link to page 1 
Updated November 13, 2018
Defense Primer: RDT&E
Advanced technology plays a critical role in ensuring U.S.
fund. Congress establishes transfer funds for a particular
national security. To maintain technological superiority on
purpose, and may authorize DOD to transfer a portion of
the battlefield, the Department of Defense (DOD) relies on
these funds to other accounts, such as RDT&E, to help
scientific and technical knowledge developed in large
achieve that purpose.
measure through research, development, test, and
evaluation (RDT&E) funded by the department and
Defense Appropriations Act Titles That Fund RDT&E
performed by industry, universities, federal laboratories,
and others. DOD also relies increasingly on technology
Title IV: Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation
developed by the private sector for commercial markets.
Army
This In Focus describes DOD’s RDT&E appropriations
Navy
structure and funding levels.
Air Force
Defense-wide
DOD appropriations are provided annually through the
Operational Test and Evaluation
defense appropriations act, one of the 12 regular
Title V: Revolving and Management Funds
appropriations acts that provide most of the discretionary
National Defense Sealift Fund
funding for operation of the federal government. DOD
Title VI: Other Defense Programs
RDT&E funding is generally provided in four of this act’s
Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction
titles (see box). Congress also sometimes provides DOD
Defense Health Program
RDT&E funding through supplemental appropriations acts.
Inspector General
Congress appropriated a total of $99.1 billion for DOD
Title IX: Overseas Contingency Operations
RDT&E for FY2019 in the Defense Appropriations Act,
Any of the above
2019, included as Division A of the Department of Defense
Transfer Funds
and Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education
Appropriations Act, 2019 and Continuing Appropriations
RDT&E by Character of Work
Act, 2019 (P.L. 115-245).
While DOD Title IV funds are appropriated only by
RDT&E by Organization
organization, DOD budget justifications and congressional
appropriations reports and explanatory statements also
RDT&E Appropriations Under Title IV
typically describe this funding by the character of the work
to be performed. This characterization consists of seven
Approximately 97% of DOD’s RDT&E funding is
categories, each with a budget activity code (6.1 through
appropriated in Title IV (Research, Development, Test, and
6.7) and a description. (See Table 1.)
Evaluation), which includes appropriations for the Army,
Navy, Air Force, a Defense-wide RDT&E account, and the
Table 1. DOD RDT&E Budget Activity Codes
Director of Operational Test and Evaluation. The Defense-
wide account includes the Missile Defense Agency (MDA),
Code Description
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA),
6.1
Basic Research
Office of the Secretary of Defense, and 15 other DOD
organizations. Within each of these accounts are program
6.2
Applied Research
elements (PEs) that provide funding for particular activities
6.3
Advanced Technology Development
(e.g., night vision technology, aviation survivability).
6.4
Adv. Component Development and Prototypes
RDT&E Under Other Titles
6.5
System Development and Demonstration
RDT&E funds are also appropriated for programs in other
6.6
RDT&E Management Support
titles of the defense appropriations act. For example,
RDT&E funds are sometimes appropriated as part of the
6.7
Operational Systems Development
National Defense Sealift Fund in Title V and as part of the
Source: Department of Defense, Financial Management Regulation
Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction Program and
(DoD 7000.14-R), Volume 2B, November 2017.
Defense Health Program in Title VI.
Funding in codes 6.1 to 6.3 is referred to by DOD as the
In some years, RDT&E funds have also been appropriated
science and technology (S&T) budget. This portion of DOD
in Title IX as part of DOD’s funding for Overseas
RDT&E is often singled out for attention by analysts, as it
Contingency Operations (OCO). Typically, the RDT&E
is seen as the pool of knowledge necessary for the
funds appropriated for OCO activities support specified PEs
development of future military systems. In contrast, 6.4,
in Title IV, though they are requested and accounted for
6.5, and 6.7 funds are focused on the application of existing
separately. Alternatively, they may be provided to a transfer
scientific and technical knowledge to meet current or near-
https://crsreports.congress.gov
link to page 2 link to page 2 link to page 2 
Defense Primer: RDT&E
term operational needs. The funds in 6.6 are for RDT&E
Figure 3 illustrates FY2019 Title IV and Title IX (OCO)
management and support work in any of the other RDT&E
RDT&E funding by character of work. DOD S&T funding
budget accounts. Within the S&T program, basic research
(6.1-6.3) accounted for $16.0 billion (16.6%) of this
(6.1) receives special attention, particularly by the nation’s
funding. RDT&E funds provided in other DOD
universities. DOD spends nearly half of its basic research
appropriations titles and supplemental acts are not included
budget at universities, and accounts for a substantial source
in this analysis as they are not parsed by character of work.
of federal funds for university basic research in certain
fields, such as civil (44%), electrical (35%), mechanical
Figure 3. RDT&E by Character of Work, FY2019
(32%), and chemical (29%) engineering.
Total obligational authority, in billions of current dollars
Funding Profile of DOD RDT&E
Total DOD RDT&E for FY2019 is $99.1 billion, of which
Title IV funding accounts for 96.1%. (See Figure 1.)
Figure 1. Title IV as a Share of Total RDT&E, FY2019
Source: CRS analysis of Division A, Department of Defense
Appropriations Act, 2019, Department of Defense and Labor, Health
and Human Services, and Education Appropriations Act, 2019, and
Continuing Appropriations Act, 2019 (P.L. 115-245) and H.Rept. 115-
952.
Note: Includes Title IV and Title IX funding in P.L. 115-245; does not
include undistributed DARPA reduction of $40 million.
Source: CRS analysis of Division A, Department of Defense
Relevant Statutes
Appropriations Act, 2019, Department of Defense and Labor, Health
Title 10, U.S. Code, Chapter 139—Research and
and Human Services, and Education Appropriations Act, 2019, and
Development
Continuing Appropriations Act, 2019 (P.L. 115-245) and H.Rept. 115-
Title 10, U.S. Code, Chapter133—Under Secretary of
952.
Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics
FY2019 RDT&E provided by Title IV and Title IX (OCO)
Title 10, U.S. Code, Chapter138(b)(8)—Assistant Secretaries
is $96.1 billion. The composition of this funding by
of Defense–Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and
organization is shown in Figure 2.
Engineering)
Figure 2. Title IV and Title IX (OCO) RDT&E by
Organization, FY2019
CRS Products
CRS Report R45150, Federal Research and Development (R&D)
Funding: FY2019, coordinated by John F. Sargent Jr.
CRS Report R44711, Department of Defense Research,
Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E): Appropriations
Structure, by John F. Sargent Jr.
CRS Report R44010, Defense Acquisitions: How and Where
DOD Spends Its Contracting Dollars, by Moshe Schwartz, John F.
Sargent Jr., and Christopher T. Mann
Other Resources
Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), DOD Budget
Request
Department of Defense Research, Development, Test, and
Evaluation Programs (R-1) Amendment, FY2019
Source: CRS analysis of Division A, Department of Defense
Appropriations Act, 2019, Department of Defense and Labor, Health
and Human Services, and Education Appropriations Act, 2019, and
Continuing Appropriations Act, 2019 (P.L. 115-245) and H.Rept. 115-
John F. Sargent Jr., Specialist in Science and Technology
952.
Policy
IF10553
https://crsreports.congress.gov
Defense Primer: RDT&E
Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress.
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.
https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF10553 · VERSION 7 · UPDATED