{
  "id": "RS22342",
  "type": "CRS Report",
  "typeId": "REPORTS",
  "number": "RS22342",
  "active": false,
  "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
  "versions": [
    {
      "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
      "id": 310431,
      "date": "2005-12-02",
      "retrieved": "2016-04-07T19:26:04.581029",
      "title": "Parental Notification and Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England",
      "summary": "This report discusses  Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England , which\nwill be\ndecided by the U.S. Supreme Court this term. The case involves the constitutionality of the New\nHampshire Parental Notification Prior to Abortion Act. In November 2004, the U.S. Court of\nAppeals for the First Circuit invalidated the act because it does not include an explicit exception that\nwould waive the measure\u2019s requirements to preserve the health of the pregnant minor. \nAyotte, the\nAttorney General of New Hampshire, contends that a judicial bypass procedure included in the act\nand other state statutes sufficiently preserve the health of a minor. The Court will review that\nposition, and consider whether the First Circuit applied the correct standard of review when it heard\nthe case in 2004.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORTS",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "encoding": "utf-8",
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RS22342",
          "sha1": "4d126101b70cd8b9d0a5a6e9355cfe84410a259f",
          "filename": "files/20051202_RS22342_4d126101b70cd8b9d0a5a6e9355cfe84410a259f.html",
          "images": null
        },
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "encoding": null,
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RS22342",
          "sha1": "7f86b045b4cd1f1a49cd9affa17472a1bbf7f6b6",
          "filename": "files/20051202_RS22342_7f86b045b4cd1f1a49cd9affa17472a1bbf7f6b6.pdf",
          "images": null
        }
      ],
      "topics": []
    }
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Constitutional Questions"
  ]
}