The National Institute of Standards and
December 15, 2020
Technology: An Appropriations Overview
John F. Sargent Jr.
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), a laboratory of the Department of
Specialist in Science and
Commerce, is mandated to provide technical services to facilitate the competitiveness of U.S.
Technology Policy
industry. NIST is directed to offer support to the private sector for the development of

precompetitive generic technologies and the diffusion of government-developed innovation to
users in all segments of the American economy. Laboratory research is to provide measurement,

calibration, and quality assurance techniques that underpin U.S. commerce, technological
progress, improved product reliability, manufacturing processes, and public safety.
Concerns about the adequacy of federal funding for physical science and engineering research led to efforts by successive
Presidents and Congresses to double funding for the NIST laboratory and construction accounts, together with the National
Science Foundation and the Department of Energy Office of Science. President Bush’s proposal was to do so over 10 years;
the America COMPETES Act (P.L. 110-69) set authorization levels consistent with a seven-year doubling and the America
COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010 set authorization levels consistent with an 11-year doubling. However,
appropriations did not keep pace with authorization levels or presidential requests. In addition, the appropriations
authorizations for the accounts targeted for doubling lapsed at the end of FY2013. Appropriations for the targeted NIST
accounts increased by 42.3% from FY2006 to FY2016.
Funding for NIST extramural programs directed toward increased private sector commercialization has been a topic of
congressional debate. Some Members of Congress have expressed skepticism over a “technology policy” based on providing
federal funds to industry for development of precompetitive generic technologies. This approach, coupled with pressures to
balance the federal budget, led to significant reductions in funding for NIST. The Advanced Technology Program (ATP) and
the Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP), which accounted for over 50% of the FY1995 NIST budget, were
subsequently proposed for elimination. In 2007, ATP was terminated and replaced by the Technology Innovation Program
(TIP). TIP was subsequently defunded in the FY2012 appropriations legislation. President Trump has proposed the
elimination of federal funding for the MEP program in fiscal years 2018 to 2021.
In December 2014, Congress enacted the Revitalize American Manufacturing and Innovation Act of 2014 (Title VII of
Division B of P.L. 113-235), establishing a Network for Manufacturing Innovation (also referred to as Manufacturing USA).
The explanatory statement accompanying the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016 (P.L. 114-113) directed NIST to use an
open competition to select the technological focus areas of industry-driven manufacturing institutes. Upon completion of its
first competition, NIST announced its selection of the National Institute for Innovation in Manufacturing Biopharmaceuticals
(NIIMBL). In total, 14 NNMI institutes have been sponsored by the Department of Defense (DOD, eight institutes),
Department of Energy (six institutes), and Department of Commerce (one institute). A new DOD-sponsored instituted is
being competed in FY2020. A second NIST-sponsored institute has been requested in the President’s budget.
For FY2020, Congress provided $1,034.0 billion for NIST, including $754.0 million for the Scientific and Technical
Research and Services (STRS) account, $162.0 million for the Industrial Technology Services (ITS) account, and $118.0
million for the Construction of Research Facilities (CRF) account. Within the ITS account, Congress provided $146.0 million
for the Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) program and $16.0 million for Manufacturing USA, including ongoing
support for NIST’s first institute, the National Institute for Innovation in Manufacturing Biopharmaceuticals (NIIMBL), and
support for coordination of the Manufacturing USA network.
The President is requesting $737.5 million for NIST in FY2021, a decrease of $296.5 million (28.7%) from the FY2020
enacted appropriation of $1,034.0 million. Included in the FY2021 request is $652 million for the STRS account, a decrease
of $102.0 million (13.5%); $25.3 million for the ITS account, down $136.7 million (84.4%); and $60.2 million for the NIST
CRF account for FY2020, down $57.8 million (49.0%). Within the ITS account, the request would provide no funding for the
Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) program, a reduction of $146.0 million from the FY2020 enacted level. The
FY2021 ITS request includes $25.3 million for Manufacturing USA, an increase of $9.3 million (58.1%). Of these funds,
$20.0 million would be for the award and initial funding of a second Manufacturing USA institute; and $5.3 million would be
for coordination of the Manufacturing USA network. All changes are from the FY2020 enacted levels.
Congressional Research Service

The National Institute of Standards and Technology: An Appropriations Overview

Mission
The U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC) National Institute of Standards and Technology
(NIST) is the “lead national laboratory for providing the measurements, calibrations, and quality
assurance techniques which underpin United States commerce, technological progress, improved
product reliability and manufacturing processes, and public safety.”1
By statute, NIST is “to assist private sector initiatives to capitalize on advanced technology; to
advance, through cooperative efforts among industries, universities, and government laboratories,
promising research and development projects, which can be optimized by the private sector for
commercial and industrial applications; and to promote shared risks, accelerated development,
and pooling of skills which will be necessary to strengthen America’s manufacturing industries.”2
NIST conducts leading-edge research in its seven research laboratories located in facilities in
Gaithersburg, MD, and Boulder, CO.3 NIST employs approximately 3,000 scientists, engineers,
technicians, and support personnel, and hosts about 3,500 guest researchers and associates from
academia, industry, and other government agencies, who collaborate with NIST staff and access
user facilities. Research is focused on measurement, standards, test methods, and basic
“infrastructural technologies” that enable development of advanced technologies. Infrastructural
technologies assist industry in characterizing new materials, monitoring production processes,
and ensuring the quality of new product lines. Cooperative research with industry to overcome
technical barriers to commercialization of emerging technologies is a major component of NIST’s
work.
In addition, NIST manages extramural programs such as the Hollings Manufacturing Extension
Partnership (MEP) program and the Network for Manufacturing Innovation (NMI, also referred
to as Manufacturing USA). Several other extramural programs previously conducted by NIST
have been eliminated or integrated into other NIST activities. These programs are discussed in the
next section.
History and Selected Statutory Authorities
Unlike most federal laboratories, NIST has a mission specified by statute (15 U.S.C. 271-282a),
has a separate authorization and appropriation, and is headed by a Senate-confirmed presidential
appointee (the Under Secretary of Commerce for Technology and Standards). NIST was
originally created by the NBS Organic Act of 1901 (P.L. 56-177) as the National Bureau of
Standards (NBS), at a time when the first centralized industrial labs were being established.4
Under the act, NBS was charged with working on “the solution of problems which arise in
connection with standards” and to engage in the “determination of physical constants and the
properties of materials, when such data are of great importance to scientific or manufacturing

1 §5111, Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988 (P.L. 100-418).
2 Ibid.
3 The seven laboratories are the Materials Measurement Laboratory, Physical Measurement Laboratory, Engineering
Laboratory, Information Technology Laboratory, Communications Technology Laboratory, Center for Nanoscale
Science and Technology, and Center for Neutron Research.
4 General Electric Research Laboratory, widely recognized as the first industrial research facility, was established in
1900 in Schenectady, NY.
Congressional Research Service

1

The National Institute of Standards and Technology: An Appropriations Overview

interests and are not to be obtained of sufficient accuracy elsewhere.” These objectives remain
central to NIST’s laboratory work today.
Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Improvement Act of 1987
In 1987, the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Improvement Act of 1987 (P.L. 100-107)
established the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award under the management of NBS.5 The
act directs the President or the Secretary of Commerce to “periodically make the award to
companies and other organizations which in the judgment of the President or the Secretary have
substantially benefited the economic or social well-being of the United States through
improvements in the quality of their goods or services resulting from the effective practice of
quality management, and which as a consequence are deserving of special recognition.”6
Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988
The following year, amid widespread concerns about the state of U.S. industrial competitiveness,
the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988 (P.L. 100-418) significantly expanded the
role of NIST as the “lead national laboratory for providing the measurements, calibrations, and
quality assurance techniques which underpin United States commerce, technological progress,
improved product reliability and manufacturing processes, and public safety” by “moderniz[ing]
and restructur[ing] that agency to augment its unique ability to enhance the competitiveness of
American industry.”7 The act also changed the name from NBS to the National Institute of
Standards and Technology to reflect its expanded mission. In addition to its long-standing work in
standards and metrology,8 NIST was directed to offer support to the private sector for the
development of precompetitive generic technologies and the diffusion of government-developed
innovation to users in all segments of the U.S. economy. Among its provisions, the act established
the Advanced Technology Program (ATP), and a program now known as the Hollings
Manufacturing Extension Partnership program.
Hollings Manufacturing Extension Partnership Program
The MEP is a program of regional centers that assist smaller, U.S.-based manufacturing
companies in identifying and adopting new technologies. Operating under the auspices of NIST,
centers in all 50 states and Puerto Rico provide technical and managerial assistance to firms.
Federal funding for the centers is matched by nonfederal sources.9
Advanced Technology Program
The Advanced Technology Program was designed “to serve as a focal point for cooperation
between the public and private sectors in the development of industrial technology,” according to
the report accompanying the bill, and to help solve “problems of concern to large segments of an
industry.” Placed within the National Institute of Standards and Technology in recognition of the
laboratory’s ongoing relationship with industry, ATP provided seed funding to single companies
or to industry-led consortia of universities, businesses, and/or government laboratories for

5 The program is currently managed under NIST’s Baldrige Performance Excellence Program.
6 Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Improvement Act of 1987 (P.L. 100-107).
7 §5111, P.L. 100-107.
8 Metrology is the science of measurement.
9 For additional information on the Hollings Manufacturing Extension Partnership program, see CRS Report R44308,
The Manufacturing Extension Partnership Program, by John F. Sargent Jr.
Congressional Research Service

2

The National Institute of Standards and Technology: An Appropriations Overview

development of generic (broad-based), precompetitive technologies that have many applications
across industries. Awards, based on technical and business merit, were for high-risk work past the
basic research stage but not yet ready for commercialization. Market potential was an important
consideration in project selection. Scientific and technical review generally was performed by
federal and academic experts. Business plan assessments were made by individuals from the
private sector.
America COMPETES Act/America COMPETES Reauthorization
Act of 2010
The America COMPETES Act (P.L. 110-69) and the America COMPETES Reauthorization Act
of 2010 (P.L. 111-358) authorized NIST appropriations and several programs and activities.
Technology Innovation Program
In 2007, the America COMPETES Act replaced ATP with a new program, the Technology
Innovation Program (TIP). While similar to ATP in the promotion of R&D expected to be of
broad-based economic benefit to the nation, TIP appeared to have been structured to avoid what
was seen as government funding of large firms that opponents argued did not necessarily need
federal support for research. The committee report to accompany H.R. 1868, part of which was
incorporated into P.L. 110-69, stated that TIP replaced ATP in consideration of a changing global
innovation environment focusing on small and medium-sized companies. The design of the
program also “acknowledges the important role universities play in the innovation cycle by
allowing universities to fully participate in the program.”10 Appropriations for TIP were provided
from FY2008 to FY2011; no appropriations have been provided for TIP since FY2011.
NIST Doubling Effort
The America COMPETES Act authorized appropriations for NIST accounts for FY2008-FY2010,
and the America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010 authorized appropriations for NIST
accounts for FY2011-FY2013. The authorization levels for NIST were part of a larger effort to
double funding for selected accounts—all of the National Science Foundation, the Department of
Energy Office of Science, and the NIST laboratory and construction accounts—that support
physical sciences and engineering research.11 Congress’s appropriations fell short of the
authorizations in these acts, and President Obama’s FY2017 request did not refer to the doubling
goal. President Trump has not referenced the doubling goal in his budgets through FY2021.
Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012
As part of the Public Safety Trust Fund provided for in the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job
Creation Act of 2012 (P.L. 112-96), a share of spectrum auction proceeds are to be made available
to NIST as part of a Wireless Innovation (WIN) Fund to help develop cutting-edge wireless
technologies for public safety users. WIN funds are to be used for developing leading-edge
wireless technologies for public safety users, including helping industry and public safety

10 For more information on the Technology Innovation Program, see CRS Report RS22815, The Technology Innovation
Program, by Wendy H. Schacht (available to congressional clients upon request to CRS).
11 For more information on the doubling effort, see CRS Report R41951, An Analysis of Efforts to Double Federal
Funding for Physical Sciences and Engineering Research, by John F. Sargent Jr.
Congressional Research Service

3

The National Institute of Standards and Technology: An Appropriations Overview

organizations conduct research and develop new standards, technologies, and applications to
advance public safety communications in support of the initiative’s efforts to build an
interoperable nationwide broadband network for first responders. The spectrum auction provided
NIST with approximately $285.0 million for this purpose;12 efforts began in FY2015 and are
continuing in FY2020.
Revitalize American Manufacturing and Innovation Act of 2014
In his FY2013 budget, President Obama proposed the creation of a National Network for
Manufacturing Innovation (NNMI) to help accelerate innovation by investing in industrially
relevant manufacturing technologies with broad applications, and to support manufacturing
technology commercialization by bridging the gap between the laboratory and the market.
Congress did not act on this request or a subsequent one made in President Obama’s FY2014
request. President Obama renewed the request in his FY2015 budget. In December 2014,
Congress enacted the Revitalize American Manufacturing and Innovation Act of 2014 (RAMI
Act) as Title VII of Division B of the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act,
2015 (P.L. 113-235), establishing a Network for Manufacturing Innovation (NMI), largely similar
to President Obama’s concept for the NNMI. As specified in the act, the purpose of the NMI is to
improve the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing and to increase the production of goods
manufactured predominantly within the United States; to stimulate U.S. leadership in advanced
manufacturing research, innovation, and technology; to facilitate the transition of innovative
technologies into scalable, cost-effective, and high-performing manufacturing capabilities; to
facilitate access by manufacturing enterprises to capital-intensive infrastructure, including high-
performance electronics and computing, and the supply chains that enable these technologies; to
accelerate the development of an advanced manufacturing workforce; to facilitate peer exchange
and the documentation of best practices in addressing advanced manufacturing challenges; to
leverage nonfederal sources of support to promote a stable and sustainable business model
without the need for long-term federal funding; and to create and preserve jobs.13
The act did not appropriate funds specifically for the NMI program but instead authorized NIST
to spend up to $5.0 million of its appropriated funds each year from FY2015 to FY2024 to carry
out the program. In addition, the act authorizes the Department of Energy (DOE) to transfer up to
a total of $250.0 million to NIST between FY2015 and FY2024 to carry out the program. The act
also allows existing manufacturing centers to be classified as centers for manufacturing
innovation, making them eligible to participate in the network. President Obama initiated the
establishment of several such centers prior to enactment of the RAMI Act under the general
statutory authority of several agencies, including the Department of Defense and DOE.
While no funding has been transferred from DOE to NIST as authorized by the RAMI Act, in
December 2015, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016 (P.L. 114-113) provided specific
funding, for the first time, for the establishment and coordination of institutes under the
provisions of the RAMI Act. The act provided NIST with $25.0 million for FY2016 for the
NNMI, to include funding for establishment of institutes and up to $5.0 million for coordination
activities.14 The explanatory statement accompanying the act directs NIST to “follow the

12 Department of Commerce, The Department of Commerce Budget in Brief: Fiscal Year 2018, p. 104,
http://www.osec.doc.gov/bmi/budget/FY18BIB/All508.pdf.
13 For more information on the NMI, see CRS Report R43857, The Network for Manufacturing Innovation, by John F.
Sargent Jr. For more information on the NNMI proposal, see CRS Report R42625, The Obama Administration’s
Proposal to Establish a National Network for Manufacturing Innovation, by John F. Sargent Jr.
14 The act also directs NIST to merge its Advanced Manufacturing Technology Consortia (AMTech) program into the
Congressional Research Service

4

The National Institute of Standards and Technology: An Appropriations Overview

direction of the Revitalize American Manufacturing and Innovation Act of 2014 in requiring open
competition to select the technological focus areas of industry-driven manufacturing institutes.”15
In September 2016, Commerce Secretary Penny Pritzker announced that “Manufacturing USA”
would be the new brand name for the National Network for Manufacturing Innovation. Congress
continues to use the term National Network for Manufacturing Innovation in appropriations
reports.
On December 16, 2016, NIST awarded the National Institute for Innovation in Manufacturing
Biopharmaceuticals (NIIMBL), led by the University of Delaware, “to advance U.S. leadership in
biopharmaceutical manufacturing.”16 Congress has subsequently provided funding to support
NIIMBL and to coordinate the Manufacturing USA network. Congress provided FY2020 funding
to support the establishment of a second NIST-sponsored institute.
Previous NIST Programs
In July 2013, NIST launched the Advanced Manufacturing Technology Consortia (AMTech)
program and the Manufacturing Technology Acceleration Centers (M-TAC) program.
Advanced Manufacturing Technology Consortia Program
Originally included in President Obama’s FY2013 budget request, AMTech makes planning
awards to “establish industry-led consortia to identify and prioritize research projects supporting
long-term industrial research needs.” AMTech seeks to incentivize manufacturers to share
financial and scientific resources with universities, state and local governments, and nonprofit
organizations.17 AMTech does not have a statutory authorization; the Consolidated and Further
Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013 (P.L. 113-6) provided first-year funding of $14.5 million.
In December 2015, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016 (P.L. 114-113) directed NIST to
merge the Advanced Manufacturing Technology (AMTech) Consortia program with the NNMI.18
Manufacturing Technology Acceleration Centers Program
The M-TAC program was a pilot effort under MEP that sought to address “the technical and
business challenges encountered by small and mid-sized U.S. manufacturers as they attempt to
adopt, integrate, and execute advanced product and process technologies into their operations.”19
The funded project work on all the MTAC projects has been completed and a final presentation
was made by each awardee to MEP Center directors and staff in May 2016.

NNMI.
15 Explanatory Statement, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016, Division B (Commerce, Justice, Science and Related
Agencies Appropriations Act), Congressional Record, Vol. 161, No. 184-Book II (December 17, 2015), p. H9733.
16 Advanced Manufacturing National Program Office, NIST, DOC, website, “NIST Manufacturing USA Institutes,”
https://www.nist.gov/amo/nist-manufacturing-usa-institutes.
17 NIST, “President’s FY 2013 Budget Request for NIST Targets Advanced Manufacturing, Critical Science and
Technology Programs,” press release, February 13, 2012, http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/releases/
budget_2013.cfm.
18 Explanatory Statement, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016, P.L. 114-113, Division B, p. 7.
19 Advanced Manufacturing National Program Office, NIST, DOC, website, “Explaining AMTech, M-TAC and
NNMI: New NIST Programs in Support of Advanced Manufacturing,” http://www.manufacturing.gov/docs/
Explaining_AMTech_M-TAC_NNMI.pdf.
Congressional Research Service

5

link to page 11 The National Institute of Standards and Technology: An Appropriations Overview

NIST Appropriations
Overview of NIST Appropriations Accounts
Discretionary funding for NIST is generally provided through three appropriations accounts:
 The Scientific and Technical Research and Services (STRS) account supports
NIST in-house laboratory research. The account also provided funding for the
Baldrige Performance Excellence Program through FY2011 and in some
subsequent years.
 The Industrial Technology Services (ITS) account supports NIST’s extramural
programs. In FY2018, the ITS account provides funding for the MEP and NNMI
programs. In earlier years, ITS provided funding for the Advanced Technology
Program, the Technology Innovation Program, and the AMTech program.
 The Construction of Research Facilities (CRF, also referred to in this report as
construction) account supports construction, maintenance, and repair of NIST
facilities at its facilities in Gaithersburg, MD, and Boulder, CO. From FY2008 to
FY2010, CRF provided funding for a competitive grant program that funded the
construction of research facilities at U.S. universities and research institutions.
NIST Request for FY2021 Appropriations
The following sections provide information on NIST’s FY2021 request, in aggregate and for each
of its three accounts, as well as the FY2020 enacted appropriations for each. (See Table 1.) In the
absence of passage of appropriations acts at the end of the fiscal year, on September 30, 2020,
Congress passed the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2021 and Other Extensions Act (P.L. 116-
159) that, among other things, provides funding for most federal agencies through December 12,
2020. On December 11, 2020, President Trump signed into law H.R. 8900, the Further
Continuing Appropriations Act, 2021, and Other Extensions Act, providing for continuing
funding for most federal agencies through December 18, 2020. This report will be updated to
reflect final action on NIST appropriations.
Total NIST Funding Requested for FY2021
The President is requesting $737.5 million for NIST in FY2021, a decrease of $296.5 million
(28.7%) from the FY2020 enacted appropriation of $1,034.0 million.
Scientific and Technical Research and Services
The President’s FY2021 request includes $652 million for R&D, standards coordination, and
related services in the STRS account, a decrease of $102.0 million (13.5%) from the FY2020
enacted level.20

20 CRS analysis of data from Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology, National
Institute of Standards and Technology/National Technical Information Service, Fiscal Year 2021 Budget Submission to
Congress, p. NIST-5, https://www.commerce.gov/sites/default/files/2020-02/
fy2021_nist_ntis_congressional_budget_justification.pdf.
Congressional Research Service

6

link to page 11 The National Institute of Standards and Technology: An Appropriations Overview

Industrial Technology Services
The FY2021 request would provide $25.3 million for the ITS account, down $136.7 million
(84.4%) from the FY2020 enacted level. Within the ITS account, the request would provide no
funding for the Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) program, a reduction of $146.0
million from the FY2020 enacted level; MEP centers in each state would be required to become
entirely self-supporting. In his FY2020 and FY2019 requests, President Trump proposed ending
federal funding for MEP; in his FY2018 request, the President sought $6.0 million “for an orderly
shutdown of the program.” The FY2021 request provides $25.3 million for Manufacturing USA
(also referred to as the National Network for Manufacturing Innovation or NNMI), $9.3 million
(58.1%) higher than the FY2020 enacted level of $16.0 million. Of these funds, $20.0 million
would be for the award and initial funding of a second Manufacturing USA institute; and $5.3
million would be for coordination of the Manufacturing USA network.21
Construction of Research Facilities
The President is requesting $60.2 million for the NIST CRF account for FY2020, down $57.8
million (49.0%) from the FY2020 enacted level.22
Table 1. NIST Appropriations
(budget authority, in millions of dollars)
FY2020
FY2021
FY2021
FY2021
FY2021
Budget Account
Enacted
Request
House
Senatea
Enacted
Scientific and Technical Research and
754.0
652.0
794.0
786.5

Services
Industrial Technology Services
162.0
25.3
170.0
165.5

Manufacturing Extension Partnership
146.0
0.0
153.0
149.5

Network for Manufacturing Innovation
16.0
25.3
17.0
16.0

Construction of Research Facilities
118.0
60.2
85.0
98.0

NIST, Total
1,034.0
737.5
1,049.0
1,050.0

Source: Department of Commerce, NIST, National Institute of Standards and
Technology/National Technical Information Service, Fiscal Year 2021 Budget Submission to
Congress, February 2020, https://www.commerce.gov/sites/default/files/2020-02/
fy2021_nist_ntis_congressional_budget_justification.pdf; H.R. 7617; and unnumbered Senate bill
posted on Senate Appropriations Committee website.
Note: Columns may not add to totals due to rounding.
a. This bil was not passed by the Senate, but was presented by the Senate Majority Leader as a basis for
discussions and negotiation with the House.
Funding Trends for NIST Accounts and Selected Programs
This section provides an overview of appropriations data for NIST in total and for each of its
appropriations accounts, as well as for the Manufacturing Extension Partnership and the
Advanced Technology Program (eliminated in 2007) and the Technology Innovation Program

21 Ibid., p. NIST-87.
22 Ibid., p. NIST-5.
Congressional Research Service

7

link to page 21 link to page 23 link to page 12 link to page 13

The National Institute of Standards and Technology: An Appropriations Overview

(last funded in 2011). Appendix A provides requested and enacted funding levels for NIST and
its accounts for FY2003-FY2021. Appendix B provides requested and enacted funding levels for
selected NIST programs.
Total NIST Funding
Figure 1 illustrates total requested and enacted NIST funding levels. Total appropriations for
NIST grew from $707.5 million in FY2003 to $1,198.5 million in FY2018, a compound annual
growth rate (CAGR) of 3.6%. In FY2019, appropriations fell to $985.5 million, a decrease of
$213.0 million (17.8%) over FY2018. In FY2020, appropriations grew to $1,034.0 million, an
increase of $48.5 million (4.9%) over FY2019. Appropriations exceeded requests through
FY2010; from FY2010 to FY2017, requests exceeded appropriations. From FY2018 to FY2020,
appropriations once again exceeded the request. President Trump is requesting $737.5 for
FY2021, a decrease of $296.5 million (28.7%) from the FY2020 enacted level.
Figure 1. Total NIST Appropriations
Enacted Appropriations, FY2003-FY2020; Requested Appropriations, FY2003-FY2021
(in millions of current dollars)

Sources: Department of Commerce, NIST budget documents, appropriations acts, and explanatory statements
for FY2003-FY2021.
Note: ARRA = American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.
Scientific and Technical Research and Services Account
Figure 2 illustrates requested and enacted funding levels for the NIST STRS account. This
account saw a steady rise in both request and appropriations levels through FY2016. STRS
funding requests declined from FY2016 to FY2019. For FY2020, President Trump requested
$611.7 million for STRS; Congress appropriated $754.0 million, an increase of $28.5 million
(4.1%) above the FY2019 enacted level. The President’s FY2021 request for STRS is $652.0
million, a decrease of $102.0 million (13.5%) from the FY2020 enacted level.
Congressional Research Service

8

link to page 14

The National Institute of Standards and Technology: An Appropriations Overview

Figure 2. Scientific and Technical Research and Services Account
Enacted Appropriations, FY2003-FY2020; Requested Appropriations, FY2003-FY2021
(in millions of current dollars)

Sources: Department of Commerce, NIST budget documents, appropriations acts, and explanatory statements
for FY2003-FY2021.
Note: ARRA = American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.
Construction of Research Facilities Account
Figure 3 illustrates requested and enacted funding levels for the NIST CRF account. Construction
account funding has fluctuated. CRF funding jumped from $72.5 million in FY2005 to $173.7
million in FY2006, fell to $58.7 million in FY2007, rose to $160.5 million in FY2008, and then
rose to $532.0 million in FY2009 (of which $172.0 million was provided for in regular
appropriations and $360 million provided under ARRA).23 Funding fell from FY2010 to FY2012,
dropping to $55.4 million, then it remained relatively flat through FY2015 (ranging from $50
million to $56 million per year). In FY2016, CRF appropriations jumped to $119.0 million; $60.0
million of the increase was designated for beginning “the design and renovation of [NIST’s]
outdated and unsafe radiation physics infrastructure.” In FY2017, CRF appropriations were
$109.0 million, of which $60.0 million was designated for design and renovation of NIST’s
radiation physics infrastructure.24 In FY2018, CRF appropriations jumped to $319.0 million,
$210.0 million (192.7%) above the FY2017 level. In FY2019, CRS appropriations fell to $106.0
million, a decrease of $213.0 million (66.8%), then rose to $118 million in FY2020. The
President is requesting $60.2 million for the NIST CRF account for FY2021, down $57.8 million
(49.0%) from the FY2020 enacted level.
In FY2008, FY2009, and FY2010, the CRF account provided funding for a competitive
construction grant program that funded the construction of research facilities at U.S. universities
and research institutions. Appropriations for CRF have also included funding for congressionally

23 Of the $360 million that ARRA provided this account in FY2009, $180 million was designated for the competitive
construction grant program.
24 P.L. 115-31.
Congressional Research Service

9

link to page 14

The National Institute of Standards and Technology: An Appropriations Overview

designated projects in some years. Figure 4 illustrates the funding levels for the NIST CRF
account excluding congressionally directed projects and the competitive grant program.
Figure 3. Construction of Research Facilities Account
Enacted Appropriations, FY2003-FY2020; Requested Appropriations, FY2003-FY2021
(in millions of current dollars)

Sources: Department of Commerce, NIST budget documents, appropriations acts, and explanatory statements
for FY2003-FY2021.
Note: ARRA = American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. The level shown for the FY2020 request includes
those amounts ($288.0 mil ion) requested by the President as part of a proposed GSA Federal Capital Revolving
Fund to be used for NIST renovation. While the Administration requested the revolving funds be established via
mandatory funding and repaid through NIST annual discretionary appropriations, the Congressional Budget
Office (CBO) estimated this proposal in a manner consistent with current practice that capital expenditures are
recorded on a cash basis in the federal budget.
Figure 4. Construction of Research Facilities Account, Excluding Funding for
Congressionally Directed Projects and the
Competitive Construction Grant Program
Enacted Appropriations, FY2003-FY2020 Requested Appropriations, FY2003-FY2021

Sources: Department of Commerce, NIST budget documents, appropriations acts, and explanatory statements
for FY2003-FY2021.
Congressional Research Service

10

link to page 15 link to page 15 link to page 16

The National Institute of Standards and Technology: An Appropriations Overview

Note: ARRA = American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. The level shown for the FY2020 request includes
those amounts ($288.0 mil ion) requested by the President as part of a proposed GSA Federal Capital Revolving
Fund to be used for NIST renovation. While the Administration requested the revolving funds be established via
mandatory funding and repaid through NIST annual discretionary appropriations, the Congressional Budget
Office (CBO) estimated this proposal in a manner consistent with current practice that capital expenditures are
recorded on a cash basis in the federal budget.
Industrial Technology Services Account
Figure 5 illustrates requested and enacted funding levels for the NIST ITS account. ITS requests
and appropriations during this period have included the MEP, NNMI, AMTech, ATP, TIP, and
Baldrige programs in some or all years. Total appropriations for the ITS account fell from $284.8
million in FY2003 to $128.4 million in FY2012, grew to $155.0 million in FY2016 and have
since remained flat. Congress appropriated $162.0 million in FY2020. The FY2021 request
provides $25.3 million for Manufacturing USA (also referred to as the National Network for
Manufacturing Innovation or NNMI), $9.3 million (58.1%) higher than the FY2020 enacted level
of $16.0 million. Of these funds, $20.0 million would be for the award and initial funding of a
second Manufacturing USA institute; and $5.3 million would be for coordination of the
Manufacturing USA network. The President’s FY2021 request includes no funding for MEP.
Substantial fluctuations in the levels of funding requested and provided for the MEP, ATP, and
TIP programs are reflected in aggregate in Figure 5, and illustrated and discussed in more detail
on the following pages.
Figure 5. Industrial Technology Services Account
Enacted Appropriations, FY2003-FY2020; Requested Appropriations, FY2003-FY2021
(in millions of current dollars)

Sources: Department of Commerce, NIST budget documents, appropriations acts, and explanatory statements
for FY2003-FY2021.
Manufacturing Extension Partnership Program
Figure 6 illustrates requested and enacted funding levels for the NIST MEP program. FY2003
enacted appropriations of $105.9 million were cut to $38.6 million in FY2004, but returned to
Congressional Research Service

11

The National Institute of Standards and Technology: An Appropriations Overview

near the FY2003 level in FY2005 ($107.5 million) and stayed near that level through FY2007.
The MEP funding dipped again in FY2008, to $89.6 million, then rose over the next several years
to $140.0 million in FY2018. Requests from FY2003 to FY2009 were substantially lower than
appropriations, falling to $2.0 million in FY2009. In FY2010, the Obama Administration
requested $124.7 million for MEP. From FY2012 to FY2017, requests were somewhat higher
than enacted appropriations. For FY2018, President Trump requested $6.0 million for the MEP
program to provide “for the orderly wind down of federal funding for the program”; however,
Congress appropriated $140.0 million.25 For FY2019 and FY2020, President Trump requested no
funding for MEP; Congress appropriated $140.0 million and $146.0 million, respectively. For
FY2021, President Trump is again requesting no funding for MEP.
Figure 6. Manufacturing Extension Partnership Program
Enacted Appropriations, FY2003-FY2020; Requested Appropriations, FY2003-FY2021
(in millions of current dollars)

Sources: Department of Commerce, NIST budget documents, appropriations acts, and explanatory statements
for FY2003-FY2021.
Advanced Technology Program/Technology Innovation Program
The Advanced Technology Program saw its requests fall from $107.9 million in FY2003 to zero
in FY2005, and its appropriations fall from $178.9 million in FY2003 to zero in FY2008; no
funding was requested in FY2005 and subsequent years. The Technology Innovation Program,
which succeeded ATP, was first funded at $65.2 million in FY2008 and rose to $69.9 million in
FY2010 before falling to $45.0 million in FY2011. The TIP program received no funding in
FY2012 or in subsequent years. The $69.9 million requested for TIP in FY2010 was fully funded;
in FY2011 the TIP request was $79.9 million, and in FY2012 it was $75.0 million. No funding
has been requested for TIP since FY2012.

25 NIST, National Institute of Standards and Technology/National Technical Information Service Fiscal Year 2018
Budget Submission to Congress, May 2017, p. NIST-4.
Congressional Research Service

12

The National Institute of Standards and Technology: An Appropriations Overview

Figure 7. Advanced Technology Program and Technology Innovation Program
Enacted Appropriations, FY2003-FY2020; Requested Appropriations, FY2003-FY2021
(in millions of current dollars)

Sources: Department of Commerce, NIST budget documents, appropriations acts, and explanatory statements
for FY2003-FY2021.

Congressional Research Service

13

The National Institute of Standards and Technology: An Appropriations Overview

Concluding Observations
When NBS was renamed NIST under the provisions of the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness
Act of 1988, the laboratory was given additional missions and supporting programs. Two of the
new programs—the Advanced Technology Program and the Manufacturing Extension Partnership
program—were intended to improve U.S. innovation and industrial competitiveness. These
programs generated criticism from some policymakers and analysts who objected to them on a
variety of grounds, including whether such activities are appropriate for the federal government to
undertake; whether they might result in suboptimal choices of technologies, choices better left to
market forces; whether certain technologies, companies, or industries might be chosen for support
based on criteria other than technical or business merit; and whether tax dollars should be
awarded to already-profitable firms.
In contrast, NIST’s historical mission of conducting laboratory research in support of standards
and metrics continued to enjoy broad support and faced little controversy. Evidence of this
support can be seen in the selection of the STRS account—through which NIST laboratory work
is funded—as one of the targeted accounts in the doubling efforts of former Presidents George W.
Bush and Barack Obama and successive Congresses. However, even with broad support and the
absence of controversy, funding for the NIST STRS account did not grow at the pace its
advocates supported in presidential budget requests and successive authorizations of
appropriations due to tight overall fiscal constraints on the federal budget.
These issues are discussed in more detail below.
NIST Doubling Effort
In the early 2000s, many industry, academia, and policy leaders expressed growing concern that
federal investments in physical sciences and engineering research were not growing fast enough
to keep the United States on the leading edge of technological innovation and commercial
competitiveness. In his 2006 State of the Union remarks, President Bush announced the American
Competitiveness Initiative (ACI), which, among other things, sought to double funding for
targeted appropriations accounts that fund physical sciences and engineering research over a 10-
year period. Among the targeted accounts were the NIST STRS and construction accounts.
Subsequently, Congress passed the America COMPETES Act (P.L. 110-69), which set
appropriations authorizations for the targeted accounts for FY2008-FY2010 that represented a
compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 10.1% that would have, if continued, resulted in a
doubling over approximately seven years.
In his FY2010 Plan for Science and Innovation, President Obama stated that he (like President
Bush) would seek to double funding for basic research over 10 years (FY2006 to FY2016) at the
ACI agencies. Actual appropriations, however, did not keep pace with the America COMPETES
Act authorization levels. In his FY2011 budget request, President Obama extended the period
over which he intended to double these agencies’ budgets to 11 years. In 2010, Congress enacted
the America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010 (P.L. 111-358), setting appropriations
authorizations for the targeted accounts for FY2011-FY2013 at a level that effectively set an 11-
year doubling pace (a 6.3% CAGR). However, as with the original act, appropriations did not
keep pace with the authorization act levels. While reiterating President Obama’s intention to
double funding for the targeted accounts from their FY2006 levels, President Obama’s FY2013
budget request did not specify the length of time over which the doubling was to take place.
President Obama’s FY2014 budget expressed a commitment to increasing funding for the
targeted accounts, but did not commit to doubling. President Obama’s FY2017 budget did not
Congressional Research Service

14

The National Institute of Standards and Technology: An Appropriations Overview

address the doubling effort. From FY2006, the base year for the doubling effort, through FY2016,
funding for the NIST STRS and construction accounts grew by 42.3% in nominal terms, a
compound annual growth rate of 3.6%, a rate that would result in doubling in about 20 years.
President Obama’s FY2017 request sought an increase in aggregate funding for these accounts of
2.0%. President Trump’s budget requests for FY2018-FY2021 have not mentioned this doubling
goal. The doubling effort appears to no longer be a priority for Congress or the President. It
remains to be seen how support for internal R&D at NIST will evolve.
NIST Technology Policy
Some of NIST’s external programs have faced substantial opposition over time. Beginning with
the 104th Congress, many Members expressed skepticism over a “technology policy” based on
providing federal funds to industry for development of precompetitive generic technologies. This
philosophical shift from previous Congresses, coupled with pressures to balance the federal
budget, led to significant reductions in funding for NIST’s external programs. The Advanced
Technology Program and the Manufacturing Extension Partnership, which accounted for over
50% of the FY1995 NIST budget, were proposed for elimination. Although in the past strong
support by the Senate led to their continued financing, funding for ATP remained controversial.
Beginning in FY2000, the House-passed appropriations bills did not contain funding for ATP, and
many of the budget proposals submitted by former President George W. Bush called for
abolishing the program. In the 110th Congress, the America COMPETES Act eliminated ATP and
replaced it with the TIP initiative. While TIP received appropriations from FY2008 to FY2011, it
has received no appropriations since. In his FY2003 budget proposal, President Bush also
recommended suspension of federal support for those MEP centers in operation for more than six
years; the following year, funding for the MEP program was significantly reduced. However, the
FY2005 Omnibus Appropriations Act brought support for MEP back up to the level necessary to
fully fund the existing centers. Since then, funding has grown from $107.5 million in FY2005 to
$130.0 million in FY2016. President Obama requested $142.0 million for MEP for FY2017, an
increase of $12.0 million (9.2%); Congress provided $130 million, an amount equal to its
FY2016 level. For FY2017, Congress provided $140.0 million for MEP. President Trump’s
FY2018 budget request sought to end the MEP program, providing $6.0 million in FY2018 to
provide “for the orderly wind down of federal funding for the program.”26 President Trump’s
FY2019 request would provide no funding for MEP. For more information on the MEP program,
see CRS Report R44308, The Manufacturing Extension Partnership Program, by John F. Sargent
Jr.
National Network for Manufacturing Innovation
In his FY2013 budget, President Obama requested $1 billion in mandatory funding for the
creation of a National Network for Manufacturing Innovation27 to help accelerate innovation by
investing in industrially relevant manufacturing technologies with broad applications, and to
support manufacturing technology commercialization by bridging the gap between the laboratory
and the market. Congress did not act on this request or on President Obama’s FY2014 request for
the same amount. In FY2015, President Obama requested $2.4 billion for the NNMI as part of his
Opportunity, Growth, and Security Initiative. President Obama also requested $5.0 million for

26 NIST, National Institute of Standards and Technology/National Technical Information Service Fiscal Year 2018
Budget Submission to Congress, May 2017, p. NIST-4.
27 For more information on President Obama’s proposed National Network for Manufacturing Innovation, see CRS
Report R42625, The Obama Administration’s Proposal to Establish a National Network for Manufacturing Innovation,
by John F. Sargent Jr.
Congressional Research Service

15

The National Institute of Standards and Technology: An Appropriations Overview

coordination of manufacturing innovation institutes as part of NIST’s budget request. In
December 2014, Congress enacted the Revitalize American Manufacturing and Innovation
(RAMI) Act of 2014 as Title VII of Division B of the Consolidated and Further Continuing
Appropriations Act, 2015 (P.L. 113-235), establishing a Network for Manufacturing Innovation
(NMI). The act does not appropriate funds specifically for the NMI program but instead
authorizes NIST to spend up to $5.0 million of funds appropriated to NIST’s ITS account each
year from FY2015 to FY2024 to carry out the program. In addition, the act authorizes the
Department of Energy (DOE) to transfer up to $250.0 million to NIST for the 10-year period
FY2015 to FY2024 to carry out the program.28 As of the date of this report, DOE has not
transferred any funding to NIST for this purpose.
Through the end of calendar year 2015, seven NNMI institutes sponsored by the Department of
Defense (DOD) and Department of Energy had been awarded, and two additional institutes were
being competed. In December 2015, Congress appropriated specific funding, for the first time, for
the establishment and coordination of institutes under the provisions of the RAMI Act. The
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016 (P.L. 114-113) provided NIST with $25.0 million for
FY2016 for the NNMI, to include funding for establishment of institutes and up to $5.0 million
for coordination activities. The explanatory statement accompanying the act directed NIST to
“follow the direction of the Revitalize American Manufacturing and Innovation Act of 2014 in
requiring open competition to select the technological focus areas of industry-driven
manufacturing institutes.”29
NIST subsequently announced its intention to establish two institutes.30 On December 16, 2016,
NIST awarded the National Institute for Innovation in Manufacturing Biopharmaceuticals
(NIIMBL), led by the University of Delaware, “to advance U.S. leadership in biopharmaceutical
manufacturing.”31 NIST did not award a second institute due to a lack of funds.
P.L. 116-93 provided $16.0 million for NIST NNMI efforts in FY2020, to include funding for
NIIMBL and for network coordination activities.
As of the date of this report, 14 NNMI institutes have been established—eight by DOD, five by
DOE, and one by the Department of Commerce. A new DOD-sponsored instituted is being
competed in FY2020. A second NIST-sponsored institute has been requested in the President’s
budget.
As Congress undertakes the FY2021 appropriations process, an overarching issue will be how to
respond to the Trump Administration’s FY2021 NIST budget request (expected in February 2020)
and its policy implications, how much funding to provide to NIST in aggregate, and how to
allocate NIST appropriations among the core standards and measurement functions performed by
its laboratories and NIST external programs, such as MEP and Manufacturing USA.
For a broader discussion about the Network for Manufacturing Innovation and associated policy
issues, see CRS Report R44371, The National Network for Manufacturing Innovation, by John F.
Sargent Jr.

28 The act authorizes the Department of Energy to provide the funds only from amounts appropriated for advanced
manufacturing research and development within its Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy account.
29 Explanatory Statement, P.L. 114-113.
30 NIST, Notice of Intent: National Network for Manufacturing Innovation (NNMI) Institute Awards, December 21,
2015, http://www.nist.gov/amo/nnmi/upload/NIST-NNMI-NOI-2015-12-21.pdf.
31 Office of Advanced Manufacturing, NIST, DOC, website, “NIST Manufacturing USA Institutes,”
https://www.nist.gov/amo/nist-manufacturing-usa-institutes.
Congressional Research Service

16

link to page 21 link to page 21 link to page 21 link to page 21 link to page 22 link to page 22 link to page 22 link to page 22 link to page 22 link to page 22 link to page 22 The National Institute of Standards and Technology: An Appropriations Overview

Appendix A. Requested and Enacted Discretionary
Appropriations for NIST Accounts
Table A-1. Requested and Enacted Appropriations for NIST Accounts
Enacted Appropriations, FY2003-FY2020; Requested Appropriations, FY2003-FY2021
(in millions of current dollars)
Scientific and
Technical
Industrial
Research and
Technology
Construction of
Services
Services
Research Facilities
NIST, Total
(STRS)a
(ITS)a
(CRF)
Fiscal Year
Request
Enacted
Request
Enacted
Request
Enacted
Request
Enacted
2021
737.5

652.0

25.3

60.2

2020
974.8
1,034.0
611.7
754.0
15.2
162.0
347.9
118.0
2019
629.1
985.5
573.4
724.5
15.1
155.0
40.5
106.0
2018
725.0
1,198.5
600.0
724.5
21.0
155.0
104.0
319.0
2017
1,014.5
954.0
730.5
690.0
189.0
155.0
95.0
109.0
2016
1,119.7
964.0
754.7
690.0
306.0
155.0
59.0
119.0
2015
900.0
863.9
680.0
675.5
161.0
138.1
59.0
50.3
2014
928.3
850.0
693.7
651.0
174.5
143.0
60.0
56.0
2013b
857.0
769.4
648.0
579.8
149.0
133.6
60.0
56.0
2012
1,001.1
750.8
678.9
567.0
237.6
128.4
84.6
55.4
2011c
918.9
750.1
584.5
507.0
209.6
173.2
124.8
69.9
2010
846.1
856.6
534.6
515.0
194.6
194.6
116.9
147.0
2009d
636.0
819.0
535.0
472.0
4.0
175.0
99.0
172.0
2009 ARRAe
—
580.0
—
220.0
—
—
—
360.0
2008f
640.7
755.8
500.5
440.5
46.3
154.8
93.9
160.5
2007
581.3
676.9
467.0
434.4
46.3
183.8
68.0
58.7
2006g
532.0
752.0
426.3
394.8
46.8
183.6
58.9
173.7
2005h
521.5
699.2
422.9
378.8
39.2
247.9
59.4
72.5
2004i
496.8
608.5
387.6
336.5
39.6
207.8
69.6
64.3
2003j
577.5
707.5
402.2
357.1
120.8
284.8
54.5
65.7
Sources: CRS analysis of Department of Commerce and NIST budget documents, FY2003-FY2018; P.L. 115-141
and accompanying explanatory statement.
Notes: Dashes in cells in this table indicate no request or appropriation was made for that year. Accounts may
not add to totals due to rounding.
a. Funding for the Baldrige Performance Excellence Program was provided in the STRS account appropriation
through FY2011; in FY2012, funding was requested in the ITS account appropriation.
b. Enacted levels reflect the 1.877% rescission, 0.2% rescission, and the 5% sequester applied to 2013
annualized CR level.
c. Enacted levels include 0.2% across-the-board rescission.
Congressional Research Service

17

The National Institute of Standards and Technology: An Appropriations Overview

d. Enacted levels for STRS appropriation include $3.475 mil ion in congressionally directed projects. The
FY2009 amount for CRF appropriation includes $44 mil ion in congressionally directed projects and $30
mil ion for a competitive construction grant program.
e. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) amount for CRF includes $180 mil ion for a
competitive construction grant program for research science buildings. Not reflected above, ARRA also
included a $20 mil ion transfer from the Department of Health and Human Services for standards-related
research on electronic medical records and an expected $10 mil ion from a Department of Energy
interagency agreement to help develop a comprehensive framework for a nationwide smart electrical grid.
f.
The enacted FY2008 level for STRS appropriations includes $893,000 in congressionally directed projects.
The enacted FY2008 level for CRF appropriations includes $51.3 mil ion in congressionally directed projects
and $30 mil ion for a new competitive construction grant program that was not requested by President
Bush.
g. Enacted levels reflect across-the-board rescissions enacted in P.L. 109-108, FY2006 Science, State, Justice,
and Commerce Appropriations Act and in P.L. 109-148, FY2006 Defense Appropriations Act ($9.7 mil ion).
Does not reflect MEP unobligated balances rescission of $7 mil ion. The amounts for STRS and for the
Construction of Research Facilities appropriation include $11.9 mil ion and $125.4 mil ion for
congressionally directed projects, respectively.
h. Enacted levels reflect across-the-board rescissions enacted in P.L. 108-447, FY2005 Consolidated
Appropriations Act ($9.5 mil ion). Does not reflect ATP unobligated balances rescission of $3.9 mil ion. The
amounts for STRS and for the Construction of Research Facilities appropriation include $8.8 mil ion and
$42.9 mil ion for congressionally directed projects, respectively.
i.
Enacted levels reflect across-the-board rescissions enacted in the FY2004 Consolidated Appropriations Act,
P.L. 108-199 ($6.6 mil ion) and NIST’s share of the Department of Commerce’s unobligated balances
rescission ($13.0 mil ion).
j.
Enacted levels reflect an across-the-board rescission enacted in P.L. 108-7 ($4.6 mil ion).
Congressional Research Service

18

link to page 23 link to page 23 link to page 23 link to page 23 link to page 23 link to page 23 link to page 23 link to page 23 link to page 24 link to page 24 link to page 24 link to page 24 link to page 24 link to page 24 link to page 24 link to page 24 link to page 24 link to page 24 The National Institute of Standards and Technology: An Appropriations Overview

Appendix B. Requested and Enacted Appropriations
for Selected NIST Programs
Table B-1. Requested and Enacted Appropriations for Selected NIST Programs
Enacted Appropriations, FY2003-FY2020; Requested Appropriations, FY2003-FY2021
(in millions of current dollars)
Hollings
Advanced
Manufacturing
Manufacturing
Manufacturing
Innovation
NNMI/
Advanced
Technology
Extension
Technology
Institutes
Manufacturing
Technology
Innovation
Fiscal
Partnership
Consortia
Coordination
USA
Program
Program
Year
Request Enacted Request Enacted Request Enacted Request Enacted Request Enacted Request Enacted
2021
0.0

—

5.3

20.0

—

—

2020
0.0
146.0
—
—
5.2
—a
10.2
16.0a
—
—
—
—
2019
0.0
140.0
—
—
5.1
5.0b
10.0
10.0b
—
—
—
—
2018
6.0
140.0
—
—
5.0
5.0c
10.0
10.0c
—
—
—
—
2017
142.0
130.0
—
—
—
5.0a
47.0
20.0a
—
—
—
—
2016
141.0
130.0
15.0
—
—

150.0
25.0
—
—
—
—
2015
141.0
130.0
15.0
8.1
5.0
e
f
—
—
—
—
—
2014
153.1
128.0
21.4
15.0
—
—
f
—
—
—
—
—
2013g
128.0
123.0
21.0
10.6
—
—
f
—
—
—
—
—
2012
142.6
128.4
12.3
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
75.0
—
2011h
129.7
128.4
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
79.9
44.8
2010
124.7
124.7
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
69.9
69.9
2009
2.0
110.0
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
65.0
2008
46.3
89.6
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
65.2
2007
46.3
104.7
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
79.1
—
—
2006i
46.8
104.6
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
79.0
—
—
2005j
39.2
107.5
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
140.4
—
—
2004k
12.6
38.6
—
—
—
—
—
—
27.0
169.1
—
—
2003l
12.9
105.9
—
—
—
—
—
—
107.9
178.8
—
—
Sources: CRS analysis of Department of Commerce and NIST budget documents, FY2003-FY2018; P.L. 115-141
and accompanying explanatory statement.
Notes: Empty cells in this table indicate no request or appropriation was made for that year.
a. P.L. 116-93 and the accompanying Explanatory Statement state that $16.0 mil ion is provided for the NNMI,
but neither explicitly references funding for coordination activities of the network.
b. H.Rept. 116-9 states that $15.0 mil ion is appropriated for the NNMI, of which $5.0 mil ion may be used for
coordination activities of the network.
c. House Print 29-456 states that $15.0 mil ion is appropriated for the NNMI, of which $5.0 mil ion may be
used for coordination activities of the network.
Congressional Research Service

19

The National Institute of Standards and Technology: An Appropriations Overview

d. House Print 25-289 states that $25.0 mil ion is appropriated for the NNMI, of which $5.0 mil ion may be
used for coordination activities of the network.
e. P.L. 113-235 states, “To the extent provided for in advance by appropriations Acts, the Secretary may use
not to exceed $5,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2015 through 2024 to carry out this section from
amounts appropriated to the Institute for Industrial Technical Services.”
f.
President Obama requested $1 bil ion in mandatory funding for the NNMI for FY2013; $1 bil ion in
mandatory funding for FY2014; and $2.4 bil ion in mandatory funding for FY2015.
g. Enacted levels reflect the 1.877% rescission, 0.2% rescission, and the 5% sequester applied to 2013
annualized CR level.
h. Enacted levels include 0.2% across-the-board rescission.
i.
Enacted levels reflect across-the-board rescissions enacted in P.L. 109-108, FY2006 Science, State, Justice,
and Commerce Appropriations Act and in P.L. 109-148, FY2006 Defense Appropriations Act.
j.
Enacted levels reflect across-the-board rescissions enacted in P.L. 108-447, FY2005 Consolidated
Appropriations Act ($9.5 mil ion). Does not reflect ATP unobligated balances rescission of $3.9 mil ion.
k. Enacted levels reflect across-the-board rescissions enacted in the FY2004 Consolidated Appropriations Act,
P.L. 108-199, and NIST’s share of the Department of Commerce’s unobligated balances rescission.
l.
Enacted levels reflect an across-the-board rescission enacted in P.L. 108-7.

Author Information

John F. Sargent Jr.

Specialist in Science and Technology Policy

Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan
shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and
under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other
than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in
connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not
subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in
its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or
material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to
copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.

Congressional Research Service
R43908 · VERSION 42 · UPDATED
20