{ "id": "RS22773", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "number": "RS22773", "active": false, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 370413, "date": "2009-01-15", "retrieved": "2016-04-07T02:54:03.743081", "title": "\u201cSanctuary Cities\u201d: Legal Issues", "summary": "Controversy has arisen over the existence of so-called \u201csanctuary cities.\u201d The term \u201csanctuary city\u201d is not defined by federal law, but it is often used to refer to those localities which, as a result of a state or local act, ordinance, policy, or fiscal constraints, place limits on their assistance to federal immigration authorities seeking to apprehend and remove unauthorized aliens. Supporters of such policies argue that many cities have higher priorities, and that local efforts to deter the presence of unauthorized aliens would undermine community relations, disrupt municipal services, interfere with local law enforcement, or violate humanitarian principles. Opponents argue that sanctuary policies encourage illegal immigration and undermine federal enforcement efforts. Pursuant to \u00a7 434 of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA, P.L. 104-193) and \u00a7 642 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA, P.L. 104-208), states and localities may not limit their governmental entities or officers from maintaining records regarding a person\u2019s immigration status, or bar the exchange of such information with any federal, state, or local entity. Reportedly, some jurisdictions with sanctuary policies take a \u201cdon\u2019t ask, don\u2019t tell\u201d approach, where officials are barred from inquiring about a person\u2019s immigration status in certain circumstances. Though this method does not directly conflict with federal requirements that states and localities permit the free exchange of information regarding persons\u2019 immigration status, it results in specified agencies or officers lacking information that they could potentially share with federal immigration authorities. In the 110th Congress, several bills were introduced that attempted to limit formal or informal sanctuary policies and induce greater sharing of immigration information by state and local authorities. Bills have also been introduced in the 111th Congress to restrict or expand states and localities\u2019 information-sharing requirements.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RS22773", "sha1": "52edd43d0767026186df05054b51facc359436c9", "filename": "files/20090115_RS22773_52edd43d0767026186df05054b51facc359436c9.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RS22773", "sha1": "1d3f9c5123bb3163a3698c59710640b84dd33a80", "filename": "files/20090115_RS22773_1d3f9c5123bb3163a3698c59710640b84dd33a80.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc806182/", "id": "RS22773_2008Jan09", "date": "2008-01-09", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "\u201cSanctuary Cities\u201d: Legal Issues", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20080109_RS22773_775222fac802cb471150e83a62f027a28ac2f2fd.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20080109_RS22773_775222fac802cb471150e83a62f027a28ac2f2fd.html" } ], "topics": [] } ], "topics": [] }