link to page 1 
 
 
Updated September 18, 2020
Carbon Storage Requirements in the 45Q Tax Credit
The Internal Revenue Code Section 45Q tax credit is 
issuance of regulations. The guidance established that 
intended to promote investment in carbon capture and 
taxpayers claiming the 45Q tax credits must demonstrate 
sequestration (CCS), a process designed to reduce 
secure geological storage by calculating the amount of CO2 
emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) from power plants 
at the source of capture using methodologies contained in 
and other industrial sources. Geologic sequestration of 
EPA’s 2009 Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases 
carbon dioxide (CO2), a type of carbon storage, is a process 
Rule (40 C.F.R. Part 98). This rule does not regulate GHG 
aiming to permanently store the captured gases deep 
emission levels but requires facilities designated as GHG 
underground. The Section 45Q tax credit can be claimed for 
sources to report annual GHG emissions as part of EPA’s 
the capture and sequestration of carbon oxides, categorized 
Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP)  and to 
as (1) CO2 captured directly from industrial facilities 
follow monitoring, recordkeeping, and verification 
originally placed in service before February 9, 2018; (2) 
requirements. Title 40, Part 98, Subparts RR and UU, of the 
CO2 and other carbon oxides captured directly from 
Code of Federal Regulations, added in 2010, apply to GHG 
industrial facilities originally placed in service on or after 
sources associated with the underground injection and 
February 9, 2018; and (3) CO2 captured directly from the 
sequestration of CO2. 
ambient air (“direct air capture”). In 2020, Section 45Q 
provides tax credits of $31.77 per ton for carbon oxide that 
Subpart RR 
is geologically sequestered and $20.22 per ton for carbon 
Subpart RR applies to facilities with wells that inject CO2 
oxide that is sequestered during enhanced oil recovery 
for long-term geologic sequestration. This includes all wells 
(EOR),  or used in other qualified industrial processes. 
classified by EPA as Underground Injection Control (UIC) 
These tax credits increase to $50 and $35 per ton, 
Class VI geologic sequestration wells. The facilities must 
respectively, by 2026.  
calculate and report (1) the mass of CO2 received; (2) the 
mass of CO2 injected into the subsurface; (3) the mass of 
In June 2020, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued a 
CO2 produced (mixed with produced oil, gas, or other 
notice of proposed rulemaking, “Credit for Carbon Oxide 
fluids); (4) the mass of CO2 emitted by surface leakage; (5) 
Sequestration,” which includes proposed requirements for 
the mass of CO2 emitted as equipment leakage or vented 
demonstrating the “secure geological storage” of carbon 
from surface equipment; (6) the mass of CO2 sequestered in 
oxides in underground formations needed to qualify for 
subsurface geologic formations; and (7) the cumulative 
45Q tax credits (85 Federal Register 34050). Section 45Q 
mass of CO2 sequestered since the start of required 
and this proposed rule cover a larger set of chemical 
reporting. Subpart RR also requires facilities to submit a 
substances (i.e., carbon oxides) compared to some other 
proposed monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) 
federal GHG-related rules, which specifically target CO2. 
plan meeting certain requirements to EPA (Table 1). Once 
approved, EPA issues a final MRV plan. 
Secure Geological Storage in 45Q 
Section 45Q tax credits were enacted as part of the Energy 
Table 1. Subpart RR MRV Plan Requirements 
Extension and Improvement Act of 2008 (P.L. 110-343, 
 
Delineation  of the maximum and active monitoring  areas 
Division B). Section 45Q(f)(2) of the act required the 
Department of the Treasury, in consultation with the 
 
Identification of potential CO2 leakage  pathways in the 
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Department 
maximum  monitoring area and the likelihood,  magnitude, 
of Energy, and the Department of the Interior, to establish 
and timing of surface leakage through these pathways 
regulations for the secure geological storage of qualified 
 
Strategy to detect and quantify CO2 surface leakage 
carbon oxide to prevent release into the atmosphere. 
 
Strategy to establish the expected baselines  for 
Further, the provision defined secure geological storage 
monitoring CO2 surface leakage 
locations to include “deep saline formations, oil and gas 
reservoirs, and unmineable coal seams ,” under conditions 
 
Considerations intended to be used to calculate site-
as determined in regulations. Secure geological storage is 
specific variables in the mass balance equation 
required whether the taxpayer is claiming the credit for 
 
UIC wel  number, if permitted under the UIC program 
carbon oxides used as a tertiary injectant and consequently 
 
Proposed date to begin col ecting data for calculating the 
stored during EOR operations or injected into underground 
total amount of CO2 sequestered 
formations solely for geologic sequestration. 
Source: 40 C.F.R. Part 98, Subpart RR. 
Connection to EPA’s Greenhouse Gas 
Reporting Program Requirements 
From 2016, the first year of reporting, through 2018, the 
latest year for which GHGRP data are available, five 
In 2009, IRS Notice 2009-83  provided interim guidance on 
facilities injecting CO
specific requirements for secure geological storage, pending 
2 have reported CO2 data to EPA 
under Subpart RR. This includes one facility in Illinois 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
Carbon  Storage  Requirements  in the 45Q  Tax Credit 
injecting industrial CO
Requirements for Enhanced Oil Recovery 
2 into a s aline aquifer. As  of 2018, 
the facility reported that 1,031,652 tons of CO2 had been 
The proposed rule would establish two options for 
sequestered at the site. The other reporting facilities 
demonstrating secure geological storage for carbon oxides 
injecting CO2 do not qualify for the 45Q tax credit because 
stored during EOR operations. Taxpayers could meet the 
the CO2 originates from natural, underground formations, 
requirements by either (1) storing carbon oxides in 
so sequestration does not reduce net CO2 emissions into the 
compliance with Subpart RR requirements or (2) storing 
atmosphere. Although it is not required for the latter 
carbon oxides in compliance with a standard adopted by the 
facilities, all of the above facilities have EPA-approved 
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and 
MRV plans. 
endorsed by the American National Standards Institute 
(CSA/ANSI ISO 27916:19).  According to the Treasury 
Subpart UU 
Department, the methodology of this standard is similar to 
Subpart UU applies to GHG source facilities with wells 
the Subpart RR methodology in that both “require an 
used to inject CO2 during EOR operations or for any 
assessment and monitoring of potential leakage pathways; 
purpose other than geologic sequestration. These facilities 
qualification of inputs, losses and storage through a mass 
are required to report the volume of CO2 received and its 
balance approach; and documentation of steps and 
origin (if known). An MRV plan is not required, but 
approaches.” In the preamble to the proposed rule, the 
facilities may choose to submit a plan.  
department observes that many stakeholders requested 
flexibility in the requirements and suggested this standard 
Nearly 120 facilities have reported to EPA under Subpart 
as an alternative for demonstrating secure geological 
UU since the first year of required reporting in 2011, 
storage. 
including three facilities that received research and 
development exemptions from Subpart RR reporting. These 
The IRS also proposes that EOR facilities can self-certify 
facilities have reported a total of 2,764,386 tons of CO2 
carbon oxide volumes claimed for the tax credit if they 
received for injection from 2011 through 2018. Subpart UU 
choose to demonstrate secure geological storage through 
does not require facilities to report the amount of CO2 
compliance with Subpart RR. If the facility uses the ISO 
sequestered.   
standard, however, the documentation must be certified 
annually by a qualified independent engineer or geologist.  
2020 45Q Proposed Rule 
Section 1-45Q-3 of the IRS proposed rule would require 
Issues for Congress 
taxpayers to demonstrate “secure geological storage.” The 
Many proponents of CCS view clarification of CO2 secure 
rule would establish that compliance with relevant 
storage requirements as a critical step in the development 
provisions of the EPA’s Mandatory Reporting of 
and commercial deployment of large-scale CCS projects in 
Greenhouse Gases Rule satisfies the 45Q secure storage 
the United States. Clear regulatory requirements for secure 
demonstration requirements. In addition, the proposal 
geological storage may lead to increased interest in the 45Q 
would require that carbon oxides must also be injected into 
tax credit and further development of CCS projects, which 
a well that complies with applicable EPA UIC regulations 
some in Congress see as necessary to meet GHG emissions 
to be considered secure geological storage. 
reduction targets. Clearer regulatory guidance may also 
help the IRS identify improper claims for the 45Q tax 
The IRS rule proposes separate requirements for geologic 
credit. 
sequestration and EOR operations. Previous IRS guidance 
on secure geological storage, issued prior to both the 2010 
To date, five facilities have reported volumes of CO2 
EPA Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases Rule 
sequestered under Subparts RR and UU. One facility is 
Subparts RR and UU and EPA’s 2010 regulations on 
currently required to have an MRV plan under Subpart RR 
underground injection of CO2 for geologic sequestration, 
and Class VI UIC regulations. If growth in commercial-
did not distinguish between the two types of injection or 
scale CCS expands in the coming years, as some anticipate, 
GHG  sources. 
more facilities throughout the United States may begin to 
sequester CO2, report CO2 sequestration data to EPA, and 
Requirements for Geologic Sequestration 
claim the 45Q tax credit. Notwithstanding the regulations 
The proposed rule would require taxpayers seeking the 45Q 
discussed above, some stakeholders have expressed 
credit for geologic sequestration of CO2 to dispose of 
concerns about the long-term security of geologic 
carbon oxides in secure geological storage so that no 
sequestration of CO2—concerns that could be heightened as 
qualified carbon oxides escape into the atmosphere. Under 
both the number of CCS projects and the volume of CO2 
the proposal, to meet the conditions of secure geological 
injected increase. Congress may consider expanding 
storage, carbon oxide storage must be in compliance with 
oversight of implementation of its directives for 45Q and 
Subpart RR requirements. Therefore, a taxpayer who 
the GHGRP  as part of an overall GHG reporting policy. 
fulfills Subpart RR requirements for calculating the volume 
Congress may also consider whether EPA and the IRS have 
of carbon oxides sequestered and has an EPA-approved 
sufficient resources to effectively manage potential 
MRV plan, along with other applicable Subpart RR 
increases in GHG reporting and MRV plans submitted for 
provisions, would meet the requirements for secure 
approval and oversee 45Q tax credit claims and other 
geological storage. All UIC Class VI wells are already 
programmatic needs associated with the new regulations. 
subject to Subpart RR, so the proposal would not add any 
new requirements for the owners or operators of these 
Angela C. Jones, Analyst in Environmental Policy   
wells.  
IF11639
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
Carbon  Storage  Requirements  in the 45Q  Tax Credit 
 
 
Disclaimer 
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to 
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. 
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has 
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the 
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be 
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include 
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permissio n of the copyright holder if you 
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 
 
https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF11639  · VERSION  3 · UPDATED