link to page 1 

 
May 1, 2020
U.S.-Kenya FTA Negotiations
On February 6, President Trump and President Uhuru 
(absorbing 9% of Kenya’s exports). In contrast, Kenya’s 
Kenyatta of Kenya announced their intent to begin free 
largest trading partner, China, accounted for 3% of Kenya’s 
trade agreement (FTA) negotiations. If successful, it would 
exports in 2019 ($147 million of Kenya’s reported $5.8 
be the first U.S. FTA with a country in sub-Saharan Africa. 
billion total) while supplying 21% of its reported imports 
Congressional interest may include: (1) Congress’s 
($3.6 billion of $17.1  billion). In 2019,  the United States 
constitutional authority to regulate foreign commerce, such 
reported a goods trade deficit with Kenya, with U.S. exports 
as setting U.S. trade negotiating objectives, and considering 
of $375 million and imports of $667 million. U.S. exports 
FTAs through implementing legislation; (2) the FTA’s 
were concentrated in plastics ($58 million), machinery and 
potential effects on the U.S. economy, and trade and foreign 
electrical machinery ($58 million), aircraft ($55 million), 
policy implications; and (3) mandates in the African 
and wheat ($27 million).  Imports consisted mostly of 
Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA, P.L. 106-200,  as 
apparel ($454 million),  macadamia nuts ($55 million), 
amended), in which Congress directed the President to seek 
titanium ores ($52 million), and coffee/tea ($41 million). 
African FTA partners and granted the region tariff benefits. 
U.S. imports from Kenya have grown on average by more 
than 10% annually since 2001, when AGOA’s tariff 
Kenya is not a major U.S. trade partner in global terms, but 
benefits took effect (Figure 1). 
it is one of Africa’s most dynamic economies and the 
second-largest beneficiary of AGOA’s tariff benefits, 
Figure 1. U.S. Goods Imports from Kenya 
excluding crude oil. The United States views Kenya as a 
strategic partner in the region: the country is a major 
beneficiary of U.S. security and foreign assistance, and a 
hub for U.S. security initiatives in the region. Kenya hosts 
the largest U.S. diplomatic mission on the continent. 
On March 17, the United States Trade Representative 
(USTR) notified Congress of its intent to begin negotiations 
with Kenya, as required under Trade Promotion Authority 
(TPA) at least 90 days before negotiations commence. This 
means talks may begin as early as mid-June under TPA 
rules. USTR outlined four goals for the agreement: to serve 
 
as a model for future U.S. FTAs in Africa, to contribute to 
Source: Data from U.S. International Trade Commission. 
regional integration efforts, to build on AGOA objectives, 
and to expand U.S. trade and investment ties with Africa. 
Notes: African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) figures 
include imports under the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP). 
U.S.-Kenya Economic Ties 
Tariff Rates and Other Trade Restrictions 
Kenya has achieved an average GDP growth rate of 5.9% 
over the past decade. However, it remains a lower middle-
As members of the World Trade Organization (WTO), 
income country, with GDP per capita of just under $2,000 
trade between the United States and Kenya is governed by 
in 2019, and 83% of employment in the informal sector as 
WTO commitments , including each country’s most-favored 
of 2017. With almost 40% of its population of roughly 50 
nation (MFN) tariff rates —uniform rates applied to all other 
million under age 15, a coming surge in the labor force will 
WTO members. The United States, however, provides 
present both challenges and opportunities for future growth 
unilateral preferential tariff treatment (below MFN rates) to 
prospects. 
most Kenyan exports through AGOA. AGOA is similar to 
the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP), but builds on 
Currently, Kenya’s economic relationship with the United 
GSP by providing duty-free treatment to a broader range of 
States is concentrated in trade in goods. The U.S. Bureau of 
U.S. imports. Kenya is a member of the East African 
Economic Analysis does not provide official statistics on 
Community (EAC) customs union and shares a common 
U.S.-Kenya services trade due to its low value. Nearly all 
external tariff schedule with the four other EAC members  
bilateral investment activity is comprised of U.S. foreign 
(Burundi, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Uganda), although it 
direct investment (FDI) in Kenya, valued at $380 million in 
applies its own tariff rates on a limited number of products. 
2018. Majority-owned foreign affiliates of U.S. 
multinational firms employed 5,900 people in Kenya in 
U.S. Tariffs. In 2019, nearly 80% of U.S. imports from 
2017 (latest data available), with total sales of $1.0 billion. 
Kenya entered duty-free under either AGOA or GSP, and 
remaining imports were largely duty-free on an MFN basis. 
Kenya is a relatively small U.S. trading partner (96th largest 
The U.S. average effective applied tariff (total imports 
divided by duties) on Kenyan imports was 0.1% in 2019. 
in 2019), but the United States is a major trading partner 
(5th largest) and second-largest export market for Kenya 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
U.S.-Kenya  FTA Negotiations 
Kenya’s Tariffs. According to the WTO, Kenya’s average 
Moving Beyond AGOA 
applied MFN tariff rate for all partners was 13.5% in 2018. 
Another challenge is how to successfully transition from the 
Several top U.S. exports, such as machinery and aircraft, 
current non-reciprocal bilateral trade relationship governed 
however, face low or zero tariffs. Kenya’s agriculture sector 
by AGOA and GSP. Establishing new apparel trade rules 
presents the highest barriers to U.S. exports, with an 
may be particularly complicated. As a lesser-developed 
average tariff of 20.3%, and relatively high tariffs on dairy 
beneficiary country (LDBC) under AGOA, Kenya qualifies 
(51.7%), animal products (23.1%), and cereals (22.2%). 
for AGOA’s third-country fabric rule, which allows Kenya 
to export apparel made with imported fabrics to the United 
Other Barriers. USTR’s national trade barriers report 
States duty-free. In 2019, 97% of all U.S. apparel imports 
notes concerns over Kenya’s broad ban on genetically 
under AGOA were assembled in LDBCs from third-country 
engineered food and feed products. It also highlights 
fabrics. By contrast, U.S. FTAs typically use a more 
Kenya’s 2019 Data Protection Act as potentially creating 
stringent “yarn forward” rule of origin, requiring local or 
uncertainties for cross-border data flows. Kenya is  not a 
U.S. sourcing of yarn and fabrics to qualify for duty-free 
member of the WTO Government Procurement Agreement, 
treatment. Negotiators must also set rules for allowable 
and grants exclusive preference to Kenyan companies for 
levels of sourcing from other AGOA countries.  
procurements under roughly $500,000. 
Relation to African Regional Trade Initiatives 
Motivations for Trade Talks 
Kenya’s membership in the EAC and the African 
For the United States, an FTA could fulfill the shared goal 
Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA)—and U.S. goals to 
of Congress (as stipulated in AGOA) and the 
support these regional initiatives—will also likely factor in 
Administration to expand ties with trading partners in 
the trade talks. Kenya's external trade policy is  affected by 
Africa and transitioning them to a more reciprocal 
its EAC commitments, and EAC interests may influence 
framework. An FTA could also help foster economic 
Kenya's negotiating positions. A U.S.-Kenya agreement 
growth in both countries and encourage Kenya’s efforts to 
could affect regional trade patterns (e.g., through rules of 
continue to improve its business environment and domestic 
origin requirements) and set precedents for regional trade 
economic reforms. Kenya’s World Bank Doing Business 
and investment rules. Similar issues apply regarding the 
score has risen from 58 to 73 since 2016. U.S. officials may 
AfCFTA, an Africa-wide trade agreement, set to take effect 
also see the trade talks as a strategic tool to counter growing 
in 2020. The AfCFTA’s MFN clause requires Kenya to 
Chinese influence on the continent. 
extend tariff concessions granted to the United States to 
AfCFTA members on a reciprocal basis. 
With AGOA set to expire in 2025,  Kenya may see benefit 
in securing permanent preferential access to its second-
Timeline and Next Steps 
largest export market. The Kenyatta administration may 
USTR intends to pursue talks with Kenya under TPA, 
also see an FTA as supporting its economic agenda and 
which sets parameters for the timeline and other conditions. 
signaling commitment to liberal economic policies in order 
TPA, currently set to expire on July 1, 2021,  would allow 
to attract FDI. Kenya likely also seeks to bolster its  
for expedited congressional consideration of the FTA, if it 
strategic relationship with the United States, potentially 
makes progress toward achieving statutory negotiating 
boosting its position vis-à-vis regional rivals. 
objectives and the Administration satisfies TPA notification 
and consultation requirements. Such requirements include 
“…we look forward to negotiating and concluding a 
issuing agreement-specific negotiating objectives at least 30 
comprehensive, high-standard agreement with Kenya 
days before negotiations commence. Stakeholder comments 
that can serve as a model…across Africa.” 
to inform these objectives were due to USTR by April 28.  
USTR Lighthizer, February 6, 2020 
Issues for Congress 
Key Issues for Bilateral FTA Talks 
A U.S.-Kenya FTA would address congressional statutory 
The significant economic development disparities between 
objectives and represent a milestone in U.S.-Africa trade 
the two countries suggest possible differences in 
and economic relations. As negotiations unfold, Congress 
negotiating priorities. A key challenge will likely be to 
may seek to consider and advise the Administration on the 
establish a framework for the talks that can achieve the 
scope and extent of the agreement’s potential commitments; 
ambitious level of commitments Congress directs the 
how to prioritize FTA talks among other U.S. policy 
Administration to seek in FTAs. At the same time, such a 
objectives in Africa, including responses to the COVID-19 
framework must remain politically and economically viable 
pandemic; how to ensure the agreement and its rules of 
in Kenya amidst domestic pressure to maintain protections 
origin support regional integration efforts; and the types of 
for import-sensitive or nascent industries. Potentially 
support (e.g., capacity building funds) and potential 
contentious topics include the timing and extent of tariff 
flexibilities (e.g., phasing of commitments) appropriate to 
liberalization including on agricultural goods; rules on 
Kenya’s level of development. 
intellectual property rights, investment, and data flows; and 
See Also: CRS In Focus IF10168, Kenya, by Lauren Ploch 
the level of labor and environmental protections. The 
Blanchard; and CRS In Focus IF10149, African Growth 
Trump Administration describes the talks as an opportunity 
to develop a “model” FTA
and Opportunity Act (AGOA), by Brock R. Williams. 
, but has not specified what 
changes from past practice this may entail. U.S. FTA talks 
Brock R. Williams, Specialist in International Trade and 
with the South African Customs Union, which were 
Finance   
suspended in 2006 in part due to divergent views over 
Lauren Ploch Blanchard, Specialist in African Affairs    
scope, highlight the importance of establishing clear 
parameters for the negotiations at the outset.  
IF11526
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
U.S.-Kenya  FTA Negotiations 
 
 
Disclaimer 
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to 
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. 
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has 
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the 
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be 
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include 
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permissio n of the copyright holder if you 
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 
 
https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF11526  · VERSION  1 · NEW