
 
Updated February 26, 2018
U.S. Sanctions on Russia Related to the Ukraine Conflict
Background 
constitute a threat to U.S. national security. The United 
Since 2014, the United States has imposed sanctions on 
States, in coordination with the European Union and others, 
over 600 individuals, entities, and vessels in response to 
promised to impose increasing costs on Russia until it 
Russia’s invasion and annexation of Ukraine’s Crimea 
“abides by its international obligations and returns its 
region and Russia’s subsequent support of separatists in 
military forces to their original bases and respects Ukraine’s 
eastern Ukraine. President Barack Obama, in initiating 
sovereignty and territorial integrity.” The Department of the 
economic sanctions on Russia, declared that Russia’s 
Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) 
activities in Ukraine threaten the peace, security, stability, 
continues to investigate transactions and designate 
sovereignty, and territorial integrity of its neighbor and 
individuals and entities, most recently in January 2018.
Table 1. U.S. Ukraine-Related Sanctions on Russia: Authorities, Targeted Behavior, and Treasury Designees 
Authority 
Targeted Behavior 
Designations (as of 2/2018) 
EO 13660 (3/6/2014); 
Those responsible for undermining Ukraine’s democracy; threatening 
114 individuals, 24 entities 
Countering Russian 
peace, security, stability, sovereignty, or territorial integrity; 
 
Influence in Europe and 
misappropriating funds. 
Eurasia Act of 2017 (P.L. 
115-44, Countering 
America’s Adversaries 
Through Sanctions Act 
[CAATSA], Title II; 22 
U.S.C. 9501 et seq.) 
EO 13661 (3/17/2014); P.L. 
Anyone designated, including Russian government officials; those 
64 individuals, 56 entities 
115-44  
engaged in Russia’s arms sector; entities owned or controlled by a 
  
senior Russian government official; those materially assisting or 
supporting a senior Russian government official. 
EO 13662 (3/20/2014); P.L. 
Entities operating in sectors of the Russian economy, such as financial 
290 entities 
115-44  
services, energy, metals and mining, engineering, and defense and 
 
related matériel. Directives 1-4 specify financial services, energy 
(including certain kinds of oil projects), and defense. 
EO 13685 (12/19/2014); P.L. 
Activities in the Crimea region, including new investment, trade, and 
4 individuals, 58 entities, 2 
115-44  
related economic activities. 
vessels 
Support for the Sovereignty, 
Those responsible for violence; human rights abuses in Ukraine or in 
No designations to date; 
Integrity, Democracy, and 
any territory forcibly occupied or controlled by the Russian 
authorities and categories of 
Economic Stability of 
government; the undermining of Ukraine’s security and sovereignty.  
targets partially overlap with 
Ukraine Act of 2014 (P.L. 
Russian government officials (or associates) responsible for acts of 
executive orders and related 
113-95, as amended; 22 
significant corruption. 
designations. 
U.S.C. 8901 et seq.) 
Foreign persons who evade sanctions or facilitate significant 
transactions for persons subject to sanctions. 
Ukraine Freedom Support 
State-run arms exporter Rosoboronexport; Russian entities that 
No designations to date. 
Act of 2014 (P.L. 113-272, as  transfer weapons to Syria, Ukraine, Georgia, or Moldova (or other 
Rosoboronexport is designated 
amended; 22 U.S.C. 8921 et 
states, depending on President’s designations); and persons who 
under EO 13662. 
seq.) 
facilitate such transfers.   
Foreign persons (and financial institutions) that make significant 
investments in (or transactions for) certain kinds of oil projects. 
Foreign financial institutions that engage in significant transactions for 
persons subject to Ukraine-related sanctions.  
Source: Congressional Research Service (CRS).
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
 link to page 1  link to page 2 U.S. Sanctions on Russia Related to the Ukraine Conflict 
Executive and Congressional Actions 
Effectiveness and Impact of Sanctions 
A series of executive orders (EOs) issued in 2014 and 
More than three years since Ukraine-related sanctions were 
codified in the Countering America’s Adversaries Through 
first imposed, observers note that Russia has not reversed 
Sanctions Act (CAATSA; P.L. 115-44) form the basis for 
its occupation and annexation of Crimea, nor has it dropped 
designating Russian individuals and entities subject to 
its support for the Donbas separatists. Since sanctions were 
Ukraine-related sanctions. Also in 2014, Congress adopted 
introduced, however, Russia has signed two agreements 
two laws, amended by CAATSA, to strengthen and expand 
that recognize all of the Donbas as a part of Ukraine and 
sanctions (see Table 1). In issuing the EOs, President 
Russian-backed rebel military operations have been limited 
Obama identified individuals and entities subject to 
to areas along the perimeter of the current conflict zone. 
economic restrictions for having undermined the stability of 
In terms of the economic impact of sanctions, it is difficult 
Ukraine; misappropriated its state assets; annexed Crimea 
to disentangle their effect from the simultaneous drop in oil 
to Russia; used illicit armed force in Ukraine; and 
prices. Oil is a major export and source of revenue for the 
conducted business, trade, or investment in Crimea (see 
Russian government, and the twin shocks of sanctions and 
Table 2). Any individual or entity designated pursuant to 
collapse in oil prices in 2014 hit the Russian economy hard. 
these orders is subject to the blocking of assets under U.S. 
Between 2014 and 2016, Russia experienced capital flight, 
jurisdiction, prohibitions against U.S. persons engaging in 
currency depreciation, inflation, and budgetary pressures. 
transactions, and (for individuals) denial of entry into the 
Growth slowed to 0.7% in 2014 before contracting by 2.8% 
United States. Under EO 13662, Treasury also restricts 
in 2015 and by another 0.2% in 2016. The International 
transactions by persons under U.S. jurisdiction related to 
Monetary Fund (IMF) estimated in 2015 that sanctions and 
investment and financing for designated state-controlled 
Russia’s retaliatory ban on agricultural imports reduced 
companies in Russia’s financial sector, financing for 
output in Russia over the short term by up to 1.5%. 
designated companies in Russia’s energy and defense 
sectors, and transactions related to the development of 
Even though sanctions have been tightened, economic 
Russian deepwater, Arctic offshore, and shale oil projects.  
growth in Russia is strengthening, in part due to higher oil 
prices. Russia’s economy grew by 1.8% in 2017 and is 
Table 2. Targeted Individuals/Entities (as of 2/2018) 
projected to grow by 1.7% in 2018. However, the economic 
effects of restrictions on U.S. long-term financing for 
EO 13660: Former Ukrainian officials; individuals in Crimea and 
certain sectors and technology for specific oil exploration 
the Donbas secessionist entities; Russian supporters; associated 
projects may manifest more prominently over the longer 
companies or organizations. 
term. 
EO 13661: Russian officials, deputies, businesspeople, and 
The Future of Ukraine-Related Sanctions 
associates who support Russia’s actions in Ukraine, are 
considered part of Putin’s “inner circle,” and/or support senior 
Before the passage of CAATSA, the Trump Administration 
officials or sanctioned entities; Bank Rossiya, described by 
stated on several occasions that Ukraine-related sanctions 
Treasury as the “personal bank” of Russian senior officials; 
would remain in place “until Moscow reverses the actions 
Almaz-Antey, a state-owned defense company; other defense 
that triggered” them. It also has made additional 
firms (mostly subsidiaries of Almaz-Antey or the state-controlled 
designations under the existing executive orders. CAATSA 
defense and hi-tech conglomerate Rostec); and associated 
has established a mechanism for Congress to review any 
companies or organizations. 
action the President takes to ease or lift a variety of 
sanctions. Certain sanctions may be waived only if the 
EO 13662: Sectoral sanctions on several major companies and 
President certifies that the Russian government “is taking 
subsidiaries: lending and investment restrictions on four large 
steps to implement the Minsk Agreement to address the 
state-controlled banks and VEB, which “acts as a development 
ongoing conflict in eastern Ukraine.”  
bank and payment agent for the Russian government”; lending 
Although the President signed CAATSA, the Trump 
restrictions on state-controlled defense and hi-tech 
Administration has yet to exercise its authorities to impose 
conglomerate Rostec, oil companies Rosneft and Gazpromneft, 
additional sanctions related to Ukraine or other issues. 
pipeline company Transneft, and private gas producer Novatek; 
Many in Congress are watching this closely.  
restrictions on transactions related to deepwater, Arctic 
offshore, or shale oil projects. 
The United States also imposes sanctions on Russian 
individuals and entities for activities unrelated to events in 
EO 13685: Mostly Russian or Crimea-based companies and 
Ukraine.  
subsidiaries operating in Crimea. 
For more, see CRS In Focus IF10779, Overview of U.S. 
Source: CRS. 
Sanctions Regimes on Russia Also see CRS In Focus 
CAATSA directed the Secretary of the Treasury to further 
IF10614, EU Sanctions on Russia Related to the Ukraine 
restrict financing for Russia’s financial and energy sectors 
Conflict; CRS Report R43895, U.S. Sanctions and Russia’s 
and to extend prohibitions related to the above oil projects 
Economy; and CRS Report R44775, Russia: Background 
to projects worldwide that involve any designated persons 
and U.S. Policy. 
who have an ownership interest of not less than 33%.      
 
 
The Departments of State and Commerce also deny export 
 
licenses for military, dual-use, and energy-related goods for 
 
designated end users (most of which also are subject to 
 
Treasury-administered sanctions).    
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
U.S. Sanctions on Russia Related to the Ukraine Conflict 
 
Cory Welt, Analyst in European Affairs   
 
Rebecca M. Nelson, Specialist in International Trade and 
 
Finance   
 
Dianne E. Rennack, Specialist in Foreign Policy 
 
 
Legislation   
 
IF10552
 
 
Disclaimer 
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to 
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. 
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has 
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the 
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be 
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include 
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you 
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 
 
https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF10552 · VERSION 14 · UPDATED