Updated May 16, 2019 Army Corps of Engineers: FY2020 Appropriations Congress generally funds the civil works activities of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) in annual Energy and Water Development appropriations acts. These activities include planning and construction of water resource projects and operation and maintenance of infrastructure and navigation improvements managed by USACE (e.g., navigation channels). For USACE civil works, President Trump requested $5.0 billion for FY2020, inclusive of a May 13, 2019, amendment to the President’s request. As shown in Figure 1, Congress typically funds USACE above the President’s request for the year (e.g., $7.0 billion for FY2019). This In Focus is a primer on the USACE appropriations process for FY2020. For more information on USACE funding, see CRS Report R45326, Army Corps of Engineers Annual and Supplemental Appropriations: Issues for Congress. reduction construction projects with benefit-cost ratios (BCRs) greater than 2.5 to 1 (i.e., benefits are at least two and a half times project costs) or projects that address safety concerns. Many congressionally authorized USACE projects do not have BCRs that meet the Administration’s 2.5 BCR threshold for budget development. Figure 2. USACE Account Funding, FY2013-FY2020 (nominal $ in billions) Figure 1. Annual USACE Funding, FY2006-FY2020 (nominal $ in billions) Source: CRS. Notes: Req = Budget request. ASA = Assistant Secretary of the Army. Regulatory = Permit program for nonfederal activities affecting regulated waters and wetlands. FUSRAP = Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program. FY2020 request proposes to transfer FUSRAP to Department of Energy. FY2020 request renews an FY2019 proposal to create two new navigation-related accounts. The figure shows funding for FY2020 in traditional USACE accounts. Source: Congressional Research Service (CRS). USACE Funding and FY2020 Request Unlike federal agencies that distribute funds by formula or through competitive grant programs, USACE directly engages in project planning and construction. It uses most of its appropriations for work on specific studies and projects authorized by Congress. These activities are often cost shared with nonfederal project sponsors or users. The FY2020 request prioritizes maintaining performance of existing infrastructure, as reflected by the share of funds requested for operations and maintenance (O&M; see Figure 2). The request would initiate no new studies or construction projects (referred to as new starts). In response to similar requests in recent years, Congress has required USACE to start a specified number of new construction projects and new studies (e.g., five projects and six studies using FY2019 appropriations). The FY2020 request also seeks to limit funding to ongoing navigation and flood risk Since the 112th Congress, earmark moratorium policies have limited directed congressional funding of site-specific projects (i.e., congressionally directed spending or earmarks). In recent years, Congress has provided additional funding for categories of USACE work. For example, in FY2019, Congress provided $2.0 billion in additional funding for 25 categories of USACE activities. After Congress enacts USACE’s appropriations, the Administration develops a work plan for the fiscal year. In the work plan, the Administration identifies the authorized USACE projects receiving the additional funding. Selected FY2020 Topics of Deliberation Navigation Funding Receipts from federal taxes on navigation interests are deposited into two trust funds—the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund (HMTF) and the Inland Waterways Trust Fund (IWTF). The trust funds are used in the discretionary appropriations process to pay for some USACE navigation activities. In FY2019, USACE funding for its navigation- https://crsreports.congress.gov Army Corps of Engineers: FY2020 Appropriations related activities is expected to reach $3.3 billion. The FY2020 request is for $2.3 billion. The FY2020 request proposed establishing a USACE budget account for the HMTF and IWTF to directly fund USACE projects (rather than the current practice of having USACE be reimbursed for eligible HMTF and IWTF expenses). The HMTF receives receipts from the Harbor Maintenance Tax (HMT) imposed on importers and domestic shippers using coastal and Great Lakes ports. Harbor O&M appropriations have not kept pace with HMT collections, resulting in a $9 billion HMTF balance. The Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (WRRDA 2014; P.L. 113-121) adopted spending targets for harbor maintenance based on a percentage of HMT receipts. Stakeholders and policymakers continue to discuss options and proposals for how to manage the HMTF balance and more closely align HMT collections and HMTF spending. The FY2020 USACE request proposes to use almost $1.0 billion in HMTF funds. The WRRDA 2014 target for FY2020 is estimated at roughly $1.2 billion. For inland waterways, the federal government pays for most O&M. Most inland waterway construction and major rehabilitation costs are shared by the federal government (50%) and commercial users through the IWTF (50%). Availability of IWTF funds has at times constrained spending on waterway construction. IWTF monies derive primarily from a fuel tax on commercial vessels on designated federal waterways. In P.L. 113-295, Congress authorized a $0.09 per gallon increase in the fuel tax. This change increased collections above $100 million (e.g., $115 million was collected in FY2018). The FY2020 request is for $55.5 million in IWTF spending for waterway construction. In the FY2020 request, the Administration also proposes applying an annual user fee on inland waterway commercial vessels to be used for waterway construction and for 10% of waterway O&M. Ecosystem Restoration and Flood Risk Reduction The President’s May 2019 amendment to the FY2020 budget request increased restoration funding for the Everglades from $69 million to $205 million. The amendment brought the request’s FY2020 total for USACE aquatic ecosystem restoration efforts to $324 million. The FY2019 work plan designates $448 million for ecosystem restoration, including $111 million for the Everglades. Recently, Congress has provided more funding for USACE’s flood risk reduction projects through supplemental appropriations than through annual appropriations. For example, the Bipartisan Budget of Act of 2018 (P.L. 115-123) provided $15 billion in emergency supplemental appropriations for construction of USACE flood risk reduction projects in qualifying states and territories. Of the FY2019 annual appropriations provided by Congress, USACE is using $2.0 billion for flood risk reduction, of which $1.0 billion is for construction. The FY2020 request for flood risk reduction is $1.0 billion, of which $0.2 billion would be for construction. Continuing Authorities Programs Congress has consistently funded eight Continuing Authorities Programs (CAPs) for USACE to plan and construct projects of limited scope and cost (e.g., $66 million in FY2019). The President’s FY2020 budget request proposes $4 million in aggregate for four CAPs, with no funding requested for four of the commonly appropriated CAPs (see CRS In Focus IF11106, Army Corps of Engineers: Continuing Authorities Programs). Construction Backlog and Upcoming Projects A persistent challenge for USACE is how to address its backlog of $98 billion in authorized USACE construction activities. A question for policymakers is whether—and, if so, how—to advance projects in the backlog. The size of the backlog is determined in part by the level of appropriations and in part by additional project authorizations. USACE is currently planning multiple projects that may cost billions to construct. For example, in the October 2018 draft feasibility study for the Coastal Texas Protection and Restoration project, USACE estimates the project’s construction cost to be between $23 billion and $32 billion. A February 2019 interim report for the New York/New Jersey Harbor and Tributaries study to reduce coastal storm risk in and near New York City includes alternatives with construction costs ranging from $12 billion to $100 billion. Other ongoing studies of largescale projects include the Great Lakes and Mississippi River Interbasin Study to control aquatic nuisance species in the Midwest (principally the Asian carp). The scale of the investments required to accomplish the authorized projects and the projects being studied may further challenge the current approach to federal participation in water resource projects. Nonfederal project sponsors and federal policymakers are exploring options for project financing and for sharing costs and responsibilities among project sponsors and beneficiaries. Alternative Financing and Delivery Recent Congresses have authorized enhanced nonfederal and private participation in USACE projects. Congress has expanded the agency’s authorities to reimburse or credit nonfederal project sponsors for nonfederal work completed on authorized projects. In addition to post-construction reimbursement, Congress in Section 1043 of WRRDA 2014 authorized the transfer of federal funds to nonfederal entities to use for the construction of authorized USACE projects. The FY2020 request proposes to transfer $150 million to these entities. It also proposes to accelerate project construction by applying $150 million in federal funds in conjunction with excess or advanced funding by nonfederal entities. Similar to recent years, the FY2020 request does not propose USACE funding for water resource projects financed under the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act, authorized by Congress in WRRDA 2014. Congress has directed the agency to develop the structure for the program. However, it is not yet operational. The 116th Congress’s consideration of water resource project financing and delivery may occur during deliberations on USACE appropriations and authorization legislation as well as during discussions of broader infrastructure initiatives. https://crsreports.congress.gov Army Corps of Engineers: FY2020 Appropriations Anna E. Normand, Analyst in Natural Resources Policy Nicole T. Carter, Specialist in Natural Resources Policy IF11137 Disclaimer This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF11137 · VERSION 2 · UPDATED