link to page 1 

 
Updated January 9, 2017
Expanding Federal Support for Urban Agriculture
Over the past decade, food policy in the United States has 
farming now covers a range of operations including vacant 
addressed ongoing shifts in consumer preferences and 
city lots, city parks, churchyards, schoolyards, backyards, 
producer trends that favor local and regional food systems. 
and community gardens. Operations may be on private or 
This has led to increased agricultural production in urban 
public land owned individually or by a community group, 
areas within and surrounding major U.S. cities.  
institution, municipality, or land trust. Operations may be 
managed by a nonprofit organization or private enterprise to 
Congress has influenced this shift through various enacted 
grow food for sale at retail stores, or they may be smaller-
changes in U.S. farm policy. The previous two farm bills—
sized operations that grow exclusively for sale at farmers’ 
the Agricultural Act of 2014 (P.L. 113-79) and the Food, 
markets or for field-to-direct-sales to consumers, food 
Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (P.L. 110-246)—
processors, and cottage food makers (home kitchens). 
expanded federal support for local and regional food 
Among the types of foods grown are row crops (including 
systems. These legislative changes, mostly in the form of 
medicinal and ornamental plants), fruit trees, and some 
new or expanded grants and loans, support urban 
types of livestock (e.g., chickens, goats, and honey bees). 
agriculture although not explicitly so. Many of these 
changes resulted from introduced legislation representing 
Urban farming operations, however, can be very diverse in 
comprehensive “marker bills” addressing provisions across 
terms of the types of systems and practices used. For 
multiple farm bill titles, recommending changes to provide 
example, increasingly urban agriculture involves large-scale 
additional support for local and regional food systems.  
innovative systems and capital-intensive operations, vertical 
and roof-top farms, hydroponic greenhouses (such as using 
In addition to implementing these legislative changes, the 
soil-less systems), and aquaponic facilities. 
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) implemented a 
number of agency-wide initiatives to further institutionalize 
USDA does not collect comprehensive nationwide data on 
these programmatic changes. Its leading initiative—“Know 
urban agricultural sites in the United States, and only 
Your Farmer, Know Your Food”—was launched in 2009 to 
limited information is available for select localities from 
eliminate organizational barriers between existing programs 
individual case studies of urban agricultural and community 
and promote enhanced collaboration within USDA. In 
operations in larger cities and broader production regions. 
2016, USDA also launched its “Urban Agriculture Toolkit” 
Cities with a larger number of urban agricultural operations 
to support production and increase access to healthy foods 
include Chicago (IL), New York (NY), Philadelphia (PA), 
through urban agriculture. During this period, USDA has 
Detroit (MI), Oakland (CA), Portland (OR), Cleveland 
invested $1 billion in 40,000 projects to develop local and 
(OH), Los Angeles (CA), Providence (RI), Seattle (WA), 
regional agricultural market opportunities.  
San Francisco (CA), Austin (TX), and Minneapolis, MN, 
among other areas throughout the country (Figure 1). Some 
In anticipation of the 2018 farm bill reauthorization, the 
existing or planned large-scale facilities include Grange 
Urban Agriculture Act of 2016 (S. 3420, Stabenow) was 
Farm and Gotham Greens (New York, NY); Hantz Farms 
introduced in the 114th Congress. A similar bill was 
(Detroit, MI); Growing Power (Milwaukee, WI, and 
introduced in the 113th Congress (H.R. 5616, Kaptur). 
Chicago, IL); FarmedHere (Chicago, IL); AeroFarms (New 
These bills proposed to expand existing farm programs and 
Jersey); and Bright Farms facilities (Illinois, Missouri, 
funding, as well as fund new programs and incentives, to 
Pennsylvania, and Virginia). 
promote urban agriculture (see text box). For example, in 
the 114th Congress, S. 3420 would have provided additional 
Figure 1. Reported Urban Agriculture Sites 
mandatory funding and authorize appropriations to support 
competitive grants and research initiatives supporting urban 
farming along with expanded risk management tools. It 
would have also provided new support for business 
planning, composting, community access to healthy foods 
and expanded USDA data collection. The expected total 
cost of the bill is not available, as the Congressional Budget 
Office did not provide a cost estimate.  
Urban Agriculture in the United States 
In the United States, urban agriculture has evolved over 
time, starting with vacant lot cultivation and encompassing 
school gardens, the city beautification movement prior to 
 
World War I, Victory gardens during World Wars I and II, 
Source: Urban Farming, http://www.urbanfarming.org/garden-
and relief gardens during the Great Depression. Urban 
locations.html. Data are self-reported and not comprehensive. 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
Expanding Federal Support for Urban Agriculture 
Urban Agriculture Act of 2016 (S. 3420) 
S. 3240 did not define “urban agriculture” but defined an 
“urban farmer” as a beginning farmer or rancher farming in 
 
Create a new USDA “Office of Urban Agriculture” to 
an urban area, which would be determined by USDA. H.R. 
conduct outreach and/or coordinate policies and activities 
5616 defined an “urban farmer or rancher” as a person 
 
Establish an “Urban Agriculture Advisory Committee” to 
owning or operating a farm or ranch in an urban area, 
advise USDA on urban agricultural production policies 
meaning an “area within a Metropolitan Statistical Area” 
(MSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget 
 
Create USDA grant programs and expand existing grant and 
loan programs to benefit urban agriculture  
(OMB). OMB’s definition covers areas with at least one 
urbanized area of 50,000 people or more plus adjacent 
 
Expand selected existing USDA programs covering risk 
territory that is economically connected to the central urban 
management, rural development, conservation, and 
area. MSAs generally cover a larger geographical area and 
agricultural research and cooperative extension programs  
likely include some traditionally agricultural areas. 
 
Create new pilot programs targeting soil testing/remediation 
Separating out available MSA data to isolate farms in urban 
and composting and supporting sustainable practices and 
and/or peri-urban areas (referring to areas immediately 
access to healthy foods 
surrounding a city or town, generally between the suburbs 
 
Articulate “a broadly inclusive description of urban 
and rural areas) is difficult given existing data limitations. 
agriculture” covering practices such as “edible gardens, 
green walls, rooftop agriculture, and indoor vertical farms”  
Limited estimates are available from USDA on the number 
of U.S. farms within MSAs based on the 2007 Census of 
 
Enhance USDA’s data collection regarding urban agriculture 
Agriculture. More recent statistics are not available. USDA 
Source: CRS from provisions in S. 3420 (114th Congress). 
estimates that there were about 859,300 metropolitan farms 
in the United States, accounting for about 40% of all U.S. 
Urban farming operations often differ in terms of their 
farms and about 40% of the total value of U.S. agricultural 
underlying motivations and objectives. Oftentimes, urban 
production. USDA reports that metro farms tend to have a 
agriculture is not strictly production-oriented. Among the 
different product mix than farms in non-metro areas, with 
goals are community and economic development, health 
mostly high-value crops, such as fruits and vegetables, and 
education, access to nutritious foods, sustainable urban 
also livestock and dairy products. A subsequent, more 
development, environmental protection, and a range of 
targeted analysis of the 2007 Census data, compiled by the 
social justice and equity concerns. Studies show, for 
leading 50 MSAs, suggest that about 6% of U.S. farmland 
example, that groups engaged in urban agriculture are 
(55 million acres) and 14% of U.S. farms (316,000 farms) 
mostly motivated by an interest in community building, 
were located in urban and peri-urban areas across 40 states 
education, food quality, and sustainability. Urban farming 
nationwide. This illustrates that how urban agriculture is 
has also been promoted as a means of supporting food 
defined could influence what share of the U.S. farming 
access to address food insecurity in some urban areas (e.g., 
population is covered by any farm policy changes.  
food deserts). However, some question whether urban 
farming can be profitable given the costs of land ownership, 
Other general observations are as follows. First, some of the 
zoning restrictions, energy costs, and other farming inputs. 
proposed policies could expand certain existing USDA 
Other challenges facing urban operations include access to 
programs to specifically include urban agriculture, although 
credit and water and lack of infrastructure for marketing 
such production is not generally excluded from most USDA 
and processing foods grown in urban areas. While 
programs and may already be covered (e.g., USDA rural 
recognizing that urban farms may provide services other 
development, conservation, and research programs). 
than food (e.g., education, community building, outdoor 
Second, some proposed policies could expand the scope of 
recreation), some question whether urban farms can 
certain existing USDA programs to include urban 
substantially contribute to U.S. food consumption.  
agriculture without providing additional program funding 
and could dilute coverage for others already covered by the 
Defining Urban Farming and Other Considerations  
program (e.g., USDA grant and loan programs). Third, 
Among the issues that may need to be resolved as Congress 
despite an intended focus of urban agriculture, some 
considers changes to U.S. farm policy to better support 
proposed policies are open-ended and could apply to non-
urban farming is what constitutes “urban agriculture.” 
urban agricultural production (e.g., farm credit and risk 
Currently, there is no statutory or single formal definition of 
management programs). Finally, some proposed policies 
urban agriculture. The websites of both USDA and the U.S. 
tackle issues that have historically fallen outside the scope 
Environmental Protection Agency state: “City and suburban 
of U.S. farm policy and the farm bill (e.g., environmental 
agriculture takes the form of backyard, roof-top and 
quality and remediation, stormwater management, and land 
balcony gardening, community gardening in vacant lots and 
tenure issues). 
parks, roadside urban fringe agriculture and livestock 
For more information see CRS Report R43950, Local Food 
grazing in open space.” What constitutes urban farming 
Systems: Selected Farm Bill and Other Federal Programs; 
likely varies depending on the location and level of 
and CRS Report R44390, The Role of Local and Regional 
development within the population. What constitutes a 
Food Systems in U.S. Farm Policy. 
“farm” is generally defined as an entity that produces at 
least $1,000 annually of agricultural products. This 
Renée Johnson, Specialist in Agricultural Policy   
definition might exclude some operations that might self-
identify as urban farms, such as some community gardens, 
IF10498
very small commercial farms, and nonprofit farms. 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
Expanding Federal Support for Urban Agriculture 
 
 
Disclaimer 
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to 
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. 
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has 
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the 
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be 
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include 
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you 
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 
 
https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF10498 · VERSION 5 · UPDATED