{ "id": "RS22465", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "number": "RS22465", "active": false, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 316283, "date": "2006-06-30", "retrieved": "2016-04-07T18:59:09.324029", "title": "The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): The Supreme Court Denies Expert Fees in Arlington Central School District v. Murphy", "summary": "The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) provides federal funding for the\neducation\nof children with disabilities and requires, as a condition for the receipt of such funds, the provision\nof a free appropriate public education (FAPE). It also contains detailed due process procedures,\nincluding a provision for attorneys' fees. The Supreme Court has examined various issues under\nIDEA, (1) and in Arlington Central School District v. Murphy \nheld, in a decision authored by Justice Alito, that parents who prevail in a suit against a school\ndistrict may not recover expert witness fees. \n \n \n \n 1. For an examination of these decisions, see CRS Report RL33444 , The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): Supreme Court\nDecisions , by Nancy Lee Jones.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RS22465", "sha1": "d3131666b4031fb376404f7cb798f8e21ed5a5aa", "filename": "files/20060630_RS22465_d3131666b4031fb376404f7cb798f8e21ed5a5aa.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RS22465", "sha1": "7cd1d71e8c35274c301e0a2c0fd69f566f2c1f3c", "filename": "files/20060630_RS22465_7cd1d71e8c35274c301e0a2c0fd69f566f2c1f3c.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [] } ], "topics": [] }