link to page 1  link to page 1  link to page 1 


 
Updated September 12, 2017
U.S. Agency for International Development: An Overview
Background 
Figure 1. USAID-Implemented Program Funding by 
 
Region: FY2016 
The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) 
is the leading international humanitarian and development 
arm of the United States government. Its programs also 
support the political and strategic aims of the United States 
by providing assistance to strategically important and 
conflict countries, and assist U.S. commercial interests by 
furthering the economic growth of developing countries and 
building these countries’ capacity to participate in world 
trade. 
In FY2017, USAID is responsible for over $20 billion in 
appropriations, representing more than one-third of the 
International Affairs 150 budget function and more than 
half of total foreign assistance encompassed by the State, 
Foreign Operations Appropriations (SFOPS) and 
international food aid appropriated under the Agriculture 
Appropriations. USAID’s annual appropriations come from 
 
14 different budget accounts—most “solely-owned” and 
Source: USAID, https://explorer.usaid.gov and CRS calculations. 
some shared with the Department of State—making any 
calculation of its current budget somewhat imprecise. 
Of FY2016 funds attributable to a specific sector (Figure 
2), 41% went for health programs and 20% for 
humanitarian efforts. Since the early 1990s, health 
We partner to end extreme poverty and to promote 
programs have consistently been the largest USAID 
resilient, democratic societies while advancing our security 
assistance sector, bolstered since 2004 by billions of dollars 
and prosperity.  USAID Mission Statement 
in transfers from the Department of State’s President’s 
 
Emergency Program for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR).  
USAID maintains more than 60 country and regional 
Humanitarian aid, too, has increased significantly in recent 
missions that design and manage a wide range of projects, 
years, particularly in response to the 2004 Indian Ocean 
most intended to meet specific development objectives as 
earthquake and tsunami, the 2010 Haiti earthquake, and the 
formulated in a Country Development Cooperation 
2014 Ebola epidemic. 
Strategy. Most projects are implemented through some 
form of grant, cooperative agreement, or contract by one of 
Figure 2. USAID-Implemented Program Funding by 
thousands of potential development partners—such as U.S. 
Sector: FY2016 
nonprofit private voluntary organizations and other non-
governmental organizations (NGOs), U.S. for-profit 
contractors, universities, international organizations, and 
foreign partner governments, civil society, and the private 
sector. 
In FY2016, the most recent year in which detailed data is 
available, USAID provided assistance to over 120 
countries, including 74 of the 84 low and lower-middle 
income countries. Foreign aid allocations reflect both 
recipient needs and U.S. foreign policy priorities. 
Suggestive of the strong foreign policy purpose behind 
many USAID activities, the top 10 recipients of USAID-
implemented funds in FY2016 were Afghanistan, Ethiopia, 
Syria (for refugees), South Sudan, Kenya, Jordan, Nigeria, 
Pakistan, Iraq, and Democratic Republic of Congo. In 
FY2016, about 52% of USAID funds attributable to 
 
countries and regions went to sub-Saharan Africa and 17% 
Source: USAID, https://explorer.usaid.gov and CRS calculations. 
went to the Middle East and North Africa (Figure 1).   
USAID Under the Trump Administration 
Administrator Mark Green was sworn in August 7, 2017. 
While no new policies have been announced under his 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
U.S. Agency for International Development: An Overview 
leadership, in testimony he cited accountability, focusing on 
missions are insufficiently staffed, especially in crisis 
what works, incentivizing local capacity-building and 
countries. Despite an increased number of USAID Foreign 
implementation, and leveraging partnerships with the 
Service Officers in recent years, the agency still faces 
private sector among his guiding principles. Prior to 
shortages of specific skill sets—for example, contract 
Administrator Green’s confirmation, the Trump 
officers and program officers to meet the needs generated 
Administration proposed an FY2018 budget that would cut 
by the on-going effort to work more closely with local 
USAID funding by nearly 40%. Congress is likely to 
government and private sector partners, and agricultural 
modify the Administration’s proposal, but account and 
specialists to develop and implement Food Security 
programs cuts could have a major impact on how USAID is 
Initiative projects. Staff retention, especially of foreign 
able to address operational challenges. 
nationals, and lack of language and skill training are 
continuing human resource concerns.   
Challenges  
Program Flexibility. Congressional funding mandates, 
USAID faces numerous challenges in the process of 
specifying amounts for health, biodiversity, and other 
fulfilling its mission, in part due to the setting in which it 
sectors, account for as much as two-thirds of USAID’s 
often operates—developing countries. Among the 
annual program budget. These, plus a host of presidential 
continuing and new challenges that observers have noted 
initiatives, are viewed by many observers as restricting the 
and the Congress may track closely are the following:  
ability of USAID mission personnel to program project 
activities in accordance with development professional and 
Reform. A March 2017 executive order seeking a 
partner country priorities. Some critics believe that many 
comprehensive plan to reform government and reduce the 
legislative conditions further stymie flexibility—most food 
workforce requires agencies to propose efficiencies and 
aid, for example, must be provided in the form of U.S. 
program cuts. It remains to be seen whether any proposed 
produce and shipped on expensive U.S. freighters instead of 
changes will complement the so-called USAID Forward 
purchased with cash near a food emergency site. 
reforms undertaken during the Obama Administration, 
which sought to improve the way USAID did business, or 
Scaling-Up.  Innovations in science, technology, and 
take a markedly different approach. The congressional role 
development practice are usually tested with pilot programs 
in approving executive-initiated reforms is unclear at this 
in one province in one country. Seeing successful ideas 
point as well. 
from pilot through to maturity and making them work at the 
country, region, and international level likely requires a 
USAID Status. The Administration reorganization effort 
long-term funding horizon, programming flexibility, and 
has stimulated multiple reform proposals from NGOs, 
mechanisms to spread ideas throughout the agency. Each of 
including calls for making USAID the coordinator of all 
these elements represents a challenge in the current aid 
government humanitarian and development assistance, for 
policy and planning process. 
the absorption of USAID into the Department of State, and 
for creation of an entirely new aid agency, among others. 
Evaluation. To improve its learning process, USAID has 
Deputy Secretary of State Sullivan has said absorption into 
State is not planned. Any change in USAID’s institutional 
required more project evaluations and has established 
improved indicators by which it can measure project 
status must have congressional approval.  
progress. The next step and challenge for the agency is to 
ensure that lessons learned are applied to future projects so 
Local Solutions.  Under USAID Forward, the agency 
that actual change results in how things are done. 
sought, with variable success, to push an increasing amount 
of assistance through local entities—15.9% of mission 
Security. Security concerns in non-permissive 
program funds in FY2016, down from a high of 18.6% in 
environments, such as South Sudan and Afghanistan, raise 
FY2015. Ensuring accountability for use of U.S. taxpayer 
obstacles to successful project implementation, including 
dollars by local governments, civil society, and private 
restricted access to local projects for monitoring purposes 
business in at times corrupt societies requires special efforts 
and finding contractors willing to take the risk of 
to mitigate risk, including a need for more personnel and 
establishing a local presence. Even in “normal” countries, 
funding in order to monitor local entities and build their 
security concerns have often caused the co-location of 
capacities. 
USAID in isolated and extremely secure U.S. embassies 
that discourage the interaction with local government and 
Sustainability. How can USAID ensure that project efforts 
private sector considered necessary by many observers for 
are maintained by local governments and organizations 
successful development programs. 
after U.S. financial and technical support ends? One 
USAID response is the Local Solutions initiative that seeks 
to build “country ownership” for development objectives.  
For further background on the agency, see CRS Report 
R44117, U.S. Agency for International Development 
Another is more domestic resource mobilization efforts—
(USAID): Background, Operations, and Issues. 
projects to develop a government’s capacity to collect 
revenue to support development. Sustainability is 
increasingly viewed as a measure of aid effectiveness. 
Curt Tarnoff, Specialist in Foreign Affairs   
IF10261
Human Resources. A 2015 study of the stress faced by 
USAID staff suggests that employees are overburdened and 
 
 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
U.S. Agency for International Development: An Overview 
 
 
Disclaimer 
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to 
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. 
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has 
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the 
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be 
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include 
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you 
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 
 
https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF10261 · VERSION 6 · UPDATED