link to page 2 link to page 2
Updated February 12, 2016
The Clean Power Plan (CPP): The Treatment of Biomass
The Clean Power Plan
and, in some cases, the alternative fate of the feedstock.” It
On August 3, 2015, the Obama Administration issued its
is not known when a final Framework may be released.
final rule for carbon dioxide (CO2) emission reductions
Another effort is the proposed federal plan for the CPP—
from existing fossil fuel-fired electric power plants,
the federal plan to be implemented if a state does not
commonly referred to as the Clean Power Plan (CPP). The
submit an approvable plan by the assigned deadline. It was
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) administers
released concurrently with the CPP final rule. The proposed
the CPP under an authority granted to the agency in Section
federal plan requests comments on the inclusion of biomass
111(d) of the Clean Air Act (CAA; 42 U.S.C. 7411). In
and its treatment within the federal plan (e.g., a list of
general, the CPP requires states to devise a plan that—by
preapproved qualified biomass fuels). Comments received
reducing CO2 emissions from the affected facilities in
may impact which biomass types the EPA deems eligible
accordance with guidance established by EPA—allows
for the CPP or why the use of biomass should be restricted.
them to reach a state-specific emission reduction goal by
2030. States are required to submit their plans by
The CPP final rule requires additional accounting and
September 6, 2016, although they may request a two-year
reporting requirements should a state decide to use qualified
extension. A federal plan will be used to implement the
biomass. For instance, states will have to submit the
CPP for states that do not submit a plan. Further, states are
biomass type they propose to use and explain why this
required to implement their plans in 2022. EPA says the
biomass should be considered qualified biomass, along with
CPP offers states “broad flexibility and latitude in
biomass monitoring, reporting, and verification measures.
complying with their obligations” by providing multiple
For some biomass types, the plan must include measures
strategies that states may undertake to meet their goal,
the state will take to verify the biomass type, its origin, and
including increased use of non-fossil fuel energy sources,
any associated sustainability practices. EPA asserts that the
such as renewable energy. On February 9, 2016, the
approval of biomass for a state plan is contingent upon
Supreme Court granted a stay of EPA’s CPP, pending the
whether the “measures for qualified biomass and related
Court’s consideration of whether to hear the case.
biogenic CO2 benefits are quantifiable, verifiable,
enforceable, non-duplicative and permanent.”
How Is Biomass Accounted for in the CPP?
EPA specifies that “qualified biomass” may be included in
Clean Energy Incentive Program
a state’s plan. EPA defines qualified biomass as a biomass
In the final rule, EPA announced a Clean Energy Incentive
feedstock that has been demonstrated to be a method to
Program (CEIP)—an optional program in which states may
control increases of CO2 levels in the atmosphere. EPA
participate. EPA says it is establishing the CEIP to
defines biomass as biologically based material that is living
encourage early investments in renewable energy (RE) and
or dead above and/or below ground and is available on a
demand-side energy efficiency (EE) by the states. Biomass
renewable or recurring basis. EPA states that it will “review
is excluded from the CEIP. While details about the program
the appropriateness and basis for determining qualified
are forthcoming, EPA specifies that the only RE options
biomass feedstocks or feedstock categories in its review of
available to states are power from wind and solar resources
the approvability of a state plan.” While EPA explicitly
(see Figure 1 and Figure 2). Demand-side EE—generally
states that “not all forms of biomass are expected to be
described as a technique to affect consumer behavior that
approvable as qualified biomass,” it gives some indication
results in a reduction in electricity use—does not apply to
as to what exactly may qualify (e.g., waste-derived
energy supply activities such as producing power.
feedstock, certain forest and agriculture-derived industrial
byproducts).
The Role of Biopower in the CPP
It is not clear how pronounced a role biopower—the
One reason EPA may be unable to give additional
generation of electric power from biomass feedstocks—will
information about the specific biomass types that may
qualify could be the agency’
play in state plans to meet state-specific emission reduction
s ongoing efforts to determine
goals. First, EPA has placed the onus on states to
the carbon status of biomass (e.g., carbon neutrality). One
demonstrate the eligibility of biomass for the CPP, with
such effort referred to in the final rule is the EPA Science
EPA making the final decision. Thus far, EPA has provided
Advisory Board (SAB) draft 2014 report Framework for
little direct guidance on biomass in the final rule. This
Assessing Biogenic Carbon Dioxide for Stationary Sources
could be due to multiple reasons, including a wait-and-see
(Framework). The Framework maintains that it is “not
approach to find out what states propose, to review
scientifically valid to assume that all biogenic feedstocks
comments received about biomass for the proposed federal
are carbon neutral, but that the net biogenic CO2
plan, or to obtain additional information from the SAB. The
atmospheric contribution of different biomass feedstocks
many requirements states must adhere to in order to include
can vary and depends on various factors, including
biomass in their plans, without clear direction on what will
feedstock type and characteristics, production practices,
and will not be approved, may deter some states from
https://crsreports.congress.gov