Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small
September 10, 2021
Business Procurement Program
Robert Jay Dilger
The Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) Procurement Program is
Senior Specialist in
intended to provide SDVOSBs greater access to federal contracting opportunities. The program is
American National
designed to help federal agencies achieve the government’s statutory goal of awarding
Government
SDVOSBs at least 3% of the total value of all prime and subcontract dollars awarded each fiscal

year. The program is federal government-wide with two sets of similar, but not identical,
regulations; one issued by the Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and another

issued by the U.S. Small Business Administration’s (SBA’s) Administrator for all other federal
agencies.
Under this program, federal contracting officers may set aside (reserve) federal contracts (or orders) for bidding by
SDVOSBs exclusively. Federal agencies may also award sole source contracts, without competition, to SDVOSBs under the
following conditions:
 the contracting officer does not have a reasonable expectation that it will receive offers from two or more
eligible SDVOSBs;
 the contract requirement is not currently being performed (or accepted to be performed) by an 8(a)
Business Development Program participant;
 the SDVOSB has been determined to be a responsible contractor with respect to performance; the award
can be made at a fair and reasonable price; and
 the contract’s anticipated total value, including any options, does not exceed $4 million ($7 million for
manufacturing contracts).
To participate in the program, an SDVOSB must
 be small, as defined in Section 3(q) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. §632(q)) and the SBA’s
implementing regulations (13 C.F.R. §125);
 be at least 51% unconditionally and directly owned and controlled by one or more service-disabled
veterans;
 have one or more service-disabled veterans manage day-to-day operations and make long-term decisions;
and
 be owned by one or more eligible veterans that have a service-connected disability as determined by VA
(see 38 U.S.C. §101(2) and 13 C.F.R. §125.11).
SDVOSBs generally self-certify their eligibility for contracting preferences and are subject to criminal and civil sanctions if
they are found to have made false or fraudulent claims. SDVOSBs may be suspended or debarred, which would preclude
them from being awarded new federal contracts for the duration of the suspension or debarment, to ensure that federal
agencies award contracts to responsible contractors capable of successful performance. SDVOSBs seeking VA contracts with
an SDVOSB contracting preference must be certified as such through VA’s VETS First Verification Program.
P.L. 106-50, the Veterans Entrepreneurship and Small Business Development Act of 1999, authorized the 3% SDVOSB
procurement goal. P.L. 108-183, the Veterans Benefits Act of 2003, provided the authority allowing federal procurement
officers to award SDVOSB set-aside and sole source awards. The federal government achieved the 3% SDVOSB
procurement goal for the first time in FY2012, and it has met the goal each fiscal year since then (4.28% in FY2020).
This report examines the SDVOSB program’s legislative origins, SDVOSB contracting data, and recent congressional action
relating to SDVOSB program certification. The report discusses P.L. 116-283, the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021, which requires VA to transfer, by January 1, 2023, the maintenance of its
SDVOSB database to the SBA, provide the SBA compensation for doing so, and abolish VA’s Center for Verification and
Evaluation and transfer its function to the SBA . In addition, the SBA is required to establish a government-wide SDVOSB
certification and periodic recertification process by January 1, 2023. VA is to continue to determine whether an individual
qualifies as a service-disabled veteran.
Congressional Research Service

Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Procurement Program

Introduction
The Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Smal Business (SDVOSB) Procurement Program is one of
several contracting programs Congress has approved to provide greater opportunities for smal
businesses to win federal contracts. Congress’s interest in promoting smal business contracting
dates back to World War II and the outbreak of fighting in Korea. At that time, Congress found
that war-induced shortages of materials, coupled with an inability to obtain defense contracts or
financial assistance, threatened thousands of smal businesses.1 In 1953, concerned that many
smal businesses might fail without government assistance, Congress passed, and President
Dwight D. Eisenhower signed into law, the Smal Business Act (P.L. 83-163). The act authorized
the U.S. Smal Business Administration (SBA).
The Smal Business Act specifies that it is Congress’s declared policy to promote the interests of
smal businesses to “preserve free competitive enterprise.”2 Congress indicated that one way to
preserve free competitive enterprise was to increase market competition by ensuring that smal
businesses receive a “fair proportion” of federal contracts and subcontracts.3
Since 1953, Congress has used its broad authority to impose requirements on the federal
procurement process to help smal businesses receive a fair proportion of federal contracts and
subcontracts, primarily by establishing federal procurement goals and various contracting
preferences—including restricted competitions (set-asides), sole source awards, and price
evaluation adjustment/preference in unrestricted competitions—for smal businesses.4 Congress
has authorized the following:
 government-wide and agency-specific procurement goals for the percentage of
federal contract dollars awarded to smal businesses general y (at least 23%) and
for the percentage of federal contract and subcontract dollars awarded to smal
businesses owned and controlled by social y and economical y disadvantaged
individuals (at least 5%), women (at least 5%), and service-disabled veterans (at

1 U.S. Congress, Senate Select Committee on Small Business, Small Business Administration, committee print, 83rd
Cong., 1st sess., August 10, 1953 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1953), p. iii; and U.S. Congress, House Committee on
Banking and Currency, Sm all Business Act of 1953, report to accompany H.R. 5141, 83rd Cong., 1st sess., May 28,
1953, H.Rept. 83-494 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1953). For further information related to small business contracting, see
CRS Report R45576, An Overview of Sm all Business Contracting, by Robert Jay Dilger.
2 For more information about P.L. 83-163, the Small Business Act of 1953 (as amended), see https://www.govinfo.gov/
content/pkg/COMPS-1834/pdf/COMPS-1834.pdf; and 15 U.S.C. §631(a).
3 U.S. Congress, House Committee on Small Business, Small Business Contracting Program Improvements Act, report
to accompany H.R. 3867, 110th Cong., 1st sess., October 22, 2007, H.Rept. 110-400 (Washington, DC: GPO, 2007), p.
4.
4 Set-aside is a commonly used term to refer to a contract competition in which only small businesses, or specific types
of small businesses, may compete. Set -asides can be total or partial, depending on whether the entire procurement, or
just a severable segment of it, is restricted.
Sole source awards are noncompetitive procurements made after soliciting and negotiating with one source.
A price evaluation adjustm ent/preference involves a reduction in the price of bids or offers by eligible parties (in this
case for small businesses located in a Historically Underutilized Business Zone [HUBZone]). T he reduction is
generally equivalent to a certain percentage of the price of the bid or offer. For example, a 10% price evaluation
adjustment made to a $100,000 bid would result in the bid being reduced for comparative purposes by $10,000 to
$90,000. $90,000 would then be used in determining which bid or offer is lowest priced or represents the “best value”
for the government. “ Best value” is determined based on price and various nonprice evaluation factors selected by the
federal agency. For more information related to best value, see 48 C.F.R. §15.304.
Congressional Research Service

1

Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Procurement Program

least 3%), and for smal businesses located in a Historical y Underutilized
Business Zone (HUBZone) (at least 3%);5
 an annual Smal Business Goaling Report and Smal Business Procurement
Scorecards to measure progress in meeting those procurement goals;
 a general requirement for federal agencies to reserve (set aside) contracts that
have an anticipated value greater than the micro-purchase threshold (general y
$10,000) but not greater than the simplified acquisition threshold (general y
$250,000);6
 under specified conditions, a requirement for federal agencies to set aside
exclusively for smal businesses contracts that have an anticipated value greater
than the simplified acquisition threshold (set-aside is a commonly used term to
refer to a contract competition in which only smal businesses, or specific types
of smal businesses, may compete);7
 federal agencies to make sole source awards, without competition, to smal
businesses when the award could not otherwise be made (e.g., only a single
source is available, under urgent and compel ing circumstances);
 federal agencies to set aside contracts for, or grant other contracting preference
to, specific types of smal businesses (e.g., 8(a) Business Development Program
participants, HUBZone smal businesses, women-owned and control ed smal

5 For the small businesses generally procurement goal, see P.L. 100-656, the Business Opportunity Development
Reform Act of 1988 (20%), and P.L. 105-135, the Small Business Reauthorization Act of 1997 (23%). For the small
disadvantaged businesses (SDBs) procurement goal, including 8(a) Business Development Program participants, see
P.L. 100-656, the Business Opportunity Development Reform Act of 1988. For the women-owned small businesses
(WOSBs) procurement goal, see P.L. 103-355, the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act of 1994 . For the HUBZone
small businesses procurement goal, see P.L. 105-135, the HUBZone Act of 1997—Title VI of the Small Business
Reauthorization Act of 1997. For the small businesses owned and controlled by a service-disabled veteran-owned small
business (SDVOSB) procurement goal, see P.L. 106-50, the Veterans Entrepreneurship and Small Business
Development Act of 1999.
T he federal government uses aspirational procurement goals instead of requiring federal agencies to award specific
percentages of federal contracts to various types of small businesses primarily to avoid legal challenges under the equal
protection component of the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause. See, for example, City of Richmond v. J.A.
Croson Co., 488 U.S. 469 (1989) (finding unconstitutional a municipal ordinance that required the city’s prime
contractors to award at least 30% of the value of each contract to minority subcontractors) and Adarand Constructors,
Inc. v. Pena 515 U.S. 200 (1995) (finding that all racial classifications, whether imposed by federal, state, or local
authorities, must pass strict scrutiny review).
6 T he contracting officer must have a reasonable expectation that offers will be obtained from two or more responsible
small businesses (Rule of T wo) that are competitive in terms of market prices, quality, and delivery of the goods or
services being purchased. See P.L. 115-91, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018; 15 U.S.C.
§644(j)(1); and Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) §19.502 -2.
7 See FAR §19.203(c):
For acquisitions of supplies or services that have an anticipated dollar value exceeding the
simplified acquisition threshold … the contracting officer shall first consider an acquisition for the
small business socioeconomic contracting programs (i.e., 8(a), HUBZone, SDVOSB, or WOSB
programs) before considering a small business set -aside (see FAR §19.502-2(b)). However, if a
requirement has been accepted by the Small Business Administration (SBA) under the 8(a)
Program, it must remain in the 8(a) Program unless the SBA agrees to its release in accordance
with 13 C.F.R. parts 124, 125, and 126.
Before setting aside an acquisition over the simplified acquisition threshold for small businesses, t he contracting officer
must have a reasonable expectation that offers will be obtained from two or more responsible small businesses (Rule of
T wo) that are competit ive in terms of market prices. See FAR §19.502-2.
Congressional Research Service

2

Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Procurement Program

businesses [WOSBs], and smal businesses owned and controlled by service
disabled veterans [SDVOSBs]);8 and
 the SBA and other federal procurement officers to review and restructure
proposed procurements to maximize opportunities for smal business
participation.
The smal business procurement goals are designed to encourage federal procurement officers to
award contracts to smal businesses. There are no punitive consequences for not meeting these
procurement goals. But, the SBA’s annual government-wide and agency-specific Smal Business
Procurement Scorecards (SBA scorecards) and the General Services Administration’s (GSA’s)
annual Smal Business Goaling Report (which serves as the SBA scorecards’ data source), are
distributed widely, receive media attention, and heighten public awareness of smal business
contracting.9 For example, Members often cite agency performance, as reported in the SBA
scorecards, during their questioning of federal agency witnesses during congressional hearings.
As a result, senior agency officials may encourage federal procurement officers to increase
contracting opportunities for smal businesses general y, or for specific types of smal businesses,
to address any perceived weaknesses in the SBA’s scorecards or GSA’s Smal Business Goaling
Report.
Occasional y, presidential statements, directives, or executive orders also encourage federal
procurement officers to award contracts to smal businesses. For example, on June 1, 2021, the
Biden Administration announced that it
is launching an all-of-government effort to expand contracting opportunit ies for
underserved small businesses across the country. At its center is a new goal: increasing the
share of contracts going to small disadvantaged businesses by 50 percent by 2026 [from
10% of small business eligible contract dollars to 15%]—translating to an additional $100
billion to SDBs [small disadvantaged businesses] over the 5-year period. To achieve this
goal, agencies will assess every available tool to lower barriers to entry and increase
opportunities for small businesses and traditionally-underserved entrepreneurs to compete
for federal contracts.10
Additional requirements are in place to maximize smal business participation as prime
contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers. For example, before issuing a solicitation, federal
contracting officers must do the following, among other requirements:
 divide proposed acquisitions of supplies and services (except construction) into
reasonably smal lots to permit offers on quantities less than the total
requirement;

8 For 8(a) Business Development Program participants, see P.L. 95-507, A bill to amend the Small Business Act and
the Small Business Investment Act of 1958; and 15 U.S.C. §637(a). For HUBZone participants, see P.L. 105-135, the
HUBZone Act of 1997—T itle VI of the Small Business Reauthorization Act of 1997; and 15 U.S.C. §657a. For
WOSBs, see H.R. 5654, the Small Business Reauthorization Act of 2000, incorporated by reference in P.L. 106-554,
the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2001 ; and 15 U.S.C. §637(m). For SDVOSBs, see P.L. 108-183, the Veterans
Benefits Act of 2003; and 15 U.S.C. §657f.
9 See SBA, “ Small business procurement scorecard overview,” at https://www.sba.gov/document/support-small-
business-procurement -scorecard-overview; and U.S. General Services Administration (GSA), “ SAM.gov: DAT A Bank
Static Reports, Small Business Goaling Reports,” at https://sam.gov/reports/awards/static.
10 T he White House (Biden), “ FACT SHEET : Biden-⁠Harris Administration Announces New Actions to Build Black
Wealth and Narrow the Racial Wealth Gap,” June 1, 2021, at https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-
releases/2021/06/01/fact-sheet-biden-harris-administration-announces-new-actions-to-build-black-wealth-and-narrow-
the-racial-wealth-gap/.
Congressional Research Service

3

Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Procurement Program

 plan acquisitions such that, if practicable, more than one smal business concern
may perform the work if the work exceeds the amount for which a surety may be
guaranteed by the SBA against loss under 15 U.S.C. §694b (general y $6.5
mil ion, or $10 mil ion if the contracting officer certifies that the higher amount
is necessary);11
 encourage prime contractors to subcontract with smal business concerns,
primarily through the agency’s role in negotiating an acceptable smal business
subcontracting plan with prime contractors on contracts anticipated to exceed
$700,000 or $1.5 mil ion for construction contracts;12 and
 under specified circumstances, provide a copy of the proposed acquisition
package to an SBA procurement center representative (PCR) for review,
comment, and recommendation at least 30 days before the issuance of the
solicitation. If the contracting officer rejects the PCR’s recommendation, the
officer must document the basis for the rejection and notify the PCR. The PCR
may appeal the rejection to the chief of the contracting office and, ultimately, to
the agency head.13
Under the SDVOSB program, federal contracting officers may set aside federal contracts (or
orders) for bidding by SDVOSBs exclusively when it is in the interest of (1) maintaining or
mobilizing the nation’s full productivity, war, or national defense programs; or (2) ensuring that
smal businesses receive a fair proportion of government contracts in each industry.14 The
contracting officer must have a reasonable expectation that offers wil be obtained from two or
more responsible SDVOSBs (Rule of Two) that are competitive in terms of market prices, quality,
and delivery of the goods or services being purchased.
If the contracting officer does not expect the Rule of Two to be met, federal agencies may award
SDVOSBs sole source contracts if al of the following conditions are met:
 the contract requirement is not currently being performed (or accepted to be
performed) by an 8(a) Business Development Program participant;

11 For additional information and analysis concerning the Small Business Administration’s (SBA’s) Surety Bond
program, see CRS Report R42037, SBA Surety Bond Guarantee Program , by Robert Jay Dilger.
12 Subcontracting plans are not required from small businesses, for personal services contracts, for contracts or contract
modifications that will be performed entirely outside of the United States and its outlying areas, or for modifications
that were within the scope of the contract. “[A]ny contractor or subcontractor failing to comply in good faith with the
requirements of the subcontracting plan is in material breach of its contract.” FAR §19.702(c). In addition, see FAR
§19.702:
Any contractor receiving a contract with a value greater than the simplified acquisition threshold
must agree in the contract that small business, veteran-owned small business, service-disabled
veteran-owned small business, HUBZone small business, small disadvantaged business, and
women-owned small business concerns will have the maximum practicable opportunity to
participate in contract performance consistent with its efficient performance.
13 See FAR §19.202-1 for the specified conditions:
(i) T he proposed acquisition is for supplies or services currently being provided by a small business
and the proposed acquisition is of a quantity or estimated do llar value, the magnitude of which
makes it unlikely that small businesses can compete for the prime contract; (ii) T he proposed
acquisition is for construction and seeks to package or consolidate discrete construction projects
and the magnitude of this consolidation makes it unlikely that small businesses can compete for the
prime contract; or (iii) T he proposed acquisition is for a consolidated or bundled requirement.
See FAR §19.505 for a description of the appeals process.
14 FAR §19.502-1 and FAR §19.1403; and 13 C.F.R. §125.12-§125.16.
Congressional Research Service

4

link to page 22 Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Procurement Program

 the SDVOSB has been determined to be a responsible contractor with respect to
performance;
 the award can be made at a fair and reasonable price; and
 the contract’s anticipated total value, including any options, does not exceed $4
mil ion ($7 mil ion for manufacturing contracts).15
To participate in the SDVOSB procurement program, an SDVOSB must
 be small, as defined in Section 3(q) of the Smal Business Act (15 U.S.C.
§632(q)) and in the SBA’s implementing regulations (13 C.F.R. §125);
 be at least 51% unconditional y and directly owned and controlled by one or
more service-disabled veterans;
 have one or more service-disabled veterans manage day-to-day operations and
make long-term decisions; and
 be owned by one or more eligible veterans that has a service-connected disability
as determined by VA (see 38 U.S.C. §101(2) and 13 C.F.R §125.11).16
SDVOSBs general y self-certify their program eligibility and are subject to criminal and civil
sanctions for making false or fraudulent claims. SDVOSBs also may be suspended or debarred,
which would preclude them from being awarded new federal contracts for the duration of the
suspension or debarment, to ensure that federal agencies award contracts only to responsible
contractors that are capable of successful performance.17 SDVOSBs seeking VA contracts with a
SDVOSB contracting preference must be certified as such through VA’s VETS First Verification
Program. As of September 10, 2021, the SBA’s Dynamic Smal Business Search database of
smal businesses interested in bidding on federal contracts included 43,727 veteran-owned smal
businesses (VOSBs), including SDVOSBs, and 24,171 self-certified SDVOSBs.18
This report examines the SDVOSB program’s legislative origins, SDVOSB contracting data, and
recent congressional action relating to SDVOSB program certification. P.L. 116-283, the Wil iam
M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021, requires VA, by
January 1, 2023, to transfer the maintenance of its SDVOSB database to the SBA, provide the
SBA compensation for doing so, and abolish VA’s Center for Verification and Evaluation and
transfer its function to the SBA (see “VA-SBA Coordination Issues”). The SBA is required to
establish a government-wide SDVOSB certification and periodic recertification process by
January 1, 2023. VA is to continue to determine whether an individual qualifies as a service-
disabled veteran.

15 FAR §19.1406.
16 FAR §19.1403.
17 For additional information and analysis, see CRS Report R45322, Selected Legal Tools for Maintaining Government
Contractor Accountability, by David H. Carpenter. Also, see 18 U.S.C. §1001 (false statements); 18 U.S.C. §287 (false
claims); 18 U.S.C. §371 (conspiracy to defraud the government) ; and 48 C.F.R. §9.400-§9.409 (suspension and
debarment). T he SBA’s regulations on penalties for misrepresentations and false statements are contained in 13 C.F.R.
§121.108 for small businesses, 13 C.F.R. §124.501 for 8(a) small businesses, 13 C.F.R. §124.1004 for SDBs, 13 C.F.R.
§125.29 for veteran-owned small businesses (VOSBs) and SDVOSBs, 13 C.F.R. §126.900 for HUBZone small
businesses, and 13 C.F.R. §127.700 for WOSBs.
18 U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA), “Dynamic Small Business Search,” accessed on August 25, 2021, at
http://dsbs.sba.gov/dsbs/search/dsp_dsbs.cfm.
Congressional Research Service

5

Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Procurement Program

The SDVOSB Program’s Origins
The following sections provide an overview of the history of smal business contracting
preferences, focusing on executive and legislative actions that led to the SDVOSB program’s
creation.
The First Federal Small Business Procurement Programs
In 1942, Congress authorized the Smal er War Plants Corporation (SWPC) to make loans and
provide grants to smal businesses to finance plant construction, conversion, or expansion and to
enter into contracts with other federal agencies “to furnish articles, equipment, supplies, or
materials to the government.” Congress authorized the SWPC to subcontract those contracts to
smal businesses to ameliorate smal businesses’ financial difficulties while mobilizing “the
productive facilities of smal business in the interest of successful prosecution of the war.”19 The
SWPC’s subcontracting authority expired along with the SWCP at the end of World War II.
In 1951, at the onset of the Korean War, Congress authorized the Smal Defense Plants
Administration (SDPA), which general y was provided with the same powers as the SWPC.20 In
1953, Congress authorized the transfer of the SDPA’s subcontracting and other authorities to the
newly created SBA,21 with the intent that it would authorize these powers both in peacetime and
wartime.22
When the Smal Business Act of 1958 transformed the SBA into a permanent agency, this
subcontracting authority was included in Section 8(a) of the act.23 At its inception, the SBA’s
subcontracting authority was not limited, as it is today, to smal businesses owned and controlled
by social y and economical y disadvantaged individuals and specified disadvantaged groups
(collectively referred to as smal disadvantaged businesses, SDBs).24 Initial y, the SBA reportedly
rarely used this subcontracting authority, focusing instead upon its loan and other programs.25

19 P.L. 77-603, the Small Business Mobilization Act (June 11, 1942).
20 P.L. 82-96, An Act T o amend and extend the Defense Production Act of 1950 and the Housing and Rent Act of
1947, as amended (July 31, 1951).
21 P.L. 83-163, Reconstruction Finance Corporation Liquidation Act (July 30, 1953).
22 See U.S. Congress, House Committee on Banking and Currency, Small Business Act of 1953, report to accompany
H.R. 5141, 83rd Cong., 1st sess., May 28, 1953, H.Rept. 83-494 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1953), p. 2 (stating that the
SBA would “continue many of the functions of the [SDPA] in the present mobilization period and in addition would be
given powers and duties to encourage and assist small-business enterprises in peacetime as well as in any future war or
mobilization period”). Also, see U.S. Congress, Senate Committee on Banking and Currency, Small Business Act,
report to accompany H.R. 7963, 85th Cong., 2nd sess., June 16, 1958, pp. 9, 10 (stating that the act would “ put the
procurement assistance program on a peacetime basis”).
23 P.L. 85-536, as amended, §8(a)(1)-(2) (July 18, 1958).
24 T he SBA’s 8(a) Business Development Program eligibility was expanded during the 1980s to include four
disadvantaged groups: Community Development Corporations in 1981 ( P.L. 97-35, the Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act of 1981); Indian tribes and Alaska Native Corporations in 19 85 (P.L. 99-272, the Consolidated
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985); and Native Hawaiian Organizations in 1988 (P.L. 100-656, Business
Opportunity Development Reform Act of 1988). For further information and analysis of the 8(a) Business
Development Program, see CRS Report R44844, SBA’s “8(a) Program ”: Overview, History, and Current Issues, by
Robert Jay Dilger.
25 T homas Jefferson Hasty, III, “Minority Business Enterprise Development and the Small Business Administration’s
8(a) Program: Past, Present, and (Is T here a) Future?,” Military Law Review, vol. 145 (Summer 1994), pp. 1, 8
(hereinafter Jefferson Hasty, III, “Minority Business Enterprise Development and the SBA’s 8(a) Program”).
(“[B]ecause the SBA believed that the efforts to start and operate an 8(a) program would not be worthwhile in terms of
Congressional Research Service

6

Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Procurement Program

During the 1960s, President Lyndon B. Johnson created the Test Cities Program (PTCP), which
involved a smal -scale use of the SBA’s authority under Section 8(a) to award contracts to smal
businesses wil ing to locate in urban areas and hire unemployed individuals, largely African
Americans, or sponsor minority-owned businesses by providing capital or management
assistance.26 In 1970, under the Nixon Administration, the SBA issued the 8(a) program’s first
regulations, articulating the SBA’s policy of using Section 8(a) to “assist smal concerns owned
by disadvantaged persons to become self-sufficient, viable businesses capable of competing
effectively in the market place.”27
In 1978, P.L. 95-507, an act to amend the Smal Business Act and the Smal Business Investment
Act of 1958, provided the SBA express statutory authority for its 8(a) Minority Smal Business
and Capital Ownership Development Contracting Program (now cal ed the 8(a) Business
Development Program and commonly referred to as the 8(a) program).28 Under the 1978
amendments, the SBA can only subcontract under Section 8(a) with “social y and economical y
disadvantaged smal business concerns”;29 or businesses that are least 51% owned by one or more
social y and economical y disadvantaged individuals and whose management and daily
operations are controlled by such individual(s).30
P.L. 95-507 also authorized federal procurement officers to let (send) contracts to the SBA when
the SBA certifies to the officer that it can award the contract to competent and responsible smal
businesses owned and controlled by social y and economical y disadvantaged individuals. As a
result, the SBA’s 8(a) program became a federal government-wide procurement program.
During the 1980s, SBA 8(a) program eligibility was expanded to include four disadvantaged
groups:
 Community Development Corporations in 1981 (P.L. 97-35, the Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act of 1981),
 Indian tribes and Alaska Native Corporations in 1985 (P.L. 99-272, the
Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985), and
 Native Hawai an Organizations in 1988 (P.L. 100-656, the Business Opportunity
Development Reform Act of 1988).
Federal procurement laws continue to refer to smal businesses owned and controlled by social y
and economical y disadvantaged individuals. However, these four disadvantaged groups are

developing small business, the SBA’s power to contract with other government agencies essentially went unused. T he
program actually lay dormant for about fifteen years until the racial atmosphere of the 1960s provided the impetus to
wrestle the SBA’s 8(a) authority from its dormant state.”)
26 Jefferson Hasty, III, “Minority Business Enterprise Development and the SBA’s 8(a) Program,” pp. 11, 12.
27 13 C.F.R. §124.8-1(b) (1970).
28 P.L. 95-507, T o amend the Small Business Act and the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (October 24, 1978).
T he Clinton Administration changed the program’s name from the 8(a) Minority Small Business and Capital
Ownership Development Program to the 8(a) Business Development Program in 1988 “ to emphasize that individuals
need not be members of minority groups and to stress the importance of assisting participating firms in their overall
business development.” See SBA, “Small Business Size Regulations: 8(a) Business Development/Small Disadvantaged
Business Status Determinations; Rules of Procedure Governing Cases Before the Office of Hearings and Appeals,” 63
Federal Register 35727, June 30, 1998.
29 P.L. 95-507, T o amend the Small Business Act and the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 ; and 15 U.S.C.
§637(a)(4)(A)-(B).
30 P.L. 95-507, T o amend the Small Business Act and the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 ; and 15 U.S.C.
§637(a)(4)(A)-(B).
Congressional Research Service

7

link to page 12 Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Procurement Program

defined by law as social y and economical y disadvantaged smal business concerns.31 As a result,
GSA, which collects and reports federal procurement data used by the SBA, includes contracts
awarded to these four disadvantaged groups when reporting contract awards for meeting federal
procurement goals for smal businesses owned and controlled by social y and economical y
disadvantaged individuals (now cal ed the SDB procurement goal).
Government-Wide Small Business Procurement Goals and Set-
Aside and Sole Source Authority32
In 1978, P.L. 95-507 indicated that “it is the policy of the United States that smal business
concerns and smal business concerns owned and controlled by social y and economical y
disadvantaged individuals shal have the maximum practicable opportunity to participate in the
performance of contracts let by any Federal agency.”33 The act requires federal agency heads to
establish federal procurement goals annual y, in consultation with the SBA, “that realistical y
reflect the potential of smal business concerns and smal business concerns owned and controlled
by social y and economical y disadvantaged individuals” to participate in federal procurement.34
The act required each agency, at the conclusion of each fiscal year, to report its progress in
meeting these goals to the SBA, and the SBA was required to submit this information to the
House and Senate Smal Business Committees. In 2013, this reporting requirement was expanded
to require the SBA to submit a report on federal agency progress in meeting smal business
procurement goals to the President and Congress and to make the report (now cal ed the Smal
Business Procurement Scorecard) available on a public website.35
As mentioned, federal government-wide procurement goals have been established for
 smal businesses general y (23%),
 SDBs (which include SBA-certified SDBs, self-certified SDBs, 8(a) Business
Development Program participants, and 8(a) Business Development Program
joint ventures) (5%),
 WOSBs (5%),
 HUBZone smal businesses (3%), and
 SDVOSBs (3%).
These government-wide goals and the percentage of contracts awarded to smal businesses, by
type, in FY2020 are provided in Table 1. The percentage of federal smal business eligible
contract dollars awarded to smal businesses, including the required double counting of specific
types of contracts since FY2019, is used to determine if the goal has been achieved (see the
second and third columns).

31 15 U.S.C. §637(a)(4)(A)-(B).
32 For an overview of small business contracting programs, see CRS Report R45576, An Overview of Small Business
Contracting, by Robert Jay Dilger.
33 P.L. 95-507, a bill to amend the Small Business Act and the Small Business Investment Act of 1958; and 15 U.S.C.
§644(g)(1)(B).
34 P.L. 95-507, a bill to amend the Small Business Act and the Small Business Investment Act of 1958; and 15 U.S.C.
§644(g)(2).
35 P.L. 112-239, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013; and 15 U.S.C. §644(h)(2).
Congressional Research Service

8

Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Procurement Program

As wil be discussed, federal agencies may award sole source contracts to and set aside contracts
for bidding by smal businesses or specific types of smal businesses to help them meet these
goals.
Table 1. Federal Contracting Goals and Percentage of FY2020 Federal Contract
Dollars Awarded to Small Businesses, by Type
% of Small
Business Eligible
% of Small
Federal
Business Eligible
Contracts
Federal
% of All Federal
(including
Contracts
Contracts
required double
(excluding
(excluding
counting, see
required double
required double
Business Type
Federal Goal
Table notes)
counting)
counting)
Smal Businesses
23.0%
26.02%
25.42%
21.89%
Smal Disadvantaged
5.0%
10.54%
10.39%
9.08%
Businesses
Women-Owned Smal
5.0%
4.85%
4.71%
4.10%
Businesses
HUBZone Smal
3.0%
2.44%
2.39%
2.04%
Businesses
Service-Disabled
3.0%
4.28%
4.23%
3.92%
Veteran-Owned Smal
Businesses
Sources: U.S. Smal Business Administration (SBA), “Government-Wide Performance, FY2020 Smal Business
Procurement Scorecard,” at https://www.sba.gov/document/support-smal -business-procurement-scorecard-
overview; and data generated using U.S. General Service Administration, “Sam.Gov Data Bank: Ad Hoc Report,”
July 31, 2021, at https://sam.gov/reports/awards/adhoc (al reported contract dol ars).
Notes: In accordance with federal law, the SBA provided double credit, for scorecard purposes only, for prime
contracts awarded in disaster areas that are awarded as a local set aside and a smal business or other
socioeconomic set aside when the vendor state is the same as the place of performance (see 15 U.S.C. §644(f))
and for prime contracts awarded to businesses in Puerto Rico and covered territories (see 15 U.S.C. §644(x)(1)).
The Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) first-tier subcontract awards are also included as required by P.L. 113-76,
the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014 (§318).
The FY2020 Smal Business Procurement Scorecard was made available on July 30, 2021, and reflects contracting
data as of February 22, 2021. Smal business eligible contracts totaled $559.981 bil ion in FY2020 and $145.8
bil ion was awarded to smal businesses ($142.4 without double counting), $59.0 bil ion to smal disadvantaged
businesses ($58.2 bil ion without double counting), $27.1 bil ion to women -owned smal businesses ($26.4 bil ion
without double counting), $13.6 bil ion to SBA-certified HUBZone smal businesses ($13.4 bil ion without double
counting), and $23.9 bil ion to service-disabled veteran-owned smal businesses ($23.7 bil ion without double
counting). DOE’s first-tier subcontract awards in FY2020 were $3.36 bil ion to smal businesses, $0.81 bil ion to
smal disadvantaged businesses, $0.76 bil ion to smal women-owned businesses, $0.24 bil ion to SBA-certified
HUBZone smal businesses, and $0.23 bil ion to service-disabled veteran-owned smal businesses.
Small Businesses Generally and Small Disadvantaged Businesses36
P.L. 100-656, the Business Opportunity Development Reform Act of 1988, established a federal
government-wide goal of providing not less than 20% of the total value of al prime contract

36 For additional information and analysis of the SDB procurement goal and the 8(a) Business Development Program,
see CRS Report R44844, SBA’s “8(a) Program ”: Overview, History, and Current Issues, by Robert Jay Dilger.
Congressional Research Service

9

link to page 12 Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Procurement Program

awards for each fiscal year to smal businesses general y (increased to not less than 23% by P.L.
105-135) and not less than 5% of the total value of al prime contract and subcontract awards for
each fiscal year to smal businesses owned and controlled by social y and economical y
disadvantaged individuals (now cal ed the SDB procurement goal).37 These government-wide
goals became the SBA’s benchmark, and often its minimum floor, when negotiating procurement
goals with individual federal agencies each year.
P.L. 100-656 also authorized the SBA to set aside contracts for bidding by 8(a) program-eligible
participants exclusively if (1) there is a reasonable expectation that at least two eligible 8(a)
program participants wil submit offers that can be made at a fair market price; and (2) the
contract’s anticipated total value, including any options, general y exceeds $5.0 mil ion for
manufacturing contracts (now $7.5 mil ion) and $3.0 mil ion for al other acquisitions (now $4.5
mil ion). The act also authorized the SBA to award sole source contracts to any 8(a) program-
eligible smal business recommended by a federal procuring agency offering the contract
opportunity when (1) the smal business is determined to be a responsible contractor with respect
to performance of the contract opportunity; (2) the award is consistent with the 8(a) program
participant’s business plan; and (3) the contract’s anticipated total value, including any options,
does not exceed the set-aside thresholds (initial y $5.0 mil ion for manufacturing contracts [now
$7.5 mil ion] and $3.0 mil ion for al other acquisitions [now $4.5 mil ion]).38
P.L. 100-656 authorizes the SBA to enter into al types of contracts with other federal agencies.
This al ows the SBA to enter into partnership agreements and memoranda of understanding with
other federal agencies to delegate its 8(a) program authority, including the authority to set aside
contracts for and award sole source contracts to 8(a) program-eligible smal businesses, to these
agencies.39
As shown in Table 1, in FY2020, the federal government exceeded the 23% government-wide
procurement goal for smal businesses general y and the 5% government-wide goal for SDBs.
Women-Owned Small Businesses40
P.L. 103-355, the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act of 1994, established a WOSB federal
government-wide procurement goal of not less than 5% of the total value of al prime contract
and subcontract awards for each fiscal year. In 2000, federal agencies were authorized to set aside
contracts for WOSBs (then capped at $5.0 mil ion for manufacturing contracts and $3.0 mil ion
for al other acquisitions, including any options) to help federal agencies meet the 5% goal.41 In
2013, the set-aside caps were removed.42 In 2014, to help federal agencies meet the 5%
procurement goal, federal agencies were authorized to award WOSBs sole source contracts when

37 P.L. 105-135, the HUBZone Act of 1997—T itle VI of the Small Business Reauthorization Act of 1997.
38 Sole source award limits are adjusted for inflation on October 1 of each year that is evenly divisible by five. T he next
adjustment for inflation will take place on October 1, 2025. See P.L. 111-350, T o enact certain laws relating to public
contracts as title 41, United States Code, “ Public Contracts” (as amended); 41 U.S.C. §1908(c)(2); and FAR §19.805-1.
39 See 13 C.F.R. §124.501. For example, see SBA and U.S. Department o f Defense, “Partnership Agreement between
the U.S. Small Business Administration and the U.S. Department of Defense,” January 7, 2013, at
https://business.defense.gov/Portals/57/Documents/dod-sba-8a-partnership.pdf?ver=2020-03-11-131448-290.
40 For additional information and analysis of the WOSB federal contracting program, see CRS Report R46322, SBA
Wom en-Owned Sm all Business Federal Contracting Program , by Robert Jay Dilger.
41 H.R. 5654, the Small Business Reauthorization Act of 2000, incorporated by reference in P.L. 106-554, the
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2001; and 15 U.S.C. §637(m)(2).
42 P.L. 112-239, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013; and 15 U.S.C. §637(m)(2).
Congressional Research Service

10

link to page 12 link to page 12 Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Procurement Program

the contract’s anticipated total value, including any options, does not exceed $5.0 mil ion for
manufacturing contracts (now $7.0 mil ion) and $3.0 mil ion for al other acquisitions (now $4.5
mil ion).43
As shown in Table 1, in FY2020, the federal government did not met the 5% government-wide
procurement goal for WOSBs.
HUBZone Small Businesses44
In 1997, P.L. 105-135 established a federal government-wide goal of providing not less than 3%
of the total value of al prime contract awards for each fiscal year (phased-in over five years) to
smal businesses located within a HUBZone.45 P.L. 111-240, the Smal Business Jobs Act, added
the total value of subcontracts to the HUBZone government-wide procurement goal, bringing the
goal into conformity with other smal business subtype procurement goals.
To help federal agencies meet the 3% procurement goal, P.L. 105-135 also authorized them to set
aside contracts for HUBZone small businesses and to award these businesses sole source
contracts when the contract’s anticipated total value, including any options, does not exceed $5.0
mil ion for manufacturing contracts (now $7.5 mil ion) and $3.0 mil ion for al other acquisitions
(now $4.5 mil ion).46
In addition, when a contract is awarded on the basis of full and open competition and price is a
selection factor, HUBZone smal businesses are general y provided up to a 10% price evaluation
preference over other businesses (other than another smal business).
As shown in Table 1, in FY2020, the federal government did not met the 3% government-wide
goal for HUBZone smal businesses.
SDVOSBs’ Government-Wide Procurement Goal
P.L. 105-135 also required the SBA to study and submit to the House and Senate Smal Business
Committees a final report within nine months of enactment. The report was to document
SDVOSB needs, the availability and use of SBA programs by SDVOSBs, the percentage and
dollar value of SDVOSB federal contracts, and suggested or recommended methods to improve
the SBA’s and other agencies’ programs to serve SDVOSBs’ needs.
Several veterans’ organizations, including the American Legion and the Association for Service
Disabled Veterans, supported this requirement. It was general y viewed as a first step toward
establishing a SDVOSB government-wide procurement goal and including SDVOSBs in the
SBA’s 8(a) Minority Smal Business and Capital Ownership Development contracting program
(now cal ed the 8(a) Business Development Program).
These organizations argued that P.L. 93-237, an act to amend the Smal Business Act [1974],
required the SBA to “give special consideration to veterans of the Armed Forces of the United

43 See P.L. 113-291, the Carl Levin and Howard P. “ Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2015; 15 U.S.C. §637(m)(7)-(8); and FAR §19.1506.
44 For additional information and analysis of the HUBZone program, see CRS Report R41268, Small Business
Adm inistration HUBZone Program , by Robert Jay Dilger.
45 T he HUBZone contracting goal was not less than 1% of the total value of all prime contract awards for FY1999, not
less than 1.5% for FY2000, not less than 2% for FY2001, not less than 2.5% for FY2002, and not less than 3% for
FY2003 and each fiscal year thereafter.
46 See P.L. 105-135, the Small Business Reauthorization Act of 1997; 15 U.S.C. §657a; and FAR §19.1306.
Congressional Research Service

11

Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Procurement Program

States and their survivors or dependents.” Given this statutory directive, these organizations
argued that the SBA had erred in 1987 when it rejected a petition from John K. Lopez, chairman
of the Association for Service Disabled Veterans, to include disabled veterans in its list of groups
presumed to be social y disadvantaged in the 8(a) program.47
The SBA argued at that time that the 8(a) program was designed to address chronic and long-term
social discrimination by providing contracting preferences for minorities. The SBA
acknowledged that disabled veterans had experienced socioeconomic hardships but determined
that (1) these hardships were related to the disability itself, not prejudice against disabled
veterans; (2) these hardships did not meet the requirement of chronic and long-term social
discrimination because they did not predate the Vietnam era; (3) the petition did not make a
distinction between disabled veterans and disabled civilians (leading the SBA to conclude that the
appropriate protections sought were not to be found in the 8(a) program but through the
Rehabilitation Act); and (4) P.L. 93-237’s special consideration for veterans’ provision neither
necessitated mandatory eligibility for SBA programs or created a presumptive social disadvantage
for disabled veterans.48
In December 1998, the SBA contracted with the University of Massachusetts at Boston to prepare
the mandated report concerning the SBA’s assistance to disabled veterans. The law directed the
SBA to have the study completed and submitted to Congress by September 2, 1998. Due to
various budgetary issues and difficulties in obtaining data, the study was not completed until
November 10, 2000.49
In the meantime, on July 2, 1998, the SBA announced the formation of a Veterans Affairs Task
Force for Entrepreneurship, composed of 39 representatives of veterans’ service organizations
and advocacy groups, SBA officials, and SBA management and training resource partners, to
recommend ways the agency can better serve VOSBs.50 The task force completed its work in
October 1998 and presented its final report to then-SBA Administrator Aida Alvarez on
November 9, 1998.
The task force issued several high priority recommendations, including that the SBA promote a
10% government-wide procurement goal for VOSBs (including SDVOSBs) and recognize

47 U.S. Congress, House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, Subcommittee on Education, T raining, Employment and
Housing and House Committee on Small Business, Subcommittee on Government Procurement, SBA Program s to
Assist Veterans in Readjusting to Civilian Life, joint hearing, 104th Cong., 2nd sess., July 31, 1996, SBC Serial No. 104 -
91 and VAC Serial No. 104-28, pp. 4-15. For additional information concerning the SBA’s administrative decisions on
groups seeking to be presumed socially disadvantaged, see George R. LaNo ue and John C. Sullivan, “ Presumptions for
Preferences: T he Small Business Administration’s Decisions on Groups Entitled to Affirmative Action,” Journal of
Policy History, vol. 6, no. 4 (1994), at https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-policy-history/article/
presumptions-for-preferences-the-small-business-administrations-decisions-on-groups-entitled-to-affirmative-action/
99AFFC9D3FF1C1F1D520D9D3600B1E32 (hereinafter LaNoue and Sullivan, “ Presumptions for Preferences: T he
SBA’s Decisions on Groups Entitled t o Affirmative Action”).
48 LaNoue and Sullivan, “Presumptions for Preferences: T he SBA’s Decisions on Groups Entitled to Affirmative
Action,” pp. 454, 455.
49 U.S. Congress, House Committee on Small Business, The Implementation of P.L. 106-50, the Veterans
Entrepreneurship and Sm all Business Developm ent Act of 1999 , hearing, 106th Cong., 2nd sess., March 14, 2000, Serial
No. 106-46 (Washington, DC: GPO, 2000), pp. 7, 8, 27, 47; and Paul R. Camacho, “ Phase IV, Final Report: T he Status
and Needs of Small Businesses Owned and Controlled by Disabled Veterans,” William Joiner Center for the Study of
War and Social Consequences, University of Massachusetts at Boston, November 10, 2000 , at
https://scholarworks.umb.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=joinercenter_pubs.
50 U.S. Congress, House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, 1998 National Convention of the Disabled American
Veterans, committee print, prepared by communication from the Executive Secretary of the Disabled American
Veterans, 105th Cong., 2nd sess., December 18, 1999, H.Doc. 105 -353 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1999), p. 129.
Congressional Research Service

12

Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Procurement Program

SDVOSBs as social y and economical y disadvantaged (making them eligible to participate in the
8(a) program).51
Citing the task force’s recommendations and hearing testimony provided by SDVOSB advocates,
the sponsors of H.R. 1568, the Veterans Entrepreneurship and Smal Business Development Act
of 1999, included a provision establishing a government-wide SDVOSB procurement goal of not
less than 5% of the total value of al prime contract and subcontract awards for each fiscal year.
The House Committee on Smal Business reported the bil on June 29, 1999, and the House
passed the bil by voice vote that same day.
During congressional deliberations, the lack of data collected on veteran procurement made it
difficult to determine an appropriate procurement threshold for SDVOSBs. The House bil started
with a not less than 5% procurement goal primarily because that was the goal provided for
WOSBs.52 The bil ’s sponsors argued on the House floor that the 5% goal for SDVOSBs would
ensure that veterans, especial y those fighting for their country, have equal opportunity to
government contracts.53
The Senate Committee on Smal Business reported its version of the bil on August 4, 1999. It
included a government-wide SDVOSB procurement goal of not less than 3% of the total value of
al prime contract and subcontract awards for each fiscal year “as an incentive to Federal agencies
to undertake a major effort to make their procurement activities more accessible to veterans who
sacrificed their health and limbs for our Nation.”54 The following day, the Senate Committee on
Smal Business’s version of the bil was agreed to by unanimous consent in the Senate and was
agreed to in the House without objection that same day. President Bil Clinton signed the bil into
law (P.L. 106-50, the Veterans Entrepreneurship and Smal Business Development Act of 1999)
on August 17, 1999.
After the SDVOSB 3% government-wide procurement goal’s authorization, SDVOSB advocates
directed their attention to providing federal agencies authority to award sole source contracts to
and set aside contracts for SDVOSBs.
SDVOSBs’ Sole Source and Set-Aside Authority
SDVOSB advocates, as wel as the George W. Bush Administration, supported efforts to provide
federal agencies authority to award sole source contracts to and set aside contracts for SDVOSBs
to help them meet the 3% goal. As one Bush Administration official testified before Congress,

51 U.S. Congress, House Committee on Small Business, H.R. 1568: The Veterans Entrepreneurship and Small Business
Developm ent Act of 1999, hearing, 106th Cong., 1st sess., June 23, 1999, Serial No. 106-20 (Washington, DC: GPO,
1999), pp. 167-187; and Rep. James T alent, “ Veterans Entrepreneurship and Small Business Development Act of
1999,” House floor debate, Congressional Record, vol. 145, part 94 (June 29, 1999), p. H5022.
52 U.S. Congress, House Committee on Small Business, H.R. 1568: The Veterans Entrepreneurship and Small Business
Developm ent Act of 1999, 106th Cong., 1st sess., June 23, 1999, Serial No. 106-20 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1999), pp.
3, 10; U.S. Congress, House Committee on Small Business, Veterans Entrepreneurship and Sm all Business
Developm ent Act of 1999, report to accompany H.R. 1568, 106th Cong., 1st sess., June 29, 1999, H.Rept. 106-206, Part
1 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1999), pp. 14, 15; and U.S. Congress, Sen ate Committee on Small Business, Veterans
Entrepreneurship and Sm all Business Developm ent Act of 1999 , report to accompany H.R. 1568, 106th Cong., 1st sess.,
August 9, 1999, S.Rept. 106-136 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1999), pp. 3, 10.
53 Rep. James T alent, “Veterans Entrepreneurship and Small Business Development Act of 1999,” House floor debate,
Congressional Record, vol. 145, part 94 (June 29, 1999), p. H5022.
54 U.S. Congress, Senate Committee on Small Business, Veterans Entrepreneurship and Small Business Development
Act of 1999, report to accompany H.R. 1568, 106th Cong., 1st sess., August 4, 1999, S.Rept. 106-136 (Washington, DC:
GPO, 1999), p. 2.
Congressional Research Service

13

link to page 18 link to page 18 Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Procurement Program

“the Federal government has done an abysmal job of providing federal contracting opportunities
for our veterans” (see Table 2).55
During the 108th Congress, Representative Rick Renzi introduced H.R. 1460, the Veterans
Entrepreneurship and Benefits Improvement Act of 2003. The bil , among other provisions,
would have authorized federal agencies to set aside contracts for and award sole source contracts
(capped at $5 mil ion for manufacturing contracts and $3 mil ion for other contracts, including
any options) to SDVOSBs as a means to help federal agencies meet the 3% goal. The bil , as
amended, was reported by the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs on June 5, 2003, and passed
by the House unanimously on June 24, 2003.
In the meantime, H.R. 2297, the Veterans Benefits Act of 2003, introduced in the House on June
2, 2003, was reported by the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs on July 15, 2003, and passed
by the House unanimously on July 15, 2003. The House bil did not mention SDVOSB sole
source or set-aside authority. During Senate consideration, the bil was amended to include the
legislative language concerning SDVOSBs’ set-aside and sole source authority in H.R. 1460 (as
agreed to in the Senate on November 11, 2003). The House agreed to the Senate amendment
(which included SDVOSB set-aside and sole source authority) by voice vote on November 20,
2003. President George W. Bush signed the bil into law (P.L. 108-183, the Veterans Benefits Act
of 2003) on December 16, 2003. The act created what is currently known as the SDVOSB
Procurement Program.
SDVOSB Contracting Data
As shown in Table 2, the dollar amount of contracts awarded to SDVOSBs has general y
increased from year-to-year, and the 3% government-wide SDVOSB procurement goal was met
for the first time in FY2012 and in each fiscal year since then. The percentage of federal smal
business eligible contract dollars awarded to SDVOSBs, including the required double counting
of specific types of contracts since FY2019, is used to determine if the goal has been achieved
(see the third column for FY2019 and FY2020 and the fourth column for previous years).

55 U.S. Congress, House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, H.R. 1460, the Veterans Entrepreneurship Act of 2003; H.R.
1712, the Veterans Federal Procurem ent Opportunity Act of 2003; and H.R. 1716, the Veterans Earn and Learn Act ,
hearing, 108th Cong., 1st sess., April 30, 2003, Serial No. 108-10 (Washington, DC: GPO, 2003), pp. 33, 34; and U.S.
Congress, House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, Veterans Entrepreneurship and Benefits Improvement Act of 2003 ,
report to accompany H.R. 1460, 108th Cong., 1st sess., June 5, 2003, H.Rept. 108-142, part 1 (Washington, DC: GPO,
2003), p. 6.
Congressional Research Service

14

Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Procurement Program

Table 2. Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) Contract
Awards, Amount and Percentage of Small Business Eligible Contracts, FY2001-
FY2020
($ in bil ions)
% of Small
Business
Eligible
Federal
Contracts
(including
% of Small
required
Business
double
Eligible
counting, see
Federal
Fiscal Year
Amount
Table notes)
Contracts
2020
$23.707
4.28%
4.23%
2019
$21.782
4.39%
4.34%
2018
$20.618
NA
4.27%
2017
$17.938
NA
4.05%
2016
$16.337
NA
3.98%
2015
$13.832
NA
3.93%
2014
$13.495
NA
3.68%
2013
$12.023
NA
3.38%
2012
$12.256
NA
3.03%
2011
$11.206
NA
2.65%
2010
$10.793
NA
2.50%
2009
$8.751
NA
1.98%
2008
$6.267
NA
1.39%
2007
$3.816
NA
1.01%
2006
$2.960
NA
0.87%
2005
$1.940
NA
0.61%
2004
$1.200
NA
0.38%
2003
$0.549
NA
0.20%
2002
$0.298
NA
0.13%
2001
$0.554
NA
0.25%
Sources: U.S. Congress, House Committee on Smal Business, Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform and
Oversight, SBA’s Procurement Assistance Programs, hearing, 109th Cong., 2nd sess., March 30, 2006, serial no. 109-
45 (Washington, DC: GPO, 2006), p. 31 [FY2001-FY2004]; U.S. General Services Administration (GSA),
“Sam.Gov Data Bank, Static: Smal Business Goaling Report [FY2005-FY2020],” at https://sam.gov/reports/
awards/static; GSA, “Federal Procurement Data System—Next Generation,” accessed on August 14, 2020
(WOSB and economical y disadvantaged WOSB [EDWOSB] set-aside and sole source awards, FY2011-FY2019);
and data generated using GSA, “Sam.Gov Data Bank, Ad Hoc report,” August 2, 2021 [2020], at https://sam.gov/
reports/awards/adhoc.
Notes: The smal business eligible baseline excludes certain contracts that the U.S. Smal Business
Administration (SBA) has determined do not realistical y reflect the potential for smal business participation in
federal procurement (such as those awarded to mandatory and directed sources), contracts funded
predominately from agency-generated sources (i.e., nonappropriated funds), contracts not covered by the
Congressional Research Service

15

link to page 20 Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Procurement Program

Federal Acquisition Regulations System, acquisitions on behalf of foreign governments, and contracts not
reported in the GSA’s Federal Procurement Data System—Next Generation (such as government procurement
card purchases and contracts valued less than $10,000). About 15%-18% of al federal contracts are excluded in
any given fiscal year.
In FY2019 and FY2020, in accordance with federal law, the SBA provided double credit, for scorecard purposes
only, for prime contracts awarded in disaster areas that are awarded as a local set-aside and a smal business or
other socioeconomic set-aside when the vendor state is the same as the place of performance (see 15 U.S.C.
§644(f)) and for prime contracts awarded to businesses in Puerto Rico and covered territories dated on or after
August 13, 2018, and only for awards that do not already qualify for double credit under 15 U.S.C. §6 44(f) (see
15 U.S.C. §644(x)(1)). With double credits, SDVOSBs received $22.0 bil ion in smal business eligible contracts in
FY2019 and $23.9 bil ion in FY2020. See SBA, “Smal Business Procurement Scorecard Overview,” at
https://www.sba.gov/document/support-smal -business-procurement-scorecard-overview.
For comparative purposes, Figure 1 shows the percentage of smal business eligible federal
contracts awarded to smal businesses general y, SDBs, WOSBs, SDVOSBs, and HUBZone
smal businesses from FY2005 through FY2020.
As detailed in the figure’s notes, the smal business eligible baseline excludes certain contracts
that the SBA has determined do not realistical y reflect the potential for smal business
participation in federal procurement. About 15%-18% of al federal contracts are excluded in any
given fiscal year.
The federal government has had difficulty meeting the WOSB and HUBZone smal business
procurement goals. The 5% WOSB procurement goal was achieved in 2 of the 16 fiscal years
(FY2015 and FY2019) reported in the figure. The 3% HUBZone procurement goal was not
achieved in any of the 16 fiscal years.
In contrast, the 23% smal business procurement goal was achieved in 9 of the 16 fiscal years
reported in the figure (FY2005 and FY2013-FY2020), including the past 8 fiscal years. The 5%
SDB procurement goal was achieved in each of the 16 fiscal years. The 3% SDVOSB
procurement goal was achieved in 9 of the 16 fiscal years (FY2012-FY2020), including the last 9
fiscal years.
Congressional Research Service

16

link to page 18 link to page 20

Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Procurement Program

Figure 1. Small Business Contracting, Performance, by Type of Small Business,
FY2005-FY2020
(percentage of smal business eligible federal contracts)

Sources: U.S. General Services Administration (GSA), “Sam.Gov Data Bank, Static: Smal Business Goaling
Report [FY2005-FY2020],” at https://sam.gov/reports/awards/static; and U.S. Smal Business Administration
(SBA), “Government-Wide Performance: FY2020 Smal Business Procurement Scorecard,” data as of April 15,
2021, at https://www.sba.gov/document/support-smal -business-procurement-scorecard-overview.
Notes: The smal business eligible baseline excludes certain contracts that the SBA has determined do not
realistical y reflect the potential for smal business participation in federal procurement (such as those awarded
to mandatory and directed sources), contracts funded predominately from agen cy-generated sources (i.e.,
nonappropriated funds), contracts not covered by the Federal Acquisition Regulations System, acquisitions on
behalf of foreign governments, and contracts not reported in the GSA’s Federal Procurement Data System—
Next Generation (such as government procurement card purchases and contracts valued less than $10,000).
About 15%-18% of al federal contracts are excluded in any given fiscal year.
SDVOSB Set-Aside and Sole Source Contract Authority Use
The procurement figures provided in Table 2 and Figure 1 encompass al SDVOSB federal
contracts, including contracts awarded through an open competition with no smal business-
related preferences, through another smal business preference program (8(a), WOSB, HUBZone,
etc.), through an SDVOSB sole source award, and through an SDVOSB set-aside award. As a
result, it is useful to know the extent to which the SDVOSB Procurement Program (the provision
of SDVOSB set-aside and sole source awards) is being used by federal procurement officers.
In FY2020, about 37.0% of al SDVOSB contracts were awarded with an SDVOSB preference
(1.0% by an SDVOSB sole source award and 36.0% by an SDVOSB set-aside award), 30.6%
Congressional Research Service

17

Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Procurement Program

were awarded through another smal business preference program, and 32.4% were awarded in
open competition.56
For comparative purposes, in FY2020
 about 15.7% of al HUBZone contracts were awarded with an HUBZone
preference (0.5% by an HUBZone sole source award, 14.8% by an HUBZone
set-aside award, and 0.4% with a price evaluation preference), 55.0% were
awarded through another smal business preference program, and 29.3% were
awarded in open competition;57
 about 4.6% of al WOSB contracts were awarded with a WOSB preference (0.4%
by a WOSB sole source award and 4.2% by a WOSB set-aside award), 61.2%
were awarded through another smal business preference program, and 34.2%
were awarded in open competition;58 and
 about 60.1% of al 8(a) contracts were awarded with an 8(a) preference (32.7%
by an 8(a) sole source award and 27.4% by an 8(a) set-aside award), 33.4% were
awarded through another smal business preference program, and 6.5% were
awarded in open competition.59
VA’s VOSB and SDVOSB Procurement Goals and
Certification Requirements
As the SDVOSB program got underway, some Members were concerned that al owing
SDVOSBs to self-certify their status might not be a sufficient safeguard against fraud. The only
process in place to detect fraud in the SDVOSB program at that time involved a formal bid
protest process at the SBA, where interested parties to a contract award could protest if they felt a
firm misrepresented its smal business size or SDVOSB eligibility in its bid submission.
Due to VA’s relatively low VOSB and SDVOSB procurement levels (4.5% for VOSBs and 2.3%
for SDVOSBs in FY2005) and concerned that SDVOSBs were not being verified by VA,
Representative John Boozman introduced H.R. 3082, the Veteran-Owned Smal Business
Promotion Act of 2005 (later retitled the Veterans Smal Business and Memorial Affairs Act of
2006), on June 28, 2005.60 The bil would have required VA to award at least 9.0% of the total
value of its prime and subcontract awards to VOSBs, with at least one-third of that amount
awarded to SDVOSBs. Among other provisions, VA would have been required to establish a
VOSB database, verify that the business owner is a veteran or a service-disabled veteran, and,
when providing preferences, provide SDVOSBs first priority and VOSBs second priority. The bil
would have also al owed surviving spouses who inherit ownership rights in the smal business to
be treated as if they were that veteran. The Committee on Veterans’ Affairs reported the bil , as
amended and retitled, on July 24, 2006, and the House agreed to the bil by voice vote that same
day.

56 Data generated using GSA, “Sam.Gov data bank,” August 3, 2021, at https://sam.gov/reports/awards/adhoc.
57 Data generated using GSA, “Sam.Gov data bank,” August 3, 2021, at https://sam.gov/reports/awards/adhoc.
58 Data generated using GSA, “Sam.Gov data bank,” August 3, 2021, at https://sam.gov/reports/awards/adhoc.
59 Data generated using GSA, “Sam.Gov data bank,” August 3, 2021, at https://sam.gov/reports/awards/adhoc.
60 U.S. Congress, House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, Veterans Small Business and Memorial Affairs Act of 2006,
report to accompany H.R. 3082, 109th Cong., 2nd sess., July 24, 2006, H.Rept. 109-592 (Washingt on, DC: GPO, 2006),
pp. 15-17.
Congressional Research Service

18

Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Procurement Program

The amended bil would have required VA’s Secretary to establish procurement goals for VOSBs
and SDVOSBs each fiscal year. The SDVOSB goal had to be not less than the government-wide
SDVOSB procurement goal for that fiscal year (currently 3%). Also, when providing preferences,
VA would be required to provide SDVOSBs first priority and VOSBs second priority. VA would
also be required to maintain a database of VOSBs and, at a minimum, verify that the owner was a
veteran or service-disabled veteran. Listing in this database would be required as a condition for
participating in the VA procurement program. The bil would have al owed surviving spouses who
inherit ownership rights in the smal business to be treated as if they were that veteran until the
date on which the surviving spouse remarries, relinquishes an ownership interest in the smal
business, or the date that is 10 years after the veteran’s death.
In 2006, these provisions (with an additional requirement that the surviving spouse was married
to a veteran with a 100% disability rating or who died as a result of a service-connected
disability) were added by the House on December 8, 2006, to S. 3421, an act to authorize major
medical facility projects and major medical facility leases for the Department of Veterans Affairs
for Fiscal Years 2006 and 2007, and for other purposes (retitled the Veterans Benefits, Health
Care, and Information Technology Act of 2006 by House amendment). The Senate agreed to the
House amendments by unanimous consent the following day and President George W. Bush
signed the bil into law on December 22, 2006 (P.L. 109-461, the Veterans Benefits, Health Care,
and Information Technology Act of 2006).
In FY2021, VA’s procurement goals are at least 17.0% for VOSBs and at least 15.0% for
SDVOSBs. In FY2020, VA awarded 22.0% of its contracts to VOSBs and 22.5% to SDVOSBs
(15.3% using either a VOSB or SDVOSB set-aside).61
VA-SBA Coordination Issues
For many years, VA and the SBA had similar, but not identical, regulations concerning SDVOSB
eligibility. As examples, VA’s regulations required the veteran to be the businesses’ highest
compensated employee, SBA’s regulations did not; and by statute, surviving spouses of deceased
veterans may be eligible for SDVOSB verification by VA under specified circumstances, but they
were not eligible under SBA’s regulations. Because of these and other differences, some
companies qualified as an SDVOSB under VA standards but not under SBA standards, and vice
versa.62
To address this issue, P.L. 114-328, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017,
required the use of SBA regulations to determine VOSB and SDVOSB ownership and control,

61 U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), FY 2022 Budget Submission: Supplemental Information and Appendices,
Volum e 1 of 4, May 2021, p. 25, at https://www.va.gov/budget/docs/summary/
fy2022VAbudgetVolumeIsupplementalInformationAndAppendices.pdf .
62 A veteran “means a person who served in the active military, naval, air, or space service, and who was discha rged or
released therefrom under conditions other than dishonorable.” See 38 U.S.C. §101(2).
A service-disabled veteran (see 13 C.F.R. §125.11) is
a veteran who possesses either a valid disability rating letter issued by the Department of Veterans
Affairs, establishing a service-connected rating between 0 and 100 percent, or a valid disability
determination from the Department of Defense or is registered in the Beneficiary Identification and
Records Locator Subsystem maintained by Department of Veterans Af fairs’ Veterans Benefits
Administration as a service-disabled veteran. Reservists or members of the National Guard disabled
from a disease or injury incurred or aggravated in line of duty or while in training status also
qualify.
Also, the business must be small, as defined in §3(q) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. §632(q)) and the SBA’s
implementing regulations (13 C.F.R. §125).
Congressional Research Service

19

link to page 4 Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Procurement Program

al owed VA to continue to determine whether individuals are veterans or service-disabled
veterans, and directed that chal enges to a VOSB’s or SDVOSB’s status based on ownership or
control were to be decided by the SBA’s Office of Hearings and Appeals’ administrative judges.
The law applied VA’s statutory language al owing surviving spouses under specified
circumstances to be eligible for SDVOSB status to al SDVOSBs, eliminating that discrepancy.
In addition, P.L. 116-283 (see “Introduction”) requires VA to transfer, by January 1, 2023, the
maintenance of VA’s database of SDVOSBs interested in participating in VA’s smal business
contracting program to the SBA, provide compensation to the SBA for doing so, and abolish VA’s
Center for Verification and Evaluation and transfer its function to the SBA. VA is to continue to
determine whether an individual qualifies as a veteran or service-disabled veteran.
The SBA is also required to establish a government-wide SDVOSB certification and periodic
recertification process by January 1, 2023. This requirement was designed to address concerns
about the potential for fraud in the SDVOSB program. For example, in 2009, the Government
Accountability Office (GAO) concluded that the SBA’s reliance on bid protests to investigate
al egations of SDVOSB program fraud “has al owed ineligible firms to receive mil ions of dollars
in federal contracts,” and the only efforts to put fraud prevention controls in place prior to
contract bidding are those at VA (and those controls apply only to VA contracts).63
The GAO argued that
a well-designed fraud-prevention system should consist of three crucial elements: (1) up -
front preventive controls, (2) detection and monitoring, and (3) investigations and
prosecutions. For the SDVOSB program this would mean (1) front -end controls over
program eligibility prior to contract award, (2) fraud detection and monitoring of firms
already receiving SDVOSB contracts, and (3) the aggressive pursuit and prosecution of
individuals committing fraud to include suspension and debarment, or requirement to
terminate the contract.64
In response to the GAO’s findings, the SBA argued that it was
only authorized to perform eligibility reviews in a protest situation, including where the
SBA itself has reason to believe that a firm has misrepresented its SDVOSB status. In this
area, the SBA believes that it has been diligent and responsible as all protest determinations
have been provided to the appropriate contracting officer in a timely manner.65
Later, the SBA indicated that “our self-certification program for the service-disabled community
for the rest of the Federal government has been effective in self-policing itself” and expanding the
SBA’s role to certify al SDVOSBs would have “significant al ocations questions.”66

63 U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Program: Case
Studies Show Fraud and Abuse Allowed Ineligible Firms to Obtain Millions of Dollars in Contracts, GAO-10-108,
October 23, 2009, p. 21, at https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-10-108 (hereinafter GAO, Service-Disabled Veteran-
Owned Small Business Program).
64 GAO, Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Program , p. 16.
65 GAO, Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Program , pp. 27, 28.
66 U.S. Congress, House Committee on Small Business, Subcommittee on Contract ing and Workforce, and House
Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, Consistently Inconsistent: Challenges
for Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Sm all Businesses, joint hearing, 113th Cong., 1st sess., March 19, 2013, Doc. No.
113-006 (Washington, DC: GPO, 2013), pp. 25, 32.
Congressional Research Service

20

link to page 24 Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Procurement Program

Legislation of Interest
Several bil s have been introduced during the 117th Congress that would affect the SDVOSB
program:
 H.R. 3065, the Expanding Contracting Opportunities for Smal Businesses Act of
2021, would increase the sole source limit for WOSBs, SDBs, HUBZone smal
businesses, and SDVOSBs to $10 mil ion for manufacturing contracts and $8
mil ion for other contracts, including any options.
 S.Amdt. 2443 to S.Amdt. 2137 to H.R. 3684, the Infrastructure Investment and
Jobs Act, would have increased the sole source limit for WOSBs, SDBs,
HUBZone smal businesses, and SDVOSBs to $10 mil ion for manufacturing
contracts and $8 mil ion for other contracts, including any options. The
amendment would have also increased the government-wide procurement goal
for smal businesses general y to 25%; for HUBZone smal businesses to 4%; for
SDBs to 11% in FY2022, 12% in FY2023, 13% in FY2024, and 15% in FY2025
and each fiscal year thereafter; for WOSBs to 6% for each of FY2022 and
FY2023 and 7% in FY2024 and each fiscal year thereafter; and for SDVOSBs to
5%.
Concluding Observations
Congressional oversight of the SBA’s implementation of the SDVOSB certification process,
which Congress imposed to deter fraud and promote uniformity of treatment among SDVOSBs,
is likely to be a congressional priority for the next several years. For example, Members may
consider the following questions:
 Wil the SBA’s SDVOSB certification process, which is likely to include an
online application portal, be user-friendly and free of technical difficulties, such
as those experienced by the SBA’s Paycheck Protection Program and Shuttered
Venue Operators Grant program’s online application portals?67
 Wil the SDVOSB documentation requirements be onerous?
 Wil the documentation requirements prove effective in deterring fraud?
 Wil the SDVOSB certification decision be made in a timely manner?
 Wil the SBA have sufficient administrative capacity to manage its increased
responsibilities to ensure an orderly transition from VA to the SBA?
Congress may also continue monitoring federal agency performance in meeting the SDVOSB 3%
government-wide procurement goal. As mentioned, the federal government has met the SDVOSB
3% procurement goal every year since FY2012, leading some SDVOSB advocates to seek a
higher threshold (see S.Amdt. 2443 in “Legislation of Interest”). Advocates of doing so argue that
increasing the SDVOSB procurement goal could lead to more contracting with SDVOSBs and
smal businesses general y. Others worry that it could redistribute available smal business
contract dollars from other types of smal businesses to SDVOSBs and result in no overal
increase in smal business contracting. Stil others worry that increasing other smal business

67 For additional information and analysis of the Paycheck Protection Program and Shuttered Venue Operators Grant
program, see CRS Report R46284, COVID-19 Relief Assistance to Sm all Businesses: Issues and Policy Options, by
Robert Jay Dilger, Bruce R. Lindsay, and Sean Lowry ; and CRS Report R46689, SBA Shuttered Venue Operators
Grant Program (SVOG), by Robert Jay Dilger and Sean Lowry.
Congressional Research Service

21

Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Procurement Program

procurement goals, such as the proposed significant increase for SDBs (see the aforementioned
S.Amdt. 2443), could adversely affect the volume of SDVOSB contracts.
Congress could also examine the pros and cons of legislation concerning sole source contract
limits, including proposals to increase the limits, exclude options in the determination of those
limits, or both.

Congressional Research Service

22

Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Procurement Program

Author Information

Robert Jay Dilger

Senior Specialist in American National Government

Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan
shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and
under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should n ot be relied upon for purposes other
than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in
connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not
subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in
its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or
material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to
copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.

Congressional Research Service
R46906 · VERSION 2 · NEW
23