link to page 1  link to page 1  link to page 1  link to page 1 


 
 
February 4, 2019
Foodborne Illnesses and Outbreaks from Fresh Produce
The produce industry continues to be associated with a 
ranged from about 30 to 60 per year and sickened from 900 
series of foodborne illness outbreaks across multiple U.S. 
to nearly 3,000 people annually (1998-2016) (Figure 1). 
states and Canada, resulting in hundreds of illnesses and 
Leafy greens, a subset of the produce category, accounted 
hospitalizations, as well as kidney failure and death in some 
for between 20% and 40% of these reported outbreaks and 
cases. Many in Congress have expressed concern that 
10% to 40% of all produce-related illnesses (1998-2016). 
foodborne illness outbreaks are continuing to occur despite 
Over this period, single and multistate outbreaks associated 
ongoing regulatory oversight by the Food and Drug 
with leafy greens ranged from about 10 to 20 per year and 
Administration (FDA) and state public health authorities 
sickened between 100 and 1,100 annually (Figure 2).  
and given the enhanced authorities and resources provided 
to food safety officials following the enactment of 
Figure 1. Foodborne Illness Outbreaks, All Produce 
comprehensive food safety legislation as part of the FDA 
Food Safety Modernization Act in 2010 (FSMA, P.L. 111-
353). FSMA req;llllloluired the development and 
implementation of produce safety standards for certain 
fruits and vegetables, among other regulatory actions. 
Foodborne Illnesses Linked to Produce 
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 
defines a “foodborne disease outbreak” as occurring when 
two or more people get the same illness from the same 
contaminated food or drink. Based on previous CDC 
outbreak investigations, microbial hazards associated with 
 
fruits and vegetables include pathogenic (disease-causing) 
strains of Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC), 
Figure 2. Foodborne Illness Outbreaks, Leafy Greens 
Salmonella, Norovirus or Norwalk-like virus, and Listeria 
monocytogenes. Other produce-related hazards have 
involved Vibrio, Shigella, Cryptosporidium, Giardia, 
Cyclospora, Toxoplasma gondii, and Hepatitis A virus. 
Microbial hazards may be introduced through agricultural 
and processing water (used in production or transported via 
runoff), soil amendments (such as manure and municipal 
biosolids), worker hygiene, field and packing facility 
sanitation, and produce transportation and distribution. 
During the last three years (2016-2018), FDA, CDC, and 
state and local officials have investigated several multistate 
 
outbreaks involving leafy greens, salad mix, sprouts, 
Source: CRS from NORS data, https://www.cdc.gov/nors/index.html. 
cucumbers, papaya, frozen strawberries, prepared fresh and 
Produce includes fruits, nuts (excluding peanuts), vegetables, sprouts, 
root crops, and herbs. Leafy greens is a subset of al  produce and 
frozen vegetables, pre-cut melons, pistachios, and dried 
includes al  lettuce, greens, and cabbage (excluding sprouts). 
coconut. Norovirus, Salmonella, and E. coli are among the 
Notes: Includes confirmed and suspected cases across reported 
leading cause of illnesses linked to produce. Multiple 
single and multistate outbreaks and al  attributed causes and settings 
foodborne illness and outbreak investigations involved E. 
(restaurants and institutions, e.g., schools, hospitals, and prisons). 
coli O157:H7 illnesses that were linked to leafy greens. Of 
these, one was linked to romaine lettuce grown in 
Analysis by the Center for Science in the Public Interest, a 
California, and another was linked to romaine lettuce grown 
public health advocacy group, indicates that foodborne 
in Arizona. Other investigations involved E. coli linked to 
illness outbreaks associated with produce were more 
leafy greens (not traced back to a common supplier) and 
common and sickened more people than any other food 
involved Listeria monocytogenes linked to packaged salad.  
category. A 2008 United Nations study ranks leafy greens 
as the “highest priority” in terms of microbiological hazards 
Figure 1 and Figure 2 show reported outbreak and illness 
within the fruit and vegetable category. This ranking is 
trends for all produce and a subset of produce for leafy 
based on the sheer number of outbreaks and the types of 
greens based on data from the CDC’s National Outbreak 
microbial hazard associated with leafy greens, but it also 
Reporting System (NORS). These data indicate the number 
reflects the size and scale of production and trade in leafy 
of single and multistate outbreaks associated with produce 
greens. Other factors include the diversity and complexity 
of production of leafy greens and potential for amplification 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
Foodborne Illnesses and Outbreaks from Fresh Produce 
of foodborne pathogens through the food chain due to 
mushrooms, sprouts, peanuts, tree nuts, and herbs. FDA 
certain post-harvest activities (e.g., whether packaged in-
estimates that the regulation covers as many as 40,000 
field or pre-cut and bagged). Available information tracked 
domestic produce farms and nearly 15,000 foreign farms. 
by CDC as part of its Foodborne Diseases Active 
Foods not covered by regulation include foods that are 
Surveillance Network indicate that, across all food groups, 
rarely consumed raw (listed at 21 CFR 112.2(a)(1)), foods 
infections caused by certain STEC infections have been 
that go to commercial processing, foods produced for 
decreasing, while the incidence of Salmonella infections 
personal consumption, and certain foods identified as low 
has not changed significantly. Making such generalizations, 
risk. Produce that undergoes certain commercial processing, 
however, is often complicated by differences in laboratory 
such as bagged salads and leafy greens, are further covered 
testing methods and/or differences depending on the strain 
by FDA’s rule on preventive controls affecting food 
of a microorganism. 
facilities (§103). Other FSMA requirements affecting on-
farm activities include facility registration, inspection, and 
FDA Standards for Produce Safety 
records access. Certain qualified farms and facilities are 
FSMA amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act 
exempt from regulation depending on business size, among 
(21 U.S.C. §§301 et seq.), which governs foods under 
other factors. 
FDA’s jurisdiction. Under FSMA, FDA has developed and 
Deadlines for complying with FDA’s produce rule are 
implemented mandatory food safety and traceability 
being phased in over time and vary depending on the crop 
requirements for farmers, packers, and processors of 
and farm size. In some cases, FDA has granted more time 
domestically produced and imported products. Selected 
to some farms to implement and comply with certain 
provisions that broadly address produce are shown in the 
requirements. For example, in September 2017, FDA 
text box. 
proposed to extend the compliance deadline for agricultural 
Selected FSMA Provisions Related to Produce 
water testing because of concerns about the feasibility and 
cost involved (82 Federal Register 42963). Under the 
Inspections of Records (§101) 
extension, larger farms have until 2022 to comply with the 
  Allows FDA to inspect records related to the “manufacture, 
rule’s water requirements, while small and very small farms 
processing, packing, distribution, receipt, holding, or 
importation” of certain food and feed. 
have until 2023 and 2024, respectively, to comply. 
Registration of Food Facilities (§102)  
FSMA also addresses food traceability (§204). Traceability 
  Requires that food facilities be subject to biennial registration 
refers to the ability to fully trace the movement of food and 
renewal. Provides that FDA may suspend a facility’s registration 
in certain cases. 
ingredients through each specific stage of production, 
processing, and distribution and to be able to identify the 
Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based Preventive Controls 
(§103) 
origin of food and ingredients when a food or finished 
  Requires FDA to establish mandatory preventive controls for 
product is found to be unsafe. Full traceability often 
food facilities except for “small” and “very small” businesses. 
requires extensive recordkeeping and/or other types of 
Standards for Produce Safety (§105) 
traceback mechanisms. FSMA required FDA to establish 
  Requires FDA to establish mandatory minimum standards for 
pilot projects and improve its capacity to effectively and 
the safe production and harvesting of fruits and vegetables 
rapidly track and trace foods in the event of an outbreak. 
except for “small” and “very small” businesses. 
FSMA also required FDA to designate high-risk foods that 
Targeting of Inspection Resources (§201) 
require additional recordkeeping to protect public health. 
  Requires FDA to identify high-risk facilities, increase the 
FDA’s pilot projects were completed in 2012. However, 
frequency of inspection of domestic and foreign facilities, 
FDA has not yet identified or established enhanced 
identify and conduct inspections at ports of entry, and improve 
recordkeeping requirements for high-risk foods. 
inter-agency coordination and cooperation. 
Tracking and Tracing Food, Records (§204) 
Considerations for Congress 
  Requires FDA to establish pilot projects to improve traceability 
As foodborne illness outbreaks continue to occur, some 
of foods and to establish additional recordkeeping requirements  continue to question the effectiveness of FDA’s food safety 
for certain “high-risk foods.”  
regime. Regarding lapses in produce safety, some advocacy 
Surveillance (§205) 
groups point to FDA’s repeated delays in fully 
  Requires CDC to enhance foodborne il ness surveillance 
implementing key FSMA produce standards, including 
systems and to conduct an assessment of state and local food 
postponing compliance with the rule’s water quality testing 
safety and defense capacities.  
requirements, as a contributing factor. Some groups further 
For more information, see CRS Report R43724, Implementation of 
blame FDA for not fully implementing FSMA’s traceability 
the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA, P.L. 111-353). 
requirements, especially regarding high-risk foods. Critics 
also continue to cite the agency’s low rates of inspection 
At the farm production level, FSMA principally affects 
and enforcement of FDA-regulated farms and food 
produce growers by directing FDA to establish produce 
facilities. Others claim that FDA has not been provided 
safety standards (§105). FDA finalized its produce safety 
with the resources to hire the additional inspectors that are 
regulation in 2015 (80 Federal Register 74353). FDA’s 
needed to fully implement and adequately enforce the 
produce rule addresses certain identified routes of potential 
produce standards. Still others point to a possible lack of 
contamination, covering water and soil amendments used in 
coordination between FDA and state and local authorities, 
production, domesticated and wild animal intrusions in 
which often bear most of the responsibility for inspecting 
production area, worker training and hygiene, and 
farms and food facilities within their jurisdictions. 
equipment and sanitation practices used in production. The 
Renée Johnson, Specialist in Agricultural Policy  
regulation covers fruits and vegetables (including mixes), 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
Foodborne Illnesses and Outbreaks from Fresh Produce 
 
IF11092
 
 
Disclaimer 
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to 
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. 
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has 
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the 
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be 
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include 
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you 
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 
 
https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF11092 · VERSION 2 · NEW