At first, Air Force strength authorizations were used
to assign personnel to the Space Force. However, the FY2021 NDAA conference report (H.Rept. 116-
617) stated, “The conferees expect the Department of the Air Force to submit a formal request and
justification for [U.S. Space Force] end strength to the congressional defense committees as part of the
President’s Department of Defense budget request for fiscal year 2022.” As a result, the President’s
FY2022 budget request asked for a Space Force end-strength authorization of 8,400.
The initial House-passed version of the FY2022 NDAA, H.R. 4350, sought end-strengths that were
identical to the Administration request. The Senate Armed Services Committee reported version, S. 2792,
sought end-strengths that were identical to the Administration request for the Army, Navy, Marine Corps,
and Space Force, but a higher end-strength for the Air Force (+920 compared to the Administration
request).
The enacted version of the FY2022 NDAA, S. 1605 (P.L. 117-81), authorized end-strengths identical to
the Administration’s request for the Army, Marine Corps and Space Force, but higher end-strengths for
the Navy (+720) compared to the Administration request) and Air Force (+920).

---

link to page 3 Congressional Research Service
3
See Table 1 for a comparison of active component end-strength authorizations in the three versions of the
FY2022 NDAA discussed above.
See Table 2 for a comparison of the FY2021 congressionally authorized end-strengths, the FY2022
President’s budget request, and the FY2022 congressionally authorized end-strengths.
Table 1. Comparison of FY2022 NDAA Active Component End-Strength Provisions

H.R. 4350
S. 2792
P.L. 117-81
House Passed
SASC Reported
Enacted

Sec. 401 would have authorized a
Sec. 401 would have authorized a
Sec. 401 authorizes a total active duty
total active duty end-strength of
total active duty end-strength of
end-strength of 1,348,040 as of
1,346,400 as of September 20, 2022,
1,347,320 as of September 20, 2022,
September 20, 2022, including:
including:
including:
485,000 for the Army
485,000 for the Army
485,000 for the Army
346,920 for the Navy
346,200 for the Navy
346,200 for the Navy
178,500 for the Marine Corps
178,500 for the Marine Corps
178,500 for the Marine Corps
329,220 for the Air Force
328,300 for the Air Force
329,220 for the Air Force
8,400 for the Space Force
8,400 for the Space Force
8,400 for the Space Force

Table 2. Comparison of FY2021 and FY2022 Active Component End Strength
FY2021 Authorized, FY2022 President’s Budget Request, FY2022 Authorized
Difference
Difference
Between
Between
Service
FY2022
FY2021
FY2021
FY2021
President’s
Authorized and FY2022 NDAA Authorized and
Authorized
Budget
FY22 Budget
Authorized
FY2022
(P.L. 116-283)
Request
Request
(P.L. 117-81)
Authorized
Army
485,900
485,000
-900
485,000
-900
Navy
347,800
346,200
-1,600
346,920
-880
Marine Corps
181,200
178,500
-2,700
178,500
-2,700
Air Force
333,475
328,300
-5,175
329,220
-4,255
Space Force
n.a.*
8,400
+8,400
8,400
+8,400
Total
1,348,375
1,346,400
-1,975
1,348,040
-335
Notes: The FY2021 NDAA did not specify an authorized end-strength for the Space Force, but the FY2022 President’s
Budget Request lists the Space Force’s FY2021 end-strength as 6,400. This appears to reflect the projected actual end-
strength number for the Space Force rather than the authorized end-strength (see discussion above).

---

Congressional Research Service
4
Author Information

Lawrence Kapp

Specialist in Military Personnel Policy




Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff
to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of
Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of
information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role.
CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United
States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However,
as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the
permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.

IN11780 · VERSION 5 · UPDATED

---