Status of FY2021 Labor, Health and Human
Services, and Education Appropriations:
In Brief

July 20, 2020
Congressional Research Service
https://crsreports.congress.gov
R46457




link to page 3 link to page 4 link to page 5 link to page 6 link to page 7 link to page 8 link to page 8 link to page 8
Status of FY2021 LHHS Appropriations

Contents
Scope of the LHHS Bill ................................................................................................... 1
Context for FY2021 ........................................................................................................ 2
FY2020 Regular and Supplemental Appropriations ......................................................... 3
FY2021 Discretionary Spending Limits and Appropriations Allocations............................. 4
LHHS Legislative Action ................................................................................................. 5

Tables
Table 1. Comparison of FY2021 LHHS Discretionary Subal ocations with
FY2020 Enacted .......................................................................................................... 6

Contacts
Author Information ......................................................................................................... 6




Status of FY2021 LHHS Appropriations

ongress recently began to consider the FY2021 appropriations bil for the Departments of
Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies (LHHS).1 On
C July 13, 2020, the House Appropriations Committee voted to report the LHHS bil, 30-22;
the measure was subsequently reported to the House on July 15 (H.R. 7614; H.Rept. 116-450).
Senate Appropriations Committee action on the FY2021 LHHS bil has yet to occur.
This report provides a brief summary of the status of LHHS appropriations during the FY2021
cycle, including relevant congressional actions and a top-line comparison of discretionary funding
enacted in FY2020 versus relevant FY2021 legislative proposals. It also provides background on
the scope of the bil and the budgetary context for congressional decisionmaking.
Congressional clients may consult the LHHS experts list in CRS Report R42638, Appropriations:
CRS Experts
, for information on which analysts to contact at the Congressional Research Service
(CRS) with questions on specific agencies and programs funded in the LHHS bil .
Scope of the LHHS Bill
The LHHS bil is the largest ($1.1 tril ion in FY2020) of the 12 annual appropriations bil s when
accounting for both mandatory and discretionary funding.2 It provides annual y appropriated
budget authority for the following federal departments and agencies:
 the Department of Labor (DOL);
 most agencies at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), except
for the Food and Drug Administration (funded through the Agriculture
appropriations bil ), the Indian Health Service (funded through the Interior-
Environment appropriations bil ), and the Agency for Toxic Substances and
Disease Registry (funded through the Interior-Environment appropriations bil );
 the Department of Education (ED); and
 more than a dozen related agencies (RA), including the Social Security
Administration, the Corporation for National and Community Service, the
Corporation for Public Broadcasting, the Institute of Museum and Library
Services, the National Labor Relations Board, and the Railroad Retirement
Board.
In general, mandatory funding represents just over 80% of the total LHHS bil , supporting
annual y appropriated entitlements such as Medicaid and Supplemental Security Income (SSI).
Discretionary funds account for less than 20% of total funds in the bil , but they tend to receive
the most attention throughout the LHHS appropriations process.3 This is because the
appropriations process general y has little control over the amounts provided for appropriated

1 For background on the FY2020 LHHS appropriations bill, see CRS Insight IN11114, FY2020 LHHS Appropriations:
Status
.
2 T he discretionary funding provided in the LHHS appropriations act is both provided and controlled by that act. T he
mandatory funding provided in the LHHS act is controlled by provisions in authorizing law. For definitions of these
and other budget terms, see U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), A Glossary of Term s Used in the Federal
Budget Process
, GAO-05-734SP, September 1, 2005, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-05-734SP. (T erms of interest
may include budget authority, appropriated entitlement, direct spending, discretionary, entitlement authority, and
mandatory.)
3 For an illustrative discussion of the distribution of funds among the different titles of the bill, and between
discretionary and mandatory spending, see the summary of FY2019 LHHS appropriations in CRS Report R45869,
Labor, Health and Hum an Services, and Education: FY2019 Appropriations, pp. 10-12.
Congressional Research Service
1

Status of FY2021 LHHS Appropriations

entitlements; rather, the authorizing statute controls the program parameters (e.g., eligibility rules,
benefit levels) that entitle certain recipients to payments.
Even though discretionary appropriations represent a relatively smal share of the entire LHHS
bil , the bil is typical y the largest single source of nondefense discretionary funding for the
federal government. (The Department of Defense bil is the largest single source of discretionary
funding overal .)
Calculating Total LHHS Budget Authority
Budget authority is the amount of money a federal agency is legal y authorized to commit or spend.
Appropriations bil s may include budget authority that becomes available in the current fiscal year, in future fiscal
years, or some combination. Amounts that become available in future fiscal years are typical y referred to as
advance appropriations.
The amount of LHHS budget authority can be tabulated in various ways. The total amount of budget authority
provided in an appropriations bil (i.e., total in the bil ) would be calculated regardless of the year in which the
funding becomes available.4 In some cases, however, such as the 302(b) subal ocations (discussed later), the total is
calculated based on current-year appropriations (i.e., the amount of budget authority available for obligation in a given
fiscal year
, regardless of the year in which it was first appropriated).5 Additional y, scorekeeping and other types of
adjustments made by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) to reflect budget enforcement conventions and
special instructions of Congress may be reflected in or excluded from the calculation of budgetary totals.6
Context for FY2021
Under the congressional budget process, the start of annual appropriations decisionmaking
traditional y is preceded by the submission of the President Trump’s budget request and the
adoption of the congressional budget resolution. The President’s FY2021 budget request was
submitted to Congress on February 10, 2020.7 On March 17, 2020, the President submitted a
letter to Congress about FY2021 budget amendments (along with a supplemental appropriations
request for FY2020) related to the response to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
outbreak.8 These budget amendments affected the FY2021 President’s requested levels for several
accounts at DOL, HHS, ED, and certain LHHS related agencies, including the Social Security
Administration and the Railroad Retirement Board.
In the aftermath of the President’s budget submission, appropriations decisionmaking has
proceeded on the basis of procedures and budgetary limits enacted in the Bipartisan Budget Act
of 2019 (P.L. 116-37). In addition, congressional action on FY2021 appropriations may be
influenced by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. A number of emergency FY2020 supplemental

4 Such figures include advance appropriations provided in the bill for future fiscal years, but do not include advance
appropriations provided in prior years’ appropriations bills that become available in the current year.
5 Such figures exclude advance appropriations for future years, but include advance appropriations from prior year s that
become available in the given fiscal year.
6 For more information on scorekeeping, see CRS Report 98-560, Baselines and Scorekeeping in the Federal Budget
Process
. See also a discussion of key scorekeeping guidelines included in the joint explanatory statement
accompanying the conference report to the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 ( H.Rept. 105-217, pp. 1007-1014).
7 For further information on the HHS budget request, see CRS Report R46321, Department of Health and Human
Services: FY2021 Budget Request
. Note that the report covers the FY2021 President’s request for HHS in its entirety,
not just the components of the agency funded through the annual LHHS bill.
8 Executive Office of the President, Office of Management and Budget, Letter from Acting Director Russell T . Vought
to T he Honorable Michael R. Pence, March 17, 2020, https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Letter-
regarding-additional-funding-to-support -the-United-States-response-to-COVID-19-3.17.2020.pdf.
Congressional Research Service
2

link to page 8 Status of FY2021 LHHS Appropriations

discretionary appropriations have been enacted in response to the pandemic. These supplementals
have significantly increased available LHHS budgetary resources for FY2020. Further
supplemental appropriations may be considered during the FY2021 cycle. These and related
issues are summarized below.
FY2020 Regular and Supplemental Appropriations
FY2020 regular appropriations for LHHS were enacted as part of the Further Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2020, on December 20, 2019 (FY2020 LHHS omnibus; P.L. 116-94).
Discretionary appropriations in the FY2020 LHHS omnibus totaled $195.4 bil ion (including
advance appropriations for future years, but excluding certain scorekeeping adjustments).9 This
amount was 3.2% more than FY2019 enacted levels. The omnibus also provided $902.3 bil ion in
mandatory funding, for a combined LHHS total of $1.098 tril ion.
Subsequently, five acts have been signed into law providing FY2020 supplemental discretionary
appropriations for LHHS programs and activities. The first of these acts (P.L. 116-113), enacted
on January 29, 2020, provided $210 mil ion in additional funding to DOL to carry out the United
States-Mexico-Canada Agreement.10 The remaining four, which together contain more than 99%
of the LHHS supplemental appropriations provided for FY2020 ($279.8 bil ion), were part of the
legislative response to the COVID-19 global pandemic:11
 Title III, Division A, of the Coronavirus Preparedness and Response
Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2020 (P.L. 116-123), enacted on March 6,
2020;
 Title V, Division A, of the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA,
P.L. 116-127), enacted on March 18, 2020;
 Title VIII, Division B, of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security
Act (CARES Act, P.L. 116-136), enacted on March 27, 2020; and
 Title I, Division B, of the Paycheck Protection Program and Health Care
Enhancement Act (PPPHCEA, P.L. 116-139), enacted on April 24, 2020.
Al of these additional funds were designated as an “emergency requirement” and thus were
effectively exempted from otherwise applicable budget enforcement requirements, such as the
discretionary spending limits.12
In total, FY2020 supplemental appropriations increased regular FY2020 LHHS enacted funding
by about 143%. The bulk of the supplemental funding (89%) was directed at HHS. The $248
bil ion in supplemental HHS funds represented a 261% increase over the agency’s FY2020

9 T his amount differs from what is listed in Table 1 because it captures total discretionary budget authority provided in
the FY2020 LHHS omnibus, regardless of when the funds become available. It does not include advance appropriations
from prior years that became available in FY2020, but does include current -year appropriations that become available
in future years. In addition, this total does not reflect certain scorekeeping adjustments applied by the Congressional
Budget Office (e.g., effects of one-time rescissions or changes in mandatory program spending).
10 T itle IX of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2019, (USMCA, P.L.
116-113). T he USMCA supplemental appropriations of $210 million for DOL were for the Bureau of International
Labor Affairs (ILAB) to support the implementation and enforcement of the USMCA. T he labor -related provisions in
the USMCA, which are associated with ILAB’s role, are discussed in CRS Report R44981, NAFTA and the United
States-Mexico-Canada Agreem ent (USMCA)
, pp. 32-33.
11 For further information on the LHHS appropriations provided by these COVID-19 supplementals, see CRS Report
R46353, COVID-19: Overview of FY2020 LHHS Supplem ental Appropriations.
12 For further information, see CRS Report R45778, Exceptions to the Budget Control Act’s Discretionary Spending
Lim its
.
Congressional Research Service
3

Status of FY2021 LHHS Appropriations

regular appropriations funding level. ED received the next largest increase via supplemental
funds (43%), whereas DOL and RA received the smal est increases relative to their initial
FY2020 enacted levels (5% and 3%, respectively).
As the FY2021 appropriations cycle progresses, Congress and the President may consider
whether further COVID-19 response funding is desirable and, if so, the extent to which such
funding would continue to be enacted separately in supplemental appropriations measures or be
integrated into regular appropriations decisionmaking. In addition, any COVID-19 response
funding in a regular LHHS appropriations measure could be provided via appropriations that are
subject to the nondefense limit, or as emergency appropriations that are effectively exempt from
that limit.
FY2021 Discretionary Spending Limits and Appropriations
Allocations
The framework for budget enforcement under the congressional budget process has both statutory
and procedural elements. The statutory elements include limits on defense and nondefense
discretionary spending established by the Budget Control Act of 2011 (BCA; P.L. 112-25); LHHS
appropriations are classified as nondefense spending. The procedural elements are primarily
associated with the budget resolution and provide a limit on total discretionary spending available
to the appropriations committees (commonly referred to as a 302(a) allocation) and limits on
spending under the jurisdiction of each appropriations subcommittee (302(b) suballocations).
Certain spending, such as that designed for an emergency requirement and for certain program
integrity-related purposes, is effectively exempt from these limits (commonly referred to as cap
adjustments).13
On August 2, 2019, the FY2020 and FY2021 BCA spending limits were increased via the
enactment of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2019 (BBA 2019; P.L. 116-37).14 The FY2021
nondefense limit ($626.5 bil ion) was 0.8% (+$5 bil ion) more than the FY2020 limit. In addition,
BBA 2019 provided procedures to establish the spending al ocations to the House and Senate
appropriations committees via statements submitted to the Congressional Record by the chairs of
the House and Senate budget committees, without the adoption of a budget resolution.15 Among
other requirements, these spending al ocations must be consistent with the levels established by
the statutory discretionary spending limits. These FY2021 committee-level spending al ocations
were submitted in the House on May 1, and in the Senate on May 4, 2020.16
General y, the next step in the appropriations process is for each of the appropriations committees
to adopt subal ocations from the total amount al ocated to them. These 302(b) subal ocations
provide a limit on current-year (e.g., FY2021) appropriations within each subcommittee’s
jurisdiction and incorporate any applicable scorekeeping adjustments made by CBO. The House
Appropriations Committee adopted 302(b) subal ocations for each of its 12 subcommittees on

13 Ibid.
14 For further information, see CRS Insight IN11148, The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2019: Changes to the BCA and
Debt Lim it
.
15 Ibid. For a general discussion of budget enforcement mechanisms that may be adopted in the absence of a budget
resolution, see CRS Report R44296, Deem ing Resolutions: Budget Enforcement in the Absence of a Budget Resolution.
16 “Publication of Budgetary Material,” Congressional Record, daily edition, Vol. 166, No. 82 (May 1, 2020), pp.
H1968-H1969. “ Budget Enforcement Levels for Fiscal Year 2021,” Congressional Record, daily edition, Vol. 166, No.
83 (May 4, 2020), pp. S2205-S2206.
Congressional Research Service
4

link to page 8 Status of FY2021 LHHS Appropriations

July 9.17 The House initial LHHS discretionary subal ocation for FY2021 was $182.9 bil ion, and
is discussed further below.18 The Senate Appropriations Committee has not yet adopted its
subal ocations. Revisions to subal ocations throughout the appropriations process are a common
practice to reflect actual action on appropriations bil s and changes in congressional priorities.
However, if the House and Senate take divergent approaches with regard to the topline that each
assumes for the LHHS bil , complications may potential y arise as the chambers seek to resolve
their differences on appropriations.
LHHS Legislative Action
On July 13, 2020, the House Appropriations Committee voted to report the FY2021 LHHS
appropriations bil , 30-22; the measure was subsequently reported to the House on July 15 (H.R.
7614; H.Rept. 116-450). This was preceded by subcommittee approval of the draft bil on July 7,
by a vote of 9-6. Full committee approval of the initial subal ocations for al 12 bil s, including
LHHS, occurred on July 9, by a vote of 29-21 (H.Rept. 116-443).
Table 1 displays the FY2021 House discretionary subal ocation for LHHS, along with the
enacted FY2020 funding level. The amount for “regular discretionary appropriations” does not
include any funding that is subject to program integrity adjustements or emergency-designated,
such as the funding that was enacted in the FY2020 supplemental appropriations acts. In addition,
as noted previously, the subal ocations represent current-year budget authority subject to the
spending limits and take into account any applicable CBO scorekeeping adjustments. Under this
method of estimating the bil , the House subal ocation would decrease FY2021 discretionary
funding for LHHS by about $128 mil ion (-0.1%) relative to the FY2020 enacted level. However,
using a different methodology, the House Appropriations Committee calculated that the funding
in the draft LHHS bil , which was subsequently reported as H.R. 7614, would represent an
increase of more than $2 bil ion relative to the FY2020 enacted level.19
H.R. 7614 also would provide an estimated $24.425 bil ion in emergency-designated funding for
purposes associated with COVID-19 response, which is effectively exempt from those spending
limits.20 In addition, it would provide the maximum amount al owed under the FY2021 cap
adjustments for program integrity funding ($1.881 bil ion). These funds are also effectively
exempt from the limits. The “adjusted appropriations” total in the table includes this funding
along with “regular discretionary appropriations.”
Senate Appropriations Committee action on the FY2021 LHHS bil has yet to occur. The
committee also has not released its subal ocations.

17 House Appropriations Committee, “Appropriations Committee Approves FY2021 Subcommittee Allocations,” July
9, 2020, press release, https://appropriations.house.gov/news/press-releases/appropriations-committee-approves-fy-
2021-subcommittee-allocations.
18 T he House Appropriations Committee subsequently reported revised 302(b) suballocations ( H.Rept. 116-454, July
16, 2020), although the LHHS discretionary suballocation was unchanged from the initial amount.
19 House Appropriations Committee, “ Appropriations Committee Releases Fiscal Year 2021 Labor-HHS-Education
Funding Bill,” press release, July 6, 2020, https://appropriations.house.gov/news/press-releases/appropriations-
committee-releases-fiscal-year-2021-labor-hhs-education-funding. See also related discussion on H.Rept. 116-450, p.
3.
20 Ibid.
Congressional Research Service
5

Status of FY2021 LHHS Appropriations

Table 1. Comparison of FY2021 LHHS Discretionary Suballocations with
FY2020 Enacted
Budget authority in bil ions of dol ars

FY2021 House Initial
FY2021 Senate Initial
FY2020 Enacted
Suballocation
Suballocation
Regular discretionary
appropriations
183.042
182.914
TBD
Adjustments:



Program integrity
1.842
1.881

Emergency
requirements
280.000
24.475

Adjusted appropriations:
464.884
209.270

Source: The FY2020 enacted amount is from Congressional Budget Office (CBO), Report on the Status of
Discretionary Appropriations, Fiscal Year 2020, House of Representatives, as of April 24, 2020
, https://www.cbo.gov/
system/files?file=2020-05/FY2020-House-2020-4-24.pdf. The FY2021 House “regular discretionary
appropriations” initial subal ocation is from H.Rept. 116-443 (July 13, 2020). The House initial 302(b)
subal ocations for LHHS did not include al ocations for the program integrity or emergency requirements
adjustments; the amounts are listed in the table for informational purposes. The amount listed for “program
integrity” is based on CRS analysis of the House Appropriations Committee-reported version of H.R. 7614. The
amount listed for “emergency requirements” is from House Appropriations Committee, “Appropriations
Committee Releases Fiscal Year 2021 Labor-HHS-Education Funding Bil ,” press release, July 6, 2020,
https://appropriations.house.gov/news/press-releases/appropriations-committee-releases-fiscal-yea r-2021-labor-
hhs-education-funding.
Notes: TBD = to be determined. Amounts reflect current-year discretionary budget authority subject to
spending limits. Totals exclude funds for which special rules apply under the spending limits (e.g., funds for
certain program integrity activities) and funds provided under authorities in the 21st Century Cures Act (P.L.
114-255) that are effectively exempt from the spending limits.


Author Information

Jessica Tollestrup
Karen E. Lynch
Specialist in Social Policy
Specialist in Social Policy


Congressional Research Service
6

Status of FY2021 LHHS Appropriations



Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan
shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and
under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should n ot be relied upon for purposes other
than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in
connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not
subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in
its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or
material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to
copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.

Congressional Research Service
R46457 · VERSION 1 · NEW
7