{
  "id": "RS22132",
  "type": "CRS Report",
  "typeId": "REPORTS",
  "number": "RS22132",
  "active": false,
  "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
  "versions": [
    {
      "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
      "id": 303677,
      "date": "2005-05-02",
      "retrieved": "2016-04-07T19:46:07.059029",
      "title": "Legislative Vetoes After Chadha",
      "summary": "In  INS  v.  Chadha,  462 U.S.  919 (1983), the Supreme Court struck down\nCongress's use of the\n\"legislative veto,\" a device used for half a century to control certain activities in the executive\nbranch. Congress had delegated power to executive officials on the condition that Congress could\ncontrol their decisions without having to pass another law. These legislative controls, short of a\npublic law, included one-house vetoes, two-house vetoes, and committee vetoes. Congress no longer\nrelies on one-house or two-house vetoes, but committee and subcommittee vetoes continue to be a\npart of executive-legislative accommodations. This report will be updated as events warrant.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORTS",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "encoding": null,
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RS22132",
          "sha1": "f3f5994e75ce9c1c1ac4aac4e3b019cfc61f2f38",
          "filename": "files/20050502_RS22132_f3f5994e75ce9c1c1ac4aac4e3b019cfc61f2f38.pdf",
          "images": null
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20050502_RS22132_f3f5994e75ce9c1c1ac4aac4e3b019cfc61f2f38.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": []
    }
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Constitutional Questions",
    "Economic Policy"
  ]
}