Military Construction: Authorities, Process,
November 22, 2019
and Frequently Asked Questions
G. James Herrera
Congress appropriates several billion dollars annually to support the Department of
Analyst in U.S. Defense
Defense’s (DOD’s) worldwide military installations portfolio. Authorization for specific
Readiness and
military construction (MILCON) projects ―provided through the annual National
Infrastructure
Defense Authorization Act―enables the Secretary of Defense and the Secretaries of the

Army, Air Force, and Navy to plan, program, design, and build the runways, piers,

warehouses, barracks, schools, hospitals, child development centers, and other facilities
needed to support U.S. military forces at home and abroad. The end-to-end MILCON process by which DOD and
Congress act together to build military facilities, beginning with the requirement for a facility, and ending with a
completed structure, is lengthy and complex. Summarized, the MILCON process encompasses several steps, to
include:
 determination of a facility need by the local installation commander and public works
organization;
 vetting and prioritization of construction projects within the military chain of command and the
associated Military Department (MILDEP) or other DOD component;
 consolidation and budgeting within the Office of the Secretary of Defense to create the
infrastructure construction portion of the Future Years Defense Program (FYDP);
 inclusion of the final budget year list of projects in the annual President’s Budget Request to
Congress;
 review and adjustment of the budget year list by the congressional defense committees;
 consideration and passage of the necessary authorization and appropriation acts and their
enactment by the President of the United States; and
 design and execution of the approved construction projects by the MILDEP’s designated
Construction Agent or Design Manager/Construction Manager–Naval Facilities Engineering
Command (NAVFAC) for the Navy and Marine Corps, Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) for
the Army, and either NAVFAC, USACE, or the Air Force Civil Engineer Center (AFCEC) for the
Air Force–and their support contractors.

Congressional Research Service

link to page 36 Military Construction: Authorities, Process, and Frequently Asked Questions

Contacts
Author Information ........................................................................................................................ 32

Congressional Research Service

Military Construction: Authorities, Process, and Frequently Asked Questions

Introduction
The military missions of Department of Defense (DOD) and Military Department (MILDEP)
units, offices, and other organizations drive requirements for facilities and supporting
infrastructure at any given military installation. As missions change, or as organizations move to
or away from an installation, new facilities and supporting infrastructure may need to be built or
disposed of to match mission requirements. Similarly, as buildings age or become obsolete,
facilities and supporting infrastructure may need to be replaced, reconfigured, or otherwise
modernized to meet mission needs.
While each of the MILDEPs has its own unique process for vetting and setting military
construction (MILCON) priorities, in general, the MILCON process is formally structured to
comply with the DOD’s Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution (PPBE) process for
resource allocation.1 Nevertheless, for most MILCON projects, moving from the realization of a
construction need (i.e., a requirements determination) through the planning, programming, and
budgeting process could take three or more years. When adding the time required for
congressional authorization and appropriations to fund a project, implementation of the federal
contracting process (e.g., solicitation, awarding the contract, obligating funds, dispersing funds),
and physical construction, the end-to-end MILCON process could span five to seven years or
more.
This report describes and explains the end-to-end MILCON process by which DOD and the
Congress act together to build military facilities, beginning with the requirement for a facility, and
ending with a completed structure. Additionally, this report provides answers to Frequently Asked
Questions (FAQs) about the MILCON process and other associated programs and processes.
Examples of relevant MILCON documentation are contained within.
The Legal and Budgetary Framework
Chapter 169 of Title 10, “Military Construction and Military Family Housing,” contains most of
the provisions governing MILCON. Section 2801 of Chapter 169 provides definitions of certain
terms used throughout the chapter and elsewhere in law. The section defines the term military
construction as “any construction, development, conversion, or extension of any kind carried out
with respect to a military installation, whether to satisfy temporary or permanent requirements, or
any acquisition of land or construction of a defense access road.”2 It also specifies that a
MILCON project includes “all military construction work ... necessary to produce a complete and
usable facility or a complete and usable improvement to an existing facility (or to produce such
portion of a complete and usable facility or improvement as is specifically authorized by law).”3
The term military installation is defined in Title 10, section 2801(c)(4) to mean “a base, camp,
post, station, yard, center, or other activity under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of a military
department or, in the case of an activity in a foreign country, under the operational control of the
Secretary of a military department or the Secretary of Defense, without regard to the duration of

1 Exceptions include DOD authorities under sections 2803, 2804, 2808, and 2854 of Title 10 of the United States Code
(U.S.C.) which are not part of the normal PPBE process. See Department of Defense, Directive 4270.5, Military
Construction, p.3, at https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodd/427005p.pdf?ver=2018-11-
08-080607-280. For more information on the PPBE process, see CRS In Focus IF10429, Defense Primer: Planning,
Programming, Budgeting and Execution (PPBE) Process, by Brendan W. McGarry and Heidi M. Peters.
2 10 U.S.C. §2801.
3 Ibid.
Congressional Research Service
1

Military Construction: Authorities, Process, and Frequently Asked Questions

operational control.” In addition to the definition in Chapter 169 of Title 10, the term military
installation under 16 U.S.C. §670(1)(A) means “any land, or interest in land owned by the United
States and administered by the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a [MILDEP], except land
under the jurisdiction of the Assistant Secretary of the Army having responsibility for civil
works." In general, these definitions include all buildings, structures, training ranges, and other
improvements to real property that reside on a military installation.
Authority for MILCON Projects
Section 2802 of Title 10 specifies that the Secretary of Defense and the Secretaries of the
MILDEPs may carry out such MILCON projects, land acquisitions, and defense access road
projects “as are authorized by law.”4 The section goes on to authorize the following activities:
 surveys and site preparation;
 acquisition, conversion, rehabilitation, and installation of facilities;
 acquisition and installation of equipment and appurtenances integral to the
project;
 acquisition and installation of supporting facilities (including utilities) and
appurtenances incident to the project; and
 planning, supervision, administration, and overhead incident to the project.
The MILCON-unique authorization requirements specified in section 2802 are in addition to
those established by 10 U.S.C §114, which states that, for specified DOD programs including
MILCON, “no funds may be appropriated for any fiscal year...unless funds therefor have been
specifically authorized in law.”5 In the practical application of these statutes, Congress has
required project-by-project authorization and appropriation for military construction projects.6
Activities Funded Through MILCON Appropriations
The annual Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies Appropriation Bill
provides federal funding for DOD’s construction activities. Often referred to as the MILCON-VA
Appropriations Bill, this piece of legislation appropriates project-specific amounts for major
MILCON projects and a variety of other construction and construction-related activities, such as:
 Unspecified Minor Construction. Construction projects estimated to cost no
more than $6 million under authority provided in 10 U.S.C §2805. Unlike major
MILCON projects, unspecified minor construction projects are not subject to
specific congressional authorization; therefore, the amounts are appropriated as
unspecified minor construction.
 Planning and Design. Congress requires planning and design work on
anticipated expenditures for construction projects. This work must be far enough
along to provide confidence in the accuracy of the projected budget request.
Accordingly, most of the construction projects included in the President’s annual

4 10 U.S.C. §2821 holds a similar requirement for the construction and acquisition of military family housing.
5 10 U.S.C. §114(a).
6 For more information on authorizations and appropriations see U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO),
Principals of Federal Appropriations Law, Fourth Edition, Chapter 2, 2016 Rev., GAO-16-464SP, March 10, 2016, pp.
2-54, at https://www.gao.gov/legal/red-book/overview.
Congressional Research Service
2

Military Construction: Authorities, Process, and Frequently Asked Questions

budget request are based on planning and design work that was funded by this
non-specific appropriation.7
 Family Housing (New Construction). Replacement, acquisition, expansion,
addition, extension, and alteration of government-owned military family
housing.8
 Family Housing (Operations and Maintenance). Debt payment, leasing, minor
construction, principal and interest charges, insurance premiums, as well as the
provision of routine maintenance, utilities, and the general management of
government-owned family housing.
 Military Privatized Housing. Funding for the Military Housing Privatization
Initiative (MHPI) through the Family Housing Improvement Fund (FHIF) and
the Military Unaccompanied Housing Improvement Fund (MUHIF), separately.9
MHPI appropriations allow the military to enter into agreements with private
developers selected in a competitive process to own, maintain, and operate
family housing through a long-term lease.10
 Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC). Functions associated with the
implementation of past BRAC rounds (i.e., continuing environmental restoration
and caretaker costs) and/or new BRAC rounds when authorized by Congress.11
 North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Security Investment Program.
U.S. contributions to the acquisition and construction of common-use military
facilities and installations (including international military headquarters), and for
related expenses for the collective defense of the North Atlantic Treaty Area.12
 Chemical Demilitarization Construction. Military construction necessary to
support the destruction of the U.S. stockpile of lethal chemical agents and
munitions.13
Selected MILCON Authorities
Chapter 169 of Title 10 establishes several distinct authorities that allow DOD to perform
MILCON and expend funds for other facilities-related activities.14 Each authority typically has a
monetary threshold or other stipulated limitation associated with it and these restrictions set the

7 10 U.S.C. §2807.
8 Government-owned military housing for single service members (often referred to as Unaccompanied Housing) is
funded as major MILCON (e.g., a new barracks). However, military family housing is funded separately under the
general category of “Family Housing.”
9 See subchapter IV of 10 U.S.C. Ch. 169. Treasury funds for MHPI established under 10 U.S.C. §2883.
10 Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Sustainment, Military Housing Privatization, accessed October 21,
2019, at https://www.acq.osd.mil/eie/FIM/Housing/Housing_index.htmlv.
11 Congress is still providing funding for the implementation of fiscal year (FY) 2005 BRAC decisions. FY2019
appropriations for BRAC totaled $342 million. For more information on BRAC implementation see the U.S.
Government Accountability Office (GAO) website: Key Issues > Military Base Realignment and Closures, at
https://www.gao.gov/key_issues/realigning_closing_military_bases/issue_summary#t=0.
12 10 U.S.C. §2806. The 29 member states of NATO share the expense of common-use facilities by a formula under
which the United States is responsible for about 21% of the annual construction budget of the alliance.
13 See Section 1412 of the Department of Defense Authorization Act, 1986 (50 U.S.C. §1521).
14 Chapter 169 of Title 10 also includes authorities that support military housing.
Congressional Research Service
3

Military Construction: Authorities, Process, and Frequently Asked Questions

framework for the MILCON budget process. They are directly tied to congressional oversight of
DOD’s MILCON-related activities.
In prescribing the various MILCON authorities and responsibilities, Chapter 169 regularly uses
the term Secretary concerned, referring to the Secretaries of the MILDEPs, or the Secretary of
Defense in the case of a defense agency.15 When examining monetary thresholds and other
limitations, it is important to note whether the specific authority applies to the Secretary of
Defense, or to each Secretary concerned individually. Appendix B provides a reference table of
selected statutes governing MILCON and repair authorities and lists their limitations, where
applicable.
Unspecified Minor Construction (10 U.S.C. §2805)
Section 2805 of Title 10 authorizes the Secretary concerned to use an expedited process for the
authorization of unspecified minor military construction projects―currently defined as MILCON
projects costing $6 million or less (adjusted annually to reflect the area construction cost index).16
Under this authority, any project costing more than $750,000 requires advance approval by the
Secretary concerned.
In general, the Secretary concerned funds unspecified minor military construction projects as a
single amount using MILCON appropriations. However, where the estimated total cost is $2
million or less, the funds may be drawn from Operations and Maintenance (O&M)
appropriations, which are generally used to fund civilian salaries and awards, travel, fuel,
headquarters operations, expenses of operational military forces, training and education,
recruiting, depot maintenance, purchases from Defense Working Capital Funds (e.g., spare parts),
base operations support, and other items whose benefits are derived for a limited period of time.17
In practice, these O&M-funded projects are referred to as minor construction projects.
For unspecified minor military construction projects exceeding $2 million (and therefore subject
to MILCON appropriations authority), 10 U.S.C §2805 requires the Secretary concerned to
submit a notification to the appropriate committees of Congress.18 This notification is to include a
justification for the project as well as the estimated cost. Following a 14-day waiting period,
appropriations may then be drawn from an account set up by Congress in the MILCON
appropriation for that purpose.
In addition, 10 U.S.C. §2805 provides temporary authority (expiring September 30, 2025) for the
use of O&M, as well as certain Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E)

15 10 U.S.C. §2801.
16 Construction of military family housing units may not be carried out under the authority of 10 U.S.C. §2805(e).
Through FY2022, the Secretary concerned is required to adjust the dollar limitations specified in 10 U.S.C. §2805 for
unspecified minor military construction projects inside the United States to reflect the area construction cost index for
military construction projects (not to exceed $10 million). A construction cost index is an indicator of the average cost
over time of representative goods and services related to construction cost variations. It serves as a reflection of the
inflationary or deflationary changes of a specific sector of construction industry.
17 See 10 U.S.C. §2805(c). O&M appropriations are provided through the annual defense appropriations bill, rather
than the MILCON-VA Appropriations Bill.
18 10 U.S.C. §2801 defines the term appropriate committees of Congress as the “congressional defense committees and,
with respect to any project to be carried out by, or for the use of, an intelligence component of the Department of
Defense, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives and the Select Committee on
Intelligence of the Senate.” 10 U.S.C. §101 defines the term congressional defense committees as “the Committee on
Armed Services and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and the Committee on Armed Services and the
Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.”
Congressional Research Service
4

Military Construction: Authorities, Process, and Frequently Asked Questions

appropriations, to fund certain unspecified minor construction projects intended to enhance DOD
laboratories.19
This authority also requires the Secretary concerned to adjust the dollar limitations specified
under 10 U.S.C. §2805 for unspecified minor military construction projects inside the United
States, to reflect the area construction cost index for MILCON projects published by DOD during
the prior fiscal year for the location of the project (not to exceed $10 million). This requirement is
in effect through fiscal year 2022.20
Architectural, Engineering, and Design Services (10 U.S.C. §2807)
Section 2807 of Title 10 allows the Secretary concerned to obtain architectural and engineering
services, and to initiate construction design, in connection with MILCON projects, family
housing, and projects undertaken in connection with 10 U.S.C. §2854, Restoration or
replacement of damaged or destroyed facilities that are not otherwise authorized by law. If the
required services are estimated to exceed $1 million, congressional notification is required and
the Secretary concerned must wait 14 days before obligating funding for such purposes. These
services may be paid for using MILCON or Family Housing appropriations for planning and
design.21
Repair of Facilities (10 U.S.C. §2811)
Section 2811 of Title 10 allows the Secretary concerned to carry out certain “repair projects” on
facilities using O&M appropriations. The statutes defines a repair project as a project “(1) to
restore a real property facility, system, or component to such a condition that it may effectively be
used for its designated functional purpose; or (2) to convert a real property facility, system, or
component to a new functional purpose without increasing its external dimensions.” There are no
budgetary limitations or caps on this authority, but projects costing more than $7.5 million must
be approved in advance by the Secretary concerned, and Congress must be notified of the
decision to carry out the project. The notification must include a cost estimate and a justification
for the project. If the cost estimate exceeds 75 percent of the estimated cost of a MILCON project
to replace the facility, 10 U.S.C. §2811 also requires the congressional notification include an
explanation as to why replacement of the facility is not in the best interest of the government.
This authority also prohibits the construction of new facilities or additions to existing facilities.
Emergency Authorities22
The following DOD authorities are intended to be exercised in the event of a national emergency,
declaration of war, or other acute circumstance where the Secretary concerned determines a
MILCON project is immediately required to meet national security needs, or where waiting for

19 10 U.S.C. §2805 defines the term laboratory to include “a research, engineering, and development center” and “a test
and evaluation activity.”
20 For more information on unspecified minor military construction, see Department of Defense, Financial
Management Regulation 7000.14-R, Volume 3, Chapter 17, p. 17-15, June 2019, at
https://comptroller.defense.gov/Portals/45/documents/fmr/current/03/03_17.pdf.
21 For more information on MILCON Planning and Design, see Department of Defense, Financial Management
Regulation 7000.14-R, Volume 3, Chapter 17, p. 17-11, June 2019, at
https://comptroller.defense.gov/Portals/45/documents/fmr/current/03/03_17.pdf.
22 These authorities are not included in the normal planning, programming, and budgeting process.
Congressional Research Service
5

Military Construction: Authorities, Process, and Frequently Asked Questions

the next MILCON authorization would be “inconsistent with national security or national
interest.”23
Emergency Construction (10 U.S.C. §2803)
Under 10 U.S.C. §2803, the Secretary concerned may carry out a MILCON project not otherwise
authorized in law, if he or she determines that (1) it is vital to national security or to the protection
of health, safety, or the quality of the environment, and (2) the project is of such urgency that it
cannot wait for the next Military Construction Authorization Act (i.e., the National Defense
Authorization Act, or NDAA).24 When the Secretary concerned initiates a project under this
section, the Secretary is required to report it in writing to the appropriate congressional
committees (armed services and appropriations). This includes the justification for, and estimated
cost of, the project, the reason why Section 2803 is being invoked, and the source of the funds
being used. Accordingly, when a decision is made to request approval for an emergency
construction project, DOD submits a notification and request for the reprogramming of MILCON
funds in accordance with the aforementioned statutory provisions.25 There is a limit of $50
million that can be obligated under this authority during any given fiscal year. Additionally, a
project carried out under this authority must be funded within the total amount of MILCON
appropriations that have not been obligated.26 There is also a mandatory waiting period of five
days, beginning on the date the appropriate committees of Congress are notified, before the
emergency construction project may begin.
Contingency Construction (10 U.S.C. §2804)27
Section 2804 of Title 10 permits the Secretary of Defense (or the Secretary of a MILDEP if
authorized by the Secretary of Defense) to use appropriated MILCON funds to carry out a
MILCON project without prior congressional authorization, if the Secretary determines that
waiting to include it in the next MILCON Authorization Act would be “inconsistent with national
security or national interest.” Section 2804 requires the Secretary to submit a report in writing to

23 10 U.S.C. §2804.
24 There is no provision in Title 10 that explicitly grants this authority to the reserve components of the armed forces
(as they are defined in Chapter 1003 of Title 10), and the DOD does not consider emergency construction authority as
applicable to the reserve components. The reserve component’s real property acquisition authorities are provided in
Chapter 1803 of Title 10. See Department of Defense, Financial Management Regulation 7000.14-R, Volume 3,
Chapter 17, p. 17-19, June 2019, at https://comptroller.defense.gov/Portals/45/documents/fmr/current/03/03_17.pdf.
25 For more information on DOD regulations pertaining to emergency construction authority, see Department of
Defense, Financial Management Regulation 7000.14-R, Volume 3, Chapter 17, p. 17-18, June 2019, at
https://comptroller.defense.gov/Portals/45/documents/fmr/current/03/03_17.pdf.
26 Written into MILCON-VA appropriations acts is language allowing for the obligation (spending) of funds over a
number of years. Any funding left over in the various MILCON accounts at the end of a fiscal year is carried over and
can be obligated in subsequent years.
27 Section 2808 of the FY2004 National Defense Authorization Act (P.L. 113-66) temporarily authorized the
Secretary of Defense as much as $200 million in O&M funding “carry out a construction project outside the United
States necessary to meet “urgent military requirements of a temporary nature in support of a declaration of war, a
declaration by the President of a national emergency ... or a contingency operation.” This provision, often referred to as
“Section 2808 authority” (not to be confused with the permanent 10 U.S.C. §2808 - Construction Authority in the
Event of a Declaration of War or National Emergency) has been renewed for each subsequent year, though the cap on
available funds and the areas to which it may be applied have frequently been amended. Section 2807 of the FY2019
National Defense Authorization Act (P.L. 115-232) extended the authority through December 31, 2020, and set a
limit of $50 million.
Congressional Research Service
6

Military Construction: Authorities, Process, and Frequently Asked Questions

the appropriate congressional committees justifying the project and the invocation of this
authority and including an estimate of the cost of the project. Funds for contingency construction
are held in the DOD’s Contingency Construction Account. When a decision is made to request
approval for a construction project under this authority, DOD regulation requires submission of a
congressional notification and request for the reprogramming of MILCON funds in accordance
with the provisions of the statute.28 Yet, according to DOD Directive 4270.5, reprogramming is
not necessary for projects under Section 2804.29 Further, although DOD may initiate a MILCON
project under this authority without specific congressional authorization, according to DOD’s
Financial Management Regulation (7000.14-R), “Actual construction may not commence prior to
the receipt of appropriate DOD and congressional approval.”30
Construction Authority in the Event of a Declaration of War or National
Emergency (10 U.S.C. §2808)
In the event of a declaration of war or declaration of a national emergency by the President of the
United States that requires the use of the armed forces, 10 U.S.C. §2808 permits the Secretary of
Defense to initiate, or to authorize the Secretaries of the MILDEPs to carry out, MILCON
projects not yet authorized by statute.31 Any unobligated MILCON or family housing
appropriations may be used for construction projects that are “necessary to support such use of
the armed forces.” According to the statute, this authority may be exercised “without regard to
any other provision of law.” The Secretary of Defense must report to Congress the decision to use
this authority, along with the estimated costs of the projects, including any associated real estate
transactions. The authority terminates at the end of the war or national emergency.
For more information on the recent use of 10 U.S.C. §2808 authority, see CRS Insight IN11017,
Military Construction Funding in the Event of a National Emergency, by Michael J. Vassalotti
and Brendan W. McGarry. For more information on the DOD’s historical and current process for
exercising this authority, see CRS Report R45937, Military Funding for Southwest Border
Barriers, by Christopher T. Mann.
Planning, Programming, and Budgeting32
The need for a particular construction project may be part of a top-down initiative – such as the
creation of new missions for a given military installation or the movement of units or offices

28 Department of Defense, Financial Management Regulation 7000.14-R, Volume 3, Chapter 17, p. 17-20, June 2019,
at https://comptroller.defense.gov/Portals/45/documents/fmr/current/03/03_17.pdf.
29 DOD Directive 4270.5, Military Construction, at
https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodd/427005p.pdf?ver=2018-11-08-080607-280.
30 For more information on Contingency Construction, see Department of Defense, Financial Management Regulation
7000.14-R, Volume 3, Chapter 17, p. 17-19 and 17-20, June 2019, at
https://comptroller.defense.gov/Portals/45/documents/fmr/current/03/03_17.pdf.
31 10 U.S.C. §2808 states that a declaration of a national emergency must be in accordance with the National
Emergencies Act of 1976 (50 U.S.C. §1601 et seq.). The National Emergencies Act does not define the term “national
emergency.” See CRS Legal Sidebar LSB10267, Definition of National Emergency under the National Emergencies
Act, by Jennifer K. Elsea.
32 This section intentionally condenses the DOD’s lengthy and complex process for MILCON design and planning,
programming, and budgeting. An expanded and more detailed description of the MILCON process can be found within
the RAND report, Obtaining Life-Cycle Cost-Effective Facilities in the Department of Defense, at
https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR169.html. See also CRS In Focus IF10429, Defense Primer: Planning,
Programming, Budgeting and Execution (PPBE) Process, by Brendan W. McGarry and Heidi M. Peters.
Congressional Research Service
7

Military Construction: Authorities, Process, and Frequently Asked Questions

between installations – or it may be the result of needed modernization or replacement of existing
facilities determined at the local level (i.e., by installation stakeholders). In either case, the
process begins with a preliminary project justification and facility requirements analysis by the
installation’s public works department, which consists of engineers, community planners,
environmental specialists, and other public works professionals, subject to the direction of the
uniformed installation commander.33
Installation engineers and other public works staff evaluate the proposed need for new or
improved facilities such as training classrooms, firing ranges, barracks, and family housing, and
compare them to the facilities that already exist.34 The engineers will weigh the costs and time
required to rehabilitate, or alter structures, on site against the cost and time required to replace
them. Engineers and other members of the installation’s planning team then make a preliminary
determination of whether or not renovation of an existing facility, new construction, or leasing is
more appropriate to satisfy the proposed need.35 An initial project evaluation is followed by a
more comprehensive evaluation once a determined need generates a formal request for
MILCON.36
The prioritization of prospective MILCON at an installation generally begins with meetings
between the installation’s engineers and representatives of all major resident organizations and
other installation tenants. This group is commonly referred to as a Facilities Utilization Board.
The result of these meetings―a prioritized list of construction needs―is presented to the senior
installation commander, who then accepts or adjusts the priorities to create a final list of proposed
projects for service-level review.
Within these prioritized submissions, installation engineers include information about individual
MILCON projects in a Department of Defense Form 1391 (DD Form 1391), Military
Construction Project Data (see Appendix C for an example DD Form 1391). The DD Form 1391
for a particular project includes a cost estimate, a description of the proposed construction, the
specific requirement for the project (e.g., a change in mission or deterioration of facilities already
in use), the current facility situation at the installation, the impact on installation mission if the
project is not approved, and any other needed justification information.37 The DD Form 1391 will
accompany the construction request through the rest of the executive and legislative process.

33 The term “public works department” is used as a general descriptor to include each of the military services’ public
works organizations that are responsible for military installation real property development. A formal title for this type
of organization within the Army is an installation’s Directorate of Public Works, or DPW. See
https://home.army.mil/irwin/index.php/about/Garrison/directorate-public-works.
34 Installation engineers are the principal officers responsible for providing authoritative analysis and strategic program
recommendations for MILCON needs and priorities. Installation engineers may be referred to in various titles
according to each Military Service: the Post Engineer in the Army, Base Civil Engineer (BCE) in the Air Force and Air
National Guard, the Resident/Regional Officer in Charge of Construction (ROICC) in the Navy and Marine Corps, and
the Construction and Facilities Management Officer (CFMO) in the Army National Guard.
35 Constantine Samaras, et al., Development, Construction, and Operating Process and Barriers to Life-Cycle Cost-
Effectiveness, RAND Corporation, 2013, Ch. 2 p. 7.
36 Ibid. As noted previously, funding for additions or alterations to existing buildings and the construction of new
buildings, where costs exceed $2 million, is generally provided through annual MILCON appropriations. Facility repair
at a military base is generally supported through the O&M accounts in the annual defense appropriation bill. The O&M
sub-accounts associated with this type of maintenance work are generally referred to as Facilities Sustainment,
Restoration, and Modernization, or FSRM.
37 DD Form 1391s are associated with several other required DOD forms and their corresponding processes that help to
populate, or are informed by, the DD Form 1391. For example, the ENG FORM 3086 is a tool that cost engineers use
to estimate project costs for the DD Form 1391.
Congressional Research Service
8

Military Construction: Authorities, Process, and Frequently Asked Questions

Vetting and Prioritization within DOD
Once the prioritized lists of MILCON projects leave the installation commanders’ offices, they
follow different paths depending on the DOD organization responsible for managing a given
military installation. Figure 1 depicts these paths.
Department of the Army
The Secretary of the Army reorganized Army installations management in 2002 by creating the
Installation Management Agency (IMA) and assigning to it the responsibility for maintaining the
physical infrastructure of all Army posts and depots. Further consolidation and reorganization
followed in 2006, when the IMA was folded into the new Installation Management Command
(IMCOM), whose commanding general reported directly to the Army Chief of Staff. In March
2019, IMCOM became a major subordinate command to the Army Materiel Command (AMC).38
Today, IMCOM is the Army’s single agency responsible for worldwide installation management.
Prior to November 2016, IMCOM was divided into four regional directorates – Central, Atlantic,
Pacific, and Europe. Construction projects from Army posts were forwarded to the appropriate
IMCOM region, where the submissions from all the garrison commanders at installations within
its jurisdiction were reviewed and prioritized into a single consolidated list for the region. On
November 1, 2016, the Department of the Army realigned IMCOM’s two domestic regions–
Atlantic Region and Central Region – from a regional to a mission-oriented organization. These
regions were replaced by three functionally-aligned directorates which were co-located with three
major Army commands: IMCOM Readiness, which is co-located with Army Forces Command
(FORSCOM); IMCOM Training, which is co-located with Army Training and Doctrine
Command (TRADOC); and IMCOM Sustainment, which is co-located with AMC.39 The two
overseas directorates–IMCOM Europe and IMCOM Pacific–remained regional and are located in
Sembach Kaserne, Germany and Fort Shafter, Hawaii, respectively.
The prioritized lists developed by the five IMCOM directorates are submitted to Headquarters,
IMCOM, located at Fort Sam Houston in San Antonio, Texas. The headquarters consolidates,
considers, and prioritizes the project lists. It then submits an IMCOM-approved list for further
review by the Deputy Chief of Staff (DCS), G9 (formerly the Army’s Assistant Chief of Staff for
Installation Management, or ACSIM), the service’s senior officer responsible for setting
installations-related policy and administering installation resource programming.40 The Deputy
Chief of Staff, G-8, then assesses and integrates the installations-related resourcing requirements
into the overall budget of the Army.
At this point, responsibility for managing the Army’s construction requests shift to the civilian
Army Secretariat (the staff supporting the Secretary of the Army and his assistants). In the case of
MILCON, responsibility for further review and consideration falls to the Assistant Secretary of
the Army for Installations, Energy, and Environment (ASA(IE&E)). Once approved by the
Assistant Secretary, the Army’s proposed construction projects are ready to be sent to the Office

38 Susan A. Merkner, “IMCOM transitions to Army Materiel Command,” The Real McCoy, March 22, 2019,
https://static.dvidshub.net/media/pubs/pdf_46766.pdf.
39 U.S. Army, “IMCOM transforms regions into new directorates,” Public Works Digest, January 24, 2017, at
https://www.army.mil/article/181181/imcom_transforms_regions_into_new_directorates.
40 See “About Us” at the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-9 (Installations) website at https://www.acsim.army.mil/about.html.
Congressional Research Service
9

Military Construction: Authorities, Process, and Frequently Asked Questions

of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) for consolidation with those of the other services and defense
agencies into a prioritized DOD master list.
Department of the Air Force41
The Air Force Installation and Mission Support Center (AFIMSC), a subordinate unit to the Air
Force Materiel Command (AFMC), was activated in April 2015 to standardize construction and
civil engineering support across all Air Force installations.42 The center, through its headquarters
staff, detachments, and Primary Subordinate Units (PSUs), manages and oversees the Air Force’s
PPBE processes and deliverables for Installation and Mission Support capabilities previously
accomplished by the Air Force’s Major Commands (MAJCOMs) and direct reporting units.43
This includes MILCON at Air Force installations. In practice, the Air Force MAJCOMs conduct
day-to-day management of Air Force installations through their base commanders (generally the
Wing Commander at an air base). However, these commanders rely upon AFIMSC to execute
their MILCON projects. AFIMSC houses the Air Force Civil Engineer Center (AFCEC), one of
its PSUs that provides installation engineering services to Air Force installations, and is
responsible for executing the Air Force MILCON program.44 Though not technically a DOD-
designated construction agent (an approved DOD activity assigned the design or construction
execution responsibilities associated with a service’s MILCON program45), AFCEC executes
Design Manager/Construction Manager (DM/CM) roles and responsibilities similar to those of a
construction agent.46
After AFIMSC receives the prioritized project lists from installation commanders, AFIMSC
validates and consolidates projects and works to support the development of an Integrated
Priority List (IPL), including working through the Air Force Corporate Structure (AFCS), and
with the Facility Management Division of the Air Staff (AF/A4CF). The AFCS is a deliberative
body that makes recommendations on resourcing and investment to the Secretary of the Air
Force.47 AF/A4CF reviews MILCON programs and integrates Total Force (Active Air Force, Air
National Guard, Air Force Reserve) MILCON projects into a single IPL based on a pre-approved

41For more detailed information on how the Air Force manages its MILCON program, see U.S. Air Force, Program
Management Plan for Air Force MILCON Execution, AFIMSC/AFCEC, 25 September 2017, at
https://www.wbdg.org/FFC/AF/POLICY/PgMP_MILCON_HAF_AFCEC_AFIMSC_Final.pdf.
42 See AFIMSC’s website for additional information https://www.afimsc.af.mil/About-Us/Fact-
Sheets/Display/Article/559864/af-installation-mission-support-center/.
43 U.S. Air Force, Program Management Plan for Air Force MILCON Execution, AFIMSC/AFCEC, 25 September
2017, pp.4-5, https://www.wbdg.org/FFC/AF/POLICY/PgMP_MILCON_HAF_AFCEC_AFIMSC_Final.pdf.
44 Ibid, p. 5.
45 See Department of Defense, Directive 4270.5, Military Construction, at
https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodd/427005p.pdf?ver=2018-11-08-080607-280.
46 The MILDEP’s Construction Agents according to DOD Directive 4270.5 are the Naval Facilities Engineering
Command (NAVFAC) for the Navy and Marine Corps, and the Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) for the Army.
Historically, either NAVFAC or USACE have executed design and construction for the Air Force MILCON program,
but more recently AFCEC has taken on these roles and responsibilities and is designated by the Air Force as its Design
Manager/Construction Manager (DM/CM). See U.S. Air Force, Instruction (AFI) 32-1023, Designing and
Constructing Military Construction Projects, at https://static.e-publishing.af.mil/production/1/af_a4/publication/afi32-
1023/afi32-1023.pdf.
47 The Air Force Corporate Structure is a formal body consisting of civilian and military personnel from the Air Staff or
Secretariat, Core Function Lead representatives and the MAJCOMs. It is established under the Air Force Council,
which is chaired by the Vice Chief of Staff of the Air Force and the Under Secretary of the Air Force. See
Headquarters, U.S. Air Force, Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution System Training Program Reference
Manual, pp. 43-46, at http://afacpo.com/AQDocs/PPBE.pdf.
Congressional Research Service
10

Military Construction: Authorities, Process, and Frequently Asked Questions

MILCON Model and presents the MILCON program to the AFCS for approval.48 Once approved
by the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Installations, Energy, and Environment (SAF/IE)
through the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Environment, Safety and
Infrastructure (SAF/IEE), the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Budget (SAF/FMB)
finalizes the Air Force MILCON budget and submits the approved list of MILCON projects to
OSD.
Department of the Navy
The Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC) plans, builds, and maintains facilities,
and delivers environmental, utilities and other base services. NAVFAC comprises two regional
commands―NAVFAC Atlantic in Norfolk, Virginia, and NAVFAC Pacific in Pearl Harbor,
Hawaii―to which a total of nine subordinate Facilities Engineering Commands (FECs) report. 49
Each Navy shore installation (i.e., Navy base) is assigned to one of the FECs. At each base, a
Resident Officer in Charge of Construction (ROICC) overseas MILCON projects for the base and
is responsible for developing the necessary DD Form 1391s.
The NAVFAC headquarters staff reviews and prioritizes the submitted construction projects,
forwarding the resulting list to Navy Installations Command (formally “Commander, Navy
Installations Command,” or CNIC), located at the Washington Navy Yard in the District of
Columbia.50 CNIC consolidates, reviews, and reprioritizes the projects before submitting them to
the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) through the Deputy Chief of Naval Operations (Fleet
Readiness & Logistics, OPNAV N4) and more specifically the Director, Shore Readiness
Division (OPNAV N46). Upon evaluation and approval, the CNO’s staff passes the list to the
Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Energy, Installations, and Environment (ASN(EI&E)) for
submission to OSD.
Marine Corps
The Marine Corps, as a component of the Navy, has no installation engineering staff; it relies on
NAVFAC and the Navy’s ROICCs to plan and administer construction on its installations.
Nevertheless, the Marines do channel their construction requests through their own chain of
command for requirements screening and project prioritization. After installation construction
requirements are determined and the requisite DD Form 1391s are created and prioritized, they
are forwarded to the appropriate regional subordinate command of Marine Corps Installations
Command (MCICOM) for screening and consolidation.51 There, the proposed military
construction projects are reviewed, reprioritized, and forwarded to their respective Fleet Marine

48 Additional information on Air Force MILCON program and project roles and responsibilities can be found in U.S.
Air Force, Instruction (AFI) 32-1021, Planning and Programming Military Construction (MILCON) Projects, at
https://static.e-publishing.af.mil/production/1/af_a4/publication/afi32-1021/afi32-1021.pdf.
49 For a list of engineering commands by region see https://www.navfac.navy.mil/about_us.html.
50 CNIC provides oversight on all shore installation management, exercises authority as the Budget Submitting Office
for installation support, and acts as the Navy point of contact for program execution oversight and installation policy.
51 MCICOM is the single authority for all Marine Corps installations matters. It exercises command and control of
regional installation commands, establishes policy, exercises oversight and prioritizes resources in order to optimize
installation support to the operating forces, tenant commands, and Marine families. There are four regional subordinate
commands under Marine Corps Installations Command (MCICOM): the National Capital Region/Marine Corps Base
Quantico (MCINCR), Pacific (MCIPAC), East (MCIEAST) and West (MCIWEST); each is responsible for the major
Marine bases and air stations within their respective geographic areas. See
https://www.mcicom.marines.mil/Portals/57/G1%20Docs/2015%20MCICOM%20Welcome%20Package%20V2.pdf.
Congressional Research Service
11

Military Construction: Authorities, Process, and Frequently Asked Questions

Force (FMF) headquarters.52 After the FMF headquarters review, MILCON projects are submitted
to MCICOM headquarters and other oversight offices co-located within Headquarters, Marine
Corps Installations and Logistics (HQMC/I&L), in Washington, DC. There, a final prioritized list
is compiled and submitted to the ASN(EI&E) for presentation to OSD.
National Guard
The National Guard (Army and Air) is a state-based reserve component of the armed forces.53
Unless the National Guard is federalized (i.e., called to active duty according to statutory
provision), each state’s National Guard is its own distinct military organization, with the governor
as its commander in chief and The Adjutant General, or TAG, as its senior military officer.54 Each
National Guard is a joint organization under the TAG, however, Army National Guard (ARNG)
and Air National Guard (ANG) MILCON requirements are handled somewhat differently.
Army National Guard55
Within a state’s joint National Guard headquarters organization (sometimes called a Military
Department or Department of Military Affairs), the Army section of the headquarters staff
includes a Construction and Facilities Management Officer (CFMO) who administers the state’s
Military Construction Army National Guard (MCNG) program. CFMOs are the installation
engineers of the ARNG and are the principal advisors to the TAG regarding all real property,
facilities, O&M, construction, and environmental management programs.56 CFMOs conduct
Master Planning and develop a Long Range Construction Plan (LRCP); a prioritized list of the
state’s requirements for MILCON CFMOs operate under the TAG’s general guidance to assess
state facility requirements and program MILCON projects, submitting them to the TAG for
prioritization and approval. CFMOs also prepare DD Form 1391s for each MILCON project.
Following the CFMO’s review of the projects and submission to the TAG for approval, the TAG
sends a final project list (which includes the DD Form 1391s) to the National Guard Bureau
(NGB), an agency that acts as the liaison between the states’ National Guard headquarters
organizations and the Departments of the Army and Air Force.
ARNG staff within NGB (such as those in the Installations Division, or ARNG-ILI), in turn,
review the submitted MILCON projects from all jurisdictions and incorporate those with the
highest priority into an Infrastructure Requirements Plan (IRP). The IRP serves as the prioritized

52 There are two FMFs—Atlantic (FMFLANT) and Pacific (FMFPAC)—commanding the deploying Marine
Expeditionary Forces. FMFLANT is headquartered at Naval Station Norfolk, Virginia, while FMFPAC is
headquartered at Camp H.M. Smith, Hawaii.
53 For background information on the Reserve Forces, see CRS In Focus IF10540, Defense Primer: Reserve Forces, by
Lawrence Kapp, at https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF10540.
54 With the exception of the District of Colombia, territories (including Guam, U.S. Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico)
also have elected governors. For more information on federalization of the National Guard and other Reserve Forces,
see CRS In Focus IF10540, Defense Primer: Reserve Forces, by Lawrence Kapp.
55 For more detailed information on Army National Guard MILCON program development and execution, see National
Guard Regulation 415-5, Construction, Army National Guard Military Construction Program Development and
Execution, March 6, 2015, at https://www.ngbpdc.ngb.army.mil/Portals/27/Publications/ngr/ngr%20415-
5.pdf?ver=2018-09-07-082540-720.
56 Sometimes the CFMO is represented by an office within a state military department. In these cases the term CFMO
may be understood as “Construction and Facilities Management Office” rather than officer. However, per National
Guard Regulation 415-5, responsibility for ARNG MILCON lies with the state-designated officers. See Texas Military
Department CFMO example at https://tmd.texas.gov/construction-and-facilities-management-office.
Congressional Research Service
12

Military Construction: Authorities, Process, and Frequently Asked Questions

list of Army Guard MILCON projects for federal funding. The Director of the ARNG then
provides the prioritized ARNG project list to the Army Staff in the Pentagon, for review by the
DCS, G-9. From this point, the ARNG project list follows the same review and approval process
as the rest of the Army.
Air National Guard57
The Base Civil Engineers (BCEs) for each state’s ANG installations initiate MILCON projects
through a process similar to that of the ARNG. BCEs produce DD Form 1391s for each MILCON
project. The Air Staff within the state’s joint National Guard headquarters organization, compiles
and prioritizes the projects according to the TAG’s general guidance. After TAG approval, the
state’s highest priority ANG projects are sent to ANG Headquarters Air Staff within NGB for
consolidation and reprioritization. The ANG Air Staff combines and refines the list, and the
Director of the ANG provides highest priority projects to Headquarters, Air Force (HAF) staff in
the Pentagon. From that point, the project list follows the same review and approval process as
the Air Force list.
The Chief of the National Guard Bureau works with OSD throughout the programming phase to
ensure NGB priorities are given full consideration.

57 For more detailed information on Air National Guard MILCON program policies, responsibilities, and execution, see
Air National Guard Instruction 32-1023, Criteria and Standards for Air National Guard Design and Construction,
January 21, 2015, at https://www.wbdg.org/FFC/ANG/ANGI/ANGI_32-1023.pdf.
Congressional Research Service
13

Figure 1. Military Construction Process

Source: DOD information, CRS graphics.
CRS-14

Military Construction: Authorities, Process, and Frequently Asked Questions

Office of Management and Budget Review
The joint review of the DOD budget by OMB and OSD generally occurs between September and
December, and focuses on the administration’s priorities, as well as such general areas as
“program phasing and pricing, compliance with DOD funding policies, and efficient execution of
funds, based on performance metrics.”58 This review includes MILCON programs and the review
of DD Form 1391 submissions for projects proposed by OSD.
The highest priority projects that fit within the budgetary guidance provided by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) will be included in the President's request. The approved
projects assigned a lower priority are slated for funding in future years and are typically included
in the Future Years Defense Program (FYDP), which is a catalogue that summarizes the forces,
resources, and programs associated with DOD operations over a five-year period.59 Therefore,
some MILCON projects may survive the screening process only to be placed in the budgeting
queue for a future year’s submission. Conversely, because budget levels fluctuate and the entire
construction list is reviewed annually, it is also possible a MILCON project’s priority may
diminish in a later year.
Authorizations, Appropriations, and Enactment60
The annual NDAA, which originates as bills in the House and Senate armed services committees,
authorizes MILCON and provides any policy guidance, as in all other DOD policy issues.
Legislation to appropriate funding (i.e., provide the budget authority to DOD) for MILCON
originates as a bill in the Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies
subcommittees within the Committees on Appropriations for both the House and the Senate.61
Committee reports accompanying the appropriations bills may provide useful information in
addition to what is included in the bills themselves. See Figure 2.
While the committees and subcommittees exercise jurisdiction over the legislation required, they
also typically provide opportunities for individual Members of Congress not assigned to the
committees of jurisdiction to provide input regarding specific MILCON projects. During the
period when legislation is being drafted, the committees may also issue guidance for Members
wishing to submit input to the committee when considering MILCON matters. The guidance
might suggest additional documentation that could prove useful to the committee in its
deliberations, or may also set a deadline for submission of such information. Often that deadline

58 RAND Corporation, Obtaining Life-Cycle Cost-Effective Facilities in the Department of Defense, 2013, p. 14, at
https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR169.html.
59 10 U.S.C. §221 requires that the Secretary of Defense submit, at about the same time as the President’s annual
budget request, a “future-years defense program … reflecting the estimated expenditures and proposed appropriations
included in that budget. Any such future-years defense program shall cover the fiscal year with respect to which the
budget is submitted and at least the four succeeding fiscal years.” DOD develops its FYDP according to policies and
procedures outlined in Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), Department of Defense, Directive
7045.14, The Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution Process (PPBE) Process, January 25, 2013
(Incorporating Change 1, August 29, 2017). See: CRS In Focus IF10429, Defense Primer: Planning, Programming,
Budgeting and Execution (PPBE) Process, by Brendan W. McGarry and Heidi M. Peters.
60 For more information on the MILCON appropriation and obligation process, see GAO, Defense Infrastructure:
Action Needed to Increase the Reliability of Construction Cost Estimates, GAO-18-101, March 2018, at
https://www.gao.gov/assets/700/690892.pdf.
61 For general information on the federal budgeting, appropriations, and authorization processes, see CRS Report 98-
721, Introduction to the Federal Budget Process, coordinated by James V. Saturno, and CRS Report RS20371,
Overview of the Authorization-Appropriations Process, by Bill Heniff Jr.
Congressional Research Service
15

Military Construction: Authorities, Process, and Frequently Asked Questions

is set for late March, when the subcommittee staffs begin to prepare for markup of the necessary
legislation.
Figure 2. Legislative Process / Congressional Operations

Source: House and Senate committee websites, CRS Report RS21363, Legislative Procedure and Process Resources
for Congressional Staff, by Jennifer E. Manning and Maura Mul ins, CRS graphics.
MILCON Execution
After having received congressional authorization and appropriations, the responsibility for
executing and managing MILCON projects typically falls to one of the two MILDEP construction
agents or to the service’s designated DM/CM.62 However, ARNG and ANG headquarters bureaus
manage their respective MILCON projects separately.
These service-designated construction agents/managers typically hire one or more general
contractors to execute construction, where the concerned military service is not able to perform
the design or construction work themselves. Construction agent or DM/CM field engineering
offices and associated contracting offices are responsible for preparing, advertising, evaluating,
and awarding design and construction contracts. These contracts are awarded through a specific
Request for Proposal (RFP) process. 63

62 While this division of responsibility usually holds for construction within the United States, overseas construction
responsibility is typically governed by the project’s location. DOD Directive 4270.5 designates specific Construction
Agents by geographical area. Unspecified minor military construction may be executed by the secretary concerned or,
in the case of a Defense Agency or a DoD Field Activity, by the secretary concerned of the MILDEP having
jurisdiction over the real property facility.
63 For more information on the RFP process, see Step 6: Request for Proposal Preparation and Evaluation in the
Congressional Research Service
16

Military Construction: Authorities, Process, and Frequently Asked Questions

Construction encompasses several phases, including the planning and design of the project, the
solicitation of bids from prospective general contractors, and actual construction of the structure.
Normally, one of two general contracting approaches is taken, design-bid-build or design-build,
to execute a MILCON project, and the difference between these two methods will affect the type
of RFP process used.
Design-Bid-Build
Portions of Title 40 of the United States Code (§1101 et seq.) require that federal building
projects go through a three-step process, referred to as design-bid-build, with an initial design
phase, a bid for construction competition, and the actual construction. In the design-bid-build
process, each phase is executed under a specific contract. Under design-bid-build, an architectural
or engineering firm is awarded a contract for planning and designing the project. Once completed,
a new contract for construction is advertised for bidding by general contractors. These general
contractors, in turn, often solicit second and third tier subcontractor quotes for specialty items,
such as concrete work, plumbing, and electrical work before bidding for the overall construction
contract.
Design-Build
Section 2305a of Title 10 permits a DOD contracting officer to use a shorter two-step process,
called design-build, for design and construction. All planning, design, and construction is
conducted under a single contract. This requires the firms bidding on the project to have access to
all of the skills necessary to plan, design, and construct the project. This master builder concept
offers two advantages over design-bid-build: it places full responsibility for the project on a
single firm, and it offers the possibility of a reduced schedule by overlapping the project’s design
and construction phases. On the other hand, the comprehensive nature of design-build contracts
may limit the number of firms able to compete in the bidding.
Section 2305a authorizes a contracting officer to use the design-build process if he or she
determines that:
1. three or more offers are anticipated for such contract;
2. design work must be performed before an offeror can develop a proposal; and
3. the offeror will incur a substantial amount of expense in preparing the offer.
In opting to use the design-build process―rather than the design-bid-build process― section
2305a requires the contracting officer to consider relevant information, including the extent to
which the project requirements have been adequately defined, the time constraints for delivery of
the project, the capability and experience of potential contractors, and other criteria established by
the contracting agency.
From Contract Award to Construction Completion
USACE, NAVFAC, AFCEC, and ARNG/ANG state headquarters solicit the bids, award the
contracts, and provide government oversight and assistance through the project’s design, contract
award, construction, completion, and financial close-out. Early on, facility engineers work with a

RAND report: RAND Corporation, Obtaining Life-Cycle Cost-Effective Facilities in the Department of Defense, 2013,
p. 17, at https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR169.html.
Congressional Research Service
17

Military Construction: Authorities, Process, and Frequently Asked Questions

design firm to create a plan that fits within the scope of the project’s DD Form 1391.64 These
facility engineers are not permitted to enter into a contract or obligate any funds for the actual
construction of the project until associated funding is authorized and appropriated. Once project
authorization and appropriations are enacted, they may then solicit bids through the RFP process,
award the contract, and begin construction of the facility. These military engineers will continue
to manage the project and monitor construction throughout the process.
Navy Funding Example
Funds to pay for any given MILCON project typically flow along a lengthy path of allocation and
reallocation (excluding some projects performed under an emergency MILCON authority). An
example is provided below using a notional Navy MILCON project.
 Using the appropriate budget authority provided for a specified MILCON project
by Congress, OMB draws the necessary funds from the Military Construction,
Navy account at the U.S. Treasury;
 OMB then allocates the appropriated amount to OSD;
 OSD then reallocates the funds to the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Financial
Management and Comptroller);
 The ASN(FMC) passes funding to a NAVFAC regional command (Atlantic or
Pacific);
 NAVFAC continues the process by reallocating the funds from the regional
command to a subordinate FEC;
 The FEC, a regional division of the command that maintains resident engineers
and contracting officers, administers the MILCON contracts and pays the
contractors.
While a number of factors affect the amount of time required to complete a MILCON project,
projects generally span five to seven years from the time a DD Form 1391 is approved, to the date
the project is completed. MILCON appropriations are usually only available for obligation for
five fiscal years, at which time the appropriation expires (though availability of some
appropriations is extended for limited purposes).65 After five years, any unexpended MILCON
funds are canceled and returned to the U.S. Treasury. MILCON projects that do not have
continued funding through regular appropriations, but still require funding to finish construction,
may receive reprogrammed funds from other MILCON projects where the DOD component
determines there is a funding need and where funds are available, but unobligated.66

64 This initial planning and design can begin before the project itself is authorized by making use of O&M or MILCON
funds already appropriated to undifferentiated planning and design accounts (i.e., O&M “advanced planning” and
MILCON P&D).
65 GAO-18-101, Defense Infrastructure: Action Needed to Increase the Reliability of Construction Cost Estimates
(March 2018), p. 6, https://www.gao.gov/assets/700/690892.pdf.
66 For more information on DOD MILCON reprogramming authorities, see DOD Financial Management Regulation
7000.14-R, Volume 3, Chapter 7, https://comptroller.defense.gov/Portals/45/documents/fmr/Volume_03.pdf.
Congressional Research Service
18

Military Construction: Authorities, Process, and Frequently Asked Questions

Appendix A. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
1. Where are the specific military construction projects listed for a given
legislative authorization and appropriation cycle?
Projects requested by the President are listed in the detailed budget justification documentation
posted on the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) website under the “Budget Materials”
section.67
Projects recommended for approval by the House and Senate are listed in tables included in the
reports submitted by the armed services and appropriations committees accompanying their
annual bills (National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), and Military Construction, Veterans
Affairs, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, respectively). The final, consolidated list of
projects for which authorizations and appropriations are enacted can be found in the conference
reports submitted by the relevant conference committees.
2. What is a Department of Defense Form 1391 (DD Form 1391)?
Department of Defense Form 1391 (also known as DD Form 1391) is a form that originates at the
installation-level and is used by DOD as a programming document to request construction
funding from Congress. The form is used to explain each proposed construction project
individually and includes a cost estimate, description of proposed construction, requirement,
current situation, impact on operations if the project is not approved, and any useful supplemental
data. Appendix C presents an example of a completed DD Form 1391.
3. What is “planning and design” funding?
The execution of any authorized construction project proceeds through several steps. These are
intended to identify any issues and provide conceptual design including cost estimates for
construction (e.g., site preparation, facility and supporting structure design, and sequencing of
construction) and designing the anticipated facility and each of the roads, ramps, utilities, and the
like needed for its operation. These activities may be categorized by function, with planning
handled primarily by civil engineers and design handled primarily by architects. By funding
planning and design through a separate, nonspecific appropriation, the scope and costs of projects
may be accurately estimated before funds for individual construction projects are requested.
4. How long are funds available for projects?
Prior to FY2018, Congress provided the authorization of appropriations of military construction
and allowed for the obligation of such funding for up to three years.68 The FY2018 NDAA (P.L.
115-91) moved to align the period of authorization with the period of funding availability,
providing authorization of appropriations of FY2018 military construction projects for up to five
fiscal years–through October 1, 2022–and also extending authorizations provided in FY2016 and
FY2017 for five years, accordingly. The FY2019 NDAA (P.L. 115-232) also authorized military

67 See Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), “DoD Budget Request,” at http://comptroller.defense.gov/Budget-
Materials/. Summary budget documents, including the C-1 “Construction Programs” reports, are available going
forward from FY1998. Budget documentation for the Army, Navy, Air Force, Special Operations Command, and
individual agencies is also linked through each fiscal year’s listing of defense budget materials.
68 Expiration of authorization and amounts required to be specified by law for MILCON are typically provided in
section 2002 of the annual NDAA.
Congressional Research Service
19

Military Construction: Authorities, Process, and Frequently Asked Questions

construction projects and funds for up to five years. Both the House and Senate versions of the
FY2020 NDAA include language that authorizes military construction projects for five years.
5. Why does a military construction project need an authorization and a
separate appropriation for each construction project?
Section 114, of Title 10, United States Code, specifies, in part, that “No funds may be
appropriated for any fiscal year to or for the use of any armed force or obligated or expended for
... military construction ... unless funds therefore have been specifically authorized by law.” The
section goes on to define military construction as “... any construction, development, conversion,
or extension of any kind which is carried out with respect to any military facility or installation
....” Additionally, 10 U.S.C. §2802 specifies that the Secretary of Defense and the Secretaries of
the military departments may carry out such military construction projects, land acquisitions, and
defense access road projects “as are authorized by law.”
In practical application of these statutes, Congress has required project-by-project authorization
and appropriation for military construction projects.69
6. When an appropriation supports a requested military construction project,
why is the amount of the project that is disclosed in the new budget authority
sometimes greater than the actual project cost?
New budget authority requested before construction begins is an estimate of project cost using
parametric cost estimating tools, and may include cost buffers to account for unknown variables
(e.g., revised land surveys, inflation over the period of construction, etc.). The cost calculated at
completion represents the actual expenditure (i.e., the outlay). In March 2018, the Government
Accountability Office (GAO) raised concerns that DOD guidance describing the process of
developing construction cost estimates does not fully incorporate all the steps needed to develop
high-quality, reliable cost estimates.70 DOD partially concurred with the GAO recommendation,
agreeing that DOD cost estimating guidance “lacks specificity” in several areas. As a result, DOD
stated its intent to revise its cost estimating guidance beginning in FY2019.
After Congress authorizes and appropriates funds for a project, the budget authority may only be
used for specific facilities listed on the associated DD Form 1391. In cases where the budget
authority exceeds the actual cost of the project, the congressional appropriators may rescind the
remaining budget authority, or approve the reprogramming of remaining unobligated budget
authority to be applied to other military construction projects, if requested. If actual costs exceed
the project’s allocated budget authority, additional costs may be covered through reprogramming
or additional appropriations.
7. What are the “McCain Rules”?
First articulated in 1994 by Senator John McCain, the McCain Rules are criteria that were
included in the NDAA for FY1995 (P.L. 103-337, Section 2856) as a sense of the Senate:

69 For more information on authorizations and appropriations see U.S. General Accounting Office, Principals of
Federal Appropriations Law, Fourth Edition, 2016 Rev., GAO-16-464SP, March 10, 2016, p. 2-54,
https://www.gao.gov/legal/red-book/overview.
70 U.S. Government Accountability Office, Action Needed to Increase the Reliability of Construction Cost Estimates,
GAO-18-101, March 2018.
Congressional Research Service
20

Military Construction: Authorities, Process, and Frequently Asked Questions

Appropriations for any military construction project not included in the DOD annual
budget request should be considered for authorization only if the project is–
1. essential to the DOD’s national security mission;
2. consistent with past actions under the Base Realignment and Closure Act
(BRAC);
3. in the services’ Future Years Defense Program;
4. executable in the year they are authorized and appropriated; and
5. offset by reductions in other defense accounts, through advice from the
Secretary of Defense.
The McCain Rules were used as guidance for congressional consideration of Member requests
(i.e., earmarks) for military construction projects. Since Congress suspended the practice of
funding such Member requests in 2011, Congress has referred to them infrequently. DOD applies
the McCain Rules in the formulation of the annual report to Congress on unfunded priorities
required by 10 U.S.C. §222a.
8. What is the Future Years Defense Program (FYDP)?
The Future Years Defense Program (FYDP) is an annually-compiled catalogue that summarizes
the forces, resources, and programs associated with DOD operations. Formally approved by the
Secretary of Defense, the FYDP projects DOD funding, manpower, and force structure needs
over a 5-year period. The FYDP is typically completed during the programming phase of
Planning, Programing, Budgeting, and Execution (PPBE) process and is generally updated during
the budgeting phase to reflect DOD's final funding request as presented in the annual President’s
budget request.
During the programming and budgeting phases, the highest priority construction projects that fit
within the budgetary guidance provided by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) will be
included in the President's request. The approved projects assigned a lower priority are slated for
funding in future years and are generally included in the FYDP. DOD submits the FYDP to the
congressional committees with jurisdiction over defense matters. Note that while the overall data
structure of the FYDP is unclassified, detailed programmatic data is classified.71
9. Why are certain military construction projects listed in the FYDP ultimately
not included in the President’s budget request?
Individual projects are prioritized by factors such as relevance to military operations and training,
environmental rules, and service member’s quality of life. A newly identified requirement may be
assessed as having a higher priority than projects already in the PPBE process. Therefore, some
construction, while justifiable, may be deferred to later years.

71 For additional information on the FYDP, see CRS In Focus IF10831, Defense Primer: Future Years Defense
Program (FYDP), by Brendan W. McGarry and Heidi M. Peters. For more information on the PPBE, see CRS In Focus
IF10429, Defense Primer: Planning, Programming, Budgeting and Execution (PPBE) Process, by Brendan W.
McGarry and Heidi M. Peters.
Congressional Research Service
21

link to page 28 link to page 28 link to page 28 link to page 28 link to page 28
Appendix B. Selected Statutes Governing Military Construction and Repair
Authorities
Table B-1. Summary of Selected Military Construction and Repair Authorities
Authorities
Criteria
Limitations
Congressional Reporting
Waiting
Source Of Funding
Requirement
Period
Unspecified Minor
MILCON project <= $6M (not to
Total may not exceed
If project costs > $2M,
14 days from
Unspecified minor
Construction0
be used for new construction of
125% of amounts
congressional notification is
notification
military construction
(10 U.S.C. §2805)
family housing units)
authorized for
required
appropriations
unspecified minor

military constructionb
If project costs <= $2M,

O&M appropriations may
If project costs > $750K,
be used
advance approval by
Secretary concerned is
required

Laboratory
MILCON project for the purpose
As per10 U.S.C.
Upon determination of use
14 days from
Unspecified minor
Revitalizationc
of revitalization and
§2805(b), if project costs
notification
MILCON appropriations,
(10 U.S.C. §2805(d))
recapitalization of DOD “test and
> $750K, advance
O&M appropriations, or
evaluation activities” and
approval by Secretary
amounts appropriated

“research, engineering and
concerned is requiredd
under 10 U.S.C. §2363e
development centers” <= $6M

As per 10 U.S.C.
§2805(a), may not
exceed 125% of
amounts authorized for
unspecified minor
military construction.

CRS-22

link to page 28
Authorities
Criteria
Limitations
Congressional Reporting
Waiting
Source Of Funding
Requirement
Period
Repair of Facilities Restoration of a real property
Construction of new
If project costs >$7.5M,
None
O&M appropriations
(10 U.S.C. §2811)
facility, system, or component so
facilities or additions to
congressional notification required:
it may effectively be used for its
existing facilities
1) Justification and total cost of
designated functional purpose;
prohibited
all phases;
or
If project costs > $7.5M,
2) Explanation if cost is >75% of
Conversion of a real property
advance approval by
MILCON cost to replace the
facility, system, or component to
Secretary concerned is
facility; and
a new functional purpose without
required
3) Description of any MILCON
increasing its external dimensions

elements to be incorporated into
project
Architectural and
Architectural and engineering
None (subject to
If services cost >$1M, congressional
14 days from
MILCON and Family
Engineering
services, as well as construction
appropriations)
notification required
notification
Housing appropriations
Services and
design performed in connection
Construction
with MILCON and family housing
Design
projectsb
(10 U.S.C. §2807)
Contingency
Deferral of the project for
None (subjection to
Upon determination
7 days from
Contingency construction
Construction
inclusion in the next MILCON
appropriations)
of use
notification
appropriations
(10 U.S.C. §2804)
authorization act would be
“inconsistent with national
security or national interest”
Emergency
Vital to the national security or to Total may not exceed
Upon determination
5 days from
Unobligated MILCON
Construction
the protection of health, safety,
$50M per fiscal year (for of use
notification
appropriations available
(10 U.S.C. §2803)
or the quality of the environment; each Secretary
to the Secretary
and
concerned)
concerned
So urgent that deferral of the
project for inclusion in the next
MILCON authorization act would
be inconsistent with national
security or the protection of
health, safety, or environmental
quality
CRS-23

Authorities
Criteria
Limitations
Congressional Reporting
Waiting
Source Of Funding
Requirement
Period
Construction if
Declaration of war, or declaration None
Upon determination
None
Available (unobligated)
War is Declared
of a national emergency by the

of use
MILCON funding
(10 U.S.C. §2808)
President in accordance with the
National Emergencies Act (50
U.S.C. 1601 et. seq.) requiring use
of the armed forces
Project “necessary to support the
use of such armed forces”
Authority terminates “at the end
of the war or national
emergency”
Source: Title 10 of the United States Code, Congressional Research Service.

a. Through FY2022, the Secretary concerned is required to adjust the dol ar limitations specified in 10 U.S.C. §2805 (Unspecified minor construction) for unspecified
minor military construction projects inside the United States to reflect the area construction cost index for military construction projects (not to exceed $10M).
b. Includes projects undertaken in connection with the authority provided under 10 U.S.C. § 2854 (Restoration or replacement of damaged or destroyed facilities).
c. Authority under this subsection expires Sept 30, 2025.
d. Includes amounts obligated for laboratory revitalization under 10 U.S.C. §2805(d).
e. 10 U.S.C. §2363 provides authority for the director of a defense laboratory to use not less than two percent, and not more than four percent, of all funds available
to the laboratory for specified purposes, including repair or minor military construction of the laboratory infrastructure and equipment.
CRS-24

Military Construction: Authorities, Process, and Frequently Asked Questions

Appendix C. Example DD Form 1391: Presidential
Aircraft Recapitalization Complex
Included in the figures below is the DD Form 1391 for the Presidential Aircraft Recapitalization
(PAR) Complex program, submitted to Congress by the U.S. Air Force (USAF) in their MILCON
Program Fiscal Year 2020 Budget Estimates document.72
According to USAF, the “purpose of the PAR Program at Joint Base Andrews is to base the
[Boeing] 747-8 [aircraft] with suitable facilities at Joint Base Andrews and to operate the aircraft
as the replacement to the existing VC-25A fleet of aircraft, which entails constructing a multi-bay
hangar and associated facilities to house and maintain the aircraft.”73 The VC-25A aircraft are a
fleet of two specially configured Boeing 747-200B's that provide air transport for the President of
the United States.74 These aircraft are more commonly known as “Air Force One” when the
President is aboard either one. USAF claims existing facilities at Joint Base Andrews do not
currently meet the basing and operational requirements of the larger replacement 747-8.75
The complete DD Form 1391 for this MILCON project consists of five pages, and includes cost
estimates, a description of the proposed construction, USAF’s requirements/justifications for the
project, a joint use certification statement, and other supplemental data.

72 See Department of the Air Force, Military Construction Program Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 Budget Estimates, March
2019,
https://www.saffm.hq.af.mil/Portals/84/documents/FY20/MILCON/COMBINED%20FY2020%20MILCON%20and%
20MFH%20J-Book%2019%20March%202019.pdf?ver=2019-03-20-120911-810.
73 U.S. Air Force, “Presidential Aircraft Recapitalization Environmental Impact Statement,” PAR Program EIS website,
cached October 24, 2019,
https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:wk3BUHB3tPcJ:https://parprogrameis.com/+&cd=2&hl=en
&ct=clnk&gl=us.
74 U.S. Air Force, “VC-25 - Air Force One,” accessed October 25, 2019, https://www.af.mil/About-Us/Fact-
Sheets/Display/Article/104588/vc-25-air-force-one/.
75 U.S. Air Force, “Project Information,” PAR Program EIS website, cached October 12, 2019,
https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:bewwBv2dTBIJ:https://parprogrameis.com/node/1+&cd=3&
hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us.
Congressional Research Service
25

Figure C-1. Presidential Aircraft Recapitalization Complex DD Form 1391
(First page; page 53)

Source: Department of the Air Force, Military Construction Program Fiscal Year 2020 Budget Estimates.
CRS-26

Military Construction: Authorities, Process, and Frequently Asked Questions

Figure C-2. Presidential Aircraft Recapitalization Complex DD Form 1391
(Second page; page 54)

Source: Department of the Air Force, Military Construction Program Fiscal Year 2020 Budget Estimates.
Congressional Research Service
27

Military Construction: Authorities, Process, and Frequently Asked Questions

Figure C-3. Presidential Aircraft Recapitalization Complex DD Form 1391
(Third page; page 55)

Source: Department of the Air Force, Military Construction Program Fiscal Year 2020 Budget Estimates.
Congressional Research Service
28

Military Construction: Authorities, Process, and Frequently Asked Questions

Figure C-4. Presidential Aircraft Recapitalization Complex DD Form 1391
(Fourth page; page 56)

Source: Department of the Air Force, Military Construction Program Fiscal Year 2020 Budget Estimates.
Congressional Research Service
29

Military Construction: Authorities, Process, and Frequently Asked Questions

Figure C-5. Presidential Aircraft Recapitalization Complex DD Form 1391
(Fifth page; page 57)

Source: Department of the Air Force, Military Construction Program Fiscal Year 2020 Budget Estimates.
Congressional Research Service
30

Military Construction: Authorities, Process, and Frequently Asked Questions

Congressional Research Service
31

Military Construction: Authorities, Process, and Frequently Asked Questions

Author Information

G. James Herrera

Analyst in U.S. Defense Readiness and Infrastructure

Acknowledgments
This report was originally produced by former CRS Specialist Lynn M. Williams. It has been revised and
updated to reflect current policy, practice, and law.

Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan
shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and
under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other
than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in
connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not
subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in
its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or
material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to
copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.

Congressional Research Service
R44710 · VERSION 7 · UPDATED
32