link to page 1  link to page 2  link to page 1  link to page 2  link to page 2  link to page 2 


 
December 29, 2017
Agricultural Trade Balances Under NAFTA
A focus on trade deficits has emerged as an important 
meat, and dairy products. Imports from Mexico were valued 
fixture of the Trump Administration’s trade policy, 
at $23.0 billion, resulting in a trade deficit of $5.1 billion in 
including its ongoing review of the North American Free 
2016. The balance of agricultural trade between the United 
Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Merchandise trade deficits (or 
States and Mexico has also alternated between a trade 
surpluses) refer to an accounting of the net balance of 
surplus and a trade deficit since NAFTA was implemented. 
exports and imports of goods. In agricultural trade, the U.S. 
From 2012 to 2016, the U.S. trade deficit with Mexico 
Department of Agriculture (USDA) reports that the United 
averaged $1.1 billion per year (Figure 2). The deficit grew 
States had a trade surplus of $20.3 billion in 2016 based on 
sharply beginning in 2015 as certain U.S. agricultural 
total U.S. agricultural exports of $134.9 billion worldwide 
imports from Mexico continued to grow while overall U.S. 
compared to imports of $114.6 billion. This aggregate 
exports to Mexico receded (Table 1). Prior to 2015, U.S.-
surplus, however, masks trade deficits for some product 
Mexico agricultural trade consistently showed a surplus.  
categories or within some markets. 
Figure 1. U.S.-Canada Agricultural Trade, 1990-2016 
The value of U.S. agricultural trade with its NAFTA 
partners—Canada and Mexico—has increased sharply since 
NAFTA was implemented. Total U.S. agricultural exports 
under NAFTA rose from $8.7 billion in 1992 to $38.1 
billion in 2016. U.S. imports also rose from $6.5 billion to 
$44.5 billion. This resulted in a $6.4 billion trade deficit for 
U.S. agricultural products in 2016. In general, the U.S. 
agriculture trade balance with NAFTA countries has 
fluctuated, resulting in a surplus in some years and a deficit 
in others. Further examination reveals that this deficit is 
concentrated with certain agricultural products and also 
varies depending on the trading partner country. It also 
reveals that the U.S. trade deficit for certain products might 
be attributable to longer-term market changes.  
 
In 2016, U.S. agricultural exports to Canada totaled $20.2 
Figure 2. U.S.-Mexico Agricultural Trade, 1990-2016 
billion. Leading exports were grains and feed, meat and 
poultry products, fresh and processed fruits and vegetables, 
sugar and related products, oilseeds, and nuts. Agricultural 
imports from Canada were valued at $21.6 billion, resulting 
in a U.S. trade deficit of $1.3 billion in 2016. However, 
since NAFTA was implemented, the balance of agricultural 
trade between the United States and Canada has alternated 
between a trade surplus and a trade deficit (Figure 1). 
Averaged over the 2012-2016 period, the U.S. agricultural 
trade deficit with Canada averaged $0.7 billion per year.  
Table 1 highlights that most product categories are marked 
by annual U.S. trade surpluses, including sugar and related 
products, fruits and vegetables, nuts, and dairy products. 
U.S. agricultural trade deficits with Canada are attributed to 
 
trade in meat, grains, and oilseeds. In 2016, the U.S.-
Source: CRS using USDA data for “Agricultural Products” as defined 
Canada agricultural trade deficit totaled $3.6 billion for 
by USDA. Data are not adjusted for inflation. 
grains and oilseeds and $1.6 billion for meat (mostly pork). 
This trade disparity is largely explained by general market 
Table 1 highlights which product categories have seen the 
and trade trends between the United States and Canada but 
greatest gap in the value of U.S. exports compared to 
also by trade patterns in these products with other global 
imports from Mexico in recent years. Much of the current 
trading partners. This deficit with Canada does not reflect 
U.S. agricultural trade deficit is attributable to sharp 
global U.S. grain and meat trade trends, which generally 
increases in U.S. imports of Mexico’s fruits and vegetables. 
reflect a trade surplus each year. 
In 2016, the U.S.-Mexico trade deficit totaled $6 billion for 
fresh and processed vegetables and $5.2 billion for fresh 
U.S. agricultural exports to Mexico were valued at $17.8 
and processed fruits (Table 1). Mexico’s increased fruit and 
billion in 2016. Leading exports were grains, oilseeds, 
vegetables production and export supplies may largely be 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
 link to page 1  link to page 1  link to page 1  link to page 2  link to page 2 

Agricultural Trade Balances Under NAFTA 
explained by its ability to grow certain crops during the 
already accounts for 60%-70% of Canada’s imports of 
U.S. winter season, increased U.S. business investment and 
grains, oilseeds, and meat products and accounts for about 
market integration in Mexico’s produce sectors, and 
70% of Mexico’s fruit and vegetable imports (Figure 4).  
increased demand for year-round fruits and vegetables by 
consumers in the United States. This deficit reflects broader 
A trade imbalance does not imply any particular economic 
global trends in U.S. fruit and vegetable trade. (See CRS 
cost or benefit for either country. For example, there has 
Report RL34468, The U.S. Trade Situation for Fruit and 
been substantial cross-border foreign investment and 
Vegetable Products.) Growth in Mexico’s produce exports 
market integration between the United States and its 
is also attributed to its investment in large-scale greenhouse 
NAFTA partners (e.g., U.S.-Canada animal finishing 
production facilities, which some claim has been supported 
operations and U.S.-Mexico produce operations). USDA 
by the Mexican government.  
reports that since NAFTA was implemented, U.S. direct 
investment in Mexico’s and Canada’s production 
Table 1. U.S.-NAFTA Trade Balance, 2012-2016 
agriculture has increased. Accordingly, product imports 
Product Group 
2012 
2013 
2014 
2015 
2016 
from a country could in part reflect sales from a partnership 
or U.S.-owned business in the partner country, highlighting 
($billions) 
diverse potential import benefits for U.S. stakeholders. 
U.S.-Canada Agricultural Trade 
Grains, feeds 
(1.3) 
(1.8) 
(1.7) 
(1.4) 
(1.5) 
Figure 3. Canada’s Agricultural Suppliers, 2016 
Meat, poultry 
(0.7) 
(1.0) 
(2.1) 
(1.7) 
(1.6) 
Dairy products 
0.1 
0.2 
0.2 
0.2 
0.2 
Vegetables, prods. 
0.4 
0.4 
0.5 
0.6 
0.4 
Fruits, preps. 
1.6 
1.7 
1.7 
1.5 
1.5 
Sugars, products 
1.3 
1.2 
1.3 
1.2 
1.3 
Oilseeds, prods. 
(2.0) 
(2.2) 
(2.3) 
(2.0) 
(2.1) 
Nuts, preps. 
0.6 
0.7 
0.8 
0.8 
0.7 
Beverages, juice 
0.8 
0.9 
0.9 
0.9 
0.8 
Total  
0.4 
(0.4) 
(1.2) 
(0.8) 
(1.3) 
U.S.-Mexico Agricultural Trade 
Meat, poultry 
2.6  
3.1  
3.3  
2.2  
2.3  
Dairy products 
1.1 
1.3 
1.5 
1.1 
1.1 
 
Grains, feeds 
4.7  
3.7  
3.8  
3.5  
3.6   Figure 4. Mexico’s Agricultural Suppliers, 2016 
Oilseeds, prods. 
3.2  
2.8  
3.2  
2.8  
2.8  
Sugars, products 
(<0.1) 
 (0.5) 
 (0.3) 
 (0.4) 
 (0.4) 
Other horticulture 
0.5  
0.5  
0.5  
0.5  
0.5  
Vegetables, prods. 
 (4.2) 
 (4.8) 
 (4.9) 
 (5.1) 
 (6.0) 
Fruits, preps. 
 (2.7) 
 (3.0) 
 (3.7) 
 (4.4) 
 (5.2) 
Beverages, juice 
 (2.1) 
 (2.2) 
 (2.7) 
 (2.9) 
 (3.4) 
Total  
2.5  
0.4  
0.1    (3.3) 
 (5.1) 
Source: CRS using USDA data. Totals do not add as some product 
groups are excluded. Values in parentheses represent a trade deficit. 
A focus on periodic trade imbalances for certain products 
masks the fact that, overall, NAFTA has contributed to 
 
three- to four-fold growth in the value of U.S. agricultural 
Source: Compiled by CRS using Global Trade Atlas. 
exports within NAFTA since it was implemented (Figure 
1, Figure 2). It also masks that trade balances often tend to 
Issues raised here focus primarily on the microeconomic 
be highly variable year-to-year—resulting in an overall 
factors that affect trade balances for particular products. In 
surplus in some years or in deficits for some products that 
general, however, most economists conclude that the trade 
may be balanced out by surpluses for other products.  
balances may be influenced by a number of macroeconomic 
factors. Factors may include differences between countries 
Often agricultural trade deficits exist because consumer 
in savings and investment within the economy, economic 
demand in one country is much greater than in the trading 
growth, and infrastructure and distribution networks, as 
partner country (e.g., U.S. year-round fruit and vegetable 
well as periodic fluctuations in exchange rates and changes 
demand that cannot be met by seasonal U.S. production). 
in consumer demand. For additional information, see CRS 
Duty-free access under NAFTA of product imports 
In Focus IF10619, The U.S. Trade Deficit: An Overview. 
generally results in lower consumer prices compared to 
imports without preferential access. Also, opportunities to 
Renée Johnson, Specialist in Agricultural Policy   
increase exports may be limited if the target market is 
already saturated. As shown in Figure 3, the United States 
IF10800
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
Agricultural Trade Balances Under NAFTA 
 
 
Disclaimer 
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to 
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. 
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has 
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the 
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be 
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include 
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you 
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 
 
https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF10800 · VERSION 2 · NEW