link to page 1  link to page 1 


 
 
February 5, 2021
U.S. Global Health Assistance: FY2017-FY2021 Funding
Background 
international HIV/AIDS research. Congress does not 
Congress has prioritized global health with foreign aid 
earmark funds for these activities, however, and NIH has 
funding rising over the past 20 years. The steepest increase 
not reported related grant amounts since FY2017. 
occurred during the George W. Bush Administration 
State-Foreign Operations (SFOPS) Appropriations 
(Figure 1), following the establishment of the President’s 
include funds for the coordination of PEPFAR by the State 
Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) and the 
President’s Malaria Initiative. During the Obama 
Department and USAID global health programs. From 
FY2020 to FY2021, appropriations remained mostly level, 
Administration, appropriations continued to rise, though at 
except for a near doubling of funds for global public health 
a slower pace and with some funding dips. Global health 
protection, which includes support for the collection and 
appropriations resumed a steady increase during the Trump 
analysis of data on unknown viruses and pathogens. In 
Administration, despite requests from that administration to 
FY2021, Congress also increased funding for tuberculosis 
reduce global health spending. The emergence of the novel 
(TB) and maternal and child health programs.  
SARS-CoV-2, which causes Coronavirus Disease 2019 
(COVID-19), likely prompted funding increases for global 
Labor-HHS Appropriations include funds for CDC global 
health security efforts in FY2021. Several bills in the 116th 
health programs, which remained at FY2020 levels in 
Congress were aimed at bolstering global health security. 
FY2021, except for new funding for TB programs and a 
The 117th Congress may continue to focus on pandemic 
near doubling for global health protection. Sufficient 
control, as the COVID-19 pandemic continues and SARS-
resources are also available through the appropriations for 
CoV-2 variants emerge.    
international HIV/AIDS research conducted by NIH.  
Figure 1.U.S. Global Health Appropriations, by 
Figure 2. Global Health Appropriations: 
Administration: FY2001-FY2021 
FY2017-FY2021 
(current 2020 U.S. $ bil ions) 
(current U.S. $ millions) 
 
Source: Appropriations legislation and engagement with CDC and 
USAID congressional relations personnel. 
Notes: Excludes emergency appropriations, rescissions, and other 
funds that may be used to improve health worldwide, such as 
international HIV/AIDS research conducted by the National Institutes 
of Health (NIH).  
Global Health Appropriations 
Most U.S. global health funding is provided to the 
Department of State to coordinate PEPFAR activities, and 
to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
(CDC) and the U.S. Agency for International Development 
(USAID) for a range of global health activities (Figure 2). 
Congress also makes funds available for other global health 
activities, such as the National Institutes of Health (NIH) 
 
Sources: Appropriations legislation and engagement with CDC and 
Office of AIDS Research (OAR), which supports 
USAID congressional relations personnel.  
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
U.S. Global Health Assistance: FY2017-FY2021 Funding 
Note: Excludes emergency appropriations and rescissions. 
attempt to withdraw the United States from WHO raised 
Acronyms: Maternal and Child Health (MCH), Vulnerable Children 
questions about congressional authority to inform the 
(VC), Family Planning and Reproductive Health (FP/RH), and 
withdrawal process. Some Members in the 116th Congress 
Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs). 
introduced legislation in support of or opposition to the 
withdrawal decision.  
Key Global Health Policy Issues  
The Biden Administration has already executed major 
Pandemic Preparedness and Response. Global disease 
executive actions on global health policy, including  
outbreaks are occurring at greater frequency and are 
expanding in their scale and impact. The cost of epidemics 
  revoking the Mexico City Policy;  
and pandemics is also rising. The Global Preparedness 
  halting U.S. withdrawal from WHO;  
Monitoring Board estimated that a pandemic akin to the 
scale and virulence of the 1918 influenza pandemic could 
  establishing within the Office of the President a 
cost the global economy $3 trillion in Gross Domestic 
COVID-19 Response Coordinator;  
Product (GDP) and cause 50-80 million deaths. During the 
 
Obama Administration, the United States played a leading 
establishing a National Security Council (NSC) 
role in the development and implementation of the Global 
Directorate on Global Health Security and Biodefense; 
Health Security Agenda (GHSA), a multilateral effort to 
and 
improve global pandemic preparedness and response. The 
  directing the Assistant to the President for National 
Obama Administration hosted a summit on the GHSA; 
Security Affairs (APNSA) to complete a review of and 
committed to spend more than $1 billion in 30 countries on 
recommend actions to the President on emerging 
related efforts in FY2015-FY2019; issued an executive 
domestic and global biological risks and national 
order that outlined the role each agency and department 
biopreparedness policies.  
would play in implementing GHSA; and directed the NSC 
to coordinate related work. The Trump Administration 
Mexico City Policy. In 1984, the Reagan Administration 
made public statements in support of the GHSA but did not 
established the Mexico City Policy, which restricts U.S. 
make specific commitments toward sustaining support for 
assistance to foreign NGOs engaged in voluntary abortion 
the initiative, and did not maintain the GHSA coordinating 
activities, even if such activities are conducted with non-
mechanism. In January 2021, the Biden Administration 
U.S. funds. Whereas the policy applied only to family 
reestablished the coordinating mechanism and created a 
planning and reproductive health programs under the 
new senior-level position to coordinate domestic and 
George W. Bush Administration, the Trump Administration 
international COVID-19 activities.  
reinstated the policy in 2017, following its reversal during 
the Obama Administration, and applied it to all global 
In the 116th Congress, Members introduced a range of bills 
health programs under a new policy called Protecting Life 
aimed at improving global pandemic preparedness, 
in Global Health Assistance (PLGHA). On January 28, 
including those that called for reestablishing the GHSA 
2021, the Biden Administration issued a memorandum 
coordinating mechanism. Others broadened the focus of the 
revoking PLGHA. The memo also directed the Secretary of 
efforts to include the integration of environmental 
State to resume funding to the United Nations Population 
preservation and anti-wildlife trafficking efforts into global 
Fund (UNFPA) and to withdraw co-sponsorship and 
pandemic preparedness and control. Given the near 
signature from the Geneva Consensus Declaration (which 
doubling of funding for pandemic preparedness and global 
was signed by the Trump Administration in October 2020 
health security efforts through both CDC and USAID, these 
and declared that there is no international right to abortion). 
issues may remain of interest to the 117th Congress.   
The Mexico City Policy remains a contentious issue, with 
Outlook 
Members having introduced legislation to permanently 
Global health has remained a strong congressional priority, 
enact or repeal the policy. 
with funding increases continuing across administrations. 
U.S. Membership in WHO. On January 20, 2021, 
The bulk of related funding is aimed at controlling the 
President Joe Biden sent a letter to United Nation (U.N.) 
spread of infectious disease, especially HIV/AIDS, TB, and 
Secretary-General Antόnio Guterres indicating that the 
malaria. Growing concerns about pandemic threats may be 
United States would remain a member of WHO. The letter 
contributing to recent increases in appropriations for related 
retracted a July 6, 2020, decision by the Trump 
programs. Emergency appropriations for U.S. international 
Administration to withdraw the United States from WHO, 
efforts to control global disease outbreaks, particularly 
effective July 6, 2021. The withdrawal determination 
Ebola and COVID-19, have outweighed regular 
followed assertions by the Trump Administration that 
appropriations for pandemic preparedness. Given ongoing 
WHO failed “to independently investigate” reports 
challenges with controlling the COVID-19 pandemic, 
conflicting with the Chinese government’s accounts of the 
Congress may consider calls for bolstering capacity to avert 
pandemic and repeated “grossly inaccurate” or 
or control disease outbreaks. Many global health experts 
“misleading” claims made by Chinese authorities about 
assert that investments in health systems, in addition to 
COVID-19. On January 21, 2021, U.S. officials announced 
infectious disease response, could help prepare the world 
a resumption of regular engagement with WHO and an end 
for the next infectious disease threat. 
to the drawdown of U.S. staff seconded to WHO. The 
White House also issued a directive that, among other 
Tiaji Salaam-Blyther, Specialist in Global Health   
things, directed the APNSA to make recommendations for 
reforming and strengthening WHO. The unprecedented 
IF11758
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
U.S. Global Health Assistance: FY2017-FY2021 Funding 
 
 
Disclaimer 
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to 
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. 
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has 
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the 
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be 
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include 
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you 
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 
 
https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF11758 · VERSION 1 · NEW